News related to
Ardi

A deepening rift between Iran and international nuclear inspectors marks a turning point in Tehran’s approach to its atomic programme and signals a complex challenge for global diplomacy. Iran has formally suspended cooperation with the International Atomic Energy Agency, severing communication channels and obstructing inspections, in the wake of U.S. and Israeli military strikes on its nuclear sites.

The move was set in motion on 23 June when Iran’s parliamentary national security committee approved a framework for halting camera installation, inspections, and reporting to the IAEA unless the “security of nuclear facilities is guaranteed”. The legislation was ratified by the Guardian Council on 26 June and now awaits signature from President Masoud Pezeshkian. Parliamentary speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf justified the step, stating that cooperation should resume only when IAEA activity ceases to endanger facilities.

Iran has since implemented the decision, reportedly blocking emergency channel calls from the IAEA’s Vienna headquarters. According to a Bloomberg report, once the Incident and Emergency Centre had been in sustained dialogue since 13 June, communication has now dwindled to silence.

The suspension has intensified global worry over what happened at Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan nuclear sites that were struck in late June by U.S. and Israeli forces. Satellite imagery indicates significant damage, and the UN nuclear chief Rafael Grossi described the destruction as “enormous”, stating that centrifuges at Fordow are no longer operational. Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei dismissed the strikes as theatrics, displaying defiance in his first address since a ceasefire with Israel, while the IAEA has received no formal notification from Tehran about the halt.

Inspectors face a dual challenge: assessing bomb damage and reconciling it with actual uranium stockpiles. Reuters reports that uncovering whether enriched uranium was destroyed, buried in debris or clandestinely moved will be “long and arduous”. IAEA chief Grossi noted Iran informed him on 13 June it had taken measures to protect nuclear materials — raising the possibility that uranium was relocated before the bombings.

A senior diplomat cautioned that verifying the fate of enriched stocks will require extended forensic and environmental analysis. Analysts highlight that these uncertainties, coupled with Iran’s growing 60 percent enriched uranium stockpile — now surpassed 400 kg — raise proliferation concerns. Iran stands as the only non-nuclear-weapons state to produce such highly enriched material.

The crisis threatens to undermine the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty. Experts warn that Iran’s rejection of oversight and potential expansion of enrichment capabilities could erode confidence in international safeguards and spark similar behaviour in other states.

Tehran counters that it remains compliant with its obligations, defending the withdrawal as a sovereignty measure and accusing the IAEA of complicity in aggression. Russian foreign minister Sergey Lavrov urged Iran to maintain IAEA cooperation. German officials echoed this sentiment, appealing for de-escalation and finer calibration.

U.S. and Israeli intelligence contend the strikes brought Iran’s enrichment efforts to a standstill, yet stop short of describing them as complete obliteration. Donald Trump claimed the attacks eliminated any need for a new nuclear deal, yet leaked U.S. intelligence suggests only a short-term delay of a few months.

Disruption of IAEA activities follows a pattern of mounting distrust. The agency censure on 12 June marked the first formal finding of non-compliance by Iran in two decades. Tehran subsequently announced expansion of enrichment infrastructure, including a third site and advanced centrifuges.

This standoff adds complexity to diplomatic efforts. Indirect U.S.–Iran negotiations held from April to June in Oman and Rome collapsed when Israel struck nuclear facilities on 13 June. Although Washington has signalled readiness to resume dialogue, Iran’s decision to suspend IAEA cooperation adds another layer of mistrust.

The prospect of tracking uranium movements amid top-secret relocation efforts, inaccessible bombed sites, and blocked communications has created a labyrinthine challenge. Inspectors and intelligence agencies alike face a “cat-and-mouse” hunt for clarity in rubble and uncertainty. Continued monitoring and a potential return to diplomatic channels will be vital in determining whether the inspection suspension is temporary or signals a more fundamental shift in Iran’s nuclear stance.

The Securities and Exchange Commission is developing a standardised framework that would allow token-based exchange-traded funds to list directly on exchanges, without requiring individual Rule 19b‑4 filings. The initiative, still in early stages, would set eligibility criteria—such as specific thresholds for market capitalisation, trading volume and liquidity—to determine which tokens qualify for streamlined launches.

This approach echoes previous SEC moves: in 2016, actively managed ETFs gained generic listing access under Rule 19b‑4, bypassing lengthy approval processes. Exchanges such as NYSE, Nasdaq and Cboe laid the groundwork by integrating uniform listing standards for index-based and active ETFs, paving the way for this token-focused evolution.

In May, Nasdaq formally proposed Rule 5703 to facilitate generic listing of multi-class ETFs, provided they align with Rule 6c‑11 and relevant exemption orders—allowing shares to debut without SEC review per fund. Similarly, Cboe sought generic listing permission for commodity-based ETFs to enable immediate options trading once criteria are met. The current SEC effort extends that logic to the burgeoning field of digital asset tokens.

Nasdaq has suggested the SEC adopt consistent standards for spot crypto ETPs under the 1933 Act, arguing that futures-based equivalents have already benefited from generic listing systems. This dovetails with mounting interest in regulated spot token funds, evidenced by amendments to listings such as Solana ETFs by issuers including 21Shares and Bitwise.

Under the envisaged standard, exchanges would apply objective, measurable thresholds—minimum market cap, daily volume and liquidity—to lists of token ETPs. Meeting these thresholds would allow issuers to bypass the full Rule 19b‑4 paperwork and associated months-long wait. Exchanges would retain responsibility for ongoing surveillance, as required by Section 19b‑4, ensuring investor protection and market integrity.

Stakeholders believe the move could vastly reduce time-to-market and cut legal and administrative costs. Industry analysts have highlighted that current Rule 19b‑4 reviews often delay ETF launches by months, even years. Exchanges argue that objectively defined generic standards provide predictability and efficiency—benefits that appear essential in digital asset markets known for rapid innovation.

Critics caution, however, that token assets may present unique compliance and market-risk considerations. Spot crypto markets, for instance, remain vulnerable to manipulation, price fragmentation and regulatory uncertainty. Ensuring adequate surveillance and governance, they warn, is material to the standard’s success.

To address this, exchanges plan to build in monitoring mechanisms, adaptation of surveillance regimes, and safeguards to delist or suspend tokens that fail to maintain standards. Similar models have been applied to options on commodity ETFs and multi-class ETF shares, suggesting a tested regulatory infrastructure.

The SEC’s token-ETF framework is likely to include consultation with market participants and exchanges, incorporating feedback from recent proposals such as Nasdaq’s push for spot crypto ETP generic listing. Legal advisors emphasise the importance of clear, data-driven criteria to withstand Rule 19b‑4’s statutory requirement for investor protection.

Key players expected to benefit include token issuers, established asset managers entering crypto, and intermediaries seeking to offer exchange-traded token exposure. Streamlined listing could also encourage institutional investors to enter the token market with confidence, potentially increasing adoption and liquidity.

Within the regulatory community, observers note that the SEC is mindful of its 2024 approval of spot Ether ETFs via individual 19b‑4 forms; a broader listing standard could expand this success to a wider array of digital assets. Meanwhile, pending amendments relating to token staking in ETFs—such as those Cboe filed in March—underscore the growing diversity within crypto-linked products.

As deliberations progress, industry and legal experts are analysing possible criteria thresholds, surveillance protocols, and whether the framework will initially apply only to spot token ETPs or extend to futures and hybrid products. Exchanges appear to favour a phased approach, beginning with established tokens that already meet basic listing requirements.

Saudi Arabia’s Public Investment Fund posted a 60 per cent plunge in net profit for 2024, even as its assets surpassed the US $1 trillion mark, the fund disclosed on 30 June. The drop came amid persistent high interest rates, inflationary pressures, and a wave of impairments tied to escalated costs and shifting operational plans.

Net income dwindled to 25.8 billion riyals, down sharply from 64.4 billion riyals in the prior year. This contrast underscored the divergence between headline growth and bottom‑line volatility within Saudi Arabia’s principal engine for economic diversification.

Assets under management rose by 18 per cent to 4.321 trillion riyals, up from 3.664 trillion riyals in 2023. The surge came largely from fresh capital injections, including transfers from oil‑linked revenues, plus appreciation in existing holdings, particularly in domestic champions such as Saudi Aramco and Saudi National Bank.

Yet, comprehensive income—an accounting measure that factors in unrealised gains and asset revaluations—tipped into negative territory, registering a 140 billion riyals loss following a gain of 138.1 billion riyals the previous year. The swing reflected deep writedowns, tied to project revaluations across the PIF’s footprint.

Monica Malik, chief economist at Abu Dhabi Commercial Bank, attributed the downturn in part to recalibration of investment strategies. She highlighted how “prioritisation of some projects and the extension in the timelines of some giga projects could have been a factor for the impairments,” and pointed to rising costs as another pressure point.

Among these giga‑projects is NEOM, an ambitious urban megacity on Saudi’s Red Sea coast. Backed by hundreds of billions of dollars in PIF funding, NEOM remains central to the fund’s strategy, though its scale and timeline have been under increased scrutiny amid cost inflation and changing economic dynamics.

Cash reserves stood firm at 316 billion riyals, while group loans edged up to 570 billion riyals, signalling ongoing borrowing to propel expansions. This reflects PIF’s dual posture: aggressive investment on one hand, and debt financing on the other.

Historically, PIF has been pivotal to Saudi Arabia’s Vision 2030 programme—Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman’s blueprint to reduce national dependence on oil by building world‑class tourism, tech and renewable sectors. Since 2015, the fund’s remit expanded from passive equity holdings to sovereign‑directed mega‑investments. By end‑2024, PIF had amassed over US $1 trillion in assets, bolstered by successive Aramco asset transfers.

Its investment portfolio spans global holdings—Uber, Boeing, Disney—and domestic ventures like Qiddiya, the Red Sea luxury resort and NEOM. The fund also pursued high‑profile investments, including planned stakes in Heathrow Airport and European hotel chains. Overseeing this expansion has drawn both political and governance scrutiny, reflecting complex trade‑offs under Saudi rules.

Despite today’s profit contraction, the growth in assets cements the fund’s scale and influence. Dividends from Aramco and SNB now fuel a substantial portion of PIF’s recurring income, augmenting returns from non‑oil investments.

The portfolio writedowns—particularly impairments linked to escalated project outlays—underline broader macroeconomic challenges. High global interest rates have upped the cost of capital for long‑gestating developments, while inflation has pushed construction, labour and materials costs upward. PIF’s balance sheet has borne both pressures.

Operating amid this headwind, the fund has begun recalibrating timelines and reprioritising capital deployment. Malik’s comments suggest PIF faces a complex balancing act: stewarding mega‑projects while preserving fiscal discipline. Illiquidity risk, rising debt and market exposure also feature in ongoing risk assessments.

In parallel, PIF is broadening its footprint via bond issuances and global partnerships. According to finance industry disclosures, it is preparing a seven‑year sukuk targeting US $1.25 billion in proceeds. Such moves signal evolving financing strategies that complement traditional government funding and cash reserves.

Central to this outlook is Vision 2030. Despite the profit slump, PIF retains its mandate to catalyse non‑oil economic sectors, from tourism to tech to renewable energy. Arab regional peers have pursued similar diversification, but few match PIF’s scale. The fund’s willingness to shoulder large‑scale writedowns may reflect long‑term thinking: strategic build‑out today, stabilised returns in future decades.

Global investors and markets will likely watch upcoming quarterly and full‑year data for signs of recovery or further calibrations. Rising global interest rates remain a wildcard. Additionally, cost overruns in mega‑projects may prompt sharper scrutiny and public debate about deliverables.

PIF’s holding company, chaired by the Crown Prince, retains political backing, but governance observers continue to emphasise improved transparency and oversight. The fund’s decisions now carry wider implications: not just for returns, but as a barometer for Saudi Arabia’s Long‑Term economic strategy.

Coinbase, headquartered in the United States, has secured a place among Time Magazine’s 100 Most Influential Companies of 2025, hailed for reshaping the landscape of digital finance and regulatory engagement. This accolade reflects a marked shift in how cryptocurrency firms are perceived by mainstream institutions.

With over 108 million users and more than $400 billion in custodial assets, Coinbase stands as the largest US-based crypto exchange. Analysts attribute significant weight to its aggressive advocacy efforts in Washington DC and its proactive approach to regulatory compliance, positioning the company as a key policy driver for the digital asset space.

Coinbase’s stock has mirrored its growing stature—rising approximately 42 per cent year-to-date and briefly touching $382 per share following the US Senate’s passage of the GENIUS stablecoin bill on 17 June. Market watchers note that its inclusion in the S&P 500 in May reinforces its transition from niche crypto exchange to mainstream financial institution. That move not only provides visibility to traditional investors but also signals regulatory confidence.

The cardinals of Coinbase’s ascent include its push for firm regulatory frameworks: it recently secured a MiCA license from Luxembourg’s Commission de Surveillance du Secteur Financier, enabling full European market operations. Plans are underway to establish its EU headquarters in Luxembourg, marking a strategic foothold in the continent.

Another bold initiative is Coinbase’s application to the US Securities and Exchange Commission to launch tokenised stock trading. If approved, this service could see the platform rival fintech peers such as Robinhood and Webull, offering fractionalised equity products under one roof.

Financially, Coinbase reported over $2 billion in trailing annual revenue and maintained $420 billion in assets under custody as of Q1 2025, up from $310 billion the preceding year. These figures, alongside institutional-tailored offerings such as Coinbase Prime, have caught the attention of Bernstein analysts, who raised their COIN price target by 50 per cent in light of this recognition.

Despite its successes, Coinbase’s journey has not been without hurdles. A May cyber-extortion attempt linked to stolen customer data resulted in an estimated cost of up to $400 million, though the company managed to contain the breach and refused to submit to ransom demands. This incident followed growing scrutiny from blockchain investigators concerning vulnerabilities and scam-related losses attributed to the platform. Still, the US SEC dismissed its enforcement action in February 2025, signalling regulatory progress.

Beyond its core operations, Coinbase wields significant influence in shaping public policy. Its 2024 lobbying campaign played a central role in positioning cryptocurrency as a campaign issue in the US election cycle. Time again underscored its impact, quoting: “Coinbase led a massive lobbying campaign … helping cement crypto as a voting issue,” and framing the company as “a key driver of the industry’s policy efforts in Washington D.C.”.

Looking ahead, industry observers anticipate further advances as Coinbase expands tokenised equity offerings and solidifies its role in institutional-grade products. These efforts, coupled with sustained lobbying presence and international expansion, point to a future where digital assets underpin new investment paradigms.

U.S. former President Donald Trump has announced that a group of “very wealthy people” is set to acquire TikTok’s U.S. operations, with identities expected to be disclosed in approximately two weeks. He stated that the sale would likely require approval from China’s President Xi Jinping, whom he anticipates will greenlight the transaction.

This development follows an extension of the deadline — now set for mid‑September — under a 2024 law mandating that ByteDance divest its U.S. TikTok assets or face a ban. Trump granted this third 90‑day reprieve on 19 June, citing negotiations and U.S. investors’ desire to maintain the app while safeguarding American user data.

The Protecting Americans from Foreign Adversary Controlled Applications Act, passed in April 2024, requires a “qualified divestiture” or risk removal from U.S. app stores. ByteDance challenged it in court, but the Supreme Court upheld its constitutionality in January 2025. TikTok was removed temporarily before Trump’s administration issued executive orders delaying its enforcement.

Trump reversed his earlier stance — once favouring a complete ban — after gaining a large TikTok following during his 2024 campaign. He credited the platform with boosting his appeal among younger voters.

A consortium led by Oracle, with interest from firms such as Blackstone, Amazon and Walmart, reportedly lost momentum this spring when China refused to approve the proposed transaction. The impasse was linked to Trump’s threat of tariffs, used as negotiating leverage.

Several potential bidders have emerged in the course of discussions. Notably, real‑estate magnate Frank McCourt has confirmed he remains ready to support a $20 billion bid through his group, Project Liberty. Other names associated with interest include Kevin O’Leary, former Activision Blizzard CEO Bobby Kotick, YouTuber Jimmy Donaldson — known as MrBeast — and former Treasury Secretary Steve Mnuchin.

Negotiations have involved U.S. Vice‑President J.D. Vance’s office and TikTok, which has pledged to continue working with U.S. officials and expressed gratitude for the extensions. ByteDance has stated that any deal would require compliance with both U.S. and Chinese legal frameworks.

As the mid‑September Reuters‑mandated deadline approaches, Trump’s timeline for announcing the buyer coincides with intensifying public and legal scrutiny. Critics, including Senator Mark Warner, argue that repeated extensions exceed presidential authority and compromise U.S. national security.

Trade expert Joel Thayer noted that even if the app is sold without its proprietary algorithm, the core TikTok experience could remain affordable — possibly undervalued compared to its full potential.

Approval from China remains the primary hurdle. Trump said securing Xi Jinping’s consent will be vital to finalising the transaction. Analysts suggest that any concessions — including a rollback of U.S. tariffs — may be part of a broader trade‑off tied to China’s agreement.

TikTok continues to operate in the U.S. ahead of the deadline, with its managers asserting commitment to user safety and asserting they have no intention of relinquishing presence in the market.