Just in:
Sharjah Chamber Breaks Ground on Final Expansion with New HQ Pact // Global Audience to Witness Thrill of Dubai World Cup // Universal Language for Healthcare: General Authority Embraces Global Coding System // Andertoons by Mark Anderson for Thu, 28 Mar 2024 // Emirati Aid Reaches Ukraine as Food Shortages Bite // Experience Ultimate Shopping Freedom at 4.4 Shopee Spree: Don’t Worry, Shop Shopee! // Superland Announced Annual Results for 2023, 2023 Net Profit Increased approximately 39.5% to approximately HK$22.2 million as Compared to the 2022 Adjusted One // Emirates Post Speeds Up Deliveries for GCC with Special Day // First-Ever Fortune Innovation Forum Draws Top Global Leaders to Hong Kong, Promoting Agendas On Collective Cross-Sector Advancement // U.S. Compliance Takes Center Stage at OKX Following Industry Jitters // Samsung Partners National Heritage Board to Bring a Slice of Singapore’s Cultural Heritage to Samsung The Frame TV // AI Boost for Galaxy Devices: Samsung Expands One UI 6.1 Update // Ingdan Announces 2023 Annual Results // Lisboeta Macau’s world first LINE FRIENDS PRESENTS CASA DE AMIGO and BROWN & FRIENDS CAFE & BISTRO has officially opened // Arvind Kejriwal Was Used By BJP In 2011 Movement To Take On The Congress // US reiterates concern over Kejriwal arrest, Cong accounts // Infineon and HD Korea Shipbuilding & Offshore Engineering jointly develop ship electrification technology // Sunshine’s Debut Features Leave Tech World Scratching Its Head // Sharpening the Focus: Sharjah Health Department Refines Evaluation Criteria for “Healthy Schools Programme” // No running of govt from jail, says Delhi Lt Governor //
HomeInvestingUS Government Can Legally Access Your Facebook Data (And Now We Know How)

US Government Can Legally Access Your Facebook Data (And Now We Know How)

Submitted by Alice Salles via TheAntiMedia.org,

The end of the year is approaching, and data concerning government abuses of power has begun pouring in.

ADVERTISEMENT

According to Facebook’s Global Government Requests Report, government’s requests for Facebook account data rose 27 percent in the first half of 2016.

Facebook’s official announcement explained that requests for user data went from 46,710 in the last half of 2015 to 59,229 in the first half of 2016. At least 56 percent of these requests, Facebook added, “contained a non-disclosure order that prohibited us from notifying the user.

Law enforcement agencies from across the globe, Facebook continued, often send restriction requests demanding Facebook remove content from its forums. Fortunately, these requests dropped substantially this year, from 55,827 in the last half of 2015 to 9,663 in 2016 — an 87 percent drop. Most of the 2015 requests revolved aroundFrench content restrictions of a single image from the November 13, 2015 terrorist attacks.”

Additionally, Facebook used its report to disclose for the first time what the company does when law enforcement agencies request “snapshots” of a user account that might be relevant to law enforcement for undisclosed reasons.

These “preservation requests,” as they are known, are requests to “preserve data pending receipt of formal legal process.” They are often processed by the social media website as snapshots, which are preserved temporarily. According to Facebook, the company does notdisclose any of the preserved records unless and until we receive formal and valid legal process.” In the first half of 2016, Facebook received 38,675 preservation requests regarding 67,129 accounts, a staggering number of requests.

Further, Facebook insisted it does not give law enforcement any “back doors” to user information. Adding that requests are only fulfilled if they meet legal requirements or “legal sufficiency,” as Facebook puts it, they claim to “apply a rigorous approach to every government request [they] receive to protect the information of the people who use [their] services,” the company added. But this rigorous approach is not rigorous enough if “reforms” designed to avoid privacy overreach in America simply don’t go far enough.

Take the USA Freedom Act, for instance. The 2015 law was once supported by libertarian-leaning congressmen like Rep. Justin Amash (R-MI). Later, however, Amash criticized the bill after changes giving government more power were adopted.

Mentioning the new rule by name, Facebook added that “as a result of transparency reforms introduced this year by the USA Freedom Act, our report also contains additional information concerning National Security Letters (NSLs).” NSLs are “extraordinary search procedures” that give the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) the power to “compel the disclosure of customer records held by banks, telephone companies, Internet Service Providers, and others.” They are extraordinary because detailed information can be surrendered without proper oversight, an issue that has led to countless cases of abuse.

While NSLs are still being implemented, the gag order related to the procedure has changed. Now, “the government goes to court to justify the gag order only if an NSL recipient notifies the FBI of its desire for judicial review in the first place.” While the government bears “the burden of immediately going to court and proving its necessity,” NSLs give the FBI the power to bypass this important step.

Explaining that “the government lifted a gag requirement on one NSL issued in the second half of 2015,” the company decided to publish it. It’s unclear sure how many other NSLs Facebook has received.

Facebook may promise to “apply a rigorous approach to every government request” that comes its way, but rigor may only be practiced within the boundaries of U.S. law. If the law fails to protect the user’s privacy by allowing agencies to use “extraordinary” procedures, your data is never protected, no matter how well-meaning companies like Facebook claim to be.

According to Facebook, other government requests concerning “imminent risk of serious injury or death” are also granted on a regular basis. At least 3,016 of these requests were made in the first half of 2016. They targeted 4,192 accounts.

Search warrants were produced in only 13,742 cases of request for data while only 781 others were backed by court orders.


Source link

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT
Just in:
Experience Ultimate Shopping Freedom at 4.4 Shopee Spree: Don’t Worry, Shop Shopee! // Global Audience to Witness Thrill of Dubai World Cup // TUMI Hosts Global Launch Event in Singapore to Unveil Women’s Asra Collection and Announce Global Ambassador, Mun Ka Young // U.S. Compliance Takes Center Stage at OKX Following Industry Jitters // AIA Hong Kong Wins More Than 20 Accolades at MPF Ratings MPF Awards, BENCHMARK MPF of The Year Awards and Bloomberg Businessweek Top Fund Awards // Sunshine’s Debut Features Leave Tech World Scratching Its Head // Arvind Kejriwal Was Used By BJP In 2011 Movement To Take On The Congress // Andertoons by Mark Anderson for Thu, 28 Mar 2024 // 2024 Lok Sabha Elections Will Be The Costliest One Till Now In The Whole World // No running of govt from jail, says Delhi Lt Governor // Konica Minolta is named ASEAN 2023 Market Leader in Colour Light and Mid Digital Production Printers // Emirati Aid Reaches Ukraine as Food Shortages Bite // Meta Earth Official Website Launch: The Pioneer Explorer in the Modular Public Blockchain Domain // Superland Announced Annual Results for 2023, 2023 Net Profit Increased approximately 39.5% to approximately HK$22.2 million as Compared to the 2022 Adjusted One // Hope for Respite as UAE Endorses UN Plea for Gaza Truce // Infineon and HD Korea Shipbuilding & Offshore Engineering jointly develop ship electrification technology // Sharpening the Focus: Sharjah Health Department Refines Evaluation Criteria for “Healthy Schools Programme” // Universal Language for Healthcare: General Authority Embraces Global Coding System // German Job Market Resilience Bodes Well for Economic Recovery // Ingdan Announces 2023 Annual Results //