News related to
European

A surge in travellers tracing the on‑screen footsteps of K‑dramas is reshaping tourism across unexpected global landscapes. From lakeside Swiss villages to tranquil Japanese islets and coastal Korean towns, the ‘K‑Wave’ is turning fictional settings into real‑world destinations.

Fans of Crash Landing On You have placed the Swiss lakeside village of Iseltwald on the map. A modest community of 406 residents now sees approximately 1,000 visitors daily at the dock featured in the series. Access fees have yielded nearly 245,000 Swiss francs in 2024, with public toilet revenues adding a further 58,000 francs. Local authorities emphasise that funds are channelled into essential services, including waste management, restroom upkeep and additional staffing, rather than generating profit. Authorities also responded to the influx by installing signage and creating an informational website to encourage respectful tourist behaviour.

In Asia, Korea’s own locales continue to benefit from film‑induced tourism. Following the broadcast of Winter Sonata, visits to Nami Island soared, rising from 250,000 to over 650,000 — the iconic kissing‑spot statue now a pilgrimage for fans. Similarly, Hometown Cha‑Cha‑Cha elevated Pohang’s tourism profile, revitalising its commercial district, while Yangju’s Chang Ucchin Museum of Art attracted enquiries after featuring in episode twelve, prompting VR‑based fan tours leveraging immersive content.

This pattern extends beyond Korea. Swiss sites exemplify how global K‑drama audiences are contributing to local economies, especially in destinations outside traditional tourism circuits. The case of Iseltwald illustrates both the economic boost and the logistical strains of sudden fame. On the other hand, domestic examples underline how coordinated efforts—with content, tourism boards and local authorities collaborating—can shape sustained visitor interest.

Tourism experts note a broader shift: entertainment has become a powerful impetus for travel, transcending conventional marketing. The emotional investment viewers feel with characters and storylines often precedes a desire to experience the settings firsthand. In South Korea, advertisers and tourism agencies have capitalised on this trend. Data from 2025 shows searches for Seoul increased by 30 per cent in the first half of the year, while Busan’s surged by 50 per cent, fuelled by exposure in K‑dramas and social media travel content. Over 32 per cent of young global travellers cited K‑pop or K‑dramas as their primary reason for visiting, with 60 per cent motivated by food and cultural experiences.

Meanwhile, the broader economic ripple effect is apparent. A recent report highlights that the Korean Wave is driving increases in tourist spending across multiple regions and sectors—far beyond traditional attractions. Cultural soft power, rooted in entertainment, fashion, cuisine and beauty, is proving a more enduring and profitable tourism strategy.

This phenomenon underscores the dual nature of film-induced tourism. On one hand, it delivers tangible economic dividends—reviving rural towns, funding infrastructure, generating income for small businesses. On the other hand, communities face challenges: overburdened infrastructure, privacy concerns, and maintaining authenticity amid influxes of enthusiastic visitors.

The contrast between organic growth in Korean towns and the spontaneous boom in European villages like Iseltwald highlights critical factors. Locally coordinated strategies, preparedness and managed growth tend to yield more sustainable outcomes. Yet even unplanned surges can be harnessed—if responded to with planning, investment and community engagement.

The first half of 2025 marked a significant surge in greenfield foreign direct investment into Saudi Arabia, with the United States leading the charge. American investors drove 61 projects, injecting $2.7 billion into the Kingdom’s economy, accounting for nearly a third of both the project count and total investment. This surge highlights the growing confidence of international investors in Saudi Arabia’s Vision 2030 economic reforms and its appeal as a business hub in the region.

According to a report by Emirates NBD, greenfield investments in Saudi Arabia showed a notable increase, both in terms of project volume and capital inflow. In total, 203 greenfield projects were launched in Saudi Arabia during the first half of 2025, marking a 30.1% year-on-year rise. These projects, spanning across various sectors, reflect the country’s strong development trajectory and its efforts to diversify away from oil reliance.

Egypt emerged as the second largest contributor to Saudi Arabia’s greenfield FDI, securing $1.81 billion through 11 projects. Many of these ventures were centered around real estate developments, capitalising on the Kingdom’s expanding urbanisation and demand for residential and commercial properties. Egypt’s growing involvement reflects deeper ties between the two nations, particularly in sectors related to infrastructure and housing.

China, a global FDI powerhouse, played a significant role as well, investing $858.3 million through 11 projects in Saudi Arabia. China’s investments in the Kingdom primarily focused on manufacturing, technology, and energy, complementing the Saudi government’s drive to expand its industrial base and modernise key sectors. Chinese companies are also playing a pivotal role in the development of high-tech infrastructure, which aligns with Saudi Arabia’s push towards a more diversified, knowledge-based economy.

France also made its presence felt, contributing $771.7 million through six greenfield projects. The French investments were primarily focused on technology, retail, and luxury goods, with several high-end brands expanding their operations within the Kingdom. France’s engagement is part of a broader European interest in tapping into Saudi Arabia’s expanding consumer market, particularly in areas linked to fashion, entertainment, and sustainable energy.

The UAE’s regional influence continued to grow, with 25 projects worth $205.3 million being launched in Saudi Arabia. These ventures spanned various industries, with a focus on hospitality, logistics, and real estate. The UAE’s investments underscore the close business ties between the two countries, with the Kingdom remaining a key destination for Emirati capital looking to expand its footprint in the region.

Riyadh, Saudi Arabia’s capital, was the top destination for greenfield FDI, attracting 100 projects valued at $2.3 billion. As the political, economic, and cultural centre of the country, Riyadh continues to benefit from the majority of investments, particularly in the areas of technology, infrastructure, and urban development. Dammam, home to one of the Kingdom’s key industrial hubs, secured 21 projects worth $1.28 billion, while Jeddah followed closely with 13 projects totalling $1.22 billion. These cities represent strategic focal points in Saudi Arabia’s ambitious plans for diversification, driven by growth in manufacturing, logistics, and energy.

Saudi Arabia’s overall greenfield FDI rose by 1.7% to $9.34 billion during the first half of 2025, reflecting the Kingdom’s position as an attractive investment destination. The growth is seen as a direct result of efforts to enhance the ease of doing business in the country and to create a more transparent regulatory environment. Initiatives like the National Industrial Development and Logistics Program and the Saudi Green Initiative have been instrumental in drawing foreign investments into the Kingdom.

China is reportedly on the brink of a significant policy shift that may see the introduction of yuan-backed stablecoins, a move designed to bolster the international standing of its currency. With global financial markets increasingly leaning towards digital currencies, Beijing’s latest plan could mark a pivotal moment in the international adoption of the yuan.

The Chinese government is set to consider a proposal to allow the issuance of stablecoins pegged to the yuan, which would aim to challenge the dominance of the US dollar and its associated stablecoins in global markets. The proposal, expected to be reviewed by the State Council, reflects Beijing’s ongoing strategy to expand the yuan’s reach beyond its traditional borders, positioning it as a competitor to the greenback.

As part of its broader push for digital currency integration, China could allow key financial hubs such as Hong Kong and Shanghai to be the first to implement the new stablecoin systems. These cities are already at the forefront of China’s broader efforts to foster the growth of digital currencies, and the stablecoin initiative could further solidify their roles as global financial centres.

Discussions surrounding the adoption of yuan-backed stablecoins are expected to feature prominently during high-level meetings, including the upcoming Shanghai Cooperation Organisation Summit. This gathering will provide an important platform for Chinese leaders to outline their vision for the future of digital currencies, while signalling their intent to shape international policy on the use of stablecoins.

The planned move is in direct contrast to China’s earlier stance on cryptocurrency regulation. In recent years, the country has imposed strict measures on the use of private cryptocurrencies, citing concerns about financial stability and capital outflows. The proposed policy reversal regarding stablecoins marks a dramatic shift in strategy, moving from a position of stringent control to one of potential global leadership in digital currency innovation.

Stablecoins, which are digital currencies pegged to stable assets like fiat currencies or commodities, have become increasingly popular among investors seeking to minimise volatility. In particular, US dollar-backed stablecoins have grown exponentially, with major players like Tether and USD Coin dominating the market. The success of these assets has prompted China to explore ways in which the yuan can gain a similar foothold in the emerging digital economy.

By introducing a yuan-backed stablecoin, China would not only be promoting its digital currency but also attempting to influence how digital currencies are adopted globally. The move could significantly shift the dynamics of international trade and finance, particularly in Asia. As countries continue to look for alternatives to US dollar-dominated systems, China’s push for a digital yuan is increasingly seen as a strategic move to improve its influence over global financial markets.

Key stakeholders in the financial sector have already begun to take notice of China’s evolving stance on digital currencies. Financial institutions operating in Hong Kong and Shanghai are expected to play an integral role in the rollout of yuan-backed stablecoins, with implications for both domestic and cross-border transactions. Additionally, blockchain technology providers are closely monitoring developments in this space, anticipating a surge in demand for stablecoin-related infrastructure as China accelerates its digital currency ambitions.

The anticipated approval of yuan-backed stablecoins would also contribute to the development of China’s central bank digital currency, the digital yuan. While the digital yuan has already been tested in select regions, the integration of stablecoins would expand the use of digital yuan products, making it more accessible to international markets. This could significantly enhance the usability of China’s digital assets, providing a stable, digital alternative to traditional fiat currencies for global trade and investment.

At the same time, China’s global competitors, particularly the United States and the European Union, are likely to view this move with caution. While the yuan-backed stablecoin could disrupt traditional financial systems, it could also prompt a race to establish new regulatory frameworks and digital currencies to safeguard the dominance of the US dollar and the euro in global markets.

Abu Dhabi’s Mubadala Energy has acquired a 24.1% equity stake in Caturus, a rebranded platform for natural gas and liquefied natural gas exports, following the successful closure of its investment in partnership with alternative asset manager Kimmeridge. This move marks a significant step in Mubadala’s strategy to strengthen its foothold in the US energy market, specifically within the integrated natural gas and LNG sectors.

Mubadala Energy’s involvement in the US market reflects its broader strategy to diversify its portfolio, tapping into high-growth energy markets outside its core base. The company’s new stake in Caturus aligns with its goal to expand its presence in global energy infrastructure, particularly in areas that promise long-term stability and returns.

The deal, valued at an undisclosed sum, solidifies Mubadala Energy’s growing influence in the North American energy sector, which has been experiencing a surge in LNG exports. The US has become a crucial player in the global LNG market, with rising production levels and the establishment of new infrastructure facilitating an increasing flow of exports, particularly to Europe and Asia.

Kimmeridge, a US-based alternative asset manager, has also made substantial strides with its role in Caturus, cementing its position as a key player in energy investments. The collaboration between Mubadala and Kimmeridge is part of a wider effort to create a more integrated and efficient LNG export system, as the two firms look to leverage their combined expertise to drive future growth and development in the sector.

This partnership highlights the growing trend of international energy companies and investment firms looking to the US as a prime location for natural gas and LNG infrastructure. The US energy landscape has seen significant transformation in recent years, with abundant shale gas reserves and increased technological advancements enabling greater extraction and export capabilities.

Caturus itself is designed to optimise the export of LNG, focusing on enhancing infrastructure, improving logistics, and ensuring the delivery of natural gas to international markets with efficiency and minimal environmental impact. The platform’s focus on sustainability aligns with Mubadala’s wider goals of promoting cleaner energy solutions and reducing carbon emissions within its portfolio.

By securing a stake in this critical infrastructure, Mubadala Energy not only diversifies its holdings but also strengthens its role in the ongoing global shift towards cleaner energy sources. The company has committed to transitioning its investments towards more sustainable energy solutions, with a particular focus on natural gas, which is seen as a cleaner alternative to coal and oil in power generation.

Caturus’s strategic location within the US allows it to access key markets, positioning it as a vital part of the LNG export network. With LNG demand increasing globally, particularly in Asia, the platform is well-placed to capitalize on the growing need for cleaner and more sustainable energy options. Mubadala’s participation in this project is expected to enhance its capacity to meet the increasing energy demands of international markets while positioning itself as a responsible player in global energy transitions.

The shift towards LNG and natural gas aligns with broader global energy policies that are looking to reduce carbon emissions and transition away from coal. As countries around the world pursue cleaner alternatives to traditional energy sources, LNG has become an attractive option due to its lower emissions profile compared to coal and oil. The increased export of LNG from the US is particularly important as it helps to meet the energy needs of European and Asian markets, which have increasingly turned to LNG for their energy security needs.

Mubadala Energy’s commitment to sustainability and the environment also underpins this investment. The company has set ambitious goals to reduce its carbon footprint and increase its investments in renewable and low-carbon energy technologies. This aligns with the UAE’s broader energy strategy, which has placed a strong emphasis on cleaner energy, and further reinforces Mubadala’s role in contributing to these global efforts.

US President Donald Trump has announced plans to significantly raise tariffs on exports from India, citing the country’s oil purchases from Russia as the primary reason for the move. The statement marks an escalation in tensions between the two countries, with both sides having clashed over trade policies and geopolitical issues in recent years.

Trump’s remarks, made on social media, have ignited a strong response from New Delhi, which views the threat as unjustified and damaging to its economic interests. The US President criticized India’s ongoing imports of Russian crude oil, calling the move a betrayal, as the West intensifies efforts to isolate Moscow over its invasion of Ukraine. He pointed out that India’s purchases were then being resold on the international market for profits, further compounding the situation.

The US government has consistently condemned the sale of Russian oil to countries that are still buying from Moscow amid global sanctions designed to cripple the Russian economy. These sanctions, which were imposed by the US and its allies in response to Russia’s aggressive actions in Ukraine, have led to a complex diplomatic web, with several nations, including India, caught in the middle.

While the US and European Union have significantly reduced their oil imports from Russia, countries like India and China have stepped in to fill the gap, buying discounted crude oil from Moscow. India, in particular, has ramped up its purchases of Russian energy, a decision that is seen by many as a strategic move to secure energy resources at lower costs. These purchases have helped India maintain its economic growth amidst the energy price crisis exacerbated by the war in Ukraine.

The announcement by Trump that tariffs on Indian goods would be substantially raised could have serious repercussions for trade between the two nations. India is one of the United States’ largest trading partners, and any significant tariffs would undoubtedly affect a range of industries, from agriculture to technology. In 2022, the bilateral trade between the two countries surpassed $150 billion, with India exporting a wide array of goods to the US, including textiles, chemicals, and pharmaceuticals.

The Indian government, however, has rejected Trump’s claims, arguing that its oil purchases from Russia are in line with its energy security needs and do not violate any international laws. New Delhi has maintained a neutral stance on the war in Ukraine, calling for dialogue and diplomacy to resolve the crisis rather than escalating sanctions and pressure on Russia.

India’s position reflects a broader strategy of balancing its foreign relations with both the West and Russia. While it maintains strong ties with the US and Europe, it also values its long-standing relationship with Russia, particularly in defense and energy sectors. Over the years, Russia has been a reliable supplier of defense equipment to India, a factor that continues to shape India’s foreign policy decisions.

The economic impact of higher tariffs could have a ripple effect on both countries’ economies. India could face higher costs for its exports to the US, which might lead to inflationary pressures within certain sectors. For the US, such tariffs could result in higher prices for American consumers on imported goods, potentially exacerbating inflation at a time when the country is already grappling with economic challenges.

The political fallout from Trump’s threat to raise tariffs could further complicate efforts to resolve trade disputes between the US and India. Both nations have been working on strengthening their strategic and economic ties, but issues like tariffs and energy trade could undermine this progress. Negotiations over trade deals, such as the proposed free trade agreement, may now face significant hurdles as both sides dig in their heels.

The decision to increase tariffs on India could also have wider implications for the global economy. It might set a precedent for other nations to retaliate against countries purchasing Russian oil, particularly those in the Global South who have not been willing to fully sever their economic ties with Moscow. This could potentially fragment the global energy market even further, making it harder for countries to secure stable and affordable energy supplies.

This development highlights the growing division between the US-led West and countries that have opted to remain neutral or continue engaging with Russia. As the war in Ukraine shows no sign of abating, the economic and diplomatic repercussions of these decisions are likely to continue shaping global relations for the foreseeable future.

Despite mounting international tensions and growing calls for sanctions, India has confirmed its commitment to continuing oil purchases from Russia. The decision, which has drawn both support and criticism, comes in the face of strong opposition from Western powers, particularly the United States.

India’s robust relationship with Russia, especially in energy sectors, remains central to its strategy to ensure energy security amid global market volatility. While the United States has intensified its warnings against increasing trade with Russia, citing geopolitical risks and the ongoing war in Ukraine, Indian officials assert that the decision aligns with the country’s broader economic interests and long-term energy goals.

The timing of the announcement comes as global oil prices continue to fluctuate, driven by factors ranging from OPEC+ production cuts to the ripple effects of the Russia-Ukraine conflict. With Russia now facing significant sanctions from the West, including oil price caps and restrictions on exports, India has emerged as one of the largest buyers of Russian crude oil, navigating complex international pressures while keeping its energy needs in focus.

India’s oil imports from Russia soared in the wake of the war in Ukraine, particularly after Western nations moved to isolate Moscow from the global market. The country, which historically sourced much of its oil from the Middle East, found Russian oil a lucrative alternative as Western sanctions created discounts, allowing India to tap into a relatively cheap energy supply.

Russia, in turn, welcomed the partnership, as it opened new markets and ensured continued demand for its oil. According to official sources, Russia’s increased sales to India, and other non-Western nations, helped offset some of the lost revenue due to sanctions.

India’s government, however, has been careful to position its stance within a framework of neutrality. Public statements highlight that the nation’s energy decisions are based on its own national interest, focusing primarily on economic stability and the welfare of its people. Officials have also pointed out that India is among the world’s most energy-hungry nations and needs to secure a steady and affordable supply of oil to support its growing population and economic expansion.

Internationally, this trade has sparked debates over the moral and strategic implications of engaging with Russia. Critics argue that by maintaining ties with Russia, India risks undermining global efforts to isolate Moscow, particularly as Western governments seek to enforce stricter sanctions. They point out the tensions between India’s non-alignment policy and its deepening economic relationship with a nation under international scrutiny.

On the other hand, some argue that India’s approach reflects a pragmatic understanding of its own strategic priorities, particularly the need to balance international relationships with domestic requirements. With rising fuel costs and inflation becoming pressing issues for many nations, securing affordable energy resources has become a matter of national security.

India’s oil trade with Russia, however, is not without its challenges. Western nations have long pressured India to reduce its dependence on Russian energy. The Biden administration, particularly, has warned that India’s continued imports could strain relations, especially as the US seeks to maintain solidarity with its European allies in pressuring Russia. Washington’s position on the matter is clear: nations that continue to do business with Russia will face consequences, with potential impacts on trade and geopolitical ties.

Yet, India’s economic and geopolitical imperatives make it unlikely to back down. As part of the BRICS group, which also includes Brazil, Russia, China, and South Africa, India has voiced its commitment to a multipolar world order where nations can pursue their own economic paths, free from external coercion. India has also consistently argued for the need for dialogue and peaceful resolution in the Russia-Ukraine conflict, advocating for diplomacy over military escalation.

The ongoing conflict has undeniably reshaped global energy dynamics, forcing countries to reassess their energy strategies and alignments. While India’s stance has garnered significant attention, its broader approach is seen as part of an evolving foreign policy that seeks to advance national interests without being swayed by external pressures.