New Delhi’s Jantar Mantar has become the centre of a sharp youth-led challenge to the government, with Cockroach Janta Party supporters extending their sit-in over exam scandals and unemployment while pressing for Union Education Minister Dharmendra Pradhan to resign.
The protest, now in its fourth day, has drawn students, job aspirants and young supporters of a movement that began as online satire and quickly turned into a street mobilisation. Demonstrators have slept at the protest site, banged steel plates with spoons, raised slogans and used humour as a political weapon against what they describe as a broken education and recruitment system.
The Cockroach Janta Party, or CJP, was launched by Abhijeet Dipke, a 30-year-old political communications strategist and Boston University student, after a Supreme Court judge’s remark comparing some jobless youth to “cockroaches” angered many young people. The group embraced the insult as a badge of survival, saying the term captured the resilience of a generation struggling with paper leaks, cancelled exams, high coaching costs and limited formal work opportunities.
Its rise has been unusually fast. The movement built a following of more than 22 million on Instagram within weeks, overtaking several established political handles and forcing parties across the spectrum to respond. Its supporters say that online reach is only the first stage, and the Jantar Mantar protest is intended to prove that digital anger can move into organised public action.
The immediate trigger is the NEET-UG 2026 controversy. More than two million candidates had to sit for a re-examination on 21 June after allegations that the original medical entrance test paper was compromised. The episode prompted extraordinary security measures, including biometric checks, heightened police presence and tighter monitoring of communication channels. Telegram was temporarily restricted after claims that leaked papers and fraudulent exam material were being circulated through the platform.
The National Testing Agency has said the re-examination was conducted under enhanced safeguards and has rejected claims that the fresh paper was leaked. It has warned students against fraudsters offering answer keys or question papers for money, while cybercrime officials have been asked to act against accounts spreading false claims. For many candidates, however, the distinction between confirmed leaks, fake leaks and administrative failure has done little to calm anger after months of uncertainty.
CJP supporters accuse the education ministry of failing to protect the integrity of high-stakes examinations that shape careers for millions of families. Their demand for Pradhan’s resignation has become the central slogan of the protest, though the movement’s wider language reaches beyond NEET. It links exam scandals with joblessness, inflation, expensive coaching centres and the feeling that young people are being asked to absorb the costs of institutional failure.
At Jantar Mantar, the movement’s theatrical style has been central to its visibility. The banging of plates echoed Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s 2020 appeal during the pandemic, when people were asked to honour frontline workers from balconies and rooftops. CJP used the same sound as protest, turning a familiar public ritual into a message of anger. Supporters have also called for symbolic actions such as diaper donations, using ridicule to keep attention on their demands.
Police have maintained a heavy presence around the protest site, using cameras and drones to monitor the gathering. Demonstrators have alleged that basic facilities were restricted as pressure mounted on them to leave, while organisers have said they will continue unless accountability is fixed. Dipke has told supporters that the movement is open to dialogue, but only after the education minister steps down.
The government has not accepted the demand for resignation. Officials have emphasised investigations, tighter safeguards and action against fraud networks. The dispute has nevertheless widened into a political issue, with opposition figures describing the CJP phenomenon as a signal of youth frustration while also arguing that lasting change must be carried through established political structures.
