Just in:
MENA Investment Banking Fees Slip Amid Equity Underwriting Lull // OPEC+ Eyes Pause in Production Rises After September Surge // Abu Dhabi’s Masdar and Iberdrola Back £5 Billion UK Offshore Wind Venture // Celebratory 911 Club Coupe Marks Half-Century Porsche Partnership // Tokyo Real Estate Set for $75 Million Blockchain Shake‑Up // Qingzhen’s Zhanjie Town Leverages Ecological Resources to Drive Industrial Upgrading and Integrate Culture and Tourism for Rural Revitalization // Entrepreneurs Turn to Harsh AI ‘Red Teamers’ to Stress‑Test Ideas // Meta pixel ruling marks watershed in EU data privacy // $1 Bn Pact to Launch Digital Real‑World Asset Platform // Results of the ixCrypto Index Series Quarterly Review (2025 Q2) & IX Digital Asset Industry Index Series Half Yearly Review (2025 1H) // CGTN: Beauty in diversity: How wisdom at Nishan Forum inspires global modernization // Galaxy AI Elevates On‑Device Intelligence with Privacy at Core // Sharjah Elevates Real‑Estate Platform with New Digital Portal // Stonepeak Secures Strategic Co-Control of IFCO Stake // Behomes Launches Behomes Hub – Cashback & Networking App for Real Estate Professionals // Musk Alleges Grok Was Misled and Predicts Tech Breakthroughs // TÜV SÜD Appoints Interim Leadership Following CEO Transition // Nigeria’s Coastal Highway Passes $747 m Funding Milestone // DNA‑Crafted Nanomachines Self‑Assemble in Water // Can India Emerge As The Trusted Leader Of Global South Like Earlier Years? //

Abu Dhabi Bid for Santos Sparks Energy Sovereignty Debate

Santos Ltd’s board of directors has endorsed a US $18.7 billion cash offer from an Abu Dhabi-led consortium, pledging immediate relief for stretched gas markets but plunging Australia into a high-stakes national interest conflict.

The bid, sponsored by ADNOC’s investment arm XRG alongside ADQ and Carlyle, offers A$8.89 per share—a 28 per cent premium to Santos’s market value—while assuming A$36.4 billion in enterprise debt. It marks the largest all‑cash takeover ever in Australia.

Investors have reacted with caution: Santos shares rallied nearly 11 per cent upon news of the bid but remain significantly below the offer price, reflecting deep concern over regulatory approval. Analysts warn that the deal’s fate now hinges on the Foreign Investment Review Board and Treasurer Jim Chalmers, whose approval will weigh economic gain against strategic control of critical energy infrastructure.

ADVERTISEMENT

Proponents emphasise that ADNOC’s financial strength can catalyse development of Santos’s undeveloped assets—including Narrabri and shale projects like Beetaloo—and help mitigate an anticipated east‑coast gas shortage by 2027. With ADNOC targeting 20–25 million tonnes per annum of LNG capacity by 2035, acquiring Santos’s stakes in Gladstone, Darwin and PNG LNG represents a strategic alignment for both parties.

However, a chorus of concern has emerged over the implications for domestic energy sovereignty. The high concentration of export‑oriented gas supply—over 70 per cent in Queensland—raises alarms that ADNOC might prioritise LNG sales over local consumption, deepening east‑coast supply pressures. RenewEconomy warns that “if ADNOC’s focus is primarily on LNG markets, it will likely seek to export as much gas as possible”.

Australian Energy Producers, which counts Santos CEO Kevin Gallagher as a board member, has yet to publicly weigh in, but the Australian Energy Market Operator has flagged potential domestic shortfalls by late decade if projects like Barossa and Narrabri are delayed.

Political figures are sharpening oversight. South Australia’s energy minister, Tom Koutsantonis, invoked state power to oversee licence transfers, while Treasurer Chalmers cautioned that the deal “would be a big decision” and pledged not to pre‑empt FIRB’s findings.

Historical precedents include the federal government blocking Shell’s bid for Woodside in 2001 and the NSW Ausgrid sale in 2016—illustrating a willingness to restrict foreign control of strategic infrastructure.

From Adelaide to Canberra, voices across politics and industry are watching keenly. South Australian Premier Peter Malinauskas stressed that the headquarters and local workforce must be retained; this position is reinforced by new state laws granting oversight over petroleum licence assignments.

On the investor side, divergent assessments persist. UBS analysts see ADNOC’s deep pockets as a positive, while others like Evans & Partners downgraded Santos stock, suggesting investors might prefer Woodside, citing superior oil market positioning.

The bid aligns with Australia‑UAE economic ties following a free trade agreement, yet regulatory scrutiny is expected to be heightened due to the sovereign‑state nature of ADNOC.

Approval would mark a milestone in Australia’s economic evolution, yet rejection—or imposition of conditions like domestic supply carve‑outs—could serve as a policy catalyst in securing energy infrastructure for public benefit.

This takeover bid places domestic energy security at the centre of policymaking, challenging Australia to find balance between foreign investment and safeguarding its energy future.


Notice an issue?

Arabian Post strives to deliver the most accurate and reliable information to its readers. If you believe you have identified an error or inconsistency in this article, please don't hesitate to contact our editorial team at editor[at]thearabianpost[dot]com. We are committed to promptly addressing any concerns and ensuring the highest level of journalistic integrity.


ADVERTISEMENT