News related to
Security

Prime Minister Narendra Modi began a three-nation diplomatic tour covering Jordan, Ethiopia and Oman, signalling a calibrated push to deepen political engagement, economic cooperation and people-to-people ties across West Asia and Africa. The visit places emphasis on long-standing partnerships while marking diplomatic milestones that officials describe as pivotal to a wider strategy linking the Gulf, the Horn of Africa and South Asia.

The tour opened in Jordan, where Modi held talks with King Abdullah II in Amman. Discussions focused on regional stability, counter-terror cooperation and expanding trade and investment links. Jordan occupies a strategic position in West Asia diplomacy, and both sides underlined shared concerns over conflicts affecting the region and their spillover effects. Bilateral exchanges also addressed cooperation in health care, education and technology, areas where existing agreements are being reviewed for expansion.

Jordan has emerged as a steady political partner, and the visit underscored efforts to elevate ties beyond symbolism. Officials highlighted collaboration in renewable energy and pharmaceuticals, alongside labour and skills partnerships that reflect Jordan’s role as a hub for regional services. Cultural engagement featured prominently, with references to the shared heritage reflected in academic exchanges and archaeological cooperation.

From Amman, Modi travelled to Addis Ababa, marking a significant diplomatic moment with Ethiopia. The visit coincides with the strengthening of relations with the African Union, headquartered in the Ethiopian capital, and signals intent to broaden engagement with Africa’s multilateral institutions. Talks with Prime Minister Abiy Ahmed centred on development cooperation, infrastructure financing and capacity building, as well as coordination in international forums.

Ethiopia’s role as a gateway to the Horn of Africa places it at the centre of regional connectivity and security discussions. The leaders examined cooperation in agriculture, manufacturing and digital public infrastructure, with attention to skills development and technology transfer. Ethiopia has been seeking diversified investment partnerships to support industrial parks and export-oriented growth, and the talks reflected interest in long-term collaboration rather than project-based engagement.

Diplomatic officials also pointed to cooperation in peacekeeping and humanitarian assistance, noting Ethiopia’s contribution to regional stability and its engagement with multilateral peace processes. The visit reinforced engagement with Africa at a time when competition for influence and investment has intensified, and when African economies are prioritising infrastructure and human capital development.

The final leg of the tour takes Modi to Oman, a country with deep historical and economic links, particularly in trade, energy and maritime cooperation. Meetings in Muscat are expected to focus on energy security, logistics and defence ties, building on agreements covering strategic petroleum reserves, port development and naval collaboration. Oman’s role as a stable interlocutor in the Gulf has given it a distinctive place in regional diplomacy.

Economic cooperation remains central to the Oman visit, with attention on bilateral trade, investment flows and collaboration in downstream energy projects. The presence of a large expatriate community has added a people-centric dimension to relations, shaping discussions on labour welfare, skills recognition and mobility. Financial services, tourism and green energy have emerged as additional areas of interest as both sides seek to diversify economic engagement.

Across the three stops, the tour reflects a broader pattern of outreach that links West Asia and Africa through trade corridors, energy routes and strategic partnerships. Officials involved in the preparations described the itinerary as a deliberate effort to balance political dialogue with economic substance, moving beyond ceremonial diplomacy. The focus on infrastructure, digital governance and energy transition aligns with priorities shared by many emerging economies.

Quality of life has emerged as the defining differentiator in Dubai’s luxury real estate market, overtaking the earlier emphasis on global brand names as affluent buyers continue to flow into the emirate, according to senior industry voices tracking buying behaviour at the top end of the sector.

Developers and brokers say high-net-worth individuals are no longer drawn solely by branded residences, waterfront addresses or headline prices. Instead, purchasing decisions are increasingly shaped by liveability factors such as community design, access to green space, wellness infrastructure, privacy, security, and the integration of daily services within residential districts. This shift reflects the changing profile of buyers, many of whom are relocating families or establishing long-term bases rather than acquiring purely investment assets.

Dubai’s luxury segment has expanded sharply over the past few years, with prime residential areas such as Palm Jumeirah, Emirates Hills, Jumeirah Bay Island and Dubai Hills Estate recording strong demand across villas and high-end apartments. Transaction values at the upper end of the market have risen, supported by sustained interest from buyers based in Europe, the Middle East, East Asia and parts of Africa. Market participants note that this demand has remained resilient despite global economic uncertainty, underpinned by Dubai’s status as a low-tax jurisdiction, political stability and international connectivity.

Industry executives argue that the maturation of buyer expectations is a sign of a more sophisticated market. Luxury purchasers are placing greater weight on neighbourhood planning, walkability, schools, healthcare access and leisure amenities, alongside the quality of construction and long-term maintenance standards. Smart home technology, energy efficiency, noise management and private outdoor space have become standard expectations rather than premium add-ons.

Wellness has become a particularly influential theme. Developers are incorporating features such as landscaped parks, jogging tracks, cycling paths, spa facilities and air-quality controls into master-planned communities. Water access, whether through beachfront living, marinas or canal-side developments, remains a powerful draw, but buyers are increasingly scrutinising how these elements support daily living rather than visual appeal alone.

The rise of liveability as a core selling point has altered developer strategies. Several major players are prioritising mixed-use developments that blend residential, retail, hospitality and office components into self-contained ecosystems. This approach is designed to reduce commuting times and create neighbourhoods where residents can live, work and socialise within a short radius, aligning with broader urban planning goals set out by Dubai authorities.

Pricing dynamics also reflect the shift. Properties that combine prime locations with strong community features have outperformed standalone luxury units that rely mainly on branding or architectural statement. Analysts observe that buyers are willing to pay premiums for homes that offer privacy, low density and access to well-managed communal spaces, while overly dense developments face greater scrutiny.

Rental demand in the luxury segment has mirrored these trends. Executive tenants and relocating families are seeking properties that provide stability and lifestyle benefits, driving demand for villas and larger apartments in established communities. This has supported yields in select areas, reinforcing the appeal of liveability-focused developments to both end users and long-term investors.

Dubai’s regulatory environment has also played a role in shaping buyer confidence. Clear property ownership rules, long-term residency options linked to investment, and transparent transaction processes have helped position the city as a secure destination for capital. Market participants say this framework encourages buyers to consider lifestyle factors, confident that their legal and financial interests are protected.

Competition among developers has intensified as a result. Rather than competing solely on scale or brand partnerships, firms are differentiating through design quality, community management and post-handover services. Some developers have expanded in-house property management and concierge offerings to ensure consistent standards after completion, addressing a long-standing concern among luxury buyers.

Cognizant has opened a new AI Lab and a Moment Studio in Bengaluru, signalling a deeper push into enterprise-focused artificial intelligence, multi-agent systems and immersive digital experiences as global clients accelerate adoption of advanced automation and data-driven platforms.

The facilities, located in the city’s technology corridor, are designed to function as integrated hubs where research, product engineering and client co-creation converge. Cognizant said the AI Lab will concentrate on applied research across generative AI, multi-agent architectures, responsible AI frameworks and industry-specific models, while the Moment Studio will focus on experience-led design, blending AI with data, cloud and interactive technologies to help enterprises modernise customer and employee journeys.

Bengaluru’s selection reflects its role as Cognizant’s largest delivery base worldwide and a centre for digital engineering talent. The company employs tens of thousands of professionals across the city, spanning cloud, analytics, cybersecurity and software engineering. Senior executives have described the new facilities as a strategic investment aimed at shortening the distance between innovation and deployment at a time when clients are moving from pilots to scaled AI implementation.

The AI Lab is expected to work on multi-agent systems that allow autonomous software agents to collaborate, negotiate tasks and adapt to changing business conditions. Such systems are increasingly viewed as a step beyond single-model generative AI, particularly for complex enterprise workflows such as supply chain optimisation, financial operations, software testing and IT service management. Cognizant engineers will also focus on building governance layers to address transparency, bias mitigation, data lineage and regulatory compliance, areas that have become central to enterprise adoption.

Alongside this, the Moment Studio will act as a client-facing environment where design teams, data scientists and engineers jointly prototype digital products. The studio model, which Cognizant has rolled out in several global locations, emphasises rapid experimentation, user-centric design and measurable business outcomes. In Bengaluru, the studio will place particular emphasis on AI-driven personalisation, intelligent interfaces, extended reality and data visualisation for sectors such as banking, healthcare, manufacturing and retail.

Company leadership has framed the expansion as part of a broader shift in client demand. Enterprises are no longer seeking isolated AI tools but integrated platforms that can be embedded into core operations with clear accountability. That shift has placed pressure on technology services firms to combine research capability with delivery scale and domain knowledge, areas where Bengaluru’s ecosystem offers advantages.

The move also aligns with Cognizant’s wider strategy to reposition itself as an AI-first services company. Over the past two years, the firm has increased investment in generative AI platforms, partnered with major cloud providers and integrated AI capabilities into its consulting and engineering offerings. The Bengaluru AI Lab is expected to collaborate closely with Cognizant’s global research teams and with academic institutions and startups in the region, although the company has not disclosed specific partnerships tied to the launch.

Industry analysts note that the emphasis on responsible AI is particularly significant. As enterprises deploy AI across regulated environments, scrutiny from boards, regulators and customers has intensified. Embedding governance, auditability and ethical safeguards at the design stage is increasingly seen as a differentiator rather than an optional feature. Cognizant’s decision to anchor this work in a dedicated lab suggests an attempt to institutionalise these practices across its delivery network.

The expansion also underscores the competitive dynamics among global technology services firms operating in Bengaluru. Peers have been scaling AI centres of excellence, experience studios and innovation labs in the city, seeking proximity to talent and clients while managing costs. For Cognizant, the dual-facility model aims to bridge the gap between conceptual innovation and real-world deployment, a gap that has slowed returns on AI investment for many organisations.

By Nitya Chakraborty The announcement by the Bangladesh Election Commission on the holding of general elections in Bangladesh on February 12 next year is a major development in the evolving politics of South Asia, especially with respect to India. The EC statement was welcomed by all the contesting political parties. The nomination process will be […]

The article Bangladesh Elections On February 12, 2026 Matter A Lot To India appeared first on Latest India news, analysis and reports on Newspack by India Press Agency).

Abu Dhabi has hosted the CGIAR System Council meeting for the first time in the Arabian Gulf region, marking a significant moment for global agricultural governance and underscoring the UAE’s ambition to position itself as a convening hub for food systems innovation, climate resilience and sustainable development.

The gathering brought together representatives of governments, multilateral organisations, donors and research leaders who collectively oversee CGIAR, the world’s largest public agricultural research partnership. The System Council sets strategic direction, approves funding allocations and assesses the impact of research programmes that influence food security for hundreds of millions of people, particularly in climate-vulnerable regions.

Hosting the council in the UAE reflects a broader shift in global agricultural research towards regions facing acute water stress, rising temperatures and land degradation. Officials involved in the meeting emphasised that solutions for future food systems must be designed and tested in environments that mirror the challenges many countries already face, including arid climates and fragile ecosystems. The Gulf, long associated with food import dependence, is increasingly presented as a laboratory for innovation in desert agriculture, controlled-environment farming and climate-smart technologies.

CGIAR’s research portfolio spans crop improvement, climate adaptation, nutrition, water management and biodiversity conservation. Its network includes 15 research centres operating across Africa, Asia, Latin America and parts of the Middle East. Discussions in Abu Dhabi focused on aligning research priorities with accelerating climate risks, tightening development budgets and the need to demonstrate measurable outcomes for smallholder farmers and vulnerable communities.

Senior figures attending the meeting highlighted the urgency of scaling innovations that improve productivity while reducing environmental footprints. Heat-tolerant crop varieties, drought-resilient seeds, precision irrigation systems and data-driven advisory services were cited as areas where scientific advances are already delivering tangible benefits. Council members also reviewed progress on integrating gender equity and nutrition outcomes into agricultural research, recognising that yield gains alone do not guarantee food security.

The UAE’s role as host was framed around its investments in agri-tech, food security strategies and international development partnerships. Over the past decade, the country has expanded funding for agricultural research, supported pilot projects in arid farming and strengthened ties with international institutions working on climate adaptation. Officials involved in organising the meeting said the decision to host the council aligned with national priorities on sustainable food production and knowledge-based economic diversification.

Beyond symbolism, the location influenced the agenda. Sessions examined how lessons from desert agriculture can be adapted for other water-scarce regions, including parts of Africa and Central Asia. Controlled-environment agriculture, including greenhouse and vertical farming, featured prominently as participants assessed their potential to complement open-field farming rather than replace it. Energy use, affordability and scalability in lower-income settings were central to these debates.

Financing emerged as a critical issue. CGIAR operates in an environment of competing global crises, where humanitarian needs, climate finance and development assistance all draw from limited public funds. Council members discussed strategies to broaden the donor base, attract blended finance and strengthen partnerships with the private sector without compromising CGIAR’s public-good mandate. Transparency, accountability and rigorous impact evaluation were repeatedly emphasised as essential to maintaining donor confidence.

The meeting also addressed governance reforms within CGIAR, which has undergone structural changes aimed at improving coordination across its research centres. Council members reviewed progress on streamlining programmes, reducing duplication and enhancing collaboration with national research systems. Strengthening ties with regional institutions in the Middle East and North Africa was identified as an opportunity to expand the reach of research outputs while respecting local contexts.

A wave of ambition is reshaping the technology landscape as leading entrepreneurs turn their attention to building artificial intelligence data centres in space. What began as scattered experiments in off-planet computing has matured into a competition among industry powerhouses seeking an edge in processing capacity, energy efficiency, and control over the infrastructure that will anchor next-generation AI systems. The pursuit is driven by the belief that Earth-based facilities are reaching fundamental limits, from land availability to cooling constraints, and that low-Earth orbit may provide the only environment capable of sustaining the exponential escalation in computational demand. Advocates frame this as an extension of a long-standing principle in engineering and exploration: to put human ingenuity to its fullest possible use, wherever the boundaries of science allow.

Several major technology leaders have stepped into this arena over the past two years. Their investments reflect a profound shift in strategy as companies realise that AI models cannot continue to scale using terrestrial infrastructure alone. The voracious energy requirements of large-scale training workloads challenge even the most advanced data-centre designs, pushing firms to explore solutions that draw on off-planet solar power and exploit the vacuum of space for passive cooling. Executives argue that orbiting facilities promise a cleaner energy profile, reduced environmental impact, and unprecedented independence from Earth’s physical constraints. As one aerospace investor remarked during a private industry event, the next digital revolution may be fuelled not by new algorithms but by new geography.

Engineering teams working on these orbital concepts often describe them as a convergence of satellite technology, chip innovation, and AI architecture. The logic is straightforward: satellites already operate reliably in extreme conditions with limited maintenance; AI systems increasingly require specialised compute hardware that benefits from consistent temperature conditions; and the economics of launch have changed dramatically due to reusable rockets. Once the cost of placing hardware into orbit falls to thresholds comparable to building premium facilities on Earth, the case for space-based computing strengthens considerably. What was once a speculative thought experiment has become a viable commercial target because access to space is no longer a privilege of governments alone.

However, the motivations driving this race are not solely technical. Strategic considerations weigh heavily. Ownership of orbital AI capacity promises unparalleled control over data sovereignty and computational independence. For executives wary of regulatory intervention or geopolitical risk, space offers a jurisdictional buffer that has become increasingly attractive. The ability to operate hardware outside traditional national borders gives corporations leverage at a moment when governments are tightening rules on data transfer, algorithmic transparency, and cloud-computing dependencies. Critics warn that this dynamic could set the stage for tension between public oversight and private ambition, particularly as orbital networks start to support commercial, defence, and financial applications simultaneously.

Security analysts have begun to examine the implications of off-planet AI infrastructure for global stability. On one hand, distributing critical systems across multiple orbital layers may reduce the vulnerability of communication and computing networks to terrestrial attacks or natural disasters. On the other, it introduces fresh risks, as high-value satellites could become targets in future disputes. Industry leaders tend to emphasise resilience and cooperation, arguing that shared standards and open coordination mechanisms can prevent escalation. Yet even in the early stages of development, commercial confidentiality and competitive pressure limit transparency, raising questions about how cooperative such a system can truly be.

Environmental considerations further complicate the picture. Proponents argue that orbital facilities will dramatically reduce the carbon footprint of data centres by tapping continuous solar energy and eliminating the need for extensive water-based cooling. They claim that redirecting computation to space will relieve pressure on overloaded terrestrial grids and free up land used for sprawling data-centre campuses. Environmental organisations counter that launching hundreds of tonnes of hardware into orbit will generate emissions during the construction phase and intensify concerns about space debris. Engineers involved in the projects acknowledge these issues but maintain that the long-term carbon savings outweigh the initial costs. Some firms have begun exploring closed-loop manufacturing cycles using recycled orbital material, a concept still in its infancy but increasingly part of corporate presentations.

The economic dimension of the space computing race has also attracted significant attention. Venture capital firms see orbital AI networks as a foundational platform similar in scale to the early internet, creating opportunities for startups focused on maintenance robotics, radiation-hardened chips, inter-satellite laser communication, and autonomous control systems. Government space agencies have shown interest too, recognising that private data-centre initiatives could stimulate broader commercial activity in orbit. Financial analysts caution that the capital intensity of these projects is immense and that many entrants may struggle to secure the funds required to move from prototype to full-scale deployment. But they also acknowledge that the firms leading the charge have histories of turning audacious concepts into viable industries.

One of the most compelling arguments for orbital AI centres revolves around scientific potential. Researchers emphasise that such facilities could support breakthroughs in materials engineering, climate modelling, pharmaceutical development, and astrophysics. Training models in microgravity environments may enable experiments that are impractical on Earth, and the isolation of orbital systems creates opportunities for secure high-performance computing dedicated to sensitive research. A prominent AI scientist recently noted at a conference that new frontiers in intelligence will be unlocked only when researchers have access to computational substrates as novel as the algorithms themselves, and that space may provide exactly that.

Despite enthusiasm, several fundamental questions remain unresolved. Energy transmission is one of them. While orbiting platforms can harness abundant solar power, efficiently transferring that energy to onboard compute clusters and ensuring stable operation during orbital night remains a challenge. Another issue concerns maintenance. Although robotic servicing is improving, most concepts still require periodic human intervention, raising questions about safety, reliability, and cost. Legal scholars are also wrestling with the future regulatory landscape, debating whether orbital AI nodes should be governed by space law, telecommunications frameworks, or entirely new agreements. These uncertainties highlight the complexity of forging infrastructure that defies conventional definitions.

Public perception is another area shaping the debate. The idea of billionaire-led initiatives expanding beyond Earth has drawn criticism from those who view it as a diversion of resources from urgent terrestrial needs. Advocates counter that technology has always advanced through bold exploration and that the benefits of space-based AI will eventually extend across society, from medical research to disaster forecasting. Several industry leaders have used narratives emphasising human progress and responsibility, suggesting that building orbital computing platforms represents a contribution to global knowledge rather than a retreat from Earth’s challenges.

By Nitya Chakraborty For rich European nations, especially the troika Germany, France and Britain, the geopolitical situation that is unfolding in the year 2026 has enough elements of an existential crisis as a result of the announcement of the US policy on global security which marginalizes the role of European nations and NATO in the […]

The article Where Is Europe Placed In The Emerging Global Geopolitics? appeared first on Latest India news, analysis and reports on Newspack by India Press Agency).