The decision comes after the senior IPS officer completed three months under suspension following disciplinary action initiated in July. The extension keeps him away from official duties while proceedings concerning the alleged manipulation of police investigation records remain unresolved.
Ajith Kumar was suspended on July 24 after a Special Investigation Team found evidence suggesting that he had attempted to influence investigators handling an assault case involving security personnel attached to former chief minister Pinarayi Vijayan.
The allegations concern an incident at Alappuzha on December 15, 2023, when Kerala Students Union and Youth Congress activists protesting against the Nava Kerala Sadas programme were allegedly assaulted by members of the then chief minister’s security contingent.
Vijayan had described the intervention by security personnel as a rescue operation, a characterisation that subsequently became central to the political controversy surrounding the incident.
The government’s latest decision prolongs disciplinary restrictions on Ajith Kumar, who previously served as the state’s Additional Director General of Police responsible for law and order.
The suspension order issued in July accused the officer of misusing his supervisory authority to influence subordinate officers and protect personnel implicated in the assault investigation.
The Special Investigation Team examined allegations that investigators had been pressured to alter case records, suppress material evidence and prepare a report that could facilitate the closure of proceedings against the accused security personnel.
Statements recorded from police officers involved in the original investigation formed an important part of the findings.Inspector K P Tomson and Deputy Superintendents of Police Arun K S and Sunil Raj were among the officers whose statements were examined during the investigation.
The suspension order maintained that the accounts of investigating officers indicated pressure from senior officials to weaken the case against the security personnel.
Investigators also examined allegations that officials attached to Ajith Kumar’s office participated in efforts to influence the investigation.
Ajith Kumar denied wrongdoing when the allegations were referred to him for an explanation. He maintained that he had not interfered with the investigation and disputed the circumstances cited against him.
His explanation included references to his presence in Wayanad during rescue and relief operations following the Mundakkai-Chooralmala landslides in 2024, when some of the alleged interference was said to have occurred.
The state police chief considered his response alongside the findings submitted by the Special Investigation Team before recommending further action.
Director General of Police Ravada A Chandrasekhar forwarded the investigation findings to the Home Department, leading to the government’s decision to suspend the officer.
Home Minister Ramesh Chennithala subsequently recommended disciplinary action, which received the approval of Chief Minister V D Satheesan.
The latest extension also follows questions over the progress of departmental proceedings against Ajith Kumar.
Under the All India Services disciplinary framework, the continuation of an officer’s suspension beyond the initial prescribed period is subject to procedural requirements and review.
The government must ensure that any extension complies with applicable service rules, including provisions governing the review of suspension orders and the initiation of disciplinary proceedings.
Questions had emerged over delays in appointing an inquiry officer to examine the allegations formally after the original suspension was imposed.
The distinction between suspension and disciplinary findings remains significant.
(The article ‘ADGP Ajith Kumar suspension extended’ appeared first on Free Press Journal.)
Follow Arabian Post
Select Arabian Post as your preferred source on Google and MSN News for trusted business news and Arab politics and updates.
