Security gaps reshape South African retail

South Africa’s retailers are paying a widening price for weak security systems, with losses now extending beyond stolen stock to staff safety, customer confidence, delivery costs, insurance premiums and already thin operating margins.

Shrinkage has become a boardroom issue rather than a store-level irritation. Retailers are dealing with shoplifting, employee theft, fraud, vandalism, armed robberies, cyber intrusions and organised syndicates that target goods with established resale value. The sector’s annual losses linked to crime and shrinkage are estimated at about R23 billion, a figure that underlines how security failure has become a direct threat to profitability.

The pressure is sharper because retail is operating in a constrained consumer economy. Sales volumes improved through parts of 2025, with full-year retail trade growth estimated at 3.7%, but the gains have not translated into easy margin expansion. Food retailers have used discounts to protect market share, clothing chains have faced intense competition, and online platforms have added delivery exposure to conventional store risks. Every stolen item now carries additional costs in replacement stock, investigation time, insurance claims, staff disruption and security upgrades.

Organised retail crime has changed the nature of the threat. Many incidents are no longer isolated acts of opportunistic theft. Retailers increasingly face repeat offenders, groups moving between stores, coordinated attacks on high-value categories and resale networks that turn stolen goods into cash quickly. Alcohol, tobacco, electronics, cosmetics, branded clothing, baby products and small appliances remain attractive because they are portable and easy to resell.

The rise of e-commerce has opened another front. South Africa’s online retail market is expected to exceed R130 billion in 2025, approaching 10% of total retail sales. That shift has expanded the number of vans, motorcycles and delivery vehicles moving valuable goods through urban routes. Delivery operators have reported daily hijackings of trucks and vans in the range of 20 to 25 incidents, forcing companies to pay for escorts, route monitoring, tracking technology and, in some cases, cash-in-transit-style protection for valuable parcels.

Energy instability has added a second layer of vulnerability. Although load shedding has eased significantly since 2024 and the grid recorded long stretches without supply interruptions, retailers still carry the cost of generators, solar systems, batteries, refrigeration backup and diesel. Security systems are also power-dependent. Cameras, alarm panels, access-control devices, electronic article surveillance gates and point-of-sale infrastructure can fail when power and connectivity are disrupted, creating windows for theft and fraud.

Large retailers have been better placed to absorb these costs, but smaller operators face a harsher calculation. A supermarket group can invest in analytics, centralised control rooms and integrated surveillance across hundreds of outlets. A township trader, independent pharmacy, family-run clothing shop or small grocery store may have to choose between extra staff, better cameras, backup power or stock replenishment. For many, theft is not an accounting adjustment; it can decide whether the business survives the month.

Shopping centres are also under pressure to treat security as part of the broader operating environment. High-footfall malls remain vulnerable to robberies, vehicle-related crime, card fraud, pickpocketing and coordinated store raids. Gauteng’s plan to increase law-enforcement visibility at major malls reflects the growing recognition that commercial security cannot be left solely to private guards and store managers.

Technology is becoming central to the response. Retailers are moving from passive cameras to networked surveillance, artificial intelligence-supported video analytics, automatic number plate recognition, incident databases, panic systems, remote monitoring and better integration between alarms and response teams. These tools can identify repeat offenders, detect unusual movement patterns and help staff respond faster. Yet technology can also create new risks when devices are poorly maintained, passwords are weak, firmware is outdated or systems are not monitored consistently.

Staff safety remains the most immediate concern. Retail workers are often the first people exposed to aggressive shoplifters, armed robbers or intoxicated customers. Security failures can lead to trauma, absenteeism, higher staff turnover and compensation claims. Retailers that treat shrinkage only as lost inventory risk missing the human cost of crime on shop-floor teams.