News related to
President

Ajman has emerged as the host for the 58th Asian Fitness and Bodybuilding Championship, taking place from 15 to 17 June 2025 at the Emirates Hospitality Centre. The emirate, hosting the event for the first time, extends a formal welcome under the patronage of His Highness Sheikh Ammar bin Humaid Al Nuaimi, Crown Prince of Ajman and Chairman of the Executive Council, with the presence of Sheikh Abdulaziz bin Humaid Al Nuaimi, Chairman of the Ajman Department of Tourism Development.

Delegations from 23 nations across Asia will converge on Ajman this week, marking a notable heightening of the emirate’s stature within international sports circles. The Asian Bodybuilding and Fitness Federation’s congress also convened on 14 June, assembling leading officials and athletes to chart governance, standards and growth pathways for the sport across the continent.

IFBB President Dr Rafael Santonja expressed strong approval of Ajman’s preparations. He praised the local authorities’ logistical efforts and voiced confidence that the event will proceed in “the best possible manner,” reflecting meticulous planning.

By integrating top-tier competition with a high-level governance forum, Ajman seeks to project itself as a dynamic arena for Asia’s sporting peaks. The congress set the stage for the championships, drawing attention to the need for continuity between seasonally organised regional fests and global-level federation oversight.

Competitors span multiple divisions, including bodybuilding by height, men’s and women’s physique, fitness challenge categories, and adaptive contests such as wheelchair bodybuilding and para-bodybuilding. The comprehensive format reflects the IFBB’s commitment to expanding inclusivity, with winners across senior classes earning IFBB Pro Cards, enhancing the stakes for participants.

Logistics have been arranged to accommodate the influx of athletes, officials and support staff. Delegations arrived on 14 June, as confirmed by weigh-ins and registration hosted at the Bahi Ajman Palace Hotel. The adjacent Asian Federation congress was conducted at Ajman Saray Hotel. Recommended airports include Sharjah and Dubai, easing international access to the host emirate.

Entry structures show stringent anti-doping controls, with compliance to WADA standards in place. National federations have a stringent responsibility to vet athletes, especially those with past doping violations. Consent to drug testing was mandatory upon registration.

Registration fees include accommodation and meals from 14 to 18 June, with athletes opting for single or shared rooms at Bahi Ajman Palace Hotel. Crossover category participants incur a USD 100 surcharge.

The championship schedule unfolds across three days, with prejudging commencing on Day 2. Finals continue through Day 3 and Day 4 before closing events conclude on 17 June. Delegations depart on 18 June. This compact time-frame underscores an intention to deliver a high-impact, tightly controlled competition.

Ajman’s hosting aligns with a broader push to diversify its economy through sporting tourism and cultural diplomacy. The tourism authority unveiled the event’s logo and mascot—‘Mayed’—alongside traditional Emirati performances, highlighting the interplay between sporting and cultural platforms. The championship is expected to catalyse increased occupancy in the hospitality sector and heightened international visibility.

Preparatory logistics—hotel accommodations, venue readiness, anti-doping protocols, and athlete transport—underscore Ajman’s growing capacity to stage large-scale events. Federal backing ensures alignment with Wahid leadership’s vision to see the emirate emerge as a regional hub for international gatherings across sports, business, and tourism.

The intersection of high-performance sport, organisational governance and cultural presentation at Ajman’s inaugural hosting of the Asian Fitness and Bodybuilding Championship signals the emirate’s aspiration to position itself prominently on Asia’s event map.

U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission chair Paul Atkins has formally withdrawn several cryptocurrency-focused rule proposals initiated under former chair Gary Gensler, representing a decisive shift in regulatory strategy.

At the centre of the SEC’s action are two major proposals: amendments to Exchange Act Rule 3b‑16, which sought to classify decentralized finance protocols as securities exchanges, and the implementation of enhanced custody requirements under the Investment Advisers Act for client crypto assets. The withdrawal, confirmed on 13 June 2025, reflects a broader deregulatory drive under the current administration.

Rule 3b‑16 had been poised to expand the SEC’s definition of “exchange” to include systems bringing together buyers and sellers of securities via smart contracts and other DeFi mechanisms. The proposal would have subjected many decentralised platforms to full regulatory oversight, unsettling industry participants and drawing criticism from blockchain developers and legal experts. Many in the crypto sector argued the move would permanently conflate DeFi infrastructure with traditional securities exchanges, hampering innovation.

The custody rule aimed to require investment advisers to deposit all client crypto assets with “qualified custodians” such as banks or registered broker‑dealers. That would have effectively sidelined many crypto-native custodians that don’t meet these standards. Proponents cited the need for robust safeguards, while opponents warned the rule would force clients into a narrow pool of custodians and increase costs.

The SEC’s withdrawal announcement emphasised that it will not pursue finalisation of these proposals and may “consider new rulemaking in the future.” The reversals are part of a broader retreat from Gensler-era initiatives, including planned ESG reporting mandates and cybersecurity obligations. Acting chair Mark Uyeda had suspended both the DeFi exchange and custody rules in March, and this withdrawal gives that decision official effect.

Market reaction was swift. Coinbase’s chief legal officer, Paul Grewal, declared on X that the agency had scrapped “3b16, qualified custodian, and all other unfinished Gensler rule proposals.” Crypto platforms welcomed the rollback, viewing it as a reaffirmation of self‑custody and decentralised financial innovation.

Institutional stakeholders also voiced support. Brian Laverdure, Senior VP of Digital Assets and Innovation Policy at ICBA, noted the agency’s publication had “withdraws several NPRMs” including definition of “exchange” changes and safeguarding rules, sending confidence ripples through community banks and investment advisers.

The shift in posture follows President Donald Trump’s commitment to reducing regulatory burdens on markets. In tandem, SEC staff and FINRA dismantled a long-standing 2019 joint statement on broker‑dealer custody of digital asset securities on 15 May, paving the way for regulated intermediaries to offer crypto custody services under established rules.

The SEC’s deregulatory drive is echoed in recent comments from Uyeda, who in March announced the agency might scrap or significantly amend crypto custody rules introduced during the previous administration. He emphasised a pivot towards “effective and cost‑efficient regulations that respect the limits of our statutory authority”.

Critics caution that this pivot could expose clients to risks. While standards for DeFi governance, custodial integrity, and cybersecurity remain under voluntary frameworks, there are concerns that stripping formal oversight could open institutional and retail investors to vulnerabilities. Legal analysts predict renewed debate over the SEC’s authority to classify new financial structures as securities.

DeFi proponents, for their part, argue the withdrawal presents an opportunity. With regulatory certainty withdrawn, startups and developers may double down on innovation, integrating hybrid compliance models that rely on decentralised autonomy rather than central oversight. Meanwhile, traditional custodians and broker‑dealers are expected to enter the crypto space more aggressively, now freed from the obligation of specialist “qualified custodian” status.

Remaining questions include whether Congress will move to impose legislative frameworks on digital assets and whether the SEC will pursue fresh proposals under a different legal theory. Commissioner Hester Peirce has signalled support for further dialogue and interpretative guidance, reinforcing a more incremental, consultative regulatory model.

The SEC is now scheduled to hold stakeholder forums and public consultations in the coming months. Industry watchers are closely tracking these developments to assess whether the rollback represents a long-term deregulatory reorientation or a temporary reprieve preceding fresh oversight efforts.

Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth informed the Senate Appropriations Committee on 11 June 2025 that the United States and Qatar have not yet formalised any agreement transferring a Boeing 747‑8 jetliner gifted by the Qatari royal family for potential use as Air Force One. Lawmakers pressing for details were met with repeated deferrals, as Hegseth invoked security and confidentiality concerns.

Senators voiced concern over the lack of transparency surrounding the gift. Senator Jack Reed of Rhode Island demanded insight into contractual terms and timeframe for retrofitting the aircraft to meet presidential standards, only to be told such information was “not for public consumption”. The Pentagon has neither disclosed cost estimates nor identified a specific US contractor for the extensive upgrade work required, including secure communications, defensive capabilities and airworthiness certification.

Despite earlier assurances from Air Force Secretary Troy Meink that retrofitting expenses could remain under USD 400 million, Democrats remain sceptical. Senator Chris Murphy pointed out that past Air Force One modernisation efforts have encountered significant budget escalations, sometimes reaching billions, and questioned the wisdom of funding work on a foreign jet when replacement aircraft are already in production.

Republicans, including Senators Jim Risch and Roger Marshall, defended the deal, asserting that Qatar and the UAE are strong US allies and that the jet donation alleviates procurement delays with Boeing. Secretary Hegseth echoed this view, suggesting that accepting Qatar’s jet could temporarily ease reliance on delayed Boeing‑built VC‑25B aircraft, though he declined to specify projected completion dates or key benchmarks.

Ethical concerns persist across party lines. Opponents argue that accepting a luxury aircraft from a foreign government may trigger Foreign Emoluments Clause issues or at least generate the appearance of impropriety. Qatar, meanwhile, has maintained that the nature of the transaction is under review—possibly a lease or outright purchase rather than a gift—though final details remain unresolved.

The Boeing 747‑8 in question, approximately 13 years old, features lavish interiors and advanced technology, earning it the nickname “palace in the sky.” Converting it to a presidential transport requires secure communications suites, defensive countermeasures, and structural modifications—a process estimated to span years. While Pentagon officials suggest costs may be contained beneath USD 400 million, analysts warn that upgrades for classified systems and nuclear safety could push costs well above one billion dollars.

Beyond the technical and ethical dimensions, questions remain over how accepting Qatar’s jet might affect broader US defence priorities. Some argue that prioritising resources for a foreign-made interim aircraft could detract from funding the delayed VC‑25B programme, which is pivotal to modernising the presidential fleet.

At the same hearing, Hegseth also dismissed calls for transparency, stating that budgetary and negotiating processes must remain classified for national security. This response intensified criticism from Democratic senators, who claim taxpayers deserve clarity on military expenditures and foreign transfers of high-value assets.

Meanwhile, Senate Republicans rejected two resolutions aiming to pause arms sales to Qatar and the UAE, signalling ongoing bipartisan support for the Gulf states despite growing unease over Trump administration’s foreign dealings. Republicans emphasised the strategic importance of maintaining strong defence cooperation, downplaying concerns over the aircraft gift.

The debate is set to continue as the Air Force advances planning and preliminary feasibility studies. Key upcoming moments include formalisation of the memorandum of understanding, selection of retrofit contractors, and disclosure of cost and timeline projections. The outcome will test the administration’s balance between diplomatic expediency, financial responsibility, and institutional transparency.

Kyiv’s parliament has introduced draft Bill 13356, empowering the National Bank of Ukraine to incorporate virtual assets—primarily Bitcoin—into its official gold and foreign-exchange reserves. The legislation would not compel the central bank to adopt such assets, but merely grant it the legal framework to do so.

Lead author Yaroslav Zheleznyak, first deputy chair of the Rada’s Finance Committee, highlighted that the bank would retain full discretion over timing, volume, and methodology of any crypto acquisitions. He described the measure as a pivotal move to “integrate Ukraine into global financial innovations” and bolster macroeconomic resilience while catalysing the digital economy.

Ukraine currently holds approximately 46,351 BTC—valued at over $5 billion—though these holdings originate from asset seizures, donations, and fundraising during wartime, and remain under civil-servant control rather than central-bank custody. If passed, the law would permit the bank to transition some of those coins into officially recognised reserves.

The proposal mirrors a broader trend: several nations are charting similar initiatives. The United States launched a Strategic Bitcoin Reserve under an executive order issued on 6 March by former President Trump, consolidating government‑owned cryptos into a national asset. Pakistan, Brazil and the Czech Republic are exploring mechanisms to incorporate digital assets into sovereign financial systems. El Salvador, which adopted Bitcoin as legal tender in 2021, holds over 6,000 BTC, while Bhutan maintains mining‑powered reserves worth around $750 million.

Yet the move is not without detractors. Critics emphasise Bitcoin’s volatility, liquidity constraints and concentration within corporate entities like MicroStrategy, which undermine its suitability as a stable reserve asset. The Swiss National Bank’s governor, Martin Schlegel, reaffirmed this stance on 25 April in Bern, warning that crypto lacks the stability and liquidity required for central‑bank reserve portfolios. ECB President Christine Lagarde has echoed similar concerns, stating that digital assets do not meet the criteria for eurozone reserve holdings.

Proponents argue that strategic inclusion could buffer Ukraine against inflation and currency devaluation, offering rapid, secure transferability unmatched by physical assets. Zheleznyak’s Telegram statement emphasised that implementation would be fully at the central bank’s professional discretion.

Operationalising the proposal will require establishing robust legal and procedural frameworks: anti‑money‑laundering protocols, cybersecurity safeguards, digital custody infrastructure, and accounting mechanisms. Banking analysts suggest that careful integration and risk management will be essential to balance innovation with financial stability.

Ukraine’s draft arrives amid growing global debate on digital money. Central bank digital currencies are being piloted worldwide, such as Turkey’s digital lira, China’s e‑renminbi, and Nigeria’s e‑Naira. Meanwhile, debates continue over whether public‑sector balance sheets should venture into decentralised finance or maintain traditional gold‑forex portfolios.

As parliamentarians prepare to debate Bill 13356, attention will turn to amendments that might specify asset types, risk parameters, and accounting standards—or narrow discretionary power for the central bank. The legislation must also align with IMF frameworks and comply with anti‑money‑laundering regulations.

Trump Media & Technology Group, owner of the Truth Social platform, has submitted a Form S‑1 registration to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission for its proposed Truth Social Bitcoin ETF, aiming to list on NYSE Arca. The application states the fund will hold Bitcoin directly, with Crypto.com serving as custodian, prime execution agent and liquidity provider, and Yorkville America Digital listed as sponsor. NYSE Arca has separately filed a Form 19b‑4 to list the fund should it receive regulatory approval.

The filing highlights an unprecedented disclosure linking the fund’s prospects to President Trump’s crypto-related initiatives. For the first time in a crypto-ETF filing, the risk section cites creation of an SEC crypto task force in January and the March executive order establishing a Strategic Bitcoin Reserve. It warns that the impact of these policies on the sponsor, the fund, TMTG, Crypto.com or affiliates “is not possible to fully predict”. Bloomberg’s Eric Balchunas noted this is likely “the first time ever the advisor is in the risk section”.

If approved, the ETF would become part of a growing cohort of spot Bitcoin funds currently active in the U.S., including BlackRock’s iShares Bitcoin Trust, which has amassed over US $70 billion in assets, BlackRock having initially launched the product in January 2024. Other major asset managers—Fidelity, Bitwise—also offer similar instruments, making the market highly competitive.

TMTG’s proposed fund is closely tied to the broader ambitions of Trump’s crypto policy platform. The earlier executive order in March 2025 mandated creation of a Strategic Bitcoin Reserve using government-forfeited assets, effectively integrating Bitcoin into sovereign reserves. The order also created a U.S. Digital Asset Stockpile, requiring federal agencies to centralise digital asset holdings and obliging the Secretaries of Treasury and Commerce to evaluate further acquisitions at no cost to taxpayers.

The regulatory backdrop has shifted markedly. January’s executive directive established a Presidential Working Group on Digital Asset Markets and directed the SEC to create a crypto task force. Gary Gensler resigned as SEC chair on the eve of Trump’s inauguration and was succeeded by Paul Atkins, a noted crypto advocate. The SEC has since dropped several previous enforcement cases and eased accounting rules, paving the way for more crypto-product filings.

Trump Media’s broader strategy involves securing a substantial Bitcoin treasury. SEC filings indicate its Form S‑3 shelf registration allows issuance of up to 85 million shares tied to its $2.3 billion private placement, earmarked to purchase roughly 23,000 Bitcoin—potentially placing the company among the top public corporate holders. Custody of these assets is expected to be shared between Anchorage Digital and Crypto.com.

Yorkville America Digital’s dual role—as sponsor of the ETF and partner to TMTG—has raised questions of conflicts of interest. The risk disclosure notes Yorkville affiliates are also involved in Truth.Fi, an investing platform tied to Trump’s “America First” agenda, and have made up to $2.5 billion in equity commitments to TMTG. The same affiliate acted as co-placement agent for the $2.44 billion private placement.

Financial markets have responded with mixed signals. While Bitcoin briefly surpassed US $111,000 following Trump’s return to the executive and policy shifts, it has since retreated to the US $105,000–$101,000 range. TMTG’s own stock dropped around 8 per cent following public disputes between Trump and Elon Musk, and remains down roughly 56 per cent over the past 12 months.

Analysts say the fund faces significant challenges. Despite its high-profile branding and alignment with Trump’s policy agenda, it competes against established firms with deep institutional credibility. ETF expert Dave Nadig remarked that long-term asset gathering for this fund is “extraordinarily unlikely”. CoinCorner CEO Danny Scott expressed unease about Trump’s use of political influence in personal financial ventures.

The ETF’s structure also contains potentially problematic clauses. Cointelegraph reports that the S‑1 includes exclusive arrangements granting Crypto.com sole custodian and liquidity provision roles, and provisions that allow the sponsor to take positions ahead of the Trust—raising transparency concerns.

Still, proponents contend the fund could redefine retail and ideological investor access. Backers assert its America‑First branding might appeal to conservative retail investors seeking regulated Bitcoin exposure. Crypto.com’s reach—serving over 140 million users and holding approximately US $30 billion in assets—could alleviate institutional concerns about custody risk.

Approval hinges on SEC review of both S‑1 and 19b‑4 filings. With multiple spot Bitcoin ETFs already approved in the U.S., the regulatory framework exists—but TMTG’s political ties, interlocking financial relationships and novel disclosures may trigger heightened scrutiny.

Donald Trump has declared on social media that the United States and China have finalised a trade agreement, pending formal sign-off from both himself and Chinese President Xi Jinping. The accord ensures China will supply rare earth minerals and magnets “up front” to the U.S., while the U.S. will honour its commitments, including allowing Chinese students to study at American universities. Trump also highlighted a tariff arrangement favouring the U.S., imposing a total of 55 per cent, against China’s 10 per cent.

Negotiators in London laid the groundwork for this framework during two days of discussions aimed at restoring the Geneva truce first reached in May, which had faltered amid export restrictions on critical minerals. U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick described the outcome as putting “meat on the bones” of the Geneva agreement by addressing China’s curbs on rare earths and magnets. Both governments intend to present the framework for approval by Trump and Xi.

China controls a significant share of the world’s rare earth minerals, essential for manufacturing electronics, electric vehicles and defence technologies. Export licences recently granted to Chinese firms meeting U.S. demand reinforce China’s commitment to the agreement. The shortage of these minerals had previously disrupted global supply chains and limited U.S. access to critical components.

Alongside rare earth supplies, the agreement addresses educational exchanges by reaffirming that Chinese students will continue to access American universities. Trump emphasised this pledge in his social media announcement. Although the U.S. has criticised visas for students in sensitive fields, the deal appears to restore earlier norms.

Trump presented the tariff structure as a win for American interests: 55 per cent U.S. tariffs versus 10 per cent Chinese tariffs. These adjustments mark a shift from the extreme tariff stances of earlier this year, which had peaked at triple-digit levels.

Stock markets responded cautiously to the news: global indices displayed measured optimism as investors awaited details and official approvals. Analysts warned that markets remain fragile, with movement dependent on implementation and trust between the two nations.

Beijing’s participation was led by Vice Premier He Lifeng and Commerce Minister Wang Wentao, who conveyed the deal as a balanced step toward reviving the Geneva pact. The U.S. delegation included Commerce Secretary Lutnick, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, and Trade Representative Jamieson Greer. President Trump and President Xi had previously spoken by telephone on 5 June, building momentum for these discussions.

Despite this progress, experts caution that deep-seated mistrust and unresolved disputes remain. Non‑tariff barriers, such as technology export restrictions and visa policies, continue to loom. Chinese officials emphasised the deal’s provisional nature, awaiting “balanced” steps by both sides.

Analyst Ian Bremmer of Eurasia Group observed that while restarting the Geneva truce is a step up from breakdown, achieving a durable U.S.-China trade relationship will require sustained engagement and policy alignment. The role of rare earths as leverage underscores China’s global strategic advantage.

President Trump signalled confidence that approval could occur swiftly: Lutnick suggested sign-off might happen within days, as early as Wednesday or Thursday, after which implementation could begin. However, both governments have set a firm deadline of 10 August to negotiate a broader accord, before tariffs revert to higher levels.

With economic growth at risk from disrupted supply chains and tense trade anomalies, both the White House and Beijing face pressure to deliver tangible results. The World Bank recently warned that heightened tariff uncertainty could drag down global growth to an estimated 2.3 per cent in 2025.

While the deal hasn’t resolved core security‑driven trade issues—such as semiconductor and aviation export controls—it marks a notable thaw in tensions. Trump labelled his relationship with Xi as “excellent”, while both leaders exchanged invitations for state visits, signalling a diplomatic openness that has been absent from U.S.-China relations.

The UAE Ministry of Finance convened an impactful awareness session in Shanghai for Emirati students pursuing studies in China, spotlighting pathways into international financial institutions and multilateral development bodies. The event, held at the Shanghai headquarters of the New Development Bank, marked a central component of the UAE’s “UAE Global Cadres” initiative aimed at preparing nationals for careers in global finance.

Attended by prominent figures including H.E. Muhannad Sulaiman Al Naqbi, Consul General in Shanghai; Thuraiya Hamid Alhashmi, Director of International Financial Relations; and Qiangwu Zhou, Vice‑President and CAO of the NDB, the session featured detailed presentations on recruitment, training mechanisms, and institutional roles in multilateral settings. Ali Abdullah Sharafi, Acting Assistant Undersecretary for International Financial Relations, highlighted the Ministry’s commitment to “creating an interactive environment that brings together young Emirati talent with influential international organisations”.

With a focus on introducing students to specific roles within institutions such as the New Development Bank, the discussion covered NDB’s core mission of financing infrastructure and sustainable development projects across member countries. Students were provided an in-depth look at the Bank’s internal functions, including strategic planning, project financing, and administrative operations—areas in which career prospects are steadily rising. Qiangwu Zhou shed light on NDB’s expansion and strengthening of its global talent pipeline, reinforcing the UAE’s active role in its leadership and operations.

The session formed part of a wider programme under the “UAE Global Cadres” framework, which seeks to empower Emirati youth with the knowledge and contacts necessary for onboarding into premier international financial institutions. The initiative offers customised introductions, tailored knowledge development, and structured partnerships with organisations like the NDB alongside other global bodies.

Ahli Emirati scholars heard how the Ministry actively forges linkages with multilateral entities, not only to open doors for internships and secondments but also to embed nationals within strategic policy and operational roles. Students were briefed on specific entry requirements, including academic credentials, language proficiency, internship prerequisites, and application timelines. The Ministry emphasised its role as a facilitator, guiding candidates from initial interest through to successful placement.

The Shanghai session aligns with similar outreach efforts previously held in London and Washington, forging a consistent global strategy. In London, Home Office-led seminars engaged Emiratis studying in the UK, while in Washington, the Ministry together with representatives from the World Bank and IMF provided insights into recruitment and professional development frameworks.

Officials confirmed that up to 100 Emirati students participated in the Shanghai event. These attendees represent a cross-section of postgraduate candidates in disciplines such as economics, finance, development studies, and public policy. The Ministry has underlined its ambition for the programme to scale further, expanding to additional locations and engaging larger cohorts.

By nurturing talent domestically and internationally, the UAE aims to enhance its representation within global financial institutions and multilateral banks. This strategy dovetails with broader national goals: positioning Emiratis as influential actors on the world stage and ensuring the nation’s contribution to international finance is both substantive and sustainable.

Strategic partnerships with institutions like the NDB are vital in this respect. Established by BRICS nations in 2014, the NDB is undergoing rapid growth, investing in global operations while seeking multilingual professionals with cross-cultural acumen. For UAE nationals, the Bank offers a rare opportunity to join a rising multilateral institution from an early stage in its trajectory. According to NDB’s Vice-President Zhou, Emirati contributions at organisational and governance levels are steadily increasing.

Students raised questions about the logistics of recruitment, including timelines, evaluation methodologies, and integration approaches. Officials emphasised the importance of early engagement, noting that securing internships during or immediately after academic studies is critical. They also recommended building competencies in project management, negotiation, and multicultural teamwork. Ministry representatives expressed that the goal extends well beyond securing roles—it is about training a generation of Emiratis capable of navigating and shaping global finance policies.

The session also included interactive elements such as Q&A panels and breakout discussions, enabling direct engagement with senior practitioners from the NDB and the Ministry. This format allowed participants to seek personalised advice on career planning, CV refinement, and interview techniques.

The broader economic context for this effort is clear: as global development finance pivots towards sustainable and inclusive projects, multilateral institutions are broadening their hiring strategies to include more diverse nationalities. Countries like the UAE are responding by investing in preparatory programmes that align local talent pipelines with evolving international demand.

This engagement echoes the Ministry’s participation in high-level forums; last August, UAE delegates attended the ninth Annual Meeting of the NDB Board of Governors in Cape Town. Thuraiya Hamid Alhashmi represented the nation on the Board alongside representatives from Egypt and Bangladesh, underscoring the UAE’s growing strategic engagement with the Bank.

Officials described the Shanghai session as “a landmark opportunity for Emirati students to learn first-hand about global finance careers” and signposted further events planned in Europe and North America. The Ministry stressed that participation is not limited to finance graduates—disciplines including law, environmental policy, and engineering are also relevant to multilateral institution operations.

The new wave of global finance, driven by sustainability goals and digital transformation, requires professionals with a hybrid skill set: technical competence, policy insight, cultural intelligence, and legal understanding. The Ministry’s programme aims to sculpt Emirati candidates who meet these multifaceted demands, thereby positioning them as competitive contenders in the international talent ecosystem.