News related to
ISIS

Russian President Vladimir Putin will visit India in the coming weeks, with expectations that the trip will significantly bolster bilateral relations across various sectors, including trade, defence, and energy. The visit, anticipated to be a key moment in Russia-India relations, will occur amid shifting geopolitical dynamics, particularly following the global attention on the ongoing war in Ukraine and its implications for international alliances.

The timing of the visit is critical, as both Russia and India seek to expand their strategic cooperation. Over the past few years, both nations have deepened their partnership through numerous agreements aimed at enhancing their economic and military ties. As global power dynamics continue to shift, the Russia-India alliance has become increasingly important, not just for the two countries but also within the broader context of the BRICS grouping, of which both nations are founding members.

One of the central themes of the visit will be the strengthening of economic ties, especially in the energy sector. With the ongoing energy crisis exacerbated by sanctions on Russia, India has emerged as one of the key buyers of Russian oil. The visit is expected to solidify agreements surrounding the energy trade, including the potential for India to increase its imports of Russian crude oil at discounted rates. This move is likely to provide India with a cost-effective energy source while helping Russia circumvent Western sanctions.

Discussions are expected to focus on further cooperation in defence, where Russia has long been a major supplier of military hardware to India. The two nations are expected to advance negotiations on new defence contracts, including the potential for joint production and technology sharing. The defence ties between Russia and India date back decades, and the visit will likely see the formalisation of further agreements that could further align their military interests.

The visit will also involve talks on expanding technological collaboration, particularly in the areas of space and nuclear energy. Both countries have made significant strides in these fields, and there is potential for further joint ventures, which could bring both economic and technological benefits to each nation. Putin’s presence in India is expected to reinforce Moscow’s commitment to its relationship with New Delhi, signalling Russia’s ongoing support for India’s strategic ambitions in the global arena.

Putin’s upcoming visit also comes at a time of heightened global tension. As the war in Ukraine continues to dominate headlines, Russia has increasingly sought to deepen ties with countries that have been less critical of its actions, including India. New Delhi has maintained a relatively neutral stance in the conflict, focusing instead on its national interests and calling for peace talks. This approach has allowed India to strengthen its ties with Russia without facing the same level of international scrutiny as some of the West.

The visit is likely to be significant for the future of BRICS, a bloc of emerging economies that includes Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa. The group has been exploring the possibility of expanding its membership, and Putin’s visit could serve as a platform for discussing further collaboration within this framework. As BRICS nations continue to challenge the traditional Western-dominated global order, Russia and India are likely to explore ways to enhance their collective influence in international forums.

While both nations have shared interests, their relationship has not been without challenges. India’s growing economic ties with the West, especially in the technology and trade sectors, have sometimes created friction in its ties with Russia. However, the long-standing nature of their partnership, especially in defence, has ensured that these tensions have remained manageable. Putin’s visit is expected to reinforce the idea that despite external pressures, Russia and India will continue to prioritise their strategic interests.

US President Donald Trump has announced plans to significantly raise tariffs on exports from India, citing the country’s oil purchases from Russia as the primary reason for the move. The statement marks an escalation in tensions between the two countries, with both sides having clashed over trade policies and geopolitical issues in recent years.

Trump’s remarks, made on social media, have ignited a strong response from New Delhi, which views the threat as unjustified and damaging to its economic interests. The US President criticized India’s ongoing imports of Russian crude oil, calling the move a betrayal, as the West intensifies efforts to isolate Moscow over its invasion of Ukraine. He pointed out that India’s purchases were then being resold on the international market for profits, further compounding the situation.

The US government has consistently condemned the sale of Russian oil to countries that are still buying from Moscow amid global sanctions designed to cripple the Russian economy. These sanctions, which were imposed by the US and its allies in response to Russia’s aggressive actions in Ukraine, have led to a complex diplomatic web, with several nations, including India, caught in the middle.

While the US and European Union have significantly reduced their oil imports from Russia, countries like India and China have stepped in to fill the gap, buying discounted crude oil from Moscow. India, in particular, has ramped up its purchases of Russian energy, a decision that is seen by many as a strategic move to secure energy resources at lower costs. These purchases have helped India maintain its economic growth amidst the energy price crisis exacerbated by the war in Ukraine.

The announcement by Trump that tariffs on Indian goods would be substantially raised could have serious repercussions for trade between the two nations. India is one of the United States’ largest trading partners, and any significant tariffs would undoubtedly affect a range of industries, from agriculture to technology. In 2022, the bilateral trade between the two countries surpassed $150 billion, with India exporting a wide array of goods to the US, including textiles, chemicals, and pharmaceuticals.

The Indian government, however, has rejected Trump’s claims, arguing that its oil purchases from Russia are in line with its energy security needs and do not violate any international laws. New Delhi has maintained a neutral stance on the war in Ukraine, calling for dialogue and diplomacy to resolve the crisis rather than escalating sanctions and pressure on Russia.

India’s position reflects a broader strategy of balancing its foreign relations with both the West and Russia. While it maintains strong ties with the US and Europe, it also values its long-standing relationship with Russia, particularly in defense and energy sectors. Over the years, Russia has been a reliable supplier of defense equipment to India, a factor that continues to shape India’s foreign policy decisions.

The economic impact of higher tariffs could have a ripple effect on both countries’ economies. India could face higher costs for its exports to the US, which might lead to inflationary pressures within certain sectors. For the US, such tariffs could result in higher prices for American consumers on imported goods, potentially exacerbating inflation at a time when the country is already grappling with economic challenges.

The political fallout from Trump’s threat to raise tariffs could further complicate efforts to resolve trade disputes between the US and India. Both nations have been working on strengthening their strategic and economic ties, but issues like tariffs and energy trade could undermine this progress. Negotiations over trade deals, such as the proposed free trade agreement, may now face significant hurdles as both sides dig in their heels.

The decision to increase tariffs on India could also have wider implications for the global economy. It might set a precedent for other nations to retaliate against countries purchasing Russian oil, particularly those in the Global South who have not been willing to fully sever their economic ties with Moscow. This could potentially fragment the global energy market even further, making it harder for countries to secure stable and affordable energy supplies.

This development highlights the growing division between the US-led West and countries that have opted to remain neutral or continue engaging with Russia. As the war in Ukraine shows no sign of abating, the economic and diplomatic repercussions of these decisions are likely to continue shaping global relations for the foreseeable future.

Swatch Group’s first‑half figures underscore a deepening crisis in its key Asian markets after the Swiss watch‑maker disclosed a 7.1 per cent drop in sales, generating CHF 3.059 billion, falling short of market forecasts of CHF 3.2 billion. Operating profit plunged 67 per cent year‑on‑year to CHF 68 million, signalling an urgent warning to investors and management alike.

China, alongside Hong Kong and Macau, remains the primary weak spot, contributing 27 per cent of total revenues. Falling demand across these regions continues to undermine core sales and profit performance. Despite encouraging double‑digit growth in North America and market share gains in countries such as Japan, India and the Middle East, these gains have yet to compensate for the shortfall from Greater China.

Net profit attributable to owners collapsed to CHF 3 million, compared with CHF 136 million during the same six‑month period last year. This dramatic decline illustrates the scale of the downturn, making it Swatch’s worst half‑year performance in recent memory.

Analyst commentary has been scathing: Vontobel described this period as “an ugly half year for Swatch Group in all respects”. The fallout from slowed Chinese consumer activity has been compounded by negative currency effects—Swiss franc appreciation cut CHF 113 million from turnover relative to constant‑currency comparisons.

Adding fresh complexity, new U. S. tariffs threaten to raise costs on Swiss watch imports by up to 31 per cent. Industry stakeholders now warn that these levies could further weigh on margins, with retailers like Watches of Switzerland projecting a margin squeeze in the year ahead.

Beyond external pressures, a growing number of investors are scrutinising Swatch’s internal governance. Shareholder activism has surfaced, with calls for more oversight of the centrally controlled Hayek family, whose dual‑class voting structure remains a source of contention. Net profits collapsed by 75 per cent to CHF 219 million in 2024, but critics assert that this malaise runs deeper. GreenWood Investors, led by Steven Wood, has launched a push to join the board, advocating for brand revitalisation, governance reforms and a strategy pivot toward luxury exclusivity akin to Hermès and Ferrari.

Management, though addressing short‑term volatility, emphasises Swatch’s entrenched strengths. Its vertically integrated manufacturing, with over 150 production sites, and the success of the affordable MoonSwatch line demonstrate resilience. The company has pledged that cost‑cutting measures and a pipeline of new product launches—particularly in the U. S. and Japan—should drive a rebound in the second half of the year.

The first‑half slump follows broader downturns last year, when revenue declined 12.2 per cent to CHF 6.74 billion in 2024, and operating profit fell 75 per cent to CHF 304 million. That drop reinforced trading floor rumours of governance fatigue and brand dilution at high‑end labels like Omega and Breguet.

Economically, China’s consumer landscape remains unsettled. A combination of property market stress, slower GDP growth and official campaigns discouraging conspicuous consumption have dampened luxury spending. Swiss watch exports to China and Hong Kong plunged by double digits in early 2024, while only the lower‑priced Swatch line bucked the trend in the region, gaining 10 per cent in sales volume.

Swatch Group’s corporate ambition to maintain full production capacity and avoid layoffs during weak demand, while strategically commendable, has weighed on margins—especially in the production segment. Management asserts this decision safeguards long‑term capabilities and is now beginning to bear fruit, with production margins improving since June.

Mixed signs beyond China offer guarded optimism. North America posted record sales, Japan recorded robust growth, and emerging markets like India and the Middle East offered upside. These regions now form the central axis of Swatch’s recovery strategy.

A joint alert from seven United Nations agencies has flagged Gaza’s fuel stocks as critically depleted, imperilling vital services for its 2.1 million residents. With fuel supplies down to a scarce trickle, health care, water, sanitation, aid distribution and communications infrastructures are faltering.

Hospitals such as Al‑Shifa in Gaza City have begun rationing fuel, placing patients in life-threatening situations. Doctors report incubators and dialysis equipment may fail within hours, while oxygen generators are sputtering. Ambulances have stalled, forcing staff to carry patients by hand, as critical care units teeter on collapse.

Water purification plants and sewage systems are shutting down without generator support, raising alarms over disease risks. UN officials have witnessed a sharp rise in meningitis and diarrhoeal illnesses among children. Bakeries and community kitchens have stopped, reducing the availability of fresh bread—a major food source for the displaced.

Although a one‑time delivery of some 75,000 litres reached Gaza—marking the first fuel entry in roughly four months—UN agencies caution this is but a drop in a deepening crisis. The quantity represents only a small fraction of the daily requirement to sustain relief operations. Officials emphasise that without regular, scaled deliveries, essential services face imminent blanket failure.

Israeli authorities have maintained that fuel shipments may be misused by militant groups, a claim that relief agencies strongly dispute. UN humanitarian representatives assert that fuel restrictions effectively constitute a form of collective punishment, with civilians bearing the brunt.

The blockade has persisted alongside ongoing military operations since March, despite intermittent commitments to allow aid in. The latest minimal fuel delivery was reportedly the first in 130 days. UN Secretary‑General António Guterres warned that without fuel to power ambulances, incubators and water networks, the fabric of civilian life is unraveling.

Aid workers are racing to implement rationing measures, diverting remaining stocks toward the most critical services—hospitals, maternity wards, water treatment facilities and mobile communications. But this partial reprieve is insufficient to meet surging demand.

In Gaza and beyond, humanitarian experts are urging urgent diplomatic engagement. Negotiations for new fuel corridors and scaled deliveries via Egypt and other Gaza crossings are underway, though the process remains slow and subject to volatile approval protocols. Some international mediators argue that allowing fuel in is as vital as increasing food aid, citing the interdependency of humanitarian systems.

The crisis has sparked global concern. UN agencies emphasise that fuel is the “backbone of survival”—not just for hospitals but for sanitation, communications, bakeries and logistics networks that sustain entire communities.

As operations continue under strain, the spotlight falls on the window of opportunity for diplomatic resolution. Pressure is mounting on all parties involved to remove barriers inhibiting consistent fuel access, which UN officials say is non‑negotiable to prevent the collapse of civilian life in Gaza.

Air Arabia has recommenced double daily non‑stop flights between Sharjah and Damascus from 10 July 2025, marking a pivotal renewal of air connectivity between the UAE and Syria. The low‑cost carrier’s decision, following a suspension since 2012, responds to rising demand and broader regional diplomatic easing.

The carrier’s reinstated schedule includes two early departures from Sharjah at 04:15 and 10:45, landing in Damascus at 06:30 and 13:00, respectively. Return services depart Damascus at 07:30 and 14:00, arriving in Sharjah at approximately 11:40 and 18:10 local time. Utilising Airbus A320s and A321s, Air Arabia’s fleet will provide in‑flight entertainment via ‘SkyTime’, on‑board dining through ‘SkyCafe’, and loyalty benefits under its ‘Air Rewards’ programme.

During a launch ceremony at Sharjah International Airport, attendees included Adel Al Ali, Group CEO of Air Arabia, and Ali Salim Al Midfa, Chairman of Sharjah Airport Authority, indicating the route’s strategic significance. A reception at Damascus International Airport featured UAE Ambassador Hasan Ahmed Mohammed Sulaiman Alshehhi and Syria’s Chargé d’Affaires Ziad Yahya Zaher Edin.

CEO Al Ali emphasised the route’s importance in serving the substantial Syrian diaspora in the UAE, estimated at over 350,000 individuals, and facilitating enhanced travel for business, tourism, and family visits. He remarked, “This route holds particular significance in serving the Syrian diaspora in the region and meeting the growing travel demand between the UAE and Syria.” The airline anticipates this service will bolster trade ties, with bilateral trade having reached US $680 million in 2024—a 23 percent increase over 2023.

Air Arabia’s restoring of direct flights aligns with a wider trend of regional airlines re‑engaging Syria. Emirates is scheduled to recommence services to Damascus from 16 July, expanding to daily flights by October. Flydubai resumed operations on 26 June. Additionally, national carrier Syrian Air has restarted several regional services since January, while Qatar Airways reinstated a Doha‑Damascus route in early January. Turkish budget airline Anadolu Jet launched flights from Istanbul and Ankara in April.

Damascus International Airport itself underwent closure during an opposition offensive in December 2024, later reopening with limited commercial flights. Full international traffic resumed in January 2025, with renovation support from Turkey in February.

The renewal of these services carries deeper geopolitical significance, reflecting a subtle shift in diplomatic engagement with Syria. In April, the UAE’s General Civil Aviation Authority formally lifted suspensions on flights to Syria, and UAE‑Syrian ministerial talks have since addressed aviation, banking, and consular matters.

Travel agents and industry analysts have interpreted the move as a calculated expansion of Air Arabia’s network, offering cost‑conscious alternatives to Gulf‑Europe‑Syria itineraries, especially for the UK and Europe‑based Syrian diaspora. The airline’s fare structure and twice‑daily service are expected to attract both long‑standing diaspora links and emerging trade flows.

Independent aviation analysts note that Air Arabia’s streamlined operations, lean cost base, and digital platform—covering bookings via website, app, call centre, and travel agencies—are key competitive advantages. The company now serves more than 90 global destinations, including recent additions such as Sochi, Prague, and expansion within Russia and Europe.

Despite the optimism, security concerns remain. Damascus Airport was only partially reopened in January, and while the civil aviation authority has announced upgrades, full operational stability depends on infrastructure restoration and geopolitical calm. Some observers caution that air travel to Syria may still face intermittent regulatory or safety challenges, advising prospective travellers to monitor advisories and airlines’ updates closely.

Nevertheless, the resumption of the Sharjah–Damascus route represents a turning point for mobility in the region. By restoring a decade‑long link, Air Arabia reinforces its position as a catalyst for regional integration and economic exchange, while filling a transport gap for displaced communities and traders across the Gulf.