News related to
chip

Kraken has launched xStocks, a platform enabling users outside the United States to trade 60 tokenised U.S. stocks and ETFs around the clock, five days a week. Accessible through the Kraken app, these equities are issued on the Solana blockchain and are fully backed one‑for‑one by genuine shares held via Backed and Dinari, offering both price parity and economic rights.

The new service opens over 60 blue‑chip names—including Apple, Tesla, Nvidia and Amazon—to non‑U.S. investors, granting fractional ownership starting at just US$1, with no purchase fee in USD or Kraken’s native USDG. Trading is available 24/5 via the exchange, while withdrawal to self‑custodial wallets allows for 24/7 on‑chain usage, such as collateral in DeFi.

Kraken’s co‑chief executive Arjun Sethi described xStocks as a “foundational” shift in investment accessibility, emphasising seamless, permissionless ownership without intermediaries or geo‑barriers. The tokens are structured as SPL assets on Solana, chosen for its speed and efficiency, and dividends are auto‑reinvested into additional tokens, though users forfeit direct voting rights.

Kraken has imposed geo‑restrictions, excluding U.S. persons as well as residents in Canada, EU, UK and Australia during the initial rollout—but plans to expand to more than 185 countries in the coming weeks and eventually extend to multiple blockchains. The exchange emphasizes adherence to regulatory frameworks, supported by its partnerships with Swiss issuer Backed and U.S. SEC‑registered transfer agent Dinari.

The advent of tokenised stocks follows earlier, less‑successful attempts by Binance in 2021, which encountered regulatory pushback in multiple jurisdictions. Coincidentally, Bybit unveiled access to the same xStocks pool two hours after Kraken, signalling an intensifying push within the crypto sector. Bybit’s version supports both Solana and Ethereum versions, aimed at users seeking a bridge between traditional finance and crypto.

The global tokenisation of equities is attracting attention across the industry. Robinhood has launched tokenised stock trading in the EU in partnership with Arbitrum, enabling EU residents to trade over 200 U.S. equities 24/5. Coinbase is also pursuing approval from the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission to offer tokenised equities domestically, pending regulatory clearance. Several firms recognise tokenisation’s potential to reduce costs, improve settlement times, and introduce continuous trading, though they acknowledge challenges surrounding liquidity and regulatory harmonisation.

Market watchers suggest tokenised equities could reshape global finance. The linkage to blockchain allows cross‑border access, seamless custody and composability in DeFi ecosystems. Critics note limitations, such as absence of voting rights and uncertain secondary‑market liquidity. The World Economic Forum and legal analysts have underlined the need for clearer disclosure standards and global regulatory coordination.

Kraken’s move appears calibrated to capitalise on a regulatory shift favouring tokenisation. It actively engages with international regulators, avoiding pitfalls that stymied predecessors. Its strategy builds on existing infrastructure—such as its listing of more than 11,000 traditional U.S. securities to U.S. clients—melding established market access with on‑chain innovation.

The launch of xStocks marks a pivotal moment in mainstreaming tokenised finance. By undercutting geographical limitations, slashing fees and uniting traditional equities with crypto rails, Kraken and peers are edging global capital markets closer to seamless, inclusive accessibility. As the ecosystem evolves, attention will turn to how regulatory authorities respond and whether liquidity deepens to support this new asset class.

A Singapore court has postponed the trial of three men accused of illegally redirecting Nvidia AI chips to China until 22 August, after prosecutors stressed the need for additional time to analyse fresh documents and obtain international cooperation. The adjournment allows police to deepen their review of evidence and reach out to overseas authorities for responses.

Charged with fraud, the defendants—Singaporeans Aaron Woon Guo Jie, 41, and Alan Wei Zhaolun, 49, along with Chinese national Li Ming, 51—stand accused of falsifying end‑user information to secure servers during purchases in 2023 and 2024. Those servers, allegedly equipped with high-end Nvidia chips, were then shipped via Singapore to Malaysia before possibly continuing to China. Political pressure surrounds the case, as the United States banned exports of leading-edge chips to China in 2022 over military and intelligence concerns. A senior U.S. official has asserted that DeepSeek, the Chinese AI firm implicated, supports military and intelligence operations.

Home Affairs Minister K. Shanmugam confirmed that Singapore authorities pursued the investigation independently after an anonymous tip-off, and preliminary findings indicate the servers may indeed contain Nvidia’s chips. The equipment, originally sourced from Dell Technologies and Super Micro Computer via Singapore‑based firms, was rerouted to Malaysia, though the final destination remains uncertain.

This case forms part of a broader probe involving 22 individuals and companies alleged to have falsified end‑user data in order to bypass export restrictions. Singapore’s position as a regional invoicing hub—recording 18% of Nvidia’s fiscal year revenues despite accounting for less than 2% of physical shipments—underscores its vulnerability as a transit point in such schemes.

Observers note that policing such complex supply chains is increasingly difficult, especially when high‑performance AI hardware carries dual-use potential with applications in advanced military or surveillance systems. Singapore’s legal actions and multilateral engagements will be closely watched as the court reconvenes late in August.

Cloud computing giants AWS, Google, Microsoft, Meta and OpenAI are accelerating in-house development of custom application‑specific integrated circuits, aiming to erode NVIDIA’s dominance in high‑performance AI datacentres. Industry reports highlight a projected annual growth rate of around 50% for ASIC purchases by hyperscalers, marking a strategic pivot in the AI hardware landscape.

NVIDIA’s premium-priced solutions—including Blackwell GPUs—have placed pressure on hyperscalers to secure more cost‑efficient, scalable systems. With single GPUs ranging from $70,000 to $80,000 and fully configured servers tallying up to $3 million, these companies are betting on internal design to manage costs and supply risks.

Amazon Web Services has notably moved ahead with its in‑house chips—Trainium for training and Inferentia for inference—reporting 30 – 40% greater cost efficiency compared with NVIDIA hardware. AWS is also collaborating with Marvell and Taiwan’s Alchip on next‑generation Trainium versions. Internal indications suggest AWS may deploy as many as half‑a‑million ASIC units in its data centres, an expansive scale‑up that could rival NVIDIA’s installed base.

Google, meanwhile, has scaled its TPU v6 Trillium chips, transitioning from single‑supplier to dual‑supplier design by partnering with MediaTek. With deployments reportedly hitting 100,000‑unit clusters to support Gemini 2.0 workloads, Google claims competitive cost-performance metrics relative to NVIDIA GPUs. Microsoft’s forthcoming Maia 200 chip, co‑designed with GUC using TSMC’s 3 nm process, is scheduled for commercial release in 2026.

Meta’s Meta Training and Inference Accelerator, developed alongside Broadcom, Socionext and GUC, is expected in early 2026 on TSMC’s 3 nm node, featuring HBM3e memory—another step towards self‑sufficiency in AI compute. OpenAI has also announced a proprietary training processor, with mass production anticipated at TSMC by 2026.

Market projections reflect this tectonic shift. ASICs are poised to claim between $100 billion and $130 billion of custom AI accelerator spend by 2030, with Broadcom estimating a market of $60 billion to $90 billion by 2027. Traditional ASIC powerhouses—Broadcom, Marvell, MediaTek, Alchip and GUC—are experiencing surging demand as they support hyperscaler transitions.

Despite these developments, hyperscalers continue to reserve capacity for NVIDIA chips, recognising the GPU giant’s entrenched ecosystem—especially its CUDA software stack—and the steep technical barriers to immediate elimination of GPU dependencies.

The trend resembles historical transitions in specialised compute. Just as cryptocurrency mining moved from GPUs to ASICs for lower costs and greater efficiency, hyperscalers now aim to fragment the AI compute supply chain and diversify their hardware portfolios.

TSMC stands to benefit significantly, serving as the foundry for both NVIDIA’s mass‑market GPUs and hyperscaler ASICs. Its chairman emphasises that the competition between NVIDIA and cloud‑designed chips is ultimately beneficial to TSMC, ensuring a broad customer base.

Broadcom has emerged as a frontrunner, with its ASIC and networking chipset revenues soaring 220% to $12.2 billion in 2024. Hyperscalers are investing in clusters featuring up to one million custom XPUs over open‑Ethernet networks—an architecture that places Broadcom and Marvell in strategic positions. Networking ASICs are expected to account for 15–20% of AI data‑centre silicon budgets, rising from the 5–10% range.

Revenue trends reflect these structural shifts. Marvell has secured a multi‑year AI chip deal with AWS and anticipates its AI silicon revenue jumping from $550 million in 2024 to over $2.5 billion in 2026. Broadcom, similarly, is redirecting significant investment toward hyperscaler ASIC demand.

Nevertheless, NVIDIA retains a commanding lead in AI training and general‑purpose GPU compute. Its end‑to‑end platform—from hardware to software—remains deeply embedded in the AI ecosystem. Custom ASICs, by contrast, offer task‑specific gains but lack the breadth of software compatibility that NVIDIA enables.

Analysts caution that the AI compute landscape is evolving toward a more fragmented, mixed‑architecture model combining GPUs and ASICs. Hyperscalers’ shift signals strategic recognition of rising costs, supply constraints, and performance demands. Yet, they also underscore persistent obstacles: software ecosystem maturity, long development cycles, and the complexity of large‑scale deployment.

Questions remain regarding the timeframe in which hyperscalers can meaningfully shift workloads away from NVIDIA GPUs. Industry roadmaps project new ASIC deployments through 2026–27. Analysts expect GPU market share erosion may begin toward the end of the decade, provided in-house ASICs deliver consistent performance and efficiency.

The stage is set for a multi‑year contest in datacentre compute. NVIDIA faces increasing pressure from hyperscalers building bespoke chips to optimise workloads and control supply. The next evolution of AI infrastructure may look less like a GPU‑centric world and more like a diverse ecosystem of specialised, interlocking processors.

ImFact today unveiled its “Blockchain Anywhere” infrastructure, enabling 6.8 billion devices—from smartphones to IoT hardware—to operate individual blockchain instances. Dubbed Personal Blockchain and On‑Device Blockchain, the rollout promises cryptographic data verification embedded directly within devices, marking a pivotal shift in trust architecture for artificial intelligence applications. The launch was showcased through Korea’s DaeguChain deployment across Daegu city and supported by a global testnet.

Personal Blockchain runs as a standalone blockchain on smartphones via mobile apps such as MyChain and Fact Stamp, allowing users to verify image authenticity, certify legal documents and complete offline transactions. In parallel, On‑Device Blockchain embeds blockchain functionality into internet-connected hardware—security cameras, autonomous vehicles, industrial sensors—assuring tamper-evident data creation at the source. Together, they integrate with ImFact’s Layer‑1 mainnet through a proprietary Station protocol.

These innovations build on six years of development and have undergone trials within DaeguChain, the civic blockchain network of Daegu city—South Korea’s fourth largest—with a population of 2.5 million. ImFact confirmed the system has proven reliable at enterprise scale. A dual‑track Testnet 2.0 currently supports more than 50,000 users across 97 countries, with participants incentivised via device mining rewards and verification incentives. The team aims to launch the Layer‑1 mainnet in Q4 2025.

Driving ImFact’s initiative is a leadership team comprising Professor Minkyu Je from KAIST—previously with Samsung—as head of hardware blockchain integration; Professor Yasin Ceran of San Jose State University and Stanford Medical School, focusing on privacy-sensitive health data verification on-device; and David Woong Jin Yoon, ex‑CEO of Gravity, steering strategic market deployment. Senior Ecosystem Builder San Jun described the development as the group’s solution to embedding blockchain functionality wherever computing power exists.

The announcement arrives against a backdrop of broader technological investment in South Korea. The government has pledged 16.1 trillion KRW over five years to boost artificial intelligence infrastructure, including data centres and GPU capacity, as outlined in a policy paper presented to the Presidential Policy Planning Committee on 18 June 2025. Key objectives include constructing AI data centres and offering open‑model development to citizens.

Industry analysts suggest that while South Korea’s blockchain strategy originated in controlled, closed networks, the growth of AI demands public and verifiable data systems. Infrastructure such as ImFact’s aligns with this strategic shift, seamlessly enabling decentralised trust within traditionally siloed environments.

ImFact positions its infrastructure as DePIN, distinct from existing offerings that rely on external validation. Instead, their data integrity is assured at the point of generation—whether it be a camera capturing footage or a sensor logging readings—with cryptographic proof to prevent tampering. The embedded nature enhances security and auditability, crucial for sectors like healthcare, autonomous vehicles, legal systems, and industrial monitoring.

While ImFact’s public roadmap outlines the L1 mainnet launch in late 2025, it is already actively engaging early adopters through Testnet 2.0. Users are deploying personal blockchain nodes on smartphones and integrating on-device blockchain chips in IoT hardware, generating token rewards and engaging in verifiable proof tasks. These early-stage validators are cultivating a nascent ecosystem that could mature rapidly ahead of commercial stage.

South Korea’s public sector stance and investment in AI and related infrastructure create a favourable landscape for projects like ImFact. The 16.1 trillion KRW policy emphasises open‑source AI models and GPU availability—initiatives that align with ImFact’s objective to offload cryptographic verification tasks to the edge of the network. The convergence of national policy and device-level trust architecture underscores an ecosystem designed to support AI at scale.

ImFact’s strategy hinges on the deployment and interoperability of three layers: personal blockchains for users, on-device blockchains for hardware, and an L1 mainnet offering global anchoring. Success depends on adoption rates of its mobile apps and IoT kits, regulatory acceptance of on-device verification for legal and medical use cases, and demonstration of clear ROI for participants in device mining.

Malé’s foreign exchange reserves have surged by more than $400 million, marking a notable strengthening of the nation’s external liquidity following a currency swap arrangement with the Reserve Bank of India. The Maldives Monetary Authority drew down the entire $400 million facility in October 2024, with the impact reflecting sharply in the country’s gross reserves, which rose to approximately $856 million by April 2025 from a low of $371 million earlier in the year.

Fitch Ratings has affirmed the Maldives’ Long‑Term Foreign‑Currency Issuer Default Rating at ‘CC’, citing the infusion from the RBI swap as a key factor in easing the country’s liquidity pressures. The agency also credited sustained tourism receipts and the implementation of the Foreign Currency Act, which compels tourism‑related businesses to convert a mandated portion of their monthly foreign‑currency revenues, for boosting reserves.

Despite the uplift in reserves, Fitch emphasised that gross holdings now cover just 1.5 months of external payments—well below the three‑and‑a‑half‑month median for comparable peers. Net reserves, after subtracting short‑term liabilities, remain critically thin at around $28 million. In its rating statement dated 12 June 2025, Fitch maintained the view that a sovereign default “remains a likely scenario within the foreseeable future” absent significant further support or reform.

The agency highlighted looming debt repayments of $688 million in the second half of 2025, rising to $1.1 billion in 2026, including bonds and sukuk. Policymakers in Malé are negotiating with external partners—including India, China, multilateral lenders and possibly the IMF—to secure deferments, fresh currency‑swap lines, or restructuring deals. Notwithstanding the swap, Fitch reiterated its concerns over persistent fiscal imbalance: the fiscal deficit is projected to widen to 14.5 per cent of GDP in 2025, public debt is set to reach 125 per cent of GDP by 2026, and important reforms—particularly in subsidy and healthcare spending—have been delayed on political grounds.

India formally welcomed the strengthening of Maldivian reserves, with the Indian High Commission in Malé posting on X that it “noted with satisfaction” the impact of the $400 million swap in easing external liquidity pressures. The move is part of broader bilateral economic cooperation anchored within the SAARC framework, signalling a continued role for India in supporting economic stability in Maldives.

Tourism continues to underpin the archipelago’s economy, with record visitor numbers bolstering inflows. Policymakers hope that the expansion of resort capacity and full operation of the new terminal at Velana International Airport will sustain growth and further cushion foreign currency earnings. Fitch projects GDP growth of around 4.8 per cent in 2025, increasing to 6.0 per cent in 2026 as tourism infrastructure develops.

The Foreign Currency Act, introduced last year as a fiscal measure, requires tourism businesses to sell at least 20 per cent of their monthly foreign exchange earnings to licensed banks. Separately, the MMA raised mandatory bank conversion thresholds from 60 per cent to 90 per cent, measures aimed at shoring up foreign‑exchange liquidity.

While the currency swap has delivered a temporary liquidity bridge, analysts caution that it falls short of addressing structural weaknesses. The MMA and government officials have underscored intentions to pursue fiscal consolidation and attract medium‑term financing. But Fitch has warned that absent sustained reserve accumulation, clear evidence of reform, and stronger fiscal discipline, the Maldives remains vulnerable to credit deterioration or a potential sovereign default.

India’s willingness to extend financial assistance underscores geopolitical and strategic interests. The inclusion of swap facilities, alongside ongoing debt negotiations with China and potential IMF engagement, may provide short‑term relief, but Maldives must improve its debt servicing capacity and rebuild buffers to avert future policy shocks.

BlackRock’s iShares Bitcoin Trust surpassed $70 billion in assets under management on 6 June, achieving the fastest accumulation ever seen for a spot ETF—reaching the milestone in just 341 trading days. That pace outstrips the previous record held by SPDR Gold Shares, which took 1,691 days, marking a fivefold acceleration.

IBIT now holds approximately 662,707 BTC, nearly 20 per cent of the total 3.4 million bitcoins held by public and private entities, government bodies, exchanges, and decentralised finance protocols. Such concentration under BlackRock’s control is reshaping the distribution of Bitcoin supply across institutional players.

Secondary spot Bitcoin ETFs—led by Fidelity’s Wise Origin with roughly $21.3 billion AUM, and Grayscale’s GBTC at $19.3 billion—lag far behind IBIT in scale. Ark 21Shares and Bitwise report assets under $5 billion. Analysts note that IBIT’s dominance reflects not only investor appetite for regulated exposure to Bitcoin but also confidence in BlackRock’s operational strength and trust in its custody and compliance framework.

The ETF’s structural advantages lie in its cost-effective fee, integration with Coinbase Prime custody, and BlackRock’s institutional-grade infrastructure. It provides market participants with direct Bitcoin exposure without requiring them to navigate private key management or self-custody complexities.

Bitcoin’s value hierarchy has been boosted by IBIT’s growth. With total holdings just shy of 663,000 BTC, the trust exceeds erstwhile leader MicroStrategy, which held 582,000 BTC. A rising number of publicly traded companies are preparing to expand their Bitcoin treasuries. Corporate treasurers are watching IBIT’s capital inflows closely, signalling a shift in institutional allocation strategies from traditional assets into digital scarcity.

The influence of corporate buyers extends beyond small-scale investments. Michael Saylor’s MicroStrategy remains a strong presence, but other blue‑chip corporates are signalling potential acquisitions. Arkham Intelligence data indicates that incremental corporate accumulation may further redistribute Bitcoin supply, previously more diversified across governments, miners and individual holders.

IBIT’s momentum accelerated in May, posting its largest monthly inflow yet. Bloomberg reports this surge synchronised with Bitcoin trading above $108,000, hinting at institutional investors strategically buying ahead of broader market highs.

Secondary market activity reinforces the appetite for IBIT shares. In April, the ETF recorded a single‑day trading volume of $4.2 billion—with Bitcoin hovering around $91,000—underscoring its liquidity and the appetite among both retail and institutional investors.

Industry experts suggest this liquidity is a key attractor. IBIT’s trading activity consistently outpaces competitors, offering tighter spreads and reduced transaction costs, which in turn fuels further inflows.

Regulatory clarity remains pivotal. The official IBIT prospectus confirms the trust is governed by Delaware law, uses Coinbase as custodian and prime broker, and implements safeguards to align on‑chain Bitcoin with the ETF shares. This structure mitigates risks of mispricing or premium/discount discrepancies, giving institutional investors assurance. It also reveals that IBIT is not registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, though it complies with major U.S. securities and exchange rules.

Meanwhile, BlackRock hints at international ambitions. A European equivalent to IBIT is under regulatory consideration, targeting Swiss registration under evolving EU cryptocurrency taxonomy. The success of the U.S. product strengthens its case for cross‑jurisdiction expansion.

Market analysts emphasise that the dilution of available Bitcoin supply via institutional custody may tighten free float and reduce volatility. With one entity holding a fifth of the publicly held Bitcoin, even modest inflows from public companies or IBIT could exert noticeable price effects.

A shift in supply concentration also raises systemic questions. As BlackRock and corporate treasuries secure larger holdings, the dynamics of price discovery may move away from retail and miner-driven liquidity pools. On‑chain analytics firms suggest emerging demand imbalance between supply locked in long‑term institutional wallets and tradable supply available to speculative or transactional buyers.

Critics argue that increasing centralisation challenges the decentralised ethos of Bitcoin. The risk is that a few large custodians could accrue disproportionate influence over market flows and network sentiment. Proponents counter that regulated trust models and robust custody reduce systemic risk and enhance asset legitimacy among institutional participants.

IBIT’s fee structure is also under scrutiny in comparison to competing ETFs. At 0.25 per cent, it positions itself competitively against alternatives, though slightly higher than passive gold or broad‑market ETFs. Nevertheless, institutional investors appear willing to pay a premium for regulatory certainty and deep liquidity.

Speculation is mounting around BlackRock’s next moves. The firm is reportedly exploring tokenised treasury products across other asset classes, including corporate bonds and money‑market instruments. Observers suggest that if IBIT’s performance continues, similar frameworks could be deployed for Ethereum or thematic digital‑asset baskets.

As rivals respond, competition intensifies. Fidelity’s FBTC and Grayscale’s GBTC have begun marketing enhancements and lower fees. Field analysts expect them to intensify efforts, particularly as Bitcoin continues to test and potentially surpass all‑time high prices near $112,000.

The Hang Seng’s advance reflected a growing belief that US and Chinese officials are making progress toward resolving key trade disputes. Early talks aimed at addressing tariffs, technology restrictions, and investment barriers have led investors to anticipate a thawing in one of the most consequential economic standoffs globally. The improving trade dialogue appears to be encouraging capital inflows into Hong Kong-listed shares, particularly in sectors sensitive to cross-border trade such as technology, manufacturing, and finance.

Market experts highlight that investor focus remains fixed on the trajectory of these negotiations, with any breakthroughs potentially unlocking significant value in the region’s equities. The rally also aligns with a more cautious but hopeful stance among traders that a prolonged trade conflict could ease, bolstering global economic growth prospects. Notably, blue-chip stocks led the gains, signalling confidence among institutional investors betting on recovery and expansion in the Asia-Pacific markets.

Conversely, Bitcoin’s performance diverged, as the leading cryptocurrency grappled with pressure from both macroeconomic and regulatory fronts. The digital asset has faced downward momentum partly due to investor apprehensions over persistent inflationary pressures in the United States. Inflation data remains a key focal point, as higher consumer prices could prompt the Federal Reserve to sustain or accelerate interest rate hikes, tightening liquidity conditions and dampening risk appetite in speculative assets.

Bitcoin’s volatility has also been compounded by shifting regulatory attitudes worldwide. Authorities in various jurisdictions are intensifying scrutiny of digital currencies, citing concerns over money laundering, market manipulation, and financial stability risks. Such regulatory tightening has contributed to a cautious investor approach, limiting Bitcoin’s ability to capitalize on broader risk-on sentiment seen in equities.

Analysts note that while Bitcoin has often been viewed as a potential inflation hedge, its correlation with traditional risk assets has increased, causing it to react sensitively to shifts in monetary policy and global economic uncertainty. This evolving dynamic challenges the narrative of cryptocurrencies as safe havens, complicating portfolio strategies for institutional and retail investors alike.

The Hang Seng’s rally has benefited from strong performances in technology companies listed in Hong Kong. Giants in the semiconductor and telecommunications sectors saw their share prices rise amid speculation that easing trade tensions could reduce supply chain disruptions and promote cross-border business activities. Additionally, financial stocks gained momentum as optimism grew about improving economic fundamentals and potential credit growth in the region.

Meanwhile, traders are closely monitoring upcoming US inflation reports, which could significantly influence market direction. Persistent inflation could lead the Federal Reserve to maintain a hawkish stance, thereby exerting downward pressure on risk assets including equities and cryptocurrencies. Conversely, signs of easing inflation could provide further impetus for market rallies and reduce volatility.

Hong Kong’s role as a financial gateway between China and the global economy continues to underpin investor confidence. The city’s markets are seen as a barometer for broader regional economic health, and the Hang Seng’s rise signals expectations that cross-border trade and investment flows will stabilise or improve amid diplomatic progress. This optimism is tempered by awareness of ongoing geopolitical risks, including Taiwan tensions and global supply chain uncertainties.

Bitcoin’s challenges underscore the growing complexity of the global investment landscape, where traditional and emerging asset classes are influenced by an intertwined set of economic, regulatory, and geopolitical factors. While the cryptocurrency market remains dynamic, its path forward appears increasingly contingent on external economic conditions rather than solely on technological or adoption milestones.