News related to
Meta

The multimedia framework FFmpeg has been awarded a $100,000 grant by the FLOSS/fund initiative, marking a significant injection of resources into a project that underpins video and audio processing worldwide. The grant is part of the organisation’s second tranche for 2025, delivered by FLOSS/fund—a programme launched by the brokerage firm Zerodha to bolster Free and Open Source Software projects globally.

FFmpeg, which is instrumental in powering platforms from online streaming services to editing suites, has long faced sustainability challenges despite its ubiquity in digital infrastructure. The project’s official handle confirmed receipt of the donation, describing it as “a step forward to a sustainable future for Open Source Software.” Meanwhile, FLOSS/fund’s blog revealed that the second tranche totals $675,000, bringing its total disbursement for the year to $1 million including the $325,000 committed earlier. Among the recipients alongside FFmpeg are notable projects such as Blender, OpenStreetMap and Wireshark.

The decision signals a wider trend in which tech-sovereignty and infrastructure resilience are being framed as strategic priorities. In its anniversary post, FLOSS/fund’s leadership emphasised that the typology of “Mutual Assured Sustenance” will—unlike traditional arms-race logic—apply in software ecosystems: interdependence rather than deterrence. With this context, the fund sees itself as a “global initiative with Indian roots”, citing India’s growing role in open source ecosystems.

Behind the scenes, the mechanics of funding remain complex. The blog post acknowledged that although the full amount has been committed, only $195,000 of the first tranche has been disbursed due to cross-border regulatory and tax paperwork. The timetable from announcement to actual transfer spans four to sixteen weeks, driven by varying jurisdictional requirements. The fund is working on a partnership with GitHub Sponsors to simplify payment flows.

The selection process for recipients is also non-traditional: rather than a formal application, projects publish a “funding. json” manifest detailing their finances and needs. The fund curators review the open-directory listings and pick recipients based on criteria such as “critical technical infrastructure”, adoption, and uniqueness of the project. It noted that diversity of projects—from developer libraries to humanitarian-tech tools—makes comparison difficult but unavoidable.

FFmpeg now joins a cohort of 29 projects selected in this tranche. The fund’s leadership stated that the grant does not “solve the funding problems behind FFmpeg and open source in general”, but underlined its symbolic and practical value. Analysts note that while a single donation will not fundamentally shift open-source economics, the move may prompt other large-scale users of open-source components to follow suit.

Industry observers credit the decision in part to shifting attitudes within the enterprise and government sectors. As digital dependency deepens, the risk of under-funded foundational tools becomes more visible. FLOSS/fund’s commentary suggested that countries such as India would benefit from a sovereign open-source fund administered in collaboration with the community—a concept that remains aspirational but gaining traction.

Corporations that derive value from open-source software may face increasing moral and strategic pressure to contribute back. Zerodha founder Nithin Kamath has publicly stated that “without open source software, there would be no Zerodha” and that supporting open-source infrastructure is in the best interests of both companies and states. That statement underscores the larger narrative at work: that critical digital infrastructure must be supported not just by users, but by the ecosystem as a whole.

Engineering firm ABB India has announced a 25 per cent increase in the production capacity of variable speed drives at its Peenya facility in Bengaluru. The expansion involves a newly installed production line equipped with advanced automation and sensor-based monitoring, and is aimed at boosting local manufacturing, reducing lead times and supporting domestic industry sectors such as buildings, data centres, water, cement and metal processing.

The new manufacturing line is reported to slash lead-times by up to 40 per cent while enabling more customer-specific configuration of high-power drives. According to AR Madhusudan, Business Line Manager, Drive Products at ABB India, “As we mark two decades of drives production in India, this expansion reinforces our strong commitment to advancing local production capabilities and delivering energy-efficient technologies for India’s industries.” The upgrade is said to align with the country’s wider ‘Atmanirbhar Bharat’ and ‘Make in India’ initiatives and reflect the Group’s deployment of Industry 4.0-style automation.

The enhanced line integrates robotics for the assembly of key components and digital monitoring tools for real-time visibility of operations, designed to boost productivity while reducing manual handling and improving safety. Tuomo Hoysniemi, Division President for Drive Products in ABB Motion, stated the move supports the firm’s global push to help industries become leaner and cleaner by localising production and strengthening ecosystem proximity to customers.

Driven market demand for energy-efficient drives has been growing rapidly, as industries seek to reduce electricity consumption and enhance operational performance. VSDs allow electric motors to adjust speed to match demand, which in turn lowers energy use and improves process control. ABB’s upgrade adds capacity for large-power-rated drives to meet higher performance needs in key industry verticals.

The decision to bolster local manufacturing forms part of ABB’s broader global strategy. The firm has previously stated it aims to achieve over 90 per cent local production in key markets including India, to mitigate supply-chain risk and respond more nimbly to demand. Outside India, ABB has increased investment in the U. S. and Europe to expand local production capacity for electrification equipment and industrial automation.

Industry analysts note that with growing pressure on carbon emissions as well as rising electricity costs, the demand for high-efficiency drives is set to rise steadily. Manufacturing localisation also delivers benefits such as reduced logistics cost, faster service and improved customisation, especially when the line can deliver “made-to-order” drives to match client specifications.

In India, the upgrade is also timed with the global celebrations by ABB of 50 years of innovation in drives and two decades of drives production in India. The move is expected to strengthen ABB India’s position among competitors in the domestic automation market, in which other firms are also investing in local ecosystem capabilities and digital manufacturing.

However, challenges remain. While localisation reduces lead times and improves responsiveness, it also requires ongoing investment in workforce skills, digital infrastructure and supply-chain resilience. The extent to which the upgraded line will translate into significantly higher market share for ABB India or broader cost advantages remains to be seen. Similarly, customer uptake may depend on the long-term savings delivered by the drives and the availability of after-sales support in the regions targeted.

Gold regained momentum as the US dollar’s slide and expectations of a shift in Federal Reserve policy helped lift the metal above the psychologically important $4,000-per-ounce mark. Spot gold rose around 0.7 % to $4,009.39 per ounce, while US gold futures for December delivery edged up to $4,022.10. At the same time, broader factors have introduced both bullish and cautionary signals to the market.

Investor interest is rekindled by the weaker dollar, which makes gold relatively cheaper for buyers holding other currencies, and by widespread anticipation that the Fed will adopt a more dovish stance. The dollar index fell roughly 0.1 % as markets weighed the possibility of rate cuts. At the same time, certain easing in trade-tensions between the US and China has slightly reduced gold’s role as a safe-haven asset. The confluence of these opposing forces has begun to shape a more nuanced outlook for the metal.

Analysts say that the rebound above $4,000 should not be taken as a strong bullish assurance yet. While the technical bounce signals renewed buying interest, momentum must be supported by fundamentals. One market commentator observed that “buyers who were waiting on the sidelines for gold are now being tempted into taking positions at these price levels. Also, we are seeing a bit of softness from the dollar, which is giving gold a reprieve”.

The wider context shows that gold has already surged markedly this year, up more than 50 % in 2025, and reached a record high near $4,381.21 in mid-October. The rally has been fuelled by a combination of geopolitical anxiety, central-bank buying and expectations of monetary easing. But the pull-back seen earlier this week underscores that investor discipline and macro clarity are still required for any sustained rise.

Emerging trends in the market reveal more structural undercurrents. Research from noted finance academics suggests that gold’s role is evolving: it may increasingly function as a high-quality liquid asset, competing with traditional safe-havens and benefiting from de-dollarisation in global reserves. But at the same time, some firms argue the rally may be overstretched: one analysis warned that with gold already up so sharply this year, its next move could be a “mini-bust,” with projections that prices might fall toward $3,500 by 2026 if support from central-bank demand weakens.

Forecasts for 2026 have also shifted. A poll of analysts and traders indicates a median expectation that average gold prices will exceed $4,000 per ounce next year – a milestone in itself – although forecasts vary widely, reflecting both optimism and caution. On the upside, institutions such as Goldman Sachs remain bullish, pointing to potential further gains on the back of monetary accommodation and geopolitical risk. On the downside, if trade tensions ease and inflation moderates, some believe gold could correct.

The interplay between stimulus expectations and dollar dynamics remains crucial. A softer dollar supports gold, but if authorities signal confidence in economic recovery and maintain higher interest rates, gold’s appeal could diminish because it offers no yield. Additionally, the safe-haven narrative is under pressure as expectations of improved US-China relations gain traction, which may lower investors’ impetus to hold gold purely for risk hedging.

Strength in demand from global central banks has supported prices thus far, but market watchers caution that this may face constraints as gold holdings rise and incremental purchases become harder. For now, the up-move above $4,000 may signal a tentative buying opportunity for traders who believe a rate-cut cycle is on the horizon. For longer-term investors though, vigilance remains essential, as valuations are elevated and market dynamics could shift rapidly.

A partnership between the investment firm Orion Resource Partners, the U. S. International Development Finance Corporation and sovereign investor ADQ has launched a major critical-minerals fund, mobilising an initial $1.8 billion in capital with a target of up to $5 billion to support supply-chain development of essential raw materials. The initiative, known as the Orion Critical Mineral Consortium, aims to invest in and scale near-term producing assets for minerals such as copper, cobalt and rare earths, in line with partner-government industrial and security goals. The DFC has confirmed its cornerstone commitment, matched by funds managed by Orion and ADQ, creating the foundation of the expanding pool of capital.

The fund emerges amid heightened concern in Washington over the concentration of critical-minerals processing in rival economies and the lag in Western investment, with deferred permitting, falling ore grades and decelerating mine-development pipelines cited as systemic pressures. Orion, which manages around $8 billion in assets and has global mining-finance experience, brings its platform into the consortium, while ADQ’s prior joint venture with Orion—announced earlier this year for $1.2 billion—provides a blueprint for the strategic partnership. The fresh consortium will prioritise assets capable of delivering supply within a shorter timeframe rather than frontier exploration, signalling a shift towards faster-payback, lower-development-risk opportunities.

The strategic calculus ties directly into U. S. national-security and industrial-policy ambitions. “Securing critical minerals is a paramount matter of U. S. strategic interest and economic prosperity,” said DFC CEO Ben Black. Orion founder and CEO Oskar Lewnowski described the consortium as a “bridge” between emerging-market production jurisdictions and advanced-manufacturing demand in the U. S. and among allies. The fund will focus on eligible jurisdictions for DFC investment and will integrate production, processing and offtake structures.

The $1.8 billion commitment represents the current scale of the vehicle, with Orion CMC envisaged to grow further as aligned investors join. Observers note that while the headline target is $5 billion, execution will depend on securing suitable assets, navigating permitting and securing host-nation partnerships. The model mirrors the earlier ADQ-Orion joint venture launched in January, which committed to deploy $1.2 billion over its first four years across metals-and-mining investments in Africa, Asia and Latin America.

For Orion and ADQ, this represents an expansion of their earlier alliance: the Abu Dhabi-based JV served both to secure long-term resource links and to align with ADQ’s infrastructure-and-critical-minerals cluster. For the U. S., the consortium marks one of the largest private-sector-linked initiatives in the critical-minerals domain, aligning DFC’s mandate of mobilising private capital abroad with the administration’s aim to reduce strategic vulnerabilities in supply chains.

Challenges remain. Mining projects are long-horizon endeavours, and merely committing funds does not guarantee results. Host-country regulatory regimes, permitting timelines, environmental and social governance constraints and market-price volatility all play roles in investment outcomes. Industry analysts caution that while the push for supply-chain resilience is timely, the gap between intent and delivery is sizeable. Even with $5 billion in capital, global demand for some critical minerals is projected to outstrip supply capacity.

Operationally, the consortium’s emphasis on “existing or near-term producing assets” rather than early-stage exploration is intended to accelerate results and mitigate development risk. That strategy reflects frustration in industry circles with projects that take a decade or more to bring into production. The presence of sovereign-wealth capital, allied-government backing and private-sector mining-finance expertise may create a differentiated pathway for this fund compared with earlier, traditional mining-investment funds.

The Bank of England has committed to implementing a comprehensive regulatory framework for stablecoins by the end of 2026, signalling a significant shift in the United Kingdom’s approach to digital assets. According to government and central-bank sources, a formal consultation is scheduled for 10 November and the regulation is expected to align closely with forthcoming U. S. standards.

The framework will establish new standards for so-called “qualifying stablecoins” issued in the UK, stipulating full backing by secure liquid assets held in trust, mandatory redemption at par, and authorisation under the Financial Conduct Authority. For stablecoins deemed systemic—particularly those used for payments at scale—the BoE will assume additional supervisory and resolution responsibilities. The FCA’s Consultation Paper CP25/14 sets out much of this detail.

In public remarks, BoE Governor Andrew Bailey argued that widely-used stablecoins must be regulated in the same way as banks if they function as money-substitutes. He said they should access Bank accounts and adhere to depositor-protection regimes. The BoE itself has described the future payments landscape as one of “multi-money” — where tokenised deposits, central bank money and stablecoins coexist—provided the framework protects trust and financial stability.

The proposed regulatory timetable is part of a broader drive by UK authorities to maintain competitive positioning in global fintech, particularly as stablecoins gain traction in cross-border payments and tokenised-asset ecosystems. Industry experts note that the UK wants to keep pace with U. S. regulation to avoid regulatory arbitrage.

Under the current design, issuers of qualifying stablecoins will need authorisation by the FCA, must safeguard assets backing the coins by placing them in statutory trust arrangements, and maintain daily reconciliation between issued coins and backing assets. The consultation suggests a two-tier backing-asset regime: “core” assets and “expanded” assets subject to extra disclosure and modelling requirements.

From a technical infrastructure perspective, the BoE highlights that stablecoins may reduce the banking sector’s dominance over payments, but that the central bank must remain the settlement asset for systemically important markets. This position underpins the planned consultations and policy work around stablecoins’ role in the UK payments system.

Industry reaction is mixed. Some fintech firms and crypto-asset service providers welcome clarity, saying that clear rules reduce uncertainty and support investment. Others worry that too heavy or complex regulation might deter innovation or prevent start-ups from competing with global incumbents. One blog commentary described the framework as “a huge deal … but a nagging worry that too much focus on compliance might throw a wet blanket on the very innovation they are meant to encourage.”

The stakes are high for tokenised deposit initiatives within the UK banking system. Leading lenders including HSBC, NatWest Group and Lloyds Banking Group are pushing ahead with pilots of tokenised deposits through 2026. Regulators have been clear that although such deposits may be permitted within the current system, the stablecoin regulatory regime must take into account the potential threat of massive deposit flows leaving the banking sector.

One key tension lies in the setting of holding limits. The BoE has proposed initial caps on stablecoin holdings—for individuals perhaps in the order of £10,000 to £20,000—and higher for business entities, on the grounds that a swift migration out of bank deposits could undermine credit flows to households and firms. The caps would remain until the BoE is confident the stablecoin sector does not pose a systemic threat.

In this regulated-fork approach, oversight will be shared: The BoE will supervise systemic stablecoin issuers; the FCA will regulate non-systemic stablecoins and issuers under the regulated activities order. The Treasury has indicated that stablecoin issuance will not, for now, be brought directly into payment-services regulation.

By K Raveendran     When Google announced that Visakhapatnam would be home to its $15 billion project to build the company’s first artificial intelligence hub in India, the news landed like a thunderclap across the southern states. For Andhra Pradesh, it was nothing short of a jackpot — a once-in-a-generation opportunity to rewrite the […]

The article Google’s AI Hub: Visakhapatnam’s Jackpot, South India’s Heartburn appeared first on Latest India news, analysis and reports on Newspack by India Press Agency).

By Nitya Chakraborty Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s diplomatic woes are mounting as Russian President Vladimir Putin’s proposed visit to India on December 5 and 6 is approaching. US President Donald Trump is determined to ensure substantial reduction in Indian imports of Russian oil by November and this has been linked with the progress of the […]

The article Narendra Modi’s Mounting Dilemma Over President Putin’s Visit To India In December appeared first on Latest India news, analysis and reports on Newspack by India Press Agency).

A new wave of supply-chain assaults has seen North Korean hackers publish more than 300 malicious npm packages, infecting developer systems with sophisticated malware that steals credentials and crypto assets. The campaign, known as “Contagious Interview,” exploits the trust developers place in open-source tools by cloaking malware inside packages mimicking legitimate ones.

The Socket Threat Research Team disclosed that attackers uploaded 338 malicious npm modules, collectively downloaded over 50,000 times, many featuring a newly observed loader named XORIndex. About 27 of them remain active in the npm registry. Within those packages, XORIndex collects host metadata and downloads a second-stage payload, BeaverTail, which in turn leverages a backdoor called InvisibleFerret to maintain persistence and exfiltrate data. This expansion follows a preceding June surge of 35 malicious modules using a HexEval loader.

Researchers emphasise that Contagious Interview is not a static campaign but a dynamic interplay between defenders and adversaries. As packages are taken down, attackers quickly reissue variants under fresh aliases or change loader techniques. The latest 67-package load pushed last month illustrates this cat-and-mouse escalation: the new modules alone exceeded 17,000 downloads. Attackers have mixed XORIndex and HexEval in parallel deployments, suggesting modular development and adaptability.

The campaign’s social engineering backbone remains key. Actors pose as recruiters or HR contacts on platforms like LinkedIn, targeting software engineers or job-seekers. They offer interview assignments that require cloning a GitHub or Bitbucket repository, with the malicious npm module embedded deep in the project. Because many developers run these projects outside sandboxed environments, the malicious loader quietly executes and bridges the gap to full system compromise.

Analysts attribute Contagious Interview to DPRK-aligned threat groups tracked under names such as CL-STA-0240, DeceptiveDevelopment, Tenacious Pungsan and Void Dokkaebi. The methodology aligns with patterns shown by the Lazarus Group and its affiliates, as attackers continue to weaponise open source ecosystems for espionage and financial theft. XorIndex and HexEval share infrastructure and tactics, including encrypted communication with command-and-control servers. In several cases, submitters of the malicious packages have crafted repository names containing “interview,” reflecting the campaign motif.

Beyond npm, the campaign’s reach extends: some modules reference Bitbucket repositories, and similar tactics have appeared in PyPI package attacks. The broader goal appears dual: accessing developer environments to steal intellectual property or credentials and siphoning cryptocurrencies from wallets detected on compromised machines.

Security firms and registry maintainers have responded with takedown requests and account suspensions. Socket reported removing six live HexEval-based modules earlier this year, and the npm security team has collaborated to suspend associated accounts. But defenders admit the reactive posture is fragile; attack waves resurface within hours.