Next Week Could Mark A Make Or Break For Netanyahu’s Political Future

The coming week or two could determine Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu’s political fate and reshape the Biden administration’s support for Israel’s Gaza war. That is, if Netanyahu fails to comply with war cabinet member Benny Gantz’s demand that the prime minister produce a plan for the post-war administration of GaIf Gantz resigns, he will likely be joined by fellow war cabinet member and former Israel Defence Forces (IDF) chief of staff Gabi Eisenkot.

Gantz has good reason to stand by his ultimatum. A recent Israeli opinion poll suggests that while he would still win an election, continued presence in the government is beginning to cost him. The poll showed Gantz at 38 per cent, down from his 46 per cent high in January, while Netanyahu’s numbers increased to 30 per cent, up from 24 per cent six months ago. While Netanyahu would still lose in an election, the poll suggests Gantz can ill-afford to risk his popularity further.

One of four scenarios is likely to unfold depending on what Gantz decides and was probably part of US President Joe Biden’s decision to officially announce his Qatar and Egypt-backed ceasefire plan in a bid to pressure both Hamas and Israel:

Netanyahu could stall until his address to the US Congress on July 24. He could dump his most militant ultra-nationalist and ultra-conservative coalition partners, represented by National Security Minister Itamar Ben Gvir and Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich, who oppose a ceasefire deal that would lead to the release of Hamas-held hostages. Instead, Netanyahu could form a government cooperating with Gantz, opposition leader Yair Lapid, and two religious coalition partners, Shas and United Torah Judaism, who favour a ceasefire and hostage deal.

Another possibility is for Netanyahu to roll the dice and call for snap elections if Gantz and Eisenkot resign. Lastly, Gantz and Eisenkot could resign, leaving Netanyahu even more beholden to. Ben Gvir and Smotrich. Ben Gvir and Smotrich sought to limit Netanyahu’s space in ceasefire negotiations with tens of thousands of their supporters marching on Jerusalem Flag Day through Jerusalem’s Muslim Quarter to celebrate Israel’s conquest of East Jerusalem in the 1967 Middle East war.

Participating in the march, Ben Gvir said it sent Hamas a message that “Jerusalem is ours.” Referring to one of the gates to the old city, of which the Muslim Quarter is part, and the Temple Mount that hosts the Al Aqsa Mosque, Islam’s third holiest site, Ben Gvir asserted that the “Damascus Gate is ours. The Temple Mount is ours, and, God willing, complete victory is ours.”

Militant Ben Gvir followers attacked Palestinian residents and journalists, chanting “Death to the Arabs,” “May your village burn,” and “Shuafat is up in flames,” a reference to an East Jerusalem Palestinian neighbourhood. A Gantz-Eisenkot walk-out that would make Netanyahu even more dependent on Ben Gvir and Smotrich would increase pressure on Gallant, the defence minister, to follow suit and complicate Biden’s support for Israel.

“I know there are those in Israel who will not agree with this plan and will call for the war to continue indefinitely… Some are even in the government coalition. And they’ve made it clear: They want to occupy Gaza, they want to keep fighting for years, and the hostages are not a priority to them…. I’ve urged the leadership in Israel to stand behind this deal, despite whatever pressure comes,” Biden said as he put forward his proposed ceasefire deal that appears to be based on a draft endorsed by Netanyahu. In effect, Biden was cautioning Netanyahu not to allow for a situation in which he increases rather than reduces his dependency on Ben Gvir and Smotrich.

At the same time, Israeli analysts suggest that in Netanyahu’s mind, potential International Criminal Court (ICC) warrants for the arrest on war crime charges of the prime minister and Gallant is turning the continuation of the Gaza war into a liability rather than an asset that would ensure he remains in office.

The United States and 16 other countries whose citizens were taken hostage by Hamas on October 7 increased pressure on Netanyahu with the release of a joint statement calling on Israel and Hamas to conclude a ceasefire deal. Meanwhile, the United Nations Security Council, with Netanyahu potentially at a crossroads, appears to have delayed discussing a resolution that would endorse Biden’s ceasefire plan.

The United States initially circulated a draft resolution in support of the plan that was likely to be vetoed because it put the onus of acceptance on Hamas. That would be more difficult to do with an Israeli government void of most “adults in the room.”With the United States less vulnerable because of its stubborn support of Israel than many assume, Netanyahu may believe that he can use his Congressional speech to get away with whatever fallout a departure of Gantz and Eisenkot would have.

Netanyahu may be right that the United States feels less pressured to tighten the screws on Israel with deeds rather than words. To be sure, the US has lost moral standing because of perceived double standards in its approach towards the Ukraine and Gaza wars. US diplomats preaching human rights and the rule of law would likely be laughed out the door.

Nevertheless, Gulf states and various Asian nations still see the United States as the only security game in town. Moreover, support for Israel has barely cost the United States economically, except for food franchises like Starbucks which suffer from boycotts in several Middle Eastern countries.

The Biden administration, Israeli Defence Minister Yoav Gallant, and senior Israeli military commanders share Gantz’s frustration. Even so, countries like Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates prefer cooperating with the US over China on technology, including artificial intelligence. This has not stopped Gulf states from investing in Chinese technology.

The UAE’s G42 artificial intelligence holding company concluded a partnership with Microsoft in April after agreeing with the US Commerce Department’s Bureau of Industry and Security that it would pare back its presence in China or face potentially punitive sanctions.

Netanyahu’s problem is that Biden’s frustration with the Israeli prime minister and his ultra-nationalist and ultra-conservative partners has little to do with the cost of US support for Israel and potentially more with an emerging historic shift in what was once a “special relationship” between the United States and Israel. (IPA Service)