News related to
Tumble

Shares of the national carrier InterGlobe Aviation — operator of IndiGo — have tumbled over the last week after the airline cancelled thousands of flights following implementation of stricter pilot-duty regulations. Regulatory pressure and mounting costs have weighed on sentiment, yet several brokerages are urging investors to stay the course, citing the airline’s cost advantages and long-term dominance in the domestic market.

The aviation watchdog Directorate General of Civil Aviation has ordered IndiGo to slash its winter schedule ― first by 5 per cent, then escalating to a 10 per cent reduction ― in response to widespread cancellations and what regulators described as the carrier’s inability to manage the higher demands of new Flight Duty Time Limitations norms.

Operationally, the carrier flagged fatigue-rule compliance, crew scheduling bottlenecks and minor technical issues as reasons for the cancellations. It said a full root-cause analysis is underway.

Despite forecasting that IndiGo might cancel as many as 11,000 flights overall — incurring revenue losses of roughly ₹12–14 billion and reducing net profits by ₹3–5 billion — global banking major HSBC has retained a “Buy” rating for InterGlobe, while trimming its price target for FY26–27. Analysts say the airline’s unit cost per seat-kilometre might rise only around 1 per cent even after additional pilot hires.

Supporters of the airline point out that IndiGo remains the only Indian carrier ramping up capacity by roughly 50 aircraft each year — a growth rate unmatched by competitors such as Air India, SpiceJet or Akasa Air. This expansion underlines its dominant market share and suggests that regulatory interest in capping capacity is unlikely, even amid the crisis.

Not all are convinced. Credit-rating agency Moody’s flagged the flight disruptions as “credit negative,” pointing to potential long-term damage from compensation claims, refunds, potential DGCA penalties and erosion of customer trust. The agency also downgraded IndiGo’s human-capital score — citing slower hiring and inability to scale crew strength for its expanding fleet.

Market technicians have sounded alarms, noting that the share price has broken key support levels and fallen below major moving averages, a trend that could continue if recoveries don’t materialise.

Within the company, top leadership has attempted to calm nerves. IndiGo’s CEO has acknowledged the disruptions, termed the episode a “network reboot” and said flights are being progressively restored. The airline also disclosed that refunds for stranded passengers have been processed, luggage backlog cleared for most, and on-time performance is edging back towards normal.

Amid this turbulence, investors and regulators alike will watch closely whether IndiGo can restore operational stability in the coming weeks, and whether its long-term advantages in scale and cost can withstand the upheaval sparked by regulation and mis-management.

Shares of Twenty One Capital, the newly public Bitcoin-native company, plunged sharply as trading began on the New York Stock Exchange under ticker “XXI”. The decline, amounting to roughly 24-26%, underscores investor unease even as the firm debuts with substantial holdings — over 43,500 bitcoins, valued at nearly US$4 billion, making it one of the largest corporate Bitcoin treasuries globally.

The decline came just as the firm completed a merger with special-purpose acquisition company Cantor Equity Partners, a process that had secured shareholder approval earlier this month. The combined entity began trading today, marking the formal public debut of Twenty One Capital.

The backers behind Twenty One include stablecoin issuer Tether, trading platform Bitfinex, and investment-holding conglomerate SoftBank Group — with the SPAC sponsored by global financial firm Cantor Fitzgerald.

Leadership under co-founder and CEO Jack Mallers has portrayed Twenty One as more than a treasury — the firm aims to build Bitcoin-centric financial services, capital markets advisory, lending and education operations. The business model seeks to marry a large Bitcoin reserve with recurring-revenue operations, offering investors both exposure to crypto and conventional business growth potential.

Despite the ambitious roadmap and deep institutional backing, investor sentiment appears cautious. The dip in share price comes amid a broader downturn in cryptocurrency valuations; bitcoin itself has fallen more than 28% since hitting a peak in October. That decline has put pressure on companies with large digital-asset treasuries.

Market watchers note that the stumble highlights the risks inherent in combining a speculative asset like bitcoin with public equity. Treasury-centric crypto firms have gained attention in recent months for treating bitcoin as a corporate reserve asset — yet, as volatility returns, their valuations are bearing the brunt. Some analysts argue the drop may force such firms to rethink reliance solely on crypto-treasury value, especially if markets remain turbulent.

For now, Twenty One’s challenge is to reassure shareholders that the business side will grow fast enough to absorb volatility in bitcoin prices. Its future will depend on execution: whether it can build a sustainable loan, advisory or media business around Bitcoin — and whether that strategy can hold up even if crypto markets remain unpredictable.

By Ashok Nilakantan Ayers SILICON VALLEY / SAN FRANSISCO / CALIFORNIA: The numbers are staggering. Microsoft has spent over $20 billion building data centres stuffed with the most powerful computer chips ever made. Meta is burning through billions more, weaving artificial intelligence into Instagram, WhatsApp, and Facebook. Google and Amazon are locked in a cloud-computing […]

The article The Great AI Gold Rush By US Big Tech Companies Through Huge Investment appeared first on Latest India news, analysis and reports on Newspack by India Press Agency).

Global stock markets continue to experience significant losses, with sharp declines across major indices in Asia and other regions. The ongoing sell-off in equities has been driven by a combination of factors, including rising fears surrounding the stability of the global economy and concerns over the sustainability of the recent surge in artificial intelligence investments. These developments have raised alarm among investors, who are now bracing for the potential consequences of an AI bubble burst. As shares in major companies tumble, analysts are warning that the broader market could face deeper turmoil if the situation continues to deteriorate.

The volatility began when shares in leading technology firms, particularly in the AI sector, showed signs of weakness. Companies such as Google, Microsoft, and NVIDIA, which have heavily invested in AI technologies, saw substantial declines in their stock prices. Google’s CEO, Sundar Pichai, joined the growing chorus of voices warning that no company, regardless of its size or industry, would be immune if the AI-driven bubble were to burst. His remarks have further heightened concerns about the potential risks associated with the rapid adoption of AI technologies in various sectors, from finance to healthcare and manufacturing.

The sell-off has not been limited to just tech stocks. Broader market indices have also suffered, with the MSCI Asia-Pacific Index recording steep losses. Investors are particularly focused on the outlook for interest rates, as central banks, especially the Federal Reserve, have indicated that they will continue their tightening policies to combat inflation. This uncertainty regarding monetary policy has contributed to the risk-off sentiment, leading many investors to retreat from stocks and other risk assets.

Compounding the situation, the price of bitcoin, a barometer for risk appetite, has fallen to a seven-month low, reflecting the broader pullback from riskier assets. The digital currency, which had seen impressive gains earlier in the year, has now become a symbol of the broader unease in global financial markets. Its drop has triggered additional concerns, with some market participants fearing that the crypto market’s downturn could further exacerbate the sell-off in traditional equities.

The economic uncertainty has been exacerbated by geopolitical tensions, including the ongoing trade disputes between major economies, rising energy prices, and concerns over global supply chains. These factors have combined to create a perfect storm for investors, who are now facing mounting pressure to reassess their portfolios and risk exposures.

Corporate earnings reports are also under scrutiny, with many firms expected to report weaker-than-expected results due to higher input costs and slowing demand. Companies that had previously benefited from the pandemic-driven digital transformation, such as e-commerce giants and cloud computing providers, are now seeing their growth rates slow down. This slowdown is further contributing to the negative sentiment surrounding the stock market.

As the stock market sell-off continues, experts are advising caution and suggesting that investors should prepare for continued volatility in the months ahead. Some are calling for a reassessment of the risk associated with high-growth sectors, particularly those heavily reliant on AI technologies, while others recommend diversification to protect against potential downturns.

By K Raveendran Oil prices fell to their lowest level in five months on Tuesday, continuing a slide that has gathered pace over the past several weeks. The benchmark Brent and West Texas Intermediate crude futures have both dipped significantly, erasing much of the year’s earlier gains. In stark contrast, gold has soared to an […]

The article Gold Feeds On Oil’s Misfortune; One Hits The Roof, The Other Down In The Dumps appeared first on Latest India news, analysis and reports on Newspack by India Press Agency).

A GoMining-commissioned survey of over 700 Bitcoin holders across North America and Europe reveals that 77 percent of respondents have never engaged with any BTCFi platform. Only around 8 percent say they actively use BTCFi services for lending, staking or yield generation.

The data exposes a striking contradiction: while the BTCFi sector is receiving strong investment and attention, its reach among actual Bitcoin holders remains minimal. Over 65 percent of those surveyed could not name a single BTCFi protocol, pointing to a significant awareness gap in the industry. Roughly 40 percent of respondents say they would allocate less than 20 percent of their Bitcoin to DeFi products—underscoring cautious attitudes steeped in mistrust or lack of comprehension.

GoMining CEO Mark Zalan argues the survey reflects a mismatch in product design: “There’s an enormous appetite for these opportunities, but the industry has built products for crypto natives, not for everyday Bitcoin holders.” He cautions that BTCFi platforms must prioritise simplicity, trust and education over technical sophistication if they are to attract a broader base.

Despite limited adoption, interest in BTCFi is not absent. Some 73 percent of respondents express a desire to earn yield on their Bitcoin through lending or staking, while 42 percent would like access to liquidity without selling. Yet for now those desires largely remain theoretical.

The survey publication coincides with a sharp rise in BTCFi venture capital activity. Data from industry trackers show that in the first half of 2025, funding to Bitcoin-related infrastructure, custody, and DeFi projects reached US$175 million, spread across 32 funding rounds—20 of which targeted consumer-facing applications. Total value locked in BTCFi has also climbed, hitting US$6.6 billion by mid-2025, up from modest levels just a year earlier.

Industry analysts see this as a pivotal moment. BTCFi is theoretically well-positioned: Bitcoin holders collectively control over US$1 trillion in assets, and unlocking even a small portion into yield markets would shift capital flows substantially. But bridging the adoption chasm requires more than protocol robustness—it demands user trust, transparent security models, and intuitive onboarding.

Several projects are experimenting with custodial BTCFi models that reduce user friction, essentially merging decentralised finance with familiar wallet experiences. These hybrids aim to lower the barrier to entry for mainstream holders who are wary of self-custody risks. Others are focusing on streamlined education and marketing campaigns to bring awareness of BTCFi’s value proposition to non-tech audiences, rather than relying exclusively on high-end technical features.

Skeptics argue the reliance on Ethereum’s DeFi archetype may be a poor fit for Bitcoin’s more conservative base. BTCFi protocols often demand bridging, wrapping or interacting with smart contracts—actions that alienate users comfortable with simpler vehicles like ETFs and custodial wallets. A portion of Bitcoin holders remain risk-averse by nature, preferring regulated, custodial holdings and avoiding experimental protocols.

Some in the industry suggest a phased approach: target early adopters first, establish trust metrics, then gradually roll out to mainstream holders. Others urge a revisit to design philosophy itself: ensuring BTCFi can deliver yield, liquidity and composability while behaving in a way Bitcoin users find intuitive and safe.

Barclays will prohibit customers from using personal credit and debit cards for any cryptocurrency transactions from 27 June 2025. The decision, targeting consumer protection, stems from mounting regulatory pressure and rising concerns over debt and fraud linked to crypto purchases.

The bank’s initiative aligns with guidance from the UK Financial Conduct Authority, which has flagged credit-fuelled crypto investments as high‑risk. Starting late June, any attempt to buy cryptocurrencies—such as Bitcoin or Ethereum—via personal Barclays cards will be automatically declined.

Barclays emphasises that this move is about protecting customers from potentially volatile assets acquired under credit. A spokesperson noted that while personal cards are blocked, other payment methods remain available. The bank asserts that safeguarding consumer finances remains its priority.

The FCA has long warned about the dangers of unregulated crypto assets, especially when purchased on credit. Consumers may accumulate unmanageable debt rapidly if asset prices tumble. Barclays’ policy mirrors earlier actions by Nationwide, Lloyds, and HSBC, which have instituted similar restrictions in recent years.

Industry observers suggest the move reflects wider regulatory caution. “We challenge the proposed ban…as it unfairly equates legitimate investment activity with gambling,” representatives from the UK Payments Association said. They argue customers deserve autonomy but acknowledge the bank’s concern over addiction-like behaviours and debt accumulation.

Financial behaviour analysts note that this policy is likely to reduce impulsive crypto spending, especially among less experienced investors. One market strategist commented, “The withdrawal of credit-based routes to crypto is a logical policy to limit rapid losses when prices plunge.” It may also influence broader market dynamics if other major banks adopt similar stances.

Retail crypto platforms responded with caution. Some are exploring partnerships with open finance firms, enabling bank transfers or peer-to-peer methods that evade card-related restrictions. However, these solutions still face regulatory scrutiny.

The FCA anticipates that removing credit channels will also decrease susceptibility to scams. Fraudulent schemes often exploit lending mechanisms to siphon user funds—something Barclays hopes to curtail under its new rule.

Barclays’ action adds to a string of regulatory-led shifts. After blocking card payments to Binance in July 2021, in line with an FCA notice, the bank has maintained a cautious approach. Now, the new policy encompasses all crypto transactions, regardless of the provider. While withdrawals and direct payments from existing accounts remain permitted, no credit is extended to purchase digital assets.

Crypto firms warn that this may inadvertently push users towards unregulated or foreign exchanges, increasing systemic exposure risks. They advocate for balanced regulation that allows innovation while shielding vulnerable consumers.

Despite industry pushback, Barclays notes that the measure only affects purchases with credit cards and does not restrict broader digital finance use. It emphasises support for regular account holders, offering alternative payment methods such as debit card direct transfers and open banking options.

Pi Network’s native token, PI, plunged to a low of approximately $0.40 following a sudden unlock and broader market sell‑off, but recent developments indicate a tentative rebound that may reshape its trajectory.

The token had tumbled roughly 35% over a short timeframe, bottoming out at $0.40 before rebounding near $0.60—marking a swift 40% recovery since June 13. Technical indicators show that PI found support at a critical $0.39 level, considered a “value area low,” which triggered aggressive buying and a solid recovery candle.

Market analysts attribute the initial crash to a dual catalyst: the unlocking of some 280 million tokens on 11 June and escalating geopolitical tensions affecting global cryptomarkets. The influx of new supply triggered panic selling, exacerbated by macro‑market uncertainty—echoing patterns seen in earlier altcoin sell‑offs amid the Israel‑Iran tensions.

Further pressure stemmed from technical sell signals. PI dipped beneath its value area low but recovered swiftly—reflecting a classic false breakdown scenario that often precedes rebounds in trader psychology. Analysts highlight the critical resistance zone between $0.65 and $0.80: clearing $0.65 could pave the way for a push to $0.80, but failure to hold above $0.61 risks another drop toward $0.57–$0.60.

Broader technical sentiment remains mixed. On one hand, bullish patterns suggest floor levels have been re‑established; on the other, indicators like MACD remain bearish with death crosses and moving averages still overhead—signalling ongoing downward bias unless momentum shifts. The Relative Strength Index hovering below neutral levels hints at entrenched selling pressure.

Longer‑term forecasts for PI vary widely. Some platforms model a gradual climb toward $2–5 by 2027–2028, potentially reaching $10 only in the 2030s, contingent on substantial ecosystem growth—particularly from apps, PiAds, verified users, and major exchange listings. For example, CoinCodex’s algorithm estimates a $10 target as far off as November 2045.

Real‑world applications and mainstream exchange listings are viewed as pivotal. A Binance listing, for instance, could trigger a rally toward $8–$10, but such speculation remains unverified. Conversely, persistent unlock schedules and wallet‑to‑exchange flows continue to weigh on sentiment.

Tokenomics pose another challenge. With a potential maximum supply reaching dozens of billions, PI requires sustained demand—via decentralised apps, micropayments, or adverts—to absorb incoming supply and sustain valuations.

Despite turbulence, the Pi ecosystem is forging ahead. The launch of a $100 million Pi Network Ventures fund aims to support startups across AI, gaming, fintech, and e‑commerce. Meanwhile, the core network continues onboarding users, though some report frustration over KYC bottlenecks, wallet migration issues, and delays in accessing the mainnet.

The community appears split. On‑chain revelations show leverage derivatives listings on platforms like Kraken Pro—a possible sign of institutional curiosity—while sentiment indicators reflect rising caution.

Short‑term outlook hinges on whether PI can maintain support above $0.61 and break through the $0.65 resistance. If momentum continues from the rebound, the token could extend toward $0.80 and potentially $1. Conversely, a failure to hold onto current gains might push it back toward the low‑$0.50s.

Though the narrative of PI reaching $10 persists—driven by long‑term believers—most analysts agree such futures rely on meaningful network adoption, ecosystem maturity, and clear-cut exchange integrations. For now, the market is focused on stabilising around the $0.60–$0.80 band and resolving token unlock uncertainties to foster a credible case for sustained growth.

Markets across the Gulf and beyond plunged on Friday following a sharp military escalation after Israel struck Iranian nuclear and military sites, triggering drone counter‑attacks by Iran and a broader risk‑off reaction among investors.

Dubai’s benchmark index tumbled 5.1%, its steepest single‑day loss since May 2022, while Abu Dhabi’s dropped 3.5% before paring losses. The rout extended into Israel, where the shekel slid as much as 3.5% against the dollar, with long‑dated Israeli bonds and select regional government debt also weakening.

Commodity markets mirrored investor anxiety. Brent crude surged over 6%, touching its highest level in nearly five months, as traders assessed the risk of supply disruptions through the Strait of Hormuz. Gold likewise rallied, reaching two‑month highs as capital flowed into safe‑haven assets.

Airline stocks were among the hardest hit. Air Arabia shares plunged more than 4%—some reports suggest nearly 8%—as carriers rerouted flights away from airspace over Iran, Israel, Iraq and Jordan. Regional exchanges in Riyadh and Doha were closed on Friday, with trading set to resume on Sunday amid anticipation of continued volatility.

The market shockwaves reverberated worldwide. Europe, Asia and US indices all registered dips: the S&P 500 dropped roughly 0.4% mid‑day, the Dow slipped nearly 1.8% and the Nasdaq around 1.3%, while Tokyo’s Nikkei and Hong Kong’s Hang Seng also declined.

Analysts warned that while markets historically absorb such shocks fairly quickly, the sustained threat of conflict brings inflation and growth risks. Chris Scicluna of Daiwa Capital Markets noted the initial oil spike “hasn’t been too extreme” but cautioned that a sustained rise toward US $80 oil would be problematic for central banks. Meanwhile, Tariq Kakish of FH Capital pointed out that geopolitical instability remains “the key factor affecting investors’ sentiments”.

Concerns centred on the Strait of Hormuz, which channels approximately one‑third of global seaborne oil, raising the potential for disruption. Demand for insurance on tankers in the Gulf surged, and traders remain on edge over possible Iranian retaliation targeting shipping or oil infrastructure. However, OPEC+ sources suggest that Saudi Arabia and others retain sufficient spare capacity and are monitoring the situation closely.

Financial markets also showed classic risk‑off behaviour: US Treasury bonds rallied even as yields ticked higher, reflecting investor concerns about energised inflation, as per Axios commentary. The dollar strengthened, while gold and the Swiss franc benefited from increased flight‑to‑safety demand.

In Asia, the ASX 200 slipped modestly, offsetting losses in financials and consumer sectors with gains in energy and mining stocks. In Mumbai, Reliance Industries’ shares fell nearly 1.8% as Brent crude surged past $75 per barrel amidst the tensions.

Political and economic analysts emphasise two themes: the possibility of an enduring inflation shock from energy price escalation, and the risk of prolonged conflict dragging in wider regional powers. While some argue Gulf states may help mitigate supply-side shocks via increased production, others highlight that even modest increases in oil prices could influence global inflation and central bank policy.

Despite the turbulence, multiple analysts noted past flare‑ups between Israel and Iran tended to cool within weeks, with markets rebounding once diplomatic pathways re‑opened. Yet this episode differs: it involves overt attacks deep into Iranian territory, targeting nuclear and ballistic infrastructure, and marking a new phase in the conflict. The outcome may recalibrate norms for military engagement in the region—and investor expectations alongside them.