News related to
research

GCC countries secured $3.4 bn from 24 initial public offerings in the first half of 2025, down 6% from $3.6 bn over 23 listings a year earlier, according to a report by Kuwaiti research firm Markaz. Saudi Arabia drove the surge, contributing $2.8 bn through 22 IPOs—an increase of 36% year‑on‑year—while the UAE and Oman saw more subdued performances.

Oil‑price volatility, US tariff threats and global trade uncertainty weighed on market sentiment, but issuance volumes rose. The number of offerings edged higher to 24 from 23 in H1 2024, illustrating issuer appetite amid wider economic headwinds.

Saudi listings captured 85% of the total proceeds, reinforcing its dominance in the regional IPO pipeline. The Kingdom raised $2.8 bn, up from $2.1 bn in the first half of 2024, with 22 issuances compared to 19 a year ago.

The UAE saw a substantial 88% drop in IPO proceeds, with just one public offering—Alpha Data—raising $163 m in Abu Dhabi. Oman followed with the debut of Asyad Shipping Company, generating $333 m on the Muscat bourse. No IPOs were recorded in Kuwait, Qatar or Bahrain during this period.

Sector analysis reveals the industrials segment led with $1.4 bn in proceeds, bolstered by Flynas and Asyad Shipping Company. Real estate followed with demand for development and construction offerings, while healthcare IPOs collected $505 m. Financial services and technology contributed $408 m and $204 m respectively.

Performance after listing was mixed. Ten of the 24 companies saw positive returns by the end of June. Asyad Shipping led the pack, with its stock surging 835% since its March 12 listing. Umm Al Qura in Saudi Arabia recorded a 51% gain. On the downside, Hedab Alkhaleej, Dkhoun National Trading and Service Equipment fell by 30%, 27% and 26% respectively. Flynas edged slightly lower by 0.2%, despite an initial dip.

Wider equity market performance across the region showed divergence. Kuwait’s bourse rose 18.1% year‑to‑date, followed by Dubai, Abu Dhabi and Qatar, while Oman, Bahrain and Saudi Arabia retreated by 1.7%, 2.1% and 7.6% respectively.

Geopolitical shocks—including renewed US tariff threats and oil price fluctuations— exerted pressure on national indices. On Monday, Saudi Arabia’s Tadawul shed 0.2%, while Dubai, Abu Dhabi and Qatar all fell in the range of 0.3–0.5%. Investors are watching US inflation signals and Fed decisions closely, given the peg of Gulf currencies to the dollar.

Despite softer proceeds overall, the strong issuance tally suggests issuers seized a narrow window before heightened uncertainty. A PwC analysis of Q1 showed GCC IPOs rose 33%, raising $1.6 bn from 11 deals, with Saudi Arabia capturing nearly 70% of that total.

Looking ahead, Saudi Arabia is expected to maintain momentum, driven by privatisation efforts and a diverse pipeline of government-linked listings led by the Public Investment Fund. The UAE is projected to ramp up activity in industrials and tech, while Kuwait is implementing regulatory reforms to stimulate listings.

Market analysts caution that global headwinds remain. PwC flagged how tariff announcements and macroeconomic instability continue to disrupt IPO sentiment globally. Within the GCC, sustained oil-price volatility and tightening monetary conditions add complexity.

Nevertheless, Gulf capital markets have demonstrated resilience. Encouraged by diversified sector participation and healthy post-listing gains, policymakers and market participants appear poised to capitalise on remaining windows of stability.

Oil prices have shifted sharply this week, with demand forecasts now under pressure from escalating trade tensions fuelled by fresh tariffs. Brent crude is trading in the high‑60s per barrel, while benchmark WTI hovers around mid‑60s, reflecting growing investor caution. Analysts point to revised supply and demand projections as indicators of a changing market landscape.

An International Energy Agency monthly report has cut its global oil‑demand growth forecast for 2025 to 700,000 bpd, the slowest pace since 2009 outside the pandemic, down from 720,000 bpd last month. The downgrade reflects weaker consumption in emerging markets and a cooling US‑China trade outlook. Supply continues to outpace demand as OPEC+ ramps up production; global output in June rose by about 950,000 bpd to reach 105.6 mbpd.

The IEA notes the oil market remains technically in surplus, with inventories building globally—even as regional stock draws persist. Oil runs at refineries have slowed, particularly in the US and China, enabling downward revisions in demand projections. Enverus Intelligence Research offers a counter‑view, pointing to balanced OECD inventories and sustained summer demand north of 1 mbpd, which may support higher prices.

The US Energy Information Administration expects US crude oil production to plateau at roughly 13.4 mbpd in 2025, dropping modestly later this year as lower prices curb drilling activity. Despite this, producers remain vulnerable to profit erosion unless prices stabilise in the $65–70 range.

President Trump’s trade moves have reignited fears of another global trade war, with new tariff letters dispatched to Brazil, South Korea, Japan, the Philippines and others this week. Threats of 50% duties on exports such as copper, semiconductor components and auto parts are weighing heavily on commodity‑linked equity markets and raising recession risk concerns. Oil prices dropped more than 2% on Thursday as benchmark futures responded to the potential hit to economic growth.

While some market participants remain in “wait‑and‑see” mode, given Trump’s unpredictability and history of policy reversals, the overarching effect is to dampen demand forecasts. Onyx Capital’s head of research, Harry Tchilinguirian, cautions against overreaction but acknowledges that tariffs are adding to inflationary pressures and may reinforce Federal Reserve caution.

Geopolitical flashpoints in the Middle East continue to influence sentiment. Oil surged in June as Iran threatened to close the Strait of Hormuz, which handles almost 20% of world oil shipments, but prices eased once the waterway remained open. Meanwhile, Saudi Arabia raised official prices to consumers, citing strong demand in China’s post‑pandemic recovery, though refiners are reporting margin squeezes.

Financial institutions have started to reflect this shifting environment in their projections. A Reuters‑polled group of 40 analysts revised Brent average forecasts for 2025 to $67.86 per barrel—up marginally from May—while predicting demand growth of only around 730,000 bpd. JP Morgan cut its annual Brent estimate to $66, citing rising OPEC+ output and sluggish consumption. TD Economics trimmed its forecast further, expecting 2025 WTI to average near $62, warning of sustained downward pressure from trade risk and oversupply.

Two factors loom large over the coming months. First, the path of trade tensions: further tariff escalations or retaliatory actions could erode industrial activity and fuel sales. Second, OPEC+ strategy: with the bloc unconstrained in raising output, additional production could overwhelm tepid demand, pushing prices below current levels. The IEA projects supply growth for 2025 at 2.1 mbpd, while demand is seen rising just 700 kbpd.

On the financial front, hedge fund positioning has turned cautious, registering the sharpest drop in bullish sentiment since February. Traders are forecasting narrower price ranges ahead, with elevated volatility as tariff developments hit market headlines.

Forward‑looking forecasts remain mixed. EIA projects Brent to average $68.89 in 2025 and $58.48 in 2026, marking a seasonal decline. Enverus suggests the upside remains intact if demand holds steady, especially with summer driving season underway. Market watchers also note that rising gas‑to‑oil switching costs, refinery restarts and diminished spare capacity could temper price declines.

China’s consumption is also under scrutiny. While Beijing seeks to stimulate growth through fiscal and monetary tools, investor sentiment remains fragile. Saudi’s decision to push prices higher was based on perceived strengthening in Chinese demand, but many analysts caution that any slow‑down could rapidly tip the balance.

Emerging long‑term trends offer some balance. IEA’s long‑term outlook suggests oil demand will continue rising through the late 2020s, driven by non‑OECD economies and slower clean‑energy adoption, delaying peak demand beyond 2030. Nonetheless, short‑term price direction seems firmly tied to macroeconomic risks and geopolitical dynamics.

A UAE delegation, under the leadership of Omran Sharaf, Assistant Foreign Minister for Advanced Science and Technology, has completed visits to the Netherlands and Belgium aimed at expanding strategic collaboration in R&D and critical advanced technologies. The two-day mission centred on forging partnerships in areas including AI, space, health and nanoelectronics.

Sharaf, who oversaw the Emirates Mars Mission and now leads the UAE’s science diplomacy efforts, engaged Dutch counterparts such as Vice Minister Michiel Sweers and Cyber Affairs Ambassador Ernst Noorman. Meetings with Erwin Nijsse and Harm van de Wetering from the ministries of innovation and space respectively focussed on aligning the UAE’s science ambitions with Dutch expertise.

A highlight was a high-level roundtable featuring public and private stakeholders, where both sides discussed collaborative initiatives in artificial intelligence, space tech, biotechnology and broader scientific research. Key Dutch institutions – including TNO, Deltares, ASML and Eindhoven University of Technology – were visited to explore joint applied research programmes spanning water management, semiconductor innovation and university- industry linkages.

The delegation’s mission concluded with a visit to the imec headquarters and labs in Leuven, Belgium. Imec, a globally recognised centre for nanoelectronics and digital innovation led by CEO Luc Van den Hove, is home to over 5,500 researchers and reported revenue of €846 million in 2022. The UAE delegation toured imec’s facilities to investigate potential partnerships involving semiconductor research, AI hardware and future communications.

Beyond institutional visits, UAE participants included Nouf Al Hameli, Science and Technology Adviser to Sharaf’s ministry, alongside representatives from EDGE Group, Dubai Future Foundation, MGX, G42 and the Technology Innovation Institute under the Advanced Technology Research Council. Their presence signals a cross‑sector push to integrate government, defence, private sector and academic R&D capabilities.

The timing of the visit aligns with Europe’s ambition to build technological autonomy. In May, EU officials emphasised the importance of domestic AI chip production to strengthen technological sovereignty. The UAE, keen on diversifying its tech ecosystem, stands to benefit from Dutch and Belgian strengths in microelectronics, photonics and applied AI.

Analysts note that such collaboration is consistent with a UAE strategy that blends national ambition with international partnerships. Sharaf himself has deep domain credibility: a former board member of the UAE Space Agency and chair of the UN Committee on the Peaceful Uses of Outer Space, he led the Emirates Mars Mission, forging global R&D alliances with institutions in the US and Europe.

While official communiqués framed the visits in diplomatic and institutional terms, sources familiar with discussions highlighted potential next steps: co-funded research programmes, joint innovation labs, and student exchange schemes in semiconductor and AI development.

Experts caution, however, that cross-border R&D frameworks require careful alignment. Differences in intellectual property regimes, export controls, and standard-setting processes between the UAE, EU and Belgium must be navigated for meaningful cooperation. Partners are expected to elaborate memoranda of understanding, agreeing on joint funding protocols and industry-academia mechanisms.

UAE’s delegation marks a strategic shift: away from transactional acquisition of tech, and towards co-development through knowledge ecosystems. In engaging flagship institutions like ASML and imec, and government bodies in The Hague, the UAE signals a move to deepen scientific diplomacy alongside its broader economic diversification goals.

The Indian Institute of Technology Delhi has teamed up with TeamLease EdTech to introduce a 24‑week online executive programme in artificial intelligence for healthcare professionals. With live weekend sessions, hands‑on projects and mentorship from leading faculty, the course is scheduled to begin on 1 November 2025, and admissions are open until 31 July 2025.

The programme aims to equip clinicians, engineers, data scientists and med‑tech entrepreneurs with a robust understanding of AI applications across healthcare domains including diagnostics, imaging, risk scoring, hospital operations and public health analytics. Course modules cover foundational topics such as machine learning, deep learning, big data and IoT monitoring of patient data, before progressing to advanced concepts like natural language processing for electronic health records, predictive analytics and AI‑powered dashboards.

Classes will be conducted entirely online on weekends to accommodate working professionals, and participants will work with real clinical datasets and hospital data systems. A capstone project, mentored by IIT Delhi faculty and experts from AIIMS and the med‑tech industry, will enable learners to build deployable AI tools under guidance.

Fee structure is set at ₹1.20 lakh plus 18 per cent GST, payable in two instalments. Eligibility extends to any graduate professional working in healthcare, research, industry or academia with interest in AI, and no prior coding experience is required.

Officials emphasise that AI has moved from optional to essential in modern medicine. Professor Manav Bhatnagar, Head of the Continuing Education Programme at IIT Delhi, highlighted the institute’s goal to develop “next‑gen capabilities that respond to evolving healthcare needs”, adding that the programme will empower professionals to lead this transformation. Shantanu Rooj, Founder and CEO of TeamLease EdTech, noted that the collaboration bridges clinical knowledge and data intelligence to create impactful healthcare solutions.

External analysts point to broader global trends behind the move. The World Economic Forum estimates that AI could add over US $150 billion annually to global healthcare economies through enhanced efficiency and patient outcomes. In India, NITI Aayog and EY forecast the digital healthcare market—driven by AI diagnostics and telemedicine—to exceed $37 billion by 2030.

The curriculum is divided into several thematic blocks: foundational AI methods; clinical and hospital data analytics; predictive modelling; medical imaging and automation; IoT‑based monitoring; EHR and NLP; public health analytics; and design of dashboards and decision‑support tools. Over 10 case studies and numerous hands‑on exercises will ensure participants not only learn theory but also apply skills to real‑world challenges.

On completion, alumni can explore roles such as AI/ML Engineer developing diagnostic models; Healthcare Data Scientist analysing clinical datasets; Clinical AI Researcher validating AI systems in hospital settings; Digital Health Consultant guiding AI adoption; Medical Imaging Analyst interpreting scans; AI Product Manager in health‑tech; or Regulatory/Data Governance Specialist ensuring compliance.

The weekend‑only format promises greater flexibility for busy professionals, with interactive live sessions and opportunities to network with CIOs, med‑tech founders and industry experts. TeamLease EdTech will support the programme delivery and student success, integrating technology platforms with IIT Delhi’s academic oversight.

Applications close on 31 July 2025. The programme will run from 1 November 2025 through early May 2026. Prospective applicants are directed to IIT Delhi’s Continuing Education Programme portal for registration and scholarship information.

This launch positions IIT Delhi and TeamLease at the forefront of AI‑driven healthcare education, anticipating a future where data intelligence plays a transformative role in patient care, system efficiency and population health outcomes.

Elon Musk has claimed that Grok, the artificial intelligence chatbot developed by his company xAI, was deliberately manipulated to generate favourable responses about Adolf Hitler, prompting a wave of alarm within the AI and tech communities. The billionaire entrepreneur further asserted that Grok would soon unlock radical scientific discoveries, including “new technologies” and “new physics”, without offering any evidence or scientific basis for these projections.

The claims emerged during a series of public posts made by Musk on his social media platform X, where he alleged that Grok was intentionally fed skewed prompts by certain users in order to produce outputs that could be portrayed as glorifying Nazi ideology. The incident surfaced amid growing scrutiny over the capabilities, guardrails, and ideological neutrality of generative AI models.

According to Musk, the manipulation attempt was “malicious” and designed to discredit Grok’s performance by “baiting it into saying something good about Hitler.” He suggested that the prompt engineering tactics employed were calculated to create an outrage cycle, but did not clarify what internal content filters failed or what steps xAI would take to address the issue going forward. Grok, which was integrated into X’s subscription service, has positioned itself as a less censored alternative to AI chatbots offered by rivals.

The controversy erupted after a series of screenshots circulated online allegedly showing Grok responding with positive language about Hitler’s leadership and policies when asked about his historical impact. Although Musk did not confirm the authenticity of those screenshots, he acknowledged that Grok’s response was “not ideal” and promised that xAI would review the platform’s prompt detection and safety layers.

What followed was a more speculative turn from the tech mogul. In subsequent posts, Musk claimed Grok had begun developing what he described as “insights into new physics” and predicted that the model could reveal “entirely new technologies” within a year. The statement has sparked disbelief among AI researchers, who questioned whether such remarks reflected actual advancements or were part of Musk’s pattern of ambitious projections.

Grok is powered by xAI’s proprietary large language model suite, with the latest version, Grok-2, released earlier this year and trained on a dataset integrated with public web content and user interactions. While xAI markets Grok as a model that “loves sarcasm” and is “rebellious,” critics have argued that the platform’s lax content filters make it vulnerable to misuse.

Musk has long been critical of what he perceives as political bias in mainstream AI systems, accusing other companies of embedding left-leaning ideological slants into their models. He launched xAI in 2023 with the stated mission of building “truthful” AI systems, a claim that has drawn scepticism from ethicists concerned about the risks of unmoderated chatbot behaviour. His latest statements, however, shift the conversation from bias to reliability and scientific credibility.

AI experts have expressed concern that the remarks could blur the lines between speculative innovation and misinformation. Several researchers pointed out that while language models can simulate conversations on scientific theories, they are not capable of independently discovering new laws of physics without human-led experimentation and validation.

Musk’s comments about Grok’s future capabilities were vague and lacked any technical documentation or benchmarks to support the assertion. His reference to “new physics” remains undefined, with no elaboration on whether it refers to theoretical frameworks, experimental methods, or model behaviour emergent during training.

The broader industry has been grappling with questions about how much autonomy AI models should have in generating original knowledge, and whether unverified claims from high-profile figures risk misleading the public. As Musk commands a massive online following, some AI professionals worry that casual or speculative language from him could shape public expectations and policy discussions on emerging technology.

Meanwhile, the incident has reignited debates about content moderation, with particular focus on how AI models are safeguarded against manipulation by bad actors. Researchers note that even with prompt filtering, sufficiently complex models can be coaxed into delivering controversial or unsafe content when specific exploit strategies are applied.

Musk’s assertion that Grok had been “tricked” raised questions about xAI’s internal quality control processes and the extent to which the system can discern between benign and provocative queries. The incident also drew comparisons to earlier generative AI controversies involving chatbots from other firms that responded inappropriately when confronted with inflammatory prompts.

Senior officials from Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates and Kuwait have defended the August production boost of 548,000 barrels per day, stating that global markets are absorbing the extra supply without piling up inventories. UAE Energy Minister Suhail al‑Mazrouei told delegates in Vienna that inventories have remained stable despite the accelerated output increases, reflecting genuine consumption growth. Kuwait Petroleum Corp. echoed this view, with its CEO Sheikh Nawaf Al‑Sabah noting strong demand from Asian customers and signalling a tighter market than widely perceived.

Oil markets displayed resilience as Brent crude climbed above $70 a barrel, recovering from an initial dip following the OPEC+ announcement. Analysts cite robust summer travel demand, Middle East geopolitical strains—such as intermittent Houthi attacks in the Red Sea—and tighter fuel product cracks as underpinning near‑term market firmness. The supply surge, although substantial, has not yet triggered signs of oversupply. OECD stock levels remain flat, while US Strategic Petroleum Reserve levels stay well below maximum, pointing to a balanced market setup and sustained product demand.

The OPEC+ decision marks an acceleration of a reversal programme that began in April with a modest 138,000 bpd increase, followed by three successive monthly hikes of 411,000 bpd. The latest announcement represents a strategic shift: rather than merely unwinding voluntary cuts, producers are intent on reclaiming market share and anchoring long-term stability. Saudi Arabia, which had shouldered most of the original production curbs, is now pushing ahead to restore output levels much faster than previously scheduled.

UAE officials emphasise fundamentals over headlines, asserting that additional barrels were essential to maintain equilibrium rather than depress prices. “We haven’t seen a major buildup in inventories, which means the market needed those barrels,” al‑Mazrouei said, stressing the need for steady investment in oil infrastructure. Kuwait’s Sheikh Nawaf further highlighted sustained demand growth—particularly in Asia—estimating additional global need of up to 1.3 million bpd over the year and pointing to record-high shipments from his country in June.

Supporting evidence emerges in price trend analysis. Despite the supply increase, Brent crude closed near $69–$70 per barrel, with West Texas Intermediate at approximately $68. Reuters reported a 1 per cent rise in oil prices shortly after the announcement, driven by stronger-than-expected demand signals and a dip in US production projections. Market commentary suggests that the anticipated supply surplus may not materialise until later in the year, allowing current price support to persist.

However, concern is building among forecasters regarding the risk of supply outpacing demand in the months ahead. Analysts at ING and Bloomberg caution that cumulative increases—including a potential similar rise in September—could tilt the market towards surplus by winter. Goldman Sachs predicts Brent could drop to an average of $59 in the fourth quarter if these trendlines hold. Such projections underscore the delicate balance between stabilising markets today and sowing the seeds of tomorrow’s oversupply.

Geopolitical factors continue to sway market sentiment. Renewed attacks by Houthi forces on shipping lanes in the Red Sea have boosted risk premiums and contributed to diverging regional price dynamics. In conjunction with potential US tariffs on trade partners, these developments inject layers of complexity into demand forecasts and shipping routes. Meanwhile, softer oil output projections from US shale producers, prompted by lower prices this year, have lent additional upward momentum to benchmarks.

Central to OPEC+ strategy is ensuring investment resilience in producing countries. UAE highlighted underinvestment concerns, warning that deferred spending could undermine long-term supply stability. The August lift, they argue, responds to both short-term demand and the need to signal commitment to investors. Kuwait pointed to customer outreach as evidence of healthy demand and stressed its competitive edge in terms of low-cost, lower-carbon intensity oil—a differentiator in markets such as China, Japan and South Korea.

Market analysts remain split on the outlook. Enverus Intelligence Research recently contended that prevailing data does not support a bearish narrative, noting flat stock levels in OECD countries, strong seasonal consumption, and resilient cracks. By contrast, energy consultancy FGE flagged the limitations of ramping up production, citing member compliance and infrastructure constraints that may prevent full implementation of quotas—particularly in Iraq and Kazakhstan.