News related to
Stage

Alibaba Cloud has unveiled its third data centre in Malaysia and confirmed plans for a second facility in the Philippines, deepening its infrastructure presence in Southeast Asia. The Malaysian centre became operational on 1 July 2025, while the Philippine hub is scheduled to launch by October 2025. These moves are part of Alibaba’s broader efforts to bolster cloud and AI services across the region.

Growth in cloud demand and the strategic importance of Southeast Asia underpin this expansion. Alibaba Group’s cloud division has embarked on a $52 billion investment over the next three years to build a unified global cloud network, spanning Asia, the Middle East, Europe and the Americas. Southeast Asia has emerged as a pivotal battleground as enterprises accelerate AI adoption and seek resilient digital infrastructure.

At a summit in Singapore marking Alibaba Cloud’s tenth anniversary in the city-state, Eddie Wu, CEO of Alibaba Cloud, highlighted the company’s strategy: “Globalisation is Alibaba Cloud’s long‑term strategy,” he said, adding that the company would “accelerate the development of its global cloud computing network”. These statements reinforce Alibaba’s ambition to deliver end‑to‑end cloud services, spanning compute, storage, networking and AI capabilities.

This announcement follows earlier infrastructure roll‑outs across Asia. The company deployed a second data centre in South Korea in June 2025 and launched new regions in Thailand and Mexico in the first half of the year. Strategic market withdrawals from Australia and India in 2024 appear to be counterbalanced by intensified investment in high‑potential markets.

Southeast Asia’s accelerating digital transformation is creating rising demand for secure, scalable cloud services. Malaysia, with its growing ecosystem of startups and tech‑savvy enterprises, will now benefit from three Alibaba Cloud zones, an improvement in redundancy and local connectivity. The Philippine expansion addresses growing demand in Manila and surrounding urban centres, where cloud adoption is being propelled by fintech, e‑commerce, and the BPO sector.

At the Singapore summit, Alibaba also launched its AI Global Competency Centre, designed to support over 5,000 businesses and 100,000 developers. The centre offers access to advanced AI models, labs and infrastructure support. These investments aim to accelerate enterprise AI adoption by providing both tools and training through partnerships with more than 120 universities, aiming to train 100,000 AI professionals annually.

In addition to infrastructure, Alibaba Cloud is upgrading its cloud offerings. The ninth‑generation intel‑based Enterprise Elastic Compute Service will roll out across Malaysia, the Philippines, Japan, South Korea, Thailand, UAE, Germany and the UK from July. Enhancements to its Data Transmission Service and Platform for AI demonstrate a push to simplify deployment of large language models and accelerate inference capabilities.

Competitive pressure in Southeast Asia is intensifying, with other hyperscalers—AWS, Microsoft Azure, Google Cloud—announcing new regions and services. Alibaba’s bets on localised data centres, AI‑centric products and talent development programmes are its response to positioning itself as a regionally integrated cloud‑AI partner.

Regulatory headwinds and trade tensions, particularly restrictions on Chinese cloud firms, lend further urgency to Alibaba’s diversification strategy. By embedding infrastructure in Southeast Asia, the company aims to mitigate geopolitical risk, offer compliant local services and deliver low‑latency performance.

Corporate results reflect this momentum: Alibaba Cloud has reported double‑digit year‑on‑year growth in AI‑related product revenues for six consecutive quarters, with Q4 cloud revenue hitting CNY 31.7 billion and quarterly growth of 13%. These figures position the unit as the fastest‑growing segment within the broader Alibaba Group.

Tech analysts and regional partners have praised the expansion as timely. “These deployments will significantly improve resilience, latency and service coverage across key markets,” remarked a Southeast Asia‑based CIO. A telco executive added that local data centres are crucial to scaling AI‑powered services like real‑time analytics, IoT and smart city infrastructure.

Channel partners in Malaysia and the Philippines, including telcos and systems integrators, anticipate accelerated digital transformations. Industry groups reported a surge in enquiries following the Malaysian centre’s opening, particularly from manufacturing and education sectors. Cloud‑native startups welcomed the news, viewing the increased compute availability as essential to scaling AI‑driven products.

Optimising energy use and sustainability is also part of the plan. Alibaba’s “Energy Expert” ESG‑focused reporting tool integrates AI into energy management. This aligns with industry benchmarks that 84% of leaders see green AI as important, although 69% are still at early adoption stages. Emerging green data centre practices—including renewable power sourcing and efficient cooling—are expected to feature prominently in the Southeast Asian roll‑outs.

The Malaysian data centre opens amid strong macro trends: Malaysia’s digital economy was projected to grow at over 10% annually through the next five years, while Philippine cloud adoption is forecast to grow at a similar rate, driven by government digitalisation policies and enterprise cloudisation. As Alibaba deploys this enhanced infrastructure, both nations are expected to see AI‑centred cloud services gain momentum in verticals ranging from finance to manufacturing.

The U. S. House of Representatives will convene “Crypto Week” from 14–18 July to vote on three pivotal digital asset bills: the CLARITY Act, the Anti‑CBDC Surveillance State Act, and the GENIUS Act. This coordinated effort signals a major shift in federal crypto policy as lawmakers aim to clarify regulation, protect financial privacy, and foster blockchain innovation.

The CLARITY Act seeks to establish a definitive regulatory framework by delineating the roles of the SEC and CFTC, mandating the segregation of customer funds, and requiring enhanced retail disclosures. It has already passed through both the Financial Services and Agriculture Committees by decisive margins, reflecting bipartisan support and responding directly to industry demands for legal certainty.

The GENIUS Act, recently approved by the Senate in a strong 68–30 bipartisan vote, focuses on stablecoin regulation. It mandates that stablecoin reserves be held in high‑quality, liquid assets such as U. S. Treasuries, requires annual audits for issuers with over $50 billion in market cap, and clarifies regulatory oversight while allowing banks to issue their own tokens. The bill now awaits a House vote, with hopes of reaching the president’s desk by late July.

The Anti‑CBDC Surveillance State Act takes a definitive stance against a federally issued central bank digital currency, effectively prohibiting the Federal Reserve from developing or distributing a CBDC. Proponents frame it as a necessary measure to safeguard financial privacy and prevent potential government surveillance through digital currency systems.

Deputy Speaker Mike Johnson and committee chairs, including Financial Services Chair French Hill and Agriculture Chair GT Thompson, have emphasised that this legislative package aligns with former President Trump’s digital assets agenda — aiming to position the U. S. as a leader in crypto innovation. Johnson stated that the bills would deliver the full scope of that agenda, while Hill highlighted that the initiative would finally provide clarity for innovators, protecting both consumers and the broader digital economy.

Majority Leader Steve Scalise echoed the sentiment, saying the legislation would solidify the U. S.’s global leadership in digital assets. Minority voices have also weighed in: Majority Whip Tom Emmer described the moment as a “historic opportunity” to uphold “privacy, individual sovereignty, and free‑market competitiveness.” Senator Bill Hagerty voiced Senate support, noting the urgency of enacting these measures swiftly.

While the GENIUS Act has Senate backing, the CLARITY Act has faced scrutiny from Democrats and former regulators. Experts such as ex‑CFTC Chair Timothy Massad have warned that its provisions could be overly broad or convoluted, advocating instead for a collaborative regulatory approach between the SEC and CFTC. Concerns also persist among left‑leaning lawmakers that pairing the CLARITY Act with stablecoin regulation could stall progress, despite strong crypto industry support calling for their passage in tandem.

Lawmakers like Rep. Warren Davidson have promoted consolidating stablecoin, market‑structure, and CBDC ban measures into a single legislative package to ensure comprehensive reform. However, this strategy may encounter resistance in the Senate, potentially delaying the bills past the intended timeline.

The Senate’s passage of the GENIUS Act earlier this month reflected growing bipartisan agreement on stablecoin oversight but also revealed tensions over inclusion of Trump‑era cryptocurrency interests. Indeed, some critics have raised ethical questions about exempting the president’s family from the bill’s prohibitions on member profits, and the influence of Trump‑linked ventures that reportedly earned tens of millions from crypto operations.

Despite these controversies, House Republicans are pushing ahead with “Crypto Week” as a gateway to shaping U. S. cryptocurrency policy. The CLARITY Act furthers efforts made under the FIT21 digital asset law passed in May 2024, which established initial delineation of regulatory authority.

As 14 July approaches, industry stakeholders, advocacy groups, and congressional offices are bracing for intense debates. Passing these bills could redefine market structures, unlock stablecoin innovation, and reinforce constitutional privacy rights—or it may start a protracted legislative battle over oversight, accountability, and the future role of federal oversight in digital currencies.

The Securities and Exchange Commission is developing a standardised framework that would allow token-based exchange-traded funds to list directly on exchanges, without requiring individual Rule 19b‑4 filings. The initiative, still in early stages, would set eligibility criteria—such as specific thresholds for market capitalisation, trading volume and liquidity—to determine which tokens qualify for streamlined launches.

This approach echoes previous SEC moves: in 2016, actively managed ETFs gained generic listing access under Rule 19b‑4, bypassing lengthy approval processes. Exchanges such as NYSE, Nasdaq and Cboe laid the groundwork by integrating uniform listing standards for index-based and active ETFs, paving the way for this token-focused evolution.

In May, Nasdaq formally proposed Rule 5703 to facilitate generic listing of multi-class ETFs, provided they align with Rule 6c‑11 and relevant exemption orders—allowing shares to debut without SEC review per fund. Similarly, Cboe sought generic listing permission for commodity-based ETFs to enable immediate options trading once criteria are met. The current SEC effort extends that logic to the burgeoning field of digital asset tokens.

Nasdaq has suggested the SEC adopt consistent standards for spot crypto ETPs under the 1933 Act, arguing that futures-based equivalents have already benefited from generic listing systems. This dovetails with mounting interest in regulated spot token funds, evidenced by amendments to listings such as Solana ETFs by issuers including 21Shares and Bitwise.

Under the envisaged standard, exchanges would apply objective, measurable thresholds—minimum market cap, daily volume and liquidity—to lists of token ETPs. Meeting these thresholds would allow issuers to bypass the full Rule 19b‑4 paperwork and associated months-long wait. Exchanges would retain responsibility for ongoing surveillance, as required by Section 19b‑4, ensuring investor protection and market integrity.

Stakeholders believe the move could vastly reduce time-to-market and cut legal and administrative costs. Industry analysts have highlighted that current Rule 19b‑4 reviews often delay ETF launches by months, even years. Exchanges argue that objectively defined generic standards provide predictability and efficiency—benefits that appear essential in digital asset markets known for rapid innovation.

Critics caution, however, that token assets may present unique compliance and market-risk considerations. Spot crypto markets, for instance, remain vulnerable to manipulation, price fragmentation and regulatory uncertainty. Ensuring adequate surveillance and governance, they warn, is material to the standard’s success.

To address this, exchanges plan to build in monitoring mechanisms, adaptation of surveillance regimes, and safeguards to delist or suspend tokens that fail to maintain standards. Similar models have been applied to options on commodity ETFs and multi-class ETF shares, suggesting a tested regulatory infrastructure.

The SEC’s token-ETF framework is likely to include consultation with market participants and exchanges, incorporating feedback from recent proposals such as Nasdaq’s push for spot crypto ETP generic listing. Legal advisors emphasise the importance of clear, data-driven criteria to withstand Rule 19b‑4’s statutory requirement for investor protection.

Key players expected to benefit include token issuers, established asset managers entering crypto, and intermediaries seeking to offer exchange-traded token exposure. Streamlined listing could also encourage institutional investors to enter the token market with confidence, potentially increasing adoption and liquidity.

Within the regulatory community, observers note that the SEC is mindful of its 2024 approval of spot Ether ETFs via individual 19b‑4 forms; a broader listing standard could expand this success to a wider array of digital assets. Meanwhile, pending amendments relating to token staking in ETFs—such as those Cboe filed in March—underscore the growing diversity within crypto-linked products.

As deliberations progress, industry and legal experts are analysing possible criteria thresholds, surveillance protocols, and whether the framework will initially apply only to spot token ETPs or extend to futures and hybrid products. Exchanges appear to favour a phased approach, beginning with established tokens that already meet basic listing requirements.

Hyperliquid has processed a staggering $1.571 trillion in perpetual futures volume over the past year, outstripping all other on‑chain perp platforms combined. In June alone, it accounted for $208 billion in trading, compared with a collective $140 billion for its rivals, while revenues reached $56 million for the month and reached $310 million to date.

The scale of Hyperliquid’s growth positions it at the apex of the decentralised derivatives landscape. It handled $248 billion in May trading volume, marking consecutive monthly milestones and accelerating ahead of competitors. High‑frequency and professional traders have migrated in significant numbers, drawn by the platform’s deep liquidity and sub‑second trade execution, powered by its Layer‑1 consensus architecture.

From a revenue standpoint, Hyperliquid’s fee income has climbed in tandem with its trade volume. The $56 million earned in June boosted cumulative revenues to $310 million, indicating a protocol that is both popular and profitable. This places Hyperliquid among elite DeFi entities by financial metrics.

Its distinctive approach includes a high yield from protocol fees—the majority of which are reinvested through HYPE token buybacks—and the launch of HyperEVM, an Ethereum‑compatible layer that supports smart contracts and decentralised applications. This diversification strategy is intended to establish Hyperliquid beyond perpetuals trading, and into a broader DeFi ecosystem.

The platform’s airdrop strategies have been instrumental in attracting users and liquidity. A notable HYPE token airdrop, totalling around $1.2 billion in value, triggered a sharp increase in activity at the end of 2024. Monthly volumes leapt from approximately $75 billion in November to over $150 billion in December.

Despite early-stage competition, Hyperliquid now dominates with approximately 70 per cent market share of decentralised perp volume, while still trailing major centralised exchanges such as Binance—where it handles roughly 10 per cent of Binance’s volume.

Underlying infrastructure also underpins its rapid adoption. Hyperliquid supports over 100,000 transactions per second and offers sub‑second trade finality with extraordinarily low spreads. Its fee structure—0.025 per cent taker fees and a 0.002 per cent maker rebate—encourages high-frequency participation.

The HYPE token, launched via the airdrop in November 2024, has experienced a dramatic uptick in value, up 300 per cent in two months and recently reaching a market capitalisation north of $12 billion. Reinvestment of over 97 per cent of fee revenue into token buybacks is designed to reinforce token utility and value.

Analysts acknowledge the bold strategy but flag decentralisation concerns—Hyperliquid operates just 21 delegated validators compared with thousands in more established chains, which may raise governance and resilience risks. Still, the streamlined validator model has enabled performance gains attractive to traders.

Market observers also point to institutional interest, such as Nasdaq‑listed Lion Group designating HYPE as a primary treasury asset, signalling growing confidence in the network’s tokenomics.

Hong Kong’s government on 26 June issued its Policy Statement 2.0 on the development of digital assets, signalling a decisive push to position the city at the forefront of the global crypto landscape. The statement introduces the comprehensive “LEAP” framework—Legal, Expand, Advance, People—underlining a mission to develop a trusted, innovative, and deeply integrated ecosystem for digital assets.

The regulatory reforms assign explicit oversight roles: the Securities and Futures Commission will licence digital asset exchanges, custodial and dealing services, while the Hong Kong Monetary Authority will govern bank-related activities in the sector. In addition, licensing regimes for stablecoin issuers and custodians are scheduled to commence on 1 August 2025, designed to strengthen anti‑money‑laundering safeguards, investor protection, and transparency in stablecoin issuance.

Central to Policy 2.0 is a commitment to tokenisation of traditional financial instruments and real‑world assets. The government will regularise issuance of tokenised government bonds, streamline stamp‑duty treatment for tokenised ETFs, and legislate to support tokenisation of assets such as precious and non‑ferrous metals, and renewable energy products. These bids aim to boost liquidity and broaden market access, aligning with existing initiatives such as the HK$6.8 billion in green bond token issuances since 2022.

Stablecoins also feature prominently, with proposals to pilot licensed stablecoins in public sector uses. Market consultation is seeking input on integrating these instruments into government operations and cross‑border payments, underpinned by stricter regulatory clarity. Tax incentives for private investment vehicles and family offices trading digital asset securities are expected in the 2025–26 fiscal year, aligning digital and traditional financial regimes.

International alignment is embedded in the blueprint. Hong Kong’s framework adheres to global standards—covering anti‑money‑laundering as per FATF, Basel Committee prudential supervision, IOSCO’s policy recommendations, and OECD crypto‑asset tax transparency measures. Complementary pilot schemes include HKMA’s “Project Ensemble” wholesale central bank digital currency trials, LME‑backed tokenisation of metal assets in Hong Kong warehouses, and a Cyberport‑sponsored incubator scheme to finance blockchain startups.

Since unveiling its original 2022 policy, the government has approved licences for over a dozen digital asset platforms, including nine trading licences and OTC frameworks, and supported tokenised bond issues by both government and corporate entities. Financial Secretary Paul Chan and SFC chief Julia Leung emphasise that this next phase marks a departure from pilot testing, transitioning toward institutionalisation and global competitiveness.

Industry leaders responded positively. Legal and compliance expert Cora Ang described the framework as “a strategic win” that aligns regulatory clarity with stablecoin and tokenisation growth. HashKey CEO Xiao Feng noted the city is entering a “new stage of maturity”, transitioning from sandbox environments to a substantive digital assets regime. Historical drivers such as the JPEX OTC fraud prompted regulators to enforce tighter custody and trading separation to protect investors.

Notably, fintech legal advisers in Hong Kong report surging demand. Firms are actively supporting issuance of tokenised gold and digital bonds, as banks like Bank of Communications and Zhuhai Huafa Group deploy digital debt instruments via licensed platforms. Meanwhile, legal specialists continue to advocate for derivatives, margin‑lending, and institutional frameworks targeted at professional investors.

Hong Kong’s strategic deployment of Policy 2.0 underlines a competitive counterbalance to rival jurisdictions such as Singapore, Dubai, and the US, each advancing their own crypto regulatory frameworks. The city’s alignment with global financial standards—alongside tailored incentives and public‑sector engagement—signals a comprehensive, forward‑leaning posture in digital asset finance.

Malaysia has officially unveiled the Startup ASEAN platform during its tenure as ASEAN chair, establishing a fully operational digital gateway designed to unite entrepreneurs, investors and ecosystem enablers across Southeast Asia. The launch—following a developmental blueprint initiated in 2024—unlocks access to regional markets, capital, talent and data, with an aspirational target of onboarding at least 10,000 startups by year-end.

The platform’s roll‑out represents phase two of the ASEAN Startup Technology Ignite initiative. Development and a soft launch took place in 2024, while the newly announced phase includes capacity‑building programmes and a Startup ASEAN summit. A third phase commencing in 2026 will see the establishment of an ASEAN Centre of Excellence dedicated to early‑stage ventures.

Minister of Science, Technology and Innovation Chang Lih Kang described the platform as a “strategic enabler” born from collaborative efforts among all ASEAN member states. He highlighted its role in bridging fragmented access to finance, talent and market opportunities. At the launch in Putrajaya, he underlined that approximately 5,000 startups have already joined and affirmed the year‑end goal of doubling that number.

ASEAN Secretary‑General Dr Kao Kim Hourn echoed these commitments, stating that the platform exemplifies deeper regional integration and presents “unprecedented opportunities” through technology. He noted that the platform extends to ecosystem builders and government institutions, reflecting ASEAN’s dedication to fostering inclusive innovation.

Cradle Fund Sdn Bhd, appointed by Malaysia’s MOSTI, is spearheading implementation. Its group chief executive, Norman Matthieu Vanhaecke, emphasised that the platform transcends mere technology: it is designed to generate meaningful partnerships, foster cross‑border initiatives and catalyse growth across the region. He said it will track metrics such as startup onboarding, investment activity and regional collaboration, aiming to involve 2,000 investors and 500 strategic partners by 2025.

Dr Kao highlighted the context underpinning this push. Southeast Asia hosts over 680 million people—more than half under 35—with a combined GDP exceeding US$3.9 trillion and a digital economy projected to surpass US$1 trillion by 2030. Kuala Lumpur’s leap into the top 20 emerging startup hubs, ranking 18th in the Global Startup Ecosystem Report 2025 by Startup Genome, provided a credible basis for regional leadership.

CupTuring beyond connecting stakeholders, the platform is set to host a suite of programmes. Already underway are collaborative initiatives with international partners such as South Korea and China, and plans include additional regional market‑access sessions and mentorship opportunities. The launch event featured a video tour with startup success narratives and a regional market access session, ASEAN CrossConnect, which paired ten seasoned mentors with participating startups.

The platform’s ecosystem metrics are compelling: as of the launch, more than 4,000 startups and 1,087 investors were registered, contributing to an ecosystem valued at over US$131.2 billion.

Governments from less developed ASEAN nations were assured of equal standing on the platform. Chang emphasised its borderless design, allowing any startup with internet access to connect with markets and investors across the region.

The Startup ASEAN initiative traces back to 2023, when ASEAN leaders approved a framework empowering Cradle to lead policy development, ecosystem readiness, and cross‑sector partnerships. The recent formal launch marks the first major deliverable of the Ignite initiative under Malaysia’s ASEAN chairmanship.

Experts view the initiative as a timely response to ASEAN’s broader economic integration agenda, reflected in recent high‑level declarations such as the Kuala Lumpur Declaration. The new platform aligns with ASEAN Community Vision 2045, aiming to strengthen innovation, connectivity and socio-economic resilience.

Poland has become the first European country to pilot palm vein–based biometric payments, while Tencent is advancing similar technology in Thailand, setting the stage for a wider rollout across Southeast Asia. Autopay’s HandGo system and Tencent’s palm biometrics reflect a growing global interest in contactless and secure transaction methods.

Autopay has initiated a pilot of HandGo by allowing customers at select venues—such as the Limitless sauna complex in Sopot—to make purchases by placing their palm on a scanner. Once a user links a payment card in the Autopay app, they register their palm vein pattern via QR-triggered enrolment. A digital hand token is then stored securely, enabling future transactions without a card, smartphone, or smartwatch. Autopay emphasises that no actual image of the hand is stored—only encrypted vein pattern data and a payment token meeting PCI‑DSS standards. Company executives describe the offering as a potential game‑changer for wellness and sports facilities, emphasising convenience and hygiene.

Globally, competitors already include Amazon’s Amazon One and Alipay’s PL1 device. Autopay distinguishes itself in Poland by being the nation’s first palm-auth payment provider, placing it alongside early vein‑scanning efforts by BPH bank and fintech Payvein. Another biometric contender, PayEye, combines iris and facial recognition for payment authorisation. Despite its versatility, PayEye requires merchants to deploy specialised terminals that support both biometric and traditional card payments, boosting acceptance rates.

Meanwhile, Tencent Cloud is intensifying its push into palm biometrics in Thailand. Vice‑president Jimmy Chen told the Bangkok Post that the country, backed by its “Cloud First” policy and digital transformation initiatives, makes an ideal launchpad. Tencent is collaborating with local technology firms such as MFEC and True IDC to test the system across multiple sectors, including convenience stores, retail, entertainment, education and finance. Early trials in venues like 7‑Eleven, Siam Commercial Bank, and The Mall Group underscore a focus on Thailand’s tourism-driven retail sector, where international visitors may welcome a card- or cash-free experience.

Tencent Cloud’s palm recognition has already been implemented in China at Beijing Airport Express, Shenzhen University, and numerous 7‑Eleven outlets. The system uses infrared imaging to analyse both surface palm lines and the vein network beneath the skin. Data is encrypted and stored with irreversible transformation to safeguard privacy. The architecture integrates local data centres—in Thailand’s case—with no cross-border transfers, aligning with regulatory frameworks. Analysts from GlobalData suggest that if the trials succeed, Thailand could become the gateway for adoption across Indonesia and Malaysia, offering scalability and enhanced security compared with fingerprint or facial recognition.

The initiative follows earlier pilot projects: Tencent partnered with Visa in Singapore in November 2024 during the Fintech Festival, allowing DBS, OCBC and UOB cardholders to enrol palm biometrics at café POS terminals and make payments thereafter through voice‑free palm scans. Tencent’s palm system, recognised with a Fintech Excellence Award in Singapore, reportedly supports transaction speeds within a second, even under poor lighting or wet conditions.

In Southeast Asia, Alipay’s PL1 palm scanner is already deployed across several markets. PL1 requires users to enrol their palm lines and vein data, then allows tap‑free transactions at metro gates, buses and retail outlets. The competitive landscape also includes Amazon’s Whole Foods adoption of palm scan technology in the US and pilot programmes by J.P. Morgan and Mastercard for palm‑based checkout systems.