News related to
Japan’s

The campaign is anchored on the principle that good intentions (niat yang baik), when demonstrated through kind and thoughtful actions (amal budi yang indah) will lead to meaningful outcomes. This theme is brought to life through a self-produced Ramadan Aidilfitri 2026 brand video, available on the Bank’s official YouTube channel.

NIAT TO EMPOWER THE COMMUNITY : SALAM PRIHATIN 4.0

Hashtag: #AEONBank

https://aeonbank.com.my/
https://www.linkedin.com/company/aeonbankmy
https://www.instagram.com/aeonbankmy

The issuer is solely responsible for the content of this announcement.

ABOUT AEON BANK (M) BERHAD

Measures of market anxiety tied to Japanese equities climbed sharply as investors reacted to the sudden rise in global energy prices and mounting geopolitical tensions affecting oil supply routes. The spike in volatility coincided with a steep sell-off in Tokyo’s equity market, where the Nikkei 225 index plunged more than 7 per cent during trading while the broader Topix index fell over 6 per cent, marking one of the most severe declines in several years.

Traders and analysts attribute the surge in market fear to an abrupt reversal of expectations that had supported Japan’s equity rally earlier in the year. A powerful jump in crude prices above the $100-a-barrel threshold has heightened concerns about rising import costs, inflationary pressure and potential disruption to the country’s fragile economic recovery.

Japan remains one of the world’s largest importers of energy resources, relying heavily on overseas supplies for oil and liquefied natural gas. The sharp rise in crude prices therefore carries immediate implications for corporate profitability, household spending and the nation’s trade balance. Higher fuel costs can quickly feed into transport, manufacturing and electricity prices, creating ripple effects across the broader economy.

Equity strategists say that markets had been pricing in a favourable scenario for Japan’s corporate sector, including stable energy costs, a weaker yen that supports exporters, and gradual improvement in domestic consumption. The oil shock has complicated that outlook, prompting investors to reassess earnings forecasts and risk exposure.

The volatility gauge for Japanese equities, often referred to as the market’s “fear index,” spiked to levels not seen since the early months of the Covid crisis. Such indicators measure the expected turbulence in stock prices based on options trading, and a sharp rise typically signals increased hedging activity by investors preparing for further market swings.

The abrupt shift in sentiment comes amid wider turbulence across global financial markets. Equity benchmarks across Asia fell sharply as investors reacted to the energy price shock and rising geopolitical tensions in the Middle East, a region responsible for a large share of global oil production. The surge in crude prices has revived worries that inflation could accelerate again just as many central banks were expected to ease monetary policy.

Market participants say the latest volatility reflects more than a temporary correction. Analysts note that the rally in Japanese equities had drawn significant foreign investment during the past year, encouraged by corporate governance reforms, share buybacks and improved shareholder returns. Strong gains in technology stocks and export-oriented companies had helped drive the Nikkei to multi-decade highs.

Rising energy costs now threaten to undermine some of those positive dynamics. Japan’s manufacturing sector, including carmakers and electronics producers, depends heavily on imported raw materials and fuel. A sustained rise in oil prices could increase production costs and squeeze margins, particularly for companies unable to pass higher expenses on to consumers.

Currency movements add another layer of complexity. The yen often weakens when oil prices surge because the country must spend more on energy imports. While a weaker currency can benefit exporters by boosting overseas earnings, it also increases the cost of imported fuel and food, intensifying inflationary pressure on households.

Economic policymakers are watching the developments closely. Officials at the Bank of Japan have maintained an accommodative monetary stance even as other major central banks tightened policy to fight inflation. The current surge in energy prices raises questions about how the central bank might respond if inflationary pressure accelerates further while economic growth slows.

Financial analysts emphasise that volatility indicators should not be interpreted as a prediction of sustained market decline. Instead, they reflect heightened uncertainty and the demand for protection against abrupt price swings. Still, such spikes often coincide with periods of intense market stress and rapid portfolio adjustments.

Energy-related stocks and commodity producers have been among the few segments to benefit from the oil surge, as higher crude prices can boost revenues for companies involved in exploration, refining and trading. Conversely, sectors sensitive to fuel costs, including airlines, shipping and heavy manufacturing, have faced selling pressure.

Global investors are also weighing broader geopolitical risks tied to the energy market. Disruptions to shipping routes in key waterways used for oil transport could tighten supply and prolong elevated prices. Analysts warn that if crude remains above the $100-a-barrel mark for an extended period, the impact could spread beyond equity markets into inflation expectations, bond yields and currency movements.

Tokyo plans to release about 80 million barrels from its emergency stockpiles, equivalent to roughly 45 days of domestic consumption, according to government officials. The decision is designed to stabilise fuel supplies and dampen price pressures as shipping through the Strait of Hormuz — a key artery for global energy trade — has been severely disrupted by the conflict involving Iran, the United States and Israel.

Takaichi said Japan would move ahead with the release rather than wait for coordinated international action, reflecting concerns that prolonged disruption could tighten supplies for import-dependent Asian economies. Officials indicated that private-sector reserves would be drawn down first, followed by state stockpiles, allowing domestic refiners to maintain operations and ensure sufficient petroleum product supply to the market.

Energy security has become an urgent priority for Tokyo as nearly all of its crude imports originate from Middle Eastern producers such as Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, Kuwait and Qatar. Around 70 per cent of that oil typically travels through the Strait of Hormuz, a narrow waterway between Iran and Oman that normally handles roughly one-fifth of the world’s seaborne oil trade.

The ongoing conflict has sharply reduced tanker traffic through the strait after missile and drone attacks targeted vessels and infrastructure across the region. Shipping companies have diverted or halted voyages, leaving more than a hundred tankers anchored outside the corridor while insurers raised war-risk premiums. Oil prices have surged above $100 a barrel amid fears of prolonged supply disruption and escalating geopolitical tensions.

Japan’s move also comes as the International Energy Agency considers one of the largest coordinated releases of emergency oil reserves in history. Member countries of the agency have discussed releasing hundreds of millions of barrels to counter supply losses triggered by the conflict and calm volatile energy markets.

Officials in Tokyo signalled that the unilateral step could be followed by participation in a broader international release if the crisis deepens. Policymakers argue that acting quickly could prevent domestic fuel shortages and limit the economic damage of rising energy costs.

Economic pressure is mounting across Japan as oil and liquefied natural gas prices climb. The country imports the vast majority of its energy resources, leaving it highly vulnerable to geopolitical shocks. Higher fuel costs have already begun to affect industrial production, with petrochemical producers scaling back output and transport costs rising across supply chains.

The surge in energy prices poses a challenge for Takaichi’s government, which has pledged to strengthen economic growth while managing inflation and stabilising household costs. Economists warn that sustained oil prices above $140 per barrel could slow economic expansion and revive fears of stagflation in a country already grappling with a fragile recovery.

Energy analysts say the planned release from strategic reserves may provide short-term relief but will not fully offset the scale of disruption if shipping through the Strait of Hormuz remains constrained. The waterway normally carries about 20 million barrels of oil each day, linking Gulf producers to major Asian consumers including Japan, China and South Korea.

Japan maintains one of the world’s largest emergency oil stockpiles. Combined government and private reserves are estimated to cover more than 200 days of consumption, giving authorities significant flexibility during supply shocks. Such reserves are designed precisely for crises triggered by geopolitical events or natural disasters that threaten global energy flows.

Government officials say the release will be phased to ensure a stable supply chain and avoid sudden market distortions. Domestic refiners are expected to receive the first shipments from storage facilities, allowing them to continue processing crude into petrol, diesel and other fuels.

The last major release of strategic reserves by Japan occurred during the global energy turmoil following Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, when coordinated action among advanced economies sought to stabilise crude markets and ease inflationary pressure worldwide.

Current circumstances, however, present a more complex challenge because of the geographic concentration of supply risks. The Middle East remains the dominant source of Japan’s oil imports, and prolonged instability in the region could reshape energy strategies for Asia’s largest economies.

Policymakers in Tokyo have begun exploring longer-term measures to reduce exposure to supply shocks. Discussions include expanding renewable energy capacity, diversifying import sources and accelerating the restart of nuclear reactors that were shut down after the Fukushima disaster.

Supporters of nuclear power argue that restoring more reactors could lower dependence on imported fossil fuels and help shield the economy from geopolitical turbulence in global energy markets. Opponents remain cautious, citing safety concerns and public resistance in several regions.

Global Hotel Alliance has strengthened its footprint in East Asia after signing a partnership with Tokyu Hotels & Resorts, bringing a major Japanese hospitality operator into the alliance’s loyalty and distribution network and marking a significant expansion into one of the world’s most established travel markets.

The agreement integrates Tokyu Hotels & Resorts, which manages the TOKYU HOTELS chain and several affiliated brands across Japan, into Global Hotel Alliance’s GHA DISCOVERY loyalty ecosystem. The move allows travellers staying at Tokyu properties to earn and redeem rewards across the alliance’s international portfolio, while offering Tokyu access to millions of loyalty members and a wider global marketing platform.

Headquartered in Dubai, Global Hotel Alliance represents a consortium of independent hotel brands that cooperate on loyalty programmes, distribution systems and shared technology platforms while retaining operational independence. The alliance counts dozens of hospitality brands spanning hundreds of properties worldwide. By welcoming Tokyu Hotels & Resorts, GHA gains an important presence in Japan’s domestic and inbound tourism sector, an area that has drawn increasing interest from international hospitality networks.

Tokyu Hotels & Resorts operates more than 40 hotels across Japan under brands including TOKYU HOTELS, Tokyu REI Hotel and other affiliated concepts. Many of its properties are located in key urban and resort destinations such as Tokyo, Yokohama, Kyoto, Osaka and Sapporo. Through the partnership, the group will connect its hotels to GHA DISCOVERY, a loyalty programme that offers members benefits such as room upgrades, flexible rewards and local experiences tied to destination culture.

Executives from both organisations describe the partnership as strategically aligned with rising demand for travel to Japan. Tourism to the country has surged as international travel continues to rebound, with visitor arrivals climbing sharply and hospitality groups seeking deeper engagement with global distribution networks and loyalty platforms.

GHA’s leadership said the addition of Tokyu Hotels & Resorts strengthens the alliance’s reach in Asia while offering travellers greater access to accommodation options in Japan. Access to the GHA DISCOVERY platform also opens new channels for Tokyu properties to reach travellers from Europe, the Middle East and North America who are already members of the programme.

Tokyu Hotels & Resorts sees the collaboration as a way to enhance international visibility for its hotels while preserving the local identity that defines many of its properties. Japanese hospitality operators have historically relied heavily on domestic demand, though international partnerships have gained momentum as inbound tourism expands and travellers seek more diverse accommodation experiences.

Japan’s tourism sector has undergone major changes in the past decade as the government and private sector push to attract more overseas visitors. Infrastructure upgrades, expanded air connectivity and marketing campaigns have helped position the country as a leading travel destination in Asia. Hospitality companies are responding by strengthening international alliances, investing in technology platforms and adapting loyalty programmes to compete with global hotel chains.

Global Hotel Alliance’s model differs from traditional hotel groups that operate under a single brand portfolio. Instead, it links independent brands that share a common loyalty and technology framework while maintaining separate identities and management structures. This structure appeals to regional hotel companies that want global exposure without surrendering brand control.

Industry analysts note that loyalty ecosystems have become central to hospitality competition. Major international chains rely heavily on large membership bases to drive repeat bookings and reduce reliance on online travel agencies. Independent hotel brands, which often lack such scale individually, have increasingly turned to alliances such as GHA to achieve similar reach.

GHA DISCOVERY now includes millions of members worldwide who accumulate rewards known as DISCOVERY Dollars when staying at participating properties. These digital rewards can be spent on future hotel stays, dining or experiences across the alliance network. The programme also focuses on destination-based benefits designed to highlight local culture and activities.

For Tokyu Hotels & Resorts, integration into the programme allows guests to participate in the broader network while still experiencing Japanese hospitality traditions often associated with domestic hotel operators. Many Tokyu properties emphasise regional design, culinary offerings and proximity to transport hubs, particularly within major metropolitan areas.

The alliance has pursued steady expansion in Asia as travel demand shifts across the region. Partnerships with hospitality companies in markets such as Thailand, Singapore and the Gulf have broadened its reach, while collaborations with regional hotel groups help introduce new destinations to global travellers.

Japan represents a particularly attractive addition to that network. The country hosts some of Asia’s busiest cities, internationally recognised cultural landmarks and a thriving domestic travel culture. Hotel demand has remained strong across urban centres and resort areas, drawing interest from global investors and hospitality brands.

Takaichi took to her official social media account to address questions about the asset, which adopted her given name and circulated on the Solana blockchain. She said there appeared to be “various misunderstandings” over the name and market activity, stressing she had no prior knowledge of the token and that neither she nor her administration had authorised or endorsed it. The prime minister urged caution among investors and the broader public.

The token, widely referred to in trading circles as a meme coin, experienced wild fluctuations before its value slid by about three-quarters from earlier highs, according to market data. At one point, it drew attention with an inflated valuation that some tracking sites estimated around $27.7 million, although such figures can be volatile and highly sensitive to trading volume and liquidity levels on decentralised platforms.

Analysts say meme coins — especially those leveraging the names or likenesses of well-known personalities — have become a volatile sub-segment within the broader cryptocurrency ecosystem. These assets often lack a fundamental use case and instead draw speculative interest from traders betting on social momentum. When official figures distance themselves from such projects, confidence can evaporate quickly, leading to sharp price corrections.

Japan has long been among the more stringent jurisdictions in setting regulatory frameworks for digital assets. Its Payment Services Act and Financial Instruments and Exchange Act establish registration requirements and investor protection mechanisms for exchanges and token issuers operating within the country. However, this governance framework primarily targets regulated entities, leaving decentralised creations like meme tokens in a less clear-cut category. That regulatory ambiguity complicates efforts to police tokens that may be named after public figures without consent.

The sharp downturn in the coin’s price following Takaichi’s statement reflects how sentiments can shift dramatically in unregulated corners of crypto markets. Traders who had driven speculative interest in the token — buoyed by social media buzz — appear to have retreated as the prime minister’s denial circulated. Some onlookers also noted that meme coins relying on novelty or persona-based branding are particularly susceptible to pump-and-dump patterns, rewarding early holders at the expense of later investors when momentum fades.

Legal experts note that the use of a serving head of government’s name for a speculative financial instrument raises both ethical and legal questions. “The unauthorised use of a public official’s name in association with a financial product can mislead investors about endorsement or legitimacy,” said a fintech law specialist at a Tokyo university. “Enforcement is difficult when creators remain anonymous and operate outside regulated frameworks, but it invites scrutiny from both legal and policy perspectives.”

Market participants following the episode have pointed to wider trends in the crypto space. Solana, the blockchain on which the token was launched, is favoured by some developers for its low transaction costs and fast settlement times, making it a popular choice for experimental tokens and decentralised applications. Yet this very accessibility can also lower barriers for projects that have little substantive backing or oversight, heightening risk for retail investors.

For Japan’s financial regulators, the incident highlights the ongoing challenge of balancing innovation and investor protection. While the country has taken significant steps to legitimise and supervise digital asset markets, decentralised and anonymous token creations sit outside conventional regulatory reach. As such tokens proliferate beyond mainstream exchange listings, authorities may confront pressure to clarify how existing laws apply or to craft new measures tailored to emerging market behaviours.

Equity markets have responded robustly since Takaichi’s emphatic landslide in the general election on 8 February, with domestic shares climbing sharply on expectations of pro-growth fiscal measures aimed at bolstering consumption and strategic sector investment. The broader Topix index also advanced, and the yen strengthened against the dollar, reflecting a sense of reduced political risk now that the ruling Liberal Democratic Party holds a commanding super-majority in the lower house of parliament. Despite these gains, bond markets have registered heightened volatility, with Japanese Government Bond yields spiking at various maturities, signalling investor unease over Japan’s already elevated public debt levels and the scale of planned fiscal support.

Takaichi’s policy blueprint encompasses an array of measures long favoured by fiscal conservatives and economic nationalists alike, including a two-year suspension of the 8 per cent consumption tax on food items and expanded public investment across sectors such as semiconductors, artificial intelligence and defence. The Prime Minister frames these interventions as critical to ending what she terms “chronic underinvestment” and galvanising growth after decades of modest performance. Economists note that this approach echoes aspects of previous reflationary strategies such as “Abenomics”, with an emphasis on proactive government involvement in crisis-management and targeted growth stimulation.

While equities have responded positively, fixed-income markets have told a more cautious story. Yields on both short- and long-dated JGBs have climbed, reflecting market pricing in potential increases in government borrowing and inflation expectations should growth accelerate faster than anticipated. Some market participants fear that expansive fiscal operations without clear revenue offsets could elevate Japan’s risk premium, potentially triggering fresh volatility or sell-offs in debt markets should confidence ebb.

The so-called “Takaichi trade” has been a defining narrative across markets, capturing the dual dynamic of optimism in equity performance and trepidation around sovereign debt issuance and currency movements. Investors have been closely monitoring the Bank of Japan’s posture, as monetary authorities navigate between maintaining ultra-low interest rates to support economic activity and addressing inflationary pressures that can be exacerbated by a weaker yen. Signals from central bankers and government advisors suggest that rate adjustments could be considered to counter imported inflation, even as policy remains broadly accommodative.

Currency markets have mirrored these conflicting forces. The yen, which initially weakened against the dollar on expectations of aggressive fiscal support and prolonged monetary easing, has later shown episodes of strengthening as risk sentiment and intervention concerns have ebbed and flowed. Japan’s top currency diplomat has emphasised that authorities remain vigilant to exchange-rate volatility and are in close communication with international counterparts, reinforcing that the policy stance is not shifting toward overt market manipulation.

Analysts and investors are also paying attention to cross-border implications. The government faces pressure to deliver on substantial trans-Pacific investment pledges, which hinge on significant capital flows and corporate involvement in overseas projects. Japanese firms have expressed both interest and caution, as logistical and regulatory complexities weigh on decision-making. These external commitments add another layer of scrutiny to Takaichi’s broader economic narrative, which seeks to balance growth ambitions with geopolitical and fiscal credibility.

Within Japan, views on Takaichi’s approach are sharply divided. Supporters argue that decisive action is necessary to break longstanding cycles of low growth and demographic headwinds, positing that strategic tax relief and investment can catalyse domestic demand and technological competitiveness. Critics caution that without robust revenue strategies and prudent debt management, the fiscal trajectory may amplify structural risks rather than alleviate them. Central to this debate is the question of policy coordination: how fiscal expansion will align with monetary oversight and long-term debt sustainability while maintaining investor confidence and macroeconomic stability. New Zealand][7])

• “Geopolitical Volatility” is a top five current and future risk, highlighting the growing instability across the region
• 83 Percent of Firms Report Rising Insurable Risk Costs

TOKYO, JAPAN – Media OutReach Newswire – 12 February 2026 – Aon plc (NYSE: AON), a leading global professional services firm, has released the Japan findings of its 2025 Global Risk Management Survey. The survey reveals that Japanese businesses are navigating a complex landscape marked by persistent cyber threats, supply chain disruptions and weather/natural disasters. The survey, which gathered insights from nearly 3,000 risk managers, C-suite leaders and executives across 63 countries, highlights the unique risks Japan businesses are facing amid global disruption.

Japan’s Top Risks:

“Cyber Attacks/Data Breach” remains the top risk for Japanese businesses, consistent with global trends. “Supply chain or distribution failure” ranks second, as extreme weather events and mounting geopolitical volatility including shifting trade policies force companies to reassess their supply chains. In addition, “Product Liability/Recall” and “Exchange Rate Fluctuation” pose significant risks, reflecting the country’s manufacturing strength and exposure to global market volatility. Notably, 63.6 percent of Japanese respondents reported losses due to product liability or recall issues and 47.6 percent cited losses from exchange rate fluctuations.

Tatsuya Yamamoto, CEO of Japan at Aon, said, “Japanese organisations are operating in an environment of unprecedented complexity. Cyber, weather and geopolitical risks continue to be acute challenges for Japan businesses, underscoring the need for robust risk management frameworks and agile strategies. As market trends shift and competition intensifies, vigilance and adaptability will be key. The interconnectedness of risks – where a cyber attack can disrupt supply chains or geopolitical volatility can trigger regulatory changes – demands a holistic, proactive approach to resilience.”

2025 Top 10 Business Risks in Japan

1. Cyber Attacks/Data Breach
2. Supply Chain or Distribution Failure
3. Weather/Natural Disasters
4. Geopolitical Volatility
5. Business Interruption
6. Economic Slowdown/Slow Recovery
7. Exchange Rate Fluctuation
8. Commodity Price Risk/Scarcity of Materials
9. Product Liability/Recall
10. Failure to Attract or Retain Top Talent

Risk Management: Formalisation and Focus on Insurable Risks

Japanese organisations demonstrate a strong commitment to risk management, with 74.7 percent having a formal risk management and insurance department, compared to 68.4 percent globally. Additionally, 75.3 percent measure the total cost of insurable risk and 83.3 percent report that these costs are increasing. While risk awareness is rising, most organisations have yet to quantify their exposures or leverage advanced analytics.

Japanese Businesses Risk Management Assessments for Top Three Risks

For “Cyber Attacks/Data Breaches”:

1. 27.2 percent have assessed the risk
2. 12.6 percent have developed continuity plans
3. 22.3 Percent have risk management plans

For “Supply Chain or Distribution Failure”:

1. 25 percent have assessed the risk
2. 20 percent have developed continuity plans
3. 26.7 Percent have risk management plans

For “Weather/Natural Disasters”:

1. 24.1 percent have assessed the risk
2. 22.4 percent have developed continuity plans
3. 13.8 percent have risk management plans

Future Risks: Rapidly Changing Market Trends and Geopolitical Volatility

Looking ahead, Japanese organisations expect “Weather/Natural Disasters” and “Geopolitical Volatility” to remain critical risks, alongside “Rapidly Changing Market Trends,” which is more prominent in Japan than globally. This highlights the country’s exposure to climate events and evolving consumer preferences.

Japan’s Top Five Future Business Risks by 2028:

1. Cyber Attacks/Data Breach
2. Weather/Natural Disasters
3. Geopolitical Volatility
4. Rapidly Changing Market Trends
5. Increasing Competition

Shinichi Kandatsu, head of Commercial Risk Solutions for Japan at Aon, said, “Cyber and weather-related risks continue to lead the rankings as top concerns for Japanese businesses today and in the future, with geopolitical volatility also ranking among the top five risks across both periods. This trend reflects the growing instability across the region, with implications for supply chains, regulatory environments and financial performance. In today’s fast-moving market, leveraging advanced data analytics is essential for businesses to anticipate emerging risks, optimise risk capital and build resilience. The findings from Aon’s Global Risk Management Survey provide Japanese businesses with actionable information to benchmark their risk strategies and identify areas for improvement.”

To access the full report and explore how Aon is helping clients navigate today’s disruption dynamic, visit Global Risk Management Survey Japan

Hashtag: #Aon

The issuer is solely responsible for the content of this announcement.

About Aon

Aon plc (NYSE: AON) exists to shape decisions for the better — to protect and enrich the lives of people around the world. Through actionable analytic insight, globally integrated Risk Capital and Human Capital expertise, and locally relevant solutions, our colleagues provide clients in over 120 countries with the clarity and confidence to make better risk and people decisions that help protect and grow their businesses.

Follow Aon on LinkedIn, X, Facebook and Instagram. Stay up-to-date by visiting Aon’s newsroom and sign up for news alerts here.

Disclaimer

The information contained in this document is solely for information purposes, for general guidance only and is not intended to address the circumstances of any particular individual or entity. Although Aon endeavours to provide accurate and timely information and uses sources that it considers reliable, the firm does not warrant, represent or guarantee the accuracy, adequacy, completeness or fitness for any purpose of any content of this document and can accept no liability for any loss incurred in any way by any person who may rely on it. There can be no guarantee that the information contained in this document will remain accurate as on the date it is received or that it will continue to be accurate in the future. No individual or entity should make decisions or act based solely on the information contained herein without appropriate professional advice and targeted research.

The closed-door session, hosted by Khalifa University of Science and Technology with Institute of Energy Economics Japan, reviewed progress under a multi-year framework that links laboratory research to commercial deployment. Participants focused on aligning research priorities with national transition goals in the United Arab Emirates and Japan while ensuring that projects move beyond pilot stages into scaled industrial use.

University officials said the meeting sharpened governance around joint programmes that span hydrogen value chains, grid resilience, carbon management and next-generation manufacturing. The steering board assessed ongoing work on hydrogen carriers and utilisation pathways, including ammonia and synthetic fuels, alongside studies on carbon capture, utilisation and storage that integrate process design with life-cycle analysis. Industry representatives pressed for faster timelines and clearer pathways to demonstration, citing capital discipline and the need for predictable policy signals.

Energy systems dominated the agenda as both countries seek to balance security, affordability and emissions goals. Japan’s import-dependent energy mix and the UAE’s role as a major producer and exporter create complementary incentives for collaboration, delegates noted. Research teams presented updates on high-efficiency electrolysers, advanced catalysts and thermal management, with an emphasis on reducing costs and improving durability under desert and maritime operating conditions.

Another thread centred on digitalisation and artificial intelligence in energy operations. Joint projects are examining how data-driven optimisation can cut losses across generation, storage and transmission, and how digital twins can accelerate plant design and maintenance. Academic leaders argued that co-developed datasets and shared testbeds are essential to attract industrial partners and ensure interoperability across markets.

Advanced materials and manufacturing featured prominently, reflecting interest from automotive, aerospace and heavy-industry partners. Researchers outlined progress in lightweight alloys, composites and coatings designed to withstand extreme temperatures while lowering energy intensity. Industry participants flagged workforce readiness as a bottleneck, urging expanded exchange programmes and co-supervised doctoral tracks to build skills that translate quickly to factory floors.

The steering board also reviewed funding structures and intellectual property frameworks. Both sides reaffirmed commitments to balanced IP arrangements that protect proprietary know-how while enabling publication and talent development. Officials highlighted the importance of predictable co-funding cycles to keep multi-year research teams intact and to de-risk private investment in demonstration assets.

Abu Dhabi’s role as host underscored the emirate’s ambition to serve as a convening hub for applied research and industrial partnerships. Delegates toured university laboratories and pilot facilities to evaluate readiness for scale-up, with particular attention to safety standards and integration with industrial sites. Discussions touched on regulatory alignment and standards development, areas seen as critical to shortening time-to-market for cross-border technologies.

Japanese participants emphasised the value of long-term academic partnerships in sustaining innovation during market cycles. They pointed to the need for rigorous techno-economic assessments to guide policy and investment decisions, and for transparent metrics to track emissions impacts across supply chains. UAE counterparts highlighted the opportunity to test solutions at scale and under demanding conditions, offering feedback loops that can refine designs before global deployment.

Beyond energy, the meeting explored collaboration in water-energy nexus research, climate-resilient infrastructure and systems engineering for smart cities. Presentations examined desalination efficiency, waste-to-value pathways and the integration of distributed resources, reflecting broader industrial interests in sustainability and circularity.

The company said the planned repurchase ceiling reflects a multi-year approach rather than a one-off market intervention, with execution paced according to market conditions, cash flows and strategic priorities. Kyocera has historically favoured conservative capital management, retaining substantial cash buffers to support long investment cycles across components, electronics, materials and energy-related businesses. The proposed scale marks a notable recalibration, suggesting management is prepared to return excess capital while maintaining flexibility for growth spending.

Market participants view the move against a backdrop of sustained corporate governance reform in Japan, where stock exchange guidance and investor activism have encouraged companies to justify capital allocation choices more explicitly. Share buybacks have become a visible response, particularly among firms trading below book value or carrying large cash balances. Kyocera’s announcement fits that pattern, though the delayed start in fiscal 2027 underlines a preference for orderly execution tied to medium-term planning.

The group has spent the past year reviewing portfolio efficiency and profitability across segments, including fine ceramics, semiconductor components, electronic devices and document solutions. Management commentary has emphasised stable cash generation and disciplined investment, with returns assessed against cost of capital. By signalling a sizeable buyback window in advance, Kyocera appears to be seeking to anchor investor expectations around capital returns while avoiding short-term distortions to operating strategy.

Analysts note that Japanese companies have increasingly used multi-year buyback frameworks to balance shareholder returns with industrial policy considerations and long-term employment commitments. Unlike ad-hoc repurchases, extended programmes can be scaled up or down without signalling distress, and they reduce the risk of buying shares at cyclical peaks. For Kyocera, whose earnings are exposed to swings in global electronics demand, that flexibility is likely to be central.

The announcement also highlights intensifying competition for capital among Japanese industrial groups. With domestic interest rates edging higher after years of ultra-loose monetary policy, holding large idle cash positions has become more visibly costly. At the same time, foreign investors have pressed boards to articulate clearer return targets, often favouring buybacks over dividends for their tax efficiency and balance-sheet impact. Kyocera’s plan reflects these cross-currents, even as it preserves room for dividends and strategic investments.

Industry specialists point out that Kyocera’s diversified structure complicates capital allocation decisions. The company spans mature businesses with steady cash flows and growth areas requiring sustained investment, including advanced materials and energy-related technologies. A pre-announced repurchase cap allows management to adjust deployment as segment performance evolves, rather than locking in rigid payout ratios.

From a governance perspective, the move reinforces a broader shift in boardroom priorities. Japanese regulators and exchanges have encouraged companies to engage more directly with shareholders, explain valuation discounts and set measurable improvement goals. Buybacks have emerged as a tangible mechanism to demonstrate responsiveness, particularly when accompanied by operational reforms. Kyocera has indicated that capital efficiency measures will run alongside cost controls, portfolio reviews and selective expansion.

Investor reaction has focused on the signal rather than immediate financial impact, given the programme’s future timeframe. Portfolio managers tracking Japan’s equity market say such announcements contribute to a narrative of structural change, even if execution remains years away. For long-term holders, the clarity around potential capital returns can support valuation, especially when paired with stable operating performance.

Speaking at a New Year gathering at the Tokyo Stock Exchange, Satsuki Katayama, a prominent member of the ruling Liberal Democratic Party known for her advocacy of financial innovation, outlined a vision in which tokenised assets and crypto-linked exchange-traded products operate alongside equities and commodities. While Katayama does not hold the finance minister portfolio, her remarks reflected broader policy debates underway in Tokyo over how far Japan should go in embracing digital finance within its tightly regulated markets.

The comments arrive as global asset managers press Asian regulators to open the door to crypto exchange-traded funds, following approvals in the United States and growing institutional interest in Europe. Japan has long taken a cautious stance after high-profile exchange failures earlier in the past decade, but officials now argue that clearer rules and stronger custody standards make broader participation possible without undermining investor protection.

Within government circles, 2026 is being framed as a symbolic inflection point. Lawmakers and regulators have increasingly referred to the year as a moment when legacy systems and digital infrastructure converge, particularly in capital markets settlement, identity verification and cross-border payments. Katayama described it as the start of a “digital era” for finance, a phrase that has been echoed in policy discussions tied to Japan’s broader digital transformation agenda.

Regulatory authority for any crypto-linked listings ultimately rests with the Financial Services Agency, which oversees exchanges and approves new financial products. The agency has already moved to modernise rules for security tokens and stablecoins, creating a framework that allows banks and trust companies to issue yen-backed digital currencies under strict supervision. Officials familiar with the discussions say the same principles—segregation of client assets, disclosure standards and market surveillance—would apply to crypto ETFs or similar instruments.

Market operators have begun preparing for that possibility. The Tokyo Stock Exchange’s parent group has invested heavily in trading and clearing systems capable of handling tokenised securities, while major brokerage houses are expanding digital asset teams to service institutional clients. Commodity exchanges have also explored how blockchain-based contracts could streamline settlement and reduce counterparty risk, particularly for energy and metals trading.

Japan’s interest in crypto-linked exchange products also reflects competitive pressure from regional peers. Hong Kong has positioned itself as a hub for virtual asset trading, approving spot crypto ETFs and encouraging global issuers to list in the city. Singapore, while more conservative on retail access, has built a reputation for regulatory clarity that attracts institutional capital. Policymakers in Tokyo are wary of ceding ground, especially as domestic pension funds and insurers look for diversified investment options in a low-yield environment.

Still, scepticism remains within Japan’s policy establishment. Some lawmakers and consumer groups warn that crypto markets remain volatile and vulnerable to manipulation, arguing that wider access through stock exchanges could expose unsophisticated investors to sharp losses. Regulators have responded by stressing that any approved products would likely be limited initially to professional investors, with strict marketing controls and suitability requirements.

Industry executives counter that regulated exchange-traded products may actually reduce risk by shifting activity away from offshore platforms toward transparent, supervised venues. They point to Japan’s experience with security tokens, where pilot issuances have proceeded without major incidents under a clear legal framework.

The debate has also revived questions about taxation and accounting. Crypto gains in Japan are currently taxed as miscellaneous income, a structure critics say discourages long-term investment and innovation. Government panels have been reviewing whether a shift toward capital gains treatment is warranted, particularly if digital assets become embedded in mainstream portfolios through ETFs and listed funds.

Food assistance funded by Japan is reaching refugees and returnees in Burundi through the World Food Programme, easing acute hunger pressures in camps and host communities strained by displacement, erratic harvests and rising food costs.

The support targets families who fled violence in neighbouring states and Burundians who have returned after years abroad, many arriving with limited assets and few income options. WFP officials say the funding is enabling monthly rations and nutrition support at a time when humanitarian needs remain elevated across the Great Lakes region.

The programme, implemented by the World Food Programme, prioritises refugees in camps and settlements as well as vulnerable returnees integrated into surrounding communities. Assistance includes staple cereals, pulses and fortified oil, with specialised supplements for pregnant and breastfeeding women and children at risk of malnutrition. Cash-based transfers are also being expanded where markets function, allowing households to choose foods locally and supporting small traders.

Japan’s contribution comes amid sustained displacement into Burundi, primarily from the eastern Democratic Republic of Congo, and a steady flow of returnees following regional diplomatic efforts. According to humanitarian agencies, Burundi hosts tens of thousands of refugees, while returnees often face land disputes, limited livelihoods and overstretched public services upon arrival. Food insecurity has been aggravated by climate variability that has disrupted planting seasons and by global price pressures that have raised the cost of basic staples.

A senior WFP official in Bujumbura said the Japanese funding was critical to stabilising rations and preventing harmful coping strategies such as skipping meals or pulling children out of school. “This support allows us to protect the most vulnerable while we scale solutions that build self-reliance,” the official said, noting that nutrition indicators had shown signs of strain in several camps before the funds were confirmed.

Japan has framed the assistance as part of its broader humanitarian engagement in Africa, with a focus on lifesaving aid and resilience. A representative of the Japanese government said the funding reflected a commitment to human security, adding that food assistance was paired with investments in health, water and education delivered through multilateral partners. Japan has been a long-standing donor to WFP operations worldwide, frequently emphasising efficiency and accountability.

Burundi’s government has welcomed the support, saying it complements national efforts to integrate refugees and returnees while maintaining social cohesion. Officials have encouraged aid agencies to align food assistance with agricultural recovery programmes so that communities can transition from relief to production. WFP has responded by linking rations to community assets projects and by sourcing food locally when possible, a move that shortens supply chains and injects cash into rural economies.

The assistance also intersects with protection efforts led by UNHCR, which coordinates shelter, registration and legal support for displaced populations. Aid agencies say synchronising food distributions with protection services has reduced tensions and improved access for women-headed households and people with disabilities. Monitoring systems track deliveries and outcomes to ensure aid reaches intended recipients.

Analysts caution that funding gaps persist across the humanitarian response in Burundi, where needs compete with crises elsewhere. While Japan’s contribution has stabilised a portion of WFP’s pipeline, agencies say predictable financing remains essential to avoid ration cuts later in the year. Market volatility and climate shocks continue to pose risks, underscoring the importance of flexible programming that can pivot between in-kind food and cash.

Plans to turn India into a major semiconductor manufacturing hub are moving from policy to execution, with four companies scheduled to begin chip production during 2026 and the government setting its sights on becoming one of the world’s leading producers by 2035. The transition marks a decisive phase for a country long dependent on imported chips but now seeking to embed itself in global electronics supply chains amid geopolitical realignments and rising demand for secure manufacturing bases.

The most advanced of the announced projects is the large-scale fabrication facility planned at Dholera in Gujarat, a joint venture between Tata Electronics and Taiwan’s Powerchip Semiconductor Manufacturing Corporation. The plant, cleared with government backing and financial incentives under the Semiconductor Mission, is designed to manufacture mature-node chips used in automobiles, power electronics, consumer devices and industrial equipment. Construction work has progressed through 2025, with commercial production targeted to start the following year, according to timelines shared with policymakers and industry partners.

Alongside the Dholera fab, three other facilities are slated to commence output in 2026, primarily in the assembly, testing, marking and packaging segment. Micron Technology’s ATMP plant at Sanand in Gujarat is expected to be the first major operational unit, focusing on memory products for global markets. Two domestic groups, Tata Electronics and Kaynes Semicon, are also developing advanced packaging facilities, while CG Power, in partnership with Japan’s Renesas Electronics and Thailand’s Stars Microelectronics, is setting up an outsourced semiconductor assembly and test unit in Gujarat. Together, these projects are intended to establish a foundational ecosystem rather than a single flagship plant.

Government officials argue that the emphasis on both fabrication and packaging reflects a deliberate strategy. While advanced-node fabs require decades of experience and heavy capital, mature-node manufacturing and packaging are seen as realistic entry points that align with India’s strengths in engineering talent, scale and cost efficiency. Officials involved in the programme say the objective is to capture value across the semiconductor chain while gradually building capabilities for more complex processes.

Public funding has played a central role. Under the incentive framework, the central government is offering support covering up to half the project cost for approved semiconductor and display manufacturing units, with additional incentives from host states. The total committed investment across approved projects runs into tens of billions of dollars, according to official estimates, making it one of the most capital-intensive industrial initiatives undertaken in the country.

Industry analysts note that the timing coincides with a global rethinking of chip supply chains. Disruptions during the pandemic years, coupled with trade and technology tensions, prompted governments and companies to seek diversified manufacturing locations. India’s pitch combines policy stability, a large domestic electronics market and strategic partnerships with established chipmakers. Executives at electronics firms say the presence of local chip production could shorten supply chains and reduce vulnerability to external shocks.

Challenges remain substantial. Semiconductor manufacturing demands ultra-reliable power, water and logistics, as well as a deep supplier base for chemicals, gases and equipment. Skills development is another constraint. While India produces large numbers of engineers, chip fabrication requires specialised expertise built through years of hands-on experience. To address this, training collaborations with overseas partners and academic institutions have been initiated, and several universities have launched semiconductor-focused programmes.

There is also scepticism about the 2035 ambition. Market researchers point out that becoming a “top” producer can be defined in different ways, whether by volume, value or technological sophistication. Countries such as Taiwan, South Korea and the United States dominate advanced-node manufacturing, while China has invested heavily across the value chain. India’s near-term projects focus on mature technologies, which serve vast markets but command lower margins. Supporters counter that demand for such chips is set to remain strong due to electric vehicles, renewable energy systems and industrial automation.

From December 2025 till March 2026, the bustling seasons present convergence of multiple spending needs for many households. Acknowledging that this might raise the need for flexible liquidity, AEON Bank provides a solution to address such budgetary constraints in the form of the PF-i; an inclusive, hassle-free financing facility, easily accessible via its digital banking app.

Optimising a Risk-Based Pricing (RBP) framework to determine a competitive and personalised profit rate, AEON Bank ensures that customers can seamlessly apply for PF-i online, as long as they are Malaysian citizens aged 18 to 55, with a minimum monthly gross income of RM2,500 – be it salaried employees or self-employed individuals, freelancers, as well as gig economy workers.

Aligned with Shariah banking principles, PF-i offers financing facility from RM1,000 up to RM100,000 with flexible tenure options ranging from 3 to 84 months, allowing for repayments tailored to individual budget needs. The Flat Profit Rate starting from 3.88% p.a. and a nominal Wakalah Fee of RM1 is applicable upon acceptance.

The entire process, from the application to fund disbursement are all managed online via the AEON Bank app. This simplifies the process and eliminates the need for physical paperwork or branch visits. To apply for PF-i, customers simply need to follow these steps :

• Step 1 : Activated Savings Account-i pre-requisite

Download the AEON Bank app and activate the Savings Account-i, prior to applying for PF-i.

• Step 2 : Eligibility check and employment details

Applicants must be Malaysian citizens aged 18 and above, earning a minimum monthly gross income of RM2,500 – either as salaried employees, self-employed or gig workers.

• Step 3 : Financing selection

Select the preferred financing amount ranging from RM1,000 up to RM100,000 and flexible repayment tenure, with options between 3 to 84 months.

• Step 4 : Supporting document submission

Upload the latest EPF (KWSP) statement, reflecting the latest consecutive 6-months contributions (for salaried workers) or latest consecutive 6-month bank statement (for self-employed/gig workers).

• Step 5 : Approval and fund disbursement

Applications will be processed immediately and upon approval, funds will be disbursed directly into the applicant’s AEON Bank Savings Account-i. Repayments will be automatically deducted via monthly auto-debit.

PF-i enables Malaysians to access a Shariah compliant financing facility to ease their needs; be it an emergency financial support, family budget constraint, small renovation, vehicle repair or a much needed financial aid to bridge the temporary cashflow gaps.

For comprehensive details on the Personal Financing-i (PF-i), including full terms and conditions, click here to browse the website and scan the QR Code to download the AEON Bank app: https://www.aeonbank.com.my/api/qr-handler

Hashtag: #AEONBank #DigitalBanking #IslamicDigitalBank #ShariahCompliant #FinancialInclusion #IslamicFintech #PersonalFinancing

https://www.aeonbank.com.my/
https://www.linkedin.com/company/aeonbankmy/?viewAsMember=true
https://x.com/aeonbankmy
https://www.facebook.com/aeonbankmalaysia
https://www.instagram.com/aeonbankmy

The issuer is solely responsible for the content of this announcement.

AEON Bank (M) Berhad

AEON Bank (M) Berhad is the first digital Islamic bank in Malaysia, licensed and regulated by Bank Negara Malaysia and the Ministry of Finance. Officially launched on 26 May 2024, we currently offer a suite of Shariah-compliant products and services under the Personal Banking and Business Banking (AEON Bank Biz).

Our Personal Banking offerings are 100% accessible via the AEON Bank app, namely the deposit Savings Account-i, AEON Bank x Visa Debit Card-i, Personal Financing-i, Term Deposit-i, Savings Pots, DuitNow QR, utility bill payments, personal financial management and budgeting tools with Neko Sensei, and a range of digital payment services with strategic partners and merchants, as well as Neko Missions, Malaysia’s first gamified digital banking interactive rewards programme.

On 8 August 2025, AEON Bank (M) Berhad officially launched AEON Bank Biz, anchored by the Current Business Account-i and integrated cash management capabilities, with the initial onboarding of vendors from AEON Credit Service (M) Berhad and suppliers within the broader AEON ecosystem. The targeted approach is designed to create an integrated value chain linking AEON’s retail and financial services networks, supporting strategic growth and greater inclusivity. AEON Bank Biz offers streamlined processes for account onboarding, credit assessments and financial services, utilising AI-driven fintech solutions to enable simplified procedures, faster approvals, and an enhanced digital banking experience for business owners and entrepreneurs. AEON Bank Biz’s products and services will soon be extended to more local businesses and entrepreneurs across Malaysia.

Being part of the AEON Group conglomerate, AEON Bank (M) Berhad is equally held by AEON Financial Service Co. Ltd. (AFS Japan) and AEON Credit Service (M) Berhad (ACSM). AFS Japan is responsible for the AEON Group’s financial services businesses, with strong roots in the retail sector which operates in Japan and 10 countries across Asia and it is. AEON Group is Japan’s largest retail group and it is a pure holding company that comprises eight core businesses.

AEON Group Malaysia consists of several entities, namely, AEON Co. (M) Bhd, AEON Credit Service (M) Berhad, AEON Bank (M) Berhad, AEON BiG (M) Sdn Bhd, AEON Fantasy (M) Sdn Bhd, AEON Delight (M) Sdn Bhd, AEON Global Supply Chain Sdn Bhd and Malaysian AEON Foundation (MAF). AEON Group has been a recognizable household brand with more than 200 years of history and evolution in Japan since the Edo era, along with 4 decades of growth in Malaysia, providing consumers with daily financial solutions and diversified retail convenience.

Our cloud native agility and AI optimisation, combined with the strength of our Shariah DNA, Malaysian roots and Japanese heritage are our distinguishing factors, while the integration with the AEON ecosystem gives us a competitive advantage of being the only bank in Malaysia with its own nationwide retail network. On top of that, AEON Points loyalty programme offers customers value-added benefits and meaningful rewards, as the AEON Points can be redeemed into cash value, deposited directly into customers’ AEON Bank Savings Account-i.

AEON Bank (M) Berhad is committed to provide accessible financial solutions for Malaysians and we aim to empower the community in pursuing their financial aspirations and achieve economic independence, hence fostering a more inclusive financial future for all. We will continue to contribute towards the Islamic banking development in the region and the nation’s digital economy.