News related to
Edge

Tether chief executive Paolo Ardoino has pledged to catapult the company into the position of the world’s leading Bitcoin miner by the end of 2025, asserting that crypto‑mining is key to safeguarding its $10 billion‑plus Bitcoin reserves. He outlined a sweeping strategy centred on large‑scale investment in mining and energy infrastructure across Latin America.

Ardoino said Tether has already channelled upwards of $2 billion into mining and energy systems and is now accelerating deployment. While the company’s precise hash‑rate remains confidential, executives emphasise that their investment reflects both scale and strategic intent. The mining push forms part of a broader financial architecture designed to secure the firm’s Bitcoin holdings and further embed it within the Bitcoin ecosystem.

The announcement emerged at the Bitcoin Conference in Las Vegas, where Ardoino noted Tether’s robust earnings—reporting a $13 billion profit in 2024—and a sizeable portfolio of U.S. Treasuries. He revealed the firm holds more than 100,000 BTC and hinted that the mining operation will leverage renewable energy sources supporting its underlying reserves.

Tether is concurrently preparing to open‑source its Bitcoin Mining Operating System, which the company says will democratise mining by enabling participants ranging from individual Raspberry Pi setups to large‑scale farms to connect into secure point‑to‑point networks. The move is intended to broaden participation, enhance resilience of the Bitcoin network, and solidify Tether’s position as a leader in infrastructure innovation.

Energy infrastructure forms a crucial part of Tether’s strategy. Ardoino highlighted investments across Latin America in renewable energy projects, including substantial commitments in Uruguay and El Salvador, where Tether relocated its headquarters and backs geothermal initiatives through a project known as Volcano Energy. These investments reflect a dual focus: securing clean, reliable power for mining and contributing to regional energy resilience.

The strategic rationale centres on mitigating the risks of holding large Bitcoin reserves. Mining, Ardoino explained, provides not only operational control but also reinforces financial sovereignty, anchoring assets within a secured blockchain‑based ecosystem. By internalising hash‑rate and power sources, Tether aims to shield its holdings from external dependency and volatility.

Security considerations have informed the launch of MOS. As a decentralised architecture, the system allows devices to operate without reliance on central servers, reducing vulnerability to single‑point failures or third‑party disruptions. Looking ahead, Tether plans to integrate artificial‑intelligence tools into MOS to monitor performance and optimise operations in real time.

Tether’s move into open‑source mining software dovetails with its broader tech ambitions. Ardoino introduced QVAC, an AI platform that uses non‑custodial wallets, and unveiled plans for a Bitcoin‑centric wallet developed with Rumble. These projects underscore Tether’s strategy to embed Bitcoin deeper into digital finance and expand its ecosystem services.

Market observers note that Tether’s mining ambition places it in direct competition with publicly traded mining firms. Although exact hashrate figures are absent, the scale of investment and reserve holdings suggest that surpassing existing miners is credible by late 2025. Tracking progress will require scrutiny of deployment timelines and performance metrics, which Tether has declined to specify.

Financial analysts regard Tether’s diversified asset approach—spanning Bitcoin, gold and U.S. Treasuries—as a deliberate hedge strategy. The large Bitcoin reserves, reportedly worth over $10 billion, alongside substantial gold and treasury holdings, underpin a multifaceted capital structure. By converting passive holdings into active mining assets, Tether aims to generate operational yield and enhance asset security.

Critics of large‑scale corporate mining warn of environmental strains and centralisation risks. Tether’s emphasis on renewable energy uptake and decentralised software architecture reflects an attempt to mitigate these concerns. If MOS and energy projects deliver as promised, the model may provide a template for sustainable, corporate-scale participation in Bitcoin mining.

Next steps include the public release of MOS, scheduled for later in 2025, alongside scaling up of energy infrastructure across targeted Latin American sites. Close monitoring of mining output, energy efficiency, and systems performance will determine whether Tether’s pledge translates into actual dominance in global Bitcoin mining.

Barclays will prohibit customers from using personal credit and debit cards for any cryptocurrency transactions from 27 June 2025. The decision, targeting consumer protection, stems from mounting regulatory pressure and rising concerns over debt and fraud linked to crypto purchases.

The bank’s initiative aligns with guidance from the UK Financial Conduct Authority, which has flagged credit-fuelled crypto investments as high‑risk. Starting late June, any attempt to buy cryptocurrencies—such as Bitcoin or Ethereum—via personal Barclays cards will be automatically declined.

Barclays emphasises that this move is about protecting customers from potentially volatile assets acquired under credit. A spokesperson noted that while personal cards are blocked, other payment methods remain available. The bank asserts that safeguarding consumer finances remains its priority.

The FCA has long warned about the dangers of unregulated crypto assets, especially when purchased on credit. Consumers may accumulate unmanageable debt rapidly if asset prices tumble. Barclays’ policy mirrors earlier actions by Nationwide, Lloyds, and HSBC, which have instituted similar restrictions in recent years.

Industry observers suggest the move reflects wider regulatory caution. “We challenge the proposed ban…as it unfairly equates legitimate investment activity with gambling,” representatives from the UK Payments Association said. They argue customers deserve autonomy but acknowledge the bank’s concern over addiction-like behaviours and debt accumulation.

Financial behaviour analysts note that this policy is likely to reduce impulsive crypto spending, especially among less experienced investors. One market strategist commented, “The withdrawal of credit-based routes to crypto is a logical policy to limit rapid losses when prices plunge.” It may also influence broader market dynamics if other major banks adopt similar stances.

Retail crypto platforms responded with caution. Some are exploring partnerships with open finance firms, enabling bank transfers or peer-to-peer methods that evade card-related restrictions. However, these solutions still face regulatory scrutiny.

The FCA anticipates that removing credit channels will also decrease susceptibility to scams. Fraudulent schemes often exploit lending mechanisms to siphon user funds—something Barclays hopes to curtail under its new rule.

Barclays’ action adds to a string of regulatory-led shifts. After blocking card payments to Binance in July 2021, in line with an FCA notice, the bank has maintained a cautious approach. Now, the new policy encompasses all crypto transactions, regardless of the provider. While withdrawals and direct payments from existing accounts remain permitted, no credit is extended to purchase digital assets.

Crypto firms warn that this may inadvertently push users towards unregulated or foreign exchanges, increasing systemic exposure risks. They advocate for balanced regulation that allows innovation while shielding vulnerable consumers.

Despite industry pushback, Barclays notes that the measure only affects purchases with credit cards and does not restrict broader digital finance use. It emphasises support for regular account holders, offering alternative payment methods such as debit card direct transfers and open banking options.

Air India and IndiGo have recommenced services to the UAE after a suspension triggered by airspace closures amid the Israel–Iran conflict. Airlines halted operations on Monday following triggered restrictions from missile strikes on the U.S. Al Udeid Air Base in Qatar. With Gulf skies now reopening, the carriers have initiated phased resumption of flights, prioritising passenger safety and adjusted routing measures.

Reinstatement efforts began on Tuesday, with most Air India flights to and from the Middle East set to resume by 25 June. The airline confirmed European routes would also come back online, and services to the U.S. East Coast and Canada are slated to recommence “at the earliest opportunity”. IndiGo echoed this approach, stating operations through Gulf countries had “stabilised”, albeit with some flights rerouting around closed Iranian airspace, which may cause extended journey times. Air India Express has similarly resumed select West Asian routes, including those from Delhi and Mumbai to Muscat, Riyadh, Jeddah and key UAE destinations.

The sudden airspace closure followed Iran’s missile assault on Qatar’s Al Udeid base in retaliation to U.S. bombings of Iranian nuclear sites. Multiple states, including the UAE, Kuwait, Bahrain, Iraq and Qatar, sealed their skies, incurring over 160 flight diversions. Airlines including Air India, IndiGo, Gulf carriers, and major European operators were forced into rerouting, cancellations and prolonged airborne holds.

In Bengaluru, Kempegowda International Airport experienced significant disruption on Monday, as 21 international flights were either cancelled or diverted. Six incoming flights and ten departures were scrapped, while five services arriving from the Middle East were rerouted to Bengaluru. The affected flights included services from IndiGo, Air India, Akasa Air, Kuwait Airways and Gulf Air, connecting destinations such as Doha, Abu Dhabi, Jeddah, Kuwait, London, Dubai, Dammam and Bahrain. IndiGo has since issued advisories encouraging passengers to verify their itineraries via the airline’s app or website.

Airspace closures prompted widespread disruptions across India. At Delhi’s Indira Gandhi International Airport, 48 flights were cancelled. The closures also affected routes beyond the Gulf, with Air India suspending services to Europe, the East Coast of North America and Canada. Such decisions followed safety concerns reminiscent of past incidents involving civilian aircraft in conflict zones.

Air India’s messaging emphasised the phased nature of the restoration plan. The airline noted that most flights to the Middle East would resume by 25 June and affirmed regular updates to passengers via official channels. Delays and reroutings may continue temporarily as the network stabilises. The airline pledged to avoid airspace deemed unsafe by international aviation authorities. IndiGo’s CEO framed the resumption as “prudent and progressive”, committed to using the safest routes amid ongoing monitoring.

Industry experts highlight the additional burden on airlines due to these disruptions. Longer flight paths translate to higher fuel consumption and operational costs. Rival carriers in Europe and the Middle East have already adopted detours to bypass Israeli, Iraqi and Jordanian airspace, citing financial impacts and tighter margins. Brent crude oil briefly climbed to around $70.80 per barrel following the regional skirmishes, adding strain on airline fuel budgets.

Passenger advocacy groups have urged transparency from carriers during this phase. With unforeseen diversions and cancellations, travellers seek clarity on compensation, rerouting options and timely notifications. Airline platforms are now investing in real-time advisory systems to minimise frustration and smooth operational turbulence.

The current easing of tensions appears tied to a ceasefire agreement brokered by the United States, accepted by both Israel and Iran. Although hostilities continue in limited form, the reopening of Gulf airspace indicates improved conditions for aviation. Travel experts caution, however, that volatility may persist if diplomatic progress stalls or military exchanges recur.

For Indian travellers, the resumption of Middle East routes is particularly timely. The Gulf region is a major employment and transit hub, hosting millions of Indian nationals. Restored connectivity affects not only personal travel but also supply chains, cargo links and business routes vital to India’s economic relations with Gulf partners.

Looking ahead, most Indian airlines face a dual challenge: restoring pre-conflict schedules while preparing contingency plans for renewed tensions. Many are exploring additional over-water routes, flexible flight planning and enhanced coordination with aviation regulators. These efforts aim to ensure that in the event of future disruptions, passenger inconvenience is minimised and safety remains paramount.

Israeli defence minister Israel Katz declared late on 24 June that he had ordered the Israel Defence Forces to resume “high‑intensity operations” against regime targets in central Tehran. The announcement followed allegations that Iran had launched missiles into Israeli territory, in what Tel Aviv described as a blatant breach of a United States‑mediated ceasefire unveiled just hours earlier by President Donald Trump.

Trump had proclaimed a “complete and total ceasefire” on Truth Social, explaining that Iran would halt strikes first, followed by Israel, in a phased arrangement ending after 24 hours. Within three hours of that declaration, Israel alleged that Iran launched missiles toward its southern regions, prompting Katz’s directive to strike key Iranian infrastructure.

Contradicting Israel’s account, Tehran’s ISNA student news agency denied firing any missiles post‑ceasefire. Iranian foreign minister Abbas Araghchi had earlier stated that Tehran would cease retaliatory actions—conditional on Israel halting operations by 04:00 Tehran time, a condition that purportedly lapsed minutes before hostilities were to pause.

President Trump, addressing the situation on social media, urged both nations to honour the agreement and warned against any violations, offering his oversight as guarantor of the pledge. His announcement followed the deployment of U.S. B‑2 bombers striking three Iranian nuclear sites, and a symbolic retaliatory missile strike from Iran against a U.S. base in Qatar—strikes reportedly calibrated to minimise escalation.

Despite conflicting claims, available evidence indicates a spike in missile exchanges. According to Reuters, Israel’s southern city of Beersheba was hit, resulting in at least four fatalities, while various townships experienced temporary power outages after sirens sounded across the region as Iranian missiles streaked overhead.

Tehran mourned significant civilian losses, with over 10 Israelis killed and more than 250 injured during Iran’s earlier onslaught, which included bombardments on central and southern Israeli regions. Meanwhile, Israel took credit for eliminating senior Iranian military personnel and striking strategic nuclear and missile infrastructure; Benjamin Netanyahu celebrated Israel’s success in degrading what he described as a dual existential threat posed by Iran’s capabilities.

Regionally, Qatar responded strongly, summoning Iran’s ambassador and condemning the attack on U.S. forces at Al Udeid Air Base as a violation of its sovereignty and international law. Saudi Arabia expressed hope that all parties would uphold the ceasefire and de‑escalate.

International markets reacted positively to the ceasefire’s initial announcement. Oil prices dropped, and equities rallied on optimism that the conflict in the Strait of Hormuz might ease—although the renewed strikes quickly revived fears of a wider conflagration.

Experts scrutinise the long‑term viability of the truce. Some analysts suggest installation damage to Iran’s nuclear programme may be reversible, with Iran’s leadership determined to rebuild. Others view the U.S. use of bunker‑buster bombs and Israel’s strategic targeting of Iranian deterrents as potential deterrents that may delay a rapid resurgence.

On the political front, Trump is leveraging the declared ceasefire as a foreign‑policy milestone ahead of an imminent NATO summit. Netanyahu affirmed Israel would respond forcefully to any violations. Tehran warned that its military exercise would persist unless the bombing ended, contending that it acted to “punish Israel for its aggression until the very last minute”.

As global attention turns to negotiations, Qatar’s mediation role and U.S. involvement loom large. The deal remains tentative, with both Israel and Iran accusing each other of breaking terms, and uncertainty surrounding whether Trump’s phased ceasefire timeline will endure.

Donald Trump proclaimed a full ceasefire between Israel and Iran on Monday, marking what he described as the end of a “12‑day war” that forced millions from Tehran and sparked grave fears of escalation. He posted on Truth Social that Iran would halt its operations at midnight ET, followed by Israel twelve hours later, culminating in a 24‑hour cessation of hostilities.

Trump touted the move as a diplomatic breakthrough, congratulating “both Countries, Israel and Iran, on having the Stamina, Courage, and Intelligence to end” the conflict. He asserted that the agreement was brokered in discussions with Prime Minister Netanyahu and through U.S. envoys in dialogue with Tehran, with Qatar playing a key intermediary role.

Iran’s foreign minister, Abbas Araghchi, echoed that Tehran’s forces stood down at 4 a.m. Tehran time if Israel ceased its attacks by then, though he clarified that a final decision on halting military operations was pending. Israel’s military has yet to formally acknowledge the ceasefire, and missile alerts and strikes were still reported over Tel Aviv, Beersheba and the Golan Heights in the hours following the announcement.

The conflict began on 13 June when Israel launched airstrikes on Iran’s nuclear and military infrastructure, including sites near Natanz, Isfahan and Tehran. That response, which Israeli authorities described as necessary to counter an alleged Iranian march towards nuclear weapons capability, included the destruction of centrifuge material and the deaths of senior Iranian military figures and nuclear scientists. Iran retaliated with waves of missiles and drones aimed at Israeli territory; Israel intercepted many of them, but civilian casualties were reported in Beersheba and Tel Aviv.

The conflict widened when the United States joined with bunker‑buster strikes on Iranian underground nuclear facilities over the weekend, prompting Iran to retaliate by targeting the U.S. air base at Al Udeid in Qatar. The attack caused no casualties, and Trump later thanked Iran for the “early notice,” calling it a “very weak response”.

Though Trump dismissed European diplomatic efforts as ineffective, he warned that U.S. involvement remained a distinct possibility if Iran escalated further, positioning American strikes solely against nuclear targets. Internal Israeli pressure also rose; Prime Minister Netanyahu reportedly instructed ministers to refrain from public commentary as military activity approached a pause.

Humanitarian fallout during this period has been acute. Over 650 Iranians have died, according to Iranian health data, including civilians, and over 200 Israeli military and civilian fatalities have been reported. Tehran saw large-scale evacuations as power and internet access faltered.

International bodies raised alarms over the bombardment of nuclear facilities. The International Atomic Energy Agency cautioned against striking enrichment sites due to risks of radiological contamination. Legal experts also voiced concerns that the strikes on civilian infrastructure—including hospitals and residential neighborhoods—could constitute violations under international humanitarian law.

Despite the ceasefire declaration, uncertainty remains. Iran’s foreign minister warned that if Israeli attacks persisted past 4 a.m. Tehran time, hostilities could resume. Similarly, Israeli officials reported continued launcher of missiles from Iran, demonstrating that the ceasefire may be fragile.

Regional and global reactions have been varied. Qatar’s prime minister was credited with facilitating Iran’s acceptance of the U.S.-proposed ceasefire. European negotiators, meanwhile, expressed frustration that efforts in Geneva had produced little movement before hostilities intensified. Both Russia and China urged restraint and urged full de‑escalation.

Markets responded positively to the ceasefire announcement, reflecting investor hopes for regional stability, yet the humanitarian toll and legal implications—the destruction of nuclear infrastructure, civilian casualties, and potential violations of international law—leave an ambiguous legacy for a war that surged in intensity over just under two weeks. The path ahead now hinges on whether both nations uphold the phased withdrawal and open room for diplomatic resolution amid deep mistrust.

Al Udeid Air Base in Qatar, hosting around 10,000 U.S. and allied personnel, was struck on 23 June 2025 by a volley of short- and medium-range ballistic missiles launched by Iran in apparent retaliation for American airstrikes on its nuclear facilities. Qatar’s air defences intercepted the incoming salvo, reported as six missiles by Iran and fourteen by U.S. sources, with no casualties or significant damage recorded.

Tehran described the strike as a calibrated response, matching the number of missiles to bombs used in the U.S. assault on Natanz, Fordow and Esfahan, suggesting a bid to avoid civilian harm. Iranian state media dubbed the action “Operation Glad Tidings of Victory” and stressed it was carried out away from populated areas. U.S. President Donald Trump, characterising the barrage as “very weak,” acknowledged that Iran provided advance notice, enabling effective interception and preventing casualties.

Qatar issued a forceful denunciation, condemning the barrage as a “flagrant violation” of its sovereignty and international law. Dr Majed bin Mohammed Al Ansari, spokesperson for Qatar’s Foreign Ministry, warned that the country reserves the right to respond proportionally and reiterated calls for a return to genuine diplomacy. Qatar Airways temporarily suspended flights amid the airspace closure, and India’s embassy in Doha advised nationals to remain cautious amid the unfolding tensions.

The United Arab Emirates and Saudi Arabia also condemned the violence. The UAE described the missiles as a breach of Qatari sovereignty and called for an immediate halt to military escalation. Riyadh echoed this stance, expressing full support for Qatar and branding the strike “unjustifiable,” warning of broader destabilisation. The Arab League, Jordan, Bahrain and Oman joined the chorus, denouncing the attack and urging restraint.

Western capitals emphasised caution. France and Germany condemned the missile salvo but underscored the necessity of diplomacy. The United Nations and European Union called for urgent de-escalatory measures and a return to negotiations, with António Guterres warning of the risk of “regional conflagration”. Beijing and Moscow echoed appeals for a diplomatic resolution.

Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei stated that Iran would not succumb to aggression and that its missile barrage equalled the U.S. assault. Tehran also hinted at further measures if U.S. actions persist. Meanwhile, Israel unleashed its most extensive air campaign yet on Tehran, striking sites including Evin Prison and Fordow enrichment facility.

The strikes on Qatar and also U.S. bases in Iraq—though unconfirmed beyond Qatar—have prompted airspace closures over Gulf nations including Kuwait, Bahrain and the UAE. Commercial carriers like IndiGo and Air India Express issued advisories or rerouted flights, contributing to widening disruptions in travel.

Global financial markets reacted nervously, with oil prices briefly spiking over fears of disruption in the Strait of Hormuz, a critical passage for global energy shipments. The International Atomic Energy Agency, meanwhile, voiced anxiety about the security of Iran’s nuclear sites following the U.S. bombardment.

Analysts suggest Iran’s approach was designed to recalibrate the balance of deterrence without provoking full-scale war. The matched missile count, pre-warning, and focus on a remote military target indicate a calculated effort to signal strength while avoiding mass casualties.

Diplomats across Europe, the U.N. and the Gulf pressed for an immediate halt to further strikes and for major powers to step up mediation. Qatar, a longstanding facilitator of regional talks, is uniquely positioned to spearhead efforts. Both Iran and the U.S. have acknowledged potential for dialogue: Trump spoke of the prospect of “peace and harmony,” echoing Tehran’s assertions that the strike completed its “symbolic” objectives.

But with tensions now inflamed between Iran, Israel and the U.S., and Gulf states on alert, diplomatic channels face a critical juncture. Any miscalculation could unleash renewed conflict across the region.