News related to
currency

Texas Governor Greg Abbott has enacted Senate Bill 21, empowering the creation of the Texas Strategic Bitcoin Reserve, making it the third US state to legislate a formal Bitcoin reserve following Arizona and New Hampshire. For the first time among its peers, Texas will finance this dedicated fund with public money, distinguishing it from Arizona’s and New Hampshire’s models.

Under the terms of SB 21, the reserve will operate independently of Texas’s treasury and be managed by the Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts, guided by an advisory committee of crypto investment professionals. Only assets with an average market capitalisation exceeding US $500 billion over two years qualify for inclusion—Bitcoin currently stands alone in meeting that benchmark. The fund’s flexibility extends to growth through forks, airdrops, investment returns and public donations, with biennial public disclosures required.

Companion legislation, House Bill 4488, shields the reserve from routine transfer into the general revenue fund and ensures its legal continuity regardless of whether it holds Bitcoin by summer 2025. The Senate passed SB 21 by 25 votes to 5, and the House by 9 to 4; the law will take effect on 1 September 2025.

Proponents frame the reserve as a strategic hedge against inflation and economic volatility, aligning with Texas’s broader approach to diversify its assets. Senator Charles Schwertner, the bill’s author, observed that if the state can invest in gold or land, it should also have the option to invest in Bitcoin—“the best-performing asset of the last 10 years”.

Governor Abbott has been a vocal supporter of cryptocurrency integration, remarking last year that Texas was already home to crypto mining and “should become the crypto capital”. The inclusion of a state fund aligns with his pro-crypto stance and the passage of HB 4488, which he signed shortly after, enhances the law’s stability.

Texas’s approach diverges notably from Arizona and New Hampshire. Arizona’s law permits establishment of a reserve but prohibits spending public funds on asset purchases, whereas New Hampshire enables investment through the treasury—but neither allocates separate, publicly funded funds. By committing public funds and creating a segregated structure, Texas establishes a more robust and intentional framework.

Financial analysts and policymakers have reacted with a mixture of cautious interest and concern. While some view the move as a progressive diversification strategy, sceptics warn of Bitcoin’s price volatility and uncertain long-term value. Reports from the European Central Bank and ECB president have criticised similar shifts by US governments, saying they could undermine monetary sovereignty and disrupt digital euro initiatives. Meanwhile, a February 2025 University of Chicago economist survey found no consensus that borrowing to fund a crypto reserve would be beneficial.

Globally, the action has prompted varied governmental responses. Belarus has emphasised crypto mining; South Korea and Switzerland have explicitly rejected adding Bitcoin to central reserves, citing volatility; India has announced it is reassessing its crypto stance in light of global shifts.

The legislative milestone occurs amid mounting institutional interest in Bitcoin. Public companies such as MicroStrategy, Marathon Digital and Tesla continue to invest heavily, contributing to a surge in corporate holdings—more than 819,000 BTC held across 223 firms, representing nearly 3.9 per cent of total supply. Notable large-scale investments have included Paris-listed The Blockchain Group’s purchase of 182 BTC for US $19.6 million, and Nakamoto Holdings securing US $51.5 million via PIPE funding for further Bitcoin acquisitions.

Hackers claiming affiliation with Predatory Sparrow, possibly linked to Israel, have executed a cyber‑strike against Nobitex, Iran’s leading cryptocurrency exchange, erasing approximately $90 million worth of digital assets. The assault began in the early hours of 18 June 2025, when the group transferred diverse cryptocurrencies—including Bitcoin, Ethereum and Dogecoin—into vanishing crypto‑wallets designed without private keys, effectively “burning” the funds to send a deliberate political message.

Blockchain analytics firms, including Elliptic and TRM Labs, analysed the transactions and found the emptied addresses bore anti‑IRGC messages, confirming the operation was ideologically motivated rather than financially driven. Elliptic noted that the assets were moved into vanity addresses with embedded slogans denouncing the IRGC, and that the group leaking the funds would not retain the keys, ensuring permanent loss.

Noble objective remains politically charged

The group, using its Farsi‑named moniker Gonjeshke Darande—or “Predatory Sparrow”—publicly accused Nobitex of facilitating Iran’s sanctions evasion and funding militant groups, claiming the platform had enabled transactions for IRGC‑linked factions such as Hamas and Yemen’s Houthis. Elliptic has traced past ties between Nobitex and IRGC‑affiliated actors, including sanctioned individuals like Amir Hossein Niakeen Ravari and Ahmad Khatibi Aghada.

The hack comes amid heightened Israel‑Iran tensions. Reports indicate that Predatory Sparrow also targeted Iran’s state‑owned Bank Sepah on 17 June, triggering widespread service disruption, including to ATMs and fuel stations. Analysts interpret these cyber‑operations as extensions of conventional military retaliations between the two nations.

Nobitex disruptions raise alarm

Nobitex admitted to unauthorised access affecting both its app and website, temporarily shutting services while conducting assessments. Public updates from the exchange have been sparse, and customer inquiries have reportedly gone unanswered. Plans to recover or rebuild lost assets remain unclear, raising concerns among its claimed user base of over 7 million.

Despite accusations, Israel has not officially claimed responsibility. Media speculation within the country suggests government backing, but no formal confirmation has been issued. Predatory Sparrow, noted for previous impactful operations—from collapsing gas station networks in 2021 to prompting major fires at a steel mill in 2022—added this attack to its growing list of cyber engagements against Iranian infrastructure.

Impact and implications for crypto ecosystem

Cyber‑security analysts have labelled the hack “particularly significant given the comparatively modest size of Iran’s cryptocurrency market,” with Chainalysis intelligence chief Andrew Fierman underscoring the political overtones. The operation exemplifies how digital currencies and blockchain platforms are becoming tactical assets and vulnerabilities within geopolitical conflicts.

U.S. legislators, including Senators Elizabeth Warren and Angus King, previously raised concerns over Nobitex’s facilitation of sanctions avoidance, highlighting its role in enabling Iran’s IRGC and related proxies to move financial resources. This attack may intensify scrutiny on crypto exchanges suspected of abetting questionable transactions in sanctioned jurisdictions.

Decline of Iran’s crypto defences

Crypto adoption in Iran has long served as a hedge against economic instability, with citizens and state‑linked groups alike using digital currencies to escape inflationary pressures and circumvent banking restrictions. Nobitex, in particular, developed significant traction, drawing millions of users seeking alternative financial tools.

However, analysts warn this sabotage could erode investor trust, disrupt public confidence in digital assets, and invite heightened regulatory oversight. Exchanges in politically sensitive regions may now face new security standards and sanctions compliance demands.

A new frontier in cyber‑warfare

This development underlines a shift where cyber‑warfare transcends state boundaries, now targeting third‑party financial networks with tangible consequences. By obliterating rather than stealing funds, Predatory Sparrow signalled that its operation aimed to disrupt Iran’s crypto‑financing rather than profit from it.

Officials tracking these patterns warn that similar tactics may emerge as cyber‑tools of statecraft evolve, affecting financial systems across volatile regions. Experts suggest exchanges handling high‑risk jurisdictions should shore up defences and improve transparency around asset provenance and network resilience.

As Nobitex works to restore functionality, regulators, crypto stakeholders and intelligence services will closely examine the incident. The breach draws attention to the critical role of exchanges in global geopolitics, raising complex questions about neutrality, compliance and cybersecurity in an increasingly fraught digital economy.

Zurich-based 21Shares AG has extended its reach in the Nordic financial market by adding five cryptocurrency exchange-traded products to Nasdaq Stockholm, taking its total offerings on the Swedish exchange to ten. The newly cross-listed products—Uniswap, Avalanche, Bitcoin Gold, Solana Core Staking and Ethereum Core —join the firm’s existing Bitcoin, Ethereum, Solana, XRP and Bitcoin Core ETPs.

This move reflects mounting interest among both retail and institutional investors in regulated access to a broader range of digital assets via established trading venues. With the latest additions, 21Shares reinforces its position as a leading provider of physically backed, transparent crypto investment products in Europe.

Mandy Chiu, Head of Financial Product Development at 21Shares, highlighted that the expansion enables investors to craft more bespoke portfolios. “By offering a broader selection of single‑asset and thematic crypto ETPs, we’re empowering investors to build more customised and resilient portfolios through a familiar exchange environment,” she said. Nasdaq’s European ETF & ETP head, Helena Wedin, welcomed the new suite, noting such innovation as shaping the future of capital markets.

The newly listed ETPs offer exposure to distinct niches within the crypto ecosystem. AUNI provides a stake in Uniswap, the leading decentralised exchange. AVAX tracks Avalanche, a platform noted for its scalability. BOLD focuses on Bitcoin Gold—a fork designed to democratise mining. CSOL delivers both Solana price exposure and staking yield, while ETHC covers Ethereum’s core asset. These additions allow investors to target specific segments, from DeFi protocols to next‑generation blockchains and staking-enabled assets.

All 21Shares ETPs are physically collateralised and traded under regulated frameworks, removing the burden of wallet management and key custody. Fees range from 0.21% to 2.50% annually, offering a competitive alternative to direct crypto exchange transactions. The firm’s products are also listed on Euronext Paris, Amsterdam, London and SIX Swiss Exchange, contributing to a diversified pan-European presence.

This latest development comes as Europe prepares for implementation of the Markets in Crypto‑Assets Regulation, aimed at standardising crypto oversight. More listings on regulated exchanges help issuers align with the evolving regulatory landscape.

21Shares’ strategy compares with best-in-class players in traditional finance pushing crypto integration. From Bitcoin and Ethereum to platforms like Solana and Avalanche, the firm’s growing suite meets demand both for mainstream exposure and thematic investment strategies.

Despite these advances, some challenges persist. Liquidity conditions for less‑traded tokens such as Bitcoin Gold can be thin, and tracking discrepancies may emerge between product performance and spot prices. Fees, while competitive, can vary significantly: niche products may carry noticeably higher rates, impacting returns.

Nevertheless, for investors seeking regulated and familiar vehicles, the benefits are tangible. ETPs provide access through existing brokerages, transparency under established compliance standards and relief from the technical complexity of self-custody.

This expansion also underscores Nasdaq Stockholm’s evolving role as a hub for crypto‑linked financial instruments. Stockholm’s regulatory environment and market infrastructure make it attractive for issuers and investors alike. The increased product diversity enhances its appeal to both domestic and regional markets.

Beyond booming local interest, 21Shares continues to push forward globally. In the US, the firm is pursuing approvals for a suite of spot crypto exchange-traded funds—including for Solana, XRP, Dogecoin, Polkadot, and Sui—as it seeks to replicate its European success. Additionally, its ARK 21Shares Bitcoin ETF underwent a 3‑for‑1 stock split on 16 June to enhance accessibility.

Since launching the first physically backed crypto ETP in 2018, 21Shares has built a track record of innovation and adaptation. Backed by deep market expertise and proprietary custody systems, the company now manages approximately US $9.15 billion in assets under management. Leadership changes—including new CEO Russell Barlow—reflect an evolving operational structure focused on scalability.

FalconX, a leading cryptocurrency prime brokerage, has initiated informal talks with bankers and advisers to explore an initial public offering in 2025, signalling a significant move to satisfy burgeoning institutional demand for digital assets. The firm, which last raised $150 million in 2022 at an $8 billion valuation, is not yet retaining an underwriter—an early but strategic step toward going public.

Founded in 2018, FalconX began as a crypto-focused prime broker, enabling clients to trade directly on exchanges. Today it spans three verticals—markets, custody and staking, and direct market access prime brokerage—positioning itself as a full-spectrum financial services provider for institutional clients. This evolution reflects growing investor interest in digital assets and the firm’s expansion through deals and strategic integration.

In early 2025, FalconX acquired Arbelos Markets, marking its entry into the derivatives segment, a lucrative but highly competitive space. It also forges partnerships with established players such as Standard Chartered, integrating global banking and foreign-exchange capabilities, and with Cantor Fitzgerald, accessing a credit facility collateralised by Bitcoin—its “first step in a broader credit framework” to bolster institutional offerings.

The broader crypto sector is experiencing an IPO wave. Several digital-asset platforms, including Fold, Exodus and eToro, have listed in 2025. Notably, stablecoin issuer Circle achieved a landmark $1.1 billion IPO on 5 June, marking the largest crypto-market debut in history and fuelling expectations of further listings. Following Circle’s success, firms such as Bullish and Gemini filed for public listings, with Kraken and Justin Sun’s Tron Group also preparing filings.

Amid this sector-wide momentum, FalconX is working to enhance its public profile, seeking to craft a compelling narrative ahead of a potential IPO. The firm’s strategy, according to one insider, emphasises readiness to appeal to public-market investors, including both strategic partnerships and public relations positioning.

The firm’s track record underpins its IPO ambition. In June 2022, it secured a $150 million Series D led by Singapore’s GIC and B Capital at an $8 billion valuation. That round also involved Thoma Bravo, Wellington Management, Adams Street Partners and Tiger Global Management. CEO Raghu Yarlagadda emphasised FalconX’s market‑neutral model, rigorous risk‑management and profitability amid volatility—a rarity in the crypto space.

With over $430 million in capital raised to date, FalconX has demonstrated resilience, continuing to hire and expand services even as competitors retrench. GIC’s commitment and the firm’s strategic posture reflect stable investor confidence.

Institutional demand for crypto is rapidly growing, and FalconX’s moves align with this shift. The acquisition of Arbelos, banking collaboration and credit facility signal a broader ambition to integrate traditional and digital finance infrastructures, broaden offerings and close service gaps. As co-head of markets Joshua Lim observed, strategic partnerships and acquisitions enable FalconX to fill missing links that would otherwise force customers to assemble services piecemeal.

Within this context, launching an IPO emerges as both a capital‑raising tool and a visibility lever. As one adviser noted, “When you launch an IPO, you need to have a story…. You’re selling yourself to the investing public”. FalconX’s groundwork suggests readiness to craft that narrative, aligning with its strong financial position and strategic trajectory.

JD.com is preparing to deploy a regulated stablecoin through its Hong Kong arm as part of a significant expansion into digital payments. Its subsidiary, Jingdong Coinlink Technology Hong Kong, entered the Hong Kong Monetary Authority’s stablecoin sandbox in July 2024. The project is testing tokens pegged to the Hong Kong dollar and other major currencies, aiming for a wider rollout in the fourth quarter of 2025.

Tests performed by JD Coinlink have covered cross-border payment mechanisms, retail use cases—initially in JD Global’s Hong Kong and Macau markets—and investment applications on a public blockchain, ensuring transparency and regulatory compliance. JD is targeting integration across its extensive e-commerce ecosystem, including fast‑settling transactions for global trade, M&A deals, B2B settlements and consumer checkouts.

Richard Liu, JD’s founder and chairman, highlighted the company’s aim to secure stablecoin licences across major currency jurisdictions, citing the potential to cut cross‑border payment costs by up to 90 per cent and reduce settlement times to approximately 10 seconds. Liu underlined that once B2B applications prove viable, JD intends to broaden the stablecoin’s use to everyday consumer purchases within its platform.

The HKMA granted licences only to firms demonstrating robust risk controls and consumer protections. Under the Stablecoins Ordinance, which passed on 21 May 2025, issuers using or referencing the Hong Kong dollar must obtain formal approval and meet stringent obligations including reserve backing, redemption rights, transparent governance and segregation of client assets.

Jingdong Coinlink is complemented by parallel efforts to issue an offshore yuan stablecoin, though its launch hinges on regulatory authorisation from mainland authorities. This aligns with wider interest in the stablecoin market: Ant Group is also pursuing Hong Kong licences, and Western giants including JPMorgan, PayPal and Standard Chartered are racing to launch stablecoins.

Hong Kong’s regulatory clarity gives JD.com and its peers a regional advantage. The sandbox initiative, begun in March 2024, enabled live testing under HKMA supervision prior to licence application. With the Ordinance’s full force due on 1 August 2025, JD appears well aligned to capitalise on a rapidly evolving framework.

JD’s stablecoin will be issued on a public blockchain, enabling open verification of issuance volume and reserve data. CEO Liu Peng confirmed that the second phase of testing concluded in May, focusing on cross-border, retail and investment use cases. Assuming regulatory approval, licensing and integration plans are on track for Q4 2025.

These efforts form part of JD’s broader strategy to become a fintech powerhouse. The company recently expanded in food delivery and consumer finance, acknowledging a “lost” five‑year stretch of innovation. Its current push builds on JD’s in‑house blockchain infrastructure—Zhizhen Chain—which already facilitates roughly US $7 billion annually in supply‑chain finance.

Industry analysts observe that JD’s combination of logistics, e‑commerce reach and blockchain technology positions it uniquely among digital‑asset issuers. With nearly 600 million active users and operations spanning over 20 countries, the company could accelerate stablecoin adoption by integrating token payments into its merchant network.

As global stablecoin activity accelerates—fuelled by regulatory developments like the U.S. GENIUS Act and Hong Kong’s licensing framework—JD.com may emerge as one of Asia’s first large-scale retail-facing stablecoin providers.

Depending on its licensing trajectory, JD plans to list its stablecoin on regulated exchanges and deploy it on a public blockchain in Q4 2025. Beyond the HKD coin, the company is developing offshore yuan functionality, pending mainland approval.

Bitcoin has surged to command approximately 64 per cent of the global cryptocurrency market, a dominance level unseen since January 2021 and propelled by heavy institutional inflows following the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s approval of Bitcoin ETFs in January 2024. This increased dominance has coincided with a resurgence in confidence for Ethereum, which has seen its share climb from around 7.1 per cent in April to approximately 9.3 per cent today.

This shift marks a turning point in crypto capital flows. For many investors, Bitcoin remains the safe harbour amid global market volatility and rising macroeconomic uncertainty. According to the Financial Times, heightened Bitcoin dominance is underpinned by “heightened institutional investment,” with major hedge funds such as Millennium Management and Brevan Howard among top ETF holders. Smaller tokens have lost ground as smart money funnels into the more established and liquid assets.

Ethereum’s revival reflects this evolving dynamic. Once languishing with just over 7 per cent market share in April, it has rebounded to 9.3 per cent. Analysts attribute the rise to improving investor sentiment and increasing adoption of Ethereum-based applications. Technical indicators also support a bullish outlook: Ethereum’s market value has risen nearly 48 per cent over the past three months, compared to Bitcoin’s 31 per cent.

Chart patterns signal a potential inflection. Bitcoin dominance has encountered resistance at around 64–65 per cent, hinting at a possible reversal. Analysts such as “Astronomer” on social platforms point out that Bitcoin’s market share is approaching a critical ceiling and may soon recede—a shift that historically precedes renewed altcoin activity.

Investor behaviour appears to reflect this emerging balance. Spot Ethereum ETFs have attracted sustained inflows, with over US$1.3 billion entering ETH products across 19 consecutive days. Additionally, ‘smart money’ whale activity in ETH protocols indicates a strategic accumulation, even as retail traders step back. These large-scale holders are said to control nearly 27 per cent of the total ETH supply—an indication of growing institutional confidence.

Market analysts underscore that Bitcoin dominance near 64 per cent still keeps altcoins marginalised. Daan Crypto warns that unless Bitcoin dominance dips below this level, funds will remain weighted toward Bitcoin. The Altcoin Season Index—a metric tracking the performance of top altcoins relative to Bitcoin—currently sits in the 30s, suggesting a fading but not yet full-blown move into altcoins. Historically, a shift above 75 triggers more substantive altcoin rallies.

Nevertheless, proponents argue that liquidity rotation is underway. Ethereum’s rise is seen as the vanguard, often signalling broader market rotation into high-cap alternatives. As Maxwell Mutuma noted, “Altcoins have spent a good part of 2025 playing catch‑up…with Bitcoin’s dominance at 64 per cent, it’s certainly raised some concerns,” even as “Ethereum’s recent surge hints at a broader altcoin rotation”.

Despite current trends, caution remains. Analyst Severino has advised that although technical indicators support a pullback in Bitcoin’s dominance, any full-scale altcoin rally is not yet assured. He emphasises that meaningful declines below 62 per cent in Bitcoin dominance would be needed to confirm a structural shift in asset allocation.

Ethereum stands at the centre of this crossroads. With its market share approaching 9.3 per cent, ongoing technological updates such as the upcoming Pectra upgrade may reinforce investor confidence and drive further capital inflows.

The current scene paints a narrative of cautious optimism. Bitcoin remains firmly dominant, buoyed by institutional demand, but Ethereum’s resurgence signals that capital is beginning to trickle back into the altcoin space. Whether this marks the vanguard of a broader altcoin resurgence or simply a temporary reprieve will depend on whether Bitcoin dominance retreats from its 64 per cent plateau.

Lawmakers in Ohio’s House Technology and Innovation Committee have approved House Bill 116 — dubbed the “Bitcoin Rights” measure — with a unanimous 13‑0 vote. The legislation safeguards personal control over encrypted digital assets, explicitly legalises individual and corporate mining and node operation, and provides a state income‑tax break of up to US $200 per transaction in capital gains from digital assets.

The bill, formally titled the Ohio Blockchain Basics Act, moves to the full House for a vote as part of an initiative to position the state as a hub for blockchain and cryptocurrency operations.

At the heart of the measure is the protection of self‑custody rights, allowing citizens to keep their crypto in hardware or self‑hosted wallets without interference from state or local authorities. It also shields miners and node operators from regulatory burdens. Individuals may mine at home, in residential zones, and businesses may operate industrial‑scale mining farms where zoning rules permit. Additionally, digital‑asset activities such as mining, staking, token swaps and node‑running would not trigger money‑transmitter or investment licensing requirements.

Another key component is the $200 per transaction exclusion from Ohio state income tax on capital gains from digital assets used as payment. That threshold is set to rise annually with inflation, offering relief to small‑scale users and encouraging routine use of cryptocurrency in commerce. Local governments, including municipalities and charter counties, would also be barred from imposing their own taxes or fees on such transactions.

The legislative analysis explains that the bill prevents state or locality from prohibiting acceptance of crypto as payment or from confiscating hardware or wallets. In industrial zones, mining operations enjoy protections from discriminatory rezoning, though noise and zoning regulations still apply.

Proponents, including the bill’s primary sponsor, Representative Steve Demetriou, have framed the bill as a foundational move to foster technology innovation, champion financial autonomy and attract blockchain businesses to Ohio. The bipartisan, unanimous committee vote reflects broad political willingness to embed crypto‑friendly measures at state level.

Supporters argue Ohio will benefit economically by drawing in infrastructure investment and fostering public familiarity with digital assets — especially with enhanced legal certainty and tax incentives in place.

However, critics caution that the bill may leave regulatory gaps, presenting consumer‑protection and environmental challenges. Concerns have been raised over potential disregard for energy‑intensive mining’s impact on local power grids and carbon emissions. Others warn that dubbing activities like mining and staking as outside the scope of money‑transmitter laws could allow for unmonitored financial operations.

Industry experts and legal analysts note that the bill’s nuanced definitions — covering digital assets, hardware wallets, self‑hosted wallets, nodes and mining operations — constitute one of the more comprehensive legal frameworks for crypto in the US. Its allowance for pension funds to study digital‑asset ETF investment is also seen as a significant institutional development.

Under the bill, each state retirement system must submit a report within a year assessing the viability, advantages and risks of investing in digital‑asset ETFs, and offer recommendations to reduce exposure in case of such investments.

Should the full House and Senate pass the bill and the governor sign it, Ohio will rank among the most crypto‑welcoming states. Observers suggest that its balanced approach — mixing legal clarity, tax relief and targeted environmental zoning controls — may serve as a model for other jurisdictions exploring blockchain policy frameworks.

With the committee stage complete, attention now turns to the legislature’s upper chamber, where further amendments or debates may arise. Policy‑wonks will be watching for potential changes on environmental stipulations and consumer protections, as well as alterations to the tax‑exemption levels.

The U.S. Senate has enacted the GENIUS Act, the first-ever federal framework for regulating dollar‑pegged stablecoins, with a decisive 68–30 bipartisan vote on 17 June 2025. Eighteen Democrats joined Republicans in supporting the legislation, which now advances to the House and is expected to reshape Washington’s digital asset rules.

The bill mandates that stablecoin issuers back tokens with liquid assets such as U.S. Treasuries, require regular financial disclosures and adhere to anti‑money‑laundering measures. It grants banks the authority to issue stablecoins, while explicitly restricting executive branch officials and legislators from sharing in their profits—a direct response to concerns over conflicts of interest.

A surge in crypto-sector investment in political campaigns appears to have shifted momentum. Industry spending topped $119 million in support of pro‑crypto congressional candidates during the 2024 cycle. Lobbyists then intensified efforts to engage Democratic lawmakers, viewed as essential for reaching the 60-vote threshold in the evenly divided Senate.

Internal communications among Democratic operatives reveal strategic alignment with crypto backers. In a private group chat described in reporting by the Lever, coalition members acknowledged that, despite ethical concerns, opposing the industry would be “political suicide.” One member reportedly observed that any amendment targeting Trump‑family conflicts would be “DOA,” suggesting token amendments offered for optics rather than impact.

Legislators including Senator Elizabeth Warren have voiced misgivings, arguing that the bill inadequately shields consumers or addresses risks associated with big‑tech or foreign‑issued stablecoins. She contends it grants too much leeway to the likes of former President Donald Trump’s crypto ventures, such as the Trump memecoin and World Liberty Financial.

The crypto lobby’s efforts have extended beyond campaign funding to retention of influential political operatives. Coinbase, for instance, recently appointed veteran Democratic strategist David Plouffe to its advisory board, joining a roster of insiders from both parties. Observers note this reflects crypto’s emerging status as a “politically competitive” constituency.

The political dynamic has shifted decisively. As AP reports, Democrats are balancing distrust of Trump-linked crypto enterprises with newfound recognition of the sector’s electoral influence. Backing the GENIUS Act became for many a strategic necessity, notwithstanding deep ideological resistance to deregulation.

The Senate vote occurred amid broader legislative discussions. The CLARITY Act—aimed at clarifying agency jurisdiction across the SEC and CFTC—is under consideration in the House Financial Services Committee. Some lawmakers propose merging the stablecoin and authority-defining bills, though others caution it could delay the GENIUS Act’s passage.

Crypto industry leaders view the GENIUS Act as a critical precursor to more comprehensive legislation. Ledger’s Head of Global Policy, Seth Hertline, described the Senate’s action as “a political bellwether” for the sector’s broader legislative agenda.

The bill’s passage also intersects with Trump’s personal crypto interests. His family’s stablecoin projects have sparked accusations of profiteering and lobbying for relaxed oversight. Critics warn that current legislative safeguards fall short of preventing conflicts of interest.

The next phase lies in the House, where Republican leadership must reconcile the Senate’s GENIUS Act with its own STABLE Act or integrate it into broader regulatory plans. Some Republicans advocate adding provisions to limit central bank digital currency initiatives, though such measures may complicate Senate approval.

Major stablecoin issuers such as Tether and Circle —together controlling over $200 billion in supply—stand to gain regulatory clarity and legitimacy if the GENIUS Act becomes law. Recent moves by major corporates, including JPMorgan’s planned stablecoin on Coinbase’s Base chain and indications that Amazon and Walmart are exploring token issuance, signal growing private‑sector enthusiasm.

As the House deliberates, questions remain whether the Senate’s bipartisan vote marks the start of a fully fleshed-out U.S. crypto regulatory regime—or the culmination of a high-stakes battle between policy integrity and political pragmatism.

Thailand has authorised a five‑year exemption from capital gains tax for digital asset sales conducted through SEC‑licensed platforms, functioning from 1 January 2025 until 31 December 2029. The legislation aims to sharpen the country’s advantage in the regional crypto landscape by lowering investor costs and enticing increased trading activity.

Under the measure, individuals realising gains from digital assets via regulated exchanges will face zero capital gains tax throughout the five‑year window. Prior to this, profits were subject to personal income tax rates—reaching up to 35 per cent depending on annual earnings—alongside a 15 per cent withholding tax on gains from non‑licensed platforms. VAT on cryptocurrency trading had already been abolished as of 1 January 2024.

Analysts believe the tax holiday is designed to reinforce Thailand’s appeal in Southeast Asia’s intensely competitive digital asset territory. With exchanges like Bitkub and Binance vying for market share, and tourists soon enabled to use crypto‑linked credit cards for local spending, Thai policymakers are signalling a strong commitment to bolster innovation while preserving investor protections.

Officials from the Thai Securities and Exchange Commission stress that the exemption applies strictly to transactions performed on SEC‑approved exchanges. Revenues from crypto trades outside those platforms will not be covered and remain taxable. Licensed operators must continue observing related regulations: comprehensive transaction reporting, watch‑lists for suspicious activity, custody rules, and coordination with law‑enforcement as stipulated under the Digital Asset Business Law.

Investor responses so far have been mixed. Market participants report that some will likely postpone realising gains until the exemption period begins. One Bangkok‑based trader remarked that the tax relief “reduces effective cost by around 15 to 35 per cent depending on your income bracket,” reinforcing Thailand’s status as Asia’s most favourable crypto tax jurisdiction for the coming years.

Critics caution that the measure may disproportionately benefit higher‑earning investors while diluting future tax revenue. Government officials argue the policy forms part of a larger strategy to boost capital market reform, as evidenced by parallel legislative updates—including measures enabling tourists to spend crypto, supporting retail access to digital government bond tokens, and enhanced SEC authority over foreign exchanges operating domestically.

The incoming regulation also supplements Thailand’s earlier decisions to exempt crypto trading from VAT from January 2024, amend withholding tax rules for licensed platforms, and permit offsetting of capital losses against gains. Expectations are rising for further alignment of digital asset rules with traditional financial regulations, part of a broader financial modernisation initiative led by the Ministry of Finance and Bank of Thailand.

As the deadline for implementation approaches, licensed exchanges are working on upgrading systems to clearly segregate tax‑exempt transactions and produce compliant audit trails. The revenue department has indicated it will deploy random checks and compliance audits, with penalties ready for any lapses in record‑keeping or reporting.

With the exemption set to begin next year, attention has swiftly shifted to whether Thailand will extend or widen the tax holiday when 2030 nears, and whether parallel measures such as tax incentives for crypto firms, custody providers, or investment token offerings will be introduced. The current package already ranks among the most incentive‑heavy digital asset tax regimes globally, likely reshaping investor allocations in the short to medium term.

South Korea’s Seoul Southern District Court on 17 June acquitted Haru Invest CEO Lee Hyung‑soo of fraud charges linked to the collapse of withdrawal services that triggered investor losses of approximately $650 million. The court determined there was no deliberate intention to mislead the 6,000-plus affected depositors, citing legitimate business activity that merely suffered collapse from contagion stemming from the FTX collapse.

Prosecutors had alleged Lee orchestrated a $650 million fraud scheme by misleading investors and misappropriating user funds. They argued that the firm, owned by parent company Blockcrafters, presented itself as secure and sustainable before halting withdrawals in mid‑2023, inflicting financial hardship on users. Nonetheless, the court concluded that while Haru Invest’s model carried high risk, it was not inherently deceptive.

The court’s ruling also cleared the company’s co‑CEOs at Blockcrafters, who faced similar allegations. In contrast, Haru’s chief operating officer, Kang, received a two‑year prison sentence after being found guilty of embezzlement. The court determined Kang had transferred client funds to his personal accounts, a charge distinct from the fraud accusations directed at Lee and other executives.

Judges noted connections between Haru’s difficulties and the broader collapse of the cryptocurrency ecosystem following the FTX failure. They observed that Haru deployed a legitimate yield‑earning model using third‑party counterparties, including B&S Holdings, but that the sudden disruption in liquidity markets amplified losses. There was no evidence, the ruling held, that Lee intentionally misrepresented Haru’s operations or risk profile to investors.

Concurrently, prosecution testimonials during closing arguments revealed that Haru marketed its platform as capable of delivering annual interest rates exceeding 10 per cent on deposits of Bitcoin, Ethereum and USDT. Investor expectations were inflated, yet those losses, believed to be exacerbated by exposure to over‑leveraged counterparty relationships, were judged to result from systemic failure rather than criminal intent.

Throughout the proceedings the defence emphasised Lee’s commitment to asset return. Lee personally told the court that investors retained ownership of their crypto assets and that Haru operated legally under custody arrangements. He insisted that financial setbacks resulted from Bernard Bang’s mismanagement at B&S, a company entrusted with executing Haru’s yield‑earning strategy. The defence maintained that Haru’s abrupt withdrawal suspension in June 2023 was a reactive measure to liquidity pressure, not an attempt to defraud.

Meanwhile, the court confirmed that Kang, the COO, diverted funds into accounts unrelated to Haru’s operations, violating fiduciary responsibility, and meriting his conviction. His sentence reflected the separation in responsibility between him and senior management, who genuinely believed in and operated under a legitimate model.

The financial aftermath continues: Haru has appointed an insolvency administrator and launched a creditor claims process affecting thousands of both domestic and overseas investors. According to user‑submitted civil filings, the firm is pursuing recovery of assets tied to the FTX bankruptcy estate, including staking returns and counterparties’ restitution. Victims are filing asset‑recognition claims under Korean bankruptcy law, arguing that deposited tokens belong to them and should be returned outside Haru’s bankrupt estate.

In parallel, appellate proceedings are expected for Kang, whose sentence may be modified as his embezzlement involved funds beyond his legal authority. Lee and his co‑CEOs are also preparing appeals, emphasising that Haru’s structure and disclosures conformed with regulations at the time of operation.

Israeli Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich has ordered the cancellation of a decades‑long indemnity that shields Israeli banks when processing shekel transactions for Palestinian counterparts, a move poised to disrupt salaries, imports and basic services across the West Bank and Gaza.

The directive, issued on 10 June 2025, halts a waiver that permitted Israeli financial institutions to facilitate payments to the Palestinian Authority and local customers without fear of legal consequences. Analysts warn this could sever Palestinian banks’ vital access to the larger Israeli banking system.

Palestinian Monetary Authority officials cautioned that this severance would seriously impede operations such as payments for food, fuel, electricity and water. In 2023 alone, around 53 billion shekels—equivalent to $15.2 billion—passed through Palestinian banking corridors. The revocation of the indemnity risks plunging the territories into a fragile cash‑only system, heightening exposure to theft, fraud and illicit activity.

Smotrich’s decision follows sanctions by the UK, Canada, Australia, New Zealand and Norway imposing asset freezes and travel bans on him and National Security Minister Itamar Ben‑Gvir, citing their roles in incitement and human rights abuses in the West Bank and Gaza. Smotrich maintains the waiver withdrawal is a justified response to what he terms the Palestinian Authority’s “delegitimisation campaign” against Israel.

For decades, Palestinian banking operated without central‑bank autonomy or national currency. Reliance on Israeli shekels and correspondent banking agreements has been critical. International voices—including US Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen, G7 officials and the UN—have repeatedly warned that ending this arrangement could trigger a humanitarian crisis and violate international law.

Local analysts predict the measures will exacerbate an already deteriorating economic landscape. Kristin Ronzi of intelligence firm Rane Network said abolishing this financial collaboration will “impede the Palestinian Authority’s ability to import basic, essential goods such as food and fuel,” likely deepening economic hardship and undermining public sentiment.

The Palestinian banking system, which exceeds 100 % of GDP, is particularly vulnerable to spill‑over effects from Gaza into the West Bank, according to IMF data. The termination of the waiver is feared to amplify credit constraints on private and public sectors alike, risking reduced lending, increased borrowing costs, and even defaults.

International stakeholders, including the US and G7, had pressed for short‑term extensions of the indemnity. Those appeals often hinged on warnings that a collapse of Palestinian financial networks would destabilise trade, delay crucial services, and potentially fuel militant groups reliant on cash economies.

Smotrich is known for his hardline positions: he has previously withheld Israeli-tax clearance revenues and blocked aid in retaliation for moves supportive of Palestinian statehood. In May 2025, he warned publicly that Gaza “will be totally destroyed,” vowing to push Palestinians toward resettlement in other countries.

Within Israel, there is evident friction. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and some coalition members support Smotrich, but others fear political and economic backlash—particularly amid international outrage and concern over deepening the Gaza violence. The policy must still pass through Israel’s security cabinet before implementation begins.

Across Palestinian chambers in Ramallah and Gaza City, there is growing anxiety. Authorities are scrambling to negotiate with donors, international NGOs and Middle Eastern allies, in hopes of constructing contingency plans. Proposed measures include alternative cash corridors, increased use of digital currencies, and humanitarian exemptions—but none currently matches the scale of the existing system.

Economists warn the broader consequences of this rupture—the Palestinian economy has already lost billions amid conflict. Since October 2023, Gaza’s economy shrank by 61 %, the West Bank by 24 %, and joblessness soared to around 57 % across both territories. Analysts fear the banking clamp‑down could invert years of fragile recovery efforts, worsening poverty and political instability.

The United States Supreme Court has been asked to reconsider constitutional protections after the Internal Revenue Service obtained transaction records from more than 14,000 cryptocurrency users—including James Harper—without a warrant, under a sweeping “John Doe” summons aimed at Coinbase data. At issue is whether the longstanding third‑party doctrine—under which individuals forfeit Fourth Amendment privacy protections by sharing data with third parties—remains valid in the digital age.

James Harper, whose trading history dates back to 2013 and who reported all taxable gains, received notification in August 2019 that the IRS had secured his wallet and transaction data without any suspicion of wrongdoing. The agency extended its data collection to approximately 14,000 other users, sparking legal challenges in lower courts and culminating in the Supreme Court petition known as Harper v. Faulkender.

Supporters of Harper argue that the third‑party doctrine originated in a pre‑digital era, designed for narrow investigations, not mass data collection. In briefs filed on 13 June, the New Civil Liberties Alliance and Supreme Court litigator Kannon Shanmugam contended that individuals do not relinquish property or privacy rights simply by using digital platforms, and that warrant requirements should be reinstated for data access. Justice Sonia Sotomayor, in previous commentary, branded the doctrine “ill‑suited to the digital age,” a view echoed by other federal judges in the Fifth and Ninth Circuits.

In contrast, the IRS and its supporters argue that the doctrine is well‑established and necessary for effective tax enforcement, especially amid growing use of cryptocurrencies and concerns over under‑reporting. The agency says organisations like Coinbase have an obligation to furnish information when legal summonses are issued, even absent individual suspicion.

Lower courts have upheld the doctrine, dismissing Harper’s case. A district court in New Hampshire ruled that Harper lacked standing, while the First Circuit applied the third‑party doctrine in September 2024 to dismiss his Fourth Amendment claim. Now, the Supreme Court must decide whether to reverse these rulings.

Analysts suggest that a Supreme Court hearing—and eventual decision—could set a transformative legal precedent regarding digital privacy. If justices mandate search warrants under the Fourth Amendment before agencies can collect personal data—even from third parties—it would broaden protections for online financial activity and reshape the investigative landscape. Conversely, a decision upholding the status quo would affirm broad government access to digital records without judicial oversight.

The case aligns with broader judicial scrutiny over the balance between technological advancement and constitutional safeguards. As cryptocurrency adoption increases among individuals and businesses, questions loom over how traditional investigative powers should adapt. Critics fear that unchecked authority under the third‑party doctrine could pave the way for routine surveillance and erosion of civil liberties.

At the same time, law enforcement officials maintain that revised legal thresholds could complicate investigations into financial crimes and tax fraud. They argue that agencies need efficient access to data held by third-party institutions to detect under‑reported crypto gains and illicit transactions swiftly.

The Supreme Court’s decision on certiorari is expected this autumn. Should the Court agree to hear the case, oral arguments may follow early next year, offering a watershed moment for Fourth Amendment jurisprudence. The outcome will be watched by constitutional scholars, digital‑rights activists, regulators and the cryptocurrency industry.

As digital transactions become integral to everyday life, the Harper v. Faulkender decision may redefine the boundary between individual privacy and government authority. The Court’s ruling could determine whether the act of sharing financial data with a platform like Coinbase is equivalent to voluntary disclosure, or if it remains protected under constitutional standards requiring judicial oversight.

Grayscale Investments LLC is a fund in the USA market.
The price is 82.83 USD currently with a change of -1.33 USD from the previous close.
The latest trade time is Monday, June 16, 17:15:21 +0530.

Grayscale Expands Bitcoin Holdings with $1.05 B Investment

Grayscale Investments has acquired an additional 10,100 BTC, spending approximately $1.05 billion at an average rate of $104,080 per coin, boosting its total holdings to 592,100 BTC, with an average acquisition price of roughly $70,666 per coin. This move aligns with the firm’s year-to-date BTC return, which sits at 19.1 per cent.

The company now holds Bitcoin valued at approximately $41.84 billion, underpinning its reputation as one of the world’s largest institutional holders. Market watchers have noted that Grayscale’s significant expansion at this price point reflects confidence in Bitcoin’s current valuation and medium‑term outlook, even amidst broader cryptocurrency volatility.

This accumulation comes as institutional appetite for Bitcoin evolves. Grayscale, which transformed its Bitcoin Trust into a spot ETF via its GBTC product, continues to command a substantial fee structure—1.5 per cent—that supports yearly revenues exceeding $268 million, despite competitors offering cheaper options. The premium yield underscores its established presence and the loyalty of seasoned investors bound by legacy holds, tax considerations and brand trust.

Earlier this year, Grayscale launched the Bitcoin Mini Trust with a far lower fee of 0.15 per cent, explicitly targeting cost-sensitive investors. The mini‑trust currently holds around 43,572 BTC under management. Despite attracting inflows, its impact on Grayscale’s total AUM remains modest relative to the flagship GBTC.

Analysts suggest that Grayscale’s dual‑product strategy allows it to hedge against fee‑driven outflows while maintaining revenue through GBTC’s premium fee structure. Its sizeable Bitcoin accumulation adds weight to this approach. As one strategist remarked, institutional investors often exhibit inertia from legacy holdings and taxable events, making high‑fee products persistent revenue generators.

This latest purchase follows Grayscale’s broader pattern of capitalising on dips in Bitcoin price, reinforcing its average cost basis. With Bitcoin hovering near $105,000, this strategic buy expands holdings while keeping average cost significantly lower, positioning the firm favourably for market swings.

The acquisition also contrasts with broader market behaviour. Other institutions, particularly newer spot ETFs like those from BlackRock and Fidelity, have recorded substantial inflows thanks to much lower fees—commonly around 0.25 per cent—but display less aggressive accumulation strategies. Their collective AUM exceeds $100 billion, yet individually their daily volume and yields trail Grayscale’s monumental revenue draw.

Grayscale’s current average buy price—$70,666—reveals a long‑term investment horizon and deep conviction in Bitcoin’s trajectory. This cost average gives Grayscale a comfortable buffer versus price dips, which in turn sustains its willingness to deepen its position at current price levels. As volatility returns to crypto markets, Grayscale’s scale and cost discipline may offer smoother entry and exit tactics.

Market responses to the latest move have been mixed. Proponents argue that institutional accumulation of this magnitude is bullish for sentiment and price stability. Critics caution that such centralised concentration exposes Grayscale to regulatory and enterprise risk.

Regulatory scrutiny remains a key consideration. As one of the first and largest Bitcoin spot ETPs in the US, Grayscale continues to navigate evolving SEC policies, compliance obligations and heightened operational transparency. Its ability to sustain growth depends on navigating these frameworks while differentiating GBTC and BTC in a crowded ETF market.

Brazil has revoked its exemption for small-scale cryptocurrency gains, imposing a uniform 17.5% capital gains tax on all digital asset profits, effective from 12 June under Provisional Measure 1303. The measure replaces the previous tiered system—which allowed monthly tax-free crypto gains of up to R$35,000 and progressive rates of 15–22.5% for larger profits—and now applies to all holders, regardless of volume or wallet type.

The overhaul extends beyond exchange-traded assets to include self-custodied holdings and offshore crypto portfolios. Taxation occurs quarterly, with losses offsettable against gains over a rolling five-quarter period, although this allowance will narrow in 2026.

Smaller retail investors, previously shielded from taxes on modest gains, now face a significant shift. Under the old system, a casual trader earning R$30,000 in profits paid no tax; the new regime means a payable R$5,250—a leap from zero to 17.5%. Conversely, high-net-worth individuals stand to benefit: gains previously taxed at up to 22.5%—notably on trades above R$30 million—will now bear the lower flat rate.

This tax reform is part of a wider fiscal realignment aimed at broadening revenue sources. Previously untaxed fixed-income instruments like LCIs, LCAs, CRIs and CRAs are now subject to a 5% profit tax. Operators within online betting are also affected, with tax rates rising from 12% to 18%. The government had initially attempted to raise the IOF financial transaction tax, but withdrew following resistance.

The shift reflects Brazil’s position as Latin America’s largest crypto market, ranked among the world’s top ten in adoption. Government officials say the move is designed to simplify taxation, close loopholes—particularly for self-custody and offshore holdings—and treat crypto assets on par with traditional investments.

In March, Brazil’s Congress debated legislation to permit partial wage payments in Bitcoin, allowing up to 50% of salaries to be paid in crypto for domestic workers, and 100% for foreign contractors, under central bank supervision. While still under review, this bill indicates a dual approach: while levying stricter taxes, the state is also exploring broader integration of crypto into economic life.

Analysts suggest that while this latest policy may place increased pressure on small-scale traders, it could attract institutional investors seeking tax certainty. “Brazil now offers a clear, flat tax regime” for asset managers, said a financial strategist in São Paulo, referring to the capped 17.5% rate for large holdings.

Market observers caution, however, that the removal of tax-free gains may cool participation among casual investors, potentially reducing liquidity. With the reform’s full implementation and impact on compliance still unfolding, the crypto sector is bracing for a recalibration in trading dynamics.

Malé’s foreign exchange reserves have surged by more than $400 million, marking a notable strengthening of the nation’s external liquidity following a currency swap arrangement with the Reserve Bank of India. The Maldives Monetary Authority drew down the entire $400 million facility in October 2024, with the impact reflecting sharply in the country’s gross reserves, which rose to approximately $856 million by April 2025 from a low of $371 million earlier in the year.

Fitch Ratings has affirmed the Maldives’ Long‑Term Foreign‑Currency Issuer Default Rating at ‘CC’, citing the infusion from the RBI swap as a key factor in easing the country’s liquidity pressures. The agency also credited sustained tourism receipts and the implementation of the Foreign Currency Act, which compels tourism‑related businesses to convert a mandated portion of their monthly foreign‑currency revenues, for boosting reserves.

Despite the uplift in reserves, Fitch emphasised that gross holdings now cover just 1.5 months of external payments—well below the three‑and‑a‑half‑month median for comparable peers. Net reserves, after subtracting short‑term liabilities, remain critically thin at around $28 million. In its rating statement dated 12 June 2025, Fitch maintained the view that a sovereign default “remains a likely scenario within the foreseeable future” absent significant further support or reform.

The agency highlighted looming debt repayments of $688 million in the second half of 2025, rising to $1.1 billion in 2026, including bonds and sukuk. Policymakers in Malé are negotiating with external partners—including India, China, multilateral lenders and possibly the IMF—to secure deferments, fresh currency‑swap lines, or restructuring deals. Notwithstanding the swap, Fitch reiterated its concerns over persistent fiscal imbalance: the fiscal deficit is projected to widen to 14.5 per cent of GDP in 2025, public debt is set to reach 125 per cent of GDP by 2026, and important reforms—particularly in subsidy and healthcare spending—have been delayed on political grounds.

India formally welcomed the strengthening of Maldivian reserves, with the Indian High Commission in Malé posting on X that it “noted with satisfaction” the impact of the $400 million swap in easing external liquidity pressures. The move is part of broader bilateral economic cooperation anchored within the SAARC framework, signalling a continued role for India in supporting economic stability in Maldives.

Tourism continues to underpin the archipelago’s economy, with record visitor numbers bolstering inflows. Policymakers hope that the expansion of resort capacity and full operation of the new terminal at Velana International Airport will sustain growth and further cushion foreign currency earnings. Fitch projects GDP growth of around 4.8 per cent in 2025, increasing to 6.0 per cent in 2026 as tourism infrastructure develops.

The Foreign Currency Act, introduced last year as a fiscal measure, requires tourism businesses to sell at least 20 per cent of their monthly foreign exchange earnings to licensed banks. Separately, the MMA raised mandatory bank conversion thresholds from 60 per cent to 90 per cent, measures aimed at shoring up foreign‑exchange liquidity.

While the currency swap has delivered a temporary liquidity bridge, analysts caution that it falls short of addressing structural weaknesses. The MMA and government officials have underscored intentions to pursue fiscal consolidation and attract medium‑term financing. But Fitch has warned that absent sustained reserve accumulation, clear evidence of reform, and stronger fiscal discipline, the Maldives remains vulnerable to credit deterioration or a potential sovereign default.

India’s willingness to extend financial assistance underscores geopolitical and strategic interests. The inclusion of swap facilities, alongside ongoing debt negotiations with China and potential IMF engagement, may provide short‑term relief, but Maldives must improve its debt servicing capacity and rebuild buffers to avert future policy shocks.