News related to
First

Smart Mobility International , a UAE-based distributor of New Energy Vehicles , has entered into a strategic partnership with IM Motors, a Chinese electric vehicle manufacturer co-founded by SAIC Motor, Alibaba Group, and Shanghai Zhangjiang Hi-Tech Park Development. This collaboration aims to introduce IM Motors’ premium electric vehicles to the United Arab Emirates , marking the brand’s inaugural entry into the Gulf Cooperation Council region.

IM Motors, established in 2020, has rapidly gained recognition for its innovative approach to electric mobility. The company’s vehicle lineup includes models such as the IM L7 sedan and the IM LS7 SUV, both of which have garnered attention for their advanced technology and design. In March 2024, IM Motors secured over 8 billion yuan in a Series B equity financing round. This funding, one of the largest investments in Chinese EV brands in recent years, was led by prominent state-backed investors, including Bank of China’s asset management unit, an investment arm of Agricultural Bank of China, and Shanghai government-backed Lingang Group. The capital infusion is earmarked for the development of new smart car models, technological advancements, and overseas expansion plans.

SMI has been proactive in aligning with the UAE’s vision for sustainable transportation. In January 2025, the company announced the opening of a specialized NEV service center in Dubai’s Al Quoz automotive district. This facility is designed to offer comprehensive maintenance services tailored to electric vehicles, including quick service areas, specialized battery care sections, and advanced diagnostic tools. The initiative reflects SMI’s commitment to supporting the UAE’s goal of increasing NEVs to 50% of the total vehicles on the nation’s roads by 2050.

The partnership between SMI and IM Motors is poised to introduce a range of premium electric vehicles to the UAE market. While specific models and timelines have yet to be announced, industry observers anticipate that IM Motors’ flagship vehicles, such as the IM L7 and IM LS7, will be among the first offerings. These models are known for their cutting-edge features, including autonomous driving capabilities, advanced infotainment systems, and impressive driving ranges.

The UAE’s automotive market has witnessed a surge in interest towards electric vehicles, driven by government initiatives promoting sustainable energy and reducing carbon emissions. The introduction of IM Motors’ vehicles is expected to cater to the growing demand for high-performance, environmentally friendly transportation options.

Global oil prices have fallen to their lowest levels in over four years, driven by escalating trade tensions and fears of a global economic slowdown. Brent crude dropped by 3.79% to $60.44 per barrel, while West Texas Intermediate declined by 4.13% to $57.12, marking their lowest points since February 2021. This decline follows the United States’ implementation of 104% tariffs on Chinese imports, after Beijing maintained its 34% retaliatory tariffs on U.S. goods. The escalating tit-for-tat measures have dampened hopes for a swift resolution, raising concerns about a deepening global recession and diminishing energy demand.

Compounding the situation, the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries and its allies plan to increase output by 411,000 barrels per day in May, potentially leading to a supply surplus. Analysts warn that this move could further destabilize the market. Despite a slight easing from a 1.1 million-barrel decrease in U.S. crude inventories, overall sentiment remains bearish. Goldman Sachs forecasts further declines in oil prices through 2025 and 2026. Additionally, Russia’s ESPO Blend oil has, for the first time, dropped below the $60 Western price cap, underlining the global pressure on oil markets.

In Canada, oil and gas executives are adopting a cautious approach in response to the price slump. Doug Bartole, CEO of InPlay Oil, indicated that while immediate cutbacks in production or spending are not planned, sustained low prices, especially around $50 per barrel, could prompt strategic reassessments. InPlay recently completed a C$321 million acquisition of Alberta oil assets from Obsidian Energy, despite market uncertainties. Analysts from ATB Capital Markets have downgraded InPlay’s share target based on current low WTI price levels. Economist Peter Tertzakian noted that while major oil sands companies can sustain lower prices, smaller firms may need to adjust capital expenditures if the price slump continues. Meanwhile, Birchcliff Energy CEO Chris Carlsen highlighted a potential benefit for natural gas producers, as reduced oil drilling may decrease associated gas output, potentially tightening supply.

The sharp decline in oil prices poses significant challenges for Saudi Arabia’s ambitious Vision 2030 megaprojects, including the futuristic Neom city. Oil remains the backbone of the kingdom’s economy, despite efforts to diversify. With Brent crude recently falling to $62 a barrel and forecasts suggesting further declines due to global economic instability and increased OPEC+ output, the country faces a budget deficit and reduced oil-derived income. Saudi Aramco’s anticipated dividends have dropped significantly, compounding financial pressures. Analysts expect the government may scale back or delay lower-priority projects, focus on key investments like global events, or increase borrowing and taxation. Notably, plans for “The Line” have reportedly been reduced to a 1.5-mile stretch associated with the 2034 FIFA World Cup. Despite reassurances from Saudi officials, concerns persist that the ambitious Neom development, championed by Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, may need to be downsized unless oil revenues recover.

The U.S. administration’s tariff policies have been a significant factor in the market’s volatility. While some argue that the tariffs, impacting about 1% of the $28 trillion U.S. economy, are intended to shift global trade dynamics in favor of the United States and counter countries like China, others believe that the market’s reaction has been exaggerated. Despite the uproar, these tariffs would channel approximately $300 billion annually to the U.S. Treasury. Critics argue that the U.S., while the world’s largest importer, has a relatively low import-to-GDP ratio compared to other countries. They contend that China has more to lose in a trade war due to its export-reliant economy and employment structure. American public sentiment appears cautiously supportive of fair trade measures, especially against perceived Chinese industrial subsidies. Some suggest that markets should adopt a wait-and-see approach rather than panicking, likening the administration’s stance to the backlash faced by UK Prime Minister Liz Truss over her economic reform attempts, suggesting a resistance to market-driven pressure.

Falling oil prices, encouraged by policies aimed at reducing regulatory burdens, may bring lower gasoline costs but also discourage new oil production due to unprofitable pricing levels and economic uncertainty. Efforts to stimulate future energy production, such as expanding drilling access and reviving coal via executive order, are counterbalanced by cautious industry investment amidst global trade tensions. Additionally, March 2025 was the second-warmest on record globally, with Arctic sea ice hitting a near half-century low, continuing a concerning trend of climate anomalies. On the tech front, battery startup Bedrock Materials is shutting down due to competitiveness issues against cheaper lithium-ion technology from China. Meanwhile, Tesla alum Drew Baglino’s Heron Power is raising $50 million to develop advanced solid-state transformers, reflecting continued clean-tech investment. Furthermore, the Bezos Earth Fund and Global Methane Hub announced a $27.4 million initiative to identify and breed cattle and sheep that emit less methane, a step toward sustainable livestock farming. These developments reflect significant intersections between policy, environment, and innovation shaping global energy and climate landscapes.

Ripple has announced plans to acquire multi-asset prime brokerage firm Hidden Road for $1.25 billion, marking one of the largest acquisitions in the cryptocurrency sector this year. The deal, involving a combination of cash, XRP tokens, and stock, is expected to close in the coming months.

Brad Garlinghouse, Ripple’s Chief Executive Officer, emphasized that the acquisition aligns with the company’s strategy to expand its presence in the United States, particularly as the regulatory environment becomes more accommodating under the current administration. “The U.S. market is effectively open for the first time due to the regulatory overhang of the former SEC coming to an end, and the market is maturing to address the needs of traditional finance,” Garlinghouse stated.

Hidden Road, founded by Marc Asch in 2018, has established itself as a significant player in the financial markets, processing approximately $3 trillion annually and serving over 300 institutional clients. The firm offers a range of services, including clearing, securities lending, and leveraged trade execution. Asch will continue to lead the prime brokerage division post-acquisition, ensuring continuity in leadership and operations.

The integration of Hidden Road into Ripple’s ecosystem is poised to enhance the utility of Ripple’s U.S. dollar-pegged stablecoin, RLUSD. Hidden Road utilizes RLUSD as collateral across its prime brokerage products, a move that could position Ripple more competitively against established stablecoin providers like Tether and USD Coin.

This acquisition is part of Ripple’s broader strategy to leverage its substantial cash reserves for expansion. The company has been actively seeking opportunities to diversify its offerings and solidify its global presence. Garlinghouse has previously highlighted plans to invest in markets with favorable regulatory frameworks, such as the United Arab Emirates and Switzerland.

Prime Minister Narendra Modi inaugurated the New Pamban Bridge on April 6, 2025, in Tamil Nadu’s Ramanathapuram district. This 2.07-kilometre-long bridge, constructed at a cost of ₹550 crore, connects Rameswaram Island to the mainland, significantly improving regional connectivity.

The New Pamban Bridge is India’s first vertical lift sea bridge, featuring a 72.5-metre-long central span that can be raised to allow ships to pass through. This mechanism enables the central section to rise vertically to a height of 22 metres, facilitating smoother navigation through the Palk Strait.

Constructed parallel to the original Pamban Bridge, which was opened in 1914, the new structure stands three metres higher than its predecessor, providing a navigational air clearance of 22 metres above sea level. The bridge comprises 100 spans of 18.3 metres each and is designed to accommodate double railway tracks with electrification, allowing trains to operate at speeds up to 80 km/h.

The vertical lift span is operated by an electro-mechanical system integrated with train control mechanisms. This design allows the 660-tonne span to be lifted in approximately five minutes, minimizing disruption to rail services. The bridge’s substructure has been built to support future double-line electrification, enhancing its capacity and efficiency.

The original Pamban Bridge was closed in December 2022 due to safety concerns arising from its deteriorating condition. The new bridge’s design and construction aim to address these issues, offering a more robust and reliable link between the mainland and Rameswaram Island.

The inauguration of the New Pamban Bridge is expected to boost tourism and economic development in the region by providing a more efficient transportation link. The bridge’s advanced design and construction techniques reflect India’s growing expertise in infrastructure development.

The office segment, traditionally a significant recipient of PE funding, witnessed a substantial reduction in investments. In the first half of FY25, investments in office assets plummeted by 79%, contributing to an overall 4% decline in PE investments during this period. Shobhit Agarwal, Managing Director and CEO of ANAROCK Capital, noted that foreign investors, who predominantly drive office sector investments, have scaled back due to factors such as geopolitical tensions and elevated interest rates.

Conversely, the industrial and logistics sector emerged as a bright spot, capturing 67% of total PE investments in the first half of FY25. This surge was significantly bolstered by a landmark deal wherein Abu Dhabi Investment Authority and KKR invested USD 1.54 billion in Reliance Logistics and Warehouse Holdings’ assets across multiple locations. This transaction alone accounted for a substantial portion of the sector’s investment inflow during this period.

The residential segment also saw an uptick in PE interest, with its share rising to 17% in the first half of FY25, up from 8% in the same period the previous year. This increase reflects growing investor confidence in the residential market’s potential.

Despite the overall decline in PE investments, the average deal size has seen an upward trajectory. In the first nine months of FY25, the average deal size increased by 32.5%, reaching USD 117.3 million, compared to USD 88.5 million in the corresponding period of FY24. This rise underscores the impact of large-scale transactions on the market, with the top 10 deals comprising 93% of total PE transactions during this timeframe.

Foreign capital continues to play a dominant role in India’s real estate PE landscape, accounting for 87% of total investments in the first half of FY25. However, this represents a slight decrease from the previous fiscal year, where foreign investments constituted 76% of the total. The decline is indicative of the cautious approach adopted by foreign investors amid global economic challenges.

Vietnam’s economic growth has decelerated in the first quarter of 2025, coinciding with the United States’ imposition of a 46% countervailing tariff on Vietnamese exports. This development raises concerns about the nation’s export-driven economy and its future trajectory.

The newly enforced tariff is expected to significantly impact Vietnamese exports, potentially affecting goods worth up to $37.5 billion, which represents approximately 2% of the country’s GDP. Key sectors such as electronics, machinery, apparel, and footwear are anticipated to bear the brunt of these tariffs, leading to increased prices for American consumers and prompting multinational companies to reconsider their supply chain strategies.

The U.S. administration justifies the tariff by citing concerns over Vietnam’s alleged unfair trade practices and substantial trade surplus with the United States. The tariff is part of a broader strategy targeting several Asian manufacturing economies, with Vietnam facing one of the highest rates. Other affected countries include China , Thailand , Indonesia , and South Korea . Even traditional U.S. allies like Japan and Taiwan have been subjected to tariffs of 24% and 32%, respectively.

Industry experts warn that these tariffs could lead to higher prices and reduced product choices for U.S. consumers. Companies are now evaluating their global supply chains, with some considering shifting operations to countries like Mexico, Brazil, and India to mitigate the impact. However, large-scale relocation of labor-intensive industries to the United States remains unlikely due to high domestic labor costs and a shortage of skilled workers.

In response to the tariffs, Vietnam is exploring strategies to mitigate the economic impact. These include diversifying export markets, enhancing product quality, and leveraging existing free trade agreements such as the European Union-Vietnam Free Trade Agreement and the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership . By broadening its market reach and improving the investment climate, Vietnam aims to navigate the challenges posed by the U.S. tariffs and sustain its economic growth.

Cryptocurrency exchange FTX has disqualified approximately 392,000 customer claims after users failed to verify their identities by the March 3 deadline, potentially nullifying claims exceeding $2.5 billion. This action affects a substantial portion of creditors seeking restitution following FTX’s collapse in November 2022.

FTX creditor advocate Sunil Kavuri estimates that claims under $50,000, totaling around $655 million, and larger claims amounting to approximately $1.9 billion are subject to disqualification due to Know Your Customer violations. The KYC process, a standard compliance measure in the financial industry, requires users to provide personal identification information to prevent fraud and money laundering.

FTX’s bankruptcy proceedings have been complex and protracted. In October 2024, U.S. Bankruptcy Judge John Dorsey approved the company’s wind-down plan, allowing FTX to utilize up to $16.5 billion in recovered assets to fully repay customers. The plan prioritized customers with claims of $50,000 or less, aiming to reimburse 98% of such claimants within 60 days of the plan’s effective date.

The repayment process commenced on February 18, 2025, targeting the “convenience class” of creditors with claims under $50,000. Distributions were facilitated through cryptocurrency firms Kraken and BitGo, with customers expected to receive funds within one to three business days. FTX Recovery Trust Plan Administrator John J. Ray III acknowledged the significance of this milestone but emphasized the ongoing nature of recovery efforts.

The next phase of repayments is scheduled to begin on May 30, 2025, addressing larger claims exceeding $50,000. FTX has amassed an $11.4 billion cash reserve to fund these payments. Bankruptcy attorney Andrew Dietderich informed the court that while minor creditors have started receiving payments, the first distribution to major debt holders is set for late May.

Despite these efforts, some creditors have expressed dissatisfaction with the repayment terms. Concerns have been raised about reimbursements being based on cryptocurrency valuations from November 2022, when prices were significantly lower. For instance, Bitcoin was trading at approximately $16,000 during that period, compared to its current value exceeding $100,000. This discrepancy means that creditors might receive only 10–25% of their crypto’s current value.