News related to
Japan

Japan’s Financial Services Agency has unveiled plans to amend the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act, bringing cryptocurrencies under securities‑style regulation and opening the door to Bitcoin spot ETFs. The proposals also aim to replace the current progressive tax on crypto gains—ranging up to 55 per cent—with a uniform 20 per cent levy.

The agency’s discussion paper, released on 10 April by its digital policy division, outlines regulatory changes including classification of crypto into “Type 1” and “Type 2”, with insider‑trading rules to follow much like those in equity markets.

Behind the latest move is a growing consensus among Japan’s mainstream political and financial circles. The governing Liberal Democratic Party has actively backed the 20 per cent tax proposal, offering parity with capital‑gains treatment on stocks and bonds. It has also pushed to align tax on derivatives and crypto‑to‑crypto swaps accordingly.

Parliament is expected to review legislative amendments in early 2026, with the FSA targeting a policy direction announcement by mid‑2025.

Analysts note the regulatory upgrade could unlock institutional entry. While crypto ETFs have been launched in the US, Europe and Hong Kong, Japanese regulators have remained notably cautious. Under the proposed amendments, crypto-like instruments would qualify as financial instruments, subject to disclosure, custody, and market‑abuse safeguards.

This shift marks a departure from the current regime under the Payment Services Act, where digital assets are categorised alongside payments rather than securities. The FSA’s plan would position crypto within a legal framework better suited to large-scale trading activities.

Tax treatment has been a central barrier. Gains on crypto are now taxed as “miscellaneous” income—reaching rates as high as 55 per cent—while ETFs qualify as capital gains taxed around 20 per cent. The new flat rate would remove current inequities and possibly stimulate market growth.

Participants in the Japanese financial industry, including SBI and Franklin Templeton, are reportedly making strategic preparations. SBI has already collaborated with both US and UK asset managers to launch crypto‑related products, anticipating that regulatory approval will soon follow.

Despite these signals, caution persists. The Ministry of Finance remains cautious, wary of crypto’s volatility and adverse events such as the collapse of Mt. Gox and DMM Wallet, which led to extensive losses. The FSA itself is said to proceed methodically, emphasising investor protection above all.

To ensure granularity, the FSA’s discussion paper recommends dividing tokens into two regulatory categories: Type 1 assets—used in fundraising or business operations—and Type 2 assets, which include decentralised tokens like Bitcoin and Ethereum with no single issuer. This structure supports tailored oversight, including anti‑insider trading provisions.

Industry reactions reflect a mix of anticipation and prudence. Proponents argue that clearer classification and tax certainty would attract both retail and institutional investors. They point to the global momentum behind crypto ETFs and the relative tax efficiency such structures bring. Opponents, however, urge regulators to remain vigilant to market manipulation and developing infrastructure risks.

Global comparisons place Japan near the frontier of regulatory maturity. Countries such as the United States have delayed crypto classification under securities law even as they approved Bitcoin ETFs. The EU’s MiCA and Hong Kong’s licensing framework signal increased global regulatory alignment. Japan’s proposed amendments would signal competitive parity in Asia‑Pacific markets.

As Japan prepares to table the bill in parliament in 2026, attention will centre on implementation details. These include ETF approval timelines, disclosure requirements for exchanges and custodians, and whether the flat‑tax rate will apply retroactively or to future accruals only.

The United Arab Emirates will integrate its National Artificial Intelligence System into the highest levels of government from January 2026. The system will serve as an advisory member of the Council of Ministers, the Ministerial Development Council, and the boards of all federal entities and government-owned companies. Its mandate includes supporting decision-making, providing real-time analysis, offering technical advice, and enhancing policy efficiency across every sector.

Dubai’s ruler and UAE Prime Minister, Sheikh Mohammed bin Rashid Al Maktoum, made the announcement on 20 June, emphasising that the world is undergoing “comprehensive transformation—scientifically, economically and socially.” He underscored that the move is intended to prepare the country for future challenges and to “ensure continued prosperity and a dignified life for future generations”.

This development builds upon the UAE’s decade‑long focus on artificial intelligence, which began with the appointment of Omar Sultan Al Olama as the world’s first Minister of State for Artificial Intelligence in October 2017. In early 2019, the National Artificial Intelligence Strategy 2031 was launched, setting the ambition to position the UAE as a global AI leader by 2031. Subsequent milestones include the founding of the Mohamed bin Zayed University of Artificial Intelligence in 2019 and Abu Dhabi’s Digital Strategy 2025‑2027, which aims to establish a fully AI‑powered government by 2027.

Analysts suggest that embedding the AI system at ministerial and federal‑company levels could accelerate data‑driven governance, reduce bureaucratic lag, and foster greater inter‑departmental cohesion. One Gulf Business commentator noted that the AI system would “enhance the efficiency of government policies adopted… across all sectors”. However, questions remain over oversight and transparency mechanisms, especially as the system begins analysis in real time.

International observers view the UAE’s strategy as part of a wider push by governments to use AI in public administration. Examples include Japan’s smart city prototype “Woven City” and various national AI offices globally. Still, no other nation has yet placed an AI inside its cabinet with ministerial‑level access.

Experts highlight both promise and peril. Proponents argue the system’s analytical speed can help identify emerging economic, environmental, and public health challenges before they escalate. Critics, however, caution that AI must be complemented by human judgment to avoid embedding algorithmic bias or over‑reliance on model outputs. Ethical guidelines—such as transparency, accountability, and fairness—will need to be codified and enforced to mitigate these risks.

Practical implementation looms as another challenge. Seamless integration into federal bodies and government companies will require significant investment in digital infrastructure, staff training, and inter‑agency coordination. These tasks fall within the remit of the Minister of State for AI, Digital Economy and Remote Work Applications, Omar Sultan Al Olama, who has spearheaded the country’s AI strategy since 2017.

As part of a broader governance overhaul, Sheikh Mohammed also announced the launch of a dedicated Ministry of Foreign Trade, led by Thani bin Ahmed Al Zeyoudi—and the renaming of the Ministry of Economy to the Ministry of Economy and Tourism under Abdullah bin Touq Al Marri.

The government asserts that the AI system will augment human capacity without replacing it, and that final decisions on strategy and policy will remain with elected or appointed officials. Mechanisms to monitor AI‑led inputs and outcomes are expected to be announced before the system’s January 2026 launch, according to insiders.

Abu Dhabi’s state‑owned oil giant ADNOC has unveiled plans to escalate its U.S. energy investments six‑fold over the next decade, targeting a total of $440 billion. Speaking in Washington on 17 June, Sultan al‑Jaber, ADNOC Chief Executive and UAE Minister of Industry and Advanced Technology, declared that the American market is “not just a priority; it is an investment imperative” for the company’s global expansion.

Al‑Jaber underlined the urgency of the move, emphasising that artificial intelligence represents a “once‑in‑a‑generation investment opportunity.” He pointed out that the growth of data centres driven by AI will demand substantial power— “The next stage of evolution” in energy consumption, he said. The planned investments will span a wide spectrum: anchor stakes in the largest liquefied natural gas facility in Texas, petrochemical plants, and the deployment of 5.5 gigawatts of renewable energy paired with storage systems “from coast to coast”.

ADNOC’s international investment arm, XRG, is cementing its presence with a new Washington office, aimed at steering these high‑stakes ventures. XRG has already struck a deal with Occidental’s 1PointFive for a direct air capture project in Texas, with potential investment reaching $500 million. Additional widescale cooperation includes agreements to develop U.S. gas, LNG, specialty chemicals and energy infrastructure.

The announcement synchronises with a broader bilateral strategy: in March, senior UAE officials committed to a ten‑year, $1.4 trillion investment framework in the U.S., covering sectors such as AI, energy, semiconductors and manufacturing. As part of that pact, U.S. companies agreed to invest $60 billion in UAE energy assets. The XRG–Occidental partnership, as well as other collaborations involving ExxonMobil, Japanese firms Inpex and JODCO, is expected to expand capacity at Abu Dhabi’s major offshore oil field, Upper Zakum.

At the Atlantic Council Global Energy Forum in Washington, al‑Jaber addressed the broader challenge of powering AI, stating that U.S. energy infrastructure must undergo a “system‑wide shift” to keep pace. He highlighted the need to hyperscale energy supply—from gas, renewables with storage and nuclear—to meet the projected requirement of 50–150 GW of new capacity just in the next five years. He warned against prematurely retiring existing power plants, advocating instead for grid modernisation and rapid permitting for new infrastructure.

Environmental groups have voiced concern that the surge in AI‑driven energy demand could lead to rising carbon emissions unless clean energy is prioritised. In response, al‑Jaber suggested that AI could, in fact, offer solutions—optimising grid efficiency and managing load fluctuations, effectively “unlocking its own energy challenge”.

The energy‑AI summit ENACT, hosted by XRG and MGX alongside the Atlantic Council, gathered leading figures from across the energy, tech and finance sectors. Delegates, including representatives from Exxon, OpenAI and BP, discussed mid‑ and long‑term strategies to address the escalating power needs of hyperscale data centres.

These developments are set against a backdrop of rising instability in the Middle East, where al‑Jaber cautioned that energy remains a “cornerstone of peace, stability and prosperity,” signalling that the new chapter of collaboration aims to underpin global energy security.

For the U.S., the influx of investment promises a host of benefits: large‑scale infrastructure expansion, high‑task employment, and reinforced energy resilience. Projects under the UAE umbrella—from LNG plants to hydrogen and carbon capture initiatives—are poised to generate thousands of jobs, while U.S. energy firms gain access to new development avenues both at home and back in the Gulf.

Yet questions remain. Policy experts stress that realisation of al‑Jaber’s ambitious vision will depend heavily on ensuring timely regulatory approvals and creating an effective risk environment for private capital. Moreover, balancing fossil fuel commitments with the drive toward decarbonisation will require clear direction from both governments and industry stakeholders.

Japanese investment firm Metaplanet has scaled its way into the top ten corporate Bitcoin holders by acquiring a further 1,088 BTC for roughly $117.9 million, boosting its total holdings to 8,888 BTC and vaulting above Galaxy Digital and Block Inc. into ninth place worldwide. The firm purchased the coins at an average price of approximately $108,400 each, signalling deepening confidence in its treasury strategy underpinned by sustained market uncertainty.

Metaplanet’s pivot from hotel management to cryptocurrency began in 2024. Since then, its stock has surged dramatically, at times rising over 8,850 per cent in just two years, as the company pursued a bitcoin‑centric treasury model. That performance has mirrored similar moves in the sector, including U.S. software firm Strategy, whose model inspired Metaplanet’s pivot.

The firm announced a plan to raise approximately $5.3–5.4 billion via stock acquisition rights—the largest warrant issuance in Japan—to scale its bitcoin holdings to 210,000 BTC by the end of 2027. Metaplanet previously outlined a target of 21,000 BTC by the end of 2026, which has since been superseded by the more ambitious 100,000 BTC milestone for next year.

Metaplanet’s CEO, Simon Gerovich—a former Goldman Sachs derivatives trader—told investors that Bitcoin serves as a hedge against a weakening yen, prolonged negative interest rates, and rising concerns over sovereign debt, setting it apart from traditional safe‑haven assets such as government bonds. This reflects broader market trends: analysts at Bitwise and Bitfinex suggest high sovereign bond default probabilities and consolidation above cost basis support further upside for Bitcoin prices.

Metaplanet’s strategy, dubbed the “555 Million Plan” and following its earlier “21 Million Plan”, channels nearly all funds raised into bitcoin purchases while maintaining flexibility to adjust funding based on market conditions and shareholder dilution safeguards. Its holdings, valued at close to $1 billion, now compare with those of Strategy, which boasts over 580,000 BTC, and ranks first among corporate holders.

Investor reactions have been swift: Metaplanet’s stock surged 15–22 per cent following the acquisition announcement and financing plan, underscoring strong market appetite for its bold strategy. Still, scepticism remains; industry analysts such as Standard Chartered caution that corporate reliance on Bitcoin may heighten balance‑sheet risk during market downturns and raise concerns about overvaluation in proxy‑stock structures.

This aggressive accumulation mirrors industry-wide dynamics. Over 60 public companies now hold more than 3 per cent of Bitcoin’s total supply, with estimates suggesting corporate demand may channel up to $330 billion into Bitcoin by 2029. In this environment, Metaplanet is positioning itself as Asia’s counterpart to MicroStrategy, not only through fearless accumulation but also via initiatives like the forthcoming ‘Bitcoin Hotel’ in Tokyo and educational outreach through its Japanese licence of Bitcoin Magazine.

Nevertheless, experts warn that this model carries heightened exposure to Bitcoin’s extreme volatility, potential regulatory shifts, and macroeconomic undercurrents. While some view Metaplanet as a pioneer advancing institutional acceptance of crypto, others argue the strategy intensifies concentration risks within corporate treasuries.