Quebec lawmakers press Air Canada chief exit

Quebec’s National Assembly has unanimously demanded the resignation of Air Canada chief executive Michael Rousseau, intensifying political pressure after his failure to speak French in a public message addressing a fatal aviation incident linked to LaGuardia Airport.

The 92–0 vote, adopted across party lines, marks a rare show of unity in Quebec politics and underscores the sensitivity of language rights in the province. Lawmakers argued that the airline’s leadership had fallen short of expectations for a company historically rooted in a bilingual national framework, particularly during a moment of crisis that drew widespread public attention.

The controversy stems from a video message issued by Rousseau following a deadly collision involving aircraft operations at LaGuardia. While the incident itself occurred in the United States, the airline’s response reverberated strongly in Quebec, where French language use remains a central political and cultural issue. Rousseau delivered his remarks solely in English, prompting criticism from political leaders and advocacy groups who viewed the omission as symbolic of a broader disconnect.

Quebec Premier François Legault’s government supported the motion, reflecting mounting frustration over perceived erosion of French in corporate and public life. Opposition parties, including the Parti Québécois and Québec solidaire, aligned with the governing Coalition Avenir Québec in backing the call, framing the issue as one of respect for Quebec’s linguistic identity rather than partisan politics.

Air Canada, headquartered in Montreal, has long been subject to federal obligations under the Official Languages Act, requiring it to provide services in both English and French. The airline has faced scrutiny over language compliance in the past, but the latest episode has reignited debate about enforcement and corporate accountability. Critics argue that leadership behaviour sets the tone for organisational culture, and that Rousseau’s communication failure raises questions about commitment at the highest level.

The company responded by reiterating its dedication to bilingual service and acknowledging the concerns raised in Quebec. It emphasised ongoing efforts to strengthen French-language use across operations, including customer service and internal communications. However, the statement stopped short of addressing the demand for Rousseau’s resignation directly, signalling a cautious approach amid escalating political pressure.

Industry analysts note that the dispute arrives at a delicate time for the aviation sector, which continues to navigate operational challenges, safety scrutiny, and reputational risks. The LaGuardia incident, while outside Canadian jurisdiction, has drawn attention to crisis communication practices among global carriers. Effective messaging in multiple languages is increasingly viewed as essential, particularly for airlines with diverse customer bases.

The broader implications extend beyond Air Canada. Quebec has intensified its efforts to protect and promote French through legislation such as Bill 96, which strengthens language requirements for businesses operating in the province. Corporate leaders are under growing expectation to demonstrate fluency or ensure that French is prominently represented in public communications. The National Assembly’s vote signals that language issues can quickly escalate into political flashpoints with tangible consequences for executives.

Rousseau himself has faced criticism on language matters before, having acknowledged limited proficiency in French despite leading one of the country’s most prominent companies. He has pledged to improve his skills, but the latest controversy has revived scrutiny of that commitment. Political leaders argue that symbolic gestures are insufficient when public trust is at stake, particularly during moments of tragedy.

For Air Canada, the challenge lies in balancing regulatory obligations, public expectations, and operational priorities. The airline remains a key player in North American aviation, with extensive domestic and international networks. Its reputation, however, is closely tied to its role as a national carrier, making issues of identity and inclusivity especially salient.