News related to
security

Sharjah Publishing City Free Zone has been awarded the globally recognised “Great Place to Work” certification for the second year running, underscoring its commitment to cultivating a top-tier workplace. The accolade, granted by an independent authority with over three decades of experience in measuring workplace culture, reflects outstanding performance across key employee experience metrics.

Employees gave the organisation exceptionally high ratings, with 94 per cent satisfaction in workplace hospitality, 90 per cent approval of leadership behaviour, 87 per cent for engagement and 86 per cent in innovation. Equity and fairness also scored strongly—over 70 per cent in relevant categories. A remarkable 99 per cent of staff reported feeling physically safe at work and welcomed upon arrival, while 96 per cent noted unbiased, gender-neutral treatment and approachable management. These figures speak to a supportive environment where employees feel secure, valued and motivated.

Behind these high scores lies a deliberate strategy focused on trust-building, transparent leadership and collaborative culture. Through the Great Place to Work® Trust Model™, SPC’s approach places employees as the cornerstone of its service delivery model. The environment it fosters not only benefits staff morale but also translates into superior customer experience, reflected in prompt and efficient services.

The achievement is particularly notable given the scale of SPC’s operations. The free zone hosts more than 9,600 businesses spanning over 40 countries, including more than 1,500 publishers and investors, and is a vital hub for educational and cultural content creation. Its ecosystem supports not only publishing but also broader creative, technological and entrepreneurial sectors.

SPC’s origins date back to its launch in 2017 under the guidance of Dr Sheikh Sultan bin Muhammed Al Qasimi, Ruler of Sharjah, as the world’s first dedicated publishing free zone. From the outset, it was positioned to capitalise on Sharjah’s increasing appeal as a global cultural and knowledge-based economy, offering 100 per cent foreign ownership, full capital repatriation and a broad spectrum of licensing activities.

Since its establishment, SPC has continuously upgraded both its work environment and customer services. In May 2024, it introduced 24/7 operational support and guaranteed a three-business-day turnaround for bank account openings. It also pioneered an AI-enabled “instant licence” system in collaboration with Sharjah’s Investor Services Centre, delivering trade licences in under five minutes. These initiatives demonstrate its dedication to efficiency and tech-enabled service delivery.

The free zone’s appeal stretches well beyond the publishing community. Over 2,000 Indian-owned businesses operate in SPC, drawn by its strategic location and integrated support infrastructure. These enterprises benefit from a platform that promotes global expansion and cross-border reach. SPC has also diversified licensing options to include e‑commerce, cybersecurity, AI, biotech and robotics, reflecting its ambition to cater for a wide range of creative and technological ventures.

Yet SPC has not been without critique. Some business owners on public forums have expressed frustration over service quality and administrative delays during setup. One Reddit user described licences issued “once you get the hang of things” albeit noting initial frustrations, while another labelled the free zone as “incredibly frustrating to deal with” but acknowledged smooth operation post-launch. These mixed reviews highlight areas for SPC to improve consistency in customer experience and operational support.

Despite these occasional criticisms, SPC remains a top choice for entrepreneurs and SMEs. An MoU with Amazon UAE in August 2024 aims to aid free zone businesses in scaling digitally and accessing Amazon’s e‑commerce network. Additionally, partnerships with financial institutions like Mashreq Bank provide priority banking services and support to its licensees.

The second consecutive Great Place to Work certification confirms SPC’s rising profile within Sharjah’s broader economic ecosystem. It aligns with Sharjah’s strategy to diversify its economy through nurturing creative, cultural and knowledge-based industries. Leadership at SPC points to this workplace accolade as affirming its role in attracting and retaining talent, as well as driving innovation in service delivery.

U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission chair Paul Atkins has formally withdrawn several cryptocurrency-focused rule proposals initiated under former chair Gary Gensler, representing a decisive shift in regulatory strategy.

At the centre of the SEC’s action are two major proposals: amendments to Exchange Act Rule 3b‑16, which sought to classify decentralized finance protocols as securities exchanges, and the implementation of enhanced custody requirements under the Investment Advisers Act for client crypto assets. The withdrawal, confirmed on 13 June 2025, reflects a broader deregulatory drive under the current administration.

Rule 3b‑16 had been poised to expand the SEC’s definition of “exchange” to include systems bringing together buyers and sellers of securities via smart contracts and other DeFi mechanisms. The proposal would have subjected many decentralised platforms to full regulatory oversight, unsettling industry participants and drawing criticism from blockchain developers and legal experts. Many in the crypto sector argued the move would permanently conflate DeFi infrastructure with traditional securities exchanges, hampering innovation.

The custody rule aimed to require investment advisers to deposit all client crypto assets with “qualified custodians” such as banks or registered broker‑dealers. That would have effectively sidelined many crypto-native custodians that don’t meet these standards. Proponents cited the need for robust safeguards, while opponents warned the rule would force clients into a narrow pool of custodians and increase costs.

The SEC’s withdrawal announcement emphasised that it will not pursue finalisation of these proposals and may “consider new rulemaking in the future.” The reversals are part of a broader retreat from Gensler-era initiatives, including planned ESG reporting mandates and cybersecurity obligations. Acting chair Mark Uyeda had suspended both the DeFi exchange and custody rules in March, and this withdrawal gives that decision official effect.

Market reaction was swift. Coinbase’s chief legal officer, Paul Grewal, declared on X that the agency had scrapped “3b16, qualified custodian, and all other unfinished Gensler rule proposals.” Crypto platforms welcomed the rollback, viewing it as a reaffirmation of self‑custody and decentralised financial innovation.

Institutional stakeholders also voiced support. Brian Laverdure, Senior VP of Digital Assets and Innovation Policy at ICBA, noted the agency’s publication had “withdraws several NPRMs” including definition of “exchange” changes and safeguarding rules, sending confidence ripples through community banks and investment advisers.

The shift in posture follows President Donald Trump’s commitment to reducing regulatory burdens on markets. In tandem, SEC staff and FINRA dismantled a long-standing 2019 joint statement on broker‑dealer custody of digital asset securities on 15 May, paving the way for regulated intermediaries to offer crypto custody services under established rules.

The SEC’s deregulatory drive is echoed in recent comments from Uyeda, who in March announced the agency might scrap or significantly amend crypto custody rules introduced during the previous administration. He emphasised a pivot towards “effective and cost‑efficient regulations that respect the limits of our statutory authority”.

Critics caution that this pivot could expose clients to risks. While standards for DeFi governance, custodial integrity, and cybersecurity remain under voluntary frameworks, there are concerns that stripping formal oversight could open institutional and retail investors to vulnerabilities. Legal analysts predict renewed debate over the SEC’s authority to classify new financial structures as securities.

DeFi proponents, for their part, argue the withdrawal presents an opportunity. With regulatory certainty withdrawn, startups and developers may double down on innovation, integrating hybrid compliance models that rely on decentralised autonomy rather than central oversight. Meanwhile, traditional custodians and broker‑dealers are expected to enter the crypto space more aggressively, now freed from the obligation of specialist “qualified custodian” status.

Remaining questions include whether Congress will move to impose legislative frameworks on digital assets and whether the SEC will pursue fresh proposals under a different legal theory. Commissioner Hester Peirce has signalled support for further dialogue and interpretative guidance, reinforcing a more incremental, consultative regulatory model.

The SEC is now scheduled to hold stakeholder forums and public consultations in the coming months. Industry watchers are closely tracking these developments to assess whether the rollback represents a long-term deregulatory reorientation or a temporary reprieve preceding fresh oversight efforts.

Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth informed the Senate Appropriations Committee on 11 June 2025 that the United States and Qatar have not yet formalised any agreement transferring a Boeing 747‑8 jetliner gifted by the Qatari royal family for potential use as Air Force One. Lawmakers pressing for details were met with repeated deferrals, as Hegseth invoked security and confidentiality concerns.

Senators voiced concern over the lack of transparency surrounding the gift. Senator Jack Reed of Rhode Island demanded insight into contractual terms and timeframe for retrofitting the aircraft to meet presidential standards, only to be told such information was “not for public consumption”. The Pentagon has neither disclosed cost estimates nor identified a specific US contractor for the extensive upgrade work required, including secure communications, defensive capabilities and airworthiness certification.

Despite earlier assurances from Air Force Secretary Troy Meink that retrofitting expenses could remain under USD 400 million, Democrats remain sceptical. Senator Chris Murphy pointed out that past Air Force One modernisation efforts have encountered significant budget escalations, sometimes reaching billions, and questioned the wisdom of funding work on a foreign jet when replacement aircraft are already in production.

Republicans, including Senators Jim Risch and Roger Marshall, defended the deal, asserting that Qatar and the UAE are strong US allies and that the jet donation alleviates procurement delays with Boeing. Secretary Hegseth echoed this view, suggesting that accepting Qatar’s jet could temporarily ease reliance on delayed Boeing‑built VC‑25B aircraft, though he declined to specify projected completion dates or key benchmarks.

Ethical concerns persist across party lines. Opponents argue that accepting a luxury aircraft from a foreign government may trigger Foreign Emoluments Clause issues or at least generate the appearance of impropriety. Qatar, meanwhile, has maintained that the nature of the transaction is under review—possibly a lease or outright purchase rather than a gift—though final details remain unresolved.

The Boeing 747‑8 in question, approximately 13 years old, features lavish interiors and advanced technology, earning it the nickname “palace in the sky.” Converting it to a presidential transport requires secure communications suites, defensive countermeasures, and structural modifications—a process estimated to span years. While Pentagon officials suggest costs may be contained beneath USD 400 million, analysts warn that upgrades for classified systems and nuclear safety could push costs well above one billion dollars.

Beyond the technical and ethical dimensions, questions remain over how accepting Qatar’s jet might affect broader US defence priorities. Some argue that prioritising resources for a foreign-made interim aircraft could detract from funding the delayed VC‑25B programme, which is pivotal to modernising the presidential fleet.

At the same hearing, Hegseth also dismissed calls for transparency, stating that budgetary and negotiating processes must remain classified for national security. This response intensified criticism from Democratic senators, who claim taxpayers deserve clarity on military expenditures and foreign transfers of high-value assets.

Meanwhile, Senate Republicans rejected two resolutions aiming to pause arms sales to Qatar and the UAE, signalling ongoing bipartisan support for the Gulf states despite growing unease over Trump administration’s foreign dealings. Republicans emphasised the strategic importance of maintaining strong defence cooperation, downplaying concerns over the aircraft gift.

The debate is set to continue as the Air Force advances planning and preliminary feasibility studies. Key upcoming moments include formalisation of the memorandum of understanding, selection of retrofit contractors, and disclosure of cost and timeline projections. The outcome will test the administration’s balance between diplomatic expediency, financial responsibility, and institutional transparency.

Kyiv’s parliament has introduced draft Bill 13356, empowering the National Bank of Ukraine to incorporate virtual assets—primarily Bitcoin—into its official gold and foreign-exchange reserves. The legislation would not compel the central bank to adopt such assets, but merely grant it the legal framework to do so.

Lead author Yaroslav Zheleznyak, first deputy chair of the Rada’s Finance Committee, highlighted that the bank would retain full discretion over timing, volume, and methodology of any crypto acquisitions. He described the measure as a pivotal move to “integrate Ukraine into global financial innovations” and bolster macroeconomic resilience while catalysing the digital economy.

Ukraine currently holds approximately 46,351 BTC—valued at over $5 billion—though these holdings originate from asset seizures, donations, and fundraising during wartime, and remain under civil-servant control rather than central-bank custody. If passed, the law would permit the bank to transition some of those coins into officially recognised reserves.

The proposal mirrors a broader trend: several nations are charting similar initiatives. The United States launched a Strategic Bitcoin Reserve under an executive order issued on 6 March by former President Trump, consolidating government‑owned cryptos into a national asset. Pakistan, Brazil and the Czech Republic are exploring mechanisms to incorporate digital assets into sovereign financial systems. El Salvador, which adopted Bitcoin as legal tender in 2021, holds over 6,000 BTC, while Bhutan maintains mining‑powered reserves worth around $750 million.

Yet the move is not without detractors. Critics emphasise Bitcoin’s volatility, liquidity constraints and concentration within corporate entities like MicroStrategy, which undermine its suitability as a stable reserve asset. The Swiss National Bank’s governor, Martin Schlegel, reaffirmed this stance on 25 April in Bern, warning that crypto lacks the stability and liquidity required for central‑bank reserve portfolios. ECB President Christine Lagarde has echoed similar concerns, stating that digital assets do not meet the criteria for eurozone reserve holdings.

Proponents argue that strategic inclusion could buffer Ukraine against inflation and currency devaluation, offering rapid, secure transferability unmatched by physical assets. Zheleznyak’s Telegram statement emphasised that implementation would be fully at the central bank’s professional discretion.

Operationalising the proposal will require establishing robust legal and procedural frameworks: anti‑money‑laundering protocols, cybersecurity safeguards, digital custody infrastructure, and accounting mechanisms. Banking analysts suggest that careful integration and risk management will be essential to balance innovation with financial stability.

Ukraine’s draft arrives amid growing global debate on digital money. Central bank digital currencies are being piloted worldwide, such as Turkey’s digital lira, China’s e‑renminbi, and Nigeria’s e‑Naira. Meanwhile, debates continue over whether public‑sector balance sheets should venture into decentralised finance or maintain traditional gold‑forex portfolios.

As parliamentarians prepare to debate Bill 13356, attention will turn to amendments that might specify asset types, risk parameters, and accounting standards—or narrow discretionary power for the central bank. The legislation must also align with IMF frameworks and comply with anti‑money‑laundering regulations.

Donald Trump has declared on social media that the United States and China have finalised a trade agreement, pending formal sign-off from both himself and Chinese President Xi Jinping. The accord ensures China will supply rare earth minerals and magnets “up front” to the U.S., while the U.S. will honour its commitments, including allowing Chinese students to study at American universities. Trump also highlighted a tariff arrangement favouring the U.S., imposing a total of 55 per cent, against China’s 10 per cent.

Negotiators in London laid the groundwork for this framework during two days of discussions aimed at restoring the Geneva truce first reached in May, which had faltered amid export restrictions on critical minerals. U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick described the outcome as putting “meat on the bones” of the Geneva agreement by addressing China’s curbs on rare earths and magnets. Both governments intend to present the framework for approval by Trump and Xi.

China controls a significant share of the world’s rare earth minerals, essential for manufacturing electronics, electric vehicles and defence technologies. Export licences recently granted to Chinese firms meeting U.S. demand reinforce China’s commitment to the agreement. The shortage of these minerals had previously disrupted global supply chains and limited U.S. access to critical components.

Alongside rare earth supplies, the agreement addresses educational exchanges by reaffirming that Chinese students will continue to access American universities. Trump emphasised this pledge in his social media announcement. Although the U.S. has criticised visas for students in sensitive fields, the deal appears to restore earlier norms.

Trump presented the tariff structure as a win for American interests: 55 per cent U.S. tariffs versus 10 per cent Chinese tariffs. These adjustments mark a shift from the extreme tariff stances of earlier this year, which had peaked at triple-digit levels.

Stock markets responded cautiously to the news: global indices displayed measured optimism as investors awaited details and official approvals. Analysts warned that markets remain fragile, with movement dependent on implementation and trust between the two nations.

Beijing’s participation was led by Vice Premier He Lifeng and Commerce Minister Wang Wentao, who conveyed the deal as a balanced step toward reviving the Geneva pact. The U.S. delegation included Commerce Secretary Lutnick, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, and Trade Representative Jamieson Greer. President Trump and President Xi had previously spoken by telephone on 5 June, building momentum for these discussions.

Despite this progress, experts caution that deep-seated mistrust and unresolved disputes remain. Non‑tariff barriers, such as technology export restrictions and visa policies, continue to loom. Chinese officials emphasised the deal’s provisional nature, awaiting “balanced” steps by both sides.

Analyst Ian Bremmer of Eurasia Group observed that while restarting the Geneva truce is a step up from breakdown, achieving a durable U.S.-China trade relationship will require sustained engagement and policy alignment. The role of rare earths as leverage underscores China’s global strategic advantage.

President Trump signalled confidence that approval could occur swiftly: Lutnick suggested sign-off might happen within days, as early as Wednesday or Thursday, after which implementation could begin. However, both governments have set a firm deadline of 10 August to negotiate a broader accord, before tariffs revert to higher levels.

With economic growth at risk from disrupted supply chains and tense trade anomalies, both the White House and Beijing face pressure to deliver tangible results. The World Bank recently warned that heightened tariff uncertainty could drag down global growth to an estimated 2.3 per cent in 2025.

While the deal hasn’t resolved core security‑driven trade issues—such as semiconductor and aviation export controls—it marks a notable thaw in tensions. Trump labelled his relationship with Xi as “excellent”, while both leaders exchanged invitations for state visits, signalling a diplomatic openness that has been absent from U.S.-China relations.

Dubai master developer Emaar Properties has introduced VYOM, a digital resale platform designed to streamline the sale of Emaar homes through secure, transparent and user‑controlled processes. Available now to global users, the platform enables homeowners and investors to manage listings, upload images, set prices and handle inquiries—all within an integrated, intuitive interface.

Mohamed Ali Alabbar, Emaar’s founder, emphasised that VYOM reflects a shift towards autonomy, trust and speed in the property market. “VYOM is more than a platform—it’s a new way of thinking about property resale,” he said, adding that it places control firmly in the hands of customers. The move addresses persistent inefficiencies in traditional resale methods, including pricing opaqueness, communication delays and fragmented processes.

VYOM emerges as part of Emaar’s broader digital transformation strategy. The platform aims to reduce friction in resale transactions, allowing direct buyer‑seller interactions without intermediaries. For users, the result is a streamlined experience: creation of personalised listings, real‑time updates, and enhanced transparency across the transaction journey.

Analysts suggest the launch positions Emaar ahead in a market increasingly adopting digital property solutions. Industry commentary notes that VYOM could prompt competitors—such as Damac Properties—to roll out similar digital resale or even rental platforms. One real estate expert reflected, “With Damac launching its e‑commerce property site, a trend is underway”—a transformation likely driven by rising online demand.

Emaar views VYOM as the first stage of a phased rollout. Future enhancements include integrated rental management and expanded analytics tools, offering marketing insights and valuation support to users. The initial launch focuses on resale, but the roadmap points to a full‑cycle platform guiding owners from purchase through resale and rental.

Market conditions in Dubai reinforce the appeal of digital platforms. Transaction volumes remain buoyant, and buyers are increasingly seeking end‑to‑end online clarity. Traditional resale has been hampered by agents’ commissions and uneven quality, often leaving sellers and buyers without real‑time updates or direct communication. VYOM seeks to bridge these gaps.

Emaar’s track record lends weight to this evolution. The company has been steadily digitising its portfolio, incorporating virtual tours, property management apps and smart home integrations in key UAE developments. VYOM aligns with these investments, reinforcing Emaar’s image as a tech‑forward developer.

Technology infrastructure behind VYOM is built on robust security and data‑protection standards, ensuring user authenticity, encrypted communications, and verified listings. This digital-first model is expected to reduce instances of fraud and misinformation that sometimes plague secondary property markets.

Investor sentiment appears optimistic. Although Emaar has not disclosed specific growth targets, experts believe VYOM could significantly boost customer retention and retention rates for repeat domestic and overseas investors. A senior property economist commented that such platforms “elevate resale liquidity and deepen buyer confidence in the Emaar brand”.

The Dubai Land Department, while not officially commenting, has previously expressed support for digitisation in property services and title registration. Platforms like VYOM may dovetail with government efforts to digitalise real estate transactions across the emirate, including escrow reforms and blockchain‑enabled land registry trials.

Homeowners who have previewed VYOM report an improved experience. One early user noted that the ability to revise prices instantly and manage viewings through the platform eliminated delays often caused by agent coordination. The user highlighted how features such as buyer messaging templates helped standardise and speed up negotiations, while integrated market insights assisted pricing strategies.

Emaar has also invested in training programmes for sales teams and customer‑care staff to ensure consistent support for VYOM users. This back‑end readiness suggests the platform will do more than merely exist online; it will be backed by human expertise and service continuity.

Financial analysts underscore the commercial implications. VYOM can retain undisclosed resale transaction fees and promote secondary market activity within Emaar’s ecosystem. Over time, data harvested from user behaviour could feed predictive tools, generating new revenue through ancillary services such as refinancing, renovation or interior design partnerships tied to resale activity.

While VYOM’s earliest phase targets the resale of Emaar properties—off‑plan and completed—broader implications may follow. Market watchers consider the platform a bellwether for digital transformation in real‑estate heavyweights, signalling a shift towards owner-empowered brokerage and vertical integration.

U.S. law enforcement has seized approximately 145 darknet and clearnet domains, along with cryptocurrency holdings linked to BidenCash, a notorious carding marketplace that facilitated the distribution of stolen credit card data and personal information. Since its inception in March 2022, the platform served over 117,000 users and trafficked more than 15 million payment card records, reportedly generating at least $17 million in illicit revenue.

BidenCash gained traction by periodically publishing stolen data sets—for example, offering 3.3 million credit card records free of charge between October 2022 and February 2023—as a marketing tactic to lure new buyers. These leaks included full card numbers, expiry dates, CVV codes, account holder names, addresses, email IDs and phone numbers. Beyond carding, the platform also traded compromised credentials which could be used for unauthorised computer access.

By court order, U.S. authorities have seized cryptocurrency wallets used by BidenCash to collect illicit proceeds. On‑chain intelligence from Arkham Intelligence indicates that around $43,000 in USDT was transferred to wallets designated as “Seized Funds”, although the total seizure remains undisclosed.

Visitors to the seized domains are now automatically redirected to servers controlled by U.S. law enforcement and are greeted with official seizure banners bearing logos of the Department of Justice, FBI, U.S. Secret Service and involved international partners.

The dismantling of BidenCash resulted from a joint operation involving the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Eastern District of Virginia, the Secret Service, the FBI and international partners including the Dutch National High Tech Crime Unit, the Shadowserver Foundation and Searchlight Cyber. While no arrests have been confirmed publicly, the takedown highlights expanded cooperation between U.S. and European agencies.

Cybersecurity analysts warn that some traces of BidenCash remain active. As of early June, researchers such as Vmprotect identified at least seven live domains tied to the marketplace, illustrating the inherent challenges in fully eradicating darknet infrastructure.

Experts highlight that even expired credit cards and outdated personal data can fuel phishing schemes, identity theft and account takeovers, underscoring the enduring risks for victims.

The crackdown on BidenCash forms part of a broader escalation by global law enforcement in their fight against cybercrime malign platforms. Recent operations have targeted malware-as-a-service networks, counter‑antivirus services and other darknet commerce sites. Yet analysts caution that such efforts often spark rapid migration of criminal activity to new domains and platforms.

Investigators are now focusing on tracing the individuals behind the BidenCash operation and pursuing further legal actions to freeze remaining assets. Analysts emphasise that the success of this takedown will depend on follow‑through investigations and the dismantling of successor networks.