News related to
First Half

Syria’s fragile post-war recovery effort gained significant momentum after Saudi Arabia and Qatar pledged to clear the country’s outstanding World Bank debt, a critical step towards unlocking new international funding. The commitment, disclosed following the World Bank and International Monetary Fund spring meetings held last week in Washington, addresses approximately $15 million owed by Damascus, removing a key financial impediment for the new government led by President Ahmed Al-Sharaa.

High-level negotiations between Gulf officials and World Bank representatives culminated in the decision to settle Syria’s arrears, a move regarded by diplomats as essential for enabling the war-torn nation to access multilateral financial assistance. The overdue debt, though relatively modest in scale, had barred Syria from eligibility for fresh disbursements under the World Bank’s policies requiring client countries to be in good standing.

Officials familiar with the discussions indicated that Saudi Arabia and Qatar’s intervention was not merely financial but symbolised broader regional efforts to stabilise Syria’s economy and reintegrate it into international institutions. According to sources briefed on the meetings, both governments framed the payment as part of a larger initiative to support Syria’s economic reconstruction and political transition under Al-Sharaa, who assumed office earlier this year following a contested but internationally recognised electoral process.

President Al-Sharaa, whose government has pledged sweeping economic reforms, welcomed the support, calling it “a step towards restoring Syria’s rightful place in the global community.” Speaking through an official statement issued by the presidential office in Damascus, he emphasised that rebuilding national infrastructure, restoring basic services, and attracting private sector investment were now top priorities. His administration faces the immense challenge of reconstructing a country where more than a decade of conflict left nearly half the population displaced and critical industries in ruins.

Syria’s re-engagement with global financial institutions represents a delicate balancing act for regional and international actors. While Saudi Arabia and Qatar’s financial support signals renewed diplomatic engagement, it also reflects strategic calculations. Officials in Riyadh and Doha are believed to view a stabilised Syria as vital to broader Middle Eastern security and to limiting the influence of rival powers that gained ground during the conflict.

A Gulf-based diplomat with knowledge of the negotiations said that clearing Syria’s World Bank debt was seen as a “foundational gesture” aimed at laying the groundwork for deeper economic cooperation. “There is recognition that Syria’s stability benefits the entire region,” the diplomat explained. “But this assistance is not a blank cheque — it’s tied to expectations around governance, transparency, and economic reform.”

The World Bank, for its part, has been cautiously preparing for Syria’s potential re-entry into development programs. Bank officials underscored that while the clearing of arrears was a necessary procedural step, any future engagement would be closely conditioned on the government’s adherence to principles of accountability and inclusion. A spokesperson for the institution stated that assessment missions would be conducted to evaluate Syria’s institutional capacity and identify priority sectors for assistance, pending board approval.

Economic experts observing the development noted that while $15 million is a small figure compared to the scale of Syria’s reconstruction needs — estimated by some analysts to exceed $400 billion — the symbolic value of the Gulf states’ intervention is considerable. By assuming Syria’s financial obligations, Saudi Arabia and Qatar have effectively opened the door to broader international financial support, including potential aid from bilateral donors and regional development banks.

Syria’s financial rehabilitation comes amid evolving geopolitical dynamics in the Middle East, where Gulf nations have shown a willingness to recalibrate relationships and pursue pragmatic approaches to regional conflicts. Qatar, which once supported opposition groups during the Syrian civil war, has shifted its stance to focus on post-conflict recovery, while Saudi Arabia has sought to spearhead diplomatic normalisation efforts, including Syria’s readmission into the Arab League.

The economic picture within Syria remains dire. Inflation has soared, the Syrian pound continues to depreciate, and essential services such as electricity, healthcare, and education are struggling to function. The United Nations has warned of a worsening humanitarian situation unless economic conditions improve, estimating that over 14 million Syrians require some form of assistance.

President Al-Sharaa’s administration, meanwhile, has signalled a commitment to overhaul outdated regulatory frameworks, encourage foreign investment, and revive critical sectors such as agriculture, manufacturing, and tourism. In a televised address earlier this month, he pledged that Syria would embark on “an era of renewal,” focusing on job creation, infrastructure development, and restoring public trust in state institutions.

International observers caution that much will depend on the government’s ability to implement reforms credibly and transparently. Skepticism persists among some Western governments and humanitarian organisations over the prospects for genuine political and economic liberalisation. Nonetheless, the Gulf states’ financial backing and the World Bank’s procedural readiness mark a notable shift, offering Syria its first tangible pathway to re-entering the global financial system after years of isolation.

Dubai-based luxury real estate developer Omniyat Holdings has mandated a consortium of international and regional banks to arrange its inaugural US dollar-denominated green sukuk, marking its entry into the sustainable finance market. The issuance, structured as a three-year fixed-rate senior unsecured sukuk under Regulation S, is poised to attract global investors seeking Sharia-compliant green investment opportunities.

The appointed joint global coordinators for the transaction are ADCB, Citi, ENBD Capital, JP Morgan, Mashreq, and Standard Chartered. Supporting them as joint lead managers and bookrunners are Ajman Bank, Commercial Bank of Dubai, Dubai Islamic Bank, First Abu Dhabi Bank, Kamco Invest, RAKBANK, and Warba Bank. Investor calls are scheduled to commence on Thursday, setting the stage for the sukuk’s launch, subject to market conditions.

Omniyat, renowned for its high-profile developments such as The Opus in Dubai’s Business Bay—designed by the late Zaha Hadid—aims to leverage the proceeds from the green sukuk to finance or refinance projects that align with environmental sustainability criteria. This move aligns with the broader trend in the Gulf Cooperation Council region, where issuers are increasingly tapping into the green finance market to support environmentally friendly initiatives.

The UAE has emerged as a leader in green sukuk issuances, with activity in the sector doubling to $8.6 billion in the first half of 2024. This surge is attributed to a series of high-profile issuances by major financial institutions and corporations, reflecting the country’s commitment to sustainable development and its 2050 Net Zero Goals.

Omniyat’s entry into the green sukuk market follows similar moves by other prominent UAE entities. For instance, Abu Dhabi Islamic Bank successfully raised $500 million through a green sukuk offering, marking the world’s first US dollar-denominated green sukuk issued by a financial institution. The issuance was met with exceptional demand, attracting interest from over 100 global and regional investors, and was listed on the London Stock Exchange’s International Securities Market and Sustainable Bond Market.

Similarly, Majid Al Futtaim, a UAE-based developer and operator of shopping malls, has previously issued a $600 million green sukuk to finance a portfolio of green projects. The issuance, which was listed on Nasdaq Dubai, underscores the growing appetite for sustainable investment products in the region.

Centralised finance lending has contracted sharply, with the total loan book falling to $11.2 billion by the end of 2024—a 68% decline from its 2022 peak of $34.8 billion. This downturn underscores the profound impact of regulatory tightening, shifting investor sentiment, and evolving risk management practices within the financial sector.

The dramatic reduction in CeFi lending is attributed to a confluence of factors. Regulatory authorities have implemented stringent measures to mitigate systemic risks, compelling financial institutions to reassess their exposure to high-risk lending. These measures have included increased capital requirements and enhanced scrutiny of lending practices, particularly concerning unsecured and high-yield loans.

Non-banking financial companies , often referred to as shadow banks, have been significantly affected. Loan growth among NBFCs moderated to 6.5% in the first half of fiscal year 2024–25, a notable decrease from previous periods. This deceleration is particularly evident among upper-layer NBFCs, which predominantly engage in retail lending. The Reserve Bank of India’s Financial Stability Report highlights that the growth of bank borrowings in NBFCs’ liabilities declined from 26% to 17%, indicating a shift in funding dynamics.

In response to these challenges, NBFCs are diversifying their funding sources. There has been a marked increase in the issuance of non-convertible debentures and a growing reliance on foreign currency borrowings. However, this shift introduces new risks, particularly related to currency fluctuations, which could affect the financial stability of these institutions.

The regulatory landscape has also prompted financial institutions to enhance their risk assessment frameworks. Banks are increasingly evaluating the carbon footprint of their loan portfolios, aligning with global environmental, social, and governance standards. This trend reflects a broader commitment to sustainable lending practices and a recognition of the long-term risks associated with climate change.

Global oil prices have fallen to their lowest levels in over four years, driven by escalating trade tensions and fears of a global economic slowdown. Brent crude dropped by 3.79% to $60.44 per barrel, while West Texas Intermediate declined by 4.13% to $57.12, marking their lowest points since February 2021. This decline follows the United States’ implementation of 104% tariffs on Chinese imports, after Beijing maintained its 34% retaliatory tariffs on U.S. goods. The escalating tit-for-tat measures have dampened hopes for a swift resolution, raising concerns about a deepening global recession and diminishing energy demand.

Compounding the situation, the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries and its allies plan to increase output by 411,000 barrels per day in May, potentially leading to a supply surplus. Analysts warn that this move could further destabilize the market. Despite a slight easing from a 1.1 million-barrel decrease in U.S. crude inventories, overall sentiment remains bearish. Goldman Sachs forecasts further declines in oil prices through 2025 and 2026. Additionally, Russia’s ESPO Blend oil has, for the first time, dropped below the $60 Western price cap, underlining the global pressure on oil markets.

In Canada, oil and gas executives are adopting a cautious approach in response to the price slump. Doug Bartole, CEO of InPlay Oil, indicated that while immediate cutbacks in production or spending are not planned, sustained low prices, especially around $50 per barrel, could prompt strategic reassessments. InPlay recently completed a C$321 million acquisition of Alberta oil assets from Obsidian Energy, despite market uncertainties. Analysts from ATB Capital Markets have downgraded InPlay’s share target based on current low WTI price levels. Economist Peter Tertzakian noted that while major oil sands companies can sustain lower prices, smaller firms may need to adjust capital expenditures if the price slump continues. Meanwhile, Birchcliff Energy CEO Chris Carlsen highlighted a potential benefit for natural gas producers, as reduced oil drilling may decrease associated gas output, potentially tightening supply.

The sharp decline in oil prices poses significant challenges for Saudi Arabia’s ambitious Vision 2030 megaprojects, including the futuristic Neom city. Oil remains the backbone of the kingdom’s economy, despite efforts to diversify. With Brent crude recently falling to $62 a barrel and forecasts suggesting further declines due to global economic instability and increased OPEC+ output, the country faces a budget deficit and reduced oil-derived income. Saudi Aramco’s anticipated dividends have dropped significantly, compounding financial pressures. Analysts expect the government may scale back or delay lower-priority projects, focus on key investments like global events, or increase borrowing and taxation. Notably, plans for “The Line” have reportedly been reduced to a 1.5-mile stretch associated with the 2034 FIFA World Cup. Despite reassurances from Saudi officials, concerns persist that the ambitious Neom development, championed by Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, may need to be downsized unless oil revenues recover.

The U.S. administration’s tariff policies have been a significant factor in the market’s volatility. While some argue that the tariffs, impacting about 1% of the $28 trillion U.S. economy, are intended to shift global trade dynamics in favor of the United States and counter countries like China, others believe that the market’s reaction has been exaggerated. Despite the uproar, these tariffs would channel approximately $300 billion annually to the U.S. Treasury. Critics argue that the U.S., while the world’s largest importer, has a relatively low import-to-GDP ratio compared to other countries. They contend that China has more to lose in a trade war due to its export-reliant economy and employment structure. American public sentiment appears cautiously supportive of fair trade measures, especially against perceived Chinese industrial subsidies. Some suggest that markets should adopt a wait-and-see approach rather than panicking, likening the administration’s stance to the backlash faced by UK Prime Minister Liz Truss over her economic reform attempts, suggesting a resistance to market-driven pressure.

Falling oil prices, encouraged by policies aimed at reducing regulatory burdens, may bring lower gasoline costs but also discourage new oil production due to unprofitable pricing levels and economic uncertainty. Efforts to stimulate future energy production, such as expanding drilling access and reviving coal via executive order, are counterbalanced by cautious industry investment amidst global trade tensions. Additionally, March 2025 was the second-warmest on record globally, with Arctic sea ice hitting a near half-century low, continuing a concerning trend of climate anomalies. On the tech front, battery startup Bedrock Materials is shutting down due to competitiveness issues against cheaper lithium-ion technology from China. Meanwhile, Tesla alum Drew Baglino’s Heron Power is raising $50 million to develop advanced solid-state transformers, reflecting continued clean-tech investment. Furthermore, the Bezos Earth Fund and Global Methane Hub announced a $27.4 million initiative to identify and breed cattle and sheep that emit less methane, a step toward sustainable livestock farming. These developments reflect significant intersections between policy, environment, and innovation shaping global energy and climate landscapes.

The office segment, traditionally a significant recipient of PE funding, witnessed a substantial reduction in investments. In the first half of FY25, investments in office assets plummeted by 79%, contributing to an overall 4% decline in PE investments during this period. Shobhit Agarwal, Managing Director and CEO of ANAROCK Capital, noted that foreign investors, who predominantly drive office sector investments, have scaled back due to factors such as geopolitical tensions and elevated interest rates.

Conversely, the industrial and logistics sector emerged as a bright spot, capturing 67% of total PE investments in the first half of FY25. This surge was significantly bolstered by a landmark deal wherein Abu Dhabi Investment Authority and KKR invested USD 1.54 billion in Reliance Logistics and Warehouse Holdings’ assets across multiple locations. This transaction alone accounted for a substantial portion of the sector’s investment inflow during this period.

The residential segment also saw an uptick in PE interest, with its share rising to 17% in the first half of FY25, up from 8% in the same period the previous year. This increase reflects growing investor confidence in the residential market’s potential.

Despite the overall decline in PE investments, the average deal size has seen an upward trajectory. In the first nine months of FY25, the average deal size increased by 32.5%, reaching USD 117.3 million, compared to USD 88.5 million in the corresponding period of FY24. This rise underscores the impact of large-scale transactions on the market, with the top 10 deals comprising 93% of total PE transactions during this timeframe.

Foreign capital continues to play a dominant role in India’s real estate PE landscape, accounting for 87% of total investments in the first half of FY25. However, this represents a slight decrease from the previous fiscal year, where foreign investments constituted 76% of the total. The decline is indicative of the cautious approach adopted by foreign investors amid global economic challenges.