News related to
Gaza

Dubai Airports has announced an extended 10-year strategy aimed at transforming Dubai International and Dubai World Central – Al Maktoum into the world’s most accessible and inclusive airports by 2035. The plan underscores a shift from enhancing infrastructure alone to driving cultural change, embedding empathy and user-centred design in every element of the passenger journey.

The strategy rests on three pillars: reinforcing existing accessibility frameworks, improving guest experience across every touchpoint, and elevating the airports’ status as global benchmarks in inclusive aviation. The commitment aligns with the UAE’s broader obligations to support the rights of People of Determination and Dubai’s ambition to become a disability-friendly city.

Majed Al Joker, Chief Operating Officer of Dubai Airports, emphasised that accessibility is a “core pillar” rather than a peripheral initiative. He noted that, for the first time, the airport authority is co-creating programmes with the PoD community to redesign the passenger journey from their lived perspective. The launch coincides with the debut of a public awareness campaign called “DXB for All”, which presents six narratives of travellers with sensory sensitivities, mobility challenges, hearing or visual impairments, and highlights their airport experiences.

This new phase builds on the 2022 “We All Meet the World Differently” campaign. While that initiative focused primarily on raising awareness, the current strategy delves deeper by integrating accessibility into operations, staff training, and passenger interactions. Airport operators intend to cultivate empathy across staff, travellers, and the public, encouraging all stakeholders to reframe how they engage with PoD.

To facilitate inclusive travel, Dubai Airports already provides a suite of services: a Travel Planner visual guide, the Sunflower Lanyard to signal discreet assistance, free two-hour parking, dedicated taxis, wheelchair support from curb to gate, over 520 hearing loops across terminals, and a sensory-friendly Assisted Travel Lounge in Terminal 2. These measures will be expanded and refined under the new strategy.

The initiative is being deployed through the “oneDXB” partnership network, which includes Emirates, flydubai, Dubai Police, GDIFA, Dubai Customs, dnata, Dubai Health, Dubai Duty Free, Serco, and other stakeholders. The collaborative structure ensures that airport services, security, passenger handling, health and taxi operations all align with inclusivity goals.

Challenges are considerable. DXB is already operating near capacity: in 2024 it handled 92.3 million passengers, its highest ever annual volume. That puts pressure on space, queueing, and infrastructure to adapt without undermining operational efficiency. Meanwhile, DWC is undergoing significant expansion—with a projected $35 billion investment to scale it toward handling up to 260 million passengers annually. Dubai Airports plans to shift major operations to DWC by 2032, adding urgency to ensuring that new terminals and systems are fully accessible from the start.

Hamas has announced that it will free the final Israeli hostages taken in its October 2023 assault on Israel, but insisted that other elements of a U. S.-backed 20-point peace plan remain subject to negotiation, leaving the path ahead fraught with uncertainty. President Donald Trump welcomed the announcement, calling for an immediate halt to Israeli bombardment and offering indications that he might allow flexibility on the broader proposal.

Under the deal endorsed by Israel, all hostages—alive and deceased—are to be returned within 72 hours of Israel’s public acceptance, in exchange for the release of around 1,950 Palestinian detainees. The agreement envisages a phased Israeli withdrawal, transfer of Gaza’s administrative functions to apolitical technocrats, and demilitarization of Hamas. But Hamas has declined to commit to disarmament, signalling that parts of the plan will undergo further negotiation.

Trump, in a public message, said Israel “must immediately stop” its bombing of Gaza and asserted that he believed Hamas was “ready for lasting peace.” He also warned that failure to accept the terms by the deadline—Sunday at 6 p. m. Eastern Time—would provoke severe consequences. Israel has given tentative backing to the first phase of the plan, though it maintains reservation about Hamas’s retention of weapons.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has accepted the peace initiative in principle but imposed caveats: Israel’s withdrawal will be partial, and Gaza will remain under strong security oversight. Netanyahu rejected formation of a Palestinian state under this framework, warning that such a move would reward terrorism. He has also suggested that Hamas participants who commit to peaceful transition could be granted amnesty.

Egypt, Qatar and other regional powers are acting as intermediaries to push Hamas toward acceptance. Israeli officials have reportedly reduced ground operations in Gaza City following U. S. pressure, instructing troops to limit activities to defensive operations even as the air campaign continues. Meanwhile, humanitarian groups warn that any ceasefire in name must be accompanied by unimpeded aid delivery and infrastructure repairs.

Some opposition voices in Israel—particularly among far-right coalition partners—view the latest developments as insufficient, demanding continued military pressure. Families of hostages have expressed cautious optimism, although they remain sceptical of open-ended guarantees.

In Hamas’s statement, the group claimed that the hostage release marks a gesture of “good faith,” but stressed that Israel’s withdrawal, guarantees on the safety of Gaza’s population, and the future role of Palestinian governance must be negotiated further. It described disarmament as “off the negotiating table” and refused to accept unconditional terms.

Analysts caution that the hostages’ release, while important, does not resolve deep structural issues: the role of Hamas in governance, security guarantees for Israel, and Gaza’s long-term reconstruction remain unresolved. Regional watchers view the moment as the most significant opening for a potential ceasefire in years—but one that may collapse without strict adherence to implementation timelines and third-party oversight.

International leaders have responded with varying tones. Some support the deal as a rare breakthrough, while others urge caution, calling for clear mechanisms to enforce demilitarization and civilian protections. The United Nations has reiterated its demand for accountability under international law and its role in aid operations.

By K Raveendran The global oil market is once again caught between geopolitics and fundamentals, as a new set of developments forces traders, producers, and consumers to recalibrate expectations. With the United States and the European Union signalling a hardening of positions on Russian oil, and with the Middle East simmering in heightened tensions, Brent […]

The article World Oil Flows At A Critical Juncture As India, US Try To Hammer Out A Deal appeared first on Latest India news, analysis and reports on Newspack by India Press Agency).

A senior aide to Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has been dispatched to the United Arab Emirates in a discreet diplomatic move aimed at resolving strains between the two nations. This development marks a critical step in addressing the ongoing challenges faced by the UAE-Israel relationship, particularly in the aftermath of regional shifts and political tensions.

The aide’s visit, which has been kept under wraps to avoid further complicating the delicate diplomatic situation, underscores Israel’s desire to reassert its relations with the UAE following some setbacks in the past year. While the specifics of the discussions remain largely confidential, sources suggest the key focus is on reaffirming the normalization of ties, which was first achieved through the Abraham Accords in 2020. These accords established full diplomatic relations between Israel and the UAE, a historic shift in the Middle East, and the Netanyahu administration has been under pressure to maintain the momentum of these agreements despite regional turbulence.

Diplomatic sources point to a combination of political disagreements, security concerns, and international pressures that have strained the UAE-Israel partnership. One of the main issues is the growing unease in the Gulf over Israel’s stance on Palestinian issues and its handling of tensions in Gaza. While the UAE has remained committed to the Abraham Accords, there has been mounting public and political disquiet over Israel’s domestic policies, especially in relation to its stance on Palestinian sovereignty and peace efforts.

Experts suggest that Netanyahu’s decision to send a trusted aide is a direct response to growing concerns in Abu Dhabi about Israel’s domestic trajectory and its regional posture. This diplomatic outreach is seen as a move to reassure the UAE that Israel remains committed to cooperation, particularly in areas such as trade, technology, and security, which have flourished since the signing of the Abraham Accords.

There is speculation that the UAE has been considering a recalibration of its foreign policy, especially with the changing dynamics in the broader Middle East. With the shifting alliances and new players emerging in the region, including the growing influence of China and Russia, the UAE finds itself needing to maintain a balance between its Western ties, particularly with the United States, and its more recent alignment with Israel.

The UAE-Israel relationship, though officially cordial, has been fraught with complexities. The leadership in Abu Dhabi has long prioritised stability and economic growth, factors which drove the decision to engage diplomatically with Israel. However, regional developments, including the ongoing situation in Gaza and the broader Israeli-Palestinian conflict, have put these relations to the test.

Israel’s efforts to build and sustain relationships with Gulf states have been a key feature of Netanyahu’s foreign policy. The normalization agreements brokered by the Trump administration in 2020 were seen as a major victory for Israel, but they have not been without their challenges. The UAE has been wary of the potential fallout from these ties, particularly in the Arab world, where public sentiment on Israel remains divided.

Despite these challenges, there is a shared interest in several areas. Both countries are looking to advance economic collaborations, particularly in the fields of technology, energy, and defence. Israeli businesses have already established a foothold in the UAE, with cooperation extending to key sectors such as cybersecurity and artificial intelligence. These partnerships are expected to grow further as both nations seek to capitalise on new opportunities.

Israel’s relationship with the UAE has also allowed for greater security cooperation, particularly in the context of regional threats posed by Iran. Both countries share concerns over Iran’s nuclear ambitions and its influence across the region. This shared security interest has provided a basis for increased intelligence-sharing and military coordination, despite the undercurrent of political tensions.

A joint alert from seven United Nations agencies has flagged Gaza’s fuel stocks as critically depleted, imperilling vital services for its 2.1 million residents. With fuel supplies down to a scarce trickle, health care, water, sanitation, aid distribution and communications infrastructures are faltering.

Hospitals such as Al‑Shifa in Gaza City have begun rationing fuel, placing patients in life-threatening situations. Doctors report incubators and dialysis equipment may fail within hours, while oxygen generators are sputtering. Ambulances have stalled, forcing staff to carry patients by hand, as critical care units teeter on collapse.

Water purification plants and sewage systems are shutting down without generator support, raising alarms over disease risks. UN officials have witnessed a sharp rise in meningitis and diarrhoeal illnesses among children. Bakeries and community kitchens have stopped, reducing the availability of fresh bread—a major food source for the displaced.

Although a one‑time delivery of some 75,000 litres reached Gaza—marking the first fuel entry in roughly four months—UN agencies caution this is but a drop in a deepening crisis. The quantity represents only a small fraction of the daily requirement to sustain relief operations. Officials emphasise that without regular, scaled deliveries, essential services face imminent blanket failure.

Israeli authorities have maintained that fuel shipments may be misused by militant groups, a claim that relief agencies strongly dispute. UN humanitarian representatives assert that fuel restrictions effectively constitute a form of collective punishment, with civilians bearing the brunt.

The blockade has persisted alongside ongoing military operations since March, despite intermittent commitments to allow aid in. The latest minimal fuel delivery was reportedly the first in 130 days. UN Secretary‑General António Guterres warned that without fuel to power ambulances, incubators and water networks, the fabric of civilian life is unraveling.

Aid workers are racing to implement rationing measures, diverting remaining stocks toward the most critical services—hospitals, maternity wards, water treatment facilities and mobile communications. But this partial reprieve is insufficient to meet surging demand.

In Gaza and beyond, humanitarian experts are urging urgent diplomatic engagement. Negotiations for new fuel corridors and scaled deliveries via Egypt and other Gaza crossings are underway, though the process remains slow and subject to volatile approval protocols. Some international mediators argue that allowing fuel in is as vital as increasing food aid, citing the interdependency of humanitarian systems.

The crisis has sparked global concern. UN agencies emphasise that fuel is the “backbone of survival”—not just for hospitals but for sanitation, communications, bakeries and logistics networks that sustain entire communities.

As operations continue under strain, the spotlight falls on the window of opportunity for diplomatic resolution. Pressure is mounting on all parties involved to remove barriers inhibiting consistent fuel access, which UN officials say is non‑negotiable to prevent the collapse of civilian life in Gaza.