News related to
Part

India has overtaken most markets to become the world’s second-largest 5G network by user base, crossing an estimated 400 million subscribers as operators expand coverage and devices become more affordable. The scale of adoption places the country behind only China, underscoring the pace at which fifth-generation services have spread across cities, towns and large rural corridors.

Official tallies compiled from industry disclosures and regulatory filings show nationwide 5G availability across all states and union territories, with more than 450,000 base stations activated since commercial launch in October 2022. Data from the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India indicates that fifth-generation users now account for a substantial share of total mobile broadband connections, a shift that has occurred faster than earlier transitions from 2G to 3G and 4G.

India’s 5G surge reshapes global rankings as operators leveraged aggressive rollouts and introductory pricing to seed usage. The government’s early spectrum auctions, coupled with simplified right-of-way rules for fibre and towers, reduced deployment friction. Policymakers also pushed indigenous manufacturing through production-linked incentives, lowering equipment costs and shortening supply chains.

Market leaders have driven much of the momentum. Reliance Jio built a standalone 5G network using mid-band spectrum and dense fibre backhaul, prioritising urban clusters and industrial zones before pushing into smaller towns. Bharti Airtel opted for a non-standalone architecture initially, upgrading existing 4G sites to accelerate time-to-market while expanding capacity. Vodafone Idea has begun selective launches following capital infusions, focusing on circles with higher data demand.

Subscriber growth has been supported by falling handset prices and a rapid refresh cycle. Entry-level 5G smartphones from domestic and global brands now sit near mass-market price points, while older devices have been phased out as networks refarm spectrum. Analysts note that average data consumption per user has climbed as video streaming, cloud gaming and real-time navigation benefit from lower latency and higher throughput.

Enterprise use cases are also gaining ground. Private 5G deployments are being tested in ports, manufacturing plants and campuses to support automation, predictive maintenance and machine vision. The Department of Telecommunications has approved pilot licences for captive networks, enabling firms to experiment without relying solely on public networks. Healthcare applications such as remote diagnostics and education tools like immersive classrooms are being trialled in partnership with state governments.

The speed of expansion reflects a competitive pricing environment. Unlimited 5G plans bundled with 4G subscriptions reduced barriers to trial, while promotional offers encouraged device upgrades. Industry executives argue that scale efficiencies and declining network costs will support sustainable pricing even as data traffic rises.

Challenges persist. Monetisation remains uneven as consumers expect higher speeds at similar prices, pressuring average revenue per user. Network densification in dense urban areas requires continued capital expenditure, and power availability in remote regions complicates operations. Cybersecurity and data privacy frameworks must keep pace with new applications that rely on ultra-reliable connectivity.

Spectrum policy will shape the next phase. Operators are seeking clarity on millimetre-wave allocations to unlock ultra-high-capacity hotspots for campuses and stadiums. Backhaul capacity, particularly fibreisation of towers, is another bottleneck that policymakers are addressing through coordinated infrastructure planning.

Globally, India’s ascent alters competitive dynamics. Vendors see the market as a proving ground for large-scale deployments, while application developers view it as a launchpad for services that require millions of concurrent users. The country’s experience is being studied by emerging economies looking to leapfrog directly to advanced mobile broadband.

By Dr. Gyan Pathak December 2025 registered a rise in unemployment rate in India to 4.8 per cent from 4.7 per cent in November despite the seasonal increase in agricultural and allied activity in rural India. Additionally, it should be a matter of concern that unemployment rate in rural India failed to improve in November […]

The article Rise In Unemployment Rate In December Is Warning Signal For India appeared first on Latest India news, analysis and reports on Newspack by India Press Agency).

China’s market watchdog has ordered the removal of co-located trading servers from exchange data centres, a step that strikes at the core of high-frequency trading strategies by stripping away microsecond advantages and reshaping how orders reach the market.

The directive, conveyed to brokerages and proprietary trading firms over the past week, requires firms to relocate servers that sit inside or adjacent to exchange facilities, a practice that has allowed algorithmic traders to exploit ultra-low latency connections. By mandating physical separation, regulators aim to level access speeds across participants and curb behaviour blamed for sharp intraday swings.

Officials at the China Securities Regulatory Commission have framed the move as part of a broader effort to restore fairness and stability at a time when volatility has tested investor confidence. Exchanges have begun coordinating timelines with members, while technology vendors assess the operational impact of migrating equipment and reconfiguring networks.

At the heart of the change is co-location, a service long offered by major venues such as the Shanghai Stock Exchange and the Shenzhen Stock Exchange. By placing servers in the same buildings as matching engines, firms could shave milliseconds off order transmission, a decisive edge for strategies that depend on speed. The new rule eliminates that edge by forcing all traders to connect from outside facilities, effectively compressing the speed differential.

Market participants say the immediate effect will be uneven. Firms that rely heavily on latency-sensitive strategies face higher costs and potential revenue declines, while asset managers and retail-focused brokers expect fewer instances of sudden price dislocations triggered by rapid-fire trades. Some proprietary desks have already paused certain algorithms as engineers test alternative connectivity routes.

Regulators’ concerns extend beyond fairness. Officials have grown wary of feedback loops in which automated strategies amplify short-term moves, especially during thin liquidity. Episodes of abrupt swings in small- and mid-cap shares have sharpened scrutiny of trading practices that can overwhelm order books in fractions of a second. By slowing the fastest participants, authorities believe markets will better reflect underlying supply and demand.

The measure also aligns with a wider tightening of oversight on quantitative trading. Over the past year, exchanges have refined monitoring of order-to-trade ratios, imposed stricter reporting on algorithmic strategies, and increased penalties for disruptive behaviour. Server removal adds a structural constraint that complements those rules, shifting the emphasis from after-the-fact enforcement to preventative design.

Technology providers are bracing for a wave of changes. Data centre operators linked to exchanges will see reduced demand for premium co-location services, while telecom firms may benefit as traders invest in faster external links to mitigate latency losses. Network optimisation, time-synchronisation tools and smarter order-routing software are expected to attract investment as firms adapt.

There are risks of short-term disruption. Moving servers involves downtime, testing and regulatory approvals, raising the possibility of temporary liquidity dips in certain instruments. Exchanges have signalled flexibility on implementation schedules to avoid disorderly conditions, though the direction of policy is clear. Compliance teams are urging firms to prioritise stability over speed during the transition.

Internationally, the decision is being watched closely. Other jurisdictions have grappled with the balance between innovation and fairness, with mixed approaches ranging from speed bumps to transaction taxes. China’s choice to remove co-location altogether is among the most decisive interventions to date and could influence debates elsewhere, particularly in markets where retail participation is high.

A landmark judicial ruling on the taxation of foreign investments routed through Mauritius has sent ripples across global financial markets, unsettling investors who have long relied on the island nation as a preferred gateway into India. The decision, delivered by the Supreme Court of India, upholds the government’s right to tax certain capital gains arising from indirect transfers and treaty-based structures, reinforcing a tougher stance on what authorities describe as aggressive tax planning.

India’s decisive stand on Mauritius-linked investments has revived debate over the balance between sovereign tax powers and investor certainty. Government data underline the scale of what is at stake. Over the 23 years leading up to 2023, cumulative foreign direct investment routed from Mauritius amounted to about $171 billion, making it the single largest source of inflows. For decades, the India–Mauritius Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement enabled investors to claim capital gains tax exemptions, helping fuel equity investment, private equity deals and strategic acquisitions.

The court’s ruling addresses disputes that intensified after New Delhi amended tax laws and renegotiated treaties to curb what it saw as treaty abuse. While the revised tax treaty signed in 2016 had already limited exemptions for new investments, the judgment clarifies that authorities may scrutinise older structures if they lack commercial substance. Tax officials argue the decision closes loopholes without violating treaty commitments, while investors warn it introduces uncertainty for legacy holdings.

Officials from the finance ministry maintain that the ruling aligns with international norms promoted by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, particularly the Base Erosion and Profit Shifting framework. They stress that genuine investors with demonstrable economic substance in Mauritius have little to fear. However, fund managers say the practical test will lie in how tax authorities interpret “substance” and whether retrospective demands emerge through reassessments.

Market reaction has been cautious. Legal advisers report a spike in queries from foreign portfolio investors and multinational corporations reassessing exposure to India-linked assets held through Mauritius vehicles. Some funds have begun exploring alternative jurisdictions such as Singapore or the Netherlands, though treaty benefits in those routes have also narrowed over time. The broader concern is not a single treaty, but a pattern of assertive tax enforcement that could complicate exit planning.

Mauritius itself faces strategic implications. The island has worked to reposition its financial sector beyond treaty advantages, emphasising regulatory credibility, compliance standards and links to African markets. Authorities in Port Louis have reiterated that the country remains committed to transparency and cooperation, noting that the revised treaty framework already reflects shared objectives with New Delhi.

Economists note that India’s investment landscape has changed markedly since the era when Mauritius structures dominated. Domestic capital markets are deeper, startup funding has diversified, and manufacturing-linked incentives are attracting strategic investors less dependent on tax arbitrage. Even so, foreign capital remains critical for sectors such as infrastructure, renewable energy and technology, making predictability in tax policy a sensitive issue.

Corporate leaders caution that while sovereign governments have the right to protect revenues, abrupt shifts can affect perceptions of stability. Several high-profile disputes in the past decade, including cases involving telecom and energy companies, continue to shape investor memory. The latest ruling, they say, reinforces the need for clear administrative guidance to avoid prolonged litigation.

From the government’s perspective, the judgment strengthens its hand in ongoing tax assessments and signals continuity in policy direction. Officials argue that aligning domestic law with treaty intent ultimately supports fair competition and long-term growth. They also point to dispute resolution mechanisms and advance rulings as safeguards for investors seeking clarity.