News related to
global

Qatar has embarked on the printing stage of an ambitious architectural endeavour, deploying what are now the world’s largest 3D construction printers to build two public schools. Spearheaded by UCC Holding alongside the Public Works Authority, Ashghal, the project forms part of a broader plan to erect 14 new educational facilities under a public–private partnership, but these two structures alone span 40,000 m²—roughly 40 times larger than any previous 3D‑printed building worldwide.

Two custom-built BODXL printers supplied by Denmark’s COBOD each measure 50 m in length, 30 m in width and 15 m in height—dimensions comparable to a Boeing 737 hangar—making them the largest construction printers ever deployed. The twin schools, each covering 20,000 m² on 100 × 100 m plots, are two-storey edifices designed to showcase scalable, next-gen educational infrastructure.

Extensive preparatory work preceded the launch, including site development, printer assembly and more than 100 full‑scale test prints at a Doha-based trial site using a BOD2 printer. These trials refined concrete mix formulations suited to Qatar’s hot climate and developed bespoke nozzles to enhance precision. In May 2025, UCC engineers trained with COBOD specialists in print sequencing, structural layering and on‑site quality management, cementing Qatar’s local expertise in advanced construction technology.

The project offers clear environmental and operational benefits over conventional construction. By reducing raw material waste, lowering concrete consumption and cutting carbon emissions, 3D printing aligns with sustainable development goals. On‑site production cuts transport requirements and supply chain risk, while round‑the‑clock printing—including overnight operations—helps avoid thermal stress, minimises dust and noise and accelerates timelines.

Architectural design draws inspiration from Qatar’s landscape: sweeping, dune‑inspired curves are possible only through 3D printing’s geometric flexibility—a feat difficult and costly via traditional means. Scheduled to be completed by December 2025, the initiative is expected to redefine sustainable infrastructure while fortifying Qatar’s position as a global innovation hub.

Co‑founder of COBOD, Henrik Lund‑Nielsen, remarked that this marks both a technological milestone and an environmental turning point in building methodology. A spokesperson at UCC Holding said the venture “sets a global benchmark” in construction, as Qatar continues to drive pioneering engineering projects across the Gulf.

Stock markets across Asia plunged as global investors rushed to safe-haven assets following a military strike by Israel on Iran’s nuclear and ballistic missile facilities, intensifying geopolitical tensions in the Middle East. U.S. equity futures dropped sharply, while commodity prices surged—fuelled by fears of supply disruption and escalating conflict.

Crude oil futures reacted violently, with Brent surging about 9 % to approximately US $75.36 per barrel and West Texas Intermediate climbing to US $74.20, both marking the largest daily gains in months. Goldman strategists and energy analysts attributed the spike to risk premiums linked to potential retaliation and threats to regional infrastructure, especially across the Strait of Hormuz.

Precious metals and defensive currencies were also swept up in the panic. Spot gold rose by around 1.5 % to trade near US $3,434 per ounce, inching closer to its April record peak of US $3,500. The Swiss franc strengthened by roughly 0.4 % to reach two‑month highs against the U.S. dollar, while the yen appreciated by about 0.3 %—classic indicators of risk-off sentiment.

Asia’s leading equity indices suffered notable losses: Tokyo’s Nikkei 225 fell between 1.2 % and 1.4 %, Seoul’s Kospi dropped about 1.1 %, and Hong Kong’s Hang Seng declined roughly 0.8 %. U.S. S&P 500 E‑mini futures and Nasdaq futures plunged between 1.7 % and 1.8 %, while Pan‑European STOXX 50 futures slid around 1.6 %.

In India, the Nifty 50 and Sensex tumbled approximately 1.2 %, with the oil and gas sector leading losses thanks to narrower refining margins and soaring crude prices. Stocks of Bharat Petroleum, Indian Oil Corporation and HPCL each shed between 3.5 % and 6 %. Airline stocks, already shaken by a recent Air India crash near Ahmedabad, declined further as travel costs and uncertainty weighed heavily.

Debt markets saw a flight to quality. U.S. Treasury bonds rallied, pushing the 10‑year yield down to around 4.31–4.35 %, its lowest in a month. Currency markets mirrored these moves: the dollar index rose around 0.5 %, while the euro and sterling retreated slightly.

Analysts suggested the next moves hinge on Iran’s response. Charu Chanana, chief strategist at Saxo, noted that if tensions ignite, safe-haven demand and commodity volatility will likely persist. Matthew Haupt from Wilson Asset Management described this as a “classical risk‑off move,” adding that duration and scale of Tehran’s likely response will shape market impact.

This episode compounds earlier market strains. The global economy already faces headwinds from volatile U.S. trade policy and high inflation, while negotiations over Iran’s nuclear programme have stalled. A planned sixth round of talks in Oman was overshadowed as military actions overshadowed diplomacy.

Market indicators suggest traders are swiftly reducing risk exposure ahead of the weekend. Tony Sycamore from IG forecast continued selling in equities, saying that prudent investors will likely trim positions until further clarity emerges.

Energy market strategists warned of wider contagion. According to Saul Kavonic of MST Marquee, unless Iran specifically targets major oil infrastructure, supply impact remains limited—but persistent unrest could be enough to constrain output and flow through the region.

Brussels has moved to recalibrate its anti-money laundering framework with a significant update to its high‑risk third‑country list. The European Commission has put forward a delegated regulation that, pending a one-month scrutiny by the European Parliament and member states, would remove the United Arab Emirates from the bloc’s “high‑risk” list under the Fourth Anti‑Money Laundering Directive. Simultaneously, Algeria and Lebanon—alongside eight others—will be newly classified as jurisdictions with “strategic deficiencies” in their national AML and counter‑terrorism financing frameworks.

The UAE, delisted in tandem with Barbados, Gibraltar, Jamaica, Panama, the Philippines, Senegal and Uganda, has undergone a sequence of reforms aimed at strengthening judicial oversight, regulatory compliance, and enforcement against illicit financial flows. Its exit from the FATF’s grey list in February 2024 marked the start of a broader crackdown that included the creation of specialised courts for financial crimes and a succession of heavy penalties—most recently, a ₫3.3 million fine imposed by the Central Bank on multiple currency exchange houses for compliance violations.

In Brussels, Commissioner Maria Luís Albuquerque emphasised that the overhaul aligns with global standards and is based on rigorous evaluations involving FATF findings, bilateral dialogues and onsite assessments. The process reflects a broader ambition to shore up the integrity of Europe’s financial system by enforcing transparency and curbing illicit financial flows.

The inclusion of Algeria, Lebanon, Angola, Côte d’Ivoire, Kenya, Laos, Monaco, Namibia, Nepal and Venezuela signals rising concern about governance standards in these jurisdictions. Algeria’s entry follows high-profile anti-corruption prosecutions and its low standing in Transparency International’s Corruption Perceptions Index. Lebanon’s designation reflects ongoing socioeconomic volatility and persistent finance networks linked to non-state armed actors.

Monaco, already on the FATF grey list since mid‑2024, was also added to the EU’s high‑risk list despite its recent enhancements to its financial intelligence unit and AML supervisor. The Commission acknowledged its progress while noting unresolved weaknesses.

The dynamics surrounding the UAE’s delisting, however, are not without controversy. Previously, the European Parliament blocked the move, echoing concerns voiced by Transparency International, citing insufficient progress. Opposition is noted to persist among MEPs, particularly from Spain and its stance on Gibraltar, complicating consensus.

From an economic standpoint, the delistings carry tangible incentives. Banks and financial institutions across the EU will scale back enhanced due diligence on transactions linked to the UAE, reducing compliance burdens and speeding up capital flows. Analysts suggest this could enhance foreign investment, signalling confidence in the UAE’s reputation as a global financial hub and factoring into ongoing free-trade negotiations with the EU.

Despite the acknowledged legislative reforms in the UAE, dissent persists. German Green MEP Rasmus Andresen criticised the move as premature, warning that regulatory gaps remain that could be exploited for illicit financial activities. Commission spokespersons framed the update as technical, decoupled from trade ambitions, though the timing follows the launch of EU–UAE trade negotiations in April.

On the other side, proponents speak of a “reputational course correction” for the UAE, part of a sweeping strategy since 2022 that included legislative overhauls, enforcement operations and judicial mechanisms to reinforce compliance with FATF standards.

Should no objections arise during the legislative review, the updated list will come into force in late July. Transaction oversight requirements across EU financial institutions will adjust accordingly, with the UAE reclassified and new protocols applying to the newly added jurisdictions.

Dubai Land Department’s second tokenised property offering was fully subscribed in just one minute and 58 seconds, marking the fastest-ever blockchain-backed real estate transaction globally. The project, made available through the PRYPCO Mint platform, attracted 149 investors across 35 nationalities, while more than 10,700 others joined a waitlist to participate. The speed of uptake underscores growing trust in digital property ownership within the emirate’s broader Property Tokenization Initiative.

The feature property—a one‑bedroom apartment in Kensington Waters on Mohammed Bin Rashid City—was valued at AED 1.5 million, discounted from an estimated AED 1.875 million. Fractional ownership began at AED 2,000, enabling micro‑investing in prime Dubai real estate. This landmark offering followed an inaugural tokenisation in May 2025, which sold out within 24 hours, suggesting escalating global appetite for fractional property investments.

PRYPCO Mint is jointly operated by the Dubai Land Department and PRYPCO, under a regulatory framework accredited by the Virtual Asset Regulatory Authority, the UAE Central Bank, and Dubai Future Foundation within the Real Estate Sandbox initiative. The blockchain infrastructure is built by Ctrl Alt on the XRP Ledger and supported by Zand Digital Bank, ensuring tokens align with official title deeds.

Market data indicates robust momentum behind this pivot to tokenisation. In May, Dubai recorded total real estate sales of AED 66.8 billion, a 44 per cent increase year-on-year. The surge was driven by a 314 per cent rise in primary sales, with experts citing tokenisation as a catalyst for further growth. Scott Thiel, CEO of Tokinvest, observed that “tokenisation will not just accompany the next record, we believe, it will help drive it,” signalling strong confidence in the emerging asset class.

Dubai’s roadmap for tokenised real estate charts transformative ambitions. The DLD estimates that by 2033 tokenised assets could account for 7 per cent of the city’s total real estate market—equivalent to roughly US$16 billion. The first offering had drawn 224 investors from over 40 countries, with certificates of ownership now logged on the blockchain to ensure legal validity.

Industry insiders have noted the implications across the investment ecosystem. Zaher El Orm, a blockchain advocate in Dubai, commented that the asset “sold out in less than two minutes … with an average investment of around AED 10,000, a clear demonstration of the market’s appetite for on‑chain, fractional property investment,” adding that title certifications were issued within hours.

Earlier in the year, DAMAC Group—one of the UAE’s major developers—agreed to tokenize its assets worth US$1 billion via the MANTRA platform, reinforcing Dubai’s ambition to become a global digital assets hub. This aligns with regulatory updates from VARA in May extending tokenisation frameworks to real-world assets, bolstering transparency and operational efficiency.

Dubai Land Department and PRYPCO are now preparing to expand PRYPCO Mint’s offerings, encouraging investors to register early. Future phases aim to include international participants and onboard additional developers, scaling the initiative beyond its pilot phase.

Tokenisation is reshaping Dubai’s real estate landscape. By lowering barriers to entry, increasing liquidity, and embedding ownership in blockchain-secured records, Dubai is forging a path toward a digitally enabled property market that caters to both local and global investors. As the platform extends its reach, tokenised offerings may soon become a mainstream vehicle for property investment.

Kyiv’s parliament has introduced draft Bill 13356, empowering the National Bank of Ukraine to incorporate virtual assets—primarily Bitcoin—into its official gold and foreign-exchange reserves. The legislation would not compel the central bank to adopt such assets, but merely grant it the legal framework to do so.

Lead author Yaroslav Zheleznyak, first deputy chair of the Rada’s Finance Committee, highlighted that the bank would retain full discretion over timing, volume, and methodology of any crypto acquisitions. He described the measure as a pivotal move to “integrate Ukraine into global financial innovations” and bolster macroeconomic resilience while catalysing the digital economy.

Ukraine currently holds approximately 46,351 BTC—valued at over $5 billion—though these holdings originate from asset seizures, donations, and fundraising during wartime, and remain under civil-servant control rather than central-bank custody. If passed, the law would permit the bank to transition some of those coins into officially recognised reserves.

The proposal mirrors a broader trend: several nations are charting similar initiatives. The United States launched a Strategic Bitcoin Reserve under an executive order issued on 6 March by former President Trump, consolidating government‑owned cryptos into a national asset. Pakistan, Brazil and the Czech Republic are exploring mechanisms to incorporate digital assets into sovereign financial systems. El Salvador, which adopted Bitcoin as legal tender in 2021, holds over 6,000 BTC, while Bhutan maintains mining‑powered reserves worth around $750 million.

Yet the move is not without detractors. Critics emphasise Bitcoin’s volatility, liquidity constraints and concentration within corporate entities like MicroStrategy, which undermine its suitability as a stable reserve asset. The Swiss National Bank’s governor, Martin Schlegel, reaffirmed this stance on 25 April in Bern, warning that crypto lacks the stability and liquidity required for central‑bank reserve portfolios. ECB President Christine Lagarde has echoed similar concerns, stating that digital assets do not meet the criteria for eurozone reserve holdings.

Proponents argue that strategic inclusion could buffer Ukraine against inflation and currency devaluation, offering rapid, secure transferability unmatched by physical assets. Zheleznyak’s Telegram statement emphasised that implementation would be fully at the central bank’s professional discretion.

Operationalising the proposal will require establishing robust legal and procedural frameworks: anti‑money‑laundering protocols, cybersecurity safeguards, digital custody infrastructure, and accounting mechanisms. Banking analysts suggest that careful integration and risk management will be essential to balance innovation with financial stability.

Ukraine’s draft arrives amid growing global debate on digital money. Central bank digital currencies are being piloted worldwide, such as Turkey’s digital lira, China’s e‑renminbi, and Nigeria’s e‑Naira. Meanwhile, debates continue over whether public‑sector balance sheets should venture into decentralised finance or maintain traditional gold‑forex portfolios.

As parliamentarians prepare to debate Bill 13356, attention will turn to amendments that might specify asset types, risk parameters, and accounting standards—or narrow discretionary power for the central bank. The legislation must also align with IMF frameworks and comply with anti‑money‑laundering regulations.

Donald Trump has declared on social media that the United States and China have finalised a trade agreement, pending formal sign-off from both himself and Chinese President Xi Jinping. The accord ensures China will supply rare earth minerals and magnets “up front” to the U.S., while the U.S. will honour its commitments, including allowing Chinese students to study at American universities. Trump also highlighted a tariff arrangement favouring the U.S., imposing a total of 55 per cent, against China’s 10 per cent.

Negotiators in London laid the groundwork for this framework during two days of discussions aimed at restoring the Geneva truce first reached in May, which had faltered amid export restrictions on critical minerals. U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick described the outcome as putting “meat on the bones” of the Geneva agreement by addressing China’s curbs on rare earths and magnets. Both governments intend to present the framework for approval by Trump and Xi.

China controls a significant share of the world’s rare earth minerals, essential for manufacturing electronics, electric vehicles and defence technologies. Export licences recently granted to Chinese firms meeting U.S. demand reinforce China’s commitment to the agreement. The shortage of these minerals had previously disrupted global supply chains and limited U.S. access to critical components.

Alongside rare earth supplies, the agreement addresses educational exchanges by reaffirming that Chinese students will continue to access American universities. Trump emphasised this pledge in his social media announcement. Although the U.S. has criticised visas for students in sensitive fields, the deal appears to restore earlier norms.

Trump presented the tariff structure as a win for American interests: 55 per cent U.S. tariffs versus 10 per cent Chinese tariffs. These adjustments mark a shift from the extreme tariff stances of earlier this year, which had peaked at triple-digit levels.

Stock markets responded cautiously to the news: global indices displayed measured optimism as investors awaited details and official approvals. Analysts warned that markets remain fragile, with movement dependent on implementation and trust between the two nations.

Beijing’s participation was led by Vice Premier He Lifeng and Commerce Minister Wang Wentao, who conveyed the deal as a balanced step toward reviving the Geneva pact. The U.S. delegation included Commerce Secretary Lutnick, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, and Trade Representative Jamieson Greer. President Trump and President Xi had previously spoken by telephone on 5 June, building momentum for these discussions.

Despite this progress, experts caution that deep-seated mistrust and unresolved disputes remain. Non‑tariff barriers, such as technology export restrictions and visa policies, continue to loom. Chinese officials emphasised the deal’s provisional nature, awaiting “balanced” steps by both sides.

Analyst Ian Bremmer of Eurasia Group observed that while restarting the Geneva truce is a step up from breakdown, achieving a durable U.S.-China trade relationship will require sustained engagement and policy alignment. The role of rare earths as leverage underscores China’s global strategic advantage.

President Trump signalled confidence that approval could occur swiftly: Lutnick suggested sign-off might happen within days, as early as Wednesday or Thursday, after which implementation could begin. However, both governments have set a firm deadline of 10 August to negotiate a broader accord, before tariffs revert to higher levels.

With economic growth at risk from disrupted supply chains and tense trade anomalies, both the White House and Beijing face pressure to deliver tangible results. The World Bank recently warned that heightened tariff uncertainty could drag down global growth to an estimated 2.3 per cent in 2025.

While the deal hasn’t resolved core security‑driven trade issues—such as semiconductor and aviation export controls—it marks a notable thaw in tensions. Trump labelled his relationship with Xi as “excellent”, while both leaders exchanged invitations for state visits, signalling a diplomatic openness that has been absent from U.S.-China relations.