News related to
trading

The rupee edged towards a sharp low as the central bank escalated its defence of the currency amid growing external headwinds. The domestic currency traded around 88.80 to the U. S. dollar, nearing its record low despite official efforts to stem the slide.

The Reserve Bank of India expanded its short-dollar forward positions by about US$6 billion in September, bringing the total to roughly US$59.4 billion, signalling increased dollar sales to defend the rupee.
The rupee had already recorded five straight months of decline before stabilising briefly in October, only to come under renewed pressure. Analysts point to surging gold imports, foreign-portfolio investor withdrawals and uncertainty around U. S. tariffs as key drivers of dollar outflows.

Market participants note that the rupee’s ability to hold above the 88.80 mark depends heavily on the central bank’s resolve. One currency strategist at the Australia and New Zealand Banking Group remarked that the central bank may not allow a significant breach of the 89-per-dollar level unless India’s economic fundamentals deteriorate further.

The rupee’s slide contrasts with other emerging-Asian peers, most of which posted gains of over 3 per cent this year while India’s currency was down about 3.6 per cent. Importer demand for dollars and robust non-deliverable-forward flows remain persistent drags. The central bank made small daily interventions via state-run banks, but these were smaller in scale than the large dollar sales seen in the prior month.

In one high-impact intervention, the Reserve Bank of India sold between US$3 billion to US$5 billion across spot and offshore markets, according to trade-desk estimates. That move pushed the rupee up by nearly 1 per cent on the day, its largest single-day gain in four months. The central bank has declined to comment publicly on the precise quantum of intervention.

The central bank is also placing a premium on managing volatility. Despite the dollar’s global strength and broader weakness in Asian currencies, the rupee has been constrained to a narrow trading band around the 88.80 level. Its ten-day realised volatility has fallen beneath 2 per cent and implied volatilities through one month are near their yearly lows. Some market participants caution that this subdued volatility could undermine hedging activity and leave firms vulnerable if a shock hits.

The rupee’s vulnerability arises in part because the U. S. dollar remains elevated, and the Federal Reserve has signalled that it does not expect to cut interest rates as soon as markets hoped, strengthening the greenback and reducing relief for the rupee. At the same time, India’s trade position remains under pressure as high gold-import volumes and elevated oil prices increase dollar demand.

Against this backdrop, India’s sovereign-bond market is showing signs of life. Foreign investors have ramped up purchases of long-dated government debt following the central bank’s display of defensive resolve. Some analysts suggest that migration back into Indian bonds reflects renewed confidence in rupee-denominated assets. Yet this hope is tempered by the possibility that tighter liquidity—stemming in part from currency-market interventions—could weigh on bond markets and corporate funding costs.

A memecoin tied to a golden statue of Changpeng Zhao, founder of Binance, erected near the U. S. Capitol, plunged roughly 99 per cent after he publicly disowned it. The token, dubbed “CZStatue”, surged by more than 27,000 per cent in a single day before crashing from around 17.5 cents to near zero. It recorded approximately $1.2 billion in trading volume during its brief high—raising red flags around market manipulation and the underlying token contract.

Zhao labelled the project a “quick-buck” scheme and urged his followers not to buy the token, writing: “While I want to appreciate the gesture, the fact that there is a meme coin associated with this means the creator probably just wanted to make a quick buck off an interaction from me. This is something I don’t appreciate. Don’t buy the meme.” Analysts say this public warning triggered a swift loss of confidence among retail investors.

Blockchain data reveals the token contract restricted selling only to the creator, effectively creating a honeypot scenario in which buyers were unable to exit their positions. More than 1,100 wallets remain stuck holding near-worthless tokens, prompting concerns of investor harm and potential regulatory scrutiny. One observer remarked that the episode bore the hallmarks of a “pump and dump” disguised as a fan-driven initiative.

The statue, reportedly a four-metre high golden representation of Zhao making his signature “ignore FUD” gesture, was commissioned by his fan community with plans to gift it to Zhao or auction it for his charity project. The token’s launch capitalised on the statue event, tying the hype to Zhao’s personal brand and the physical monument’s publicity. Zhao issued a social-media statement clarifying he had neither authorised the token nor requested the statue, and reaffirmed his disapproval of profit-driven uses of his likeness.

Cryptocurrency analysts warn that this incident spotlights broader vulnerabilities in the memecoin ecosystem: a blend of social-media hype, celebrity association and unregulated token mechanics. One metrics firm noted that more than 80 per cent of new memecoins in 2025 displayed non-standard contract features that favour insiders and restrict liquidity for retail investors. Regulators in several jurisdictions are stepping up monitoring of such tokens, given concerns around investor protection and potential financial losses.

Ethereum’s trajectory is showing signs of strengthening as institutional demand, staking growth and protocol upgrades converge to position the network for a possible lead in the upcoming crypto cycle. The asset has been trading in a holding pattern around the $4,000–$4,300 range while market watchers debate whether this consolidation presages a breakout or a renewed test of support. According to exchange-data and on-chain indicators, Ethereum’s fundamentals are increasingly robust as it faces critical technical levels.

Institutional flows into Ethereum-related products have doubled since early 2025, with fund holdings reaching an estimated 6.5 million ETH and staking totals climbing to a record near 36.1 million. These developments reflect rising confidence in the network’s long-term value proposition as more traditional investors enter the space. On-chain records show that major whale wallets and “smart money” participants are accumulating, while staking reduces circulating supply and enhances scarcity dynamics.

Ethereum’s dominance in the decentralised finance and stable-coin settlement sectors amplifies that structural momentum. The network remains the foundational layer for smart-contract use-cases, layer-2 roll-ups and tokenised assets, lending greater weight to its ecosystem compared with more speculative cryptocurrencies. Developer-activity metrics place Ethereum ahead in creating new builds, deploying upgrades and supporting applications, reinforcing its role as a critical infrastructure asset rather than simply a trading vehicle.

On the technical front, key resistance near $4,250–$4,300 has become a focal point for analysts. A sustained breakout beyond that zone could unlock targets in the $5,000–$6,000 range and potentially much higher over the next year or two. Conversely, failure to clear that barrier could invite a re-test of support zones around $3,900–$4,000, a scenario flagged by bearish analysts. Macro-conditions such as global interest-rate policy, liquidity flows and risk-appetite remain wild cards, keeping short-term momentum fragile even as the long-term case strengthens.

Competition from alternative layer-1 blockchains and regulatory uncertainties remain headwinds. While Ethereum remains the ecosystem leader, other chains are gaining traction with lower fees and faster speeds; the extent to which Ethereum preserves its dominance will depend on its ability to scale and manage cost pressures. Moreover, regulatory scrutiny of crypto assets and staking vehicles may alter the institutional adoption timeline, requiring cautious interpretation of bullish narratives.

Emerging upgrades to the network architecture provide a catalytic backdrop. The so-called “Fusaka” upgrade, scheduled for late 2025, aims to deliver enhancements to sharding and data-availability that should improve throughput and reduce fees. These technical improvements may lower entry barriers for decentralised-applications and stimulate further ecosystem growth, thereby reinforcing Ethereum’s value proposition. At the same time, staking yields continue to incentivise long-term holders and reduce the liquid supply, offering a structural support mechanism for price.

By K Raveendran New Delhi appears to be recalibrating its crude-oil sourcing strategy under mounting pressure from Washington, signalling what may be a strategic shift away from Moscow in favour of deeper ties with the United States. Over the past few months, Indian refiners, including the major private player Reliance Industries, have ceased or paused […]

The article India’s Energy Pivot Under Donald Trump’s Tariff Pressure appeared first on Latest India news, analysis and reports on Newspack by India Press Agency).

The cryptocurrency exchange WazirX will resume trading from 24 October, offering zero-trading-fees for a 30-day window as it restarts operations in phases through 27 October, according to the company’s announcement. The move follows regulatory and judicial approval of its restructuring scheme, signalling a fresh push to restore market presence and user confidence.

The phased rollout is structured across four days beginning 24 October, with around 25 per cent of listed tokens becoming tradeable each day until full functionality is reached by 27 October. The USDT markets will be enabled first, followed by INR trading pairs as part of the gradual reactivation. Trading will commence on each live token at 10:00 a. m. IST, with order-matching set to begin at 5:00 p. m. IST. The company emphasises that the fee-free period will be assessed for extension depending on user engagement and stability of the restart.

The zero-fee offer is designed to attract traders back to the platform and rebuild liquidity, at a time when trust in crypto exchanges remains fragile. WazirX management states that this incentive, coupled with a careful phased launch, is intended to “restore liquidity safely, confirm technical stability, and ensure a gradual and reliable return to normal trading across all market pairs.”

The relaunch arrives after the Singapore High Court sanctioned the restructuring scheme of WazirX’s parent entity, clearing a major regulatory hurdle. The process involved creditor-votes and considerable restructuring oversight, reflecting the seriousness of the platform’s operational freeze. The court approval is expected to pave the way for potentially unlocking user funds that had remained frozen since the suspension.

The exchange’s suspension followed a major cybersecurity incident in July 2024, when approximately US$230 million was reportedly lost in one of the country’s largest crypto-hacks. The outage left the platform offline for over a year and a half, creating uncertainty for users and creditors. The company signals that its collaboration with a third-party custody provider is intended to strengthen asset security, responding to one of the principal criticisms that emerged from the hack.

Analysts say the relaunch is significant for India’s broader crypto ecosystem, which has witnessed growing regulatory scrutiny and pressure for tighter security and transparency standards. The move by WazirX could act as a bellwether for other exchanges, in terms of operational restoration and user-trust rebuilding efforts. However, the stakes remain high: many users still await clarity on withdrawals, disputing the timeline and adequacy of asset recovery efforts.

While the trading disruption is over, questions persist about how quickly WazirX can rebuild liquidity across its markets, re-list tokens that were delisted or migrated during the shutdown, and reassure the user-base that past vulnerabilities have been addressed. Some tokens have already been delisted or swapped in line with the exchange’s due-diligence review, further complicating the relaunch.

China’s securities regulator has rolled out a sweeping reform package designed to simplify access for overseas institutional investors and bolster long-term capital flows into its stock and bond markets. The China Securities Regulatory Commission announced that it will streamline the existing regime for the so-called qualified foreign investor framework, including loosening qualification thresholds, expanding investment scope and reducing administrative friction.

At a policy forum in Beijing, CSRC Chairman Wu Qing stated that the reforms aim to make China’s capital markets “more inclusive, adaptable and globally competitive”. He said the regulator plans to introduce a shelf-based refinancing mechanism and simplify filing procedures for overseas listings, aligning with the broader effort to diversify asset allocations amid global uncertainty.

The reforms are anchored on three pillars: easing eligibility for overseas institutional investors, enhancing operational flexibility for capital flows and broadening the range of permissible investments. Legal-and-regulatory briefings indicate that registration channels will be modernised; for example, in the revised framework for the earlier QFII/RQFII regime, a single renminbi account may now serve both securities and derivatives trading and repatriation of returns is simplified.

The timing of the reforms signals China’s intent to rebuild investor confidence amid a decelerating economy and mounting international competition for capital. Analysts note that the removal of quotas in earlier iterations of the programme set the stage for this deeper opening. Foreign asset-managers are expected to interpret this as a signal that Beijing is actively courting long-term commitments, rather than purely speculative flows.

From the perspective of global investors, these changes may unlock previously inaccessible segments of China’s markets. The A-share universe on the Shanghai Stock Exchange and Shenzhen Stock Exchange has grown substantially, and the relaxations open the door to a wider number of institutions, countries and asset classes than in the past. Strategically, this aligns with China’s dual-track agenda of promoting internal consumption while also continuing to integrate with global finance.

Nevertheless, the loosening of rules carries risks and constraints. Although administrative barriers are being reduced, foreign institutions must still satisfy substantive criteria—including governance standards, compliance records and suitability for RMB-denominated investment. The commercial and geopolitical environment remains complex, and international concerns around transparency, data security and regulatory predictability persist. Moreover, while quotas may be reduced or removed, factors such as currency volatility, capital controls and domestic market sentiment will continue to influence investor decisions.

Market participants appear cautiously optimistic. A number of global asset-managers have publicly stated that they will monitor how implementation unfolds and whether domestic on-shore brokers and custodians adapt swiftly to the new rules. Some expect the real test to come when overseas institutions begin deploying larger mandates into the Chinese on-shore market and engaging in longer-term allocations rather than short-term trading.

From the government’s perspective, the drive to attract long-term capital is part of a broader reform push. China is not only seeking external capital but also attempting to deepen its domestic investor base, scale up passive and index-based investment, and reduce reliance on short-term speculative flows. The regulatory strategy suggests that policymakers believe structural openness will enhance market resilience and support sustainable growth.

Citigroup Inc. and Coinbase Global Inc. have announced a collaboration to expand digital-asset payment services for the bank’s corporate clients, signalling a deeper institutional embrace of blockchain-based money transfers. The partnership will first focus on facilitating conversions between fiat currencies and digital assets, including stablecoins, and improving access to on- and off-ramps for firms that move large volumes of funds.

The deal between Citi and Coinbase addresses a prominent pain point in global payments: the cost, time and complexity of moving funds across borders or between fiat and crypto systems. Under the agreement, the participants will work on streamlining pay-ins and pay-outs for institutional clients, simplifying the flow between traditional bank accounts and Coinbase’s digital-asset platform.

“With more than 300 payment-clearing networks across 94 markets globally, we see collaborating with Coinbase as a natural extension of our ‘network of networks’ approach,” said Debopama Sen, Citi’s head of payments and services. Brian Foster, global head of crypto-as-a-service at Coinbase, added that the collaboration “reflects our commitment to building the infrastructure needed for the next generation of financial services.”

Analysts view the move as part of a broader trend in which leading financial institutions are shifting from cautious observation of digital assets to actively integrating crypto and stable-coin infrastructure. Citi had already signalled interest earlier this year in issuing its own stablecoin and providing custody services for crypto assets backing investment funds.

Stablecoins—cryptocurrencies pegged to fiat currencies—currently serve mostly trading and settlement within crypto markets. The new collaboration suggests an ambition to extend their use into cross-border payments, treasury operations and institutional settlements. In this case, the plan explicitly includes exploring mechanisms to directly link fiat balances to on-chain stable-coin payouts for corporate clients.

While the partnership presents opportunity, it also raises regulatory and operational challenges. Financial regulators have increased scrutiny of stable-coin issuance, backing reserves and the potential risks to payments stability. Traditional banks entering the crypto space must manage compliance, money-laundering controls and cyber security in new systems. For instance, a consortium of ten major banks—including Citi—are together exploring stable-coin issuance tied to G7 currencies, with regulatory oversight a key consideration.

From an operational standpoint, integrating digital-asset infrastructure into a global bank’s existing payments network is complex. Citi’s model involves multiple clearing networks and real-time settlement expectations; adding 24/7 on-chain rails demands robust coordination, governance and risk management frameworks. The collaboration acknowledges this by focusing first on institutional clients and later expanding to broader corporate use.

For Coinbase, this partnership enhances its positioning as a trusted infrastructure provider for institutions. The firm has made several moves to support institutional adoption, including acquiring technology to expand capital markets presence and forming strategies around tokenised credit products. By joining forces with a major bank like Citi, Coinbase gains access to a wide international payments network and the bridge between traditional finance and digital assets.

Market reaction has been positive; following the announcement, Coinbase’s shares rose, reflecting investor appetite for digital-asset infrastructure deals with legacy banks. For corporate clients of Citi, the collaboration means access to a potentially faster, lower-cost payment model that combines fiat and crypto rails and the possibility of 24/7 global transfers.

In examining trends, the deal fits into a pattern where banks are no longer sidelined observers of cryptocurrency innovation but active participants. As one executive at Citi observed, the financial-services landscape is changing fast, and institutional demand for real-time, border-less payments is driving innovation. That said, the extent and pace of adoption will depend on regulatory clarity, technological readiness and client acceptance.

By Nantoo Banerjee If global oil giant BP plc’s ‘Energy Outlook 2025’ proves to be true, India will be a global leader in energy consumption, outpacing all other countries by 2050. The country will account for 12 percent of the global demand, up from seven percent from 2023, according to BP’s chief economist Spencer Dale. […]

The article India Is At The Heart Of Driving The Global Energy Process appeared first on Latest India news, analysis and reports on Newspack by India Press Agency).

India is positioning itself as a global food supplier using Dubai as the logistical gateway, according to statements made by Chief Minister N. Chandrababu Naidu of Andhra Pradesh during his visit to the UAE. He declared that India’s strengths in agriculture, horticulture, aquaculture and logistics will enable the country to serve “the global community” through Dubai’s market access.

Naidu spoke of the UAE city’s strategic connectivity and global reach as ideal for scaling Indian-food exports. He noted that the Andhra Pradesh government is aiming to reduce logistics costs by integrating inland waterways, railways, road and seaports, and by spending around 14 per cent of the state’s GDP on logistics infrastructure as part of the drive to increase efficiency. His role as chief minister of Andhra Pradesh places him at the centre of an ambitious push to offer the state as a manufacturing and supply-chain hub with Indian agriculture at its core.

The announcement comes amid a broader investment road-show in which Naidu met with senior policymakers and business leaders in the UAE to discuss partnerships across multiple sectors, including food processing, green energy, AI and infrastructure. During a dialogue in Dubai the chief minister stated that India will supply food to the global community through Dubai as a hub, adding that he met ministers, family-business leaders and airlines executives during the visit. He praised the Indian diaspora for their contributions and flagged the state’s goal of making the new capital Amaravati a “green and blue city” built around water, greenery and advanced infrastructure.

Andhra Pradesh’s food-processing ambitions are a central plank of the strategy. The state government has invited investment from UAE food-conglomerates to scale cocoa cultivation, chocolate manufacturing, aquaculture and related logistics. The Chinese food-industry trend of “value-added exports” is echoed by India’s attempt to move beyond raw agricultural exports towards packaged, processed and high-logistics-integrated supply chains.

From a trade perspective, positioning Dubai as a re-export hub can offer Indian producers quicker access to Middle East, African and European markets. Dubai’s status as a global logistics and trading hub gives India the opportunity to piggy-back on existing infrastructure and reach. It also offers investors assurances of regulatory, financial and physical connectivity.

However, a number of challenges stand in the way. India already faces structural issues in agriculture: fragmented landholdings, variable productivity, post-harvest losses, and high domestic logistics costs. While Naidu cites a logistics cost of about 14 per cent of GDP for Andhra Pradesh, the national average remains higher and such a figure implies major optimisation ahead. The use of Dubai as a hub also raises questions of tariff regimes, transit duties, warehousing handling cost and competition from other international producers using the Gulf as re-export platforms.

Critics also point to the risk of over-promising on export capacity. India’s agriculture export ratio remains modest relative to the size of its production, and moving up the value chain into globally competitive processed foods will require investment in cold-chain infrastructure, quality standards and market-specific certifications. The reliance on a single state’s announcement may also raise concerns about federal coordination and falling short of expectations if broader national agricultural reforms lag.

   By K Raveendran   The market seems to have already done its arithmetic on the new US sanctions on two major Russian oil companies, Rosneft PJSC and Lukoil, gauging the immediate and medium-term consequences for energy supply lines stretching from Moscow to Mumbai. In a matter of hours, crude prices spiked, reflecting not just […]

The article Latest Trump Sanction On Russian Oil Companies Gives Escape Route To India appeared first on Latest India news, analysis and reports on Newspack by India Press Agency).

Global oil prices climbed sharply following new sanctions targeting Russia’s major producers, underscoring how geopolitical risk is once again reshaping the energy sector. The United States moved to impose measures against Rosneft and Lukoil, companies that together account for roughly half of Russia’s oil production. The measures froze U. S. assets of the companies, barred American business dealings and threatened secondary penalties for third-party entities dealing with them.

The immediate market reaction was decisive. Brent crude rose by about 5.7 per cent after the announcement, while U. S. futures recorded their most significant one-day jump in over four months. Supply concerns and uncertainty around the disruption of Russian flows have added a new premium to oil prices. Some analysts describe this as the return of the “geopolitical risk premium” that had subsided earlier this year.

Key dynamics are emerging in the global energy landscape. One of them is the pressure on refineries in China and India that have heavily relied on Russian crude. With sanctions threatening secondary penalties, buyers are reconsidering their linkages. The ramifications extend beyond immediate flows: Russia’s ability to route crude via its so-called ‘shadow fleet’ of tankers and opaque trading chains may be challenged further, complicating its export capacity.

From the Russian side, President Vladimir Putin described the U. S. move as “unfriendly” and warned it could backfire by pushing up global oil costs. However, Moscow also signalled that production would continue, and previous sanctions have not immediately led to a collapse in output, suggesting resilience and adaptation persist in the Russian energy sector.

For the buyer nations, the calculus is shifting. Indian and Chinese refineries, which have depended on discounted Russian grades, now face the risk of being cut off from Western-dollar financing, insurance and shipping links if they flout U. S. rules. The potential loss of Russian supply at discount could create a scramble for alternative sources. Meanwhile, Russia may turn more aggressively towards friendly states or deepen barter trade, but such shifts would likely come with higher costs and logistical complexity. Analysts argue that the global spare capacity outside OPEC is already thin, so any reduction in Russian supply could tighten the market further.

In financial markets the impact is tangible. Energy stocks in Europe rose alongside oil prices, while Russian stock indices registered losses on the back of sanction pressure. Firms in the Asia-Pacific region with exposure to Russian crude may face heightened risk premiums or supply disruptions. The confluence of sanctions and market reactions underscores how inter-linked energy flows, geopolitics and financial exposure have become.

On the structural front, situation highlights the ongoing challenge of sanction enforcement. The U. S. Treasury and allied agencies are increasingly focusing not just on Russia’s producers but the broader ecosystem: shipping, insurance, finance. The effectiveness of these measures depends upon the willingness of non-U. S. players to comply and the ability of Russia to create work-arounds through alternative trade routes. The efficiency of existing infrastructure, the cost of shipping to farther markets, and the reliability of insurance all factor into how quickly Russian production or exports may come under strain.

Mumbai-based crypto exchange WazirX has enabled both Indian-rupee and cryptocurrency deposits as it moves toward resuming full trading and withdrawal services, signalling a critical recovery phase after its high-profile $230-million hack. The platform will initiate trading on 24 October 2025, launching with zero trading fees across all pairs for at least 30 days, and is rolling out withdrawals gradually.

WazirX’s comeback is anchored on a restructuring plan approved by the Singapore High Court for its parent company Zanmai Labs Private Limited, which had been navigating creditor claims and asset recovery since the breach. The company has partnered with US-based custodian BitGo to manage digital-asset wallets and bolster security with insured, institutional-grade custody solutions.

Operating under a phased restart, WazirX will first enable crypto-to-crypto markets and the USDT/INR pair from 24 October, with other INR pairs added later. Deposits are active now; withdrawals will follow in stages. Users who opted in to the restructuring will receive so-called “Recovery Tokens” within ten business days, representing claims on illiquid or frozen assets.

This relaunch occurs after the July 2024 hack — attributed to the Lazarus Group by multiple governments — in which WazirX exposed vulnerabilities that resulted in loss of approximately $234 million in digital assets and triggered a suspension of trading, withdrawals and deposits. The setback had eroded trust among India’s crypto retail community and drawn regulatory scrutiny.

WazirX co-founder and CEO Nischal Shetty acknowledged the challenge of restoring confidence, stating on social media: “Our focus is only YOU — we are committed to a secure and transparent restart.” Still, some users have raised concerns over discrepancies in post-rebalancing balances, alleging that their credited holdings were lower than earlier display values. WazirX has pledged to release a detailed audit and reconcile any shortfalls.

Industry analysts view WazirX’s relaunch as a litmus test for Indian crypto exchanges, which have faced security, regulatory and trust-deficit issues. While the zero-fee offer may stimulate trading volume and liquidity, questions remain over how effectively WazirX can demonstrate enhanced operational resilience and compliance oversight. Further complicating matters is India’s evolving regulatory landscape: a proposed crypto-assets bill is under discussion, and exchange-licensing frameworks remain undefined.

For traders, the phased rollout presents both opportunity and risk. Market-makers caution that liquidity may be thin in the initial days, potentially creating wider spreads or slippage. WazirX’s blog announcement advises users to monitor token availability, confirm order execution conditions and treat first-day price action with caution. With a delisting of some tokens and swaps or mergers during the downtime, certainty over token status is also being tested.

The implied volatility of Bitcoin has remained unusually elevated even as the equity-market gauge of fear, the S&P 500 Volatility Index, has receded to its usual levels. Data show Bitcoin’s 30-day implied volatility hovering above 50 % after the October 10 market shake-up, while the VIX slipped back below 20 %. This divergence signals a significant recalibration of risk within crypto markets.

Analysts point to a cluster of structural pressures within the crypto ecosystem that are now being priced in: chief among them are auto-deleveraging mechanisms on exchanges, thinning liquidity depth, and offshore funding stress. According to Wintermute co-founder Yoann Turpin, “Bitcoin volatility was subdued earlier… It has now become clear that new risks … such as ADL were underestimated and are now being fully priced in.” In practice, when an exchange triggers ADL it forces closure of profitable offsetting positions when an insurance fund is depleted—this introduces an additional risk vector not present in the mainstream equity markets. The residual impact of a major liquidation event on October 10–11, estimated at over billion, has sharpened market caution.

Liquidity concerns are compounded by the behaviour of market-makers during the crash. According to a recent study, market makers withdrew roughly million from key order-books within hours of the triggering event, creating a vacuum in bid-ask depth and amplifying price moves. Participants say that while the VIX drop reflects a return of calm to equity markets after the shock, Bitcoin’s elevated IV suggests the market is in a higher-volatility regime rather than merely bouncing back. Liquidity in offshore markets, which heavily influences Bitcoin trading, appears particularly tight: for example, the Hong Kong Interbank Offered Rate has returned to pre-May levels even as the U. S. dollar index has risen, signalling funding stress that tends to feed into crypto volatility.

Another factor cited is the rapid growth of exchange-traded funds and over-the-counter desks absorbing Bitcoin supply, creating a supply-shock risk for derivatives and making hedging more expensive. A report warned of a potential “liquidity crisis” within six months for Bitcoin ETF structures unless infrastructure adapts. Meanwhile, the macro backdrop of easing interest-rates and previously abundant liquidity has given way to tighter conditions, which amplify volatility across leveraged assets.

Institutional interest in hedging Bitcoin risk has surged. Following the liquidation that knocked Bitcoin from about to roughly, investors rushed into options contracts that bet on further price drops—put-buying spiked as a hedge against renewed turbulence. Such demand for protection keeps implied volatility elevated even if spot prices settle. At the same time, the VIX’s retreat suggests equity investors believe the shock has passed; crypto markets apparently disagree.

The divergence is significant because implied volatility represents the market’s expectation of future price swings. A 50 % annualised IV for Bitcoin implies expected one-month moves of roughly; by contrast, a 20 % IV for the S&P 500 implies one-month moves of around. Such a gap underscores the unique risk environment in which crypto operates—where leverage, thin liquidity and exchange-specific infrastructure risk matter significantly. Academic research supports this: a recent study found Bitcoin’s risk-premia vary across volatility regimes, and that downside risk is significantly more priced in than with equities.

Market makers and trading desks are adapting. Some are widening spreads, reducing inventory and limiting exposure during volatile episodes—actions that in effect undermine liquidity further and contribute to the “sticky” implied volatility. One trader said that “no one slept” during the weekend of October 10–11, as the cascade of liquidations forced hedge funds and desks to scramble for cover amid evaporating depth.

By Nantoo Banerjee     There is nothing to be particularly shocked about Tata Capital stocks declining 2.4 percent below the company’s IPO issue price of Rs. 326 per share a day after its debut in intraday trade on the Bombay Stock Exchange. Tata Capital, a Tata Sons subsidiary, made a flat debut on Dalal Street on […]

The article SEBI Fails To Prevent Aggressive IPO Pricing To Protect Investors appeared first on Latest India news, analysis and reports on Newspack by India Press Agency).

Tokyo’s financial regulator is advancing a proposal that would permit domestic banks to directly invest in cryptocurrencies such as Bitcoin and operate crypto exchanges, marking a significant shift from earlier restrictions. The Financial Services Agency is set to present its plans to the Financial System Council—an advisory body to the prime minister—later this month.

Under the existing regime promulgated in 2020, Japanese banks have been effectively barred from acquiring and holding digital assets for investment purposes, owing to concerns about volatility and financial-stability risk. The new regulatory blueprint would align crypto asset holdings by banks with traditional financial instruments such as stocks and government bonds, while introducing capital and risk-management requirements tailored to the asset class.

According to data cited by the FSA, Japan’s crypto account holdings have climbed past 12 million as of February 2025—a roughly 3.5-fold increase over five years. The surge in retail interest is growing pressure on regulators to provide greater clarity and institutional-grade infrastructure. Amid this backdrop, the proposed reforms aim to usher in a more integrated digital-asset ecosystem under the purview of regulated financial institutions.

The FSA’s initiative encompasses three key pillars: Firstly, banks would be authorised to purchase and hold unbacked crypto assets for trading or investment, subject to strict internal controls and exposure limits.  Secondly, bank groups may register as licensed “cryptocurrency exchange operators,” effectively allowing them to offer trading and custody services in-house rather than relying solely on third-party platforms.  Thirdly, the FSA plans to shift oversight of digital assets from the current Payment Services Act regime into the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act framework, thereby affording crypto the same legal mould as securities.

Banking groups in Japan are already responding. Three of the country’s largest financial institutions—Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group and Mizuho Financial Group—have announced a joint plan to issue a yen-pegged stablecoin for corporate settlements, signalling a broader shift into digital assets.

Supporters of the reforms argue that allowing regulated banks to engage with crypto assets will bolster investor protections, improve custody and transactional infrastructure, and widen market access. “This reform will treat cryptocurrencies similar to other investible asset classes under bank supervision,” noted one industry analyst. However, sceptics caution that the volatility of cryptocurrencies remains elevated and that exposure must be managed carefully to prevent end-user or systemic risk.

Regulatory design will therefore place a heavy emphasis on limiting banks’ direct holdings of digital assets relative to their capital base, imposing heightened disclosure and governance mandates. One working-group paper recommends that banks maintain separate risk-allocations and stress-testing frameworks for crypto, akin to those used for foreign-exchange or commodity trading desks.

The tax and legal context are also evolving. Japan is preparing to introduce a flat 20 % capital-gains tax on crypto assets as part of its 2025 reforms, and certain tokens are slated to be reclassified as securities under the FIEA. These measures are designed to reduce uncertainty for institutional participants and global investors seeking regulated exposure to digital assets.

Market participants appear cautiously optimistic. Some regional banks are exploring pilot custody services for institutional clients, while fintech firms anticipate greater collaboration with mainstream banks as eligibility expands. On the flip side, legacy concerns persist: past hacks and exchange failures have left regulators and consumers wary of governance failures and inadequate transparency.

Bitcoin’s price dropped below $105,000 early Friday in London trading, recovering marginally later but signalling mounting pressure in crypto markets. Bloomberg data showed a fall of as much as 3 percent before a modest bounce. The slide comes after a week of heightened volatility that has dragged digital-asset valuations lower.

The crypto sector has shed billions. Total market capitalisation fell to its lowest point since July, as institutional and leveraged positions faced heavy liquidations. Ethereum, the second-largest token, also fell sharply, trading under $3,800.

One key driver has been intensifying stress in U. S. regional banks. Shares of Zions Bancorp plunged after it disclosed a $50 million loan impairment, while Western Alliance is embroiled in fraud allegations tied to borrowers. Those troubles have sparked a “flight to safety” across risk assets, nudging investors away from speculative trades.

The collapse in derivatives markets was steep: over $1 billion in long and short positions were wiped out in rolling liquidations, especially on exchanges with aggressive leverage mechanics. The drop below the 200-day moving average—around $107,500—has undermined a long-term support zone, fuelling further anxiety among traders.

At the same time, trading volume surged. Weekly volume for Bitcoin hit its highest level since March, suggesting heavy participation even amid panic. Some analysts see that as a sign of re-accumulation by institutional players, though it remains unclear whether those inflows will stabilise prices.

Technical watchers are eyeing potential floor zones near $100,000, while others suggest $88,000 could act as an “open target” if selling accelerates. Meanwhile, on-chain data reveals that wallets holding between 100 and 1,000 BTC—sometimes called “shark wallets”—are accumulating aggressively, marking the fastest rate of inflow since 2013. Those trends echo previous panic phases, which often preceded longer rallies.

Some observers caution that Bitcoin’s repeated failure to behave as a “safe harbour” during market stress undermines one of its selling points. Still, others argue that the fundamentals remain intact—citing diminishing supply on exchanges, renewed institutional interest, and the durability of blockchain infrastructure.

Volatility is unlikely to subside soon. The week ahead includes major U. S. economic data releases and potential policy statements from central banks that could sway risk sentiment. In parallel, geopolitical frictions—particularly over trade and supply chains—may further rattle markets already in flux.

Over $250 million has been wiped out from leveraged positions across major cryptocurrency markets within the last 60 minutes, according to real-time tracker alerts. The bulk of the liquidations hit long bets, triggering a sharp lash of volatility that rattled traders across exchanges.

Data from multiple crypto-analytics feeds show that Bitcoin and Ethereum bore the brunt of the forced closures, with long positions cascading under mounting downward pressure. The alerts indicate that around $200 million of that total was liquidated in just the preceding 15 minutes. Margin calls and automatic stop-loss triggers have sharply pared back open interest.

Market participants point to a combination of lower-than-expected macro signals and heightened global risk aversion as catalysts for the sudden liquidation wave. Macro equity markets have seen risk assets fall under pressure over the past sessions, prompting a spillover into speculative crypto positions. The added strain from derivatives exposure amplified the move.

Crypto exchange data show that Binance, Bybit and OKX recorded the highest volumes of liquidations, especially in their perpetual futures markets. On Binance alone, over $80 million in long positions may have been forcibly closed, according to traders cross-checking the on-chain and order-book flows. Ethereum perpetuals also registered substantial losses, particularly in mid- and high-leverage tiers.

Analysts observing funding rates and open interest across exchanges have flagged an abrupt deleveraging. The funding rates for many altcoins flipped negative, signalling that the short side was gaining dominance as leverage unwound. Open interest across high-risk tokens dropped by 15 – 20 % in many cases, suppressing liquidity and heightening slippage.

Several algorithmic trading desks and quant funds experienced knock-on effects. As large liquidations pulled prices lower, stop orders cascaded, exacerbating the decline in thin markets. Some trading firms reported losses due to slippage and forced exits—even though positions were hedged—with automated strategies failing to escape the downdraft in time.

A few larger holders, often designated as ‘whales’, appear to have opportunistically repositioned. Some have placed bids closer to now-discounted levels in anticipation of a bounce; others reduced exposure altogether. On-chain indicators suggest increased inflows to stablecoin pools and accumulation in non-spot holdings, hinting at a cautious redeployment rather than wholesale exit.

Institutional interest remains muted amid the turmoil. According to contacts in digital-asset fund management, most institutions were already operating with limited leverage and hedges in place. Few entered new positions during the seizure of volatility, and many paused trades to watch whether support levels would hold.

Citizens Bank has launched coverage of SharpLink Gaming, assigning it a “market outperform” rating and a price target of $50, implying upside in excess of 200 percent from current levels.

The bank’s analysis hinges on SharpLink’s positioning as a publicly traded entity that actively manages an Ether treasury, combining yield-bearing deployment strategies with equity-market mechanisms to enhance value. Citizens projects that ETH’s long-term price trajectory, together with SharpLink’s operational model, could underpin substantial growth.

Citizens expects SharpLink’s net asset value to rise as the company compounds returns from staking, liquid restaking, and other on-chain yield strategies. The bank cites management’s capacity to issue equity above NAV or repurchase shares when trading below NAV as a leverage point for shareholder value.

SharpLink is led by Ethereum co-founder Joseph Lubin, who serves as Chairman, and Joseph Chalom, formerly of BlackRock, as Co-CEO. The bank underscores this combination of crypto ecosystem pedigree and traditional capital markets acumen as a competitive advantage.

In its report, Citizens forecasts ETH could exceed $7,000 by 2026, potentially pushing beyond $20,000 by 2030, and argues that SharpLink offers one of the few pure-play equity vehicles tied to Ether exposure. The bank describes SharpLink’s operating model as a “flywheel” in which yield-generated returns accelerate NAV per share, further facilitating growth capital.

Citizens’ valuation assigns a premium multiple to SharpLink’s NAV, justified by management execution and the structural optionality inherent in an actively managed ETH treasury. The report points to the possibility that investor recognition of this optionality could drive valuation multiple expansion.

SharpLink has also taken steps consistent with the thesis. It has initiated a share buyback programme, repurchasing approximately 939,000 shares at an average price of $15.98, and the board has authorised up to $1.5 billion in share repurchases for capital allocation flexibility. In tandem, SharpLink disclosed it holds around $3.6 billion in ETH, nearly all staked to produce yield.

Meanwhile, B. Riley has initiated coverage of SharpLink with a “Buy” rating and a $32 target, casting some contrast in outlook. B. Riley emphasises that the company’s discount to modified NAV is attractive — currently trading at 0.8× mNAV — and expects upward re-rating to 1.5× mNAV within 12 months, contingent on ETH accumulation and damping equity issuance dilution.