News related to
Gaza

U.S. President Donald Trump has announced a “complete and total” ceasefire between Israel and Iran, set to begin within hours, marking what he described as the end of a 12‑day war. The plan envisages Iran initiating a 12‑hour ceasefire, followed by a reciprocal Israeli hiatus, concluding with a full cessation of hostilities.

Trump’s statement on his social media platform outlined a phased process: Iran will commence the ceasefire after winding down its final missions, followed by Israel 12 hours later, and after 24 hours the war will be declared over. He praised both nations for their “stamina, courage, and intelligence” and characterised the agreement as a significant step towards lasting peace.

The announcement follows a dramatic escalation in regional tensions. Israel launched military strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities in response to Iran’s uranium enrichment activities. Tehran retaliated by firing up to 14 missiles at the U.S.-operated Al Udeid Air Base in Qatar. While 13 were intercepted and one deviated off course, no U.S. personnel were harmed—a fact President Trump described as a “very weak response.”

Despite global concerns over escalation, including warnings from France and other Western capitals, market responses have remained muted. Oil prices dropped approximately 7% in anticipation of de‑escalation, while equity markets posted modest gains.

Though the ceasefire announcement has generated optimism, it remains unverified by Israeli or Iranian leaders. As of now, neither government has publicly confirmed their commitment to the arrangement. Al Jazeera noted the absence of official statements from both sides.

The U.S. role in brokering this agreement highlights Trump’s assertive posture. He denied prior suggestions that France’s Emmanuel Macron had brokered such a deal, countering that the ceasefire plan was “much bigger than that.” Analysts warn that trust between Israel and Iran remains fragile, requiring robust verification mechanisms and potentially third-party monitoring to sustain the fragile peace.

European diplomats, including those from France, Germany and the UK, have previously urged for de‑escalation after U.S. strikes, facilitating a clash of diplomacy and military brinkmanship. Trump has also floated the prospect of regime change in Iran under the slogan “Make Iran Great Again,” sparking concerns about the endgame and durability of U.S. involvement.

In Washington, debate has emerged regarding U.S. aims. Trump’s advisors say the administration does not seek regime change, yet the use of the slogan and his rhetoric suggests otherwise. Critics warn that pushing Iran into further isolation could spark domestic instability in Tehran.

Regions across the Gulf remained on high alert during the conflict. Airspace closures in Qatar, Bahrain, and Kuwait affected international travel. Qatar has since reopened its skies following coordination with regional authorities. Countries in the region—Saudi Arabia, the UAE, and France included—expressed deep concern and reinforced calls for dialogue and restraint.

Security analysts note that the potential for a broader conflagration, particularly in the Strait of Hormuz, persisted until the ceasefire announcement. Iran’s parliamentary body had discussed strategic deterrents, including the possibility of closing the strait, a move that could severely disrupt global oil supplies. The upcoming hours will be decisive in determining whether the ceasefire is respected or if underlying tensions reignite.

The absence of casualties on either the U.S. or Israeli side contrasts with reported losses in Iran and Israel. Israeli strikes reportedly killed several hundred Iranians, including Revolutionary Guard members, while Iran was testing its limited retaliatory capabilities.

Infrastructure damage in both nations has been notable though not crippling. On the Iranian side, Tehran’s Evin prison and Revolutionary Guard sites bore the brunt of Israeli air raids; on the Israeli side, civilian infrastructure has remained largely intact, shielded by missile defence systems such as Iron Dome.

Stock markets and global commodity prices will closely monitor the ceasefire’s implementation. Should it hold, analysts suggest stability may regain foothold and prices may further retreat. However, any violation could push markets back into turmoil.

Diplomatically, Europe appears keen to reaffirm diplomatic channels. The EU and UN are reportedly preparing statements urging verification and offering mediation. Russia and China have also urged parties to uphold the ceasefire and avoid widening the conflict.

The next 24 hours are critical. The phased ceasefire hinges on mutual restraint and credible enforcement measures. U.N. observers or allied forces may be deployed to Tehran and Tel Aviv to verify compliance. Confirmation of Iran’s opening of its airspace and Israel’s military stand‑down orders will be key signals.

Israeli Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich has ordered the cancellation of a decades‑long indemnity that shields Israeli banks when processing shekel transactions for Palestinian counterparts, a move poised to disrupt salaries, imports and basic services across the West Bank and Gaza.

The directive, issued on 10 June 2025, halts a waiver that permitted Israeli financial institutions to facilitate payments to the Palestinian Authority and local customers without fear of legal consequences. Analysts warn this could sever Palestinian banks’ vital access to the larger Israeli banking system.

Palestinian Monetary Authority officials cautioned that this severance would seriously impede operations such as payments for food, fuel, electricity and water. In 2023 alone, around 53 billion shekels—equivalent to $15.2 billion—passed through Palestinian banking corridors. The revocation of the indemnity risks plunging the territories into a fragile cash‑only system, heightening exposure to theft, fraud and illicit activity.

Smotrich’s decision follows sanctions by the UK, Canada, Australia, New Zealand and Norway imposing asset freezes and travel bans on him and National Security Minister Itamar Ben‑Gvir, citing their roles in incitement and human rights abuses in the West Bank and Gaza. Smotrich maintains the waiver withdrawal is a justified response to what he terms the Palestinian Authority’s “delegitimisation campaign” against Israel.

For decades, Palestinian banking operated without central‑bank autonomy or national currency. Reliance on Israeli shekels and correspondent banking agreements has been critical. International voices—including US Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen, G7 officials and the UN—have repeatedly warned that ending this arrangement could trigger a humanitarian crisis and violate international law.

Local analysts predict the measures will exacerbate an already deteriorating economic landscape. Kristin Ronzi of intelligence firm Rane Network said abolishing this financial collaboration will “impede the Palestinian Authority’s ability to import basic, essential goods such as food and fuel,” likely deepening economic hardship and undermining public sentiment.

The Palestinian banking system, which exceeds 100 % of GDP, is particularly vulnerable to spill‑over effects from Gaza into the West Bank, according to IMF data. The termination of the waiver is feared to amplify credit constraints on private and public sectors alike, risking reduced lending, increased borrowing costs, and even defaults.

International stakeholders, including the US and G7, had pressed for short‑term extensions of the indemnity. Those appeals often hinged on warnings that a collapse of Palestinian financial networks would destabilise trade, delay crucial services, and potentially fuel militant groups reliant on cash economies.

Smotrich is known for his hardline positions: he has previously withheld Israeli-tax clearance revenues and blocked aid in retaliation for moves supportive of Palestinian statehood. In May 2025, he warned publicly that Gaza “will be totally destroyed,” vowing to push Palestinians toward resettlement in other countries.

Within Israel, there is evident friction. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and some coalition members support Smotrich, but others fear political and economic backlash—particularly amid international outrage and concern over deepening the Gaza violence. The policy must still pass through Israel’s security cabinet before implementation begins.

Across Palestinian chambers in Ramallah and Gaza City, there is growing anxiety. Authorities are scrambling to negotiate with donors, international NGOs and Middle Eastern allies, in hopes of constructing contingency plans. Proposed measures include alternative cash corridors, increased use of digital currencies, and humanitarian exemptions—but none currently matches the scale of the existing system.

Economists warn the broader consequences of this rupture—the Palestinian economy has already lost billions amid conflict. Since October 2023, Gaza’s economy shrank by 61 %, the West Bank by 24 %, and joblessness soared to around 57 % across both territories. Analysts fear the banking clamp‑down could invert years of fragile recovery efforts, worsening poverty and political instability.

Two Arab-Israeli tourists have been handed lengthy prison sentences by a South Sinai court following their conviction in the fatal stabbing of an Egyptian tour guide at a Red Sea resort, a verdict that has drawn international attention against the backdrop of heightened regional hostilities.

The ruling, delivered on Saturday, found the two individuals guilty of intentionally killing the Egyptian national during a confrontation at a beach resort in the city of Nuweiba. Prosecutors had charged them with premeditated murder and carrying out an attack that endangered public safety. According to court filings and officials familiar with the proceedings, the incident occurred during a heated altercation which quickly escalated into violence, leaving the guide with multiple stab wounds that proved fatal at the scene.

The defendants, both Arab citizens of Israel, were on a holiday trip to Egypt when the incident unfolded. Their legal defence argued the act was not premeditated, claiming it stemmed from a misunderstanding over personal comments made during a beachside discussion. However, the court was unconvinced by the self-defence narrative, citing forensic evidence and eyewitness testimony suggesting the attack was both aggressive and deliberate. One of the convicted was sentenced to life imprisonment, while the second received a fifteen-year sentence, with both verdicts subject to appeal under Egyptian law.

The sentencing has reignited discourse over the complex social and political positioning of Arab-Israelis in the region, particularly as travel restrictions and diplomatic sensitivities fluctuate in response to the Israel-Gaza conflict. Although tourism between Egypt and Israel has historically persisted even through periods of regional instability, this case is likely to deepen anxieties on both sides. Security analysts and diplomats warn of a growing unease among Arab visitors from Israel, who are increasingly viewed through a geopolitical lens rather than a civilian one, especially in politically tense zones like the Sinai Peninsula.

This is not the first time tensions have flared in Egyptian resorts involving tourists from across the border. The Red Sea, a destination traditionally known for its seclusion from regional politics, has seen intermittent flashpoints. However, the escalation of Israel’s military operations in Gaza since October has placed local authorities on high alert. Security has been significantly tightened in Sinai, with additional checks implemented on cross-border travellers.

The Egyptian judiciary’s firm stance on the case has also been interpreted as an attempt to send a signal of internal order at a time of external pressure. Cairo has been balancing domestic outrage over developments in Gaza with its longstanding peace agreement with Israel, while also maintaining its role as a mediator in ceasefire negotiations and humanitarian efforts.

Observers note that while the legal outcome aligns with Egypt’s existing penal code concerning intentional homicide, the broader implications may resonate more in the political and diplomatic spheres than in the legal domain. Civil society voices in Israel have expressed concern that the verdict could fuel existing prejudice against Arab citizens within the country and complicate their movements across the region. Human rights advocates have also raised questions about the legal representation afforded to the defendants and the degree of diplomatic support extended to them during their incarceration and trial.

On the Egyptian side, there has been a marked effort by state-aligned media to highlight the judiciary’s independence and the rule of law. The attack, which drew public outrage among local residents and workers in the hospitality sector, was described as a senseless act that endangered the country’s vital tourism industry—a key economic pillar already under strain due to declining visitor numbers in parts of Sinai.

Egypt’s Ministry of Tourism has reiterated that the Sinai coast remains safe for tourists, while noting that isolated incidents of violence, though rare, are treated with the utmost seriousness. Tourism operators, particularly in South Sinai, are also re-evaluating visitor protocols in light of the incident, with discussions underway about potential guidelines for managing cultural or political disputes among international guests.

The verdict comes at a moment when Israel’s war in Gaza has pushed regional sensitivities to a boiling point, with a significant uptick in diplomatic fallout, public protests, and strained bilateral engagements. Although Egyptian officials have not directly linked the court’s decision to the ongoing hostilities, analysts note that public sentiment in Egypt has been heavily influenced by the humanitarian toll in Gaza, which may indirectly affect the social environment for visitors perceived to be aligned with the conflict.

This incident highlights the fragile line separating tourism from geopolitics in the Middle East. While both Egypt and Israel maintain open travel channels under their decades-long peace treaty, the practical implications of regional conflict are becoming more visible at individual levels. Arab citizens of Israel, already navigating complex identities within Israel, are now finding themselves subject to heightened scrutiny abroad.

Legal experts say the defence may challenge the procedural aspects of the trial or appeal on grounds of intent classification, though such efforts may be hindered by the current climate and the strong forensic evidence submitted during hearings. The Egyptian penal system allows for appeals on both procedural and substantive grounds, and any modification to the sentence would need to pass through multiple judicial reviews.

The jailed individuals are currently being held in a high-security detention centre in South Sinai, where they are expected to remain unless the appeal courts intervene. The Israeli consular presence in Egypt has yet to issue a detailed comment on the sentencing, though officials have confirmed that consular support is being provided.