News related to
Chinese

Foreign institutional investor activity has slowed, but India’s equity market is gaining a new level of sophistication thanks to the rapid emergence of long‑short strategies among domestic analysts. With regulatory approval of the Specialised Investment Fund route and increasing recognition of sell‑side research, analysts in India are setting new standards, outperforming peers in major global markets.

At the centre of this shift are flagship long‑short funds, enabled by an April amendment that allowed mutual funds to engage in both long and short equity positions via the SIF framework. Industry leaders such as ICICI Prudential, SBI, Quant and ITI Mutual Funds are among the first to roll out these products. This structural innovation, viewed by asset managers as a game‑changer, allows strategic hedging and enhanced alpha generation in volatile conditions.

Jatinder Pal Singh, CEO of ITI Mutual Fund, identifies the move as a watershed moment: “We see a lot of potential in this category similar to what we have seen in alternative investment funds…”. Quantitative and hedge fund entrants—AlphaGrep, Abakkus and Carnelian—are also applying for SIF licences, signalling a rising tide of systematic strategies.

The surge in long-short offerings emerges against a backdrop of changing investor sentiment and derivative market structures. While proprietary traders and retail continue to dominate derivatives trading—accounting for 52.3% and 33.6% respectively—domestic institutional participation remains minimal at just 0.2%. The launch of these funds is expected to usher in broader institutional adoption, reducing reliance on speculative flows.

Simultaneously, foreign players are reassessing their exposure. Citigroup downgraded Indian equities to “neutral” citing stretched valuations and slower earnings growth. Bank of America has flagged valuation concerns as part of seven headwinds to near‑term market performance, though it remains bullish on India’s long‑run structural strengths. Morgan Stanley echoes this optimism, describing the market as undervalued and promising for patient investors.

At the nexus of these developments, sell‑side analysts play a pivotal role. Their long‑short models provide more nuanced insights, enabling differentiated strategies compared to conventional long‑only approaches. This evolution mirrors practices in advanced markets, where close analyst coverage is integral to informed decision‑making.

International observers are taking note. Carson Block, known for his critical research into Chinese markets, is considering launching a long‑short or long‑only fund in India, citing opportunities in corporate transparency and leveraging tax-friendly jurisdictions like GIFT City. His interest signals growing confidence in the depth and potential of India’s equity ecosystem.

The broader equities landscape reflects these shifts. Foreign institutional investors are ramping up bearish positions in derivatives, signalling caution amid valuation concerns and global uncertainties. Concurrently, new equity supply is expanding, with a surge in IPOs and share sales reflecting a 14% rise in benchmark indices over the preceding six months. Analysts warn that without strong institutional demand, this wave may trigger volatility.

Experts argue the timing could not be better for long‑short funds. As valuations plateau and geopolitical uncertainty remains — including Middle East tensions affecting crude prices — the ability to manage risk through hedging becomes decisive. Fund managers are betting that structured strategies will better manage these headwinds.

At the same time, India’s growing affluent class—from double‑digit income growth to rising equity allocation—adds tailwinds. Wealth managers like 360 One are expanding advisory services amid rising assets under management, reflecting the country’s broader push toward financial sophistication. The development of long‑short funds aligns with these trends, offering differentiated solutions to high‑net‑worth investors seeking yield in uncertain markets.

Yet challenges remain. Institutional engagement in derivatives must scale meaningfully to support product viability. Regulators and market infrastructure will need to adapt, ensuring transparency and risk‑management frameworks keep pace. Moreover, investor education is critical; long‑short strategies are complex and require a clear understanding of leverage, margin risk and counterparty exposures.

Nonetheless, the direction is clear: Indian equity markets are transitioning from conventional long‑only investing to embrace multi‑directional strategies, leveraging deep local research and structural innovation. With the SIF framework opening doors for long‑short funds, analysts are stepping into roles once reserved for global peers. As Citi tones down enthusiasm and global investors tread cautiously, India’s analysts are sharpening tools that could redefine the domestic landscape—and perhaps export this model abroad.

A significant majority of sovereign wealth funds from the Middle East are poised to increase their investments in Chinese assets over the coming five years, according to the latest findings from Invesco’s Global Sovereign Asset Management Study. This shift places China at the forefront of strategic allocation decisions, reflecting growing confidence in its innovation-led sectors.

The study, conducted between January and March and covering funds and central banks managing a combined US$27 trillion, reveals that around 60% of Middle Eastern sovereign wealth funds are planning to boost exposure to China. This places the region only behind Asia‑Pacific and Africa, where 88% and 80% of funds respectively intend to raise allocations. North American counterparts also show strong interest, with approximately 73% signalling intent to increase investment in China.

Funds across regions cited strong returns—identified by 71% of respondents—as a key motivator, alongside diversification goals cited by 63% and improved market access for foreigners mentioned by 45%. Chinese innovation sectors, including digital technology, software, advanced manufacturing, automation, and clean energy, are particularly attractive, with 89% indicating interest in digital tech and software, and 70% each for manufacturing and green energy.

Participants in the study included 141 senior investment professionals—chief investment officers, asset-class heads and portfolio strategists—drawn from 83 sovereign wealth funds and 58 central banks globally. The high participation rate lends weight to the findings: China is now ranked as a high or moderate priority for 59% of funds, a notable jump from the previous year.

Despite geopolitical tensions between Washington and Beijing, sovereign funds appear more focused on structural opportunities. North American allocations towards China are framed as strategic, long-term bets in innovation rather than reactive moves to policy friction. As one Invesco executive described, investors appear driven by fear of missing out on China’s strides in semiconductors, AI, EVs and renewable energy—“a strategic urgency they once directed toward Silicon Valley”.

A regional lens reveals the Middle Eastern shift as part of a larger recalibration. Sovereign funds in the Gulf and from oil-rich neighbours are increasingly turning to China not just for commodity trades but for diversified returns and access to high-growth sectors. One Middle Eastern fund commented that the credit spectrum in fixed income markets currently offers more attractive risk-adjusted returns than public equities, underlining a broader repositioning.

Globally, sovereign investors are embracing active management, allocating more to fixed income and private credit as markets normalise post ultra-low interest rate era. Thirty‑nine per cent of funds plan to increase fixed income exposure, underscoring a pivot towards liquidity management and resilience. Private credit usage has expanded sharply, from 30% to 44% in direct or co-investments, reflecting growing appetite for yield and portfolio diversification.

Central banks are also reshaping strategy, with 64% planning to grow reserve holdings and 53% aiming to diversify further within two years. Gold remains a popular hedge: almost half intend to expand allocations over the next three years. The dominance of the US dollar persists, with 78% expecting no credible alternative supply within the next two decades.

A modest entrant in the digital asset space, sovereign wealth funds are gradually increasing exposure to digital currencies. Direct allocations rose to 11% from 7% in 2022, most pronounced in the Middle East, Asia‑Pacific and North America. Stablecoins, viewed as more accessible than traditional crypto, are gaining attention among emerging market funds.

China remains a focal point for global sovereign investors seeking exposure to growth-critical sectors and structural diversification. The convergence of strong returns, market access improvements, and sectoral opportunities is driving Middle Eastern and other funds to recalibrate their portfolios. China has transitioned from an optional allocation into a central pillar of future-focused asset strategies, marking a calculated investment pivot amid an evolving global landscape.

Swatch Group’s first‑half figures underscore a deepening crisis in its key Asian markets after the Swiss watch‑maker disclosed a 7.1 per cent drop in sales, generating CHF 3.059 billion, falling short of market forecasts of CHF 3.2 billion. Operating profit plunged 67 per cent year‑on‑year to CHF 68 million, signalling an urgent warning to investors and management alike.

China, alongside Hong Kong and Macau, remains the primary weak spot, contributing 27 per cent of total revenues. Falling demand across these regions continues to undermine core sales and profit performance. Despite encouraging double‑digit growth in North America and market share gains in countries such as Japan, India and the Middle East, these gains have yet to compensate for the shortfall from Greater China.

Net profit attributable to owners collapsed to CHF 3 million, compared with CHF 136 million during the same six‑month period last year. This dramatic decline illustrates the scale of the downturn, making it Swatch’s worst half‑year performance in recent memory.

Analyst commentary has been scathing: Vontobel described this period as “an ugly half year for Swatch Group in all respects”. The fallout from slowed Chinese consumer activity has been compounded by negative currency effects—Swiss franc appreciation cut CHF 113 million from turnover relative to constant‑currency comparisons.

Adding fresh complexity, new U. S. tariffs threaten to raise costs on Swiss watch imports by up to 31 per cent. Industry stakeholders now warn that these levies could further weigh on margins, with retailers like Watches of Switzerland projecting a margin squeeze in the year ahead.

Beyond external pressures, a growing number of investors are scrutinising Swatch’s internal governance. Shareholder activism has surfaced, with calls for more oversight of the centrally controlled Hayek family, whose dual‑class voting structure remains a source of contention. Net profits collapsed by 75 per cent to CHF 219 million in 2024, but critics assert that this malaise runs deeper. GreenWood Investors, led by Steven Wood, has launched a push to join the board, advocating for brand revitalisation, governance reforms and a strategy pivot toward luxury exclusivity akin to Hermès and Ferrari.

Management, though addressing short‑term volatility, emphasises Swatch’s entrenched strengths. Its vertically integrated manufacturing, with over 150 production sites, and the success of the affordable MoonSwatch line demonstrate resilience. The company has pledged that cost‑cutting measures and a pipeline of new product launches—particularly in the U. S. and Japan—should drive a rebound in the second half of the year.

The first‑half slump follows broader downturns last year, when revenue declined 12.2 per cent to CHF 6.74 billion in 2024, and operating profit fell 75 per cent to CHF 304 million. That drop reinforced trading floor rumours of governance fatigue and brand dilution at high‑end labels like Omega and Breguet.

Economically, China’s consumer landscape remains unsettled. A combination of property market stress, slower GDP growth and official campaigns discouraging conspicuous consumption have dampened luxury spending. Swiss watch exports to China and Hong Kong plunged by double digits in early 2024, while only the lower‑priced Swatch line bucked the trend in the region, gaining 10 per cent in sales volume.

Swatch Group’s corporate ambition to maintain full production capacity and avoid layoffs during weak demand, while strategically commendable, has weighed on margins—especially in the production segment. Management asserts this decision safeguards long‑term capabilities and is now beginning to bear fruit, with production margins improving since June.

Mixed signs beyond China offer guarded optimism. North America posted record sales, Japan recorded robust growth, and emerging markets like India and the Middle East offered upside. These regions now form the central axis of Swatch’s recovery strategy.

Uber Technologies and Baidu Inc. have confirmed a multi‑year strategic alliance to bring Baidu’s Apollo Go autonomous robotaxis to markets beyond the U. S. and mainland China, initiating the programme later this year in select cities across Asia and the Middle East. The new service, integrated into the Uber app, will offer riders the option to choose fully driver‑free vehicles powered by Apollo Go’s advanced AI systems.

Apollo Go currently operates the world’s largest driverless ride‑hailing network, with more than 1,000 fully autonomous vehicles deployed across 15 cities—including Dubai and Abu Dhabi—and over 11 million rides completed as of May 2025. The expansion, announced on 15 July 2025, marks a significant move by Uber as it intensifies its foray into autonomous vehicles, supplementing existing partnerships with other AV developers such as Waymo, Pony AI, WeRide, May Mobility, Volkswagen and Avride.

Uber CEO Dara Khosrowshahi described the venture as a decisive milestone: “This partnership brings together two of the world’s most iconic technology companies to help shape the future of mobility. As the world’s largest platform of its kind, spanning mobility, delivery, and freight, Uber is uniquely positioned to help AV leaders like Baidu bring their autonomous technology to the world.” Baidu’s co‑founder and CEO Robin Li added that integrating Baidu’s autonomous driving technology with Uber’s network represents “a major milestone in deploying our technology on a global scale,” aimed at delivering safe, efficient and cost‑effective transport to a wider audience.

Market response to the announcement has been positive: Uber’s shares rose more than 1 % in pre‑market trading in the U. S., while Baidu’s U. S.‑listed stocks surged almost 5 %, reflecting investor confidence in the deal’s potential to accelerate autonomous mobility adoption worldwide.

The initial deployment targets key cities in Asia—potentially including Singapore and Malaysia where Baidu plans to launch Apollo Go this year—and in the Gulf region, where regulatory environments are favourable and infrastructure is supportive. Recent reports highlight that Gulf countries such as the UAE and Saudi Arabia aim to have at least 25 % of transport in major cities autonomous by 2030‑2040, presenting a promising opportunity for robotaxi services.

Analysts view the Uber‑Baidu partnership as a pivotal step in global AV expansion. By entering markets outside its core regions, Baidu leverages an “asset‑light” international strategy driven by collaboration instead of proprietary platforms. Uber gains immediate access to a proven self‑driving fleet without the development time and costs associated with in‑house technology, bolstering its competitiveness in the robotaxi space, particularly against rivals like Lyft and Waymo.

Safety and regulatory scrutiny remain top concerns. Apollo Go’s record of over 11 million rides with a robust safety profile strengthens public and regulatory confidence. Still, each market’s regulatory readiness varies, requiring phased live testing and strong oversight to meet local licensing standards.

Financially, the deal promises dividend benefits. By significantly increasing supply of robotaxis through Uber’s platform, Baidu stands to accelerate revenue from its autonomous segment, potentially addressing investor concerns over its core advertising business. Uber, which has seen its stock climb 56 % this year, reinforces its diversification into autonomous and freight services ahead of its Q2 earnings report scheduled for 6 August.

Competition is heating up. The Gulf region already hosts partnerships between Uber and Chinese AV firms such as Pony AI and WeRide, both of which are conducting trials or planning roll‑outs in Dubai and Abu Dhabi. Baidu’s entry into this competitive space joins a growing group of Chinese robotaxi operators—such as Pony AI, AutoX, DiDi and WeRide—vying for global market share.

While the United States and mainland China remain outside the deal’s scope—due to complex regulatory frameworks and entrenched competition—Uber and Baidu have hinted at future expansions into Europe and Oceania, suggesting a long‑term global vision. Baidu’s ongoing engagement with European regulators, including Switzerland and Turkey, supports predictions for expanded rollout later this year.

China has introduced the world’s first oil tanker equipped with adjustable sails, marking a notable step in maritime decarbonisation. The 250‑metre vessel features automated sails that harness wind power, cutting diesel use by up to 14.5 tonnes per day—equivalent to around 5,000 tonnes of CO₂ emissions annually.

The ship was launched at a major Chinese port on 13 July 2025. Naval engineers report that the sails adjust in real time to wind conditions, seamlessly integrating with traditional propulsion systems. Under favourable conditions, the sails alone can provide up to 10% of the vessel’s forward thrust, reducing reliance on fossil fuels and trimming operational costs.

Industry experts describe this as a breakthrough. Dr Li Wei, a maritime technology specialist at a prominent Chinese university, observed that “this marks the first large‑scale application of intelligent sail technology in an oil tanker” and said that the design “could serve as a blueprint for future green tankers”. While alternative zero‑carbon fuels remain the focus of long‑term strategies, sail augmentation presents a practical interim solution.

The initiative aligns with global regulatory pressures. The International Maritime Organization has committed to halving greenhouse‑gas emissions from shipping by 2050. Flettner‑style rotor sails—used on vessels like the Viking Grace ferry—have shown up to 20% fuel savings on optimal routes. China’s innovation refines that concept by adding adjustable sail arrays tailored for large oil carriers, suggesting broader applicability.

Major energy and shipping firms are reportedly evaluating roll‑outs. A senior executive at a state‑affiliated shipping group noted plans to retrofit a fleet of oil and chemical tankers with adjustable sails by 2027, contingent on performance data. Initial trials aim to quantify actual fuel savings, spreadsheeting data on fuel burn, wind usage hours, and analytics from the ship’s sail‑control system.

Yet questions remain. Retrofit costs, structural modifications, and maintenance demand rigorous cost‑benefit analysis. Port infrastructure adaptation—such as clearance for sails and crew training—must also be addressed. Critics argue that, while useful, sail technology cannot fully eliminate emissions without complementary measures like low‑carbon fuels and electrification.

Nevertheless, China’s venture may shift the conversation. Shipbuilders in Europe, Japan and South Korea are racing to develop hydrogen‑ or ammonia‑powered vessels. China’s move showcases an alternative decarbonisation route by optimising existing diesel‑powered fleets. Multi‑source interviews show growing interest from global charterers, some of whom are signalling willingness to pay premium freight rates for lower‑emission vessels.

Maritime insurers are recalibrating risk models, acknowledging that adjustable sails could affect stability and route safety. The new tanker reportedly features advanced ballast‑control systems to compensate for wind forces and automated cut‑out mechanisms during storms.

Trade analysts say China’s state‑backed strategy gives it leverage in global standards talks. Should pilot data validate the 14.5‑tonne daily fuel savings estimate, Chinese shipyards could license or export the design. Such a trend could trigger wider international adoption, pressuring other nations to follow suit.

Shipowners are watching. A European tanker operator, examining images and footage, expressed interest but noted the need for “transparent data on lifecycle emission reductions and economic viability over 20‑year vessel lifetimes.”

Current trials will last six months to a year, tracking metrics like fuel consumption, sail uptime, and maintenance costs. A detailed performance report is expected by mid‑2026, after which retrofit plans may accelerate.

Oil traded in a narrow range as tariffs and sanctions threats unsettled global markets, weighing heavily on the outlook for energy demand. Brent hovered just above $70 a barrel, while West Texas Intermediate stayed above $68. Futures markets weakened as U. S. equity-index futures dropped following fresh trade tensions between Washington and key global partners.

U. S. President Donald Trump escalated tariff threats, targeting both the European Union and Mexico with 30 per cent duties and flagging potential levies against Brazil, the Philippines, Japan, South Korea and others. Markets interpreted this as a risk to economic momentum, especially in energy‑sensitive regions of Asia, denting crude demand expectations. At the same time, Asian buyers adopted a cautious stance, amplifying downward pressure on oil.

Against this backdrop, investors are eyeing a scheduled “major statement” from President Trump concerning Russia. Anticipation of new sanctions against the country, a major oil producer, lent modest support to prices that might otherwise have fallen further. Still, this support was checked by rising output from OPEC+ and a pause in geopolitical flare-ups in the Middle East.

Data from the International Energy Agency signals that global oil markets remain relatively tight. Summer driving seasons and increased refinery activity have buoyed demand, although analysts note that elevated output from Saudi Arabia—above its OPEC+ quota—puts a dent in any sustained rally. The kingdom disputes claims of non‑compliance, stating marketed crude remains within agreed limits.

Market watchers also flag OPEC+ plans to hike production by approximately 548,000 barrels per day in August, potentially followed by another boost in September. ING warns these moves could put the market into surplus in the final quarter of 2025. Additionally, the group revised its global demand forecasts downward for 2026–29, citing weakening growth in China.

Further clouding the outlook, heightened tariff uncertainty is exerting macroeconomic drag. The IEA forecasts a meaningful drop in global oil consumption growth for 2025, down a third from earlier projections, due in part to Trump’s tariff measures. Analysts stress that inflationary pressures and slower global trade would dampen energy demand.

From a logistical standpoint, renewed Houthi tensions in the Red Sea have introduced another variable, interrupting shipping and supporting prices marginally. Still, Middle East volatility has largely receded compared with levels seen earlier this year.

Looking ahead, market players are set to digest a blend of geopolitical and macroeconomic signals. Key Chinese trade figures due soon may reveal shifts in demand. OPEC+ decisions on output will be scrutinised closely, as will the next moves in Washington’s trade and sanctions policy. Meanwhile, U. S. gasoline consumption remains robust, with the Energy Information Administration reporting a 6 per cent increase to 9.2 million barrels per day—signalling that underlying demand has not yet faltered.

Oil markets are caught between supportive fundamentals—such as strong summer demand, supply constraints from Russia and geopolitical flare‑ups—and sobering headwinds from proposed tariffs, elevated output and macroeconomic uncertainty. Traders remain cautious, awaiting concrete policy developments from Washington, data releases from China, and steps by OPEC+ to navigate a market landscape that is anything but stable.

Oil prices have shifted sharply this week, with demand forecasts now under pressure from escalating trade tensions fuelled by fresh tariffs. Brent crude is trading in the high‑60s per barrel, while benchmark WTI hovers around mid‑60s, reflecting growing investor caution. Analysts point to revised supply and demand projections as indicators of a changing market landscape.

An International Energy Agency monthly report has cut its global oil‑demand growth forecast for 2025 to 700,000 bpd, the slowest pace since 2009 outside the pandemic, down from 720,000 bpd last month. The downgrade reflects weaker consumption in emerging markets and a cooling US‑China trade outlook. Supply continues to outpace demand as OPEC+ ramps up production; global output in June rose by about 950,000 bpd to reach 105.6 mbpd.

The IEA notes the oil market remains technically in surplus, with inventories building globally—even as regional stock draws persist. Oil runs at refineries have slowed, particularly in the US and China, enabling downward revisions in demand projections. Enverus Intelligence Research offers a counter‑view, pointing to balanced OECD inventories and sustained summer demand north of 1 mbpd, which may support higher prices.

The US Energy Information Administration expects US crude oil production to plateau at roughly 13.4 mbpd in 2025, dropping modestly later this year as lower prices curb drilling activity. Despite this, producers remain vulnerable to profit erosion unless prices stabilise in the $65–70 range.

President Trump’s trade moves have reignited fears of another global trade war, with new tariff letters dispatched to Brazil, South Korea, Japan, the Philippines and others this week. Threats of 50% duties on exports such as copper, semiconductor components and auto parts are weighing heavily on commodity‑linked equity markets and raising recession risk concerns. Oil prices dropped more than 2% on Thursday as benchmark futures responded to the potential hit to economic growth.

While some market participants remain in “wait‑and‑see” mode, given Trump’s unpredictability and history of policy reversals, the overarching effect is to dampen demand forecasts. Onyx Capital’s head of research, Harry Tchilinguirian, cautions against overreaction but acknowledges that tariffs are adding to inflationary pressures and may reinforce Federal Reserve caution.

Geopolitical flashpoints in the Middle East continue to influence sentiment. Oil surged in June as Iran threatened to close the Strait of Hormuz, which handles almost 20% of world oil shipments, but prices eased once the waterway remained open. Meanwhile, Saudi Arabia raised official prices to consumers, citing strong demand in China’s post‑pandemic recovery, though refiners are reporting margin squeezes.

Financial institutions have started to reflect this shifting environment in their projections. A Reuters‑polled group of 40 analysts revised Brent average forecasts for 2025 to $67.86 per barrel—up marginally from May—while predicting demand growth of only around 730,000 bpd. JP Morgan cut its annual Brent estimate to $66, citing rising OPEC+ output and sluggish consumption. TD Economics trimmed its forecast further, expecting 2025 WTI to average near $62, warning of sustained downward pressure from trade risk and oversupply.

Two factors loom large over the coming months. First, the path of trade tensions: further tariff escalations or retaliatory actions could erode industrial activity and fuel sales. Second, OPEC+ strategy: with the bloc unconstrained in raising output, additional production could overwhelm tepid demand, pushing prices below current levels. The IEA projects supply growth for 2025 at 2.1 mbpd, while demand is seen rising just 700 kbpd.

On the financial front, hedge fund positioning has turned cautious, registering the sharpest drop in bullish sentiment since February. Traders are forecasting narrower price ranges ahead, with elevated volatility as tariff developments hit market headlines.

Forward‑looking forecasts remain mixed. EIA projects Brent to average $68.89 in 2025 and $58.48 in 2026, marking a seasonal decline. Enverus suggests the upside remains intact if demand holds steady, especially with summer driving season underway. Market watchers also note that rising gas‑to‑oil switching costs, refinery restarts and diminished spare capacity could temper price declines.

China’s consumption is also under scrutiny. While Beijing seeks to stimulate growth through fiscal and monetary tools, investor sentiment remains fragile. Saudi’s decision to push prices higher was based on perceived strengthening in Chinese demand, but many analysts caution that any slow‑down could rapidly tip the balance.

Emerging long‑term trends offer some balance. IEA’s long‑term outlook suggests oil demand will continue rising through the late 2020s, driven by non‑OECD economies and slower clean‑energy adoption, delaying peak demand beyond 2030. Nonetheless, short‑term price direction seems firmly tied to macroeconomic risks and geopolitical dynamics.