News related to
should

Global stock markets continue to experience significant losses, with sharp declines across major indices in Asia and other regions. The ongoing sell-off in equities has been driven by a combination of factors, including rising fears surrounding the stability of the global economy and concerns over the sustainability of the recent surge in artificial intelligence investments. These developments have raised alarm among investors, who are now bracing for the potential consequences of an AI bubble burst. As shares in major companies tumble, analysts are warning that the broader market could face deeper turmoil if the situation continues to deteriorate.

The volatility began when shares in leading technology firms, particularly in the AI sector, showed signs of weakness. Companies such as Google, Microsoft, and NVIDIA, which have heavily invested in AI technologies, saw substantial declines in their stock prices. Google’s CEO, Sundar Pichai, joined the growing chorus of voices warning that no company, regardless of its size or industry, would be immune if the AI-driven bubble were to burst. His remarks have further heightened concerns about the potential risks associated with the rapid adoption of AI technologies in various sectors, from finance to healthcare and manufacturing.

The sell-off has not been limited to just tech stocks. Broader market indices have also suffered, with the MSCI Asia-Pacific Index recording steep losses. Investors are particularly focused on the outlook for interest rates, as central banks, especially the Federal Reserve, have indicated that they will continue their tightening policies to combat inflation. This uncertainty regarding monetary policy has contributed to the risk-off sentiment, leading many investors to retreat from stocks and other risk assets.

Compounding the situation, the price of bitcoin, a barometer for risk appetite, has fallen to a seven-month low, reflecting the broader pullback from riskier assets. The digital currency, which had seen impressive gains earlier in the year, has now become a symbol of the broader unease in global financial markets. Its drop has triggered additional concerns, with some market participants fearing that the crypto market’s downturn could further exacerbate the sell-off in traditional equities.

The economic uncertainty has been exacerbated by geopolitical tensions, including the ongoing trade disputes between major economies, rising energy prices, and concerns over global supply chains. These factors have combined to create a perfect storm for investors, who are now facing mounting pressure to reassess their portfolios and risk exposures.

Corporate earnings reports are also under scrutiny, with many firms expected to report weaker-than-expected results due to higher input costs and slowing demand. Companies that had previously benefited from the pandemic-driven digital transformation, such as e-commerce giants and cloud computing providers, are now seeing their growth rates slow down. This slowdown is further contributing to the negative sentiment surrounding the stock market.

As the stock market sell-off continues, experts are advising caution and suggesting that investors should prepare for continued volatility in the months ahead. Some are calling for a reassessment of the risk associated with high-growth sectors, particularly those heavily reliant on AI technologies, while others recommend diversification to protect against potential downturns.

By Nitya Chakraborty The NDA led by the BJP has swept the assembly polls in Bihar stunning the RJD and the other constituents of the INDIA Bloc by the extent of the win of the NDA constituents in the 243 member state assembly. The initial results till this afternoon indicate that the NDA has got […]

The article INDIA Bloc Must Take Proper Lessons From Big Jolt In Bihar Assembly Polls appeared first on Latest India news, analysis and reports on Newspack by India Press Agency).

By Nantoo Banerjee It is difficult to grasp the fact that even 78 years after its independence, India, the world’s most populous country, continues to be heavily dependent on imported fertilizer to produce crops to feed its 1.46 billion-plus population. The prospect of a sudden fertiliser price surge ahead of its most important Rabi (winter) […]

The article Fertiliser Import Price Surge May Hit India’s Rabi Crop Output appeared first on Latest India news, analysis and reports on Newspack by India Press Agency).

The U. S. Treasury Department is advancing its legislative plans for the Stablecoin Payments Regulation Act, which has sparked a significant disagreement between cryptocurrency exchange Coinbase and the traditional banking sector. The controversy centers on a provision within the proposed regulation that would restrict the payment of interest on stablecoins.

Coinbase, a leading cryptocurrency platform, has expressed strong opposition to a proposed ban on interest payments. According to Coinbase, such a ban should apply solely to issuers of stablecoins, who manage the supply of these digital currencies. The company argues that exchanges like Coinbase, which merely facilitate transactions and do not control the issuance of stablecoins, should not be subject to the same restrictions. Coinbase’s position is that the distinction between issuers and exchanges is crucial for maintaining the stability and growth of the broader cryptocurrency market.

However, traditional banking associations have raised concerns about the broader implications of stablecoins in the financial system. These groups advocate for a blanket ban on paying interest on stablecoins, extending this prohibition to exchanges and any affiliates involved in their handling. According to these banking bodies, allowing exchanges to pay interest on stablecoins would create an uneven playing field and could lead to significant disruptions in the traditional banking sector. One of their primary concerns is the potential for bank deposit outflows, as consumers may be drawn to the higher interest rates that stablecoins could offer compared to traditional savings accounts.

Stablecoins, which are pegged to traditional fiat currencies like the U. S. dollar, are increasingly becoming a popular method of storing and transferring value within the cryptocurrency ecosystem. These digital assets are known for their stability, making them an attractive alternative to more volatile cryptocurrencies such as Bitcoin or Ethereum. However, the potential for exchanges to offer interest payments on stablecoins raises concerns about the stability of the broader financial system, particularly in the face of growing interest in digital assets.

The clash between Coinbase and banking associations highlights the tension between the rapidly evolving world of digital assets and the more established, regulated financial institutions. Coinbase’s position reflects a broader trend within the cryptocurrency industry to resist overly restrictive regulations that could stifle innovation. The company has long advocated for clearer regulatory guidelines that would allow digital currencies to thrive within the traditional financial ecosystem, rather than be treated as a separate, isolated entity.

On the other hand, traditional banks have been cautious about the rise of digital assets, particularly stablecoins. These institutions argue that the lack of comprehensive regulation for stablecoins creates potential risks for consumers and the financial system. Banks are concerned that if exchanges are allowed to pay interest on stablecoins, it could trigger a shift of funds away from bank deposits into digital currencies, potentially eroding the deposit base that banks rely on to lend and conduct other financial activities. They also warn that offering interest could lead to increased speculative activity, which could ultimately undermine the stability of the financial system.

Bitcoin’s fair value, according to JPMorgan Chase, should be as high as $170,000, based on a model that compares it to gold’s market role. The investment bank argues that Bitcoin should represent two-thirds of gold’s private investment base, a significant increase from its current value of approximately $102,000 per Bitcoin.

JPMorgan’s analysis draws from its long-standing views on digital assets and traditional commodities, asserting that Bitcoin is on a path to becoming an essential part of the global investment portfolio, particularly among institutional investors. The bank’s model incorporates risk capital metrics and examines the private investment demand for both Bitcoin and gold. As more institutional investors seek exposure to digital assets, Bitcoin is increasingly seen as a hedge against traditional financial uncertainties.

According to the model, Bitcoin’s rise aligns with the expanding use of blockchain technology and cryptocurrencies as a store of value, much like gold has functioned for centuries. This comparison has gained traction, particularly as Bitcoin’s network effects and its decentralized structure differentiate it from other assets. JPMorgan believes that Bitcoin’s potential growth is rooted in its ability to scale and the growing adoption of cryptocurrencies in the financial system.

While Bitcoin’s market capitalisation currently lags behind gold, JPMorgan’s model suggests that it could capture a significant portion of the gold market, primarily in the realm of private investment. The bank’s forecast is based on the assumption that Bitcoin will continue to prove its resilience and utility as an asset, making it increasingly attractive to both institutional and retail investors alike. JPMorgan’s analysis takes into account Bitcoin’s volatile price history, yet the bank remains optimistic about its long-term potential as the digital asset continues to mature.

The bank’s prediction of a $170,000 fair value for Bitcoin is a sharp contrast to its current trading price, which fluctuates in the $30,000 to $35,000 range. However, JPMorgan notes that such a valuation is achievable if Bitcoin continues to gain market share from traditional assets like gold, especially as demand for hedging against inflation and economic uncertainty rises. Additionally, the introduction of Bitcoin ETFs and other investment products could help bridge the gap between digital currencies and mainstream financial markets, facilitating broader adoption.

For JPMorgan, Bitcoin’s fair value also hinges on broader regulatory developments. While the US and other countries have begun to establish clearer regulatory frameworks for cryptocurrencies, the landscape remains uncertain, which could impact Bitcoin’s trajectory. However, JPMorgan suggests that clearer regulations could bring more institutional investors into the space, providing further support for Bitcoin’s long-term growth.

JPMorgan’s bullish outlook on Bitcoin comes amid a broader market trend where digital assets, particularly Bitcoin and Ethereum, are becoming integral to the portfolios of both retail and institutional investors. This shift is propelled by growing recognition of the asset class’s potential to diversify traditional investment portfolios and provide exposure to the evolving digital economy. The rise of decentralized finance platforms and the increasing use of blockchain technology in various industries have helped position Bitcoin as a viable alternative to traditional store-of-value assets like gold.

Bitcoin’s integration into the financial ecosystem is also supported by advancements in blockchain infrastructure and the growing acceptance of cryptocurrencies in various sectors, from payments to banking to supply chain management. As these applications expand, Bitcoin is poised to become a more integral component of financial markets, reinforcing JPMorgan’s argument that its fair value could reach $170,000.

The group led by Air France‑KLM has announced that its Dutch subsidiary KLM Royal Dutch Airlines is under significant pressure as rising charges at Amsterdam’s Schiphol Airport and broad inflation in the Netherlands compel a strategic review of the carrier’s business model. Chief Executive Officer Ben Smith confirmed that “all options are on the table,” noting that the carrier needs to adjust aircraft numbers, fleet types, destinations and staffing to protect profitability.

Group results for the third quarter of 2025 showed an operating profit of €1.203 billion, with an operating margin of 13.1 per cent on revenues of €9.2 billion. While passenger numbers rose 4.7 per cent year-on-year to 29.2 million, unit revenue fell slightly by 0.5 per cent, driven by weaker cargo yields and low-cost operations. The results underscore the contrast between growth in traffic and growing cost headwinds.

KLM, based in the Netherlands and anchored at Schiphol, is especially impacted by local cost escalation. Airport fees at Schiphol jumped by 41 per cent in 2025, the sharpest increase among major European hubs, with KLM publicly calling the rise “unreasonable and unwise”. The carrier is also dealing with inflation-related wage and maintenance cost growth, and declining demand on trans-Atlantic routes.

Smith emphasised that despite the encouraging group-level numbers, KLM’s cost base demands structural adjustment. The carrier must better align capacity with demand, rationalise fleet composition and improve productivity in order to align with the group’s broader “premiumisation” strategy that emphasises long-haul and premium-cabin growth.

Analysts observe that KLM’s challenges reflect a wider trend in the European airline industry, where legacy carriers are grappling with elevated airport charges, staffing pressures and higher regulatory burdens. In KLM’s case, this has triggered management to explore “all levers” including fleet contraction, network rebalancing and even staff reductions. Union leaders and employee groups will be closely monitoring any announcements on workforce adjustments.

From the group’s vantage point, the operational resilience of Air France and its low-cost subsidiary Transavia provide some buffer. For example, the premium cabins at both carriers continue to outperform, supporting higher yields. But the cost pressures at KLM threaten to dilute this upside. With unit costs increasing and revenue growth modest, the margin dynamics at KLM are now a key risk factor for the entire group’s profitability outlook.

Regulatory and competitive contexts complicate the path ahead. Schiphol’s high fees make it less attractive compared with other European hubs and could drive traffic to rivals. That undermines KLM’s hub-based model. At the same time, global demand uncertainties—particularly for business travel to the United States—add another layer of complexity to the group’s planning.

KLM is now said to be accelerating its reviews of aircraft utilisation, evaluating whether older, less efficient models should be retired sooner and whether some routes should be scaled back or handed to Transavia or other affiliates. Management expects that such changes will take time to yield full benefits, while the cost drag remains in place in the interim.

A prominent figure in the cryptocurrency world, Michael Saylor, has publicly declared that Bitcoin is “on sale”, signalling both bullish conviction and market caution in one of the most high-profile corporate crypto strategies. Saylor’s remarks, made via social-media post, come as Bitcoin slipped below the US $100,000 mark and as corporate and institutional appetite for the asset undergoes intense scrutiny.

Saylor, executive chairman of Strategy Inc., posted the phrase “₿itcoin on Sale” on his account, highlighting a rare moment of acquisition opportunity in his view. That post coincided with Bitcoin’s price retreat to just over US $103,000, following a sharp drop from its earlier peak above US $126,000. His firm continues to amass holdings at an average cost far below current market levels, reinforcing his narrative of seizing value amid volatility.

The strategy deployed by Saylor’s company remains centred on treating Bitcoin as a treasury asset rather than a speculative bet. Strategy now holds tens of billions of dollars worth of Bitcoin and has publicly declared an intention not to liquidate those holdings. Analysts estimate that the company faces around US $689 million in annual obligations—dividends, interest and operating costs—that will need to be met without selling crypto holdings. Failure to meet those obligations could force asset sales, but so far the company expects to service its debt and dividend commitments through equity issuance and other financing mechanisms rather than Bitcoin liquidation.

Saylor has reiterated a long-term price target of around US $150,000 for Bitcoin by the end of 2025, citing institutional demand, limited supply and the “digital gold” narrative that underpins his thesis. While that target remains ambitious, it signals the degree to which Strategy is doubling down on a one-asset treasury model. The company’s stock continues to trade at a significant premium to its net Bitcoin holdings, a premium build on investor belief in Saylor’s ability to deliver accretion of Bitcoin per share over time.

Market sentiment, however, tells a more cautious story. Bitcoin’s drop below US $100,000 has triggered outflows from spot-Bitcoin ETFs in the United States exceeding US $1.3 billion, according to data providers. At the same time, Strategy’s own valuation now absorbs significant risk: should Bitcoin stagnate or decline, the company’s heavy reliance on equity issuance to meet its obligations exposes existing shareholders to dilution. Critics such as prominent short-seller James Chanos have labelled the model “financial gibberish”, arguing that investors would be better off buying Bitcoin directly rather than trusting a leveraged equity vehicle.

Still, Strategy retains a cadre of committed supporters who believe the model is defensible if Bitcoin enters a sustained phase of adoption. Analysts covering the company have reaffirmed “buy” ratings and note that Saylor’s team does not appear to be slowing its accumulation of Bitcoin. That continued accumulation supports the “scarcity” argument Saylor advances, namely that corporate and institutional hoarding will reduce the available float and push prices higher.

The broader market context underscores the tension between optimism and caution. Bitcoin proponents emphasise macroeconomic factors such as inflation hedging, central-bank balance-sheet expansion and quantitative easing as tailwinds. Detractors point to regulatory risk, rising interest rates, and the possibility that the current cycle may be peaking or entering a correction phase. Within that dynamic Saylor’s “on sale” statement serves both as a rallying cry and a courageous public stance in a volatile landscape.

By Nitya Chakraborty The historic victory of the Democratic socialist candidate Zohran Mamdani in New York mayoral elections on November 4 night is acting as a big booster, not only to the left wingers in the Democratic Party belonging to the Bernie Sanders group, but also to the left parties in Europe and Latin America. […]

The article Zohran Mamdani’s Victory As New York Mayor Has Given A Big Boost To Global Left appeared first on Latest India news, analysis and reports on Newspack by India Press Agency).

By TN Ashok NEW  YORK:When the polls closed at 9 p.m. on Tuesday, November 4, 2025, it took less than 40 minutes for the Associated Press to call the race. Zohran Mamdani, a 34-year-old democratic socialist and state assemblyman from Queens, had accomplished what many considered impossible just a year earlier: he defeated Andrew Cuomo—twice—to […]

The article The Mamdani Moment: A Political Earthquake In America’s Largest City appeared first on Latest India news, analysis and reports on Newspack by India Press Agency).