News related to
lobbying

By Dr. Gyan Pathak BJP won the West Bengal election with the most recognizable face leading from the grassroots to the state level against Mamata led TMC is Suvendu Adhikari. He also defeated TMC supremo CM Mamata Banerjee from Bhabanipur Vidhan Sabha constituency. Naturally, he is seen as the most suitable candidate for Chief Minister […]

The article Selecting Chief Minister Of West Bengal Is A Delicate Task For BJP Leadership appeared first on Latest India news, analysis and reports on Newspack by India Press Agency).

Walsh, widely known in the industry as Willie Walsh, is currently director general of the International Air Transport Association and is due to take up the IndiGo role by August 3, 2026, after his IATA term ends on July 31, subject to regulatory and security clearances. Before leading IATA, he served as chief executive of British Airways and later of International Airlines Group, the parent company of British Airways, Iberia and other carriers. That background gives IndiGo a chief executive with experience spanning pilots’ operations, legacy airline restructuring, international expansion and trade-body advocacy.

The leadership change is significant because it follows a difficult period for IndiGo, whose rapid growth has also exposed strains in operations and staffing. Reuters reported that Elbers resigned after regulatory scrutiny linked to the airline’s handling of pilot rest and duty rules, following thousands of flight cancellations in December. Rahul Bhatia, IndiGo co-founder and managing director of promoter group InterGlobe Enterprises, had stepped in on an interim basis. Bringing in Walsh suggests the board wanted an external figure with global credibility and enough independence to steady operations while preserving the carrier’s long-term growth plans.

For IndiGo, the choice is also about scale. The airline holds roughly 65 per cent of the domestic market, according to Reuters, making it not merely a successful low-cost carrier but the central force in the country’s aviation market. That dominance has helped it build a strong cash-generating base at home, yet it also raises the pressure to prove it can translate domestic strength into a broader international network without letting reliability slip. Walsh arrives as the airline is trying to balance fleet growth, customer service, regulatory compliance and overseas ambition in a market where passengers are increasingly price-sensitive but also less tolerant of disruption.

His appointment may reassure investors and lessors who value experience at a time when the global airline industry is still dealing with supply-chain bottlenecks, aircraft delivery delays, engine issues and fluctuating fuel costs. At IATA, Walsh has spent the past several years commenting on exactly those pressures, from safety and profitability to cargo demand and trade shifts. That does not automatically make him an easy fit for IndiGo’s low-cost, execution-heavy culture, but it gives him a broad vantage point over how airlines are adapting to tighter margins and uneven global demand.

There is, however, another side to the appointment. Walsh’s career has been built largely in full-service and multi-brand international airline groups rather than in a pure low-cost model of the kind that made IndiGo successful. Critics may ask whether a leader shaped by European consolidation and global lobbying is the right match for a carrier whose reputation rests on fast turnarounds, tight cost control and consistent domestic execution. Supporters will counter that IndiGo is no longer a straightforward low-cost story. As its aircraft orders grow and its international reach deepens, the airline needs a chief executive who can negotiate complex regulation, manage global partnerships and command authority well beyond its home market.

Walsh’s own profile could become an asset as IndiGo tries to sharpen its identity from dominant domestic operator to more influential international player. He began his career as a cadet pilot at Aer Lingus in 1979 and later ran both Aer Lingus and British Airways before taking charge of IAG. That trajectory matters because IndiGo is moving into a stage where fleet strategy, global slots, bilateral rights and premium long-haul competition matter more than they did when the airline was focused chiefly on the home market. Boardrooms, regulators and suppliers all know Walsh, and that can give IndiGo added leverage as it pushes outward.

By T N Ashok NEW YORK: For seven decades, American diplomats danced around Kashmir with the precision of tightrope walkers, carefully avoiding any gesture that might suggest the United States had chosen sides in South Asia’s most intractable territorial dispute. Maps were scrubbed of political meaning. Statements were lawyered into studied neutrality. From Truman to […]

The article India Have Reasons To Be Happy At Big U.S. Switch On The Status Of Kashmir appeared first on Latest India news, analysis and reports on Newspack by India Press Agency).

By K Raveendran     When Google announced that Visakhapatnam would be home to its $15 billion project to build the company’s first artificial intelligence hub in India, the news landed like a thunderclap across the southern states. For Andhra Pradesh, it was nothing short of a jackpot — a once-in-a-generation opportunity to rewrite the […]

The article Google’s AI Hub: Visakhapatnam’s Jackpot, South India’s Heartburn appeared first on Latest India news, analysis and reports on Newspack by India Press Agency).

India has engaged with Washington over the U. S. decision to impose a one-time $100,000 fee on new H-1B visa applications, warning that the move threatens the mobility of skilled professionals and could strain bilateral trade ties.

The External Affairs Ministry affirmed it would continue talks with relevant stakeholders in the United States, emphasising that talent exchange has underpinned innovation and growth in both economies. The government noted that the new rule may disproportionately affect Indian nationals, since they constitute a significant share of the H-1B pool.

The White House announced that the fee will apply only to fresh petitions filed from September 21, 2025 onwards, not to renewals or existing visa holders. The administration framed this shift as part of efforts to prevent misuse of the visa system and prioritise higher-wage, high-skilled cases.

India’s reaction underscores deep concerns within its technology sector—many firms rely on U. S. operations staffed via H-1B sponsorship. Analysts estimate that the fee hike could reduce IT margins by 4–13 percent depending on visa intensity, while Indian IT stocks saw steep declines following the announcement.

At the same time, India is navigating friction on trade. U. S. tariffs levied on Indian goods—particularly a 50 percent cumulative duty tied to India’s oil imports from Russia—are already under scrutiny in bilateral talks. Officials assert that the visa and trade issues will be addressed as interconnected elements of the broader U. S.–India partnership.

During meetings on the sidelines of the U. N. General Assembly, India’s Foreign Minister and Commerce Minister held discussions with their U. S. counterparts, reinforcing that continued engagement is essential to manage tensions. The Indian side has also said that relevant domestic departments are evaluating options concerning the impact of the tariffs.

Despite the pushback, some U. S. industry figures support the new fee. Leaders at firms such as Nvidia, OpenAI and Netflix have welcomed the shift as a mechanism to prioritise high-value talent. Others, including JPMorgan’s CEO, have warned it risks driving skilled workers to competing nations. U. S. medical associations are lobbying for exemptions, arguing that the steep cost could impede physician recruitment, particularly in underserved areas.

India’s Finance Ministry has called for heightened monitoring of the economic fallout, citing possible impacts on remittance inflows and service exports. The ministry has described the short term as manageable but warned of long-term risks if the regime remains in place.

Within India’s tech industry, there has been a strategic pivot. Companies have invested over $1 billion in onshore training and hiring in the U. S., reducing dependence on H-1B deployment. Industry bodies argue that this shift could help absorb the shock should visa access tighten further.

Still, experts caution that such mitigation has limits. Smaller firms and startups that depend on cross-border talent mobility may feel the squeeze most acutely. Some analysts suggest that alternative destinations, including Canada, South Korea and the UK, may be more appealing to Indian professionals seeking global opportunities.

/India Press Agency/

By Nitya Chakraborty Prime Minister Narendra Modi has stepped into his 75th year on Wednesday, September 17.His birthday is being celebrated by the BJP nationally. The significance is much more as PM’s 75th birthday celebrations have coincided with the centenary programmes on the founding of the RSS in 1925.On October 2 this year, Vijaya Dasami […]

The article Decoding Prime Minister Narendra Modi As A Political Leader On His 75th Birthday appeared first on Latest India news, analysis and reports on IPA Newspack.

The U. S. House of Representatives has approved the GENIUS Act, the inaugural federal regulatory framework targeting fiat‑backed stablecoins, with a decisive 308–122 bipartisan vote on 17 July 2025. With Senate approval secured in June by a 68–30 margin, the legislation now advances to President Trump’s desk for signature, anticipated as early as tomorrow.

The GENIUS Act mandates that issuers—including banks, credit unions, fintech firms, and select non‑bank entities—maintain one‑to‑one reserves in cash or low‑risk assets such as U. S. Treasury bills, with mandatory monthly public disclosures of reserve composition. It also institutes anti‑money laundering controls, requires issuance organisations to obtain licences from federal or state financial regulators, and prohibits paying interest directly to stablecoin holders.

The legislation forms part of a broader “Crypto Week” effort in the House, which also included passage of the CLARITY Act—allocating oversight of digital asset classification between the SEC and CFTC—and the Anti‑CBDC Surveillance State Act, barring the Federal Reserve from issuing a central bank digital currency. Both now await Senate consideration.

Advocates argue that the GENIUS Act addresses long-standing regulatory uncertainty, providing market stability and consumer safeguards within a $260 billion-plus stablecoin ecosystem. Senior figures from institutions such as JPMorgan Chase, Bank of America, Citi, Walmart, and Amazon have reportedly expressed interest in issuing stablecoins under the new regime. Market sentiment reflects optimism: crypto‑linked equities and assets rose when the House vote was finalised, with Bitcoin nearing record highs above $119,000.

Nonetheless, critics highlight significant concerns. Consumer advocates emphasise that stablecoins remain outside FDIC protection and could pose redemption risks or obscure hidden fees. Others express unease over potential weak guardrails: the SEC’s Paul Atkins cautioned that regulatory innovation must still ensure sufficient market safeguards.

Ethics debates spotlight former President Trump’s extensive ties to the crypto industry, including investments in World Liberty Financial and a meme coin touted as generating over $300 million in related revenues. Opponents claim this raises conflict‑of‑interest questions and risks favouring Trump‑linked enterprises, though the White House has asserted asset segregation via a family trust.

In Congress, both Democratic and Republican proponents defended the legislation for delivering much‑needed structure. Democratic Rep. Josh Gottheimer remarked that introducing “some rules of the road” was preferable to having none. Opposing voices like Rep. Maxine Waters cautioned that the law might “signal tolerance for corruption” without closing presidential exemptions from conflict‑of‑interest prohibitions. Meanwhile, Senate Democrats, including Richard Blumenthal, criticised the bill’s failure to eliminate loopholes or demand stronger consumer protection standards.

Beyond federal oversight, the GENIUS Act introduces a layered supervisory model: federal agencies will regulate larger issuers and interstate entities, while state regulators handle smaller players—those issuing under $10 billion annually. The legislation sets out implementation timelines, including one‑year deadlines for rule‑making and an 18‑month effective date, with a three‑year transition period before enforcement on custody and transaction restrictions.

Industry stakeholders anticipate dramatic market growth. Scott Bessent, Treasury secretary, projected the stablecoin market could swell from around $195 billion to over $2 trillion following the GENIUS Act’s implementation. Christian Catalini of the MIT Cryptoeconomics Lab predicted fierce competition as banks and fintechs join traditional issuers with consumer trust bolstered by regulation.

The crypto sector, stung by past regulatory setbacks under the prior administration’s enforcement actions, now views the GENIUS Act as a turning point. Major players like Circle and Coinbase backed the measure after directing substantial lobbying resources toward lawmakers. Jennifer Nolan, head of the Blockchain Association, described it as a “defining moment in the evolution of U. S. digital asset policy”.

With presidential signature expected imminently, the GENIUS Act is poised to redefine the U. S. approach to stablecoins—ushering in regulated issuance, enhanced transparency, and heightened institutional involvement. Its progress also spotlights ongoing debates about market oversight, political influence, and financial stability in an increasingly digital economy.

Coinbase, headquartered in the United States, has secured a place among Time Magazine’s 100 Most Influential Companies of 2025, hailed for reshaping the landscape of digital finance and regulatory engagement. This accolade reflects a marked shift in how cryptocurrency firms are perceived by mainstream institutions.

With over 108 million users and more than $400 billion in custodial assets, Coinbase stands as the largest US-based crypto exchange. Analysts attribute significant weight to its aggressive advocacy efforts in Washington DC and its proactive approach to regulatory compliance, positioning the company as a key policy driver for the digital asset space.

Coinbase’s stock has mirrored its growing stature—rising approximately 42 per cent year-to-date and briefly touching $382 per share following the US Senate’s passage of the GENIUS stablecoin bill on 17 June. Market watchers note that its inclusion in the S&P 500 in May reinforces its transition from niche crypto exchange to mainstream financial institution. That move not only provides visibility to traditional investors but also signals regulatory confidence.

The cardinals of Coinbase’s ascent include its push for firm regulatory frameworks: it recently secured a MiCA license from Luxembourg’s Commission de Surveillance du Secteur Financier, enabling full European market operations. Plans are underway to establish its EU headquarters in Luxembourg, marking a strategic foothold in the continent.

Another bold initiative is Coinbase’s application to the US Securities and Exchange Commission to launch tokenised stock trading. If approved, this service could see the platform rival fintech peers such as Robinhood and Webull, offering fractionalised equity products under one roof.

Financially, Coinbase reported over $2 billion in trailing annual revenue and maintained $420 billion in assets under custody as of Q1 2025, up from $310 billion the preceding year. These figures, alongside institutional-tailored offerings such as Coinbase Prime, have caught the attention of Bernstein analysts, who raised their COIN price target by 50 per cent in light of this recognition.

Despite its successes, Coinbase’s journey has not been without hurdles. A May cyber-extortion attempt linked to stolen customer data resulted in an estimated cost of up to $400 million, though the company managed to contain the breach and refused to submit to ransom demands. This incident followed growing scrutiny from blockchain investigators concerning vulnerabilities and scam-related losses attributed to the platform. Still, the US SEC dismissed its enforcement action in February 2025, signalling regulatory progress.

Beyond its core operations, Coinbase wields significant influence in shaping public policy. Its 2024 lobbying campaign played a central role in positioning cryptocurrency as a campaign issue in the US election cycle. Time again underscored its impact, quoting: “Coinbase led a massive lobbying campaign … helping cement crypto as a voting issue,” and framing the company as “a key driver of the industry’s policy efforts in Washington D.C.”.

Looking ahead, industry observers anticipate further advances as Coinbase expands tokenised equity offerings and solidifies its role in institutional-grade products. These efforts, coupled with sustained lobbying presence and international expansion, point to a future where digital assets underpin new investment paradigms.

The U.S. Senate has enacted the GENIUS Act, the first-ever federal framework for regulating dollar‑pegged stablecoins, with a decisive 68–30 bipartisan vote on 17 June 2025. Eighteen Democrats joined Republicans in supporting the legislation, which now advances to the House and is expected to reshape Washington’s digital asset rules.

The bill mandates that stablecoin issuers back tokens with liquid assets such as U.S. Treasuries, require regular financial disclosures and adhere to anti‑money‑laundering measures. It grants banks the authority to issue stablecoins, while explicitly restricting executive branch officials and legislators from sharing in their profits—a direct response to concerns over conflicts of interest.

A surge in crypto-sector investment in political campaigns appears to have shifted momentum. Industry spending topped $119 million in support of pro‑crypto congressional candidates during the 2024 cycle. Lobbyists then intensified efforts to engage Democratic lawmakers, viewed as essential for reaching the 60-vote threshold in the evenly divided Senate.

Internal communications among Democratic operatives reveal strategic alignment with crypto backers. In a private group chat described in reporting by the Lever, coalition members acknowledged that, despite ethical concerns, opposing the industry would be “political suicide.” One member reportedly observed that any amendment targeting Trump‑family conflicts would be “DOA,” suggesting token amendments offered for optics rather than impact.

Legislators including Senator Elizabeth Warren have voiced misgivings, arguing that the bill inadequately shields consumers or addresses risks associated with big‑tech or foreign‑issued stablecoins. She contends it grants too much leeway to the likes of former President Donald Trump’s crypto ventures, such as the Trump memecoin and World Liberty Financial.

The crypto lobby’s efforts have extended beyond campaign funding to retention of influential political operatives. Coinbase, for instance, recently appointed veteran Democratic strategist David Plouffe to its advisory board, joining a roster of insiders from both parties. Observers note this reflects crypto’s emerging status as a “politically competitive” constituency.

The political dynamic has shifted decisively. As AP reports, Democrats are balancing distrust of Trump-linked crypto enterprises with newfound recognition of the sector’s electoral influence. Backing the GENIUS Act became for many a strategic necessity, notwithstanding deep ideological resistance to deregulation.

The Senate vote occurred amid broader legislative discussions. The CLARITY Act—aimed at clarifying agency jurisdiction across the SEC and CFTC—is under consideration in the House Financial Services Committee. Some lawmakers propose merging the stablecoin and authority-defining bills, though others caution it could delay the GENIUS Act’s passage.

Crypto industry leaders view the GENIUS Act as a critical precursor to more comprehensive legislation. Ledger’s Head of Global Policy, Seth Hertline, described the Senate’s action as “a political bellwether” for the sector’s broader legislative agenda.

The bill’s passage also intersects with Trump’s personal crypto interests. His family’s stablecoin projects have sparked accusations of profiteering and lobbying for relaxed oversight. Critics warn that current legislative safeguards fall short of preventing conflicts of interest.

The next phase lies in the House, where Republican leadership must reconcile the Senate’s GENIUS Act with its own STABLE Act or integrate it into broader regulatory plans. Some Republicans advocate adding provisions to limit central bank digital currency initiatives, though such measures may complicate Senate approval.

Major stablecoin issuers such as Tether and Circle —together controlling over $200 billion in supply—stand to gain regulatory clarity and legitimacy if the GENIUS Act becomes law. Recent moves by major corporates, including JPMorgan’s planned stablecoin on Coinbase’s Base chain and indications that Amazon and Walmart are exploring token issuance, signal growing private‑sector enthusiasm.

As the House deliberates, questions remain whether the Senate’s bipartisan vote marks the start of a fully fleshed-out U.S. crypto regulatory regime—or the culmination of a high-stakes battle between policy integrity and political pragmatism.

Major corporations Walmart and Amazon are understood to be mulling the launch of their own stablecoins as part of a broader trend among retailers and tech companies seeking to streamline payment systems and reduce transaction costs. With the U.S. Congress advancing the GENIUS Act—legislation to regulate stablecoin issuance—the moment now appears opportune for these private-sector experiments.

Both Walmart and Amazon are reportedly evaluating the regulatory environment and potential use cases for proprietary stablecoins. Sources suggest these could be integrated with payment platforms, loyalty schemes and digital marketplaces. Such a move would allow these companies to bypass conventional card rails and intermediaries that currently levy high fees on merchants and slow settlement times.

Walmart’s ongoing fintech ambitions align with the exploration of stablecoin applications. The retailer has already lobbied for regulatory changes aimed at bringing greater competition into credit card networks, indicating a broader shift towards alternative payment mechanisms. Amazon, though in the preliminary assessment stage, is also understood to be considering whether a branded stablecoin might enhance the convenience of online transactions.

The GENIUS Act currently under Senate review is central to this evolution. It delineates a framework for “permitted payment stablecoin issuers” and mandates reserve requirements, redemption rules and federal oversight. While enabling banks, non-banks and subsidiaries to issue stablecoins, it permits notable flexibility across different sectors.

Critics are already voicing concerns. Legislators such as Senator Elizabeth Warren and Rep. Maxine Waters caution against allowing large non-financial firms to enter the payments landscape, fearing an erosion of banking safeguards and potential intensified corporate dominance. Academic voices, including law professor Hilary Allen, warn that Big Tech’s entry into finance could “entrench corporate power” and compromise consumer data privacy.

A key sticking point lies in a proposed amendment to prohibit non-financial corporations from issuing stablecoins unless they meet stringent criteria around financial stability, data protection and consumer welfare. This amendment would cover tech behemoths like Amazon, Meta and Apple. In contrast, proponents argue that allowing these companies in could foster innovation and enhance market competition.

Merchant industries are lobbying hard for clarity. The Merchants Payments Coalition argues that a stablecoin framework could disrupt the dominance of established payment networks and deliver substantial cost savings. Stakeholders have highlighted how cross-border payments could benefit from low-cost, near-instant settlement, echoing the broader fintech industry’s embrace of stablecoins as programmable rails for digital commerce.

Opposition remains robust, however. Critics warn that unbridled stablecoin issuance by non-financial corporations could introduce systemic risks. The GENIUS Act’s provisions are aimed at managing these risks through requirements for reserves, transparency, anti-money laundering compliance and state-federal coordination. Still, there is unease that enforcement mechanisms may not sufficiently address deep-seated concerns over financial stability and consumer safety.

Proponents believe stablecoins could transform how commerce operates, by speeding up settlements, reducing fees and enabling more fluid integration across digital platforms. With adoption driven by both large merchants and smaller enterprises, the innovation rather than consolidation of money systems could mark a significant shift.

Walmart and Amazon appear poised to test these boundaries. As the GENIUS Act moves closer to a Senate floor vote, the exact role that private-sector stablecoins will play remains uncertain. The decision by Congress to permit non-bank issuers is a strategic pivot, opening regulatory pathways that could redefine how money flows through the global payments ecosystem.