In a landmark decision, over 140 nations have committed to mobilising $200 billion annually by 2030 to safeguard global biodiversity. This agreement, finalised at the United Nations COP16 summit in Rome, aims to halt and reverse environmental degradation worldwide.
The pact outlines a financial roadmap to support conservation efforts, particularly in developing countries. Key provisions include raising $20 billion annually by 2025, escalating to $30 billion by 2030, dedicated to biodiversity preservation in these regions. This initiative is part of the broader Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework, which aspires to protect 30% of the planet’s land and oceans and restore degraded ecosystems by the end of the decade.
A significant development from the summit is the establishment of the ‘Cali Fund,’ designed to channel voluntary contributions from industries that benefit from genetic resources, such as pharmaceuticals and agribusiness. Despite its launch, the fund has yet to secure firm financial commitments from corporations. Advanced discussions are reportedly underway with several companies, including some based in the United States, even though the U.S. is not a party to the agreement.
The allocation of the mobilised funds sparked extensive debate among delegates. Developing nations advocated for the creation of a new biodiversity fund to ensure equitable distribution, while wealthier countries preferred utilising existing financial mechanisms. This divergence underscores the ongoing tension between the Global North and South regarding financial responsibilities for biodiversity conservation.
The urgency of this financial mobilisation is underscored by alarming statistics: wildlife populations have plummeted by 73% since 1970, according to the World Wildlife Fund’s Living Planet Report 2024. This stark decline highlights the critical need for immediate and effective conservation measures.
While the agreement marks a significant step forward, some aspects remain unresolved. Notably, the decision to establish a dedicated global biodiversity fund has been deferred until 2028. In the interim, the focus will be on developing a comprehensive framework for conservation financing, aiming to bridge the estimated $700 billion annual funding gap necessary to achieve the framework’s ambitious targets.
The political landscape also influenced the negotiations. The United States, though not an official participant, has seen political shifts under President Trump that have impacted discussions, particularly concerning the nation’s role and responsibilities in global biodiversity funding. This situation has added complexity to the already intricate negotiations, reflecting broader geopolitical dynamics.
In addition to financial commitments, the Rome summit addressed mechanisms for monitoring and accountability. Delegates agreed on technical guidelines for tracking progress, including commitments to publish national biodiversity plans ahead of the next conference, COP17, scheduled to be held in Armenia. These measures aim to ensure transparency and facilitate the assessment of collective efforts toward the 2030 goals.
Despite the challenges, the agreement has been met with cautious optimism. Environmental groups acknowledge the progress made but stress the importance of translating financial pledges into tangible actions. Greenpeace, for instance, welcomed the financial design but emphasised the urgent need for these promises to materialise, particularly in providing direct access to funding for Indigenous peoples and local communities who play a pivotal role in biodiversity conservation.
____________________________________
This article first appeared on Greenlogue and is brought to you by Hyphen Digital Network
