The assessment remains unconfirmed, but Chen said investigators had identified internet protocol behaviour and on-chain patterns consistent with techniques used by known North Korean hacking organisations. Bitget has not publicly named a specific group, and the investigation is continuing with cybersecurity firms Mandiant and SlowMist and relevant authorities.
Bitget on Friday raised its estimate of assets transferred to attacker-controlled addresses from $351.6 million to approximately $387.5 million. The company said the increase reflected a fuller accounting of the same September 24 incident, including Zcash and TRON assets omitted from its initial calculation, rather than additional unauthorised transfers.
The exchange said its security systems detected unauthorised transfers at 18:31 UTC on September 24 involving a limited number of hot and warm wallets. Its cold wallets were not affected, while the separate self-custodial Bitget Wallet operates on independent infrastructure and was also unaffected.
Chen said the attacker compromised a critical backend system within Bitget’s wallet infrastructure, spoofing transaction data and invoking authorisation processes to transfer assets. She said private keys were not compromised. Bitget later said it had identified the attack path and the method used to bypass existing security controls, and had remediated the underlying vulnerability.
The affected assets included XRP, Ether, Tether, Zcash, USD Coin, USDT0, Tether Gold, BNB, Avalanche and TRX, spread across Ethereum and other Ethereum Virtual Machine networks, the XRP Ledger, Zcash and TRON. Bitget said the incident had been contained and no further unauthorised transfers were possible.
The exchange temporarily suspended withdrawals while deposits and trading continued. It has now set out a phased restoration schedule, with Bitcoin withdrawals due to resume on September 28, followed by Ether on September 29 and USDT on September 30. Withdrawals for other tokens, along with fiat and peer-to-peer services, are scheduled to return on October 2.
Bitget has maintained that customer account balances remain accurate and that users will not bear losses arising from the breach. Chen said the financial impact falls within the coverage of the company’s User Protection Fund, which Bitget valued at more than $464 million after the attack.
Bitget said the protection fund held 5,500 Bitcoin, worth about $464 million at the time of its statement, and was designed to provide a safeguard for users during security events. The company said the breach did not require customers to absorb the transferred assets. The fund’s value can fluctuate with Bitcoin prices, making the size of the buffer variable even when its cryptocurrency holdings remain unchanged.
The company has also launched a recovery bounty programme aimed at encouraging assistance in freezing or recovering stolen assets. Under the scheme, eligible parties whose voluntary actions directly result in funds being frozen can receive a bounty equal to 5 per cent of the amount successfully frozen, with further rewards available for recovered assets.
Some stolen funds have already been frozen through coordination with industry participants, according to Bitget. Blockchain investigators have separately tracked rapid movements and conversions of parts of the stolen portfolio across several networks, complicating recovery efforts while leaving substantial sums visible in attacker-controlled addresses.
The North Korea attribution is significant because blockchain intelligence firms have documented sustained theft by hacking groups linked to Pyongyang. Elliptic said the Bitget incident, if the attribution is confirmed, would push the value of crypto assets it has tracked as stolen by North Korean-linked actors during 2026 above $1 billion.
TRM Labs has also estimated that North Korea-linked groups accounted for roughly three-quarters of cryptocurrency thefts during 2026 before the Bitget investigation is completed. Such assessments are based on technical indicators, transaction tracing and behavioural similarities, but attribution in cyber incidents can change as investigations develop.
Arabian Post – Crypto News Network
Follow Arabian Post
Select Arabian Post as your preferred source on Google and MSN News for trusted business news and Arab politics and updates.