Anyone wishing to see just how shocking the behaviour of our
“child protection” system can be should watch an utterly chilling video on
YouTube (see below: “Kidnap of children from their mother by Dutch social
services…”). It shows 11-year-old twins screaming in protest as they are
seized by social workers and carried off by a mob of policemen, from the
loving home they have now not seen for nearly three years.
Although they belong to a Russian-Latvian family resident for years in
Holland, it is a scene re-enacted every day in Britain, thanks to a system
that the Dutch children’s minister said in 2009 should be an “inspiration”
to social workers in his own country. Having reported on this awful story
more than once before, I now write about it again because this very day, in
the town of Nijmegen, those children will be rushing joyfully into the arms
of their mother and their brother Ilja Antonovs (who shot the film) –
because last week, a judge ruled that the children should never have been
removed in the first place.
I have followed this case because, in so many ways, it mirrors what is being
done on an unprecedented scale to so many families in Britain – except that
here it is usually not possible to report on them in anything like such
graphic detail. This is due to the suffocating secrecy surrounding what our
social workers and family courts get up to. As so often in Britain, the
Dutch case involves the system colluding with a dysfunctional and absent
father to remove children from their family on quite ludicrous grounds, the
chief of them being merely that, when at home, the children spoke Russian,
not Dutch.
Since March 2012, their mother and Ilja, now 26, have fought an extraordinary
battle through the courts, with the aid of two capable and committed
lawyers, to get the twins freed from the “living facility” where they were
placed by the social workers, at a yearly cost to Dutch taxpayers of €80,000
(£60,000) for each child. Twice the Dutch court of appeal ruled that the
children, who were utterly miserable, deprived of their phones, forbidden to
watch television or read newspapers, and generally mistreated, should be
returned home – only on each occasion for this to be overturned by a judge
in a lower, family court. The case has attracted considerable publicity in
Russia and Latvia, and even, after it was reported here, in leading Dutch
newspapers.
Finally, one judge asked for an assessment of all the family by an independent
psychologist. She could not have produced a more favourable report, or been
more coruscating about the conduct of the social workers. She was
particularly contemptuous of their absurd claim that the only reason for
holding the children so long was the mother’s failure to “co-operate with
professionals”, an excuse only too familiar here in Britain.
The children, the psychologist found, had been traumatised by the whole
experience, as by the quite unnecessary placing of the girl in a “special
needs” school, and they should be freed to return home immediately. Last
Monday, the judge agreed, and today the family will be reunited.
The real hero of this story is Ilja, who has twice had to miss his place at St
Andrews University because of his need to fight for his family, for
humanity, for justice and for truth. His tireless efforts to get publicity
for his family’s plight on one occasion landed him in prison, on another
forced him to flee abroad. I only hope St Andrews will now recognise what an
impressive young man he is, as at long last, he hopes to take up his
promised place there.
[embedded content]
This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service – if this is your content and you’re reading it on someone else’s site, please read the FAQ at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php#publishers.
(via Telegraph)
