Just in:
Universal Language for Healthcare: General Authority Embraces Global Coding System // AIA Hong Kong Wins More Than 20 Accolades at MPF Ratings MPF Awards, BENCHMARK MPF of The Year Awards and Bloomberg Businessweek Top Fund Awards // Arvind Kejriwal Gets International Heft Against The Deshi Vishwaguru // Court Sides with Coinbase on Wallet Service, But Staking Program Remains in Limbo // Samsung Partners National Heritage Board to Bring a Slice of Singapore’s Cultural Heritage to Samsung The Frame TV // U.S. Compliance Takes Center Stage at OKX Following Industry Jitters // Emirati Aid Reaches Ukraine as Food Shortages Bite // Sunshine’s Debut Features Leave Tech World Scratching Its Head // Hope for Respite as UAE Endorses UN Plea for Gaza Truce // No running of govt from jail, says Delhi Lt Governor // Party Nominees Refusing To Contest: Major Perception Threat For BJP // Experts come together to support updating the city’s nature conservation masterplan // Global Audience to Witness Thrill of Dubai World Cup // Meta Earth Official Website Launch: The Pioneer Explorer in the Modular Public Blockchain Domain // Lisboeta Macau’s world first LINE FRIENDS PRESENTS CASA DE AMIGO and BROWN & FRIENDS CAFE & BISTRO has officially opened // US reiterates concern over Kejriwal arrest, Cong accounts // Andertoons by Mark Anderson for Thu, 28 Mar 2024 // Experience Ultimate Shopping Freedom at 4.4 Shopee Spree: Don’t Worry, Shop Shopee! // Renewables Surge Sets Record, But Global Equity Lags // Emirates Post Speeds Up Deliveries for GCC with Special Day //
HomeIndia TakesBuzzFeed drops a Trump bombshell, irresponsibly

BuzzFeed drops a Trump bombshell, irresponsibly

Trump

As CNN reported on a private intelligence report claiming that Russia has dirt on President-elect Donald Trump Tuesday night, BuzzFeed published the basis of the report, a 35-page dossier, online.

Both CNN and BuzzFeed pointed out that the documents have been circulating since at least October and that its claims are unverified.

ADVERTISEMENT

BuzzFeed Editor-in-Chief Ben Smith explained his choice to publish the dossier in a memo to the newsroom Tuesday, arguing the decision reflects “the job of reporters in 2017.”

That’s certainly what Wikileaks does. But publishing an entirely unvetted document is a significant departure from the way editors of most significant publications would define the role of reporting.

Sure, editors everywhere get queasy when they consider withholding information from the public. But historically, when editors have wrestled with this challenge, they agonized over information reporters had already vetted.

Here are some sentences I wish Smith had included in his note:

“Here’s what we are doing to verify or debunk the claims…”

“Here’s a list of the people that helped us identify the harm we might cause in publishing this…”

“Here are the most important facts we’ve already independently verified…”

At least one other organization took the opposite approach. The Lawfare Blog said it was in possession of the documents but opted not to publish them because their allegations were unproven.

“First, we have no idea if any of these allegations are true,” wrote Lawfare staffers Quinta Jurecic, Susan Hennessey and Benjamin Wittes. “Yes, they are explosive; they are also entirely unsubstantiated, at least to our knowledge, at this stage. For this reason, even now, we are not going to discuss the specific allegations within the document.”

Other news organizations, such as The New York Times and The Daily Beast, described the allegations without publishing the document in full. Times Executive Editor Dean Baquet defended that decision, saying that the newspaper is “not in the business of publishing things we can’t stand by.”

Critics will probably say that BuzzFeed’s decision to publish the document had more to do with asserting its own relevance than it did with public-spirited reporting. And BuzzFeed’s retort would likely be that the public deserves to see a report that hundreds of political insiders are talking about.

But the act of publishing the dossier in its entirety isn’t journalism. Vetting the document and determining its veracity? That’s the work of journalists in 2017, or any other year.

(via Poynter)

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT
Just in:
Konica Minolta is named ASEAN 2023 Market Leader in Colour Light and Mid Digital Production Printers // Renewables Surge Sets Record, But Global Equity Lags // Emirati Aid Reaches Ukraine as Food Shortages Bite // In Lok Sabha Polls In Punjab, AAP Is Advantageously Placed As Against Its Three Rivals // Court Sides with Coinbase on Wallet Service, But Staking Program Remains in Limbo // Experience Ultimate Shopping Freedom at 4.4 Shopee Spree: Don’t Worry, Shop Shopee! // Party Nominees Refusing To Contest: Major Perception Threat For BJP // US reiterates concern over Kejriwal arrest, Cong accounts // AI Boost for Galaxy Devices: Samsung Expands One UI 6.1 Update // AIA Hong Kong Wins More Than 20 Accolades at MPF Ratings MPF Awards, BENCHMARK MPF of The Year Awards and Bloomberg Businessweek Top Fund Awards // Experts come together to support updating the city’s nature conservation masterplan // Andertoons by Mark Anderson for Thu, 28 Mar 2024 // Superland Announced Annual Results for 2023, 2023 Net Profit Increased approximately 39.5% to approximately HK$22.2 million as Compared to the 2022 Adjusted One // German Job Market Resilience Bodes Well for Economic Recovery // Sharpening the Focus: Sharjah Health Department Refines Evaluation Criteria for “Healthy Schools Programme” // No running of govt from jail, says Delhi Lt Governor // Meta Earth Official Website Launch: The Pioneer Explorer in the Modular Public Blockchain Domain // Ingdan Announces 2023 Annual Results // Samsung Partners National Heritage Board to Bring a Slice of Singapore’s Cultural Heritage to Samsung The Frame TV // Arvind Kejriwal Was Used By BJP In 2011 Movement To Take On The Congress //