News related to
trade

The product, built around a personal AI assistant called Mona, is being positioned as a “local-first” alternative to cloud-based generative AI tools. Rather than routing most tasks through remote servers, MonoClaw runs large language models on a user’s own Apple hardware, with the company saying the approach is designed to keep sensitive memory, session history and credentials under the user’s direct control.

Sentimento Technologies Limited, the Hong Kong engineering studio behind the product, describes MonoClaw as the city’s first managed local AI runtime environment for professional users. Its launch comes as businesses move from experimental chatbot use towards agentic AI systems that can monitor workflows, draft responses, prepare reminders and act on user-approved instructions across multiple workplace channels.

Mona is designed to work as a digital secretary across email, WhatsApp, Telegram and calendar-linked tasks. The system can identify action items in messages, prepare reply drafts, generate morning briefings, track pending approvals, surface relevant documents before meetings and flag deadlines. The company says the product ships with 160 pre-bundled professional skills, covering both business administration and personal task management.

Billy Zuo, co-founder and chief executive of Sentimento Technologies, said the shift from manual software operation to autonomous AI execution marked a wider change in workplace computing. He said many businesses adopting cloud AI still face concerns over data leakage and unpredictable subscription costs, arguing that a local-first model gives companies greater control over sensitive information and spending.

MonoClaw’s pricing reflects that positioning. The permanent software licence is priced at HK$28,888, with an early-bird offer of HK$25,888. Users must also provide compatible Apple hardware, such as a Mac mini M4 or iMac M4, with the Mac mini starting at about HK$6,099. The company handles installation, workflow configuration and validation, with payment structured through a 40 per cent deposit and 60 per cent balance after final delivery and verification.

That model differs from many AI software products that rely on monthly subscriptions, metered token use or cloud-service plans. Sentimento is pitching MonoClaw as a capital investment rather than an operating expense, a message likely to appeal to smaller firms that want clearer budgeting and lower recurring software exposure. The trade-off is a higher upfront cost and a hardware dependency that may limit adoption among users who prefer device-neutral or fully cloud-hosted systems.

Privacy and auditability are central to the product’s commercial pitch. MonoClaw uses local contextual memory, local runtime profiles, secret redaction and explicit approval gates for higher-risk actions. Mona is designed to request confirmation through messaging channels before executing sensitive commands, data changes or external actions. That “human-in-the-loop” structure reflects a broader concern in the AI sector: agents that are powerful enough to automate work also need firm boundaries, logs and user control.

Hong Kong’s technology ecosystem has been moving in the same direction. AI agents, local foundation models and governed automation have become more prominent in policy, research and enterprise discussions, with public and academic initiatives focusing on authorisation, traceability and risk controls. MonoClaw enters this environment as a commercial product for office users rather than a research platform, but its design mirrors the same debate over whether AI agents can be useful without creating new privacy and operational risks.

The launch also underscores a changing competitive field for productivity software. Major global platforms are embedding AI assistants into office suites, browsers, customer-service tools and enterprise resource systems. MonoClaw’s advantage, if it gains traction, will lie in its local deployment, Hong Kong-specific setup and promise of cost predictability. Its challenge will be proving that a local Mac-based assistant can match the reliability, integrations and performance of cloud-backed rivals while remaining simple enough for non-technical users.

Energy and infrastructure concerns add another layer to the product’s appeal. Cloud AI workloads have intensified scrutiny of data-centre electricity demand, cooling requirements and network dependence. MonoClaw argues that routine tasks such as inbox triage, drafting, reminders and meeting preparation can be handled on Apple Silicon at desk level, reducing reliance on remote inference for every interaction. The system can still use filtered cloud subprocesses for selected workloads, meaning its privacy and cost benefits will depend on how users configure and supervise each workflow.

As Singapore CBD office rents rise for a fifth consecutive quarter and vacancy hits a record low, CoWorkSpace aims to shield members from rent increases that flex operators typically pass through.

SINGAPORE – Media OutReach Newswire – 26 May 2026 – CoWorkSpace is conveniently located at 6 Raffles Quay #16-01, occupying an entire floor within the office tower and comprising more than 50 private suites designed for startups, SMEs, and established corporations across shipping, financial intermediaries, family offices, professional services, business consultancy, technology, and trade-related industries.

Hashtag: #ServicedOffice #Coworking #CoworkingSpace #RafflesQuay #RafflesPlace #SingaporeCBD #SGCBD #PrivateOffice #PrivateSuites #OwnerOperated #FlexibleWorkspace #BusinessAddress #SMESingapore #SGBusiness #CoWorkSpace

https://www.coworkspace.com.sg/
https://www.linkedin.com/company/coworkspacesg/
https://www.facebook.com/coworkspacesg/
https://www.instagram.com/coworkspacesg

The issuer is solely responsible for the content of this announcement.

About CoWorkSpace

CoWorkSpace is an owner-operated serviced office at 6 Raffles Quay #16-01 in Singapore’s Central Business District. The property offers over 50 private suites, giving startups, SMEs, and established corporations a prestigious address, fully sheltered access to Raffles Place and Downtown MRT stations, privacy, and flexible medium to long-term membership options. Industries served include shipping, financial intermediaries, family offices, professional services, business consultancy, technology, and trade-related industries. More information at CoWorkSpace Serviced Office.

By Nantoo Banerjee India’s economy is navigating severe stress. The impact of Persian Gulf war, high cost of imported crude oil, frequent upward adjustment of retail oil prices, rising commodity rates, soaring transportation costs, weakening Rupee and continuous exit of foreign portfolio investors (FPI) are posing a big challenge to the economy. The government appears […]

The article Rising Prices, Falling Rupee And FPI Exit Pose Big Challenge To Economy appeared first on Latest India news, analysis and reports on Newspack by India Press Agency).

Regulators have moved against Futu Securities International, Tiger Brokers and Longbridge Securities, accusing them of operating securities businesses on the mainland without approval, soliciting domestic clients and processing offshore trading orders in breach of securities, fund and futures rules. The action has disrupted a once-popular route for mainland investors seeking exposure to global technology stocks, Hong Kong initial public offerings and US-listed Chinese companies.

The China Securities Regulatory Commission and other agencies have ordered a two-year rectification programme aimed at closing unauthorised cross-border securities, futures and fund businesses. During the wind-down period, affected mainland clients will be allowed to sell existing holdings and withdraw money, but will not be permitted to make new purchases through the targeted channels.

The clampdown marks a sharp escalation from the regulatory warning issued in late 2022, when online brokers were told to stop opening new accounts for mainland investors and remove trading apps from domestic app stores. Existing clients had largely been allowed to continue trading, preserving a grey-zone channel that gave better-off retail investors access to overseas markets despite China’s capital controls.

Futu has disclosed a proposed penalty of about 1.85 billion yuan, while Tiger Brokers’ parent, UP Fintech Holding, faces penalties and confiscation of illegal income totalling more than 400 million yuan. Longbridge has said it will comply with rectification requirements and that client fund safety is not affected. Regulators have also indicated that illegal gains from related onshore and offshore entities will be confiscated, with final administrative decisions subject to formal procedures.

Market reaction was swift. Shares of Futu and UP Fintech fell sharply in US trading after the enforcement announcement, while pressure spread to parts of the Chinese ADR universe as investors assessed whether reduced mainland retail participation could weigh on offshore-listed stocks. Hong Kong market participants also began reassessing the impact on brokerage flows, custody transfers and IPO distribution.

Citic Securities has estimated that as much as HK$250 billion in assets in Hong Kong could be affected by the crackdown, with Futu accounting for a large portion. The figure underlines the scale of wealth that had moved through offshore brokerage platforms even after Beijing tightened scrutiny of capital outflows and online financial services.

Investors are now exploring alternatives, including moving positions by custodian transfer to licensed Hong Kong banking channels, using accounts with international banks, or relying on approved schemes such as Stock Connect, the Qualified Domestic Institutional Investor programme and Wealth Management Connect. Those channels, however, have limits on eligibility, investment scope, quotas and product access, making them less flexible than the digital brokerage platforms that gained popularity during the pandemic-era boom in US and Hong Kong equities.

Beijing’s concern is not only securities law compliance. The wider policy objective is to control capital outflows, strengthen oversight of retail investment activity and prevent unlicensed overseas institutions from marketing financial products inside the mainland. The campaign also aligns with efforts to support domestic capital markets, where authorities have been trying to stabilise sentiment and encourage household savings to flow into regulated local investment products.

For the brokers, the enforcement action threatens an important part of their client base. Futu and Tiger expanded rapidly by offering low-cost, mobile-first access to overseas securities, appealing to younger and wealthier mainland clients who wanted exposure beyond A-shares. Both companies have been diversifying into Hong Kong, Singapore, Japan, Australia and the United States, but mainland-linked business remains material to investor perceptions of their growth prospects.

The crackdown may also reshape Hong Kong’s role as a financial gateway. Licensed institutions could benefit from account transfers and higher compliance-driven demand, but regulators in the city are expected to scrutinise whether account-opening documents, residency claims and fund-transfer routes meet legal requirements. That could raise operational costs and slow onboarding for brokers and banks serving mainland-related clients.

Huang is expected to meet Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company chairman and chief executive C. C. Wei as Nvidia prepares a second-half production ramp for Vera Rubin, the next-generation platform that combines new Vera CPUs, Rubin GPUs, advanced memory and high-speed networking for rack-scale AI systems. The visit has drawn close attention because Nvidia’s product cycle is now tied more tightly than ever to Taiwan’s foundries, packaging houses, server assemblers and component suppliers.

Nvidia reported revenue of $81.6bn for the quarter ended April 26, up 85 per cent from a year earlier, with data-centre revenue reaching $75.2bn, up 92 per cent. The company also authorised an additional $80bn in share repurchases and raised its quarterly dividend to 25 cents a share from 1 cent, underscoring the scale of cash generation from the AI infrastructure boom.

Demand is being driven by cloud providers, AI model developers, enterprise customers and sovereign AI projects, all seeking clusters capable of training and running larger generative and agentic AI systems. Nvidia has described the buildout of “AI factories” as one of the largest infrastructure expansions in technology history, with its platform spanning chips, networking, systems software and reference designs for data centres.

Vera Rubin is expected to follow the Blackwell and Grace Blackwell generation, which is still being shipped in high volumes. That overlap is creating pressure across Taiwan’s supply chain because new capacity must support existing commitments while preparing for a platform with different requirements in advanced packaging, high-bandwidth memory integration, board assembly, cooling and system validation.

Huang has described Vera Rubin as potentially the biggest product ramp in Nvidia’s history and one of the largest technology manufacturing efforts Taiwan has handled. Industry estimates around the platform point to millions of parts across each system and the involvement of well over 100 Taiwan-based ecosystem partners, from chip fabrication and advanced packaging to printed circuit boards, power systems, connectors, thermal modules and final server integration.

TSMC remains central to the effort because Nvidia depends on its leading-edge process technology and advanced packaging capacity. The challenge is not limited to wafers. CoWoS and other packaging technologies have become strategic bottlenecks as AI accelerators require multiple logic dies, high-bandwidth memory stacks and dense interconnects. Any delay in packaging expansion can ripple through server production schedules, cloud deployment plans and Nvidia’s revenue timing.

Taiwan’s broader technology sector has become a critical artery for the global AI trade. TSMC, Foxconn, Quanta, Wistron, Wiwynn, Inventec and a dense network of specialist suppliers are competing to add capacity while dealing with constraints in land, power, water, skilled labour and equipment availability. The concentration gives Nvidia speed and engineering depth, but also exposes the company to geopolitical and operational risks.

China remains the clearest commercial setback. Huang has said US export controls have pushed Nvidia’s share of China’s advanced AI chip market to zero, a striking reversal for a company that once held a dominant position there. The restrictions have strengthened the opening for Huawei and other domestic suppliers, while leaving Nvidia dependent on whether Washington and Beijing allow compliant chips to be sold without triggering national-security objections.

That loss has not slowed Nvidia’s global momentum, but it has changed the composition of growth. Revenue is now increasingly concentrated in markets where hyperscale cloud companies, enterprise AI developers and governments are building large AI data centres outside China. For investors, the question is whether demand can keep absorbing each successive architecture at the scale implied by Nvidia’s guidance.

Nvidia forecast revenue of about $91bn for the current quarter, above market expectations, signalling that orders for AI infrastructure remain strong despite concerns about overcapacity, power shortages and the pace at which customers can monetise AI services. Operating expenses rose 49 per cent to $7.75bn, reflecting the growing cost of research, supply commitments and ecosystem investments needed to sustain the company’s lead.

Commerce and Industry Minister Piyush Goyal is scheduled to visit Canada from May 25 to 27, accompanied by around 150 business leaders for meetings in Ottawa and Toronto. The delegation is expected to include senior representatives from mining, energy, automotive, aerospace, manufacturing, pharmaceuticals, education and technology, with talks centred on investment, market access and the proposed Comprehensive Economic Partnership Agreement.

The visit comes as negotiators from both countries hold another round of discussions in Ottawa from May 25 to 29. Officials are working towards an early conclusion of the trade pact after formally relaunching negotiations this year. The agreement is intended to widen market access, reduce barriers and deepen supply-chain cooperation across sectors where both economies see strategic value.

Bilateral trade stood at nearly $9bn in 2024-25, modest in relation to the size of the two economies. Both governments have set a target of raising trade to $50bn by 2030, a goal that would require faster progress in goods, services, investment and energy cooperation. Canada is seeking stronger commercial links beyond its heavy dependence on the United States, while New Delhi is trying to secure reliable supplies of critical minerals, uranium, clean-energy technology and advanced manufacturing inputs.

Energy and minerals are expected to figure prominently in the discussions. Canada holds significant reserves of uranium, potash, lithium, nickel, cobalt and rare earth elements, all of which are relevant to New Delhi’s nuclear power, fertiliser security, electric mobility and electronics manufacturing plans. Earlier this year, the two sides announced a C$2.6bn uranium supply arrangement involving Cameco, giving fresh weight to talks on long-term clean-energy cooperation.

Market access will be another sensitive area. New Delhi wants wider entry for textiles, leather goods, processed foods, pharmaceuticals and services, while Canada is expected to push for opportunities in agriculture, energy, education, financial services and high-technology sectors. Businesses on both sides have argued that tariffs, standards, certification rules and mobility restrictions have limited the relationship despite strong people-to-people ties and a large diaspora in Canada.

The delegation also carries political significance. Relations deteriorated sharply in 2023 after Ottawa alleged involvement by New Delhi in the killing of Sikh separatist leader Hardeep Singh Nijjar in British Columbia. New Delhi rejected the allegation, and both sides expelled diplomats as the dispute spread into security, visa and intelligence cooperation. The strain interrupted trade talks and pushed commercial engagement into a lower gear.

A gradual reset began after political engagement resumed at senior levels. Canada’s Prime Minister Mark Carney invited Prime Minister Narendra Modi to the G7 summit in Alberta in June 2025, and the two governments subsequently restored channels for trade and strategic dialogue. Carney’s visit to India in March 2026 gave the relationship a clearer economic framework, including the signing of terms of reference for the trade pact and a commitment to expand cooperation in energy, technology, agriculture, education and defence-related sectors.

The May visit is designed to move that process from political signalling to business execution. Meetings with Canadian ministers, industry bodies and corporate leaders are expected to test where near-term agreements are possible, especially in sectors less vulnerable to political friction. Ottawa and New Delhi are also exploring cooperation in shipbuilding, pharmaceuticals, tourism and education, areas identified during earlier ministerial exchanges.

Canada’s interest is shaped by a broader effort to diversify export markets and reduce exposure to shifts in US trade policy. New Delhi, meanwhile, is looking for partners that can support its manufacturing expansion, clean-energy transition and mineral security. The fit is commercially evident, but negotiations are likely to remain complex because both sides have defensive interests in agriculture, labour mobility, procurement and regulatory standards.

For businesses, the scale of the delegation suggests a wider appetite to resume investment conversations that had slowed during the diplomatic dispute. More than 600 Canadian companies have a business presence in India, while firms from India have built interests in information technology, steel, automotive components, hospitality and financial services in Canada. Student mobility and professional services also remain important links, although visa and security concerns have added caution to the relationship.

The Tokyo-listed investment group has become one of the most closely watched proxies for AI demand after committing tens of billions of dollars to OpenAI and building exposure across chips, power infrastructure, robotics and data-centre supply chains. The latest rally extended a sharp two-session advance that added tens of billions of dollars to SoftBank’s market value, marking one of its strongest runs since the technology boom that first made the group a symbol of risk-taking capital.

Investor enthusiasm has been driven by two linked expectations. OpenAI is preparing for a confidential US initial public offering filing that could set up a listing as early as September, while SB Energy, a power and data-centre infrastructure company backed by SoftBank and OpenAI, has said it intends to confidentially file for a US IPO. Together, the developments have strengthened the market view that SoftBank’s private holdings may be moving closer to public-market price discovery.

SoftBank’s OpenAI position is the main driver of that reassessment. The group has invested $34.6bn in the ChatGPT maker since September 2024 and has agreed to make a further $30bn investment through SoftBank Vision Fund 2. Completion of those tranches would lift its cumulative investment to $64.6bn for an ownership interest of about 13 per cent. The preferred shares are designed to convert automatically into common shares if OpenAI completes an IPO or related listing transaction.

OpenAI’s valuation has become central to SoftBank’s investment case. The company was valued at $852bn in private markets and preliminary discussions around a listing have included the possibility of a valuation as high as $1tn. The company is also seeking to raise at least $60bn at the lower end of earlier discussions, reflecting the huge capital needs of frontier AI model development, data centres, chips and power supply.

The OpenAI bet has already reshaped SoftBank’s earnings profile. The group reported a sharp profit rebound, helped by valuation gains tied to OpenAI, and said cumulative gains on the investment had reached $45bn. Its annual profit of about ¥5tn was described by the company as the highest recorded by a Japanese company, underscoring how quickly Son’s AI strategy has altered investor perceptions after years of scrutiny over the Vision Fund’s uneven performance.

SB Energy has added another layer to the rally because its business sits at the intersection of AI and power infrastructure. Founded in 2019, the company develops large-scale energy and data-centre projects and has positioned itself to benefit from surging electricity demand linked to AI workloads. It has raised more than $18bn in project capital and has a portfolio of about 5 gigawatts of operating and under-construction energy assets.

The company’s January partnership with OpenAI under the Stargate initiative placed it inside a broader push to build AI and energy infrastructure in the United States. That has made SB Energy more than a conventional renewable power developer in the eyes of investors. Its appeal rests on the argument that AI expansion will require dedicated power generation, grid connections and purpose-built campuses capable of supporting high-density computing.

SoftBank’s rally has also been supported by strength in Arm Holdings, the UK chip designer in which the group holds a large stake. Arm remains a key public asset for SoftBank and is viewed as a beneficiary of AI-related semiconductor demand. Gains in Arm shares have helped reinforce confidence that SoftBank owns multiple assets tied to the same structural theme, rather than a single concentrated wager on OpenAI.

The optimism carries risks. OpenAI faces intensifying competition from Alphabet’s Gemini, Anthropic’s Claude and other model developers, while the cost of training and operating advanced AI systems continues to rise. Credit analysts have raised concerns that the size of SoftBank’s OpenAI commitment may affect liquidity and asset quality, particularly as the group uses loans, asset sales and financing backed by holdings such as Arm and SoftBank Corp. to fund its strategy.

SoftBank arranged a $40bn bridge loan in March and drew $20bn in April, largely for the OpenAI investment, while also repaying part of that borrowing. The group has sold stakes in holdings including Nvidia and T-Mobile, issued bonds and considered other financing options as it reallocates capital towards AI. Chief Financial Officer Yoshimitsu Goto has said the group may also explore ways to use its OpenAI assets for financing if market conditions allow.

Invest Qatar’s delegation, led by its chief executive Sheikh Ali bin Alwaleed Al-Thani, held executive-level meetings, site visits and closed-door business discussions with Chinese companies across advanced manufacturing, life sciences, industrial technologies and digital platforms. The engagements included WuXi Biologics, Shanghai SUS Environment, Cainiao Group and Ant International, placing the tour at the intersection of Qatar’s diversification agenda and China’s strengths in biotechnology, logistics, environmental services and digital finance.

The visit was designed to present Qatar as a platform for regional expansion, with Invest Qatar highlighting support for market entry, regulatory coordination, site selection, expansion planning and aftercare services. The pitch reflects Doha’s effort to move beyond energy-led ties and attract capital, technology and operational expertise into sectors linked to the Third National Development Strategy and Qatar National Vision 2030.

China already occupies a central place in Qatar’s external economic network. Bilateral cooperation spans energy, logistics, manufacturing, technology and financial services, while Qatar hosts about 520 Chinese companies. Over the 2017-2026 period, China has ranked among Qatar’s top 10 sources of foreign direct investment, with 59 projects generating more than $3bn in capital expenditure and creating more than 3,200 jobs across multiple sectors.

The Shanghai and Hangzhou programme signals a more targeted approach by Qatar’s investment promotion authorities. Rather than broad promotional activity, the delegation focused on companies that fit Qatar’s priority clusters. WuXi Biologics brings relevance to life sciences and contract research, Shanghai SUS Environment operates in waste-to-energy and environmental infrastructure, Cainiao Group is a major logistics and supply-chain player, and Ant International strengthens the digital payments and fintech dimension of the outreach.

Energy remains the anchor of Qatar-China economic relations. China is Qatar’s largest trading partner, with bilateral trade reaching $24.22bn in 2024. China exported goods worth about $4.17bn to Qatar and imported about $20.05bn, led by liquefied natural gas and industrial helium. Qatar is also China’s second-largest source of LNG imports, reinforcing the strategic weight of the relationship at a time when Asian demand remains central to global gas markets.

QatarEnergy’s expansion strategy has further tightened industrial links with China. Long-term LNG supply arrangements linked to the Chinese market, together with major vessel orders placed with Chinese shipbuilders, have created a broader commercial ecosystem around the North Field expansion. Qatar aims to raise LNG production capacity from 77mn tonnes a year to 142mn tonnes by 2030, a target that will require shipping, engineering, financing and downstream partnerships across Asia.

The investment outreach comes as Gulf states increasingly seek to use energy relationships as a foundation for wider economic cooperation with Asia. For Qatar, China offers scale, capital depth and technology capacity. For Chinese groups, Qatar provides political stability, strong transport connectivity, free-zone infrastructure and access to Gulf, African and South Asian markets.

Doha is also seeking to position itself as a business base for companies navigating a more fragmented global trade environment. Regulatory certainty, a relatively high-income market, advanced digital infrastructure and a sovereign investment ecosystem give Qatar tools to compete for regional headquarters, specialised manufacturing and services projects. The challenge will be converting exploratory meetings into project commitments in sectors where regional competition is intense, particularly from Saudi Arabia and the UAE.

Financial services form another important strand of the relationship. Qatar Investment Authority’s moves in China’s asset management sector and broader Gulf interest in Asian financial markets point to a shift from passive portfolio exposure towards more strategic investment channels. That trend could support new capital-market links, fintech partnerships and investment vehicles connecting Doha and Chinese financial centres.

The latest Invest Qatar tour also reflects a diplomatic-economic strategy that has become more visible across Asia. Qatar has sought to deepen ties with major economies while keeping its partnerships diversified across the United States, Europe, China and other Asian markets. This balancing approach allows Doha to pursue commercial opportunities while avoiding excessive dependence on any single investment corridor.

For Chinese companies, Qatar’s offer is strongest where national development goals align with corporate expansion plans. Life sciences companies can tap healthcare investment and research partnerships, logistics operators can link into Hamad Port, Hamad International Airport and regional re-export networks, and digital platforms can benefit from a market that has been investing in cashless payments, cloud services and smart-city infrastructure.