News related to
security

China is intensifying its efforts to import liquefied natural gas from Russia, despite the ongoing sanctions imposed by the United States and the European Union. As part of these efforts, China has begun developing a fleet of ships designed to transport the super-cooled fuel, with the aim of circumventing international sanctions that prevent direct shipments of Russian LNG to Western markets.

The growing need for energy security and a steady supply of LNG has driven China to explore alternative ways to obtain natural gas, as it faces increasing pressure from energy demand and geopolitical challenges. With European nations largely cutting ties with Russia due to the conflict in Ukraine, China sees an opportunity to secure more of Russia’s vast natural gas reserves. However, the US and EU sanctions, which prohibit companies from providing services and equipment that facilitate the transportation of Russian LNG, have posed significant barriers to the direct importation of Russian gas.

To sidestep these restrictions, China is reportedly building a “shadow fleet” of vessels—tanker ships capable of transporting LNG without being registered under the jurisdictions of Western countries. These ships are often equipped with modified technologies and reflagged to nations that do not enforce the same sanctions as Western powers. Experts suggest this new fleet could potentially enable China to bypass regulatory hurdles and enhance its access to Russia’s energy exports.

This development comes amidst growing concerns about energy supply in both Russia and China. For Russia, the loss of its traditional European export markets has accelerated the search for new buyers in Asia. China, with its vast and growing energy demands, has become the ideal partner for Russia, with both nations keen to deepen their trade relations in the energy sector.

In recent months, reports from various trade bodies and maritime sources have indicated that Chinese shipping companies have begun to work closely with Russian counterparts to facilitate these energy exchanges. According to analysts, these operations are being conducted with the support of intermediaries who play a critical role in enabling the shipment of Russian gas to China. These intermediary companies typically operate under the radar, helping to shield the true origins of the LNG shipments from scrutiny.

The expansion of this fleet raises important questions about the international regulatory landscape and the extent to which sanctions can be effectively enforced in an increasingly interconnected global economy. While Western powers have imposed sanctions on Russia’s energy exports, many analysts argue that their impact has been diluted by countries like China and India, who have continued to purchase Russian energy despite the restrictions.

The move to build a shadow fleet also highlights the growing divide in global energy politics. As Western nations look to reduce their dependency on Russian energy, China has emerged as a key player in filling the gap. With this increasing trade of Russian LNG to China, there are indications that both countries are fortifying their positions in the global energy market, positioning themselves as key energy suppliers to the global south.

China’s energy imports from Russia are also seen as a key component of the broader geopolitical shifts that have been underway in recent years. By continuing to build its energy relationship with Russia, China is further diversifying its sources of energy, ensuring that it has a reliable and growing supply of natural gas that is less susceptible to the fluctuations of the global market. This is especially important as China seeks to meet its ambitious energy and industrial goals in the coming decades.

The logistical complexities of importing LNG are considerable, and China’s efforts to expand its shadow fleet reflect the nation’s determination to secure a more consistent energy supply. These vessels, which are currently being constructed and modified, will be able to bypass many of the traditional channels through which Western powers exert control over Russian energy exports. This represents a significant shift in the global LNG market, with China positioning itself as a key recipient of Russian energy.

By Nantoo Banerjee It is difficult to grasp the fact that even 78 years after its independence, India, the world’s most populous country, continues to be heavily dependent on imported fertilizer to produce crops to feed its 1.46 billion-plus population. The prospect of a sudden fertiliser price surge ahead of its most important Rabi (winter) […]

The article Fertiliser Import Price Surge May Hit India’s Rabi Crop Output appeared first on Latest India news, analysis and reports on Newspack by India Press Agency).

Visa and Mastercard are reportedly nearing a resolution in a two-decade-long legal dispute with a group of merchants over the fees associated with their payment systems. Sources familiar with the ongoing negotiations indicate that both companies, along with the merchants involved, are working towards an agreement that could put an end to the protracted legal battle, which has caused significant tension in the payments industry.

The legal issue dates back to the early 2000s when merchants accused the payment giants of anti-competitive practices, specifically their practice of setting high interchange fees for card transactions. These fees, paid by merchants to card issuers, have been a point of contention for years, with many arguing that the pricing structures imposed by Visa and Mastercard were unfairly high and limited competition within the payments market.

This dispute first gained public attention when large retailers and other business associations banded together, alleging that the card networks were using their market dominance to maintain inflated fees. Over time, the case expanded to include a wide range of merchants, from small businesses to multinational corporations, who collectively argued that the financial burden of interchange fees was ultimately passed on to consumers in the form of higher prices.

Throughout the years, both Visa and Mastercard have faced legal challenges, and a series of class-action lawsuits have been filed. These lawsuits have not only focused on the fees themselves but also on the lack of transparency in how they were determined and enforced. Merchants claimed that the payment networks’ practices amounted to price-fixing, a violation of antitrust laws. The legal battle escalated over time, with both sides digging in their heels.

The talks have reportedly intensified in recent months, with both Visa and Mastercard keen to resolve the matter without further litigation. According to the sources, the settlement under discussion would likely result in a significant financial payout to merchants, though the exact amount remains undisclosed. The agreement could also include changes to the way interchange fees are structured, potentially leading to lower costs for businesses that accept card payments.

For Visa and Mastercard, the prospect of a settlement would bring an end to a costly and divisive legal fight. Both companies have defended their practices throughout the proceedings, maintaining that the fees they charge are justified by the value they provide in terms of security, convenience, and innovation in the payments ecosystem. However, they also face growing pressure from lawmakers, regulators, and consumers to address the issue of interchange fees, which have been a sticking point in the broader debate on financial services.

For merchants, the settlement represents a significant potential win. Many business owners, particularly in sectors like retail and hospitality, have long argued that interchange fees represent a hidden tax on their operations, undermining their ability to compete. Lowering these fees could provide financial relief, particularly for smaller businesses that often face the highest costs in the payment system.

If the settlement is reached, it could have a ripple effect across the payments industry, influencing how other payment processors and financial institutions structure their fees. Moreover, it could pave the way for further regulatory scrutiny of the broader payments ecosystem, with calls for greater transparency and fairness in the way card networks operate.

In addition to the financial terms, the settlement is also expected to address broader issues within the payments sector. Changes to the way interchange fees are communicated to merchants, improvements in fee structures, and possible new regulations could be part of any final agreement. These changes could not only benefit merchants but also lead to a more competitive environment in the payment processing industry.

By Nitya Chakraborty In Chinese media, lot of interest is focused on the future of the US sponsored security bloc QUAD and what will be India’s relations with it in the backdrop of US President Donald Trump’s strained relations with the Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi and the last August 30 summit of the Indian […]

The article China Sees Political Coldness In India’s Dealing With Coming QUAD Summit appeared first on Latest India news, analysis and reports on Newspack by India Press Agency).

By Nitya Chakraborty US President Donald Trump’s favourite grouping Quadrilateral Security Dialogue (QUAD) is in deep crisis due to the strain in India-US relations in 2025 covering both trade and political issues and also a dip in personal ties between Trump and the Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi over the role of the US President […]

The article Future Of Trump’s Favourite Grouping QUAD Is At Stake Due To India-US Schism appeared first on Latest India news, analysis and reports on Newspack by India Press Agency).

Abu Dhabi-headquartered AD Ports Group has reached a joint venture agreement with France’s CMA CGM Group to acquire a 20 per cent stake in the Latakia International Container Terminal in Syria for USD 22 million. The deal followed the ratification of a shareholders’ agreement signed in Abu Dhabi by Captain Mohamed Juma Al Shamisi, Managing Director & Group CEO of the AD Ports Group, and Rodolphe Saadé, Chairman & Chief Executive Officer of CMA CGM. The terminal handles over 95 per cent of Syria’s container traffic and is vital for the country’s agricultural export flows and industrial imports.

The new partnership builds on an existing franchise: CMA CGM has operated LICT since 2009 and in May this year signed a 30-year concession with Syrian authorities to expand and modernise the facility with a €230 million investment. Under this expansion plan the terminal’s capacity will scale from around 250,000 twenty-foot equivalent units to approximately 625,000 TEUs by the end of 2026. The AD Ports stake brings fresh funding, regional logistics know-how and establishes a feeder-service linkage via GFS expected to call Latakia in its emerging network.

Analysts note combining AD Ports’ digital-and-logistics platforms with CMA CGM’s terminal-operations experience offers a synergetic boost. Captain Al Shamisi described the deal as reinforcing AD Ports’ role as a “global enabler of trade, logistics and industry” and strengthening its international footprint; Saadé said it underscores CMA CGM’s commitment to the Eastern Mediterranean corridor. Yet risks remain: Syria’s infrastructure base was severely weakened by years of conflict, sanctions regimes remain in flux, and the geopolitical security climate in the Eastern Mediterranean remains volatile. In particular the coastal region around Latakia must contend with residual logistical bottlenecks and war-damaged hinterland links.

From a strategic viewpoint, the deal gives AD Ports exposure to an under-served Mediterranean gateway that has long been overshadowed by Cyprus, Turkey and Egypt. For CMA CGM it provides a partner that can bring capital, Gulf-region networks and feeder-service integration. It also aligns with Syria’s aim to attract foreign investment into its trade infrastructure under recent reforms, aiming to rehabilitate its war-impacted logistics chains and boost maritime connectivity. Governance observers point out that this investment marks one of the first substantial Gulf-region port-logistics ventures in Syria since the cessation of major international sanctions, signalling a potentially broader shift in regional trade flows.

Operationally, the agreement will focus on upgrading terminal infrastructure, digitising cargo-handling and container-tracking systems, enabling larger vessels by deepening docks and extending quays, and integrating feeder-shipping links. LICT’s current capacity constraints mean that the joint venture must invest quickly to meet anticipated growth in Syrian cargo volumes, especially agricultural exports and industrial imports. The container terminal’s status as the main node for land-locked regions within Syria gives it strategic significance beyond the coast: improved throughput at Latakia could ease pressure on border crossings and reduce logistics delays for inland cargo flows.

A fresh platform launched by the startup SolarLedger is aiming to reshape how clean-energy data is processed and verified by introducing what it describes as a “green energy operating system” that embeds robust security features and market interfaces. At the heart of the offering are distributed-ledger and Internet-of-Things tools designed to automate the generation, trading and auditing of solar and other renewable-energy flows. According to the company’s statements, the system incorporates cryptographic tools such as zero-knowledge proofs and multi-signature verification to bolster data authenticity and traceability.

SolarLedger’s solution addresses growing concerns in green-finance and energy markets about the reliability of datasets underpinning asset-backed claims, such as renewable-energy certificates or carbon credits. By running real-time tracking of generation, storage, trading and settlement, the platform aims to reduce friction in peer-to-peer energy transactions and enhance transparency for smaller producers who have lacked access to institutional channels. This comes at a moment when distributed energy generation is expanding rapidly but remains under-represented in traditional electricity markets.

From a market-participant perspective, SolarLedger’s architecture is being pitched as transformative. It enables solar modules and storage systems not only to supply power but also to act as tradeable units with embedded provenance metadata. Smart-contract modules match producers and consumers, while traceable certificates of origin claim to be issued as each kilowatt-hour is generated. The firm states that its system eliminates much of the manual reconciliation and trust-layer overhead that currently slows clean-energy transactions, thereby unlocking new income streams for distributed generators.

On the technical side, the platform’s use of zero-knowledge proofs is particularly noteworthy. ZKPs allow one party to prove a fact is true without revealing the underlying data. This is increasingly recognised in academic literature as a potent tool for privacy-preserving validation in decentralized systems. In SolarLedger’s case, the firm says it uses ZKPs to validate meter-data reports and audit logs without exposing granular user or asset-level details. Complementing this, the system applies multi-signature verification — requiring multiple authorised parties to validate transactions — to further enhance trust in each asset’s lifecycle.

Emerging trends in the broader energy-tech space amplify SolarLedger’s relevance. Analysts observe that decentralised energy systems—particularly rooftop solar, microgrids and battery storage—are growing faster than transmission-interconnection frameworks in many regions. Traditional centralised electricity markets were built at a time when generation was large-scale and top-down. By contrast, distributed-generation assets today face barriers to participation in wholesale or retail markets, often due to information asymmetry, latency in settlement, and limited trust among counterparties. SolarLedger aims to bridge that gap by enabling smaller producers to join trading ecosystems on more flexible and transparent terms.

However, important challenges remain across regulation, interoperability and scalability. While SolarLedger cites pilot testing and proof-of-concept deployments, wide-scale adoption will require alignment with local grid-code legislation, energy-market rules, and national certification schemes. Integration with existing utilities and regulatory frameworks may prove complex, particularly in jurisdictions where grid operations and energy trading are tightly regulated. Furthermore, the academic literature on ZKP implementation cautions that although ZKP offers strong privacy and integrity gains, the complexity and computational overhead can be non-trivial — especially when applied to high-frequency data environments.

Another key player to watch in this space is Powerledger, an Australian blockchain-energy-software company which has built peer-to-peer energy-trading platforms and environmental-commodity tracking solutions. Its experiences highlight the twin challenges of scaling and commercialising such platforms in multiple jurisdictions. SolarLedger will need to demonstrate not just technical readiness but also market-acceptance, cost-competitiveness and regulatory compliance if it is to capture a meaningful share of the decentralised-energy-market value chain.

Canada is set to introduce a comprehensive federal framework aimed at regulating fiat-backed stablecoins under its 2025 budget. The plan mandates issuers to maintain full asset reserves, enforce redemption policies, and deploy robust risk-management and data-security protocols.

The regulatory scheme will be overseen by the Bank of Canada under the existing Retail Payment Activities Act, with the BoC allocating CAD 10 million over two years beginning in the 2026-27 fiscal year for implementation. Administration thereafter is expected to cost around CAD 5 million annually, to be offset through regulated-issuer fees.

This approach aligns Canada with the global trend in digital-asset regulation. The United States passed its own stablecoin legislation in July, placing pressure on Canada to move with similar urgency. The international stablecoin market currently stands above USD 300 billion and is projected to reach USD 2 trillion by 2028.

Regulated issuers will face specific requirements: they must hold reserves sufficient to cover outstanding stablecoins, enable immediate redemption at par value, and adopt risk protocols covering operational, credit, and market exposures. Issuers also must protect consumers’ personal and financial data and support national-security safeguards. Entities already operating as payment-service providers may need to transition under the Retail Payment Activities Act if they issue “prescribed stablecoins”.

Industry reaction has been broadly positive. The Canada arm of Coinbase called the framework “a watershed moment” that will “change how Canadians interact with money and the internet”. Fintech firms such as Tetra Digital and Wealthsimple, which are developing Canadian-dollar stablecoin offerings, have welcomed clarity of regulation as unlocking innovation. Nonetheless, some market commentators caution that tighter regulation must avoid stifling fintech entrants or pushing innovation offshore.

Canada’s decision follows a growing regulatory impetus. The BoC had earlier urged federal and provincial authorities to coordinate efforts on stable-coin regulation and payment-system modernisation, highlighting that Canada’s payment infrastructure lagged that of other advanced economies.

The timing of the regulatory initiative is notable. While the budget itself does not specify the exact date when the legislation will be tabled, it signals a shift toward payment-ecosystem reform. The budget also signals expansion of the BoC’s oversight of payment-service firms and accelerated deployment of the Real-Time Rail payments system expected to launch in 2026.

Analysts see multiple drivers behind the move: protecting consumers from stable-coin issuer failure; preserving monetary sovereignty by keeping domestic transactions off unregulated foreign stablecoins; encouraging competition and innovation in the payments sector; and aligning with international regulatory frameworks as digital assets blur traditional banking boundaries.

Some key challenges lie ahead. Defining which tokens qualify as “stablecoins” under the framework, and carving the issuer view between payment-instrument regulation and securities regimes at the provincial level, remain open. Enforcement mechanisms, cross-border coordination, and transitional arrangements for existing issuers will also test regulators’ capacity.

Under the announced funding plan, the BoC will allocate CAD 10 million over the first two years to establish regulation of stablecoin issuance and oversight, beginning in the 2026-27 fiscal period. Ongoing annual oversight costs of CAD 5 million will be recouped via licensed-issuer fees. Regulators assert that the initiative will support faster, cheaper and safer payment flows for Canadians while reducing reliance on unregulated digital tokens.