Just in:
VinEnergo partners with SunAsia Energy to develop Solar-on-Water projects integrated with aquaculture in the Philippines // ADNOC Drilling puts AI rig to work early // Rubio seeks Gulf backing for Iran accord // Valve’s pricier Steam Machine tests PC ambitions // GEMS enrolment softens as war delays relocations // Pulsar International (“Pulsar”) announces agreement as an authorized reseller of Amazon Leo to bring high-speed satellite internet to commercial maritime customers // Security Is the New Market Access: Kigen Is Leading the IoT Security Mandate // IMF warns Gulf flows need more time // Dubai summit sets global sports agenda // Collapse Of TMC In Bengal Has Given A Big Opportunity For A Left Turn-Around // Gaslight malware exposes AI triage blind spot // Emirates SkyCargo widens Asian freight reach // Europe and China Must Pivot from Tech Rivalry to “Constructive Engagement” in AI Era, Warn Leaders at CEIBS Forums // Global Residency by Investment: How Investors Are Choosing in 2026 // EVB Successfully Concludes Power2Drive Europe 2026 With Advanced EV Charging Solutions // Varenne Capital opens Dubai base for regional push // Foreign bank branch fined over compliance failures // From Millennium Xuan Paper to Contemporary Visual Storytelling: China’s Intangible Cultural Heritage Sets Off Again // HKRITA Signs MoU with Jeanologia and Looptworks to Establish the Green Machine Circular Textile Ecosystem, Marking a Breakthrough in Scalable Textile Recycling // Avalanche forms payments alliance with VanEck //

Centre tells SC it must be heard before any Agnipath decision

The Centre has filed a caveat in the Supreme Court urging that the court “must hear its side” before taking any decision on the petitions challenging the ‘Agnipath’ military recruitment scheme.

So far, three petitions have been filed in the Supreme Court against the ‘Agnipath’ scheme- the centre’s short-term recruitment plan for the armed forces. The caveat, however, does not mention any plea in particular.

Advocate Harsh Ajay Singh on Monday filed a petition in the Supreme Court seeking issuance of directions to the centre to reconsider its “Agnipath” recruitment scheme. The petition also mentioned that the announcement of the scheme has caused protests in several parts of the country.

ADVERTISEMENT

Earlier, two separate petitions were filed by lawyers ML Sharma and Vishal Tiwari respectively against the plan.

The petition filed by advocate ML Sharma had alleged that the government has quashed the century-old selection process for the armed forces which is contrary to the constitutional provisions and without having parliamentary approval.

Last week, advocate Vishal Tiwari in his petition urged the Supreme Court to set up a committee to examine the scheme and its impact on national security and Army. It also sought a direction from the top court to constitute a Special Investigation Team (SIT) to probe the large-scale violence against the scheme that led to the destruction of public property.

Protests broke out in several states after the centre unveiled the ‘Agnipath’ scheme on June 14. Under the scheme, people between 17.5 and 21 years will be recruited in armed forces for a four-year period, followed by compulsory retirement for most without gratuity and pension benefits.

Later, the government extended the upper age limit to 23 years for recruitment in 2022 in a bid to pacify the protesters.

With inputs from NDTV

The post Centre tells SC it must be heard before any Agnipath decision first appeared on IPA Newspack.



Notice an issue?

Arabian Post strives to deliver the most accurate and reliable information to its readers. If you believe you have identified an error or inconsistency in this article, please don't hesitate to contact our editorial team at editor[at]thearabianpost[dot]com. We are committed to promptly addressing any concerns and ensuring the highest level of journalistic integrity.


ADVERTISEMENT
Social Media Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com