News related to
research

Asia‑Pacific digital‑native firms attracted USD 15.4 billion in artificial intelligence investment in 2024, a figure reported by IDC that underscores a shift towards deeper commitments and strategic growth, even as the volume of deals declined.

Capital concentration has intensified as larger funding rounds become the norm. IDC analysts found that while the number of funded AI startups has dropped, the average investment per deal has risen markedly—reflecting investors’ preference for enterprises closer to market maturity rather than early-stage ventures.

China, South Korea, Japan and India remain at the forefront of investment flows. These major markets, with their diverse tech ecosystems and supportive policies, continue to lead, though Southeast Asian nations are gaining traction as both AI adopters and innovators.

Generative AI, a wave propelled by breakthrough models in natural-language processing and image creation, is swiftly ascending as the dominant investment theme across Asia‑Pacific. IDC forecasts that GenAI allocations will more than double by 2028, reaching USD 54.5 billion and forging a new frontier for enterprise transformation.

There is mounting evidence that corporations are pivoting from rhetoric to implementation. Only 29 percent of digital‑native businesses have scaled AI organisation‑wide, yet more than 42 percent now actively pursue co‑innovation partnerships with technology vendors to integrate AI across operations. These collaborative efforts are reshaping collaboration models between AI startups and incumbents.

Costs associated with infrastructure and data security continue to shape investment flows. Enterprise-grade AI demands not only computational muscle but also robust governance frameworks to mitigate risks such as bias, intellectual property leakage and regulatory non‑compliance. Data from the region show that 34 percent of organisations have embedded governance within generative AI software development, an advanced step beyond policy‑level oversight.

Cloud infrastructure providers are doubling down on AI support across Asia‑Pacific. Amazon Web Services announced a USD 13 billion expansion in Australia and over USD 5 billion for a Taiwan region, alongside large‑scale investments in Singapore, Malaysia and Japan. AWS claims the region’s cloud spending will reach USD 250 billion in 2025, largely driven by AI demands.

This inflow of cloud capital is critical in overcoming entry barriers. Local language support, data sovereignty and integration capabilities have become competitive differentiators for these platforms—Microsoft Azure, Google Cloud and Alibaba Cloud are aggressively pursuing similar capacity expansion. Southeast Asia, in particular, is emerging as the fastest–growing regional cloud market globally.

Startups are adapting to investors’ sharper focus on maturity and scalability. Fewer low‑valuation seed rounds are appearing; instead, late‑stage funding for companies with clear product‑market fit, real revenue streams and enterprise traction is dominating. This trend reflects an increasingly risk‑averse capital environment that emphasises depth over breadth.

The build‑up of AI infrastructure is dovetailing with rising regulatory attention. With supervision frameworks being rolled out around sensitive sectors such as finance and healthcare, investors are seeking startups equipped with compliance capabilities. For instance, financial‑services firms are prioritising traceability and governance as mission‑critical components for future‑ready AI deployment.

In geographical terms, growth hotspots vary by stage of AI ecosystem development. China leads in institutional funding and government-backed initiatives. Japan and South Korea benefit from combined strengths in industrial automation, robotics and semiconductor production. India’s vibrant startup landscape is gaining attention, particularly in generative AI and enterprise software. Meanwhile, nations such as Indonesia and Malaysia are attracting more attention as AI adoption becomes a priority for government digitalisation agendas.

Challenges persist. High‑cost infrastructure, skilled‑talent shortages and fragmented regulatory regimes pose constraints. Yet the rise of public‑private coalitions and university‑industry alliances is beginning to address these gaps—skills acceleration programmes are proliferating, and data‑sharing frameworks are gaining traction.

Investors are now looking past headline metrics to evaluate alignment with national AI strategies, such as Japan’s AI strategy and India’s push for indigenous innovation. Locally relevant models—capable of understanding linguistic diversity, cultural contexts, and industry‑specific workflows—are increasingly being favoured over globalised, one‑size‑fits‑all solutions.

This funding environment has spurred momentum in adjacent areas. Edge computing, AI‑enabled cybersecurity, AI‑driven supply‑chain optimisation and health‑tech verticals are emerging as new battlegrounds for both startups and incumbents. These sub‑domains are drawing fresh rounds of investment and pilot partnerships.

Policy trends are also influential. Governments across Asia‑Pacific are advancing data protection frameworks, AI ethics norms and public‑sector adoption plans—all contributing to clearer roadmaps for private‑sector engagement. The interlinking of regulatory reform and capital deployment is strengthening ecosystem resilience.

Investor sentiment remains cautiously optimistic. Surveys suggest that, despite macroeconomic headwinds and geopolitical risk, most executives view cloud and AI as avenues to cost reduction, efficiency gains and differentiation. As AWS’s APAC vice‑president remarked, “AI is the biggest market opportunity since cloud in 2006,” signalling sustained confidence in long‑term upside.

Federal Authority for Identity, Citizenship, Customs and Port Security has issued a strong and authoritative rebuttal to claims circulating that the United Arab Emirates is offering lifetime Golden Visas to certain nationalities. In its statement on 8 July, ICP emphasised that Golden Visa eligibility is strictly governed by existing laws, ministerial decisions, and official regulations. Applications are processed only via UAE government channels—no consultancy firm, internal or external, has legitimate authority to promise visa grants under simplified conditions.

The statement was prompted by alleged press releases from a foreign consultancy office claiming applicants could secure lifetime Golden Visas for all categories from abroad. ICP characterised these claims as legally baseless and made without coordination with UAE authorities. Following these claims, several Indian and UAE-based outlets reportedly published the information before the ICP clarified its position.

While ICP refrains from naming the specific consultancy, it has warned of impending legal action against entities using false promises to extract money from individuals seeking long-term residency in the UAE. “Entities spreading such false information [are] exploiting [people’s] hopes for a dignified life,” the authority stated. It urged the public to verify procedures through official sources, including its website and app, or by contacting the designated call centre at 600522222.

The ICP insisted that the Golden Visa framework remains unchanged: eligibility criteria, procedural regulations, and visa categories continue to be defined by UAE law and ministerial orders alone. The visa remains accessible only to those meeting these statutory provisions, and all processes must follow the established, government-operated digital platforms.

This response comes amid a broader pattern of misinformation regarding Golden Visa eligibility. Earlier this month, another wave of misleading reports claimed investors in digital currencies—particularly in Toncoin—had qualified for a ten-year Golden Visa by staking cryptocurrency. In response, ICP, alongside the Securities and Commodities Authority and the Virtual Assets Regulatory Authority, issued a joint statement rejecting those claims and reminded the public that cryptocurrency investment is not a recognised category for Golden Visa issuance.

Under the official programme, Golden Visa eligibility remains targeted to specific categories: real-estate investors, entrepreneurs, exceptional talents, qualified professionals, scientists and researchers, high-performing graduates and students, frontline workers, humanitarian pioneers, and notable maritime asset holders. The ICP reaffirmed that these criteria are set in accordance with legal frameworks and are unchanged by the rumours.

Despite the cross-border spread of misinformation, UAE authorities appear resolute in their commitment to transparency, integrity, and regulatory enforcement. The ICP has stated that all application processes must occur through official digital services, and only those platforms bear the authority to collect fees or accept documentation. Third-party entities claiming to facilitate visa applications risk legal consequences.

Experts underscore the potential fallout from such false claims. “Misleading promises fuel public confusion and pose reputational risks for the UAE’s visa systems,” noted one legal analyst based in Dubai, requesting anonymity. Misinformation casts doubt on the authenticity of the Golden Visa programme and could encourage fraud. UAE authorities increasingly rely on legal measures and public advisories to counteract false narratives.

The timing of this clarification aligns with heightened international interest in UAE residency schemes. In early July, news emerged that the UAE was piloting a streamlined lifetime Golden Visa pathway for Indian nationals under the UAE‑India Comprehensive Economic Partnership Agreement. Under the pilot, eligible Indian applicants could receive life-long residency without property investment, upon nomination and the payment of AED 100,000. This development appears to have driven a surge in media attention and consultation requests aimed at service providers.

While the ICP has not confirmed or elaborated on a pilot programme specific to any nationality, it advised the public to seek information strictly through official platforms. Interested parties are encouraged to consult the ICP website or app for updates on visa categories, including any new arrangements introduced under international agreements.

Signals from the UAE government reflect a dual strategy: expanding its talent- and investment-focused Golden Visa system, while firmly safeguarding procedural integrity. Through legislative collaboration, digital transformation, and cross-border trade agreements, the UAE continues to enhance its residency framework. However, officials remain vigilant against exploitation and fraudulent intermediaries.

As the visa environment evolves, clarity from ICP and associated authorities remains vital. Their recent intervention serves to remind the public that any deviations from established criteria are unauthorised and legally questionable. For those pursuing Golden Visa status, due diligence and reliance on official channels are indispensable.

UAE authorities have categorically dismissed claims that cryptocurrency investors can secure a 10‑year golden residency visa, stating that such privileges are reserved for specific sectors such as real-estate investors, entrepreneurs, top-tier talents, scientists, specialists, leading students and graduates, humanitarian pioneers and frontline workers.

In a joint statement, the Federal Authority for Identity, Citizenship, Customs and Port Security, the Securities and Commodities Authority and the Virtual Assets Regulatory Authority made clear that no visa pathway exists based solely on digital asset investment. The clarification, issued in response to social media promotions tied to TON coin staking, noted that licensed companies dealing in virtual assets must follow standard visa procedures set by Dubai authorities—contradicting any assertion of automatic long-term residency for such investors.

The declaration emphasised that golden residencies, formally known as “golden visas,” are awarded selectively. Eligible recipients include individuals contributing significantly through real-estate acquisition, entrepreneurship, exceptional professional or academic achievements, humanitarian efforts, scientific innovation and frontline services. Digital asset holders, including those with TON coin, are not part of this framework.

VARA underscored that any licensed firm engaged in virtual assets must adhere strictly to visa regulations approved by Dubai’s government. The authority explicitly stated that TON is not among the licensed virtual asset service providers regulated by VARA—which serves as a reminder that third-party programme claims cannot confer regulatory endorsement or visa rights.

Market reactions were swift. TON’s market value dropped roughly 6% after the regulators’ denial, reversing an earlier 10% rally sparked by reports suggesting that staking over $100,000 of the cryptocurrency for three years would qualify investors for golden residency. The dip reflects investor recalibration, as participants digest the official position.

Crypto-focused platforms including Cointelegraph and CryptoBriefing reported that the golden visa narrative around TON did not originate from UAE government entities, but from promotional efforts tied to TON itself or affiliates. Such promotions framed virtual-asset investments as viable residency routes, a stance regulators assert is misleading.

Historically, the UAE has granted golden visas to boost innovation and long-term commitment within its economic ecosystem. Introduced in 2019, the visa allows extended residency ranging from five to ten years for designated groups, including investors, researchers, medical professionals, outstanding students, frontline responders and humanitarian workers. The UAE’s focus has been on attracting tangible economic and social capital—not speculative virtual-asset portfolios.

The political economy of the golden visa scheme underscores the government’s desire to diversify its talent pool while retaining high-calibre individuals. Notably, real-estate investors must typically commit AED 2 million or more, and entrepreneurs require projects valued at least AED 500,000, alongside approved incubator backing. There is no parallel threshold for cryptocurrency holdings.

VARA’s clarification additionally served as a broader caution to the public, urging consumers to engage only with fully licensed and regulated entities in the virtual-asset space. This aligns with the authority’s ongoing efforts to mitigate risk, prevent fraud, and ensure compliance within the rapidly evolving crypto sector.

Legal analysts note that agencies like ICP, SCA and VARA carry statutory authority over immigration, securities and virtual asset regulation, respectively—a strong indicator that their joint statement holds legal weight. Any company or platform claiming otherwise could face regulatory investigation for misleading representations.

Industry experts praised the clarity of the communication, saying it helps dispel misconceptions among investors attracted by sensational claims. “Regulation must keep pace with innovation,” commented one Dubai-based compliance specialist. “But investors also bear responsibility to verify claims, particularly when residency and investment are involved.”

Within the wider crypto ecosystem, this development is neither isolated nor unexpected. Regulators across jurisdictions have increasingly emphasised that digital-asset holdings alone rarely guarantee immigration benefits. The UAE’s decisive response may serve as a model for governments balancing openness to innovation with prudence in immigration policy.

Moving forward, observers will watch closely whether the UAE institutes any formal framework for crypto-linked residency benefits. VARA and SCA have previously launched licensing regimes for exchanges and service providers, hinting at a broader regulatory ecosystem under development. However, until there is explicit policy inclusion, golden visa eligibility remains restricted to well-defined categories.

Legal scholars suggest that should UAE authorities wish to incorporate virtual-asset investment into residency policy, formal amendments would need to be tabled via corporate regulations and immigration law. Meanwhile, the current guidelines offer clear instruction: digital asset investment, regardless of size, is not sufficient to obtain a golden residency in the UAE.

Dubai’s Knowledge and Human Development Authority has confirmed that three esteemed international institutions—the Indian Institute of Management Ahmedabad, the American University of Beirut, and Saudi Arabia’s Fakeeh College for Medical Sciences—will launch branch campuses in the emirate for the 2025–26 academic year. This move aligns with Dubai’s strategic Education 33 and broader Dubai Economic Agenda D33, designed to enhance its status as a global education hub.

The Indian Institute of Management Ahmedabad is renowned for its Business and Management programme, currently ranked 27th globally by the QS World University Rankings by subject. The American University of Beirut holds a position of 237th in the overall QS World University Rankings. Fakeeh College for Medical Sciences brings specialised strength in health and medical education to Dubai’s portfolio.

Dr Wafi Dawood, CEO of KHDA’s Strategic Development Sector, emphasised that the initiative “reflects the emirate’s international stature” and aligns with goals to enhance graduate competitiveness, boost educational tourism ten-fold by 2033, broaden Emirati workforce integration, and bolster economic diversification. The strategy also aims to see international students making up 50 per cent of Dubai’s higher education population by 2033, contributing an estimated AED 5.6 billion to the sector’s GDP.

Dubai’s higher education ecosystem already includes 41 private international providers—37 of which are branch campuses—including the University of Manchester Dubai and University of Birmingham Dubai, whose home institutions rank 35th and 76th respectively in QS 2026. Curtin University Dubai and University of Wollongong in Dubai also feature within the top 200 global rankings.

The emirate recorded a 20 per cent rise in total private university enrolment for 2024–25, with international students growing by 29 per cent to reach over 42,000 across more than 700 programmes. This marks the highest student population to date in Dubai’s sector.

A broader pipeline is in place, with several other globally ranked institutions currently in advanced discussions with KHDA to establish Dubai campuses. The initiative supports Dubai’s ambition to position itself among the world’s top ten cities for university education by 2033.

Dubai International Academic City, the emirate’s dedicated higher education zone, accommodates around 27,500 students across 27 colleges and three innovation centres, offering over 500 programmes. Many of the new branch campuses are expected to be located within DIAC or Dubai Knowledge Park, reinforcing the emirate’s capacity for transnational education.

Amid growing demand, student housing projects have expanded to meet the needs of a diverse population representing more than 150 nationalities. Dubai’s education authorities have also prioritised research collaboration and academic innovation through cross-border partnerships, consistent with KHDA’s quality framework.

Bitcoin is a crypto in the CRYPTO market.
The price is 107761.0 USD currently with a change of -1627.00 USD from the previous close.
The intraday high is 110000.0 USD and the intraday low is 107741.0 USD.

Whale Exodus, Institutional Surge Define Bitcoin Landscape

A profound shift in Bitcoin ownership is underway as early large holders—or “whales”—have offloaded more than 500,000 BTC over the past year, while institutions such as spot ETFs, corporate treasuries and asset managers have collectively swooped up nearly 900,000 BTC. That haul now places institutional ownership at roughly 4.8 million BTC, equivalent to 25% of the total ~20 million supply.

This reshaping of ownership has already led to a marked decrease in price volatility. Deribit’s 30-day BTC Volatility Index sits at its lowest point in around two years, a trend noted by industry figures such as DRW’s Rob Strebel and Arca’s Jeff Dorman, who have characterised Bitcoin’s market as transitioning from a speculative instrument to “slow‑burn” portfolio allocation. As a result, analysts are revising expectations downward, now forecasting restrained annual returns in the region of 10–20%, rather than expecting sharp bull‑run surges.

The price has stabilised around US $110,000, reflecting the dampening effect of institutional inflows against whale outflows. However, experts caution that this equilibrium may be fragile: if whales continue to sell and institutional inflows cool, Bitcoin could become vulnerable to abrupt corrections, echoing past events when relatively modest outflows of 2% in 2018 and 9% in 2022 triggered collapses of 74% and 64% respectively.

The implications of this structural change extend beyond price mechanics. When whales use institutional venues as an exit route—via ETF conversions or corporate treasuries—they secure liquidity that can facilitate large-scale unwinds without triggering immediate volatility. Critics like Hilary Allen argue this may leave smaller stakeholders exposed in the event of a broader downturn.

Regulatory evolution has played a pivotal role. The introduction of U. S. spot BTC ETFs in January 2024 and subsequent inflows have legitimised institutional participation, with major asset managers—BlackRock, Fidelity and MicroStrategy among them—establishing significant positions, enhancing market depth and resilience.

Interlinked macroeconomic conditions have further shaped trends. A weaker U. S. dollar, increased money supply, rising equity markets and higher mining costs—due to energy pricing—have slowed new issuance, tilting supply‑demand dynamics in Bitcoin’s favour and reinforcing institutional demand.

Nonetheless, the transformation is not without nuance. The repricing of Bitcoin—as volatility subsides—could dampen the appeal among short‑term traders and retail participants who previously thrived on speculative swings. Meanwhile, institutional models of “faster money” mean that large‑scale monthly or quarterly rebalancing could trigger intermittent volatility spikes.

Market observers are now closely monitoring whale behavioural patterns and ETF flow data to gauge whether institutional appetite will sustain. Markus Thielen from 10x Research suggests this transition could define Bitcoin’s identity for years, positioning it for steady, long‑term growth at 10–20% annually—but warns that the absence of new inflows may precipitate sharp market corrections.

BlackRock’s iShares Bitcoin Trust has overtaken its flagship S&P 500 ETF, IVV, in annual fee revenue, marking a significant shift in investor interest. IBIT now generates approximately $187.2 million a year, edging ahead of IVV’s $187.1 million—remarkable given IBIT’s substantially smaller asset base and higher fees.

Since launching in January 2024, IBIT has attracted roughly $52 billion in net inflows—nearly 96% of all capital entering U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs—and now accounts for more than 55% of the category’s assets. Its success has propelled assets under management to around $72–75 billion, with the fund achieving the fastest-ever climb to $70 billion in just 341 trading days.

The rapid accumulation reflects shifting institutional sentiment. Analysts note that investors are increasingly willing to pay premium fees—IBIT charges 0.25% versus IVV’s mere 0.03%—for access to Bitcoin exposure within trusted regulated vehicles. Nate Geraci, president of the ETF Store, said the milestone “reflects both surging investor demand for Bitcoin and significant fee compression in core equity exposure”.

While fee revenue for IBIT now tops IVV, critics caution that underlying volatility in Bitcoin has diminished, bringing it closer to traditional equity benchmarks. ETF analyst Eric Balchunas noted that IBIT’s volatility—once over five times that of equities—has softened significantly, attributing this partly to institutional scale and maturing market dynamics.

IBIT is also directing the vast majority of new capital entering spot Bitcoin ETFs. Over the past 15 trading days, U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs have drawn nearly $5 billion in inflows; IBIT alone captured more than 80% of this flow, including $112 million on the final trading day of June. Its individual inflow streak totalled $3.8 billion before plateauing.

Despite its dominance, IBIT has not been immune to market fluctuations. Bitcoin-related ETFs experienced a $342 million outflow in a single day, ending a 15-day positive run. That pause included IBIT seeing no inflows that day, although analysts like Valentin Fournier at BRN Lead Research cautioned it may reflect a temporary cooldown rather than a shift in sentiment.

BlackRock’s success with IBIT is emblematic of broader trends identified by financial research. According to S&P Global, appetite for digitally‑focused funds remains robust, particularly where institutional frameworks offer clarity and accessibility. The Financial Times highlighted that active ETFs—especially crypto and options‑focused products—are capturing disproportionate fee income relative to passive counterparts, driven by higher demand and pricing flexibility.

Regulatory stability since January 2024 has facilitated IBIT’s ascent, making it easier for large-scale investors to allocate to cryptocurrency via mainstream platforms. This institutional flow has, in turn, helped reduce price volatility in Bitcoin itself, narrowing the gap with traditional ETFs.

Yet questions persist about longevity. IBIT’s future depends on sustaining investor interest amid macroeconomic shifts and evolving competition. Emerging Bitcoin ETFs from competitors like Fidelity’s FBTC and Ark Invest’s ARKB are gaining attention, though they trail IBIT significantly. Institutional scrutiny also remains vigilant, focused on fund liquidity, asset custody, and regulatory compliance.

BlackRock is expanding its digital asset strategy beyond the U.S., with plans to introduce a bitcoin ETF in Europe, potentially domiciled in Switzerland, contingent on MiCA framework compliance.

BlackRock’s benchmark S&P 500 ETF, IVV, retains its massive $600+ billion in assets. Though still the industry cornerstone, its fee income has been outstripped for the first time—by a product founded on the dynamic, historically volatile Bitcoin market. The shift underscores a pivotal moment in ETF evolution, as Bitcoin transitions from niche digital asset to mainstream portfolio inclusion.

PoliCloud has closed a €7.5 million seed funding round led by Global Ventures, with participation from MI8, OneRagtime, Inria and others, to accelerate its expansion of sovereign, decentralised cloud infrastructure aimed at European governments, enterprises and SMEs.

The Cannes‑based firm will deploy the capital to bolster its operational team, scale micro‑data centre deployment across Europe and target public sector clients that need secure, locally governed cloud services.

Founded in February 2025 by serial fintech entrepreneur David Gurlé, PoliCloud delivers containerised micro‑data centres housing proprietary hardware integrated with Hivenet’s distributed storage and computing software. Early traction includes four sold units and projected revenues in excess of €6 million by the end of 2025.

The firm’s micro‑data centres—equipped with up to 104 GPUs per unit and expected to scale beyond 1,000 GPUs by year‑end—are designed for high‑performance computing, AI processing and encrypted data storage, offering reduced dependency on US‑based cloud giants and enhanced compliance with European data sovereignty standards.

“PoliCloud is meeting a critical market demand for sovereign cloud infrastructure that is not only secure and abundant but also eco‑responsible,” Gurlé stated, underscoring an ambition to deliver affordable, decentralised compute infrastructure across the continent.

Global Ventures Senior Partner Simon Sharp explained the investment thesis, emphasising a need for visionary entrepreneurs offering solutions with clear market demand and global potential. The firm previously backed Hivenet in 2022 and views PoliCloud as a strategic addition to its portfolio.

OneRagtime CEO Stéphanie Hospital and Mi8 Managing Director Guillaume Dhamelincourt echoed the sentiment, citing the increasing demand for affordable, secure and sustainable computing power in Europe. Inria’s participation aligned with its strategic mission to support decentralised computing as a way to bolster France’s digital autonomy.

Industry analysts note that the cloud infrastructure sector in Europe has drawn significant venture investment, particularly in sovereign and AI-ready platforms. PoliCloud stands out for combining hardware innovation, distributed software architecture and environmental responsibility—promising 75% lower CO₂ emissions and zero‑water waste per unit.

PoliCloud’s edge compute strategy is being viewed as a potential game‑changer in the context of accelerating AI adoption. It offers municipalities, research institutions and regulated industries the flexibility to deploy GPU‑rich, GDPR‑compliant infrastructure locally, rather than relying on centralised hyperscalers.

Operating from Cannes, the company has so far sold four units within three months of its February launch at the World AI Cannes Festival. Hardware specifics remain under wraps, though insiders suggest each container may host more than 100 GPUs, with a roadmap targeting up to 10,000 GPUs by the end of 2026.

The €7.5 million lifeline will be used to recruit additional talent, fund technical development, scale production of micro‑data centres and initiate roll‑out across multiple European markets.

Abu Dhabi has claimed the top spot, with Dubai close behind, in a ranking of 97 global markets compiled by Cushman & Wakefield in its 2025 Global Data Center Market Comparison. The analysis, which evaluated 20 critical factors—from power availability and fibre connectivity to development pipelines and land pricing—places Abu Dhabi first and Dubai second among emerging data centre markets.

The report highlights a surge in demand for digital infrastructure, driven primarily by hyperscalers, cloud providers and burgeoning AI workloads. Abu Dhabi stands out with exceptional scores for power delivery timelines and cost-effective land, placing it at the very top of the emerging markets category. Dubai, closely following, benefits from robust fibre connectivity and an accelerating development pipeline.

Power availability remains the most pivotal concern across the industry. The study indicates that markets with secure, rapid power delivery attract developer attention, particularly where leading markets are experiencing delays in grid expansion. Abu Dhabi’s superior performance in this metric has become a magnet for hyperscale players and colocation operators alike, while Dubai earns marks for its strategic integration of infrastructure and favourable regulatory policy.

Pre-leasing rates further support the UAE’s ascendancy. Both Abu Dhabi and Riyadh report pre-commitments exceeding 70% on under-construction capacity, a figure surpassing most emerging markets and rivalled only by select Western hubs. This signals strong occupier confidence, as large tenants lock in space well ahead of completion.

Regional momentum is reinforced by Research and Markets, which notes that Abu Dhabi currently accounts for nearly 40% of the UAE’s upcoming data centre power capacity, with an additional 60 MW projected by the end of 2025. Sector observers estimate cumulative investment in UAE-based facilities will approach US $2.5 billion by 2026.

Global trends underscore the link between power constraints and shifting demand. While longstanding markets such as Northern Virginia and Chicago continue to dominate in operational capacity, power scarcity is pushing hyperscalers into newer regions. In Europe and APAC, markets with strong power fundamentals—particularly those offering renewable options—have seen elevated pre-leasing and accelerated construction.

In EMEA, nine of the 97 markets reviewed boast pre-lease ratios above 50%, with Milan and Berlin achieving full commitments on live builds. However, Abu Dhabi’s combination of policy support, infrastructure coordination, and land pricing renders it the leading emerging centre. Dubai’s consistent performance spots it firmly in second place.

Local dynamics also support the UAE’s climb. Emerging Middle Eastern hubs benefit from coordinated government strategies: jurisdictions like Abu Dhabi and Dubai leverage economic zones, expedited permitting, and public-private partnerships to secure both digital and energy infrastructure. These are precisely the variables weighed in the 20-factor comparison.

UAE operators are actively building modern facilities to meet new IT standards and power densities. Major entities—including government-backed developers and international names—are focused on deploying Tier III and IV facilities equipped for high-power AI use‑cases. Expectations of sovereign AI zones are further heightening the appeal of these markets among institutional and hyperscale tenants.

Regional competitors, notably Riyadh, also demonstrate strong demand fundamentals. Yet Abu Dhabi and Dubai maintain a lead in deliverability: Abu Dhabi tops the emerging list overall, with superior scores in pre-leasing, fibre availability, and land affordability. Dubai’s edge lies in its connectivity, depth of occupier demand, and policy predictability.

The broader global picture reveals a shift from established hubs to power-rich emerging sites. Worldwide operational IT load now exceeds 40 GW across the tracked markets, yet established centres still dominate capacity. Emerging markets, particularly in the Middle East, have closed ground fast, thanks to streamlined supply chains, liberal regulatory environments, and readiness for power-intensive workloads.