News related to
digital

Smartphone makers in India have been instructed by the telecom ministry to preload a government-owned cybersecurity app on all new devices sold in the country, blocking users from deleting the application once installed. Under a directive issued on November 28, companies such as Apple, Samsung, Vivo, Oppo and Xiaomi have been given a 90-day window to ensure all handset models destined for India include the Sanchar Saathi app. For devices already in the retail pipeline or those awaiting sale, manufacturers must deliver the app via over-the-air software updates and ensure it appears prominently during first-use setup.

Authorities say the app plays a key role in telecom security by giving users tools to verify device authenticity through IMEI checks, report suspected thefts or fraud, and block lost or stolen phones. Since the app’s launch in January 2025, government data indicates it has helped recover over 700,000 lost devices and block millions of connections flagged as fraudulent. Officials argue that this move is critical to counter growing misuse of duplicate or tampered IMEI numbers—a problem that fuels scams and the resale of stolen phones across India’s vast second-hand device market.

This mandate marks the first time the government has required a permanently installed, non-removable application on all smartphones sold in the country. The decision reflects a broader tightening of regulatory oversight over telecom infrastructure and device authenticity, drawing parallels with security measures in other jurisdictions.

The requirement has triggered sharp criticism from technology companies and privacy advocates alike. For example, the policy of Apple prohibits pre-installation of third-party or government apps prior to device sale—an approach that could force the company to either seek exemptions or find workarounds. Industry representatives have warned that the mandate may strain compliance operations, increase production costs, and undermine relationships with handset vendors.

Beyond logistical concerns, digital rights groups argue the rule tramples on user consent and privacy. Critics contend that embedding a state-run app with potentially broad access on every phone amounts to unwarranted surveillance and sets a troubling precedent. Some lawmakers and civil liberties advocates dubbed the move “a Big Brother measure,” warning that once entrenched, such mandates could be expanded further, eroding individual privacy without adequate data-protection safeguards.

Regulators at the Federal Reserve are moving to formalise rules for stablecoins, signalling a shift in how banks may soon treat these digital assets under supervision. The Vice Chair for Supervision at the Fed, Michelle Bowman, emphasised that banks should be able to engage with digital currencies — including stablecoins — under new regulatory guardrails. She argued that existing regulations, many crafted in the aftermath of the 2008 financial crisis, may no longer be appropriate given how much the economy and technology have evolved. Her remarks came against the backdrop of recent legislation that lays the groundwork for stablecoin regulation, prompting an overhaul of existing frameworks to encourage innovation while managing risk.

The regulatory momentum follows the passage of the Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for U. S. Stablecoins Act — known as the GENIUS Act — which establishes a comprehensive legal framework for payment stablecoins. Under the law, issuers of stablecoins must back tokens on a one-to-one basis with U. S. dollars or other low-risk assets, provide regular disclosure of reserves, and maintain transparent redemption processes. This marks a turning point: stablecoins officially enter the regulated financial system, opening the door for banks and other financial institutions to participate under defined standards.

Bowman has signalled that the Federal Reserve, alongside agencies such as the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency and the FDIC, intends to craft tailored supervisory guidelines rather than impose a one-size-fits-all regulatory model. She has called for regulators to abandon what she described as an “overly cautious mindset” that has slowed the banking sector’s ability to embrace digital innovation. According to her, banks seeking to engage in stablecoin activities must separate those assets from their traditional banking operations. This segregation, she said, is necessary to preserve the safety and soundness of the banking system even as banks expand into digital asset services.

The move has drawn cautious optimism from some quarters of the financial world, particularly among proponents of digital assets and stablecoin issuers, who view increased regulatory clarity as critical for broader adoption. They argue that a well-designed framework will enable mainstream financial institutions to offer digital asset services, increasing legitimacy and liquidity in the stablecoin market. Analysts point to academic research suggesting stablecoins have evolved from niche cryptocurrency experiments to integral components of payments infrastructure worldwide — with stablecoins’ market capitalisation estimated to exceed several hundred billion dollars. Some experts have proposed hybrid models that combine fiat-backed stablecoins with central-bank anchored systems to mitigate liquidity risks and improve stability, particularly in volatile market conditions.

At the same time, concerns remain about potential threats to financial stability. Regulators such as the Fed must weigh the risk of deposit outflows, competition between banks and non-bank issuers, and the challenge of preventing money-laundering or illicit finance through digital assets. Financial supervisors globally are wrestling with how to calibrate capital requirements and risk-weighting rules for banks engaging with stablecoins and digital tokens — taking into account factors like volatility, liquidity stress, and redemption risk.

Strategy, the publicly traded firm widely known for holding the largest corporate stash of Bitcoin, has drawn a line under doubts over its ability to meet dividend and debt obligations without selling crypto by creating a $1.44 billion U. S.-dollar reserve backed by share sales. This move reflects a deeper shift in the company’s risk management as the digital-asset market endures sharp price swings.

According to disclosures, the cash reserve was funded through the company’s at-the-market sales program, under which Strategy issued new Class A common stock in November, raising nearly $1.5 billion. Those proceeds now serve to fund preferred stock dividends and interest payments on outstanding convertible debt, obligations that had sparked investor concern amid a steep slide in Bitcoin valuations.

Alongside the cash build-up, Strategy added another 130 Bitcoin to its holdings, raising its total cache to 650,000 BTC — reaffirming its long-term bullish stance even as market conditions deteriorate. Executive chairman Michael Saylor reiterated commitment to Bitcoin as core to the firm’s identity, signalling confidence that the underlying asset remains a compelling store of value despite pressure.

Still, Strategy trimmed its fiscal-year 2025 guidance on operating income and diluted earnings per share, reflecting the volatile environment. Earlier projections assumed a markedly higher Bitcoin price range; the company now expects end-of-year BTC valuations between $85,000 and $110,000, a significant downgrade from prior assumptions near $150,000. Analysts caution this wide range introduces considerable uncertainty for cash-flow forecasts and valuation models.

The need for a cash reserve stems from one of the harshest drawdowns Bitcoin has faced this year. Bitcoin surged past $126,000 in early October but surrendered those gains over the subsequent weeks. The broader crypto sell-off, combined with liquidity constraints and high correlation between digital assets and riskier financial instruments, has erased much of the 2025 rally.

Industry-wide, firms that built large digital-asset treasuries this year are now navigating amplified risk. A recent study modelling “Digital Asset Treasury” companies warns that those relying solely on mark-to-market gains are especially vulnerable in bear markets — a problem compounded when accounting for debt and fixed-income obligations. The authors argue that cash-flow generation independent of crypto price swings, such as fee-based services on payment rails, could offer a path to stability; for now, Strategy’s cash reserve seems to be its principal line of defence.

Market reaction was swift. Shares of Strategy dropped more than 10 per cent following the announcement, extending a decline that has taken the stock down over 50 per cent in 2025. Some investors remain unconvinced that the company’s liquidity buffer is sufficient, pointing to its substantial convertible debt load and the challenge of generating recurring operational revenue. Others see the reserve as a pragmatic step — a signal that Strategy is prioritising financial resilience over ideological purity.

Government of India has broadened access to advanced semiconductor design by enabling universities across the country to use industry-grade Electronic Design Automation tools and Multi-Project Wafer fabrication services under the Chips to Start-up Programme. At a handover event at Semiconductor Laboratory, Mohali saw 28 chips—comprising 600 bare dies and 600 packaged units—designed by students from 17 institutions returned to their teams. Officials confirmed that 122 design tape-outs from 46 institutions were processed over the past year through five MPW shuttles, with over 175 lakh hours of EDA usage logged by more than 380 academic and research organisations via the ChipIN Centre.

Union Minister for Electronics & Information Technology, Railways and Information & Broadcasting, Ashwini Vaishnaw, described the effort as a transformation of India’s semiconductor landscape, arguing the shift empowers students and researchers to work with the same tools global chipmakers use and turns campuses into active nodes of chip innovation and design. SCL and ChipIN’s collaboration enables institutions to prototype, validate and manufacture chips under one integrated workflow—from design to wafer fabrication and packaging.

Analysts note that this initiative addresses previous barriers faced by academic institutions seeking to explore integrated circuit design, where lack of access to expensive EDA licences and manufacturing services often made projects unviable. By providing a centralised national facility, the government is effectively building a talent pipeline and offering practical exposure to chip fabrication, potentially reducing India’s reliance on foreign design and fabrication services over time.

The rollout comes against the backdrop of a wider push to develop domestic semiconductor manufacturing capabilities. Plans to upgrade SCL with an injection of ₹4,500 crore aim to expand fabrication capacity nearly hundred-fold and advance manufacturing to smaller nodes, reinforcing the analog and digital production backbone that the academic chip designs will feed into. Combining design empowerment with fabrication capacity creates a rare integrated ecosystem where chip concept can travel from whiteboard to silicone within the country.

Start-ups too are benefitting: institutions under C2S and ChipIN aren’t limited to student projects but include over 90 young companies. These entities logged about 50 lakh hours of EDA use, indicating that the programme serves both academic and commercial ambitions. Sector analysts suggest that with incentives under the broader India Semiconductor Mission—including design-linked and deployment-linked incentives—this could accelerate design work in fields such as 5G, electric vehicles, AI, industrial automation and defence electronics.

Crypto markets endured a sharp shake-out as leveraged positions worth roughly $800 million were liquidated within a single 24-hour span, wiping out a wave of long bets across major digital assets.

The dump was triggered when Bitcoin slipped below a key price threshold, pressuring highly leveraged long positions on futures markets and prompting a cascade of forced sell-offs. Platforms such as Hyperliquid and Bybit reportedly absorbed the majority of the liquidations, underscoring how overextended trader leverage remains widespread even after prior volatility.

Data compiled by derivatives-monitoring firms shows hundreds of thousands of traders saw their positions wiped out, reflecting a broad-based unwind rather than a handful of large outliers. Long positions accounted for the lion’s share of the losses, a pattern that analysts argue deepens near-term downside risk while simultaneously resetting excessive leverage.

Market participants suggest the liquidation sequence was worsened by macroeconomic uncertainty. Signals from major central banks hinting at tighter monetary policy have quelled risk appetite, undermining speculative crypto bets built on hopes of renewed easy capital. A stronger dollar and rising bond yields weighed on crypto sentiment and intensified pressure on leveraged positions.

Declines weren’t limited to Bitcoin. Ethereum and other large-cap altcoins also suffered sharp drawdowns as falling prices triggered liquidation cascades across the derivatives market. As leverage unwinding rippled through the system, traders who had bet on a sustained rebound found themselves among the hardest hit.

Some investors framed this purge of leverage as a potential reset for the crypto market. Clearing out excessive long exposure might pave the way for more stable price action if broader buying support returns. Others, however, cautioned that forced liquidations could destabilise confidence and deepen volatility — especially if macro headwinds persist.

China’s central bank has reaffirmed its prohibition on cryptocurrency use and announced a renewed enforcement drive targeting stablecoins and underground trading networks. At a high-level interagency meeting convened in Beijing by the People’s Bank of China, officials declared that all virtual currencies remain outside the legal tender framework and insisted that any related business activity constitutes illicit financial conduct.

The PBOC underscored heightened concerns over what it described as a resurgence in speculative trading and misuse of stablecoins. According to the statement delivered at the meeting, stablecoins fail to meet mandatory requirements for identity verification and anti-money-laundering safeguards — deficiencies that increase their vulnerability to use in fraud, money laundering and unauthorised cross-border transfers.

China outlawed trading and mining of cryptocurrencies in 2021, with regulators barring financial institutions and intermediaries from facilitating such activity. The current announcement makes explicit that the ban also extends to stablecoins — digital assets whose value is typically pegged to fiat currencies or other claims — signalling a shift from broad prohibition to more specific targeting.

Officials from thirteen government agencies, including judicial and cyberspace regulatory bodies, participated in the enforcement meeting, indicating that anti-crypto efforts are being treated as a coordinated, cross-sector priority. The agencies pledged to intensify monitoring, crack down on underground trading platforms, clamp down on illicit payment flows and coordinate information sharing across law enforcement and regulatory bodies.

The renewed clampdown comes even as some on-the-ground activity suggests partial revival of mining in certain energy-rich provinces, driven by low electricity costs and data-centre growth. Reports indicate that a segment of cryptocurrency miners have quietly restarted operations despite the 2021 ban, suggesting enforcement may be uneven across China’s vast terrain.

Regulators framed the move as necessary to safeguard financial and economic stability, citing recent upticks in speculation, fraud and illegal cross-border capital flows linked to virtual currencies. The articulation of fresh enforcement measures and explicit inclusion of stablecoins reflects a shift in China’s regulatory approach — from discouragement to active suppression.

Given the global ripple effects of China’s policy, observers expect tightening enforcement to influence not only domestic underground markets but also international crypto platforms, stablecoin issuers and cross-border payment flows that might involve Chinese users or capital.

UAE and Saudi Arabia are embarking on sweeping reforms to reshape their healthcare and life-sciences sectors, opening the door to expanded private-sector participation, foreign investment and rapid technological adoption across the region.

Legal changes in the UAE have restructured the regulatory framework for medical products, pharmacies and pharmaceutical establishments under updated laws that strengthen protections and streamline compliance. These alterations aim to catalyse domestic pharmaceutical manufacturing and support a growing life-sciences ecosystem, signalling government intent to shift from reliance on imports to building a robust local industry. The reforms dovetail with a broader healthcare strategy that encourages research, innovation and long-term capacity building in biotechnology and medical technology.

Parallel reforms in Saudi Arabia have dramatically altered the investment climate. Regulatory adjustments now allow 100 per cent foreign ownership of healthcare facilities including hospitals, polyclinics and telehealth centres. This change aligns with government objectives under its economic diversification plan, which seeks to raise private-sector involvement from roughly 40 per cent today to nearly 65 per cent by 2030. Licensing procedures for new medical facilities and services are being streamlined and digitised to offer greater transparency and efficiency, thereby lowering entry barriers for both domestic and international investors.

Market data underscore the scale of transformation. Industry forecasts suggest that overall healthcare and life-sciences investment across Gulf countries could rise sharply, supported by demographic changes, growing demand for chronic-care and geriatric services, and increased appetite for digital health and preventive medicine. In the UAE, life-sciences clusters are being developed to host pharmaceutical and medical-device companies, while production of biosimilars and expansion of research facilities indicate a strategic push to localise supply chains.

Digital health and health-tech are playing a central role in this transformation. Both nations are investing in national platforms for unified electronic health records, AI-powered diagnostics, and telemedicine services designed to expand access to care and improve efficiency. These efforts are complemented by regulatory frameworks that encourage medical innovation and private–public partnerships, creating environments where start-ups and established firms alike can experiment with new models of care delivery.

Despite broad optimism, some challenges remain. Large-scale hospital projects still face regulatory and approval delays, even as efforts are underway to simplify licensing and reduce bureaucratic hurdles. In Saudi Arabia, private investors must navigate evolving cultural and regulatory norms, especially around areas such as reproductive medicine and biotechnology. Recruiting and retaining specialised medical professionals remains difficult, given relatively limited existing local expertise in certain advanced fields.

Although regulatory reforms lay the groundwork for growth, translating legal change into improved patient outcomes and equitable access will demand careful oversight. Ensuring quality across a rapidly expanding private healthcare market and balancing profitability with affordability will require rigorous standards, transparent governance and robust public-health planning.

Abu Dhabi is preparing to host what organisers describe as the world’s largest debut media and entertainment gathering, with the BRIDGE Summit 2025 scheduled to run from 8–10 December at the Abu Dhabi National Exhibition Centre. The summit is expected to draw more than 60,000 participants from around the globe and bring together over 400 speakers and 300 exhibitors under a single roof.

Organisers envisage BRIDGE as an immersive platform that merges content, technology, culture, and commerce, structured across seven thematic tracks: Media; Creator Economy; Music; Gaming; Tech & AI; Marketing; and Picture — the latter covering film, streaming, and visual storytelling. The schedule includes more than 300 activities: roughly 200 panels, 50 workshops and interactive showcases, masterclasses and matchmaking zones designed to connect creators, investors, policymakers and media platforms.

Participation confirmed by high-profile figures signals the summit’s global ambition. International actor, filmmaker and DJ Idris Elba will join the line-up, bringing his cross-sector experience in entertainment and advocacy to the Summit’s discussions. Alongside traditional media heavyweights and cultural leaders, the Summit aims to spotlight emerging voices in the digital creator economy. The Creator Economy track alone is slated to feature more than 80 global contributors across 50 sessions investigating how influence, ownership and monetisation are reshaping creative industries worldwide.

Central to the Summit’s narrative is the challenge facing modern media: trust, credibility and sustainability. As traditional broadcast gives way to streaming and social platforms, and as generative AI reshapes production, issues of editorial independence, content verification, audience dynamics and revenue stability are moving to the forefront. The Media track is expected to convene over 100 global editors, founders, policymakers and investors to discuss funding models, algorithmic distribution, content integrity and the very ethics of influence in media today. The Summit’s ambition is to provoke debate and propose frameworks that can guide media’s future in an era of rapid technological disruption.

Beyond content and discussion, BRIDGE is designed as a marketplace for partnerships — blending culture, commerce and policy. Conversations already under way include cross-sector collaborations between media companies, tech firms, venture capital, and energy and infrastructure players. For example, recent talks involving global tech leadership have highlighted an alignment of media innovation with digital infrastructure capacity and clean energy, reflecting how foundational resources are becoming integral to media’s next frontier.

For countries and organisations navigating the tension between creative independence, monetisation and regulatory frameworks, the Summit offers a testbed. Delegates include creators seeking sustainable revenue, investors eyeing cultural-sector returns, technology firms exploring policy-driven AI integration, and governments looking to harness media’s influence in soft power projection. That diversity suggests the Summit could influence not just entertainment and content markets, but regulatory norms, global standards, and potentially the geopolitics of information dissemination.

Attendance projections and speaker rosters aside, the Summit’s scale poses logistical and structural challenges. Managing 60,000 attendees across multiple tracks, workshops and networking zones demands rigorous coordination. Questions around equitable representation — of global South artists, independent creators and regional media voices versus established global brands — remain. Observers are watching whether BRIDGE can balance commercial ambition with inclusivity and whether media integrity and creative freedom will be genuine priorities.

If execution aligns with vision, BRIDGE Summit 2025 could mark a turning point for the media and entertainment industry — reimagining how content, community, technology and commerce converge in the coming decade.

Bahrain-based alternative investment firm Investcorp has agreed to sell its majority stake in the European fintech firm Shine to cloud-software group Cegid, marking the end of an eight-year partnership. The deal will be executed via Investcorp Technology Partners and comes nearly a decade after Investcorp first backed the Danish fintech, then known as Ageras. Financial terms remain undisclosed, and the sale awaits customary regulatory clearances.

Shine, headquartered in Copenhagen, operates across multiple European markets including France, the DACH region, the Netherlands and Denmark. The platform provides a broad suite of services for small and medium-sized businesses — covering business formation, digital banking, invoicing, accounting, and payroll. Under Investcorp’s stewardship, it expanded its reach and grew recurring revenues more than ten-fold, while completing nine acquisitions in its core regions.

Cegid — majority-owned by private equity firm Silver Lake — aims to integrate Shine into its Small Business division, positioning the combined entity as a pan-European “financial copilot” for SMEs and accountants. The merged platform is being designed to offer a unified, cloud-native, AI-driven ecosystem combining e-invoicing, accounting, business banking, payments, payroll, HR and tax compliance. The target user base across Europe is estimated at over one million SMBs and 15,000 accounting professionals.

Reflecting on the sale, Investcorp’s Head of Technology Partners and Chairman of Shine, Gilbert Kamieniecky, said the firm is proud of having supported Shine’s evolution “from a start-up with only a few million in revenue into a European leader and unicorn.” Shine’s co-founders, Rico Andersen and Martin Hegelund, expressed optimism about the next phase under Cegid, emphasising their ambition to deliver more advanced, scalable financial infrastructure to businesses across Europe.

For Cegid, adding Shine strengthens its footprint across key European markets and significantly boosts its SMB customer base, offering opportunities to deploy embedded finance solutions and streamline compliance workflows ahead of evolving e-invoicing and digital reporting mandates across the continent. The integration of Shine’s scalable technology stack with Cegid’s existing cloud and AI infrastructure underscores a strategic bet on digital transformation in SME finance and accounting.