The approval, granted through Luxembourg’s financial regulator to Ripple Payments Europe S. A., gives the company a Crypto Asset Service Provider licence and allows it to passport services across 30 EEA markets. It follows a preliminary clearance in late June and places Ripple among the firms that have crossed the bloc’s new compliance threshold as Europe moves from fragmented national supervision to a single rulebook for digital assets.

The authorisation strengthens Ripple’s European strategy at a time when crypto companies face a sharper divide between licensed operators and platforms still trying to meet the new standards. MiCA requires crypto service providers to satisfy governance, capital, custody, disclosure, anti-money-laundering and operational resilience requirements before they can continue serving customers under the new regime. Companies without approval must halt or wind down services in affected markets.

Ripple’s licence covers a critical part of its business: institutional crypto payments. The company has built its European expansion around regulated payment infrastructure, stablecoin settlement and digital asset custody rather than retail trading alone. Its Luxembourg entity already holds electronic money institution status, giving it a broader foundation for payments activity alongside the new crypto authorisation.

The timing is significant. The EU’s framework is now becoming a test of whether digital asset companies can operate under banking-style supervision while still offering fast cross-border settlement. Ripple has long argued that predictable regulation is essential for institutional adoption, particularly for banks, corporates and payment firms that must meet strict compliance obligations before using blockchain-based rails.

Ripple’s approval also carries competitive weight. Several major crypto platforms have faced difficulties securing permissions before the end-June deadline, while licensed rivals are using MiCA as a gateway to scale across Europe. The single authorisation model allows approved firms to avoid separate applications in each member state, although national regulators retain supervisory powers and can scrutinise conduct, consumer protection and risk controls.

The new licence gives Ripple a clearer path to promote its payments product to banks, fintechs and corporates seeking alternatives to conventional correspondent banking channels. Ripple’s model uses blockchain infrastructure to move value across borders, with settlement designed to reduce friction in transactions that often involve multiple intermediaries, currency conversions and compliance checks.

The approval comes as the company seeks to deepen the role of its dollar-backed stablecoin, RLUSD, in global payments. Stablecoins have become a major focus for regulators because they can function like digital cash in trading, remittance and settlement markets. MiCA sets specific rules for issuers of e-money tokens and asset-referenced tokens, including reserve, redemption and disclosure obligations.

Ripple’s wider regulatory record has become central to its market positioning. The company says it holds more than 75 licences and registrations globally, including permissions in the United States, the United Kingdom, Singapore, Dubai and Ireland. That footprint matters as financial institutions increasingly prefer counterparties with demonstrable regulatory status in multiple jurisdictions.

Europe’s new regime is expected to accelerate consolidation in the crypto sector. Smaller providers may struggle with the cost of compliance, legal controls, cybersecurity systems and reporting duties. Larger companies with established compliance teams are better placed to absorb the burden and use authorisation as a commercial advantage.

The licence also reflects Luxembourg’s growing role as a hub for digital finance. The country has attracted payments, fund administration and fintech firms because of its cross-border financial services ecosystem and its experience with EU passporting. For Ripple, Luxembourg offers access to the wider European market while placing the business under a regulator familiar with complex financial infrastructure.

MiCA does not remove all risk from crypto markets. Digital assets remain volatile, and institutional adoption still depends on liquidity, counterparty confidence, operational resilience and clarity over how stablecoins interact with existing payment and securities laws. Regulators across Europe are also expected to monitor whether firms use passporting responsibly or exploit differences in national supervisory approaches.

Arabian Post – Crypto News Network

The article Ripple wins Europe-wide crypto licence appeared first on Arabian Post.

The Miami and New York-based company closed its business combination on 1 July, with trading starting the following day. The deal is expected to raise about $400 million in gross proceeds, after Cantor Equity Partners II retained 71.5 per cent of its trust and secured shareholder approval at the end of June. The company had earlier been valued at $1.25 billion on a pre-money equity basis.

SECZ rose during its first trading session, climbing as much as 16 per cent before ending at $12.30, a gain of 4.4 per cent. The debut placed one of the best-known real-world asset tokenisation companies directly inside the listed equity market it has been trying to modernise. Securitize also moved to tokenise part of its own common stock on Avalanche and Solana, a step designed to show how regulated shares can be represented on public blockchains while maintaining issuer control and compliance checks.

The listing follows a series of partnerships that have helped Securitize move from crypto-market infrastructure into mainstream financial plumbing. Its platform has brought more than $4 billion of assets on-chain, spanning funds, private credit products and securities issued with large asset managers. BlackRock’s BUIDL fund, launched through Securitize in 2024, became one of the most visible examples of tokenised money-market exposure and has grown into a multi-billion-dollar vehicle used by digital-asset firms seeking yield-bearing collateral.

Securitize was founded in 2017 by Carlos Domingo, a former Telefónica executive, and has drawn backing from investors including BlackRock, Morgan Stanley, ARK Invest, Blockchain Capital and Banco Santander. Its business model covers issuance, compliance, transfer agency, investor onboarding and secondary-market infrastructure for tokenised financial products. The company has also worked with Apollo, KKR, Hamilton Lane and VanEck, placing it among a small group of firms trying to bridge regulated capital markets and blockchain settlement.

The NYSE listing comes after the exchange partnered with Securitize this year to develop infrastructure for tokenised securities. The collaboration includes work on digital transfer agency standards and mechanisms that would allow corporate and exchange-traded fund issuers to create blockchain-based securities. The broader effort reflects a shift by large market operators from observing tokenisation experiments to building regulated frameworks that could sit alongside existing settlement systems.

Tokenisation converts claims on financial or real-world assets into digital tokens recorded on a blockchain. Supporters argue the model can reduce settlement times, widen access to private markets, enable programmable compliance and improve collateral mobility. For issuers, it can offer automated cap-table management and faster distribution. For investors, the appeal lies in fractional ownership, real-time transferability and the potential for around-the-clock markets.

The sector, however, still faces substantial hurdles. Liquidity remains uneven, even where asset values are large. Many tokenised products have limited turnover, narrow investor bases and high concentration among a small number of holders. Legal enforceability, custody arrangements, reserve verification and cross-border recognition are also unresolved in several jurisdictions. Academic work on real-world asset systems has warned that on-chain tokens do not automatically remove dependence on off-chain legal rights, intermediaries and courts.

Securitize’s public-market status may help it address one of the industry’s central problems: trust. A listed company faces disclosure duties, market scrutiny and governance expectations that private crypto firms often avoid. That could strengthen its pitch to institutional clients that want blockchain efficiency without abandoning familiar regulatory protections. It may also give Securitize more capital to expand its platform, pursue licences and build partnerships with exchanges, custodians and asset managers.

Regulators are moving carefully. Spain’s market watchdog authorised a Securitize-linked blockchain securities venue under Europe’s distributed ledger pilot regime, allowing the issuance, trading and settlement of tokenised securities within a controlled framework. In the United States, the regulatory picture is still developing, with exchanges, fintech firms and asset managers testing models for tokenised stocks, funds and Treasury products while seeking clarity on settlement, investor protection and market structure rules.

Arabian Post – Crypto News Network

The article Securitize makes NYSE leap as tokenisation gains ground appeared first on Arabian Post.

Live market data showed Bitcoin, Ethereum, XRP, BNB, Solana, Dogecoin, Tron and Hyperliquid’s HYPE controlling roughly $1.74 trillion in combined value, close to the $1.71 trillion level tracked across the same group during the latest phase of trading. Their combined weight underscores how a small cluster of bluechip tokens continues to shape the direction of the wider digital-asset market despite the sector’s claims of decentralisation and varied use cases.

Bitcoin remains the anchor, with a market value of about $1.26 trillion and a price above $63,000. Ether, the second-largest non-stablecoin crypto asset, was valued at about $217 billion, while BNB, XRP and Solana formed the next major tier. Tron, HYPE and Dogecoin rounded out the group, with market values ranging from about $31 billion to $13 billion. Stablecoins, led by Tether and USDC, still occupy major positions in the overall rankings, but they are excluded from most bluechip risk baskets because their role is closer to settlement and liquidity than directional exposure.

The latest market pattern shows a broad rebound across several major tokens, with Ether, XRP, Solana and HYPE posting stronger seven-day gains than Bitcoin. That has helped restore some confidence after months of weaker trading, but it has not changed the core structure of the market. Bitcoin dominance remains above 55 per cent, while Ether accounts for under 10 per cent of global crypto value. That leaves the wider market highly sensitive to moves in the two largest assets.

The synchronised movement is not new, but it has become more important as institutional products, automated trading strategies and exchange-traded fund flows increasingly link digital assets to wider risk appetite. When Bitcoin rallies, liquidity often spreads quickly into Ether and high-beta tokens. When Bitcoin falls, investors tend to reduce exposure across the board, regardless of whether a token’s narrative is payments, smart contracts, decentralised finance, meme culture or exchange infrastructure.

Research into crypto market behaviour has strengthened that view. Studies of large-token performance show that correlations rise sharply during sell-offs, weakening the argument that crypto portfolios provide meaningful internal diversification during stress. A paper examining the largest cryptocurrencies through the 2021–2025 period found that downside links between major tokens remained dense and persistent, while upside moves were more fragmented and sector-specific. That means investors may benefit from token selection during rallies but face broad market losses during crashes.

The latest cycle also reflects the influence of macroeconomic variables that now sit outside the crypto ecosystem. Inflation expectations, interest-rate uncertainty, geopolitical risk, energy prices and the direction of technology shares have all fed into digital-asset trading. Crypto no longer trades as a sealed alternative market. It increasingly behaves like a volatile extension of global risk sentiment.

ETF flows remain one of the most closely watched signals. Weakening demand for Bitcoin and Ether products has placed pressure on institutional sentiment, while banks and brokerages have trimmed price targets after reducing expectations for net inflows. Bitcoin and Ether have both traded below longer-term moving averages during parts of the year, reinforcing caution among portfolio managers who rely on momentum and liquidity indicators.

Regulation is another constraint. Progress on digital-asset legislation in the United States has been slower than many market participants expected, while enforcement, custody, staking and token-classification questions continue to shape institutional participation. Europe’s regulatory framework has given exchanges and issuers clearer operating rules, but global standards remain uneven. That leaves large investors balancing improved market infrastructure against continuing legal and compliance risk.

The position of HYPE among the largest non-stablecoin crypto assets also shows how quickly market leadership can change. Hyperliquid’s rise has been tied to demand for decentralised perpetual trading and on-chain derivatives, areas that appeal to traders seeking alternatives to centralised exchanges. Its inclusion alongside Bitcoin, Ether, XRP, BNB, Solana, Tron and Dogecoin points to a market where infrastructure tokens and trading-platform assets can gain bluechip status faster than older payment-focused projects.

Solana’s recovery has been supported by continued activity in consumer applications, meme-token trading and decentralised exchange volumes. BNB remains closely tied to the Binance ecosystem. XRP’s strength reflects renewed demand for payment-linked tokens and legal clarity compared with earlier cycles. Tron continues to draw stablecoin settlement activity, especially through USDT transfers. Dogecoin, despite lacking the technical profile of smart-contract networks, still benefits from retail liquidity and its status as the longest-running meme asset.

Arabian Post – Crypto News Network

The article Crypto bellwethers synchronise as recovery test deepens appeared first on Arabian Post.

The licence, recorded on VARA’s public register as VL/26/06/002 and issued on 22 June 2026, authorises Tribe Tokenisation FZE for broker-dealer services. Its addition takes the number of active licensed VASPs under the Dubai framework to 50, covering exchanges, broker-dealers, custodians, advisory firms, management and investment platforms, lending businesses and virtual-asset issuers.

The milestone underlines how Dubai has moved from policy ambition to a more structured licensing market since VARA was established in March 2022. The regulator oversees virtual asset activity across Dubai’s mainland and free zones, excluding the Dubai International Financial Centre, which operates under a separate financial regulatory system. VARA’s framework was designed to bring crypto businesses, tokenisation platforms and digital asset intermediaries into a rule-based environment rather than leaving them to operate through lightly supervised structures.

Tribe Tokenisation FZE is registered at the Dubai World Trade Centre and has positioned itself around tokenised property investment. Its platform model allows investors to access fractional exposure to real estate assets through digital tokens, with governance rights, disclosure of fees and secondary-market exit options forming part of its commercial pitch. The company had earlier stated that it held in-principle approval from VARA for broker-dealer activities. The new listing moves it into the licensed category, though operational launch remains subject to regulatory conditions.

An active licence does not automatically mean a firm has begun full commercial operations. Newly licensed VASPs may still need to complete controlled operational requirements before offering services to clients or expanding market activity. At the end of 2025, 39 licensed VASPs were classified as fully operational, showing that licence numbers and live market activity are related but not identical indicators.

Dubai’s register shows that broker-dealer services dominate the licensing pipeline, but the market has widened over the past two years. Binance FZE, Crypto. com’s Foris DAX Middle East FZE, OKX Middle East Fintech FZE, Deribit FZE, BitOasis Technologies FZE, BitGo entities, Zand Bank, HashKey MENA FZE and several specialist platforms are among the firms listed with permissions spanning trading, custody, exchange services, derivatives, lending, management and investment activities. This mix indicates that Dubai is trying to build a complete digital-asset ecosystem rather than a market led only by retail trading platforms.

The expansion comes as real-world asset tokenisation becomes a more prominent theme in global digital finance. Tokenisation seeks to represent assets such as real estate, bonds, commodities or funds on blockchain-based systems, allowing fractional ownership, faster settlement and potentially wider investor access. The model also carries risks around valuation, custody, liquidity, governance rights, cyber security and investor understanding, making regulatory scrutiny central to its credibility.

VARA’s licensing process examines governance, ownership, financial resilience, technology, cyber controls, risk management, compliance and anti-money laundering systems. Licensed firms remain subject to continuing supervision, which is critical in a sector still affected globally by exchange failures, fraud cases, unstable tokens and uneven investor-protection standards.

Dubai has also tightened its wider virtual-asset regime in 2026. Updated rulebooks have clarified the treatment of virtual-asset derivatives and token issuance, while new anti-money laundering and counter-terrorist financing guidance has placed greater emphasis on business risk assessment. The direction of travel is toward more granular supervision, especially as firms move from simple spot trading into asset management, structured products and tokenised securities-like offerings.

Arabian Post – Crypto News Network

The article Dubai expands regulated virtual asset market appeared first on Arabian Post.

The Tokyo-listed company’s latest acquisition is valued at about $170 million at current market prices, while its total Bitcoin reserve is worth roughly $2.58 billion. The purchase extends a rapid accumulation strategy that has transformed the former hotel and investment business into one of Asia’s most closely watched Bitcoin treasury companies.

The company bought the additional coins at an average price of around 12.71 million yen per Bitcoin, with the quarter’s purchase costing about 35.89 billion yen. Its cumulative Bitcoin investment now stands at about 659.26 billion yen, implying an average acquisition cost of roughly 15.33 million yen per coin across the full holding.

Metaplanet’s disclosure comes as Bitcoin trades near $60,000, with the asset still drawing institutional demand despite wide price swings and continuing regulatory scrutiny across major markets. The company’s 43,000 BTC balance places it close to Twenty One Capital, which holds just over 43,500 BTC, and ahead of several miners and financial companies that have built sizeable reserves. Strategy remains the dominant corporate holder by a wide margin, with a balance several times larger than the rest of the listed market combined.

Metaplanet began shifting decisively towards Bitcoin in 2024, presenting the asset as a treasury reserve intended to protect shareholder value against currency depreciation and balance-sheet erosion. The move mirrored a strategy pioneered in the United States, where companies have used equity, debt, convertible instruments and cash flows to accumulate Bitcoin as a long-term reserve asset.

The pace of Metaplanet’s buying has accelerated sharply. The company ended 2025 with 35,102 BTC, lifted the total to 40,177 BTC by the end of the first quarter of 2026, and has now reached 43,000 BTC. That represents an increase of nearly 7,900 BTC since the start of the year, even as its stock has faced pressure from volatility in crypto-linked equities and investor concern over balance-sheet leverage.

The company has set an ambitious long-term target of building a reserve equal to about 1 per cent of Bitcoin’s fixed 21 million supply. That would require holdings of about 210,000 BTC, far above its current position. Management has framed the target as part of a broader plan to make Metaplanet a leading Bitcoin-focused capital markets vehicle in Japan and a proxy for investors seeking exposure through regulated equity markets rather than direct token ownership.

The strategy carries both potential upside and material risk. A rising Bitcoin price increases the value of the company’s treasury and may strengthen its ability to raise capital on favourable terms. A prolonged fall in Bitcoin, however, can widen losses, pressure net asset value and dilute shareholders if fresh equity is issued at depressed prices.

Metaplanet has also sought to generate income from its Bitcoin-related activities, including options-linked strategies. That business has become an important part of its operating narrative, but it is sensitive to market volatility, liquidity and counterparty conditions. Softer option premiums can reduce revenue even when the company’s Bitcoin balance continues to expand.

The company’s growing reserve also reflects a wider trend among listed firms using Bitcoin as a balance-sheet asset. Miners, investment vehicles and operating companies have adopted treasury models that treat Bitcoin not just as a speculative holding but as a core capital allocation decision. Supporters argue that the fixed supply and global liquidity of Bitcoin make it attractive during periods of currency weakness and fiscal uncertainty. Critics warn that corporate treasuries built around a volatile asset can expose ordinary shareholders to risks that are difficult to price.

Japan’s market gives Metaplanet’s strategy added significance. The country has a mature financial system, a history of low interest rates, and a regulatory framework for digital assets that has developed after earlier exchange failures forced tighter oversight. A listed company using Tokyo’s capital markets to accumulate Bitcoin at scale adds a new dimension to Asia’s crypto-investment landscape.

Arabian Post – Crypto News Network

The article Metaplanet lifts Bitcoin reserve to 43,000 appeared first on Arabian Post.

The claim, filed on Monday, marks one of the largest private actions brought in Britain against a global crypto exchange. The investors allege that Binance entities promoted and sold leveraged products, including futures, options and leveraged tokens, from late 2019, exposing retail users to losses that were magnified by the structure of the products. Some claimants say they lost tens of thousands of pounds, while others allege far larger personal losses.

The case is being brought under the Financial Services and Markets Act, with the claimants arguing that Binance was not authorised to offer the products to consumers in Britain. They contend that the platform’s marketing and availability of the products breached rules designed to protect retail investors from complex and speculative financial instruments.

Binance, the world’s largest crypto exchange by trading volume, has said it intends to defend the action. The company declined to comment in detail while the case is before the court. Zhao, widely known in the crypto industry as CZ, stepped down as Binance’s chief executive in 2023 after the company reached a major settlement with US authorities over anti-money-laundering and sanctions-related failures.

The London claim names several Binance-linked entities, including Binance Holdings, incorporated in the Cayman Islands, and Nest Exchange, a UAE-based entity, along with Zhao and other parties associated with the platform. The claimants allege that Binance’s corporate structure made it harder for consumers and regulators to identify which entity was responsible for services offered through the trading platform.

The lawsuit comes at a sensitive point for crypto regulation in Britain. The Financial Conduct Authority banned the sale, marketing and distribution of crypto derivatives and exchange-traded notes to retail consumers from January 2021, after concluding that such products were unsuitable for ordinary investors because of volatility, valuation difficulties, market abuse risks and limited consumer understanding. The watchdog estimated at the time that the ban would save retail consumers about £53 million a year in losses.

The investors’ case focuses partly on the period before that ban took effect, when crypto derivatives were still available to retail users but regulated activities still required permission. The claimants argue that Binance’s products were not simple spot crypto trades but complex financial instruments that could rapidly wipe out invested funds when markets moved against users. Leveraged trading allows traders to control a position larger than their cash stake, raising the prospect of amplified gains but also sharper losses.

Binance’s regulatory position in Britain has long been under scrutiny. In June 2021, the FCA said Binance Markets Limited was not permitted to undertake regulated activity in the UK. The firm later cancelled its FCA permissions, a process completed in May 2023. The regulator has stated that no Binance Group entity holds UK authorisation or registration to conduct regulated business in the country.

The claim also lands as Britain prepares to bring cryptoasset businesses more fully inside its financial regulatory perimeter. New rules are expected to require firms serving UK customers to meet stronger standards on capital, custody, governance, disclosure, market abuse controls and consumer protection. An authorisation gateway is due to open on 30 September 2026, with the broader regime expected to take effect in 2027.

For Binance, the London action adds to a series of regulatory and legal pressures across major markets. The exchange has faced scrutiny in the United States, Europe and Australia over compliance systems, customer classification and its handling of higher-risk products. In 2023, Binance agreed to pay more than $4 billion in penalties in the United States, while Zhao personally pleaded guilty to failing to maintain an effective anti-money-laundering programme and later served a prison sentence.

The company has since sought to present itself as a more compliance-focused business under new leadership, with expanded regulatory, legal and financial crime teams. It says it serves hundreds of millions of users globally and continues to seek licences in major jurisdictions. But regulators remain cautious about its past compliance record, its global structure and the role of Zhao, who remains a significant shareholder.

Arabian Post – Crypto News Network

The article Binance faces UK investor claim over derivatives appeared first on Arabian Post.

The initiative brings together more than 140 companies, including Visa, Mastercard, American Express, BlackRock, Coinbase, Stripe, BNY, Standard Chartered, Google, Shopify, Coinbase, Ripple, Fireblocks, Gemini, MetaMask, Emirates NBD and Abu Dhabi Islamic Bank. Open USD, trading under the ticker OUSD, is expected to go live later this year and will be governed by Open Standard, an independent company structured around partner participation.

The project marks one of the largest coordinated moves by established financial and technology groups into stablecoin infrastructure. Unlike stablecoins controlled by a single issuer, Open USD is being positioned as shared infrastructure for businesses that move money across borders, platforms and blockchains. Its backers say the model will allow companies to mint and redeem the token without fees, avoid artificial limits on volume, and share in most of the earnings generated from reserves after a management fee.

The launch comes as stablecoins move deeper into mainstream finance. The sector is dominated by dollar-linked tokens such as Tether’s USDT and Circle’s USDC, which together account for the bulk of global stablecoin supply and trading activity. The entry of card networks, asset managers, fintech platforms and exchanges into a jointly governed model signals a shift from experimental crypto use towards payment infrastructure built for merchants, banks, issuers and global platforms.

Open Standard said Open USD will be designed for payments, trading, treasury flows, remittances, platform payouts, merchant settlement and agentic commerce. Reserves are to be maintained at major financial institutions under US regulatory requirements, a structure intended to reassure banks and payment companies that remain cautious about digital-asset risk.

Visa has framed the project as part of a wider push to bring stablecoins into existing payment rails. The company has already expanded stablecoin settlement pilots across multiple blockchains and has said Open USD gives businesses the governance and reliability needed to move money at scale. Mastercard has also broadened its settlement capabilities to include regulated stablecoins, intraday settlement and weekend options for issuers and acquirers, reinforcing the industry’s move towards always-on settlement.

Stripe’s participation is significant because of its growing stablecoin strategy. The company has been building crypto payment infrastructure after acquiring Bridge, a stablecoin orchestration platform, and is expected to make Open USD a default stablecoin option for businesses running on its systems. That gives the initiative a direct route into online merchants, software platforms and marketplaces.

Coinbase’s involvement adds a notable competitive angle. The exchange has long been closely associated with USDC through its commercial relationship with Circle. Its participation in Open USD suggests that large crypto platforms may now support multiple stablecoin rails rather than relying on one dominant asset. Coinbase’s business chief Shan Aggarwal said stablecoins are the most important development in payments and that customers should have access to the best infrastructure available.

BlackRock’s backing adds institutional weight. Samara Cohen, its global head of market development, said stablecoins could play an important role in digital markets when supported by trusted infrastructure and practical utility. BNY has also pointed to the prospect of stablecoins growing into a much larger market by 2030, reflecting rising interest from custodians and asset-servicing groups in tokenised money.

The project also has a Gulf dimension. Emirates NBD, Mashreq, Abu Dhabi Islamic Bank and RAK Bank are listed among participating institutions, placing regional lenders inside a global stablecoin initiative at a time when Gulf financial centres are competing to attract digital-asset infrastructure. For banks, the opportunity lies in faster settlement, cross-border flows and programmable treasury use cases, but adoption will depend on regulation, risk controls and reserve transparency.

Open USD will face strong competition from USDT and USDC, both of which benefit from liquidity, exchange integration and market familiarity. It will also have to prove that collaborative governance can work across companies with different regulatory obligations, commercial interests and technology priorities. The promise of shared reserve economics may help attract distribution partners, but regulators will scrutinise how reserves are held, how redemptions are handled and how operational control is exercised.

Arabian Post – Crypto News Network

The article Payments giants back shared Open USD stablecoin appeared first on Arabian Post.

The plan extends the company’s tokenised gold strategy into collateralised credit, a market structure already familiar to holders of bitcoin who use digital assets to obtain liquidity while keeping exposure to price movements. The new product is being developed with Ledn, the crypto lender known for bitcoin-backed loans, and is expected to allow XAU₮ holders to pledge tokenised gold as collateral for loans denominated in stablecoins.

The initiative gives Tether a new route to deepen the utility of gold held across its product base. The company’s bullion holdings, including reserves linked to USDT and XAU₮, have been estimated at about 154 tonnes, worth roughly $23 billion at market prices earlier this year. That scale places the stablecoin issuer among major private-sector gold holders and underscores how far its balance sheet has moved beyond a simple dollar-token model.

XAU₮ is structured as a token backed one-to-one by fine troy ounces of physical gold held in Switzerland. Each token represents ownership linked to specified gold bars that meet London Good Delivery standards. By the end of March, the token was backed by 707,747.139 fine troy ounces of physical gold, with the total market value of the reserves exceeding $3.3 billion. The number reflected a sharp rise from the end of 2025, when the reserves stood at just over 520,000 fine troy ounces.

The lending model is designed to let holders retain exposure to bullion while drawing liquidity, much as bitcoin-backed loans allow investors to avoid selling during market moves. Ledn has indicated that the product will follow the operating framework used for its bitcoin lending business, including a policy that pledged collateral is not lent out for interest. Loans are expected to be available through stablecoin rails, including USDT and USA₮, as the platform widens its hard-asset offering.

For Tether, the timing is significant. Gold has become a larger part of its reserve and investment narrative as demand for hard assets has grown amid concerns over inflation, geopolitical tension and confidence in fiat currencies. The company slowed gold purchases in the first quarter after heavy buying in late 2025, but it still added about six tonnes to reserves linked to USDT and another six tonnes to XAU₮ backing during the period. USDT reserves remained dominated by Treasury bills, but gold accounted for about 10 per cent of the reserve mix at the end of March.

The move also reflects a broader contest in the market for tokenised real-world assets. Gold-backed tokens have attracted investors seeking blockchain-based access to bullion, 24-hour trading and easier transferability than traditional vault holdings. Tether and Paxos remain among the most prominent issuers in the segment, while newer platforms are testing products that combine tokenised commodities with decentralised finance-style borrowing and yield strategies.

Supporters of the model argue that gold-backed lending can make bullion more flexible. A holder who would otherwise need to sell gold during a liquidity crunch can instead borrow against it, keeping exposure if prices rise. The arrangement may appeal to crypto investors who treat gold and bitcoin as parallel hedges against monetary risk, as well as to institutions seeking collateral that is less volatile than purely digital tokens.

The risks are also clear. Tokenised gold depends on custody, redemption terms, legal ownership claims and the issuer’s operational resilience. Market stress could test how quickly investors can redeem or transfer claims, especially if collateral values move sharply. Lending against the asset adds another layer of risk, including margin calls, liquidation thresholds and counterparty exposure to the lending platform. The promise that collateral will not be rehypothecated may reduce one concern, but it does not remove credit or operational risks.

Regulatory scrutiny is likely to remain a central issue. Stablecoin issuers are under growing pressure to provide detailed reserve disclosures, strengthen redemption protections and clarify the rights of token holders. Tether has expanded from dollar tokens into bitcoin, gold, payments, energy and other investments, making its business more complex than that of a conventional payment stablecoin operator. Its supporters point to profits, liquidity and scale; critics continue to call for deeper transparency around reserves and governance.

The gold-backed loan product could nevertheless strengthen XAU₮’s position in a market still small compared with conventional bullion investment. Exchange-traded gold funds, central-bank reserves and physical bars continue to dominate global gold exposure. Tokenised gold remains a niche, but its appeal is growing among investors who want a digital asset that is tied to a tangible commodity rather than to the price of a crypto network.

Arabian Post – Crypto News Network

The article Tether widens gold strategy with XAUT loans appeared first on Arabian Post.

The largest cryptocurrency changed hands near $59,873 after briefly falling through a level watched closely by traders for signs of deeper stress. Ether traded at about $1,564, extending a weekly fall of nearly 10 per cent. XRP stood near $1.04, Solana at $70.37, while Dogecoin also held up better than several larger tokens despite the risk-off mood across speculative assets.

The sell-off was driven less by crypto-specific shocks than by a shift in global macro conditions. Expectations that the Federal Reserve may keep policy tighter for longer lifted US yields and supported the dollar, reducing appetite for assets that offer no yield and depend heavily on liquidity conditions. The move echoed weakness in technology and artificial intelligence-linked equities, which had helped draw capital away from digital assets through June.

Bitcoin’s break below $60,000 marked a reversal from the optimism that carried the market into the year. The token remains far below its late-2025 peak above $126,000, and the decline has revived debate over whether institutional ownership has made Bitcoin more stable or simply more exposed to conventional market cycles. Rather than behaving as a detached alternative asset, Bitcoin has traded increasingly like a high-beta macro instrument, sensitive to inflation data, central-bank signals and dollar strength.

Exchange-traded fund flows added to the pressure. Spot Bitcoin products have seen heavy withdrawals during June, with multi-week outflows eroding one of the key supports behind last year’s rally. Earlier enthusiasm around regulated access to Bitcoin has been replaced by a more cautious allocation pattern, as investors rotate towards cash, short-duration fixed income and equities tied to the AI investment cycle.

Ether has suffered from a different problem. The token’s fall to around $1,564 reflects both macro selling and doubts about near-term network revenue growth. Activity across decentralised finance and non-fungible token markets remains below the peaks seen in earlier cycles, while competing chains continue to court developers with lower fees and faster execution. That has left Ether more exposed when market-wide leverage is reduced.

Solana’s relative strength is notable because it has often traded as a more volatile proxy for risk appetite. Its hold near $70 suggests that investors still see value in its payments, trading and consumer-application ecosystem, even as speculative excess has been cut back. Network outages, validator concentration concerns and regulatory questions remain risks, but Solana’s active developer base and high transaction throughput have kept it in focus among institutions assessing blockchain infrastructure beyond Bitcoin and Ether.

XRP’s steadier performance reflects its distinct market narrative. The token has benefited from greater legal clarity in the United States and from continued interest in cross-border settlement use cases. Its price near $1.04 still leaves it below cycle highs, but traders have treated it less as a broad risk proxy and more as a regulatory-resolution story with potential payment-sector relevance.

Dogecoin’s separation from weaker tokens highlights the persistence of retail-driven liquidity even in a falling market. The meme asset remains vulnerable to sharp swings because its valuation is tied more to community momentum and speculative positioning than to cash flows or protocol revenue. Yet its deep exchange liquidity and broad brand recognition have helped it avoid the sharper losses seen in smaller tokens.

The market’s next test will come from inflation readings, central-bank commentary and ETF flow data. A softer inflation print could ease pressure on yields and provide room for a relief rally, while further dollar strength may keep Bitcoin pinned near technical support. Traders are watching the $55,000 area as a potential downside level if the break below $60,000 attracts systematic selling.

Arabian Post – Crypto News Network

The article Altcoins resist as Bitcoin absorbs June shock appeared first on Arabian Post.

The initiative, unveiled on Thursday, is designed to consolidate a payments ecosystem around Avalanche’s blockchain network, covering stablecoins, custody, foreign exchange, card issuance, business payments, asset management, global payouts and on-chain settlement. The group says its participating firms support payment flows across more than 150 countries, 96 currencies and about 22 billion payout endpoints.

The launch comes as digital asset networks seek a larger role in mainstream payments after years in which blockchain use was dominated by trading, decentralised finance and token issuance. The collective is being positioned as a practical network for companies that want round-the-clock settlement, programmable treasury tools and cross-border payment rails without relying solely on traditional correspondent banking systems.

VanEck’s participation adds a traditional asset-management presence to the group. The New York-based firm has expanded its digital asset business through exchange-traded products and tokenised investment initiatives, while Franklin Templeton has also developed tokenised fund products. Their presence alongside stablecoin issuers, custodians and payments firms reflects the broader convergence between capital markets and blockchain infrastructure.

Avalanche, developed by Ava Labs, has promoted its network as a platform for custom blockchains and institutional applications. Its strategy has increasingly focused on enterprise-grade use cases, including tokenised assets, settlement layers and financial-market infrastructure. The Payments Collective extends that push into commercial payments, where scale, compliance and interoperability are viewed as more important than speculative activity.

The timing is significant. Stablecoins have moved closer to regulated finance after the passage of new rules in major jurisdictions, including the United States and the European Union. Policy clarity has encouraged banks, fintech companies and asset managers to examine whether stablecoins can lower settlement costs, reduce delays and improve liquidity management in cross-border transactions.

The United States has introduced a federal framework for payment stablecoins, requiring reserve backing and public disclosures, while Europe’s MiCA regime has already set rules for crypto-asset service providers and stablecoin issuers. The Bank of England has also softened parts of its proposed framework for sterling-backed stablecoins, signalling a more measured approach as it balances innovation with financial stability.

For businesses, the case for blockchain payments rests on speed and reach. Conventional cross-border payment systems can involve multiple intermediaries, time-zone delays, reconciliation costs and settlement risk. Stablecoin-based payments promise faster transfer of value, especially for firms operating across emerging-market corridors, global contractor networks and digital commerce platforms.

Yet the model faces important constraints. Stablecoins remain a small share of overall payment flows, and many corporate users are still testing rather than deploying them at scale. Questions remain over legal finality, consumer protection, sanctions compliance, dispute resolution and the ability of blockchain networks to handle institutional volumes under stress.

Regulators have also warned that stablecoins may create risks if redemption surges force issuers to sell reserve assets quickly or if users treat private digital tokens as equivalent to bank money without comparable safeguards. The durability of any payments network will depend not only on blockchain performance but also on reserve quality, custody standards, anti-money-laundering controls and operational resilience.

Avalanche’s collective appears designed to address those concerns by assembling firms across the payments stack rather than relying on a single application. Custody providers can handle safekeeping, stablecoin issuers can provide settlement assets, foreign-exchange and payout firms can connect local markets, and asset managers can support tokenised treasury products.

The grouping also reflects a shift in blockchain competition. Networks are no longer competing only on transaction speed or developer incentives; they are increasingly judged by the institutional partnerships they can attract and the regulated use cases they can support. Ethereum, Solana, Polygon and several bank-led tokenisation platforms are also competing for a place in the emerging infrastructure for digital money and tokenised assets.

Arabian Post – Crypto News Network

The article Avalanche forms payments alliance with VanEck appeared first on Arabian Post.

The change marks a strategic shift for a wallet launched on The Open Network in 2022, as its developers seek to position the platform beyond a single blockchain ecosystem. The product now supports TON, TRON, Solana, Ethereum, Base, BNB Chain, Polygon, Arbitrum, Monad, Avalanche and Hyperliquid, with Bitcoin identified as the next network on its roadmap.

Existing users will not need to migrate wallets or change seed phrases, a key point for a product operating in a market where user trust can be weakened by complicated upgrades, bridge risks and security failures. The rebrand keeps the open-source and self-custodial model intact, meaning users retain control over private keys, recovery phrases and funds rather than relying on a central custodian.

The move comes as crypto wallets are evolving from simple storage tools into gateways for payments, decentralised applications, staking, token swaps, non-fungible assets and AI-assisted portfolio management. My Wallet’s new positioning reflects this wider change, with portfolio tracking, in-app swaps, staking options, NFT support, Ledger connectivity and AI-enabled functions being used to attract users who operate across several networks rather than within a single chain.

The wallet’s TON origins remain central to its identity. TON has sought to build momentum through its links to Telegram’s vast user base and its focus on consumer-scale payments, gaming, digital collectibles and mini-apps. That association has helped TON-native products reach users outside the traditional crypto trading audience, but it has also placed pressure on wallet providers to support assets and activity beyond one ecosystem.

My Wallet’s expansion to Ethereum-compatible networks and Solana brings it into more direct competition with large multichain wallets that already serve decentralised finance users, traders and mobile-first crypto holders. MetaMask, Coinbase Wallet, Trust Wallet, Phantom and Bitget Wallet dominate many segments of the market, leaving smaller challengers to compete on user experience, security assurances, speed and ecosystem-specific features.

Security has become a central part of the wallet’s pitch. My Wallet has been audited by CertiK and ranks seventh on CertiK’s wallet security leaderboard, with a Skynet score in the mid-80s. Its developers also maintain reproducible builds and a bug bounty programme with $100,000 reserved through CertiK SkyShield. The team says no critical vulnerabilities have been reported through the programme since it went live in March 2024.

That emphasis is commercially important as wallet attacks remain one of the most damaging parts of the digital-asset sector. Private-key compromise, phishing, address poisoning, malicious browser extensions and clipboard-stealing malware have all become persistent threats. Wallets are now judged not only on whether they can store assets but also on whether they can help users recognise risky transactions, suspicious addresses and unauthorised signing requests before funds move irreversibly on-chain.

The self-custodial model gives users direct control but also transfers responsibility to them. Unlike exchange accounts, self-custody generally leaves no central authority able to reverse a mistaken transfer or recover a lost seed phrase. That creates a difficult balance for wallet developers: simplifying access for mainstream users while preserving the security discipline required for irreversible blockchain transactions.

The addition of a native AI agent signals where the next stage of wallet competition may be heading. AI tools are being tested across crypto interfaces to summarise portfolios, guide users through transactions, flag risk patterns and simplify complex on-chain activity. Adoption remains uneven, and such tools will face scrutiny over permissions, transaction signing and the possibility of users relying too heavily on automated prompts.

My Wallet’s rebrand also reflects a branding challenge faced by products built around a single blockchain that later expand into broader infrastructure. The MyTonWallet name made sense when the product was closely tied to TON, but it became limiting as support spread across major networks. The shorter My Wallet identity allows the company to market itself as a general-purpose crypto interface while retaining recognition among existing TON users.

Arabian Post – Crypto News Network

The article My Wallet broadens reach beyond TON appeared first on Arabian Post.

The licence, granted by the Liechtenstein Financial Market Authority to Bitcoin Suisse AG, allows the company to operate under the Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation, the European framework designed to bring crypto trading, custody and related services under common supervisory standards. The authorisation marks a significant step for a Swiss group that built its reputation in Zug’s Crypto Valley and is now seeking broader access to clients operating under European rules.

Roman Przibylla has been appointed chief executive of Bitcoin Suisse AG to lead the expansion. His mandate covers the build-out of regulated services, client onboarding and operational alignment with MiCAR requirements across targeted EEA jurisdictions. The company is expected to focus on institutional and professional clients, wealth managers and sophisticated private investors seeking custody, brokerage, staking and other digital-asset services within a regulated European framework.

The move comes at a critical point for Europe’s crypto sector. MiCAR became fully applicable for crypto-asset service providers from December 2024, while transitional arrangements in several markets have pushed firms towards licence deadlines in 2026. Companies that fail to secure authorisation face restrictions on new business, marketing and cross-border services, while licensed providers can use passporting rights to operate more efficiently across participating markets.

Liechtenstein has emerged as a practical entry point for crypto firms because of its EEA membership, established financial centre and experience with blockchain regulation. Its earlier Token and Trusted Technology Service Provider Act gave the jurisdiction a head start in supervising digital-asset businesses before MiCAR harmonised rules across Europe. For Bitcoin Suisse, the Vaduz-based European entity offers a bridge between its Swiss base and a wider regulated market.

Bitcoin Suisse was founded in 2013 and became one of Switzerland’s best-known crypto financial services firms, offering trading, brokerage, custody, staking and collateralised lending services. Its development has been closely associated with Zug’s rise as a centre for blockchain companies, where digital-asset businesses, legal advisers, banks and public authorities built one of Europe’s earliest crypto ecosystems.

The new authorisation strengthens the company’s position at a time when regulatory compliance has become a core competitive factor. The collapse of several high-profile crypto platforms in previous market cycles pushed regulators to demand stronger governance, segregation of client assets, capital standards, fit-and-proper management checks and clearer risk disclosures. MiCAR does not remove all risks linked to volatile digital assets, but it gives supervisors a common framework for licensing and monitoring firms that provide services to clients.

Competition in Europe is intensifying as exchanges, fintechs, banks and specialist custodians seek MiCAR approvals. Several large crypto platforms have already selected EU or EEA hubs for expansion, while banks are evaluating tokenisation, stablecoin services and digital-asset custody for institutional clients. The result is a shift away from lightly supervised cross-border activity towards locally authorised entities with compliance teams, audited processes and clearer accountability.

For Bitcoin Suisse, the licence may also help counterbalance the limitations of operating primarily from outside the European Union. Switzerland remains a major crypto and wealth-management market, but access to EEA clients increasingly depends on meeting MiCAR standards through a properly authorised entity. The Liechtenstein structure enables the group to serve European demand without relying only on Swiss regulatory status.

The appointment of Przibylla signals that the company is treating the European push as a dedicated growth line rather than a branch-level extension. The expansion will require investment in governance, compliance reporting, anti-money-laundering controls, technology resilience and client protection processes. These areas are now central to how regulators assess crypto firms, particularly those handling custody and execution services.

The timing is also favourable for regulated providers seeking institutional business. Digital assets have moved further into mainstream finance through exchange-traded products, tokenised assets and blockchain-based settlement experiments. At the same time, clients remain cautious after previous market failures, making licences and supervisory oversight important markers of credibility.

Arabian Post – Crypto News Network

The article Bitcoin Suisse gains regulated route into Europe appeared first on Arabian Post.

The token traded near $1.10 on Tuesday, down about 3 per cent over 24 hours and more than 10 per cent over the week, with its market value hovering around $68 billion to $69 billion. Daily turnover stood near $1.5 billion, a level that pointed to active trading but not the kind of conviction usually associated with a durable breakout.

The latest decline placed XRP close to an area that has repeatedly attracted bids during June. A clean break below $1.05 would weaken the range structure and bring the psychological $1 mark back into focus. A recovery would need to clear resistance around $1.18 before traders could argue that the slide has stabilised. A stronger shift in trend would require a move into the $1.25-$1.30 zone, where sellers have capped previous rebounds.

The weakness reflects a broader loss of speculative energy across digital assets. The global crypto market fell by roughly 3 per cent over the day, with Bitcoin dominance holding above 58 per cent. That backdrop has made traders less willing to chase mid-cap tokens without clear catalysts, even where underlying institutional demand remains visible.

XRP’s chart has been defined by compression rather than collapse. The token has failed to hold rebounds above short-term resistance, but it has also avoided a decisive breakdown through its lower band. That leaves the market vulnerable to abrupt moves once liquidity thins or stop-loss orders cluster around the lower boundary. Traders are watching whether a test of $1.05 produces renewed buying or accelerates selling towards parity.

Momentum indicators have also cooled. The token’s inability to extend above its moving averages has kept short-term traders defensive, while weaker futures activity suggests leveraged participants have reduced exposure. Open interest and funding data point to a market waiting for confirmation rather than building aggressively in either direction.

The contrast between institutional flows and spot-market hesitation remains central to the current setup. XRP-linked exchange-traded products have continued to draw capital through June, with cumulative inflows running into substantial sums. Yet that demand has not translated into a sustained price advance, indicating that long-term allocation has so far been offset by profit-taking, range trading and caution in the wider market.

Ripple’s regulatory progress in Europe has provided a separate fundamental layer. The company said it had secured preliminary approval in Luxembourg for a crypto-asset service provider licence under the European Union’s MiCA framework, a step that could support wider payments activity across the European Economic Area once final conditions are met. The development strengthens Ripple’s institutional narrative, but traders have treated it as insufficient to override current technical pressure on XRP.

Supply dynamics remain another factor for market participants. XRP’s circulating supply is above 62 billion tokens, while total supply is close to 100 billion. Ripple’s escrow releases remain predictable, but the scale of available supply means rallies often require sustained demand rather than short bursts of buying.

For now, XRP is caught between a constructive longer-term story and a fragile near-term chart. Supporters point to payment-network use cases, regulated product flows and Ripple’s efforts to expand in major jurisdictions. Sceptics argue that the token has struggled to convert those developments into price leadership, particularly when broader crypto liquidity shifts back towards Bitcoin or stablecoins.

Arabian Post – Crypto News Network

The article XRP nears support as range pressure builds appeared first on Arabian Post.

Shares of the Elon Musk-led space and technology group extended their decline after the company moved into the bond market for the first time as a public company, seeking longer-term funding only days after a record-setting initial public offering. The sell-off left SpaceX trading below a $2 trillion valuation, after briefly approaching the $3 trillion mark during a post-listing surge.

The decline was striking in scale. The value erased from SpaceX was close to half of bitcoin’s roughly $1.3 trillion market capitalisation, yet bitcoin slipped by less than 1 per cent over the same stretch, holding near the low-$60,000 range. The comparison underscored how a company once treated by investors as a scarcity asset with exposure to rockets, satellites, artificial intelligence and defence-linked infrastructure was suddenly repriced more aggressively than the world’s largest cryptocurrency.

SpaceX shares had rallied sharply after their June 12 listing, helped by strong demand from retail and institutional investors seeking exposure to Starlink, Starship, defence contracts and Musk’s broader technology ecosystem. The IPO raised about $85.7 billion, making it one of the largest public offerings on record. The shares were priced at $135 and later climbed above $210 before the three-day retreat pulled them back towards the $150 level.

The immediate pressure followed plans for a senior unsecured notes offering, with proceeds expected to be used for general corporate purposes and repayment of bridge financing. The move unsettled investors because it came soon after the IPO and against a backdrop of heavy spending across Starship development, satellite networks, artificial intelligence infrastructure and related data-centre capacity.

SpaceX reported more than $100 billion in cash shortly before the bond sale, but the company is also carrying substantial funding needs tied to its expansion plans. It has been investing heavily in next-generation launch systems, satellite broadband, defence-related space services and computing infrastructure linked to artificial intelligence. That combination has created a debate over whether the company’s valuation reflects a realistic growth path or assumes near-perfect execution across several capital-intensive businesses.

The market reaction was also shaped by wider weakness in high-growth technology shares. Investors have become more cautious about companies whose valuations rely on long-dated earnings and large infrastructure spending. Expectations of tighter financial conditions in the United States added to pressure on richly valued equities, particularly firms associated with artificial intelligence and advanced computing.

SpaceX remains one of the world’s most valuable listed companies despite the decline. Its supporters argue that the company has unusually strong strategic assets, including reusable rocket technology, a dominant private launch business, Starlink’s global communications network and expanding government demand for space-based services. Its role in military, commercial and scientific launches gives it a market position that rivals would struggle to replicate quickly.

The sceptical view focuses on valuation, debt and execution risk. SpaceX generated revenue of about $18.7 billion last year but remained loss-making after heavy investment. Analysts have questioned whether its public-market valuation has moved too far ahead of operating earnings, particularly as investors assign high expectations to businesses that are still being built or scaled.

Musk retains overwhelming voting control through a dual-class share structure, a factor that has reassured some investors about strategic continuity while raising governance concerns among others. The company’s integration of artificial intelligence ventures and its links to other Musk-led businesses have also drawn scrutiny from investors trying to assess capital allocation and related-party exposure.

Arabian Post – Crypto News Network

The article SpaceX debt move jolts post-IPO rally appeared first on Arabian Post.

Shares of the Elon Musk-led space and technology group extended their decline after the company moved into the bond market for the first time as a public company, seeking longer-term funding only days after a record-setting initial public offering. The sell-off left SpaceX trading below a $2 trillion valuation, after briefly approaching the $3 trillion mark during a post-listing surge.

The decline was striking in scale. The value erased from SpaceX was close to half of bitcoin’s roughly $1.3 trillion market capitalisation, yet bitcoin slipped by less than 1 per cent over the same stretch, holding near the low-$60,000 range. The comparison underscored how a company once treated by investors as a scarcity asset with exposure to rockets, satellites, artificial intelligence and defence-linked infrastructure was suddenly repriced more aggressively than the world’s largest cryptocurrency.

SpaceX shares had rallied sharply after their June 12 listing, helped by strong demand from retail and institutional investors seeking exposure to Starlink, Starship, defence contracts and Musk’s broader technology ecosystem. The IPO raised about $85.7 billion, making it one of the largest public offerings on record. The shares were priced at $135 and later climbed above $210 before the three-day retreat pulled them back towards the $150 level.

The immediate pressure followed plans for a senior unsecured notes offering, with proceeds expected to be used for general corporate purposes and repayment of bridge financing. The move unsettled investors because it came soon after the IPO and against a backdrop of heavy spending across Starship development, satellite networks, artificial intelligence infrastructure and related data-centre capacity.

SpaceX reported more than $100 billion in cash shortly before the bond sale, but the company is also carrying substantial funding needs tied to its expansion plans. It has been investing heavily in next-generation launch systems, satellite broadband, defence-related space services and computing infrastructure linked to artificial intelligence. That combination has created a debate over whether the company’s valuation reflects a realistic growth path or assumes near-perfect execution across several capital-intensive businesses.

The market reaction was also shaped by wider weakness in high-growth technology shares. Investors have become more cautious about companies whose valuations rely on long-dated earnings and large infrastructure spending. Expectations of tighter financial conditions in the United States added to pressure on richly valued equities, particularly firms associated with artificial intelligence and advanced computing.

SpaceX remains one of the world’s most valuable listed companies despite the decline. Its supporters argue that the company has unusually strong strategic assets, including reusable rocket technology, a dominant private launch business, Starlink’s global communications network and expanding government demand for space-based services. Its role in military, commercial and scientific launches gives it a market position that rivals would struggle to replicate quickly.

The sceptical view focuses on valuation, debt and execution risk. SpaceX generated revenue of about $18.7 billion last year but remained loss-making after heavy investment. Analysts have questioned whether its public-market valuation has moved too far ahead of operating earnings, particularly as investors assign high expectations to businesses that are still being built or scaled.

Musk retains overwhelming voting control through a dual-class share structure, a factor that has reassured some investors about strategic continuity while raising governance concerns among others. The company’s integration of artificial intelligence ventures and its links to other Musk-led businesses have also drawn scrutiny from investors trying to assess capital allocation and related-party exposure.

Arabian Post – Crypto News Network

The article SpaceX debt move jolts post-IPO rally appeared first on Arabian Post.

The Shinjuku-based company is consolidating digital asset operations under a “Neo Crypto Business” pillar, alongside its “Neo Media Entertainment Business”, as it seeks to become one of Japan’s most prominent corporate holders of XRP. The strategy builds on a board-approved plan to acquire ¥2.5 billion worth of XRP in stages and on wider crypto-related assets that have grown into a far larger balance-sheet priority.

The move marks a notable evolution for Gumi, which built its reputation on mobile gaming titles before expanding into Web3 investments, blockchain funds and digital asset management. The company’s latest approach treats XRP not only as a treasury asset but also as a functional tool for cross-border liquidity, infrastructure services, fund participation and yield generation.

Gumi’s XRP push is closely tied to its relationship with SBI Holdings, one of the most influential backers of Ripple-linked businesses in Japan. SBI has maintained a long-running partnership with Ripple and has supported XRP-related payment, remittance and tokenisation initiatives. Gumi has also invested alongside SBI in Evernorth, a US-based XRP treasury business that has sought to build a large institutional vehicle around the token.

The company’s strategy reflects a wider shift among listed firms experimenting with digital assets as part of treasury management. Earlier corporate crypto allocations were largely centred on Bitcoin as a store-of-value asset. Gumi’s approach is more operational, with XRP framed around payments utility, liquidity networks and active asset management rather than simple price appreciation.

Gumi has already disclosed a ¥1 billion Bitcoin purchase and has explored staking-based yield through blockchain networks. Its XRP plan is designed to diversify that exposure and connect the company to a token ecosystem that has a stronger payments narrative, especially in markets where Ripple-linked infrastructure has institutional support.

The company’s crypto asset balances expanded during the last financial year, aided by both direct holdings and fund-related exposure. Management has indicated that returns from the crypto business have become a meaningful part of earnings, although market volatility remains a clear risk. Crypto-linked gains can lift quarterly results sharply, but price declines can also create valuation pressure and impairments.

XRP was trading near $1.14 on Saturday, leaving the token well below the peaks reached during earlier market rallies. That price level underlines both the opportunity and the risk behind Gumi’s strategy. A larger XRP position could amplify gains if institutional demand strengthens, but it also exposes the company to swings in a market still shaped by regulatory shifts, liquidity cycles and broader investor sentiment toward digital assets.

Gumi’s restructuring also comes as Japan’s digital asset sector becomes more structured around licensed exchanges, tokenised securities, stablecoins and institutional custody. The regulatory environment has encouraged some companies to treat crypto assets as part of formal financial strategy rather than speculative side projects. That has created space for listed firms to pursue blockchain-linked revenue models while remaining under closer investor scrutiny.

The company’s plan includes node operations, asset management and fund participation, areas that could allow it to earn revenue from infrastructure and financial services rather than depending solely on token prices. A covered-call strategy has also been discussed as part of efforts to generate premium income while holding XRP, although such strategies carry risks if markets move sharply or liquidity conditions deteriorate.

The Evernorth connection gives Gumi exposure to a larger institutional XRP build-out. Evernorth has raised commitments from major digital asset and financial investors and has outlined plans to use XRP in treasury management, liquidity provisioning and decentralised finance activity. Its proposed public-market structure is designed to give investors regulated exposure to XRP without requiring them to hold tokens directly.

For Gumi, the gamble is that XRP’s role in settlement and liquidity infrastructure will expand as financial institutions test faster alternatives to legacy cross-border payment systems. Ripple and its partners have long promoted XRP as a bridge asset for international transfers, though adoption has varied by corridor, regulation and institutional appetite.

Arabian Post – Crypto News Network

The article Gumi sharpens XRP treasury push appeared first on Arabian Post.

The Dubai Gold and Commodities Exchange will introduce its Gold Spot T+0 Contract on Monday, 22 June, positioning the emirate as one of the few global centres offering exchange-based same-day settlement for physical bullion. The product is being presented as the GCC’s first regulated spot gold contract with T+0 settlement, a structure intended to reduce operational delays that remain common in over-the-counter bullion trading.

The contract is based on 1kg UAE Good Delivery gold and will be settled in UAE dirhams. Trades will be cleared through Dubai Commodities Clearing Corporation, the exchange’s clearing arm, while physical delivery will be routed through approved vault infrastructure. The model brings execution, central counterparty clearing and delivery into a single regulated framework, offering traders a more transparent alternative to bilateral settlement arrangements.

The launch comes as Dubai seeks to deepen its role in the international bullion trade, linking producers, refiners, banks, wholesalers and jewellery markets across Asia, Africa and Europe. The UAE has become one of the world’s largest physical gold trading hubs, supported by refining capacity, vaulting infrastructure, low-tax bullion trading, air connectivity and a large wholesale market centred on Dubai.

The new contract addresses three specific demands from market participants: faster settlement, greater price certainty and reduced operational friction. Same-day settlement allows participants to deploy capital more efficiently by shortening the time between trade execution and delivery. It can also reduce exposure to counterparty and price movement risks during the settlement window, particularly during periods of high volatility.

Ahmed Bin Sulayem, chairman and chief executive of DGCX, said Dubai’s gold market required faster and more transparent settlement tools as bullion flows expanded between East and West. “By bringing exchange trading, central clearing, and same-day physical settlement together within a regulated framework, we are providing market participants with greater certainty, improved efficiency, and direct access to physical delivery,” he said.

The contract is aimed at bullion dealers, refineries, brokers, clearing members and institutional participants rather than casual retail buyers. Its design gives physical traders a mechanism to match exchange-level price discovery with actual delivery, a feature that is particularly relevant for firms managing refinery output, wholesale inventory, hedging requirements or short-term liquidity needs.

DGCX said the product strengthens Dubai’s market infrastructure by creating a more robust benchmark for physical gold in the UAE. That objective has gained importance as global bullion trading becomes more sensitive to settlement speed, vault location and regulatory oversight. Exchanges and financial centres in Asia and the Middle East are competing to capture more physical gold flows as demand patterns shift eastward.

Gold markets have been shaped by strong investment demand, central bank buying and persistent geopolitical uncertainty. Global gold demand crossed 5,000 tonnes in 2025 for the first time, while gold-backed exchange-traded funds and bar-and-coin purchases rose sharply. Central banks remained large buyers, although the pace moderated from the exceptional levels recorded over the previous three years.

High prices have altered behaviour across the industry. Investment demand has strengthened, but jewellery consumption in several major markets has faced pressure as buyers adjust to elevated prices. For trade hubs such as Dubai, the changing mix of demand has increased the need for efficient wholesale, vaulting and settlement systems that can serve both physical and financial market participants.

The UAE’s foreign trade in precious metals reached nearly AED625 billion in 2024, up 27 per cent from the previous year, underlining the scale of the market that Dubai is attempting to serve with deeper exchange infrastructure. Gold passing through the UAE market has also supported a wider ecosystem of refiners, logistics providers, vault operators, brokers, banks and jewellery wholesalers.

DGCX has been expanding its precious metals suite as part of a broader effort to reinforce its role in regulated commodity trading. Its market activity grew in 2025, with total traded volumes rising 30 per cent year-on-year to 2,048,556 lots. The total value of contracts traded reached $46.96 billion, while average daily volumes rose to 7,940 lots and average open interest stood at 13,015 lots.

Arabian Post – Crypto News Network

The article DGCX sets same-day benchmark for gold trading appeared first on Arabian Post.

The operation centred on a Rust-based clipboard hijacker, known in cybercrime circles as a clipper, that monitors copied wallet addresses and silently replaces them with addresses controlled by the attacker. The malware was built for Windows and macOS and was hidden inside tools marketed to crypto traders and online gamblers seeking quick gains through Solana and Pump. fun sniper bots, Aviator predictors and crash-game prediction software.

The campaign marks a shift from conventional malware delivery towards a broader reputation-building strategy. Instead of relying only on hidden payloads or phishing lures, the actor created a public-facing ecosystem designed to withstand casual scrutiny. Victims checking GitHub stars, SourceForge downloads, YouTube tutorials, news-style promotional posts or VirusTotal comments could find what appeared to be signs of legitimacy.

Check Point Research traced the activity to a single threat actor using a WordPress phishing site as the main hub. The site directed visitors to GitHub, SourceForge and YouTube pages carrying the same branding and download links. A Telegram contact using the handle @JoseCmanXD appeared across parts of the network, helping connect the website, videos and promotional material.

The malicious files were promoted as software that could automate trading or predict betting outcomes. Such themes are frequently used to target users already prepared to install unverified tools, disable security warnings or overlook suspicious behaviour in the hope of financial advantage. The campaign’s likely victim pool included crypto holders, meme-coin traders and online gambling users.

On GitHub, at least six accounts appeared to promote or distribute the software, with some repositories showing inflated engagement. One repository displayed 146 stars and 62 forks, figures that would ordinarily suggest community interest. The accounts identified in the operation included Decryptor-j, crash-predictor1, roblox-script1, hack-scripts and stake-mines. GitHub downloads linked to the known accounts exceeded 5,000, including more than 1,250 downloads of a macOS version of Aviator Predictor.

SourceForge activity showed a larger distortion. The relevant projects displayed 44,485 downloads, but 37,460 were attributed to Android devices despite the actor offering only Windows and macOS versions. That mismatch points to artificial traffic generation, possibly through an Android device farm used to inflate download counters and create false credibility.

The YouTube element added another layer of social proof. A dedicated channel with more than 91,000 subscribers promoted the tools through tutorial-style videos using AI-generated narrators. View counts showed unusual spikes rather than steady organic growth, while comment sections carried highly positive responses that appeared coordinated. Some comments from likely real users complained that the promoted tools did not work as advertised.

The malware itself is technically straightforward but effective. On Windows, victims downloaded ZIP archives containing multiple files, though the main execution path led to a. NET loader that launched a Rust-built executable. The payload copied itself into the user’s application data folder and created a startup shortcut, allowing it to run automatically after login. Once active, it continuously scanned the clipboard for wallet address formats and swapped matches with attacker-controlled addresses drawn from embedded lists.

The macOS version followed the same objective, targeting users who believed they were installing trading or prediction tools. Because crypto transfers are irreversible and wallet addresses are long strings that many users verify only partially, clipboard hijacking can succeed even when a victim believes the transaction details have been checked.

The operation also sought to manipulate security reputation systems. Some malware samples received benign votes and favourable comments on VirusTotal, reducing the chance that wary users would treat low detection scores as suspicious. That tactic raises concern for security teams that depend partly on crowdsourced reputation signals when triaging files.

The use of promotional posts on legitimate news websites and press-release networks further broadened the campaign’s reach. Several such posts appear to have been published on the same day, April 27, 2026, before many were removed. Their purpose was to place malicious tools beside trusted content and search-indexed pages, strengthening the illusion that the software had public validation.

Arabian Post – Crypto News Network

The article Fake trust network pushes crypto-stealing clipper appeared first on Arabian Post.

The digital-asset infrastructure group says its Crypto-as-a-Service platform can give eligible banks, fintechs and crypto businesses a way to keep offering wallet, custody and trading functions across Europe without building a full regulated stack before the deadline. The proposal is aimed at firms that can meet onboarding, customer due-diligence and operational standards, but either lack a Markets in Crypto-Assets licence or are still awaiting a final decision from a national supervisor.

BitGo Europe GmbH, based in Frankfurt, received its MiCA licence from Germany’s Federal Financial Supervisory Authority in May 2025. Its current European permissions cover transfer services, custody and administration, qualified crypto custody, exchange of crypto assets for money or other crypto assets, order execution and reception and transmission of orders on behalf of clients.

The timing has given BitGo a commercial opening. MiCA, agreed in 2023 and phased in from 2024, is replacing a patchwork of national crypto regimes with a common rulebook covering authorisation, governance, capital, safeguarding, market abuse and consumer disclosure. Existing providers that relied on national registrations before 30 December 2024 were allowed temporary relief in some jurisdictions, but that grandfathering ends across Europe on 1 July. Providers without authorisation are expected to stop serving EU clients and execute wind-down plans, including client notices and asset transfers to authorised firms or self-hosted wallets.

BitGo’s model is designed to make migration less disruptive. Its platform uses APIs and webhooks to let a client company embed crypto functions into its own interface while BitGo Europe provides regulated infrastructure behind the scenes. The package includes know-your-customer flows, multi-asset wallets, qualified custody, SEPA on- and off-ramps, trading, settlement, policy controls and customer-asset insurance coverage of up to $250m.

Chief Executive Mike Belshe has framed the offer as a route for firms that already operate wallets but do not yet hold their own MiCA licence. “All of your clients can be onboarded and have sub-accounts inside of BitGo,” he said, while stressing that the client company would still handle customer support and products. The structure means the end user may remain with the familiar brand, while assets are placed in segregated custody under a licensed provider.

The pitch also reflects the new balance of power in Europe’s crypto market. Larger groups that have secured licences, including Coinbase, Kraken, Crypto. com, OKX and Bitstamp, can continue to compete under the passporting system. Smaller exchanges, wallet providers and brokerages face a narrower set of choices: obtain approval, restrict services, sell or migrate customers to a licensed platform.

Regulators have signalled limited tolerance for last-minute fixes. France’s market watchdog warned firms that unlicensed activity after the deadline could trigger blacklisting and legal action. Earlier checks in France showed that, among about 90 locally registered companies without a MiCA licence, roughly 30 per cent had applied, 40 per cent were not seeking authorisation and 30 per cent had not clearly set out their plans. That pattern suggests a compliance gap that infrastructure providers are trying to fill.

The uncertainty is not confined to smaller operators. Binance, the world’s largest crypto exchange by trading volume, has been pursuing a MiCA licence in Greece and has said it will update users before 30 June. Its position has become a test case for whether Europe’s new framework can combine uniform market access with consistent supervision by national regulators.

For BitGo, the opportunity is both regulatory and strategic. The company listed in New York in January after raising $212.8m in its initial public offering, and its European expansion adds a recurring infrastructure business at a point when custody, staking and trading revenues are tied to market cycles. A CaaS model could deepen ties with regulated financial institutions that want crypto exposure without taking on the full compliance burden.

Arabian Post – Crypto News Network

The article BitGo opens MiCA route for strained crypto firms appeared first on Arabian Post.

The move lifted UNI to about $3.60, extending a sharp weekly advance and making it one of the strongest performers among larger crypto assets. Bitcoin traded near $65,000–$66,000, little changed after a choppy rebound, while traders shifted capital toward tokens with clearer narratives around exchange revenue, tokenisation and on-chain trading infrastructure.

Standard Chartered’s call placed a $100 target on UNI by the end of 2030, implying a dramatic rise from levels around $2.50 when the forecast was framed. The bank’s staged path envisages UNI at $6.50 by the end of 2026, then $20 in 2027, $40 in 2028 and $65 in 2029, before reaching the end-decade target. The thesis rests on expectations that tokenised assets used in decentralised finance will expand sharply and that Uniswap will remain a core venue for their trading.

The rally came as altcoins drew attention away from bitcoin. Hyperliquid’s HYPE traded near record territory after touching above $76, with its year-to-date gain approaching 200 per cent. Solana also benefited from the broader bid for networks and tokens tied to trading activity, faster settlement and institutional experimentation. The rotation suggested that risk appetite had not vanished from crypto markets, but had become more selective after weeks of pressure on bitcoin and ether-linked funds.

Bitcoin’s hesitation reflected a more cautious macro backdrop. The Federal Reserve’s June 16-17 meeting marked Kevin Warsh’s first as chair, with investors expecting no immediate change in interest rates but watching for any shift in language on inflation, balance-sheet policy and rate projections. Warsh took office in May after confirmation by the US Senate and was selected as chair of the Federal Open Market Committee, giving the meeting added weight for global risk assets.

Oil provided a counterweight to inflation concerns. Brent crude fell below $80 a barrel, touching levels not seen for more than three months, after developments around a US-Iran framework raised expectations of improved supply flows through the Strait of Hormuz and a possible easing of sanctions pressure on Iranian exports. Lower energy prices tend to help growth-sensitive assets, but crypto traders remained wary of the Fed’s tone because higher-for-longer policy would keep pressure on speculative markets.

The UNI move also reflects a shift in how investors are valuing decentralised exchanges. For years, UNI traded largely as a governance token with limited direct economic linkage to Uniswap’s trading volumes. That changed after fee-switch and burn proposals gained traction, offering a route for protocol activity to influence token supply. Uniswap v4, launched in January 2025, added “hooks” that allow developers to customise liquidity pools, fees and trading logic, strengthening the case that the protocol could function as programmable market infrastructure rather than a simple swap venue.

The tokenisation narrative has added another layer. Citi’s latest industry work places tokenised assets at a $5.5 trillion base case by 2030, with a higher scenario near $8 trillion. Much of that activity is expected to begin with public securities, treasuries, collateral and private-market instruments, rather than purely crypto-native assets. For decentralised exchanges, the question is whether those assets will trade on open blockchain rails or remain inside bank-controlled platforms.

That distinction is central to the Uniswap thesis. A bank-led tokenisation boom could validate blockchain settlement without sending meaningful liquidity to open DeFi venues. Conversely, if tokenised money-market funds, equities, credit instruments and collateral move into composable on-chain markets, Uniswap and similar platforms could capture more trading activity. Standard Chartered’s forecast leans toward the latter outcome, but execution, regulation and institutional comfort remain significant uncertainties.

Risks remain substantial. UNI is still far below the highs reached during the previous crypto cycle, and a 2030 target does little to protect traders from near-term volatility. DeFi protocols also face competition from centralised exchanges, app-specific chains, perpetual futures platforms and bank-built settlement networks. Tokenised assets may carry legal rights, custody structures and redemption terms that differ sharply from ordinary crypto tokens, making liquidity and investor protection harder to assess.

Arabian Post – Crypto News Network

The article Uniswap rally revives altcoin appetite appeared first on Arabian Post.

The agreement, announced on 16 June, sets out a framework for Tether to work with DMCC on blockchain-based communication and payment infrastructure, advisory support for tokenisation, crypto payments and digital asset settlements. It also creates a pathway for the two organisations to become ecosystem partners across relevant events, publications and member-facing channels.

The move links Tether with a business district that hosts more than 26,000 member companies, including more than 4,000 technology firms. DMCC, which oversees one of Dubai’s main commodities and enterprise hubs, has been positioning its Crypto Centre as a bridge between physical trade, financial services and Web3 infrastructure.

Under the MoU, Tether is expected to engage with DMCC’s member network through education programmes, industry events, hackathons and knowledge-sharing sessions. The initiative is also designed to explore potential member benefits and practical business applications for digital settlement tools, rather than limiting cooperation to policy-level engagement.

Ahmed Bin Sulayem, DMCC’s Executive Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, said global trade was entering an era in which payments, financial infrastructure and asset ownership were moving onto “digital rails”. He said stablecoins were already processing trillions of dollars in transaction value, while tokenisation was beginning to reshape how real-world assets are financed and transferred across borders.

Paolo Ardoino, Tether’s Chief Executive Officer, said the UAE was shaping how digital asset infrastructure is adopted in global markets and connected with “real economic activity”. He said the collaboration with DMCC would focus on practical blockchain use cases, including tokenisation, education and tools that widen participation in digital markets.

The partnership comes as Dubai sharpens its role as a regulated centre for virtual assets. The emirate’s Virtual Assets Regulatory Authority oversees virtual asset activity across Dubai’s mainland and free zones, excluding the Dubai International Financial Centre, while the Central Bank’s Payment Token Services Regulation has set national rules for stablecoins used as payment instruments.

DMCC has already deepened its engagement with regulators and market participants on tokenised trade. Its earlier agreement with the Dubai Virtual Assets Regulatory Authority focused on tokenised commodities, industry data and policy development, with an emphasis on gold, diamonds and other real-world assets that can be represented digitally under controlled frameworks.

Tether’s entry into this layer of Dubai’s commercial ecosystem is significant because USDT remains the dominant dollar-linked stablecoin used by crypto exchanges, traders and payment intermediaries. Stablecoins are designed to maintain a steady value against fiat currencies and are increasingly being tested for cross-border settlement, treasury management and digital commerce.

The company’s latest reserve figures underline its scale. Tether reported first-quarter net profit of $1.04bn, total assets of about $191.7bn and liabilities of about $183.5bn, with an excess reserve buffer of $8.23bn. Its reserves remain heavily exposed to US Treasury instruments, alongside holdings in gold and bitcoin.

That scale also brings scrutiny. Tether publishes quarterly attestations of reserves, but those are not the same as a full financial audit. Regulators and central bankers have warned that stablecoins can pose risks around liquidity, consumer protection, illicit finance and market fragmentation if oversight differs sharply across jurisdictions.

For Dubai, the DMCC-Tether MoU fits a broader strategy to connect commodities, capital and technology. The emirate has sought to attract exchanges, custodians, fintech platforms and blockchain developers while building rules intended to reassure institutions that digital asset activity can be conducted under formal supervision.

The immediate impact is likely to be educational and exploratory rather than a direct launch of new financial products. The wording of the MoU points to workshops, advisory engagement, hackathons and potential ecosystem benefits, leaving commercial deployment subject to regulatory approvals, business demand and risk controls.

Arabian Post – Crypto News Network

The article DMCC and Tether advance Dubai tokenisation push appeared first on Arabian Post.

The Securitize Tokenized AAA CLO Fund, known as STAC, will now be available to eligible investors through Solana, with Ethena Labs planning a $250 million allocation. The commitment ranks among the largest planned deployments into tokenised structured credit on the Solana ecosystem and signals a broader shift by crypto-native finance platforms toward regulated, income-generating real-world assets.

STAC is designed to provide exposure to AAA-rated collateralised loan obligations, a part of the credit market that has long been used by institutional investors seeking floating-rate income. The fund invests substantially all of its assets in US dollar-denominated AAA-rated CLO tranches sourced from primary and secondary markets, using a fundamentals-driven strategy without leverage. The structure aims to combine conventional credit selection with digital securities infrastructure that can support faster settlement, clearer recordkeeping and blockchain-based ownership.

BNY serves as custodian for the fund’s underlying assets, while BNY Investments acts as sub-adviser through its structured-credit capabilities. That arrangement gives the product a traditional finance backbone at a time when tokenisation platforms are trying to reassure investors that blockchain wrappers do not replace core requirements around custody, compliance, asset selection and legal enforceability.

The fund was launched in October 2025 with services provided by BNY and a planned $100 million anchor allocation from Grove, a credit infrastructure protocol linked to the Sky ecosystem. Its Solana rollout widens distribution beyond its original Ethereum-based availability and places STAC inside one of the most active blockchain environments for stablecoins, decentralised exchanges and high-frequency on-chain transactions.

Securitize has positioned the expansion as part of a push to bring higher-grade fixed-income products into blockchain markets. The company says eligible investors can subscribe through its regulated platform, with fund shares issued as digital securities and subject to know-your-customer, anti-money-laundering and investor accreditation checks. That compliance layer is central to Securitize’s model, which differs from many lightly regulated token offerings aimed at retail crypto users.

The timing is significant. Tokenised real-world assets have moved from a niche experiment into a visible part of digital finance, led by US Treasury products, private credit, commodities and money-market-style funds. On-chain real-world assets now account for tens of billions of dollars in distributed value, while tokenised credit has grown into a multi-billion-dollar segment as asset managers, custodians and blockchain platforms compete to make traditional instruments more usable in digital markets.

Ethena’s planned allocation also reflects a changing approach among decentralised finance operators that previously relied heavily on crypto collateral and derivatives-based yield strategies. By allocating to an AAA CLO fund, Ethena is seeking exposure to a credit product that may provide income and diversification while remaining compatible with blockchain settlement. Ethena operates the USDe and USDtb ecosystem and has been widening the mix of assets used across its financial infrastructure.

For Solana, the launch strengthens its effort to attract institutional capital beyond trading and consumer-facing crypto applications. The network has built a reputation for high throughput and low transaction costs, attributes that are attractive for products requiring frequent movement, settlement or collateral use. Its ecosystem already hosts significant stablecoin liquidity and decentralised finance activity, but institutional-grade tokenised funds remain a contested arena dominated by issuers that must satisfy both securities rules and blockchain users’ expectations for speed and transparency.

The broader CLO market exceeds $1.3 trillion across the US and Europe, making it one of the largest structured-credit segments available for tokenisation. AAA CLO tranches sit at the top of the capital structure and are typically viewed as lower-risk than subordinated CLO debt, though they remain exposed to credit deterioration, market volatility, interest-rate shifts and liquidity constraints. A tokenised wrapper does not remove those risks or guarantee secondary-market trading depth.

Arabian Post – Crypto News Network

The article Securitize takes STAC fund onto Solana appeared first on Arabian Post.

The move links one of the best-known blockchain payments companies with a global card network seeking to define how machine-to-machine commerce should work as artificial intelligence systems begin buying data, computing power, logistics services and digital tools on behalf of businesses. Mastercard launched Agent Pay for Machines, or AP4M, on 10 June as a service designed to make automated transactions permissioned, orchestrated and settled at machine speed across its network.

The programme is aimed at high-frequency, low-value payments, including transactions worth fractions of a cent, where traditional point-of-sale systems are poorly suited. Mastercard says the service supports credentialing, permissioning, transaction routing and settlement across multiple payment types, including cards, bank accounts and stablecoins. More than 30 participants and supporters are involved at launch, including Adyen, Ant International, BVNK, Checkout. com, Cloudflare, Coinbase, Global Payments, OKX, Polygon, Solana Foundation, Stripe, Tempo and Ripple.

For Ripple, participation gives its institutional blockchain infrastructure a place in an emerging segment of digital commerce where payment speed, auditability and compliance controls are expected to matter as much as transaction cost. The company’s role centres on the XRP Ledger and Ripple USD, known as RLUSD, a dollar-pegged stablecoin designed to maintain a one-to-one value with the US dollar and issued on the XRP Ledger and Ethereum.

Markus Infanger, senior vice-president of RippleX, said autonomous agents were already settling invoices and paying for computing resources, but institutions could only move at that pace if controls moved with them. He said XRPL and RLUSD were built so enterprises could let agents transact at machine speed within rules enforced on-chain, with settlement in seconds, predictable costs, programmable compliance and a full audit trail.

The announcement follows Mastercard’s 3 June move to expand settlement capabilities to include regulated stablecoins, intraday settlement, weekend processing and holiday settlement options. That plan listed Ripple’s RLUSD alongside Circle’s USDC, Paxos-issued PYUSD, USDG and USDP, and SoFiUSD, with supported blockchain networks including Arbitrum, Base, Canton, Ethereum, Polygon, Solana, Tempo and XRPL. The sequence shows Mastercard building a broader settlement framework in which stablecoins are treated as one option within regulated payment infrastructure rather than a parallel system outside it.

Jorn Lambert, Mastercard’s chief product officer, said Agent Pay for Machines could create conditions for a “superbloom” of AI business models by allowing services to be bought and sold among agents at very high volumes, very small values, very fast speeds and low latency. The company has framed AP4M as an extension of its earlier Agent Pay work, which focused on trusted AI agents participating in payments, while AP4M targets continuous background transactions between systems.

The business cases being tested include digital services that charge by usage, AI agents buying data from websites, logistics systems paying for freight services and warehouse access, and enterprise software agents coordinating payments across multiple providers. These examples reflect a shift from single, user-initiated transactions towards chains of automated purchases triggered by one instruction, such as building an online shop, arranging a shipment or sourcing cloud resources.

The timing is significant for stablecoin issuers and payments groups. The stablecoin market is now above $315bn, with dollar-linked tokens dominating liquidity in crypto markets and gaining attention from banks, fintech companies and treasury teams seeking faster settlement. Institutional adoption, however, still depends on reserve quality, redemption rights, sanctions controls, cyber security, dispute handling and clear regulatory treatment.

Ripple has positioned RLUSD as an enterprise-grade stablecoin fully backed by segregated reserves of cash and cash equivalents, redeemable one-to-one for US dollars, with availability dependent on jurisdiction. BNY was named in 2025 as primary reserve custodian for RLUSD, reinforcing Ripple’s effort to market the token to regulated institutions rather than only crypto-native users.

Mastercard’s partnership model suggests the company is trying to avoid a closed standard for agentic commerce. AP4M brings together payment processors, stablecoin issuers, blockchain networks, custody firms, identity providers and developer platforms, reflecting the view that machine payments will require common rules for authorisation, spending limits, traceability and liability.

Arabian Post – Crypto News Network

The article Ripple backs Mastercard push into machine payments appeared first on Arabian Post.

The funding round was co-led by Paradigm, a16z crypto and Ribbit Capital, with participation from Apollo Funds, Circle Ventures, VanEck, Ledger Cathay, Variant, Wintermute Ventures, Prelude, IOSG, HashKey, Mirana, NJJ Capital, SBI Group and Bpifrance. The raise ranks among the largest private financings in decentralised finance and reflects a renewed institutional appetite for blockchain-based lending platforms that can handle customised credit products rather than speculative trading alone.

Morpho Association, which supports the open credit network, said the capital would be used to expand the protocol’s role as a blockchain-based marketplace where lenders, borrowers, fintech platforms and asset managers can create and access tailored lending markets. The move comes as tokenised assets, stablecoins and onchain money-market products gain traction among financial institutions seeking faster settlement, programmable collateral and more transparent market operations.

The round values the protocol at up to about $2 billion, based on market pricing around its native token. Morpho’s total value locked is estimated at more than $6 billion, placing it among the largest decentralised lending protocols by deposits. Its growth has been driven by vaults and markets that allow users and businesses to define their own collateral, interest-rate models and risk parameters instead of relying on a single pooled lending design.

The investment also signals a widening contest over the next phase of decentralised finance. Early DeFi lending was dominated by broad liquidity pools, where borrowers and depositors interacted through algorithmic rates. Morpho’s model is more modular, allowing professional market participants to create isolated lending markets and curated vaults with differentiated risk profiles. That architecture has made it attractive to firms exploring credit products that resemble traditional finance but operate on blockchain rails.

The protocol’s backers include investors with strong exposure to both financial technology and crypto infrastructure. Ribbit Capital has long invested across fintech and digital-asset platforms, while a16z crypto and Paradigm have been among the most active venture firms in blockchain networks, stablecoin systems and decentralised applications. The presence of Apollo-linked funds, VanEck and Circle Ventures adds a further institutional layer to the deal, underlining the push to connect private credit, tokenised assets and blockchain settlement.

Morpho was launched in 2022 and first gained attention as a peer-to-peer optimisation layer for lending markets. It later evolved into a more flexible infrastructure stack, with Morpho Blue and Morpho Vaults allowing developers and curators to design lending markets with specific collateral and liquidation rules. In 2025, Morpho V2 added fixed-rate and fixed-term lending features, a key requirement for institutions that need defined maturity dates, predictable borrowing costs and more familiar credit structures.

The funding comes at a time when global credit markets are being re-examined through the lens of tokenisation. Private credit, Treasury products, money-market funds and other real-world assets have moved steadily onto blockchain networks, though adoption remains uneven. Advocates argue that onchain credit can reduce operational friction, improve auditability and allow collateral to move across platforms more efficiently. Sceptics point to smart-contract risk, liquidity concentration, regulatory uncertainty and the danger of treating total value locked as a proxy for safety.

Those risks remain material. DeFi lending platforms have faced market shocks, oracle failures, governance disputes and liquidation cascades during periods of volatility. Institutional users are also unlikely to move substantial credit activity onchain without clear compliance structures, robust risk controls and reliable counterparties. Morpho’s challenge will be to scale without diluting the openness that made it attractive to crypto-native users, while meeting the standards expected by regulated financial firms.

The competitive field is intensifying. Aave remains a dominant player in decentralised lending, while Spark, Compound, Euler and other protocols are refining their own approaches to capital efficiency and risk isolation. Morpho’s pitch is that credit markets should become permissionless infrastructure, where different businesses can build specialised lending products on top of shared smart contracts rather than creating closed systems from scratch.

The new capital gives Morpho greater resources to hire, expand integrations and support developers building financial applications on its network. It also provides a signal to banks, asset managers and fintech firms that large investors expect onchain credit to move beyond experimental pilots.

Arabian Post – Crypto News Network

The article Morpho raises funds for onchain credit push appeared first on Arabian Post.

MUFG Bank, Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation and Mizuho Bank will establish a council to examine operating rules, governance, issuance procedures and systems needed for the launch. The initiative brings together the banking arms of Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group and Mizuho Financial Group, which collectively serve a vast corporate client base across Japan and overseas markets.

The planned issuance marks a significant step in Japan’s effort to modernise payments through blockchain-based settlement while keeping the activity within the regulated banking system. Stablecoins are digital tokens designed to maintain a fixed value against a fiat currency such as the yen or the dollar, allowing near-instant settlement and lower transaction friction compared with traditional correspondent banking routes.

The project is expected to begin with yen-denominated stablecoins, with the possibility of wider currency use if operational and regulatory conditions are met. The banks are examining a common standard so that corporate clients can transfer stablecoins across participating institutions without being locked into a single bank platform. That interoperability is central to the commercial case, as fragmented digital currencies would do little to improve Japan’s existing settlement infrastructure.

Japan’s Financial Services Agency has been supporting the experimental phase through its fintech framework, reflecting official interest in using blockchain to improve payment efficiency while preserving anti-money laundering controls, redemption rights and reserve discipline. The country’s legal framework already treats certain stablecoins as electronic payment instruments, a category that permits issuance by banks, trust banks and licensed fund transfer service providers under defined conditions.

The initiative follows an earlier proof-of-concept involving the same banking groups, with Progmat providing infrastructure support for stablecoin issuance and cross-border payment testing. Mitsubishi Corporation was identified as a major corporate user case in trials involving payments between domestic and overseas locations, offering a practical test of whether tokenised settlement can reduce delays and costs in multinational treasury operations.

The timing is notable because Japan has traditionally remained heavily reliant on cash, bank transfers and credit cards, even as policymakers and financial institutions have promoted cashless payments. Bank-backed stablecoins could appeal first to companies rather than retail users, particularly for treasury management, supplier settlement, inter-company remittances and securities-related transactions.

The move also follows the launch of JPYC, the first yen-pegged stablecoin fully convertible into yen, which began issuance in October 2025. JPYC is backed by domestic savings and government bonds, and its arrival demonstrated that yen-based stablecoins can operate under Japan’s regulatory structure. The megabank initiative, however, carries a different scale because of the banks’ balance sheets, client relationships and integration with mainstream payment systems.

Globally, stablecoins have shifted from a crypto trading tool toward a broader payments and settlement instrument. Dollar-pegged tokens still dominate the market, with Tether and USDC accounting for the overwhelming share of circulation. The total stablecoin market has expanded into the hundreds of billions of dollars, helped by clearer regulation in several jurisdictions and rising interest from banks, payment firms and asset managers.

Japan’s push comes as policymakers in Asia examine whether local-currency stablecoins can reduce reliance on dollar settlement and support faster regional trade payments. A ruling party panel has called for greater use of yen-based stablecoins in Asian settlement, aligning the banks’ plans with a wider policy debate over the international role of the yen.

Regulatory caution remains a central issue. Stablecoins can move money quickly across platforms and borders, but supervisors are concerned about reserve quality, redemption risk, cyber security, sanctions compliance and the possibility that funds could migrate outside conventional bank deposits. Japan’s model seeks to address those concerns by keeping issuance close to licensed institutions and subjecting intermediaries to registration and compliance rules.

Arabian Post – Crypto News Network

The article Japan megabanks prepare joint stablecoin launch appeared first on Arabian Post.

Arabian Post – Crypto News Network

The article Trad.Fi advances blockchain lending plan appeared first on Arabian Post.

The breach exposed a critical weakness in one of the fastest-rising digital identity ventures in the crypto market, where projects promise privacy-preserving proof of personhood but still depend on secure operational controls around bridges, liquidity pools and treasury-linked wallets. H fell from around $0.67 before the sell-off to levels near $0.07, with trading data showing a brief drop toward $0.05 before some recovery.

Founder Terence Kwok said the project had detected a security incident involving the compromise of private keys belonging to a member of the Humanity Foundation. Users were told not to interact with the bridge or any liquidity pools until the team confirms that activity is safe. The project said it was working with security specialists and exchanges while the investigation continues.

On-chain tracking showed at least 17 wallets that had interacted with Humanity Protocol were affected. The stolen assets were rapidly moved through decentralised markets, with large volumes of H swapped into ether and BNB. Analysts also flagged the minting of additional H tokens on BNB Chain, a step that intensified selling pressure and deepened the price slide.

The incident has placed renewed scrutiny on the operational structure behind Humanity Protocol, which markets itself as a privacy-first identity network built around biometric verification and zero-knowledge proofs. Its system is designed to allow users to prove they are real people without exposing full personal data to centralised databases, a pitch that gained traction as artificial intelligence, bots and deepfakes raised concern over digital trust.

Humanity Protocol had been drawing strong market attention before the breach. H rallied sharply in early June, supported by speculative demand for identity and AI-linked crypto assets, exchange listings and anticipation around ecosystem growth. That momentum reversed as traders reacted to the scale of the wallet drains and uncertainty over whether additional funds or smart-contract functions remained exposed.

The sharp fall in H also underlined the liquidity risks attached to tokens with concentrated holdings and heavy dependence on market-maker activity. When confidence breaks in such assets, forced selling, thin order books and arbitrage across chains can produce unusually steep intraday price moves. The crash wiped hundreds of millions of dollars from implied market value in hours, leaving investors exposed to both direct losses and wider uncertainty over the project’s governance controls.

Questions are now centred on how a foundation-linked private key gained access to assets or functions capable of causing such extensive damage. Private-key compromises are among the most damaging forms of crypto security failure because they can allow attackers to move funds without exploiting a flaw in the underlying smart contract code. Unlike bugs that can sometimes be paused or patched quickly, stolen signing authority can be used immediately unless permissions are revoked, contracts are paused or exchange-level monitoring blocks fund flows.

The breach also comes at a sensitive time for digital identity projects. Protocols in this segment are seeking to solve a growing problem in online services: distinguishing human users from automated agents while preserving privacy. Humanity Protocol has positioned itself in the same broad field as proof-of-personhood networks that use biometrics, cryptography and token incentives to build identity layers for Web3 applications.

That model carries a reputational burden. Projects handling identity claims must convince users and partners that security standards are robust not only at the cryptographic level but also in treasury management, key custody, bridge administration and incident response. Tuesday’s attack showed that a privacy-oriented protocol can still be vulnerable if privileged operational keys are compromised.

The fallout may also draw attention from exchanges and market surveillance teams because stolen tokens were reportedly sold quickly into open markets. Exchanges that list H are expected to review deposits, trading activity and suspicious wallet flows. Liquidity providers could also reassess exposure until the project clarifies whether affected permissions have been revoked and whether additional wallets remain at risk.

Some on-chain investigators have questioned whether the explanation fully accounts for the pattern of transfers, citing the scale of affected wallets and the speed of the subsequent token sales. The project has not publicly confirmed a final loss figure, and the estimates remained fluid as wallet monitoring continued through the day.

Arabian Post – Crypto News Network

The article Humanity breach sends H token tumbling appeared first on Arabian Post.

The House Ways and Means Committee has placed six numbered bills and a related discussion draft before a full committee hearing on digital asset taxation scheduled for June 9 at 2pm ET in the Longworth House Office Building. The hearing brings together senior tax and policy representatives from Fidelity Investments, Coinbase, Coin Center and the Tax Law Center at NYU Law, signalling a broader attempt to turn years of fragmented guidance into statutory rules.

The measures reflect a sharper push in Washington to align tax treatment with the growing use of blockchain assets in payments, investing and network infrastructure. Crypto companies have long argued that existing tax rules, built largely around property and securities concepts, leave users facing complex reporting obligations even for small transfers, network fees or rewards that may not be readily convertible into cash.

The package includes the Less Tax Paperwork for Digital Asset Owners Act, introduced by Representative Rudy Yakym, which seeks to reduce reporting friction for digital asset holders. Its provisions cover de minimis network fees, simplified accounting for widely traded digital assets, treatment of dollar-backed stablecoin transactions, broker requirements and definitions. One provision would exclude certain network fees of up to $10 from gain or loss recognition, while another would allow taxpayers to use simplified accounting for qualifying traded tokens.

Representative Mike Carey’s Tax Clarity for Mining and Staking Act addresses one of the industry’s most contested issues: whether newly created tokens from mining or staking should be taxed when received or when disposed of. Under the proposal, taxpayers could defer recognition of income from certain mining and staking rewards, a change intended to ease what market participants describe as a liquidity mismatch when tax is due before a token is sold.

Charitable giving is covered by Representative Mike Kelly’s Charitable Deductions for Digital Asset Donations Act. The bill would exempt certain digital asset donations from appraisal requirements that can add cost and delay for donors. Supporters say the proposal could make crypto giving easier for charities and contributors, while tax specialists are expected to examine whether safeguards are sufficient to protect valuation accuracy.

Representative David Kustoff’s Providing Analogous Rules for Digital Assets Act would extend familiar tax concepts to digital asset trading. The measure seeks to clarify how existing rules should apply to transactions involving digital tokens, including areas where securities rules have not always mapped neatly on to blockchain-based assets.

Representative Aaron Bean’s Digital Assets Voluntary Disclosure Program Act would establish a disclosure route for taxpayers seeking to correct past non-compliance. Such programmes are often designed to encourage taxpayers to come forward before enforcement action, though their effect depends heavily on penalty terms, eligibility rules and administrative capacity.

Representative Jodey Arrington’s Applying Existing Tax Anti-Abuse Rules to Digital Assets Act would bring wash-sale and constructive-sale rules into the crypto market. At present, digital assets have often fallen outside rules that prevent taxpayers from selling an asset at a loss and quickly buying back a substantially identical position. Applying these rules could narrow a tax-planning avenue used by active traders, but it may also increase compliance demands for exchanges and investors.

A separate discussion draft titled End Digital Assets Tax Shelters Act would add an enforcement-focused element to the package. It indicates that lawmakers are not only responding to industry calls for relief but also trying to prevent gaps in the tax code from being used to avoid federal revenue obligations.

The proposals arrive as digital asset regulation has become a larger part of the United States policy agenda, with parallel debates over stablecoin oversight, market structure and the role of federal agencies. Tax clarity is viewed by exchanges, asset managers and blockchain developers as a necessary step if the country is to compete with jurisdictions that have adopted more tailored regimes for digital assets.

Arabian Post – Crypto News Network

The article US tax writers advance crypto bills appeared first on Arabian Post.

SAHARA fell from about $0.038 to an intraday low near $0.0129, then recovered to around $0.016 as heavy trading continued across major venues, including Binance. Turnover exceeded $250 million, a level far above the token’s market capitalisation at points during the session, signalling a disorderly market move driven by panic selling, forced exits and speculation over wallet activity.

The immediate concern centred on transfers involving 600 million SAHARA tokens. On-chain watchers flagged the movements as coming from wallets associated with the project, prompting claims that insiders or early stakeholders may have moved supply into the market. For a token already trading far below its 2025 peak, the appearance of a large supply shift was enough to unsettle investors and deepen the decline.

Sahara AI rejected suggestions of team or investor selling. The project said team and investor allocations remained untouched on-chain and that no such tokens had been sold or moved. It said the 600 million tokens cited by traders were part of a pre-scheduled deposit into a Chainlink CCIP bridge contract to provide liquidity for transfers between Ethereum and BNB Chain.

The explanation pointed to a technical upgrade rather than an open-market sale. Sahara AI enabled cross-chain SAHARA transfers through Chainlink’s Cross-Chain Interoperability Protocol in early June, allowing holders to move tokens between Ethereum and BNB Chain. The project said the bridge liquidity operation had been planned in advance and added that a further 150 million tokens were still scheduled for the same purpose.

That clarification eased some fears but did not fully settle the market debate. The central issue for investors is not only whether the transfers were legitimate, but whether communication around large token movements was clear enough in a market where wallet flows are scrutinised in real time. Crypto traders often react first and verify later, particularly when a token has a concentrated supply structure or a short trading history.

Sahara AI also said there were no security issues affecting its token contracts or products. The project opened an internal review into the volatility and said it was monitoring trading activity. On-chain contract data appeared consistent with the project’s explanation that at least part of the transfer activity was linked to bridge liquidity, though that does not by itself identify the sellers behind the market fall.

The sell-off adds pressure on Sahara AI at a sensitive point in its development cycle. The platform markets itself as an artificial intelligence-focused blockchain network designed to support decentralised data, compute and agent services. Its backers have included prominent crypto investors, and the project has sought to position SAHARA as a utility token for AI infrastructure rather than a purely speculative asset.

Market performance has told a more difficult story. SAHARA remains sharply below its July 2025 high of about $0.16 and has been vulnerable to sudden moves since listing on major exchanges. The token has a maximum supply of 10 billion, with roughly 3.4 billion in circulation, making future unlocks and treasury movements a continuing focus for investors.

Token unlock schedules have become a major risk factor across digital assets, especially for projects launched during periods of strong venture capital backing. Traders often discount tokens when large future supply releases are approaching, even when the underlying project remains active. For AI-linked crypto assets, the pressure is sharper because valuations have often been driven by the broader enthusiasm for artificial intelligence rather than by proven revenue from decentralised networks.

Sahara AI’s case also highlights a recurring weakness in crypto market structure. Blockchain transparency gives traders near-instant visibility into large transfers, but wallet labels, contract purposes and operational context are not always clear. A movement into a bridge contract can look similar to a preparatory sale until the project explains the destination and purpose. By then, leveraged positions may already have been liquidated and order books may have thinned.

Binance and other large exchanges gave SAHARA wide market access, but liquidity during stress can still prove fragile. A surge in volume does not automatically mean healthy trading conditions; it can also reflect rapid turnover among distressed sellers, arbitrage desks and short-term speculators. Tuesday’s price action showed how quickly sentiment can shift when on-chain activity collides with weak confidence.

Arabian Post – Crypto News Network

The article Sahara AI slide exposes token confidence gap appeared first on Arabian Post.

The dispute has turned a small transaction into a larger test of confidence in one of the market’s most influential bitcoin treasury companies. Strategy sold 32 bitcoin between May 26 and May 31 for about $2.5 million, at an average net price of $77,135 per coin. The proceeds were earmarked for payments on its Variable Rate Series A Perpetual Stretch Preferred Stock, known as STRC, marking the company’s first disclosed net disposal of bitcoin since late 2022.

Saylor, Strategy’s executive chairman, pushed back against suggestions that the sale reflected stress in the company’s bitcoin model. He argued that capital markets were funding artificial intelligence infrastructure at historic scale and described bitcoin’s slide as “a capital rotation, not a Bitcoin impairment”. Arca’s response was direct: the explanation ignored the market damage caused when the world’s largest corporate bitcoin holder sold even a tiny fraction of its reserve.

The amount sold represented only a sliver of Strategy’s holdings, yet its symbolism carried weight. Strategy has built its identity around long-term bitcoin accumulation, with Saylor closely associated with the “never sell” approach embraced by many cryptocurrency investors. Even a 32-coin sale challenged that narrative because it showed that bitcoin reserves could be used to service a growing capital structure, rather than being held as untouchable treasury assets.

Bitcoin had already been under pressure before the sale became the centre of debate. The token dropped more than 13 per cent over a week, briefly moving close to the $60,000 level after trading far higher earlier in the year. Spot bitcoin exchange-traded funds in the US recorded a run of withdrawals, with billions of dollars leaving the products over consecutive sessions. Risk appetite also weakened as investors assessed geopolitical tensions, equity market volatility, technology listings and the heavy funding needs of artificial intelligence companies.

Arca’s criticism rests on the view that Strategy’s own financing model has become a market issue. The company has issued layers of preferred stock and other securities to fund bitcoin purchases and support its balance sheet. Those instruments create recurring cash obligations. When bitcoin falls and Strategy’s stock weakens, the company has fewer attractive options: sell bitcoin, issue equity at dilutive prices, raise more preferred capital at high yields, or use cash reserves.

Strategy has sought to reassure investors that the sale did not signal a retreat from bitcoin accumulation. It bought 1,550 bitcoin for about $101.3 million between June 1 and June 7, at an average price of $65,332 per coin. That lifted its total holdings to 845,256 bitcoin. The company also increased its cash reserve to $1 billion, a move intended to support preferred dividend payments and reduce concern that it may need to sell more bitcoin during periods of market stress.

The rebound in buying helped restore some confidence, but it did not remove the central question. Strategy’s bitcoin strategy depends not only on the price of bitcoin but also on investor willingness to keep funding a capital structure built around the asset. When the premium in Strategy shares narrows, or when preferred securities trade below par, the company’s ability to raise capital efficiently can weaken.

Arca’s position does not require the 32-bitcoin sale to be large enough to move the market mechanically. Its argument is that the sale changed investor psychology. A company long viewed as a one-way buyer became a seller, however briefly. That shift mattered because Strategy’s behaviour has become a reference point for bitcoin-linked equities, exchange-traded products and leveraged treasury firms trying to copy its model.

Saylor’s artificial intelligence rotation argument also has a market logic. AI infrastructure has absorbed vast amounts of capital, from data centres and chips to power contracts and cloud capacity. Large technology companies have continued to attract investment even as parts of the crypto market have struggled. For investors seeking growth, AI has offered a clearer earnings story than bitcoin during a period of falling ETF flows and weaker momentum.

Arabian Post – Crypto News Network

The article Strategy sale rattles bitcoin blame game appeared first on Arabian Post.

The product allows eligible Coinbase One members in the United States to pledge USDC held in, or purchased through, their Coinbase wallet as security for a credit card issued by First Electronic Bank and offered through Cardless. The card runs on the American Express network and is designed to sit alongside the standard Coinbase One Card, which offers bitcoin rewards on purchases and is subject to normal credit approval.

The new secured structure marks a notable shift in the way digital assets are being used in mainstream credit products. Rather than treating stablecoins only as payment or trading instruments, the arrangement uses USDC as collateral supporting a revolving credit account. Applicants who do not meet unsecured credit requirements may be offered the option of designating USDC as secured funds for the Coinbase One Card with Security Deposit.

The pledged USDC cannot be withdrawn, transferred, lent, sold or traded while the secured card account remains open and any amounts owed are outstanding. Cardless is initially designated as the control party over the secured USDC, while First Electronic Bank remains the issuing bank. If a customer defaults or closes the account with unpaid balances, the secured USDC may be transferred, sold or liquidated to cover the amount owed.

The mechanism resembles a traditional secured credit card, where a cash deposit reduces issuer risk, but replaces the bank deposit with a dollar-pegged digital token. That distinction is important because USDC is not a bank deposit and is not covered by deposit insurance. Coinbase states in its user terms that USDC remains a supported digital asset and is not legal tender, while also noting that digital assets are not protected by FDIC or SIPC insurance.

For Coinbase, the card expands a consumer-finance strategy that has moved steadily beyond trading fees. The Coinbase One membership bundle already includes zero trading fees on limited monthly volumes, USDC rewards, staking boosts, account protection and access to the credit card at no added charge beyond the subscription. Annual membership for the basic tier starts at $49.99, and the card is available only to US customers, excluding US territories.

The rewards structure remains a key attraction. Cardholders can earn up to 4 per cent back in bitcoin on eligible purchases, with the rate tied to the value of assets held on Coinbase. Customers with less than $10,000 in assets start at 2 per cent, while higher tiers rise to 2.5 per cent, 3 per cent and 4 per cent. Rewards above the base tier are capped after $10,000 in eligible monthly spending, after which the rate falls back to 2 per cent.

Cardless gains a high-profile partner for its embedded credit platform, which provides programme management, application flows and credit-card infrastructure for consumer brands. The Coinbase relationship gives the company a foothold in a segment where crypto platforms, banks and card networks are testing new ways to connect digital wallets with familiar payment rails.

The timing reflects broader momentum behind stablecoins in payments and lending. The stablecoin market has grown into a sector worth hundreds of billions of dollars, led by dollar-pegged tokens such as Tether’s USDT and Circle’s USDC. Payment companies including Visa, Mastercard and Stripe have been building stablecoin settlement, card and merchant tools, while crypto exchanges are positioning stablecoins as a bridge between blockchain networks and traditional finance.

Regulatory scrutiny has also intensified. The United States has moved to place stablecoin issuers under clearer reserve, anti-money laundering and sanctions-compliance requirements, while digital-asset market rules remain under active legislative and supervisory debate. The direction of regulation is broadly supportive of payment stablecoins that maintain liquid reserves and transparent redemption arrangements, but consumer-protection questions remain central as stablecoins enter credit products.

The Coinbase-Cardless model still carries risks that differ from conventional secured cards. USDC is designed to trade at one US dollar, but stablecoins depend on reserves, market liquidity, redemption channels and operational reliability. Customers using secured USDC also face restrictions on access to their funds and may still owe money if liquidation proceeds do not fully cover a card balance, including after disputes, legal orders or adverse account events.

Arabian Post – Crypto News Network

The article Coinbase expands credit access with USDC card appeared first on Arabian Post.

The Consensys-owned wallet provider introduced the service on 8 June through a limited early-access programme, initially aimed at traders and developers testing autonomous finance tools. A wider rollout is planned over the coming months as crypto firms race to build infrastructure for software agents that can execute transactions, rebalance portfolios and interact with decentralised applications without constant manual input.

Agent Wallet gives AI systems access to swaps, perpetual futures, prediction markets and liquidity provisioning across Ethereum-compatible networks, with support extending to Hyperliquid. The product is being positioned as a guardrail-heavy alternative to the more hazardous practice of giving autonomous agents direct access to private keys or funding separate wallets that users must monitor manually.

Security is the centre of the launch. MetaMask says every agent-initiated transaction is routed through transaction simulation, scam and malicious-contract detection, threat scanning, clear-signing checks and MEV protection before execution. Transactions considered safe are eligible for protection of up to $10,000 under MetaMask’s Transaction Protection programme, while suspicious activity can trigger additional human approval.

The default setting, called Guard Mode, lets users define spending limits, approved protocols and operating conditions before an AI agent can act. Transactions outside those boundaries, or those flagged as dangerous, require two-factor authentication. A looser Beast Mode gives agents more room to act independently but still requires approval for transactions identified as malicious.

The launch reflects a broader shift in crypto markets, where AI agents are moving from experimental tools into active participants in trading, payments and decentralised finance. Developers are using them to scan markets, automate dollar-cost averaging, manage liquidity positions and execute multi-step strategies. That opens a new efficiency frontier but also adds a security problem: an AI model can be manipulated, misread instructions or follow a malicious prompt into a costly transaction.

MetaMask’s approach accepts that agent behaviour cannot be made fully predictable. Instead, the wallet places limits around what an agent may do, how much it can spend, where it may trade and when a human must intervene. That model builds on MetaMask’s Advanced Permissions framework, launched in April, which allows users to grant scoped, time-bound authority to applications without handing over broad wallet access or signing every transaction separately.

Advanced Permissions uses session accounts and delegation tools to execute actions within pre-set limits. A user can, for example, permit an application or agent to spend a fixed amount of a token over a defined period, while the main wallet remains under the user’s control. The system is intended to reduce approval fatigue without recreating the custody risks that decentralised wallets were designed to avoid.

Competition is building quickly. Coinbase introduced agent-focused wallet tools earlier this year, while MoonPay has expanded work on agent-linked payments and wallet standards. Hardware-wallet makers and infrastructure providers are also seeking a role as AI systems become more active in payments and trading. The emerging contest is not only over which platform can give agents access to crypto markets, but which one can prove that access is safe enough for real capital.

The timing is significant for MetaMask. The wallet has been expanding beyond its original role as an Ethereum browser extension into a broader financial interface covering swaps, staking, tokenised assets, prediction markets, cards and stablecoin-linked services. Agent Wallet adds another layer to that strategy by giving automated software a controlled pathway into the same ecosystem.

Regulatory and liability questions remain unresolved. Autonomous trading agents may create disputes over responsibility when a transaction goes wrong, especially if a user approved broad permissions but did not directly approve the exact trade. Crypto market regulators have already scrutinised wallet-linked swaps, staking and decentralised finance interfaces. AI-driven execution could sharpen those questions by blurring the line between user intent, software autonomy and platform responsibility.

The practical test will be whether MetaMask can make agent activity useful without making wallet security harder for ordinary users to understand. Crypto users have already struggled with phishing, blind signing, malicious contracts and approval scams. Adding AI agents introduces another layer of complexity, even if the interface is built around spending caps and warnings.

Arabian Post – Crypto News Network

The article MetaMask opens safer route for AI trades appeared first on Arabian Post.

The research firm’s attention carries unusual weight after its February essay on artificial intelligence and market risk helped trigger a sharp sell-off across technology and consumer-facing stocks. Its new focus on Hyperliquid has drawn fresh scrutiny to a protocol that has become one of the fastest-growing venues in decentralised derivatives trading, with its HYPE token ranking among the largest digital assets by market value.

Hyperliquid operates as a Layer 1 blockchain built around a high-speed order book for perpetual futures and spot trading. Unlike many crypto projects that rely mainly on future adoption narratives, liquidity incentives or governance promises, its appeal rests on a more conventional investment argument: users trade on the platform, the platform earns fees, and most of those fees are directed towards buying the native token in the open market.

That mechanism is central to Citrini’s view. The protocol’s Assistance Fund receives 99 per cent of eligible perpetual and spot trading fees, excluding certain builder and unit-related distributions, and uses the proceeds to acquire HYPE. This creates a direct link between trading activity and token demand, giving the asset a structure that resembles a recurring buyback programme rather than a purely speculative token cycle.

Protocol data show Hyperliquid generated gross protocol revenue of about $218.3 million in the first quarter of 2026, followed by about $150.4 million so far in the second quarter. Token-holder net income matched the buyback figure in those periods, at about $176.2 million in the first quarter and $117.8 million in the second quarter to date, reflecting the system’s fee-routing design.

HYPE’s market performance has reinforced the argument. The token traded near $63.70 on Tuesday, with a market capitalisation of about $16.16 billion and daily trading volume close to $969 million. It was up more than 10 per cent over 24 hours, placing it among the strongest large-cap crypto movers during the session.

Citrini’s framing is notable because it contrasts Hyperliquid with a broad swathe of crypto tokens that have struggled to define how protocol usage translates into value for holders. Many digital assets offer governance rights, staking rewards or ecosystem access, but few combine large transaction volumes with an automated buyback engine funded by operating activity.

The comparison has helped shift the debate around Hyperliquid from whether decentralised exchanges can attract users to whether their economics can support durable token value. Perpetual futures remain one of crypto’s most active trading segments, and Hyperliquid has built market share by offering fast execution, deep liquidity and a user experience closer to centralised exchanges than many older DeFi venues.

Still, the bullish case has limits. Hyperliquid’s revenues depend heavily on trading volume, which can fall sharply when volatility fades or user activity migrates elsewhere. Buybacks may support demand, but they do not remove the risks linked to token unlocks, concentrated ownership, regulatory pressure or technical failures. Derivatives trading also remains a sensitive area for regulators, particularly where retail users can access high leverage through offshore or decentralised platforms.

Competition is another concern. Centralised exchanges retain large liquidity advantages, while rival decentralised protocols are racing to improve speed, collateral flexibility and institutional access. Hyperliquid’s own success may invite copycat models that replicate parts of its fee-sharing and buyback structure.

The protocol’s supporters argue that its transparency is a differentiator. Fee flows, trading activity and buyback patterns can be tracked on-chain, making the economics easier to monitor than opaque corporate treasury actions or discretionary token support programmes. Critics counter that on-chain visibility does not guarantee resilience if market conditions change or if liquidity becomes concentrated among a narrow group of high-frequency traders.

Citrini’s endorsement has therefore placed Hyperliquid at the centre of a wider shift in crypto investing. The market is moving beyond broad narratives about decentralisation and adoption towards assets that can demonstrate revenue, capital return and product-market fit. That shift mirrors a more selective phase in digital assets, where investors are demanding clearer evidence that token value is tied to real economic activity rather than promotional cycles alone.

Arabian Post – Crypto News Network

The article Hyperliquid gains from cash-flow crypto thesis appeared first on Arabian Post.

The research firm’s attention carries unusual weight after its February essay on artificial intelligence and market risk helped trigger a sharp sell-off across technology and consumer-facing stocks. Its new focus on Hyperliquid has drawn fresh scrutiny to a protocol that has become one of the fastest-growing venues in decentralised derivatives trading, with its HYPE token ranking among the largest digital assets by market value.

Hyperliquid operates as a Layer 1 blockchain built around a high-speed order book for perpetual futures and spot trading. Unlike many crypto projects that rely mainly on future adoption narratives, liquidity incentives or governance promises, its appeal rests on a more conventional investment argument: users trade on the platform, the platform earns fees, and most of those fees are directed towards buying the native token in the open market.

That mechanism is central to Citrini’s view. The protocol’s Assistance Fund receives 99 per cent of eligible perpetual and spot trading fees, excluding certain builder and unit-related distributions, and uses the proceeds to acquire HYPE. This creates a direct link between trading activity and token demand, giving the asset a structure that resembles a recurring buyback programme rather than a purely speculative token cycle.

Protocol data show Hyperliquid generated gross protocol revenue of about $218.3 million in the first quarter of 2026, followed by about $150.4 million so far in the second quarter. Token-holder net income matched the buyback figure in those periods, at about $176.2 million in the first quarter and $117.8 million in the second quarter to date, reflecting the system’s fee-routing design.

HYPE’s market performance has reinforced the argument. The token traded near $63.70 on Tuesday, with a market capitalisation of about $16.16 billion and daily trading volume close to $969 million. It was up more than 10 per cent over 24 hours, placing it among the strongest large-cap crypto movers during the session.

Citrini’s framing is notable because it contrasts Hyperliquid with a broad swathe of crypto tokens that have struggled to define how protocol usage translates into value for holders. Many digital assets offer governance rights, staking rewards or ecosystem access, but few combine large transaction volumes with an automated buyback engine funded by operating activity.

The comparison has helped shift the debate around Hyperliquid from whether decentralised exchanges can attract users to whether their economics can support durable token value. Perpetual futures remain one of crypto’s most active trading segments, and Hyperliquid has built market share by offering fast execution, deep liquidity and a user experience closer to centralised exchanges than many older DeFi venues.

Still, the bullish case has limits. Hyperliquid’s revenues depend heavily on trading volume, which can fall sharply when volatility fades or user activity migrates elsewhere. Buybacks may support demand, but they do not remove the risks linked to token unlocks, concentrated ownership, regulatory pressure or technical failures. Derivatives trading also remains a sensitive area for regulators, particularly where retail users can access high leverage through offshore or decentralised platforms.

Competition is another concern. Centralised exchanges retain large liquidity advantages, while rival decentralised protocols are racing to improve speed, collateral flexibility and institutional access. Hyperliquid’s own success may invite copycat models that replicate parts of its fee-sharing and buyback structure.

The protocol’s supporters argue that its transparency is a differentiator. Fee flows, trading activity and buyback patterns can be tracked on-chain, making the economics easier to monitor than opaque corporate treasury actions or discretionary token support programmes. Critics counter that on-chain visibility does not guarantee resilience if market conditions change or if liquidity becomes concentrated among a narrow group of high-frequency traders.

Citrini’s endorsement has therefore placed Hyperliquid at the centre of a wider shift in crypto investing. The market is moving beyond broad narratives about decentralisation and adoption towards assets that can demonstrate revenue, capital return and product-market fit. That shift mirrors a more selective phase in digital assets, where investors are demanding clearer evidence that token value is tied to real economic activity rather than promotional cycles alone.

Arabian Post – Crypto News Network

The article Hyperliquid gains from cash-flow crypto thesis appeared first on Arabian Post.

The project said 100% of its LP tokens had been permanently burned, securing more than $170,000 in on-chain liquidity. LP tokens typically represent control over liquidity deposited into a decentralised exchange pool. Burning them removes the project’s ability to withdraw that liquidity, a step often used by token projects to reassure communities that a trading pool cannot be drained by insiders.

The move is being presented as a trust-building measure at a time when smaller Web3 projects face greater scrutiny over liquidity controls, smart-contract ownership and governance claims. Cryptocurrency markets have seen repeated cases in which weak permissions, opaque treasury structures or developer-controlled liquidity created losses for retail participants. GenZVerse’s decision to remove LP-token control therefore addresses one of the most closely watched risk points in early-stage token ecosystems.

Alongside the liquidity action, ownership of the GNZ token contract, reserve contract, staking contract and business ecosystem contract has been transferred to a multisignature wallet. Under such a structure, critical transactions require approval from more than one authorised signer, reducing reliance on a single private key or central operator. For Web3 projects, multisig controls are commonly used for treasury management, protocol upgrades and emergency actions.

GenZVerse said the governance shift forms part of a wider plan to build a community-driven ecosystem rather than a token-only project. Its reported metrics include more than 1,000 community members, over 100,000 GNZ tokens removed from circulation through burn mechanisms, and a token price increase from about $0.03 at launch to about $0.24. These figures remain project-reported indicators and should be read alongside the wider volatility and liquidity risks that apply to small crypto assets.

The project is built on Polygon, an Ethereum scaling network widely used for lower-cost blockchain transactions, decentralised applications and token transfers. Polygon’s relatively low transaction fees have made it attractive for projects seeking frequent user interaction, including gaming, social finance, staking dashboards and decentralised trading interfaces.

GenZVerse’s next phase centres on a Web3 super app, with initial features expected to include a multi-chain decentralised wallet, integrated decentralised exchange swap tools, a dApp browser, a GNZ ecosystem dashboard, a transparency centre and a community hub. The transparency centre is intended to show token supply, token-burn data, liquidity status, governance updates, contract details and other blockchain metrics.

The planned product direction reflects a wider trend in Web3, where projects are moving away from single-purpose token launches toward bundled ecosystems that combine wallets, dashboards, rewards, governance and community engagement. That model can strengthen user retention if real utility develops, but it also raises execution demands because projects must deliver usable software, secure infrastructure and sustainable incentives.

The LP burn may strengthen market confidence among existing token holders, but it does not remove all project risks. A burned liquidity position can reduce the risk of withdrawal by the token deployer, yet it does not guarantee deep liquidity, price stability, audited code or long-term adoption. Multisig governance also improves operational security only when signer selection, approval thresholds and transaction transparency are robust.

GenZVerse has framed the changes as part of a “community-first” architecture. Earlier project material described its ambition as a community-owned, open-source decentralised autonomous organisation, with token holders participating in governance and ecosystem decisions. The latest contract transfer gives that claim more operational weight, though the practical strength of decentralised governance will depend on voting design, user participation and how future upgrades are proposed and approved.

Arabian Post – Crypto News Network

The article GenZVerse tightens controls after LP burn appeared first on Arabian Post.

The project said 100% of its LP tokens had been permanently burned, securing more than $170,000 in on-chain liquidity. LP tokens typically represent control over liquidity deposited into a decentralised exchange pool. Burning them removes the project’s ability to withdraw that liquidity, a step often used by token projects to reassure communities that a trading pool cannot be drained by insiders.

The move is being presented as a trust-building measure at a time when smaller Web3 projects face greater scrutiny over liquidity controls, smart-contract ownership and governance claims. Cryptocurrency markets have seen repeated cases in which weak permissions, opaque treasury structures or developer-controlled liquidity created losses for retail participants. GenZVerse’s decision to remove LP-token control therefore addresses one of the most closely watched risk points in early-stage token ecosystems.

Alongside the liquidity action, ownership of the GNZ token contract, reserve contract, staking contract and business ecosystem contract has been transferred to a multisignature wallet. Under such a structure, critical transactions require approval from more than one authorised signer, reducing reliance on a single private key or central operator. For Web3 projects, multisig controls are commonly used for treasury management, protocol upgrades and emergency actions.

GenZVerse said the governance shift forms part of a wider plan to build a community-driven ecosystem rather than a token-only project. Its reported metrics include more than 1,000 community members, over 100,000 GNZ tokens removed from circulation through burn mechanisms, and a token price increase from about $0.03 at launch to about $0.24. These figures remain project-reported indicators and should be read alongside the wider volatility and liquidity risks that apply to small crypto assets.

The project is built on Polygon, an Ethereum scaling network widely used for lower-cost blockchain transactions, decentralised applications and token transfers. Polygon’s relatively low transaction fees have made it attractive for projects seeking frequent user interaction, including gaming, social finance, staking dashboards and decentralised trading interfaces.

GenZVerse’s next phase centres on a Web3 super app, with initial features expected to include a multi-chain decentralised wallet, integrated decentralised exchange swap tools, a dApp browser, a GNZ ecosystem dashboard, a transparency centre and a community hub. The transparency centre is intended to show token supply, token-burn data, liquidity status, governance updates, contract details and other blockchain metrics.

The planned product direction reflects a wider trend in Web3, where projects are moving away from single-purpose token launches toward bundled ecosystems that combine wallets, dashboards, rewards, governance and community engagement. That model can strengthen user retention if real utility develops, but it also raises execution demands because projects must deliver usable software, secure infrastructure and sustainable incentives.

The LP burn may strengthen market confidence among existing token holders, but it does not remove all project risks. A burned liquidity position can reduce the risk of withdrawal by the token deployer, yet it does not guarantee deep liquidity, price stability, audited code or long-term adoption. Multisig governance also improves operational security only when signer selection, approval thresholds and transaction transparency are robust.

GenZVerse has framed the changes as part of a “community-first” architecture. Earlier project material described its ambition as a community-owned, open-source decentralised autonomous organisation, with token holders participating in governance and ecosystem decisions. The latest contract transfer gives that claim more operational weight, though the practical strength of decentralised governance will depend on voting design, user participation and how future upgrades are proposed and approved.

Arabian Post – Crypto News Network

The article GenZVerse tightens controls after LP burn appeared first on Arabian Post.

The world’s largest cryptocurrency touched its weakest level since October 2024 after failing to hold support around $65,000, a level traders had treated as critical following last month’s attempted recovery. The latest slide left Bitcoin down by more than 30 per cent for the year and more than 50 per cent below the record highs above $120,000 reached in late 2025.

The fall has challenged the argument that Bitcoin can act as a durable alternative store of value during periods of market stress. Instead, price action this year has shown a market increasingly exposed to the same liquidity conditions and risk appetite that shape equities, credit and high-growth technology assets. The retreat has also come as investors chase stronger near-term momentum in artificial intelligence, semiconductor, memory and cloud infrastructure stocks.

Global equity funds drew more than $21bn in the week to June 3, while technology funds attracted about $9bn, their strongest intake in several weeks. Optimism around AI spending, data centre demand and enterprise computing has kept capital flowing into companies viewed as direct beneficiaries of the investment cycle. Shares linked to servers, chips, power systems and memory have outperformed digital assets, leaving Bitcoin struggling to compete for speculative flows.

The pressure has been most visible in exchange-traded funds. Spot Bitcoin products, which were a major source of demand after their 2024 launch, have seen heavy withdrawals as institutional investors reduce exposure. One leading Bitcoin fund lost more than $3bn between May 18 and June 3, while other large products also recorded outflows. That reversal has undermined one of the strongest pillars of the previous rally, when regulated access helped widen participation among asset managers and advisers.

A further blow came from the first reported Bitcoin sale in years by Strategy, the corporate holder long associated with aggressive accumulation. The move was treated by traders as a symbolic break in a market narrative built around permanent balance-sheet demand. Strategy’s shares fell alongside crypto-linked equities, with Coinbase and several miners also hit by the wider liquidation.

Gold has remained part of the allocation debate, although flows have been uneven. Demand for bullion surged through earlier phases of geopolitical and inflation anxiety, with investors using the metal as a hedge against currency weakness and policy uncertainty. Precious metals funds then saw outflows in the latest weekly data, showing that capital rotation has not moved in a single direction. Even so, gold’s stronger performance over the past year has left Bitcoin facing tougher comparisons as a hedge.

The macro backdrop has added to the strain. Sticky inflation, firmer bond yields and a cautious Federal Reserve have reduced expectations for quick monetary easing. Bitcoin tends to perform best when liquidity is expanding and real yields are falling. This year’s rate environment has made leveraged bets more expensive and reduced appetite for assets that do not produce cash flow.

Market structure has also shifted. Stablecoins now account for a larger share of digital-asset activity, with their role in payments, trading settlement and decentralised finance expanding faster than Bitcoin’s transactional use. Rival tokens linked to payments infrastructure, tokenisation and blockchain settlement have also drawn attention from investors seeking more direct links to financial applications.

Bitcoin supporters argue that the drawdown reflects cyclical positioning rather than a structural failure. Supply remains capped at 21mn coins, exchange balances are still below earlier cycle peaks, and long-term holders have historically used deep corrections to accumulate. They also point to previous crashes that were followed by new highs once liquidity conditions improved.

Arabian Post – Crypto News Network

The article Bitcoin sell-off deepens as AI trade dominates appeared first on Arabian Post.

The payments group has outlined plans to expand settlement options for issuers and acquirers, including intraday, weekend and holiday processing in fiat currencies and on-chain card settlement using regulated stablecoins. The move is designed to give banks, financial technology companies and payment processors more flexibility in managing liquidity, particularly across cross-border payments, treasury operations and payout flows where timing can affect cost and cash availability.

Ripple’s RLUSD stablecoin is among the digital assets included in the programme, with the XRP Ledger listed among the supported blockchain networks. Other stablecoins named in the broader settlement framework include Circle’s USDC, Paxos-issued PYUSD, USDG and USDP, and SoFiUSD. The networks identified for settlement support include Arbitrum, Base, Canton, Ethereum, Polygon, Solana, Tempo and XRPL.

The announcement builds on an earlier collaboration involving Mastercard, Ripple, WebBank and Gemini to explore the use of RLUSD on XRPL for settling fiat-based card transactions linked to the Gemini Credit Card. That initiative was positioned as one of the first efforts in which a regulated US bank would test settlement of traditional card transactions using a regulated stablecoin on a public blockchain, subject to approvals and integration work.

Mastercard’s latest move signals that stablecoins are being treated less as speculative crypto instruments and more as infrastructure for institutional money movement. The company is not replacing its existing settlement rails; rather, it is adding digital asset-based options alongside conventional processes. That distinction is important for banks and acquirers, which remain bound by capital, compliance and operational requirements even as they seek faster settlement cycles.

Raj Dhamodharan, executive vice-president for blockchain and digital assets at Mastercard, said the next phase of stablecoin adoption is focused on “real-world utility”, particularly in settlement where liquidity and timing matter. His comments underline Mastercard’s strategy of integrating digital assets into established networks without giving up the safeguards that underpin card payments, including fraud controls, dispute processes and security standards.

For Ripple, inclusion of RLUSD and XRPL strengthens its pitch to financial institutions that public blockchain networks can support regulated financial activity. RLUSD, a US dollar-backed stablecoin issued under a New York trust company framework, has been promoted as an institutional-grade settlement asset. Ripple has argued that public blockchains can improve payment speed and transparency while retaining compliance features demanded by banks and payment companies.

The involvement of WebBank and Gemini gives the XRP Ledger use case a direct link to card payments rather than a purely crypto-native transaction flow. WebBank issues the Gemini Credit Card, while Gemini provides the digital asset platform behind the programme. The collaboration allows Mastercard and its partners to test whether stablecoin settlement can reduce friction in a live card environment without changing the consumer-facing payment experience.

Several early participants are expected to support stablecoin settlement optionality in the United States and Latin America, including ARQ, CBW Bank, Cross River, Lead Bank and Nuvei. Their participation points to growing demand among banks and payment platforms for settlement systems that can operate outside traditional cut-off times, particularly in markets where cross-border transfers and liquidity management remain costly.

The broader context is a sharp acceleration in institutional stablecoin activity. Payment firms, banks and blockchain companies are competing to define how tokenised dollars move through regulated financial systems. Visa, PayPal, Circle, Paxos and several bank-backed platforms are also advancing stablecoin settlement and tokenised money initiatives, creating a race to link blockchain rails with existing payment networks.

Regulatory scrutiny remains a central factor. Stablecoins used in payment settlement must satisfy requirements around reserves, redemption, sanctions screening, anti-money-laundering controls and consumer protection. Mastercard has emphasised that its settlement expansion will roll out subject to regulation, with additional regions, partners and stablecoins added over time.

The development also raises competitive questions for blockchain networks. XRPL gains visibility from RLUSD’s inclusion, but Mastercard’s multi-network approach shows that no single blockchain is being treated as the sole rail for institutional settlement. Instead, payment companies appear to be building interoperable frameworks that allow regulated assets to move across several networks depending on market, partner and compliance needs.

For card issuers and acquirers, the immediate benefit is likely to be operational rather than consumer-facing. Faster settlement can improve liquidity, reduce idle balances and support more flexible treasury planning. For merchants and end users, any impact may emerge later through lower payment friction, quicker payouts or new cross-border services.

Arabian Post – Crypto News Network

The article Mastercard widens blockchain settlement push appeared first on Arabian Post.

The liquidation burst reflected a rapid unwinding of bullish bets after prices broke through key support levels, leaving heavily leveraged traders unable to meet margin requirements. Long positions are liquidated when exchanges automatically close bets placed on rising prices after collateral falls below required thresholds. The speed of the move suggested thin liquidity, concentrated leverage and aggressive stop-loss activity across major trading venues.

Bitcoin led the decline, falling towards the low-$60,000 range after a week of sustained pressure, while Ether, Solana, XRP and other large-cap tokens also came under selling pressure. The move followed a broader risk-off tone across digital assets, with traders cutting exposure after several sessions of weaker spot demand, shrinking speculative appetite and pressure in exchange-traded crypto products.

The derivatives market bore the brunt of the stress. Perpetual futures, which allow traders to hold leveraged positions without expiry, have become one of the main transmission channels for crypto volatility. When prices fall sharply, forced liquidations can create a feedback loop: exchanges close long positions, market orders add to selling pressure, prices fall further, and more leveraged accounts are wiped out.

Bitcoin’s failure to defend support near widely watched technical levels added to the pressure. Traders had been monitoring the $65,000 and $62,000 zones after a strong rally earlier in the year gave way to profit-taking. Once those levels cracked, downside momentum accelerated, with short-term holders and highly leveraged accounts becoming more vulnerable.

The liquidation wave also came as open interest across crypto futures remained elevated compared with spot market depth. High open interest is not inherently negative, but it can amplify market moves when positioning becomes crowded on one side. In this case, bullish exposure appeared vulnerable to a sudden price break, particularly among traders using high leverage to chase rebounds.

Ether’s weakness added another layer of concern. The second-largest token by market value has faced pressure from slower momentum in decentralised finance activity and cautious positioning around staking-linked products. A drop in Ether often spills into smaller tokens, where liquidity is thinner and price moves can be more severe. Several altcoins suffered sharper percentage declines than Bitcoin as traders reduced exposure to higher-risk assets.

The latest bout of volatility underscores how crypto markets remain heavily influenced by derivatives activity despite wider institutional participation through spot exchange-traded products and regulated custody channels. The arrival of large investors has improved market infrastructure, but it has not removed the sector’s tendency towards abrupt leverage-driven moves.

Market sentiment has also been affected by signs of capital rotation into other high-growth assets, including artificial intelligence-linked equities and large technology listings. Crypto assets, which had benefited from liquidity-driven enthusiasm, have faced stiffer competition for speculative capital. That shift has placed additional strain on tokens that depend heavily on momentum-driven inflows.

Exchange data showed that long liquidations accounted for the overwhelming share of forced closures, confirming that traders betting on a rebound were caught off guard. Short positions also faced smaller liquidations during brief price rebounds, but the dominant feature of the session was the collapse of leveraged bullish exposure.

The impact was not limited to individual traders. Market makers and liquidity providers tend to widen spreads during abrupt sell-offs, raising trading costs and making rebounds harder to sustain. When order books thin out, even moderate selling can produce outsized price moves. That dynamic has been visible across crypto markets during previous liquidation cascades, including the sell-offs that followed major exchange failures and macro-driven tightening cycles.

Regulatory scrutiny remains an important backdrop. Authorities in several jurisdictions have warned that high leverage, opaque offshore venues and fragmented supervision continue to pose risks to retail traders. While major exchanges have reduced leverage limits compared with earlier market cycles, access to aggressive margin products remains widespread.

Arabian Post – Crypto News Network

The article Crypto sell-off wipes out leveraged longs appeared first on Arabian Post.

The change took effect on June 4, UTC+8, and applies to the exchange’s Unified Trading Account and Multi-Asset Mode for USDT-M Futures. It allows users to deploy selected tokenised equities and ETFs as collateral while maintaining futures positions, potentially reducing the need to convert those holdings into USDT before entering derivatives trades.

The supported assets include rAAPL, rAMZN, rMETA, rMU, rTSLA, rGOOGL, rNVDA, rINTC, rMSFT, rASML, rAVGO, rTSM, rQQQ, rSPY and rSNDK. The list gives traders exposure to tokenised representations linked to large technology companies, semiconductor groups and two widely followed US equity ETFs, reflecting the strong overlap between crypto traders and high-liquidity US market names.

“As tokenised assets continue to gain traction across global markets, users are looking for more ways to utilise their holdings across different trading activities,” Bitget chief executive Gracy Chen said. “Adding tokenised stocks and ETFs as margin assets increases flexibility within the Unified Trading Account and supports a more seamless experience across crypto and traditional market products.”

Bitget’s move is part of a wider push by crypto exchanges to position tokenised real-world assets as functional trading instruments rather than passive portfolio holdings. Tokenised equities typically seek to mirror the economic performance of listed shares or ETFs through digital tokens, although structures vary by issuer, custody model, jurisdiction and user eligibility. In several cases, they provide price exposure but not conventional shareholder rights such as voting, direct dividend entitlement or participation in corporate governance.

The exchange has been expanding its stock-linked products through Bitget Stocks 2.0, a tokenised stock spot product designed to improve liquidity, transparency and capital efficiency. That programme is built around tokenised access to US-listed securities, with trading settled through crypto-native rails and supported by Bitget’s broader trading infrastructure. The latest collateral update connects that equity-linked exposure more directly with futures strategies, allowing users to manage stock tokens, crypto assets and derivatives positions within one account structure.

For active traders, the key attraction is capital efficiency. A holder of a tokenised Nvidia, Tesla or Apple-linked asset, for example, may be able to keep that position while using it to support futures trades elsewhere on the platform. That can increase flexibility during volatile market conditions, particularly for users seeking to hedge, rotate exposure or maintain multiple strategies without repeatedly selling and repurchasing assets.

The feature also raises risk-management questions. Futures trading carries liquidation risk, and using tokenised equities as collateral adds another layer of market exposure because the collateral value itself can move sharply. Semiconductor and technology stocks have shown large price swings during earnings cycles, interest-rate repricing and AI-related market moves. If the value of collateral falls while a futures position moves against the trader, margin stress can accelerate.

Collateral ratios, eligibility rules and platform-level risk controls will therefore be central to how the product is used. Tokenised assets may not be treated at full face value for margin purposes, and exchanges typically apply haircuts to reflect liquidity, volatility and operational risk. Traders also face counterparty, custody and issuer-structure considerations that differ from holding shares through a traditional securities account.

Regulatory scrutiny of tokenised securities has intensified as exchanges, brokerages and asset managers explore blockchain-based access to stocks, bonds, funds and commodities. Market authorities have been clear that tokenisation does not remove securities-law obligations where the underlying instrument or economic exposure falls within regulated activity. The treatment of tokenised stocks can depend on whether the token represents direct ownership, a custodial claim, a derivative arrangement or a synthetic exposure.

Arabian Post – Crypto News Network

The article Bitget widens tokenised equity collateral use appeared first on Arabian Post.

The chip, presented at the company’s Build conference in San Francisco, marks the next stage of Microsoft’s long-running push to develop a fault-tolerant quantum computer based on topological qubits. Microsoft says the new processor delivers a sharp improvement over Majorana 1, with qubits that are far more stable and an average lifetime of about 20 seconds, compared with millisecond-scale performance in the earlier generation.

That claim matters beyond the research laboratory because powerful quantum computers could undermine the public-key cryptography used to secure blockchain ownership. Bitcoin’s proof-of-work mining relies on SHA-256 hashing, which is not viewed as the immediate weak point. The greater concern lies with elliptic-curve digital signatures, including ECDSA and Schnorr schemes built around secp256k1, which protect wallet spending authority.

A sufficiently advanced quantum computer running Shor’s algorithm could, in theory, derive a private key from an exposed public key. Once that happens, an attacker could sign a fraudulent transaction and move funds before the legitimate owner can respond. The threat is not practical today, but the timeline has become more contested as major technology groups report progress in hardware stability, error correction and quantum-resource efficiency.

Microsoft has framed Majorana 2 as a step towards commercially useful quantum systems by 2029, putting its roadmap in the same broad window as other industry targets. The company says artificial intelligence tools helped accelerate the chip’s design by improving materials research, parameter setting, testing and diagnostics. A shift in materials, including the use of lead-based superconducting components, is being presented as central to the claimed performance gains.

The announcement has drawn attention across the crypto market because Bitcoin’s security model depends on long-term confidence in cryptographic assumptions. Around 19.7 million bitcoins have already been mined, and a meaningful share sits in addresses where public keys are visible on-chain because coins have been spent from those addresses before. Older pay-to-public-key formats and reused addresses are seen as more exposed than modern address practices that reveal the public key only at the moment of spending.

Quantum-risk specialists have estimated that millions of bitcoins could be at static risk once a cryptographically relevant quantum computer exists. The more difficult scenario involves a live attack during the short window between the broadcast and confirmation of a transaction. Bitcoin’s average block interval of about 10 minutes has therefore become part of the debate, since a quantum attacker would need to derive the private key and submit a competing transaction within that period.

Google-linked research this year added pressure to the discussion by suggesting that fewer quantum resources may be needed to attack 256-bit elliptic-curve systems than older estimates assumed. That has not changed the present-day reality that no publicly known quantum computer can break Bitcoin keys at scale. It has, however, strengthened the case for early migration planning because decentralised networks often take years to agree, test and deploy protocol-level changes.

The scientific response to Microsoft’s topological-qubit programme remains mixed. Supporters view topological qubits as a promising route to lower error rates and more scalable machines. Sceptics argue that claims around Majorana-based devices require more public, reproducible evidence before they can be treated as a confirmed breakthrough. The history of Majorana research includes disputed findings and intense scrutiny over whether observed signals represent true topological states or more ordinary physical effects.

For Bitcoin developers and infrastructure providers, the issue is less whether Majorana 2 alone threatens wallets and more whether it signals faster progress across the quantum industry. Exchanges, custodians and wallet makers face a practical challenge: any transition to post-quantum signatures would have to protect existing holdings, avoid breaking compatibility and maintain confidence during a potentially disruptive migration.

Arabian Post – Crypto News Network

The article Microsoft quantum leap sharpens Bitcoin risk appeared first on Arabian Post.

The award was presented at a live ceremony at the Louvre Palace in Paris during Proof of Talk 2026, a two-day Web3 and digital finance gathering held on June 2 and 3. The event brought together senior figures from traditional finance, blockchain infrastructure, asset management and payments, with organisers positioning it as an institutional forum rather than a retail crypto showcase.

ChangeNOW’s recognition followed a selection process built around institutional impact, product strength, adoption, market leadership and regulatory relevance. The awards programme said candidates were reviewed through a staged evaluation that included independent blind scoring, a format intended to reduce brand bias and reward operational substance over promotional reach.

The result places ChangeNOW among digital asset firms seeking to move beyond simple crypto trading into business-grade infrastructure. The platform began in 2017 as an instant cryptocurrency exchange and has since expanded into a broader crypto management ecosystem, offering non-custodial swaps, API connectivity, exchange tools and B2B services for companies operating in the digital asset market.

Its core proposition is based on a non-custodial model, under which users do not leave balances on the platform and the service does not take long-term control of client funds. That structure has become more important as institutional users assess counterparty risk, cyber exposure and custody standards after years of exchange failures, market manipulation cases and regulatory enforcement actions across the sector.

ChangeNOW says it supports hundreds of crypto assets and thousands of trading pairs, with services ranging from account-free exchange flows to payment and integration tools for businesses. Its API offering is aimed at wallets, fintech platforms, exchanges and digital asset companies that want to embed crypto conversion functions without building full trading infrastructure internally.

The Paris award also reflects a wider shift in the language of crypto finance. Awards and conferences once dominated by decentralised finance protocols and token issuers are now placing heavier emphasis on custody, compliance, liquidity access, stablecoins, tokenisation and settlement systems. Institutional buyers are demanding more predictable controls, clearer accountability and compatibility with existing financial rules.

Proof of Talk 2026 was marketed as a high-level executive summit, with attendance capped at about 2,500 participants and a speaker roster including leaders from blockchain companies, payment networks, asset managers and financial infrastructure groups. Its agenda focused on regulation, institutional adoption, tokenised real-world assets, stablecoins and the convergence of decentralised networks with mainstream finance.

The award comes as digital assets are being pulled closer to the regulated financial perimeter. The European Union’s Markets in Crypto-Assets framework is setting uniform rules for crypto-asset service providers, token issuers and stablecoin operators, while regulators in the United Kingdom and the United States are weighing how to supervise stablecoins, custody and tokenised deposit systems.

Stablecoins and tokenised deposits have become central to the debate. Central bankers have warned that dollar-linked stablecoins could deepen the dollar’s global role, while commercial banks are exploring tokenised bank deposits as a regulated alternative for settlement, treasury management and cross-border payments. That competitive backdrop is increasing demand for crypto platforms that can connect users, wallets and businesses without assuming the balance-sheet role of a traditional exchange.

For ChangeNOW, the award offers reputational value in a crowded field where trust is difficult to establish and switching costs for users remain low. Non-custodial exchanges compete not only on pricing and asset coverage but also on speed, reliability, security monitoring, sanctions controls, customer support and the resilience of third-party liquidity links.

The recognition is likely to support ChangeNOW’s B2B positioning as more fintechs, wallets and payment providers seek modular digital asset infrastructure. But the same market opening also brings pressure. Firms serving business clients face growing expectations around transaction screening, compliance documentation, service uptime, consumer protection and transparency over routing, fees and execution quality.

Crypto infrastructure providers are entering a tougher phase in which awards, partnerships and conference visibility must be backed by durable governance and operational evidence. ChangeNOW’s Paris win signals that non-custodial exchange technology is gaining a stronger place in institutional conversations, even as regulators and banks continue to shape the rules that will determine how far such platforms can move into mainstream financial services.

Arabian Post – Crypto News Network

The article ChangeNOW wins Paris digital assets award appeared first on Arabian Post.

The Stockholm-linked platform is allowing participants to create markets tied to World Cup outcomes, make them available for trading and receive a share of fees generated by activity in those markets. The model shifts part of the market-building role away from platform operators and towards users, giving traders scope to list questions around match results, group-stage progress, tournament awards, player performance and broader football narratives.

The feature arrives days before the World Cup begins on June 11 at the Mexico City Stadium, with Mexico facing South Africa in the opening match. The tournament, co-hosted by Canada, Mexico and the United States, is the largest in FIFA history, expanding to 48 teams and 104 matches across 16 host cities before the final on July 19 in New York New Jersey.

Premu’s offer combines permissionless market creation with leveraged event trading of up to 2.5 times, a structure that could amplify both returns and losses as football sentiment changes across a compressed 39-day tournament window. Its fee-sharing model is designed to reward users who identify outcomes likely to attract trading interest, placing emphasis on speed, relevance and community demand.

Prediction markets have gained wider attention as users increasingly treat event contracts as a live measure of probability rather than a conventional betting product. Prices on these platforms typically move as traders buy and sell outcome-linked positions, creating implied odds that can shift quickly after injuries, team announcements, disciplinary decisions, tactical changes or results elsewhere in the tournament.

The World Cup is an unusually strong setting for such markets because it brings global attention, high-frequency fixtures and constant changes in expectations. Beyond outright winner markets, traders are likely to focus on group winners, knockout qualification, top scorer outcomes, clean sheets, goal totals, continental performance and star-player milestones. The expanded format also creates more uncertainty, particularly around third-placed teams advancing from the group stage.

Premu enters a competitive field shaped by platforms such as Polymarket and Kalshi, both of which have helped push prediction markets into wider public discussion. Sports-linked markets have become a key growth area, with football offering one of the most liquid global audiences. The 2026 World Cup gives newer platforms a chance to build user activity around a single, highly visible event rather than relying only on political, macroeconomic or crypto-focused contracts.

The platform’s user-created model may give it an advantage in market variety, but it also brings operational challenges. Event markets depend on clear wording, reliable settlement rules and transparent resolution criteria. Ambiguous questions can create disputes, especially where injuries, abandoned matches, disciplinary appeals or data-provider discrepancies affect outcomes. The quality of market design will therefore be central to whether Premu can attract sustained trading beyond the initial tournament surge.

Leveraged prediction markets add another layer of risk. While leverage can increase market depth and draw experienced traders, it can also expose retail users to rapid liquidation when prices move sharply. Football markets can swing within minutes after a red card, penalty decision, team-sheet surprise or late goal. For a decentralised platform, the challenge is to balance open access with enough risk controls to prevent disorderly trading during volatile match windows.

Regulatory scrutiny is also intensifying across event-trading platforms, particularly where products resemble sports betting or financial derivatives. Jurisdictions differ sharply in how they treat prediction markets, with some focusing on gambling rules and others examining derivatives, consumer protection and market integrity. Platforms that operate across borders face added complexity when users trade on outcomes involving sport, politics, crypto assets or public events.

Arabian Post – Crypto News Network

The article Premu pushes World Cup trading shift appeared first on Arabian Post.

The Luxembourg-domiciled fund has been developed with LRC Group and Ownera, combining established alternative investment fund structures with on-chain issuance of fund units. The shares are being tokenised on GS DAP, Goldman Sachs’ distributed ledger platform, while LRC Group acts as manager, Archax serves as custodian for the regulated digital securities and first distribution partner, and Ownera provides interoperability infrastructure to connect market participants and distribution channels.

Apex Group is providing alternative investment fund manager services through Fundrock LIS, alongside fund administration, depositary services for assets other than financial instruments and bank account services through its subsidiaries. The arrangement places conventional fund governance, investor servicing, regulatory reporting and lifecycle administration alongside blockchain-based issuance, a design aimed at reassuring institutional investors that the structure does not rely on unregulated crypto-market practices.

The launch comes as major banks, asset managers and market infrastructure firms move from experimental digital-asset pilots towards products tied to real-world assets. Tokenisation has gained traction in money market funds, bonds, private credit and commodities, but real estate remains harder to scale because of valuation complexity, jurisdictional rules, slower transaction cycles and limited secondary-market liquidity.

Mathew McDermott, global head of digital assets at Goldman Sachs, said issuing blockchain-native fund units on GS DAP enables investment in real estate assets with greater precision while creating scope for smoother transferability over time. His comments reflect the broader strategic priority among large financial institutions: using distributed ledger technology to improve post-trade processes, ownership records and operational workflows rather than treating blockchain purely as a speculative trading venue.

Apex Group’s global head of digital assets, Agnes Mazurek, said institutional-scale tokenisation depends on trusted and regulated infrastructure. She framed real estate as a natural starting point for blockchain-native solutions operating within existing regulatory frameworks, emphasising that on-chain issuance can be integrated into established fund models without weakening governance or investor protection.

The structure is designed to address two persistent weaknesses in tokenised funds: scalable distribution and ongoing servicing. A digital token can record ownership and potentially support faster transfers, but investors still require onboarding, compliance checks, asset valuation, corporate actions, reporting and custody arrangements. By involving regulated and specialist providers across those functions, the partners are seeking to demonstrate that tokenisation can work inside mainstream finance rather than parallel to it.

Real estate tokenisation converts ownership interests or fund units linked to property assets into digital tokens recorded on a blockchain or distributed ledger. Supporters argue the model can reduce manual processing, improve auditability, lower settlement friction and potentially broaden access to property-backed investment strategies. It may also allow fund interests to be transferred more efficiently once legal, compliance and distribution conditions are met.

The asset class presents particular challenges. Property assets are inherently local, often highly regulated and dependent on appraisals, leases, debt arrangements and jurisdiction-specific transfer rules. Token holders do not automatically gain liquidity merely because units exist on a ledger. Secondary-market activity requires buyers, sellers, authorised venues, clear transfer restrictions and confidence in valuation.

Industry projections have nevertheless encouraged investment in the sector. Tokenised real estate remains a small part of global property markets, but forecasts suggest the value of property-linked assets represented on digital rails could rise sharply over the next decade if regulatory clarity, custody standards and institutional distribution improve. Broader tokenised fund assets are also expected to expand as money market, fixed income and private-market products adopt blockchain-based recordkeeping.

Goldman Sachs has been positioning GS DAP as part of that shift. The platform has been used to explore digital representations of financial instruments and ownership records, with the bank seeking to build infrastructure that can support institutional workflows across asset classes. Its involvement in the real estate fund adds a property-market use case to the growing list of tokenised products being tested by major financial institutions.

Archax, a regulated digital asset platform, brings custody and distribution capabilities for digital securities, while Ownera’s infrastructure is intended to improve connectivity between participants and channels. LRC Group’s role as manager anchors the structure in real estate investment expertise, an important distinction in a market where technology alone cannot solve asset selection, valuation, leasing risk or property-cycle exposure.

The launch does not remove the risks associated with real estate funds. Investors remain exposed to property-market conditions, interest-rate movements, tenant demand, leverage, valuation adjustments and liquidity constraints. Tokenisation may improve administration and transfer mechanics, but it does not turn illiquid underlying assets into cash-like instruments.

Arabian Post – Crypto News Network

The article Goldman deepens push into property tokens appeared first on Arabian Post.

The new system offers three lock-up options. Users can stake $WHALE for 90 days with a 1.2x multiplier and 107.8% annual percentage yield, 180 days with a 1.5x multiplier and 129% APY, or 365 days with a 3x multiplier and 200% APY. The multiplier is fixed when a staking position is created, giving participants clear reward terms for the chosen lock period.

Whale Printer is being funded through a dedicated reward pool of 20 billion $WHALE, equal to 20% of the token’s total supply. The pool is not designed to replenish. Once it is exhausted, the staking product will close permanently and no further staking positions can be opened, creating a first-come structure that could encourage early participation while also limiting the long-term availability of the rewards.

The launch gives $WHALE holders a fresh utility layer at a time when crypto gaming platforms are trying to deepen user retention through token-based incentives. Whale. io has positioned $WHALE as the native utility token for its ecosystem, with uses tied to gameplay, platform activity, rewards and community participation. The company says distribution has been linked to gameplay, missions and user activity, rather than private sales, presales or venture capital allocations.

Participation requires users to hold $WHALE in a Whale. io account balance. Staking positions can be opened from the platform’s token page by selecting the token amount and preferred lock-up period. The system allows up to 10 active staking positions per account, each with its own allocation, lock period and completion timer. Early withdrawal is not available once a staking position has been created.

The absence of early withdrawal is central to the product’s risk profile. Fixed lock-ups may support platform liquidity planning and reduce short-term sell pressure, but they also prevent users from exiting during market volatility. High stated APYs can lose appeal if the token price falls sharply during the lock period, a familiar risk across crypto staking and yield products.

Whale. io operates in a crowded crypto gaming segment where platforms compete through cashback, sportsbook features, original games, loyalty rewards and token-linked incentives. The company’s public materials describe the platform as a crypto casino and sportsbook with blockchain-integrated rewards, multi-currency support and on-chain verifiability. Its token page frames $WHALE as an in-platform asset rather than a passive investment instrument.

The staking launch follows earlier moves by Whale. io to expand the $WHALE ecosystem, including token-linked campaigns and digital asset features aimed at converting user engagement into token utility. The wider strategy appears focused on keeping users inside the platform by connecting play, rewards and staking into a single loop.

Regulatory scrutiny remains a major backdrop for crypto-linked gaming businesses. Crypto casino operators face overlapping questions around financial promotions, consumer protection, gambling regulation, token disclosure and anti-money laundering compliance. Products offering high returns can attract added attention, particularly where retail users may not fully understand token volatility, lock-up risk or the difference between fixed token rewards and guaranteed fiat-value returns.

The broader digital asset market has also become more sensitive to how projects describe yield. Staking products vary widely, from blockchain validation mechanisms to centralised reward pools and promotional incentive schemes. Whale Printer appears to fall into the latter category, with rewards paid from a finite platform-designated allocation rather than from external yield generation.

That structure makes transparency over pool depletion, eligibility, minimum staking requirements and reward calculations important for users assessing the product. A finite pool can help cap token emissions, but it may also create urgency that encourages users to lock funds before fully considering price risk and platform-specific exposure.

For Whale. io, the product could strengthen engagement among existing token holders and create another reason for users to maintain balances on the platform. For participants, the attraction lies in the defined reward schedule and high headline APYs. The trade-off is reduced flexibility, exposure to $WHALE price movements and reliance on the platform’s continued operation during the lock-up period.

Whale Printer is now available through Whale. io’s token page, marking a notable expansion of $WHALE utility as crypto gaming platforms continue to combine entertainment, loyalty mechanics and token economics in search of stickier user ecosystems.

Arabian Post – Crypto News Network

The article Whale.io rolls out token staking tool appeared first on Arabian Post.

ADA traded around $0.19 on Thursday after dropping more than 12 per cent over 24 hours, taking its one-year decline to about 70 per cent and pushing the token to levels not seen for more than five years. The slide left Cardano with a market value of roughly $7bn, far below the peak reached during the 2021 digital-asset boom, when ADA traded above $3.

Hoskinson’s brief message on X followed sharper remarks on the state of the ecosystem, where several projects have struggled to secure capital, retain teams or justify operating costs in a weaker market. He warned that more Cardano-linked ventures could fail unless funding, demand and community coordination improve.

The immediate pressure came after TapTools, one of the most visible analytics platforms serving Cardano traders and decentralised finance users, said it would wind down operations within two weeks. The platform cited the departure of senior executives, technical staff shortages and rising infrastructure costs. TapTools had operated for about four years and became a common dashboard for monitoring Cardano tokens, liquidity pools and market activity.

The shutdown landed days after the Cardano Foundation cancelled Cardano Summit 2026 in Singapore. The event had been planned for October 5 and 6, but a treasury funding proposal failed to secure the required approval threshold under Cardano’s on-chain governance process. A revised request for 7.8 million ADA, worth roughly $2m at the time, received majority support but fell short of the two-thirds threshold needed to pass.

The vote has become a test case for Cardano’s Voltaire governance model, which gives delegated representatives and ADA holders a direct role in treasury spending. Supporters argue that the rejection showed fiscal discipline and community control. Critics say it exposed the difficulty of financing strategic ecosystem activity when market sentiment is weak and the community is divided over priorities.

Cardano remains one of the better-known proof-of-stake blockchains, built around peer-reviewed research, formal methods and a slower development culture than some rival networks. Its supporters say that approach has produced resilience, decentralisation and a committed global community. Detractors say the network has lagged Ethereum, Solana and newer layer-1 and layer-2 ecosystems in developer activity, decentralised finance liquidity and consumer-facing applications.

Data from decentralised finance trackers places Cardano’s total value locked at about $118m, a modest figure compared with larger smart-contract networks. That gap has sharpened scrutiny of whether the ecosystem can turn its technical roadmap into sustained commercial traction. Key Cardano applications, including decentralised exchanges, lending projects and NFT marketplaces, have faced the same pressures affecting smaller crypto ventures across the market: thinning liquidity, reduced user activity and limited investor appetite.

The weakness in ADA also reflects a broader split across crypto markets. Bitcoin has drawn stronger institutional demand through exchange-traded products and corporate treasury buying, while many older altcoins have struggled to recover from earlier cycle highs. Traders have become more selective, favouring networks with faster revenue growth, larger stablecoin flows and clearer links to real-world usage.

Arabian Post – Crypto News Network

The article Cardano sell-off deepens as governance strains bite appeared first on Arabian Post.

The slide extended a difficult stretch for the world’s largest cryptocurrency, which has moved sharply lower after failing to hold above key support levels near $70,000. Selling accelerated as investors reduced exposure to risk assets, with traders citing persistent outflows from Bitcoin exchange-traded funds, liquidation of leveraged positions and uncertainty over the direction of US interest rates.

Bitcoin’s slide exposes market fragility after months in which institutional flows had been seen as a stabilising force for the asset class. US-listed spot Bitcoin funds, which helped drive earlier rallies by opening the market to a wider base of regulated investors, have faced sustained withdrawals. The reversal has weakened one of the main pillars of demand and has forced traders to reassess whether long-term institutional allocation remains strong enough to absorb sharper corrections.

Digital asset investment products recorded outflows of about $1.67 billion last week, extending a three-week redemption run to more than $4 billion. Bitcoin accounted for the bulk of those withdrawals, while assets under management across crypto investment products fell to their lowest level since early April. The pace of withdrawals has amplified concerns that large investors are taking profits, cutting risk or moving capital into competing opportunities in equities and fixed income.

The sell-off has also been shaped by forced liquidation in derivatives markets. Leveraged long positions were unwound as Bitcoin broke through technical levels watched closely by algorithmic traders and short-term funds. Such liquidation cascades often deepen price declines because exchanges automatically close positions when collateral falls below required thresholds, creating additional sell orders in already thin market conditions.

Broader financial conditions have added to the pressure. Expectations that the Federal Reserve may keep rates elevated have reduced appetite for speculative assets, while firm Treasury yields have made cash and bonds more attractive relative to volatile digital tokens. Inflation concerns linked to energy prices and geopolitical tensions have complicated the outlook for monetary policy, leaving investors less willing to assume that liquidity conditions will improve quickly.

Bitcoin’s weakness has contrasted with the resilience of parts of the equity market, where artificial intelligence-linked stocks have continued to attract capital. That divergence has raised questions about whether Bitcoin is still benefiting from the same risk-on flows that supported it during earlier rallies. For much of the past year, traders treated the token as a high-beta asset tied to liquidity expectations, technology sentiment and momentum in speculative markets. The latest downturn suggests that relationship has become more selective.

Market attention has also focused on corporate Bitcoin holders. Strategy, the company long associated with Michael Saylor’s aggressive Bitcoin accumulation strategy, drew scrutiny after selling a small number of coins to fund a preferred stock dividend. The sale was minor compared with its overall holdings, but it unsettled investors because the company has been viewed as a symbol of corporate conviction in Bitcoin. Even limited selling by such a prominent holder can have an outsized psychological impact during a falling market.

The decline has affected sentiment across the wider digital asset complex. Ether and other major tokens have weakened, while smaller coins have faced sharper losses as liquidity thinned. Traders have become more selective, favouring assets with clear regulatory pathways, institutional use cases or strong liquidity. Tokens linked to speculative narratives have suffered heavier selling as investors move away from higher-risk corners of the market.

Regulatory developments remain a key variable. The crypto industry continues to push for clearer rules covering market structure, stablecoins, custody and exchange oversight. Supporters argue that stronger legal clarity could draw more institutional capital into the sector, while sceptics say regulation alone will not restore demand if macroeconomic conditions remain restrictive and fund flows continue to weaken.

Arabian Post – Crypto News Network

The article Bitcoin sell-off tests institutional faith appeared first on Arabian Post.

The agreement, announced on June 1, 2026, will integrate DOGE into Paxos’s enterprise crypto platform, allowing Paxos clients to offer buying, selling, holding and transfer functions for the token where they choose to enable it. The arrangement does not automatically make Dogecoin available across every consumer app connected to Paxos, but it gives those platforms a compliant route to add the asset without building custody, liquidity and regulatory systems from scratch.

House of Doge, the commercial arm aligned with the Dogecoin Foundation, has positioned the deal as part of a broader strategy to turn Dogecoin from a community-driven token into a more usable payments and commerce asset. Paxos brings a regulated infrastructure layer already used by financial firms and consumer-facing platforms, giving DOGE access to rails that support digital asset services across a wide international footprint.

The companies said the integration could expose Dogecoin to a client network reaching hundreds of millions of users in more than 150 countries, subject to platform-level adoption and local regulatory requirements. Paxos’s role is expected to cover custody, brokerage, liquidity and compliance functions, areas that have become critical for institutions weighing whether to support crypto assets beyond Bitcoin, Ethereum and stablecoins.

The partnership comes as Dogecoin backers seek to reshape the token’s reputation. Created in 2013 as a parody of crypto speculation, DOGE developed one of the sector’s largest retail communities and has periodically drawn attention from high-profile supporters. Its long-term challenge has been converting popularity into sustained transaction use, particularly as regulators, payment companies and brokerages demand stronger controls around custody, market access and consumer protection.

House of Doge has accelerated that commercial push through partnerships covering payments, consumer apps, asset tokenisation and institutional access. Its public-market connection through Brag House Holdings has also given the project a more visible corporate structure at a time when crypto firms are increasingly using regulated partnerships to reach mainstream users.

Paxos, based in New York, has built its business around digital asset infrastructure for enterprises rather than direct retail speculation. Its services span token issuance, custody, trading and settlement. The firm operates under regulatory oversight in the United States, Singapore and Europe, and has been associated with products and services used by PayPal, Interactive Brokers, Mercado Libre and other financial platforms.

That regulated profile is central to the Dogecoin deal. Large fintech operators are generally reluctant to list additional crypto assets unless they can rely on established compliance, custody and liquidity arrangements. By using Paxos’s infrastructure, Dogecoin can be made available through an institutional channel rather than through loosely regulated exchange listings alone.

Still, the commercial impact will depend on adoption decisions by Paxos clients. The agreement creates technical and regulatory capacity for Dogecoin support, but individual platforms will decide whether to add DOGE based on market demand, risk appetite, jurisdictional rules and internal product priorities. That distinction is important because consumer access through well-known apps would require further steps beyond the partnership announcement.

Market reaction around Dogecoin has remained tied to broader memecoin sentiment, liquidity conditions and risk appetite across digital assets. DOGE remains among the larger crypto tokens by market value, but its price has historically been volatile, with trading often influenced by retail flows, social media attention and shifts in speculative demand.

The deal also reflects a wider trend in digital assets: infrastructure providers are becoming gatekeepers for institutional crypto access. Rather than each fintech company building separate custody and trading systems, firms such as Paxos, Zero Hash and others offer back-end services that allow consumer brands, brokers and payment providers to add crypto products under a more controlled framework.

For House of Doge, the Paxos link strengthens the case that Dogecoin can move beyond its meme identity. For Paxos, adding DOGE broadens the range of assets available to clients at a time when demand for regulated crypto access is expanding across trading apps, payment platforms and digital wallets.

Regulatory scrutiny remains a key constraint. Authorities in major markets continue to examine token listings, consumer disclosures, custody practices and anti-money-laundering controls. Dogecoin’s lack of a fixed supply cap and its origins as a community coin may still make some institutions cautious, even as its liquidity and brand recognition give it advantages over smaller speculative tokens.

Arabian Post – Crypto News Network

The article Dogecoin gains broader rails through Paxos appeared first on Arabian Post.

The network has since returned to operation, but the episode has sharpened scrutiny of Sui’s upgrade process because the outages occurred in close succession and interrupted transaction processing across core settlement infrastructure. The Sui Foundation said user funds were not at risk and committed transactions were not reversed when the chain resumed activity.

The first outage began at about 7am Pacific Time on May 28 and ended around 1.30pm. A second halt began at about 5am on May 29 and ended around 8.30am. A third disruption started at about 1.30pm the same day and ended close to 7.20pm. Status updates later showed validator participation recovering, with the network marked resolved after participation by stake reached up to 93 per cent.

The initial fault arose after v1.72 introduced address balances, a feature designed to give users another way to hold funds and pay gas without relying only on coin objects. The problem appeared when transactions used a mix of address balances and coin objects for gas. Under a narrow set of conditions, a transaction cancelled for insufficient funds could still be processed by a gas-smashing routine, producing a negative balance delta and causing validator crashes.

Sui’s core team first deployed an interim fix to bring the network back while a fuller repair was prepared. That decision restored service more quickly but carried a known low-probability risk. The second outage followed when a related variant surfaced: the insufficient-funds error was masked by another cancellation reason, allowing the underflow issue to bypass the first patch.

The third disruption had a different immediate trigger. Validator restarts connected to the stronger fix exposed a latent bug in how randomness state was preserved across restarts. Randomness is used by applications that require unpredictable outputs, including certain gaming, lottery and NFT functions. When the next epoch change arrived, the affected state handling contributed to another halt.

The outages have landed at a sensitive time for Sui, which has marketed itself as a high-performance blockchain capable of parallel transaction execution and low-latency settlement. Its technical pitch has attracted developers building decentralised finance, gaming and consumer applications, but reliability is now a central concern for users and infrastructure partners that depend on predictable uptime.

Market reaction reflected that concern. SUI fell during the disruption window, with trading data showing a sharp decline as block production stalled and confidence weakened. The token was down by a wider margin over the week as traders assessed whether repeated halts could slow network adoption or raise the risk premium attached to Sui-based applications.

The incident also adds to a longer record of operational stress on the network. Sui had suffered a transaction scheduling-related halt in November 2024 and another prolonged disruption in January 2026 linked to validator consensus processing. While outages are not unique to Sui among high-throughput blockchains, repeated full-network interruptions can affect developer confidence, exchange monitoring, institutional custody assessment and the willingness of decentralised applications to depend on one settlement layer.

The foundation’s explanation indicates that the failures did not stem from a single consensus collapse but from the interaction of new accounting features with existing execution safeguards. That distinction matters because address-balance functionality is intended to make Sui easier to use, yet the bug showed how usability improvements can introduce edge cases in systems where gas accounting, conservation checks and validator determinism must align precisely.

For developers, the main issue is not only that a bug occurred, but that each stage of remediation created exposure to another failure mode. The interim patch restored activity, the stronger gas fix required validator coordination, and validator restarts then revealed the randomness-state problem. That sequence underscores the difficulty of upgrading live blockchain infrastructure where safety, speed and decentralised validator adoption must be balanced under market pressure.

Sui’s response now turns on whether it can translate the post-mortem into stricter testing, better simulation of mixed gas-payment cases, more conservative rollout gates and clearer procedures for validator upgrades. The project’s own analysis points to gas charging as an area that needs the same code-quality standard as core execution and consensus components, a recognition likely to shape future releases.

Arabian Post – Crypto News Network

The article Sui upgrade faults trigger reliability test appeared first on Arabian Post.

The service allows eligible users to transfer UAE dirhams through a regulated financial channel and convert funds into USDT and USDC, reducing reliance on dollar-linked payment routes, card transactions and informal transfer methods. Transactions are processed in AED, removing foreign exchange conversion at the entry point and offering users a clearer link between their bank accounts and digital-asset activity.

The new transfer option operates through Roma, a VARA-licensed provider that offers fiat-to-virtual-asset conversion and bank transfer services. Users initiate the process through Binance, select AED as the payment currency and use bank transfer to complete purchases or withdrawals. Once funds are received by the regulated provider, the corresponding stablecoin balance is credited to the user’s Binance account, while withdrawals allow users to convert supported stablecoins back into dirhams.

The launch marks another step in Binance’s efforts to build locally regulated services in the UAE after its Dubai entity secured a Virtual Asset Service Provider licence from the Virtual Assets Regulatory Authority. The licence allows Binance FZE to offer services to retail, qualified and institutional clients under Dubai’s virtual-asset rulebook, including exchange, broker-dealer, lending and borrowing, and virtual-asset management and investment services.

The Client Money Account framework is central to the new arrangement. It is intended to keep client funds subject to regulated controls, with segregation and oversight designed to reduce risks linked to commingling, operational failures and opaque fund handling. For users, the practical appeal lies in a more direct banking route, same-business-day processing in many cases and fewer intermediaries between conventional bank accounts and crypto platforms.

UAE authorities have sought to combine market access with tighter supervision as digital-asset adoption expands across the country. Dubai’s VARA regulates virtual-asset activity across the emirate outside the Dubai International Financial Centre, while Abu Dhabi Global Market and the Dubai International Financial Centre maintain their own frameworks through separate financial regulators. The Central Bank of the UAE has also advanced rules for payment tokens and stablecoin-related services, reflecting the wider push to bring crypto-linked payments into supervised channels.

For Binance, the AED transfer service strengthens its local proposition at a time when competition among regulated crypto platforms is increasing. Banks, exchanges, custodians and fintech providers are racing to offer compliant fiat rails as users demand faster ways to move between bank deposits and digital assets. RAKBANK has already moved into crypto brokerage through a regulated partner, while other UAE-based providers have expanded custody, trading and stablecoin infrastructure.

Stablecoins remain the main bridge between fiat money and crypto markets. USDT and USDC are widely used by traders seeking dollar-linked liquidity, but local-currency access has often been limited by banking restrictions, processing delays and compliance checks. A regulated AED channel may make crypto transactions more accessible for UAE users who want to avoid routing funds through foreign currencies before entering the market.

The timing also reflects Binance’s broader effort to rebuild regulatory credibility after intense scrutiny in major markets. The exchange has made licensing and compliance a central part of its international strategy, with the UAE emerging as one of its most important regulated hubs. Its local platform gives Binance a clearer operational base in a jurisdiction that has positioned itself as a digital-asset centre while imposing formal requirements on licensing, governance, anti-money laundering controls and client protection.

Risks remain for users. Stablecoins are not bank deposits, virtual assets can face market, operational and regulatory disruptions, and client money safeguards do not remove all exposure to technology failures, fraud or liquidity stress. Regulators have repeatedly emphasised that crypto investors should understand product risks before placing funds into digital assets, even when services operate through licensed entities.

Arabian Post – Crypto News Network

The article Binance deepens UAE crypto access appeared first on Arabian Post.

The token traded around $2.11, with daily turnover above $22m and a market value of about $1.48bn, supported by a circulating supply of roughly 700m BGB. The move placed BGB ahead of the broader crypto market over the past week, even as the wider digital asset complex remained uneven and traders continued to favour tokens tied to exchange activity, fee rebates and platform utility.

Bitget’s push has centred on a series of campaigns designed to stimulate spot, derivatives and ecosystem participation. A 48-hour SOL trading competition offered a 40,000 USDT prize pool to high-volume participants, while other platform promotions have targeted VIP users, stock-linked perpetual traders and community engagement. The incentives do not directly alter BGB’s tokenomics, but they increase activity around the exchange and reinforce the token’s role within Bitget’s broader product structure.

BGB’s recovery follows a difficult stretch for exchange-linked tokens, which have struggled to hold investor interest when crypto volumes softened and risk appetite rotated towards Bitcoin, Ethereum and selected high-beta altcoins. Exchange tokens tend to perform best when platform volumes rise, new products gain traction and users have a practical reason to hold or use the asset. That dynamic appears to be returning to Bitget as the company expands beyond conventional crypto trading.

A key part of the latest market narrative is Bitget’s Delta Neutral Mode, a unified account feature aimed at traders using hedging, funding-rate arbitrage, basis trading and quantitative strategies. The tool allows eligible users to combine spot, cross-margin and futures positions while the system evaluates exposure at the account and asset level. Properly hedged positions may receive lower auto-deleveraging priority during extreme market conditions, a feature aimed at more sophisticated users rather than casual retail traders.

Bitget has also been positioning itself as a “Universal Exchange”, widening access to tokenised stocks, commodities, foreign exchange-linked products and pre-market perpetual contracts. The exchange launched a perpetual contract linked to OpenAI’s potential public listing and has promoted stock futures competitions as part of a broader attempt to bridge crypto-native trading with traditional market exposure. That strategy has helped distinguish the platform from exchanges focused mainly on spot crypto listings and standard futures markets.

The exchange’s latest proof-of-reserves update showed user holdings of more than 24,000 BTC, 180,000 ETH, 1.95bn USDT and 179m USDC, signalling a sizeable asset base despite competitive pressure across centralised exchanges. Bitget has also highlighted growth in AI-assisted trading tools, with more than one million users and over $1.2bn in trading volume generated through AI-linked features. These claims have strengthened the platform’s growth narrative, though traders remain cautious about promotional metrics that can rise quickly during campaign-heavy periods.

BGB’s utility remains tied to fee discounts, launch access, staking-related products and ecosystem privileges. That gives it a clearer use case than many speculative altcoins, but it also means the token is highly exposed to Bitget’s ability to sustain trading activity. A slowdown in campaign participation, regulatory pressure on derivatives products or weaker demand for exchange incentives could quickly weigh on sentiment.

Technical positioning has improved after the latest rebound, with traders watching whether BGB can hold above the $2 area and convert short-term demand into a broader recovery. A sustained move above the May trading range would strengthen the case for renewed accumulation, while failure to hold current levels could reinforce the view that the rally is mainly incentive-driven.

Arabian Post – Crypto News Network

The article Bitget token rebounds on trading push appeared first on Arabian Post.

The token traded around $73,900 on Saturday after a volatile week in which it fell close to $72,600, its weakest level since mid-April. The move followed a sharp risk-off turn across digital assets after fresh US strikes on Iranian facilities unsettled markets and triggered a wave of leveraged liquidations. Ether held near $2,025, while several major altcoins continued to trade below levels seen earlier in May.

CryptoQuant’s latest assessment has added weight to the bearish case. The on-chain analytics firm has flagged a stall in whale accumulation, with addresses holding between 1,000 and 10,000 Bitcoin no longer providing the kind of structural demand that helped absorb selling pressure during earlier phases of the cycle. Annual balance growth among these large wallets has turned negative, while monthly growth has been broadly flat since February.

That pattern matters because whale buying has often acted as a stabilising force during market drawdowns. When large holders accumulate into weakness, it can signal confidence in the long-term price floor. When they stop buying, or begin trimming positions, the burden shifts to exchange-traded funds, retail traders and corporate buyers to absorb supply. Current data suggest that support has thinned at the same time as macro and geopolitical risks have increased.

CryptoQuant chief executive Ki Young Ju has warned that Bitcoin’s bear market may last until early 2027 if historical profit-and-loss cycles repeat. His argument rests on the behaviour of investor profitability after major trend reversals. Past downturns in 2014, 2018 and 2022 saw investor profit-and-loss indicators weaken for roughly 18 months before a durable recovery emerged. The current downtrend is being traced back to October 2025, when Bitcoin peaked above $126,000 before beginning a prolonged correction.

Bitcoin is now more than 40 per cent below that record, despite intermittent rebounds linked to expectations of easier monetary policy and renewed institutional demand. The price briefly recovered above $80,000 earlier this month, but the advance failed to hold as spot demand weakened and profit-taking resumed. Market participants have also been watching the $55,000 area cited by on-chain analysts as a possible reference zone in a deeper capitulation phase, though Bitcoin remains well above that level.

Exchange-traded fund flows have become a central pressure point. US spot Bitcoin funds recorded heavy redemptions during the week, including a one-day outflow of about $733 million on May 27. BlackRock’s iShares Bitcoin Trust accounted for the largest share of those withdrawals, with more than $527 million leaving the product in a single session. That move marked one of the sharpest reversals for a vehicle that had previously served as a gateway for institutional exposure to Bitcoin.

The pullback in ETF demand coincided with reduced buying activity from Strategy, the corporate holder whose purchases have often supported market sentiment. Strategy has accumulated a large Bitcoin position over several years, but its ability to keep adding aggressively depends partly on financing conditions and investor appetite for its securities. A slower pace of corporate buying removes another pillar that had helped offset selling by long-term holders and short-term traders.

Leverage amplified the latest decline. Nearly $1 billion in crypto positions were liquidated during the market slide, with long positions bearing most of the damage. Forced selling can accelerate price moves because exchanges automatically close positions when collateral falls below required levels. That dynamic often deepens downside volatility during geopolitical shocks, particularly when liquidity is thin.

The broader market backdrop remains difficult for speculative assets. Oil-price sensitivity linked to the US-Iran confrontation has revived concerns about inflation, while uncertainty over the Federal Reserve’s policy path continues to shape risk appetite. Bitcoin has often benefited from expectations of lower interest rates, but the argument becomes less persuasive when geopolitical stress strengthens demand for cash and reduces exposure to volatile assets.

Long-term holders have not abandoned the market, and Bitcoin’s supply held by committed investors remains high. That provides some resilience, but it also creates a challenge: without new demand, dormant supply can become a source of pressure when holders take profits or seek liquidity. A market with high long-term-holder supply, shrinking whale demand and ETF outflows needs a strong catalyst to rebuild momentum.

For now, traders are watching whether Bitcoin can hold above the low-$70,000 range and whether ETF flows stabilise after the heavy withdrawals. A recovery in whale accumulation would be an important signal that large investors see value at current prices. Without that shift, rallies may continue to face selling pressure from holders using rebounds to reduce exposure.

Arabian Post – Crypto News Network

The article Whale retreat deepens Bitcoin pressure appeared first on Arabian Post.

The digital asset manager’s assessment places Hyperliquid among the most closely watched platforms in decentralised finance, citing its growth in perpetual futures, expanding product range and token-linked economics as signs that the project is moving beyond a specialist crypto trading venue. The argument rests on a broader shift in digital markets: high-speed, always-on exchanges are beginning to compete with parts of the traditional financial market structure once dominated by centralised brokers, derivatives venues and clearing infrastructure.

Hyperliquid’s core product is a decentralised exchange built around perpetual futures, derivatives contracts with no expiry date that allow traders to take leveraged positions on asset prices. The platform operates on its own Layer 1 blockchain and uses an on-chain order book, a model designed to mimic the speed and depth of centralised exchanges while retaining self-custody and blockchain transparency. Its documentation says HyperCore supports fully on-chain perpetual futures and spot order books, with orders, trades and liquidations processed transparently through the network.

Grayscale’s thesis is that Hyperliquid’s infrastructure could be used for a much wider set of financial activities than crypto-native futures. The platform already supports spot markets and has moved into contracts tied to commodities, indices and other market exposures. That expansion has strengthened comparisons with conventional exchange groups, though Hyperliquid remains far smaller, less regulated and more exposed to volatility than established operators in global capital markets.

Trading metrics have helped fuel the institutional interest. Hyperliquid processed about $2.9 trillion in perpetual futures volume in 2025 and has been ranked among the largest crypto perpetual futures venues by open interest. Its HYPE token has also become a central part of the investment case, with market value, trading volume and buyback-linked demand drawing scrutiny from funds looking for assets tied to exchange activity rather than purely narrative-driven token cycles.

The HYPE token has climbed sharply during 2026, supported by stronger platform activity and speculation that decentralised derivatives markets could capture a larger share of global crypto trading. Market data showed HYPE ranked among the largest digital assets by capitalisation, with daily trading volume above $1 billion during the latest rally. The token’s performance has made Hyperliquid one of the standout DeFi stories of the year, but it has also raised concerns that valuations may be running ahead of execution risk.

The wider market backdrop is favourable but complicated. Perpetual futures trading across crypto markets reached $61.7 trillion in 2025, far above spot crypto trading, as traders sought leveraged exposure to volatile assets. U. S. regulators have begun allowing regulated perpetual futures products, with Coinbase and Kalshi moving to offer such contracts to domestic users under Commodity Futures Trading Commission oversight. That development could validate demand for the product category while increasing competition for offshore and decentralised venues.

Hyperliquid’s supporters argue that its advantage lies in combining exchange-grade performance with decentralised custody. Unlike many DeFi protocols that depend on automated market makers, Hyperliquid uses an order book structure familiar to professional traders. Its HyperEVM component allows developers to build applications that can interact with the platform’s trading infrastructure, potentially widening the network’s role from a derivatives exchange into a broader financial application layer.

The platform’s move into prediction markets has added another dimension. Its first live prediction market was tied to U. S. inflation data, signalling interest in outcome-based products beyond token prices. Such markets could open new revenue lines, but they also bring additional design and regulatory challenges, especially around market integrity, liquidity, settlement and the risk of information advantages among participants.

Risks remain significant. Perpetual futures are high-risk products because leverage can magnify losses rapidly. Investor advocates have warned that retail traders may not fully understand liquidation mechanics, funding rates and the speed at which positions can move against them. Hyperliquid’s decentralised model also raises questions over regulatory perimeter, user protection, governance, market surveillance and access by restricted jurisdictions.

Competition is intensifying as centralised exchanges, brokerages and regulated prediction market operators seek to capture demand for perpetual futures. Kraken, Coinbase, Robinhood, Gemini and Kalshi are among the firms positioning around the product category, while established exchange groups are watching whether crypto-style perpetuals can be brought into regulated markets without excessive leverage and systemic risk.

The article Hyperliquid expands its DeFi ambitions appeared first on Arabian Post.

The Block-owned platform now allows users to send and receive USD Coin without managing a separate stablecoin wallet. USDC sent into Cash App is converted automatically into US dollars, while outgoing payments can be made from a user’s dollar balance to an external blockchain wallet. The design keeps the customer interface close to conventional payments, even as settlement takes place on public blockchain networks.

The rollout gives Cash App’s 59 million monthly transacting customers access to USDC across Solana, Ethereum, Polygon and Arbitrum. Stablecoin transfers are being offered without fees at launch, though the company has described that as a limited-time arrangement. The service is not available to New York residents, and users face the same risks attached to public-chain transfers, including the possibility of permanent loss if funds are sent to the wrong address or an unsupported network.

The move marks a significant widening of Cash App’s crypto utility. Until now, its digital asset identity has been closely tied to Bitcoin, reflecting the long-standing conviction of Block co-founder Jack Dorsey that Bitcoin offers the strongest foundation for open, borderless finance. Cash App has positioned USDC as a practical complement rather than a replacement, arguing that stablecoins can familiarise mainstream users with open payment rails before they engage more deeply with Bitcoin.

“As stablecoins continue to gain global adoption, we see an opportunity to get millions more Cash App customers comfortable using open financial rails,” said Miles Suter, Bitcoin product lead at Block. “Once they’re on those rails, they’re one step closer to bitcoin.”

Stablecoins have gained ground as a payments and settlement tool because they combine the price reference of fiat currency with the speed and programmability of blockchain networks. USDC, issued by Circle, is designed to maintain a one-to-one value with the US dollar and is backed by cash and short-dated, high-quality liquid assets. Its use has expanded beyond crypto trading into cross-border transfers, merchant settlement, fintech infrastructure and institutional treasury operations.

Cash App’s approach differs from crypto exchanges that require customers to hold, trade or manage stablecoins directly. The app hides most of the blockchain complexity from users by handling sourcing, conversion and settlement in the background. A customer receiving USDC sees dollars in the Cash App balance, while a customer sending USDC pays from the same dollar balance used for everyday transactions.

That structure may help Block broaden adoption among users who want faster or more flexible money movement without taking on the operational burden of a self-custody wallet. It could also make Cash App more relevant in payments corridors where stablecoins are already used to move digital dollars between exchanges, fintech apps, wallets and merchants.

The timing reflects a broader shift in the US financial technology market. Payment companies, banks and crypto firms are moving to capture stablecoin flows as regulatory clarity improves. The GENIUS Act has created a federal framework for payment stablecoins, including expectations around reserve assets, redemption standards, anti-money laundering controls and sanctions compliance. Regulators are still shaping implementation, but the law has strengthened the case for regulated stablecoins as payment infrastructure.

Competition is intensifying. PayPal has its own dollar-backed stablecoin, Coinbase remains a major distribution partner for USDC, Stripe has expanded stablecoin payment services, and SoFi has moved deeper into blockchain-based dollar products. Cash App enters the field with a large retail base, a familiar peer-to-peer payments interface and an existing Bitcoin franchise, giving it an advantage in turning stablecoin transfers into a mainstream feature rather than a specialist crypto tool.

For Block, the integration also supports a wider strategy built around open financial networks. Cash App already offers Bitcoin buying and selling, Bitcoin payments through the Lightning Network and tools aimed at bringing digital assets closer to everyday spending. USDC gives the platform a dollar-denominated layer that may appeal to customers who are not ready to hold volatile assets but still want blockchain-enabled transfers.

The article Cash App broadens payments with USDC access appeared first on Arabian Post.

The divergence sharpened after the S&P 500 completed a ninth consecutive weekly advance, its longest winning streak since 2023, while Brent crude stabilised near $92 a barrel on hopes that Washington and Tehran could extend a ceasefire and ease pressure on energy markets. The shift helped equities and other risk-sensitive assets, but crypto markets remained under strain as exchange-traded fund demand cooled and traders cut exposure to benchmark tokens.

Bitcoin hovered near the lower end of its May range after failing to hold momentum above $80,000 earlier in the month. Ether also weakened, while XRP and dogecoin lagged despite intermittent inflows into selected alternative-token products. The price action highlighted a more selective market in which investors are no longer treating all crypto assets as a broad risk-on trade.

Hyperliquid’s HYPE token stood out as the only major name to rally, supported by fresh demand for products linked to the decentralised derivatives platform and by interest in its fee-driven buyback mechanics. The token’s outperformance contrasted with redemptions from bitcoin and ether funds, suggesting that capital has not left digital assets entirely but has rotated towards narrower themes with stronger short-term catalysts.

US-listed spot bitcoin ETFs, which had been central to the market’s 2024 and 2025 institutional adoption narrative, faced a renewed wave of withdrawals during May. Ether products also saw persistent outflows, underscoring weaker appetite among professional investors after a stretch of price volatility, rising geopolitical risk and uncertainty over the next phase of US crypto regulation.

The softness has come even as broader markets have taken encouragement from falling oil prices, solid corporate earnings and continued enthusiasm around artificial intelligence-linked shares. Technology stocks helped drive the S&P 500 higher, while the Nasdaq also benefited from renewed demand for chipmakers, server manufacturers and companies tied to AI infrastructure spending.

Crypto’s failure to track that rally points to a change in market structure. During earlier phases of the cycle, bitcoin often moved in line with high-growth technology assets as traders priced in looser financial conditions and rising liquidity. This time, bitcoin’s response has been muted, with ETF flows, regulatory timing and technical trading levels exerting more influence than the broader equity rally.

Oil’s retreat offered another test of bitcoin’s role in macro portfolios. Brent’s fall from levels above $100 to near $92 reduced fears of an inflation shock and helped ease pressure on risk assets. Yet bitcoin did not attract the kind of safe-haven or liquidity-driven demand that some long-term advocates had expected during geopolitical stress. Gold and government bonds retained a more conventional role in hedging uncertainty, while bitcoin traded more like a speculative asset exposed to funding conditions.

Market participants have also been watching the US legislative calendar. Pending crypto market-structure rules and stablecoin legislation remain important for exchanges, token issuers and asset managers. A clearer framework could support institutional participation, but delays or political disputes may keep larger investors cautious, particularly after several weeks of ETF redemptions.

Ether’s weakness reflects additional challenges. The network remains central to decentralised finance, tokenisation and stablecoin settlement, but its investment case has been complicated by competition from faster blockchains, subdued fee revenue and uncertainty over whether ETF access alone can produce sustained demand. Ether products have not matched the scale of bitcoin ETF adoption, leaving the asset more vulnerable when risk appetite cools.

XRP has shown relative resilience compared with some large-cap tokens, helped by expectations around payment use cases and fund inflows, but it has not escaped the broader drag from weaker crypto liquidity. Dogecoin remains more sensitive to speculative retail flows and social-media-driven momentum, both of which have been subdued as traders focus on macro headlines and exchange-traded fund data.

Arabian Post – Crypto News Network

The article Crypto majors trail stocks as ETF flows fade appeared first on Arabian Post.