Shares of Nissan Motor Co. dropped sharply following the firm’s decision to increase its convertible bond issuance to ¥200 billion, up from the initially announced ¥150 billion. The company cited strong investor demand during the book-building process as justification for the upsized deal, though market reaction suggests heightened concerns over shareholder dilution.
This convertible debt forms a key part of Nissan’s broader funding strategy, which includes a planned $4 billion issuance of senior unsecured bonds in U. S. dollars and euros. These initiatives aim to strengthen Nissan’s cash position in response to deteriorating profitability and looming debt maturities.
Nissan reported a net loss of $4.5 billion for the fiscal year ending March and faces approximately ¥700 billion in debt coming due before March 2026. All three major credit-rating agencies have downgraded the company’s debt to “junk”, and measures such as asking suppliers to defer payments underscore the desperation of its liquidity management.
The new convertible bonds, maturing in 2031, will convert into equity and are earmarked to fund investments in electric vehicle development and software-defined vehicle technologies. Meanwhile, proceeds from the senior unsecured bonds will go towards refinancing existing debt, with projected coupons ranging from mid-7 percent to low-8 percent, reflecting a higher risk premium.
Market sentiment has turned uneasy: Nissan’s credit default swap costs on five-year debt are at their highest in over fifteen years—the most expensive among Japanese corporates. The company’s stock has slumped roughly 11 percent in two trading days, closing at ¥315.5 on Tuesday after sliding 6.4 percent, following a 4.9 percent fall the previous day.
Analysts note that although Nissan’s low leverage and net cash position were cited by Fitch as stabilising factors, the broader debt mountain and weak cash flow have overshadowed these positives. The issuance of both convertible and high-yield debt reflects a balancing act between dilutive financing and costly borrowing.
Under CEO Ivan Espinosa, who took the helm in April, Nissan has launched a restructuring plan including plant closures, workforce reductions, and a renewed emphasis on EVs and electrification. However, the need for substantial external financing emphasises the scale of the company’s financial challenges.
The enlarged convertible bond offering signals investor confidence in Nissan’s repositioning, yet also highlights the trade‑offs involved: while it provides critical funding for future growth, it dilutes shareholder value, triggering market unease. The accompanying high-rate bond issuance underscores that capital markets demand a premium when lending to Nissan.
Looking ahead, the success of these funding measures hinges on Nissan’s ability to stabilise operations, align its product portfolio with evolving market demands, and manage its refinancing schedule into fiscal 2026. With substantial maturity walls approaching, any failure to execute could compound its financial stress.
