News related to
Trump

Malaysia’s central bank has revised its economic growth forecast for 2025, citing increased volatility stemming from ongoing global trade tensions, notably those related to US tariffs. The Bank Negara Malaysia reduced its expected GDP growth to a range of 4% to 5%, down from an earlier projection of 5% to 5.5%. The adjustment comes as a response to the shifting dynamics of global trade, which have been exacerbated by the imposition of tariffs by the United States under the administration of President Donald Trump.

While Malaysia has been largely insulated from direct tariff measures, the broader implications of the US-China trade war and related tariffs have left a significant mark on its export-driven economy. Malaysia’s position as a key player in global supply chains has made it vulnerable to shifts in the global trade environment. The US tariffs, particularly on Chinese goods, have reverberated through Southeast Asia’s manufacturing sector, affecting Malaysia’s export performance and business sentiment.

BNM’s decision to cut the forecast reflects the broader concerns surrounding economic stability in the region. The central bank noted that the uncertainty surrounding US trade policy, particularly regarding its tariffs on various Chinese products, is likely to persist throughout 2025. Furthermore, the report highlighted the continued risks posed by rising protectionism and trade barriers globally, which have disrupted supply chains and added to market volatility.

In addition to the impact of tariffs, Malaysia’s central bank has also pointed to domestic factors influencing growth. These include higher inflationary pressures, mainly due to increased global commodity prices, which have had a knock-on effect on consumer spending. Malaysia’s key exports, such as palm oil, rubber, and electronic components, have all seen price fluctuations driven by external factors such as US tariffs and China’s economic slowdown.

The reduction in growth expectations comes at a time when Malaysia is also grappling with challenges in maintaining fiscal discipline. The government has pledged to reduce its budget deficit but has struggled to meet its revenue targets, further complicating the nation’s economic outlook. Malaysia’s reliance on exports, especially to major economies like the United States and China, has made it particularly sensitive to trade tensions. These developments have placed additional strain on the country’s fiscal policy, forcing the government to reconsider its growth strategies.

The central bank’s move is likely to have significant implications for Malaysia’s monetary policy. With inflation on the rise and external risks mounting, BNM may opt to adopt a more cautious stance in terms of interest rate adjustments. While the central bank has refrained from any immediate changes, economists expect that it will closely monitor both domestic and international developments, particularly as trade tensions show no sign of easing.

The challenges facing Malaysia’s economy are also compounded by global economic slowdowns, which have affected demand for Malaysian goods and services. As countries like the United States and China grapple with their own internal economic issues, Malaysia’s export markets have softened, leading to a reduced demand for its products. In particular, Malaysia’s electronics and semiconductor industries, which account for a significant portion of its exports, have faced headwinds as the US-China trade war has diverted global supply chains elsewhere.

Despite these challenges, the government remains optimistic about Malaysia’s long-term prospects. The country has made significant strides in diversifying its economy over the past few years, with a growing emphasis on technology, innovation, and sustainable development. Malaysia’s efforts to strengthen its digital infrastructure and promote industries such as e-commerce and renewable energy are seen as key to sustaining growth, even amid global trade disruptions.

A landmark federal framework for stablecoins became law on 18 July 2025, when President Donald Trump signed the Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for U. S. Stablecoins Act. The legislation mandates that stablecoins — digital currencies pegged one‑to‑one to the U. S. dollar or short‑term Treasury bills — must be fully backed by liquid reserves, publicly disclose holdings monthly, and comply with anti‑money laundering and consumer protection rules.

The Act clears a path for both banks and approved non‑bank entities to issue payment stablecoins under a dual licensing system, encompassing federal and state oversight. It also creates a formal category for such assets, offering legal clarity that had eluded stablecoin issuers until now.

Despite bipartisan support in Congress — with Senate approval on 17 June and House passage on 17 July — the new law has drawn criticism. Some lawmakers and experts argue it falls short on stricter anti‑money laundering measures and allows big tech firms to issue stablecoins with fewer regulatory hurdles than traditional banks.

Trump lauded the Act during the White House signing ceremony, calling it “a hell of an act” and asserting it will solidify American crypto leadership and support the dollar’s global primacy. He noted the GENIUS Act “creates a clear and simple regulatory framework” capable of unleashing innovation and enhancing payment systems.

Stakeholders across finance and fintech are re-evaluating their strategies. Traditional banks are preparing pilot programmes and exploring partnerships to issue or facilitate stablecoins, while crypto firms like Circle and Coinbase, which have backed U. S. stablecoin issuance earlier, have seen share prices rise following the law’s enactment.

In parallel, the law aims to channel demand into U. S. Treasuries, reinforcing the dollar’s global role. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent highlighted that requiring asset backing in government debt would deepen Treasury markets. Financial institutions are bracing for increased reserve purchases and adjustments in asset allocation strategies.

The Act introduces rigorous governance: stablecoin issuers must implement reserve audits, adhere to marketing restrictions—such as avoiding government endorsement claims—and prioritise redeeming customer claims ahead of other creditors in insolvency scenarios. It also extends anti‑money laundering obligations under the Bank Secrecy Act, granting treasury authorities power to freeze illicit funds.

Though heralded as a milestone, implementation remains complex. Regulators are expected to issue detailed rules within a year, and the Act’s “effective date” is projected for late 2026, contingent on final regulatory actions or an 18‑month grace period.

Global central banks and fintech players are watching closely. Some expect U. S. leadership in regulated digital currencies could spur innovation overseas, while others warn that insufficient guardrails may encourage regulatory arbitrage. Foreign issuers may enter the U. S. market if they meet rigorous Treasury approval, including comparable home‑jurisdiction oversight and U. S.-based reserve management.

Market response has been immediate: global crypto valuations have surged past $4 trillion, led by strong gains in bitcoin and ether amidst expectations of broader stablecoin integration. Industry experts suggest stablecoins may soon become mainstream payment tools, with major retailers and tech giants like Google, Uber and Apple exploring adoption.

However, voices of caution persist. Critics say the framework could permit big tech to bypass stricter banking regulations, heightening systemic risks, and that consumer safeguards remain inadequate. Transparency International warned the law might provide loopholes exploitable by criminals or hostile regimes.

As rule‑making proceeds and industry adapts, the GENIUS Act marks a fundamental shift in U. S. crypto policy — ushering stablecoins from regulatory limbo into a legalised, structured, but contested future.

The U. S. House of Representatives has approved the GENIUS Act, the inaugural federal regulatory framework targeting fiat‑backed stablecoins, with a decisive 308–122 bipartisan vote on 17 July 2025. With Senate approval secured in June by a 68–30 margin, the legislation now advances to President Trump’s desk for signature, anticipated as early as tomorrow.

The GENIUS Act mandates that issuers—including banks, credit unions, fintech firms, and select non‑bank entities—maintain one‑to‑one reserves in cash or low‑risk assets such as U. S. Treasury bills, with mandatory monthly public disclosures of reserve composition. It also institutes anti‑money laundering controls, requires issuance organisations to obtain licences from federal or state financial regulators, and prohibits paying interest directly to stablecoin holders.

The legislation forms part of a broader “Crypto Week” effort in the House, which also included passage of the CLARITY Act—allocating oversight of digital asset classification between the SEC and CFTC—and the Anti‑CBDC Surveillance State Act, barring the Federal Reserve from issuing a central bank digital currency. Both now await Senate consideration.

Advocates argue that the GENIUS Act addresses long-standing regulatory uncertainty, providing market stability and consumer safeguards within a $260 billion-plus stablecoin ecosystem. Senior figures from institutions such as JPMorgan Chase, Bank of America, Citi, Walmart, and Amazon have reportedly expressed interest in issuing stablecoins under the new regime. Market sentiment reflects optimism: crypto‑linked equities and assets rose when the House vote was finalised, with Bitcoin nearing record highs above $119,000.

Nonetheless, critics highlight significant concerns. Consumer advocates emphasise that stablecoins remain outside FDIC protection and could pose redemption risks or obscure hidden fees. Others express unease over potential weak guardrails: the SEC’s Paul Atkins cautioned that regulatory innovation must still ensure sufficient market safeguards.

Ethics debates spotlight former President Trump’s extensive ties to the crypto industry, including investments in World Liberty Financial and a meme coin touted as generating over $300 million in related revenues. Opponents claim this raises conflict‑of‑interest questions and risks favouring Trump‑linked enterprises, though the White House has asserted asset segregation via a family trust.

In Congress, both Democratic and Republican proponents defended the legislation for delivering much‑needed structure. Democratic Rep. Josh Gottheimer remarked that introducing “some rules of the road” was preferable to having none. Opposing voices like Rep. Maxine Waters cautioned that the law might “signal tolerance for corruption” without closing presidential exemptions from conflict‑of‑interest prohibitions. Meanwhile, Senate Democrats, including Richard Blumenthal, criticised the bill’s failure to eliminate loopholes or demand stronger consumer protection standards.

Beyond federal oversight, the GENIUS Act introduces a layered supervisory model: federal agencies will regulate larger issuers and interstate entities, while state regulators handle smaller players—those issuing under $10 billion annually. The legislation sets out implementation timelines, including one‑year deadlines for rule‑making and an 18‑month effective date, with a three‑year transition period before enforcement on custody and transaction restrictions.

Industry stakeholders anticipate dramatic market growth. Scott Bessent, Treasury secretary, projected the stablecoin market could swell from around $195 billion to over $2 trillion following the GENIUS Act’s implementation. Christian Catalini of the MIT Cryptoeconomics Lab predicted fierce competition as banks and fintechs join traditional issuers with consumer trust bolstered by regulation.

The crypto sector, stung by past regulatory setbacks under the prior administration’s enforcement actions, now views the GENIUS Act as a turning point. Major players like Circle and Coinbase backed the measure after directing substantial lobbying resources toward lawmakers. Jennifer Nolan, head of the Blockchain Association, described it as a “defining moment in the evolution of U. S. digital asset policy”.

With presidential signature expected imminently, the GENIUS Act is poised to redefine the U. S. approach to stablecoins—ushering in regulated issuance, enhanced transparency, and heightened institutional involvement. Its progress also spotlights ongoing debates about market oversight, political influence, and financial stability in an increasingly digital economy.

Bahrain’s Crown Prince Salman bin Hamad Al Khalifa has unveiled a $17 billion investment plan in the United States following a high-level meeting with President Donald Trump at the White House. The announcement signals deepening economic and strategic ties between Manama and Washington, with deals cutting across aviation, energy, and defence sectors.

A key feature of the plan includes a contract worth approximately $7 billion under which Gulf Air, Bahrain’s flag carrier, will purchase 12 Boeing aircraft. The agreement also includes an option for six additional planes and 40 aircraft engines from General Electric. The deal was presented as a tangible outcome of bilateral discussions, reinforcing Bahrain’s commitment to US industry and technology.

Crown Prince Salman described the deals as “real” and economically sound, addressing scepticism often associated with foreign investment pledges. The statement, made from the Oval Office, was aimed at highlighting the financial credibility of the agreements. “These aren’t fake deals,” he remarked, drawing a sharp contrast with previously publicised but unfulfilled investment promises by other nations.

The Bahraini leader’s Washington visit followed a similar pattern to President Trump’s earlier engagement with Saudi Arabia, during which over $600 billion in US investment commitments were secured. Trump had also finalised a $142 billion arms agreement with Riyadh. Bahrain’s announcement is now being viewed as a strategic move to bolster its position as a reliable economic and security partner of the United States.

The investment plan is expected to deliver significant economic dividends to both countries. For the US, the immediate impact would be in job creation, especially across Boeing’s manufacturing facilities and GE’s industrial operations. For Bahrain, the plan strengthens access to cutting-edge aviation technology and helps modernise its national infrastructure in both civil and defence aviation.

The timing of the announcement also reflects the evolving regional security dynamics in the Gulf. Iran’s influence and the broader geopolitical situation were key discussion points during the White House meeting. Bahrain, which hosts the US Navy’s Fifth Fleet, has remained a close military ally to Washington. The investment commitment not only serves economic purposes but also underscores Bahrain’s alignment with US strategic objectives in the Middle East.

Observers note that the choice of sectors—aviation, defence technology, and energy—signals Bahrain’s intent to link its national growth trajectory with American innovation and industrial capability. Gulf Air’s fleet expansion through Boeing jets and GE engines is viewed as a cornerstone of this agenda. Beyond the aviation component, additional investment is expected in energy-related projects and advanced technology, although specific agreements in these areas are yet to be publicly detailed.

The financial scope of the investment echoes previous patterns of engagement between Gulf monarchies and US administrations. Bahrain’s capital injection arrives amid growing competition among Gulf states seeking to secure American technological partnerships and defence cooperation, while positioning themselves as key regional intermediaries.

For President Trump, who had prioritised foreign investment in US manufacturing and defence during his tenure, the $17 billion figure plays into the broader narrative of restoring domestic industrial capacity through global alliances. It also fits into the administration’s push for balancing trade relationships and encouraging allies to contribute more significantly to US economic interests.

Strategic analysts have pointed out that the Gulf kingdom’s outreach comes at a time when regional alliances are undergoing shifts. Bahrain has been at the forefront of some of the Arab world’s diplomatic realignments, including its role in the Abraham Accords. The alignment with US economic and security goals could further consolidate its position as a trusted partner in American foreign policy planning for the Gulf.

Crown Prince Salman’s visit marked the continuation of a trend where Middle Eastern states use bilateral state visits to announce substantial investment projects. These announcements serve dual purposes: generating domestic political capital for US leaders while allowing foreign partners to project influence and economic modernisation.

Washington policymakers have signalled approval of the deals, suggesting that the partnership with Bahrain could deepen further in sectors such as infrastructure development, cyber-security, and military training. While the specifics of such cooperation are yet to materialise in binding agreements, the tone from both capitals points toward an expanding strategic partnership.

The Indian rupee weakened further against the UAE dirham, trading at approximately ₹23.36-23.40 per dirham amid a stronger US dollar and heightened global trade tensions. This decline continues the trend from earlier in the month, providing a beneficial window for expatriates in the Gulf remitting funds home.

Market pressures stemmed from fresh US tariff threats under President Trump, triggering broader dollar appreciation and weighing on emerging-market currencies. The dollar index hovered near 98, while US non-deliverable forwards priced in a rupee rate around ₹85.90-86 per dollar.

Currency exchange houses in Dubai report a steep drop in the rupee–dirham rate. It has fallen from around ₹23.29-23.30 recently to lows of ₹23.36-23.40. Analysts suggest the trend may extend to ₹23.50 or possibly ₹23.60, especially if additional US tariffs are imposed on broader trade partners without a trade deal with India.

Financial managers in Dubai believe that non‑resident Indian workers are taking advantage of these levels. One treasury manager anticipates further rupee weakness until India finalises any trade arrangements with the US. Exchange-house sources confirm a decline in remittances during July—attributed partly to summer holidays—but note an uptick in transfers as expatriates act on the current exchange rates.

The backdrop of US trade policy remains a significant influence. US announcements of 30% tariffs on EU and Mexico imports effective August 1, and potential large levies on BRICS nations, have contributed to dollar strength and weighing on Asian currencies including the rupee. Although India has not yet received formal tariff notices, market participants are interpreting ongoing trade rhetoric as negotiating tactics, cushioning immediate currency volatility.

A weakened rupee benefits remitters, who can convert savings at more favourable rates. Gulf-based exchange officials report NRIs are actively sending funds home wherever possible. One senior official described a notable spike in AED‑INR transactions when the rate hit ₹23.50, marking the lowest point since early April.

Typically, remittance volumes dip in summer due to travel and expenses, yet this year’s trend bucks the seasonal norm. An Economic Times analysis notes a sustained surge in fund transfers since mid‑June, with industry sources commenting: “Last Thursday was one of the best days in recent weeks for AED‑INR remittances”.

Analysts emphasize that the current remittance window aligns with forex volatility and the dollar’s rally—driven by global trade uncertainty and safe‑haven demand. Surprisingly, gold, not the dollar, has been the primary beneficiary of geopolitics in recent weeks, offering an unusual twist in safe‑asset flows.

Looking ahead, significant factors likely to influence the rupee–dirham rate include the trajectory of US-India trade talks, the rollout of any new American tariffs, and global investor risk appetite. Should a US‑India agreement emerge, the rupee could stabilise or recover; however, absent any deal, dollar strength may persist.

For expatriates in the Gulf, the current divergence between weaker rupee and firmer dollar represents a strategic opportunity. With the potential for rupee to decline further, remittances increase the value of transfers sent home in the near term.

Oil traded in a narrow range as tariffs and sanctions threats unsettled global markets, weighing heavily on the outlook for energy demand. Brent hovered just above $70 a barrel, while West Texas Intermediate stayed above $68. Futures markets weakened as U. S. equity-index futures dropped following fresh trade tensions between Washington and key global partners.

U. S. President Donald Trump escalated tariff threats, targeting both the European Union and Mexico with 30 per cent duties and flagging potential levies against Brazil, the Philippines, Japan, South Korea and others. Markets interpreted this as a risk to economic momentum, especially in energy‑sensitive regions of Asia, denting crude demand expectations. At the same time, Asian buyers adopted a cautious stance, amplifying downward pressure on oil.

Against this backdrop, investors are eyeing a scheduled “major statement” from President Trump concerning Russia. Anticipation of new sanctions against the country, a major oil producer, lent modest support to prices that might otherwise have fallen further. Still, this support was checked by rising output from OPEC+ and a pause in geopolitical flare-ups in the Middle East.

Data from the International Energy Agency signals that global oil markets remain relatively tight. Summer driving seasons and increased refinery activity have buoyed demand, although analysts note that elevated output from Saudi Arabia—above its OPEC+ quota—puts a dent in any sustained rally. The kingdom disputes claims of non‑compliance, stating marketed crude remains within agreed limits.

Market watchers also flag OPEC+ plans to hike production by approximately 548,000 barrels per day in August, potentially followed by another boost in September. ING warns these moves could put the market into surplus in the final quarter of 2025. Additionally, the group revised its global demand forecasts downward for 2026–29, citing weakening growth in China.

Further clouding the outlook, heightened tariff uncertainty is exerting macroeconomic drag. The IEA forecasts a meaningful drop in global oil consumption growth for 2025, down a third from earlier projections, due in part to Trump’s tariff measures. Analysts stress that inflationary pressures and slower global trade would dampen energy demand.

From a logistical standpoint, renewed Houthi tensions in the Red Sea have introduced another variable, interrupting shipping and supporting prices marginally. Still, Middle East volatility has largely receded compared with levels seen earlier this year.

Looking ahead, market players are set to digest a blend of geopolitical and macroeconomic signals. Key Chinese trade figures due soon may reveal shifts in demand. OPEC+ decisions on output will be scrutinised closely, as will the next moves in Washington’s trade and sanctions policy. Meanwhile, U. S. gasoline consumption remains robust, with the Energy Information Administration reporting a 6 per cent increase to 9.2 million barrels per day—signalling that underlying demand has not yet faltered.

Oil markets are caught between supportive fundamentals—such as strong summer demand, supply constraints from Russia and geopolitical flare‑ups—and sobering headwinds from proposed tariffs, elevated output and macroeconomic uncertainty. Traders remain cautious, awaiting concrete policy developments from Washington, data releases from China, and steps by OPEC+ to navigate a market landscape that is anything but stable.

Oil prices have shifted sharply this week, with demand forecasts now under pressure from escalating trade tensions fuelled by fresh tariffs. Brent crude is trading in the high‑60s per barrel, while benchmark WTI hovers around mid‑60s, reflecting growing investor caution. Analysts point to revised supply and demand projections as indicators of a changing market landscape.

An International Energy Agency monthly report has cut its global oil‑demand growth forecast for 2025 to 700,000 bpd, the slowest pace since 2009 outside the pandemic, down from 720,000 bpd last month. The downgrade reflects weaker consumption in emerging markets and a cooling US‑China trade outlook. Supply continues to outpace demand as OPEC+ ramps up production; global output in June rose by about 950,000 bpd to reach 105.6 mbpd.

The IEA notes the oil market remains technically in surplus, with inventories building globally—even as regional stock draws persist. Oil runs at refineries have slowed, particularly in the US and China, enabling downward revisions in demand projections. Enverus Intelligence Research offers a counter‑view, pointing to balanced OECD inventories and sustained summer demand north of 1 mbpd, which may support higher prices.

The US Energy Information Administration expects US crude oil production to plateau at roughly 13.4 mbpd in 2025, dropping modestly later this year as lower prices curb drilling activity. Despite this, producers remain vulnerable to profit erosion unless prices stabilise in the $65–70 range.

President Trump’s trade moves have reignited fears of another global trade war, with new tariff letters dispatched to Brazil, South Korea, Japan, the Philippines and others this week. Threats of 50% duties on exports such as copper, semiconductor components and auto parts are weighing heavily on commodity‑linked equity markets and raising recession risk concerns. Oil prices dropped more than 2% on Thursday as benchmark futures responded to the potential hit to economic growth.

While some market participants remain in “wait‑and‑see” mode, given Trump’s unpredictability and history of policy reversals, the overarching effect is to dampen demand forecasts. Onyx Capital’s head of research, Harry Tchilinguirian, cautions against overreaction but acknowledges that tariffs are adding to inflationary pressures and may reinforce Federal Reserve caution.

Geopolitical flashpoints in the Middle East continue to influence sentiment. Oil surged in June as Iran threatened to close the Strait of Hormuz, which handles almost 20% of world oil shipments, but prices eased once the waterway remained open. Meanwhile, Saudi Arabia raised official prices to consumers, citing strong demand in China’s post‑pandemic recovery, though refiners are reporting margin squeezes.

Financial institutions have started to reflect this shifting environment in their projections. A Reuters‑polled group of 40 analysts revised Brent average forecasts for 2025 to $67.86 per barrel—up marginally from May—while predicting demand growth of only around 730,000 bpd. JP Morgan cut its annual Brent estimate to $66, citing rising OPEC+ output and sluggish consumption. TD Economics trimmed its forecast further, expecting 2025 WTI to average near $62, warning of sustained downward pressure from trade risk and oversupply.

Two factors loom large over the coming months. First, the path of trade tensions: further tariff escalations or retaliatory actions could erode industrial activity and fuel sales. Second, OPEC+ strategy: with the bloc unconstrained in raising output, additional production could overwhelm tepid demand, pushing prices below current levels. The IEA projects supply growth for 2025 at 2.1 mbpd, while demand is seen rising just 700 kbpd.

On the financial front, hedge fund positioning has turned cautious, registering the sharpest drop in bullish sentiment since February. Traders are forecasting narrower price ranges ahead, with elevated volatility as tariff developments hit market headlines.

Forward‑looking forecasts remain mixed. EIA projects Brent to average $68.89 in 2025 and $58.48 in 2026, marking a seasonal decline. Enverus suggests the upside remains intact if demand holds steady, especially with summer driving season underway. Market watchers also note that rising gas‑to‑oil switching costs, refinery restarts and diminished spare capacity could temper price declines.

China’s consumption is also under scrutiny. While Beijing seeks to stimulate growth through fiscal and monetary tools, investor sentiment remains fragile. Saudi’s decision to push prices higher was based on perceived strengthening in Chinese demand, but many analysts caution that any slow‑down could rapidly tip the balance.

Emerging long‑term trends offer some balance. IEA’s long‑term outlook suggests oil demand will continue rising through the late 2020s, driven by non‑OECD economies and slower clean‑energy adoption, delaying peak demand beyond 2030. Nonetheless, short‑term price direction seems firmly tied to macroeconomic risks and geopolitical dynamics.