News related to
Tech

Global alternative asset manager KKR & Co. has inaugurated a new office within the Abu Dhabi Global Market financial district, marking a significant expansion of its Middle East footprint. The office will be led by Julian Barratt‑Due, Managing Director and Head of Middle East Investing at KKR, with David Petraeus serving as Chairman of KKR Middle East, reinforcing the firm’s commitment to the region.

KKR’s decision underscores its confidence in Abu Dhabi as a gateway for global capital targeting the Gulf region. With assets under management totalling around US$720 billion, the firm already operates hubs in Dubai’s DIFC and Riyadh and views ADGM as a strategic next step.

The Abu Dhabi office aims to enhance KKR’s capacity to serve institutional clients and invest in a range of sectors including infrastructure, technology, and alternative assets across the Gulf. The move aligns with the firm’s broader strategy of partnering for long-duration assets in the region, as evidenced by its acquisition of a minority stake in ADNOC Gas Pipeline Assets LLC and investment commitments in the data centre platform Gulf Data Hub.

Abu Dhabi’s appeal lies in its stable economic foundations, regulatory clarity via ADGM’s common-law framework, and its ambition to become a major global financial centre. ADGM emphasised that KKR’s arrival reflects the city’s expanding role in the global investment ecosystem.

From KKR’s perspective, the firm has stated that the new presence will enable closer collaboration with regional partners and enhance responsiveness to market opportunities. The leadership structure signals that KKR is aiming for a long-term, on-the-ground commitment rather than a passive regional representation.

This move comes amid a broader industry trend of asset managers shifting focus toward the Gulf region. Firms such as PGIM have previously opened offices in ADGM, responding to abundant regional capital, favourable tax regimes, and dynamic infrastructure programmes.

Investors highlight that the Gulf markets are undergoing structural transformation, driven by diversification away from hydrocarbon dependence, growth of digital economies and infrastructure modernisation. KKR’s investments in energy and data-centre platforms illustrate how global managers are aligning with those shifts.

For Abu Dhabi, the addition of a major player like KKR bolsters its ambition to attract global financial services and alternative-capital players. ADGM’s track record of rising company registrations and assets under management suggests the jurisdiction is gaining momentum.

However, experts caution that competition is intensifying: neighbouring hubs such as Dubai and Riyadh are also targeting global managers, meaning KKR and similar firms will need to demonstrate differentiated value-propositions to win deal flow and client mandates. Some analysts note that while large sovereign wealth funds in the region remain dominant allocators, attracting third-party capital remains a challenge.

Operationally, establishing a local hub brings costs, regulatory obligations and talent-acquisition hurdles. While KKR cites its established regional presence and leadership under Petraeus and Barratt-Due as advantages, execution will be scrutinised by investors seeking measurable regional capital deployment and returns.

In the context of broader global asset-management dynamics, the Gulf real-assets market offers long-term, low-yield, inflation-hedged opportunities—an appealing counterbalance to the high-rate, equity-valued portfolios that dominate Europe and North America. KKR appears to be positioning itself to capture that shift, reinforcing its global expansion strategy.

A pact between SkyGrid and High Lander has been signed at the Dubai Airshow 2025 to construct a framework for advanced air-mobility operations in the United Arab Emirates, focusing on integrating crewed and uncrewed aerial vehicles. The memorandum of understanding calls for development of airspace management ecosystems, digital operations for electric vertical take-off and landing aircraft and cargo drones, vertiport planning and cybersecurity protocols. SkyGrid, headquartered in Austin, Texas, acts as a third-party service provider for advanced air mobility operations, while High Lander offers unmanned traffic-management and drone-fleet-management solutions. The deal is part of the UAE’s ambition to position Abu Dhabi as a hub for next-generation aviation services.

Under the agreement the firms will jointly assess “Advanced Air Mobility Supporting Operational Environments” to develop technology road-maps and regulatory frameworks that facilitate scalable AAM operations. The collaboration targets areas including airspace integration, enabling vertiport infrastructure, securing digital operations and ensuring safe coexistence of crewed and uncrewed aircraft. SkyGrid chief executive Jia Xu said the alliance “represents a significant milestone in shaping the digital foundation of Advanced Air Mobility in the UAE and across the Middle East”. High Lander’s chief executive Alon Abelson commented that the environment in the UAE, supported by major aerospace players, constitutes “the perfect environment to demonstrate how automation, data-driven management and cross-industry collaboration can transform the future of air mobility”.

Analysis of this partnership places it amid a broader global push for uncrewed traffic-management systems and urban or regional air-mobility networks. Industry research shows that UTM ecosystems are considered vital for the safe scaling of commercial beyond-visual-line-of-sight drone operations. A 2024 readiness index issued by the Global UTM Association named both companies among participants in task forces shaping digital airspace adoption worldwide. That makes this UAE-based partnership a concrete step from theoretical planning to operational readiness.

The UAE’s Economic Vision 2030 describes diversification into technology, aerospace and transport as key pillars. The SkyGrid–High Lander partnership explicitly links with these goals, signalling industry-scale intentions rather than pilot programmes alone. By creating a unified operational blueprint, regulators and operators in the Gulf region may be asked to adapt their air-space classification, licensing and infrastructure regimes. Implementation will still depend on national aviation regulator approvals, air-traffic-management integrations, and standards alignment with international frameworks.

Despite the ambition, challenges remain. Data-sharing protocols across crewed and uncrewed systems must meet stringent safety and cybersecurity standards. Vertiport infrastructure—dedicated landing and take-off sites for eVTOL vehicles—is still nascent globally and will require investment and spatial planning, especially in congested urban zones. Moreover, global certification regimes for eVTOLs and unmanned systems are evolving; regulatory uncertainty may slow deployment. Analysts caution that while the Gulf region offers less airspace congestion than some metropolitan centres, integration of new aircraft types must still ensure separation from traditional air-traffic flows.

Beijing has initiated sweeping agricultural trade measures targeting the United States, Canada and the European Union as a means to counter duties imposed on Chinese electric vehicles. The move centres on sectors worth billions of dollars in export value and signals a new front in the global tariff standoff as Chinese factories ramp up global auto-sales ambitions.

According to official announcements and industry trackers, China imposed tariffs and import restrictions on major agricultural products including soybeans, pork, canola and cognac after Western governments raised tariffs on Chinese EV imports—some reaching 100 per cent in the US, and up to 35 per cent in the EU. Those duties stemmed from concerns about subsidised manufacturing, imports displacing domestic output and national-security implications tied to EV supply-chains.

One Chinese commercial diplomat told Canadian media that Ottawa’s export restraints on Chinese EVs directly triggered Beijing’s agriculture penalties. Canadian farmers in canola and pulses markets have already seen orders plummet and export corridors shut or taxed heavily. European spirits producers also face duties: cognac exports to China, valued at around $1.7 billion annually, have dropped by about 35 per cent since the levy took effect.

Analysts say the strategy is calculated. While China’s domestic market remains protected from full import competition, its international agriculture import volumes give Beijing leverage. An academic at Peking University noted that “a slight adjustment in China’s import preferences can ripple through farming regions and rural constituencies that carry significant political weight”. By focusing on sectors with concentrated politically-sensitive producers, China increases the pressure on Western governments to reconsider EV levies.

On the Western side, officials are signalling that they are unlikely to surrender their EV-tariff stance. A senior analyst at a Brussels-based think-tank said that the European Commission had “clearly shown that it was not willing to back down from the EV case”, citing China’s rapid auto-industry progress and state-support programmes. With climate targets and supply-chain security on the table, Western capitals view EV tariffs as integral to domestic industry viability.

Yet the backlash in agriculture could be deeper and more enduring than the EV duties themselves. A supply-chain expert explained that new contracts, logistics investments and alternative-buyer relationships developed in response to Chinese import suspensions may lock in shifts for years to come. In concrete terms, U. S. soybean farmers—who sold $12.6 billion worth to China in 2024—have seen export volumes fall to zero for key new-crop shipments, while Canadian producers of rapeseed and pea oil are facing a near-complete market closure under 100 per cent tariffs.

Observers point out that agriculture is an especially potent tool in trade diplomacy because it touches multiple layers of the economy: from regional employment to global commodity markets and corporate finances. By wielding farm-product bans or tariffs, Beijing can inflict political damage in sending countries while avoiding direct escalation of high-tech sectors where Western governments might respond more aggressively.

For Western farm sectors the choices are stark. Some firms are exploring alternative markets in Latin America, Africa or South-East Asia, while others are pressing their governments for compensation or trade-negotiation efforts. Meanwhile, Western trade officials are increasingly emphasising diversification of supply-chains away from China, which may dampen China’s leverage over time.

A new cyber-innovation centre has been unveiled to tackle evolving digital threats with advanced technology. The Vyuha Labs – Cyber Innovation Hub, launched through a partnership between International Institute of Information Technology, Hyderabad and the Telangana Cyber Security Bureau, will bring together academia, industry and law-enforcement to co-develop deep-tech tools aimed at strengthening cyber-security infrastructure. The facility spans more than 3,000 sq ft and is equipped with specialist infrastructure to prototype solutions for crime analytics, fraud detection and forensic processing.

The core mission of the hub is to convert early-stage research into deployable products that serve policing and digital safety needs. IIIT-H Director Prof Sandeep Shukla noted that simply publishing academic papers is not sufficient; the institution aims to hand over viable technologies to start-ups or third-party companies for implementation and scaling. TGCSB Director Shikha Goel emphasised that innovation-led solutions are the only effective route to stay ahead of threat actors, citing a decline in cyber-crime incidents within Telangana even as national levels have surged.

One of the flagship initiatives within the hub is an automatic processing system for distress-call data gathered via the 1930 helpline. Leveraging IIIT-H’s language-technology centre, the system converts voice calls into written transcripts, applies machine-learning algorithms to detect patterns and flags hotspots of criminal activity—shifting the approach from reactive logging to proactive intelligence generation. Another major effort focuses on financial-fraud analytics: mining citizen-complaint and transaction data to track investment-scam and cryptocurrency-fraud trends and to evaluate policing interventions for effectiveness. A third component addresses computer-vision based forensic tracking through camera-feed analysis and automated suspect-movement detection, part of a longer-term plan to enhance digital-evidence workflows.

The strategic positioning of Vyuha Labs reflects a broader shift in how cyber-crime is being addressed. Rather than centralised national agencies alone, regional hubs are emerging that bring together local police forces, technical research institutes and private-sector partners for agile innovation and deployment. TGCSB’s claim of an 11 per cent fall in cyber-crime within Telangana, even as 37 per cent growth was recorded nationally, is cited as evidence of the model’s early promise. The facility is housed within IIIT-H’s Cyber Manthan wing, signalling a formal institutional route from research through incubation to real-world solution delivery.

Start-ups and industry play a crucial role in this ecosystem. According to project chief executive Rajul Negi, the lab aims to hand off matured research to start-ups or established companies, thereby ensuring proper deployment, maintenance and scalability across multiple jurisdictions at lower cost than traditional agencies. For example, the language-tech solution being built for call-transcription is expected to be transferred to a young company that can manage ongoing updates, user-interface enhancements and multi-state rollout. Prof Shukla stated that the academic institution intends to remain focused on core research while leveraging partner entities for full product development.

Observers point to several challenges the initiative must overcome. Translating academic proof-of-concepts into field-ready tools often encounters issues of interoperability with existing police systems, budget constraints for rollout and the need for ongoing technical support and upgrades. The policing ecosystem may also need training and culture change to absorb deep-tech workflows rather than legacy manual processes. Moreover, while the state hub model can address local threats, coordination with national agencies and cross-border crime networks remains a complex demand.

India’s workforce is entering a critical phase as artificial intelligence reshapes job markets and industry demands, with upskilling emerging as a non-negotiable necessity for both individuals and organisations. According to a recent assessment of the Asia-Pacific region, India needs to scale up its skilling efforts rapidly to avoid falling behind in the global AI marathon. A report by Asian Development Bank and Google. org warns that without accessible AI-skilling initiatives, large segments of the workforce risk being left out of the transition.

The country already boasts one of the youngest and fastest-growing workforces in the world, offering a potential advantage in the AI era. Yet the report highlights a mismatch: numerous workers in labour-intensive sectors such as textiles, manufacturing and logistics perform roles with high automation risk — for example data-entry, scheduling and support functions — and these roles are disproportionately held by women and informal workers. With AI-driven automation advancing quickly, these groups could be among the hardest hit unless targeted training interventions are introduced.

Data published by NASSCOM indicates that India’s existing AI talent pool, estimated at around 600,000 today, must expand to more than 1.2 million by 2027 to fill expected demand—implying a shortfall of more than a million skilled professionals. This gap emerges despite the country producing hundreds of thousands of engineering graduates each year. Industry trackers indicate that more than half the workforce in technology services is already undergoing training in AI, machine learning and related domains, yet skills still lag employer expectations.

Business research from Microsoft found that across Indian organisations two-thirds of employees and four-fifths of leaders are now familiar with AI agents. Within the next 12-18 months more than half of these companies will place upskilling at the top of their agenda, and more than half expect AI training to become a core team responsibility within five years. These trends confirm that industry demand is ahead of the skill supply curve.

Beyond technical expertise, new job roles are emerging. Organisations are recruiting for “AI Workflow Designers”, “Software Operators” and multi-agent system builders. The most vulnerable workers are those in roles focused on infrastructure management, manual testing, and basic coding — positions that technology is already beginning to automate. This points to an imperative for current employees to acquire cross-functional, human-centric skills such as critical thinking, adaptability and collaboration with AI.

Educational institutions and vocational training providers are responding. For example, an initiative at Andhra University in partnership with NASSCOM integrates advanced skill modules into non-engineering streams and appoints department-wise coordinators to ensure student readiness. The move reflects recognition that skilling must extend beyond traditional tech fields to arts and sciences, and must address digital literacy gaps.

Nonetheless, major structural obstacles remain. A digital divide persists: only about one in five young adults in some South Asian regions has reliable internet access at home, limiting participation in online skilling programmes. Language barriers and low digital literacy further hamper effective engagement. Informal-sector workers, who often lack formal training and social protections, face a double risk of displacement without clear pathways into higher-value work.

The informal economy accounts for a large share of India’s employment, and workers in this segment are often overlooked in skill-development policies. Analysts warn that unless training programmes are redesigned for accessibility — offering tailored formats for women re-entering the workforce, rural populations and digitally disadvantaged groups — AI adoption may deepen existing inequalities.

Malaysia’s national utility firm Tenaga Nasional Berhad recorded losses of about RM 4.57 billion stemming from illegal electricity usage linked to cryptocurrency-mining operations between 2020 and August 2025. The Ministry of Energy Transition and Water Transformation disclosed that 13,827 premises were identified for unauthorised power use in bitcoin-mining setups.

The scale of the issue has triggered coordinated action by TNB alongside law-enforcement agencies, the communications regulator and the anti-corruption commission to shut down illegal crypto-mining hubs and recover mining equipment. Monitoring and detection systems have been upgraded, including the deployment of smart meters and a database of suspect premises created to track owner-tenant information.

The ministry emphasised that tampering with electricity meters or bypassing supply connections remains a breach of the Electricity Supply Act, even though crypto-mining per se is not illegal in Malaysia provided it meets regulatory registration, environmental assessment and energy-efficiency requirements.

Experts note that large-scale crypto-mining demands heavy and continuous power consumption, making utilities vulnerable to theft and grid stress. Analysts warn that if unaddressed, rampant unauthorised mining can undermine revenue streams, force higher tariffs for compliant users and increase risk of transformer or grid overload. TNB has reported that illicit mining not only deprives the utility of revenue, but often leaves behind damaged equipment, fire hazards and voltage instability.

TNB’s response includes launching a pilot “Distribution Transformer Meter” project that monitors usage at the transformer level to detect anomalies, and rolling out smart-metering at substations for real-time tracking of energy flows. These technical steps complement legal and enforcement action, with the utility and authorities conducting raids, seizing mining machines, and pursuing criminal charges under offences related to meter interference.

Regulators say the problem is acute because of Malaysia’s relatively affordable electricity and benign regulatory regime for data-centres, making it an attractive venue for crypto-miners operating on razor-thin margins for global digital-asset mining operations. Observers say tighter regulation globally of crypto-mining, along with rising power costs, have driven more miners to jurisdictions with weaker enforcement or cheaper energy. This trend adds urgency for utilities worldwide to bolster monitoring and enforcement frameworks.

The cryptocurrency futures market experienced a significant wave of forced liquidations, amounting to $1.03 billion over the past 24 hours. A considerable portion of the liquidations occurred in long positions, totaling $725 million, while $305 million worth of short positions were also closed.

The dramatic liquidations were triggered by volatile market movements, which saw sharp price fluctuations across multiple digital assets. These price swings were exacerbated by shifts in market sentiment, which contributed to the rapid unwinding of leveraged positions. The forced liquidations come amid a broader backdrop of market uncertainty, as traders adjust their positions in response to global economic factors and the ongoing regulatory scrutiny of the cryptocurrency sector.

A notable driver of the sell-off was the high level of leverage employed by market participants. Crypto futures markets, particularly those offering derivatives with high leverage, often see sharp price corrections as a result of large liquidation events. When asset prices move against traders’ positions, forced liquidations can amplify the price movements, resulting in cascading effects that further destabilize the market.

This liquidations event reflects the high-risk nature of trading in the cryptocurrency space, especially with the volatile price action witnessed in major tokens such as Bitcoin, Ethereum, and other altcoins. Market analysts note that a significant portion of these liquidations occurred as Bitcoin’s price struggled to maintain momentum, dipping below key support levels. Other altcoins, including Ethereum and Solana, also saw substantial price corrections, which intensified the market’s turmoil.

While the forced liquidations have had a short-term destabilising effect, many market observers suggest that they may serve to recalibrate market positions, potentially clearing out overleveraged traders. However, the long-term implications for the market remain unclear. Crypto futures markets are known for their volatility, which can often result in sudden price movements, leaving traders vulnerable to unexpected liquidations during sharp corrections.

The level of forced liquidations seen in this event underscores the risks associated with high-leverage trading, particularly in a market as volatile as cryptocurrencies. As more traders flock to these markets, seeking greater profits from leveraged positions, such liquidations will likely become a recurring feature in the digital asset landscape.

Despite these liquidations, some analysts argue that the broader trend in the crypto market remains positive, with institutional adoption and growing interest from mainstream investors continuing to support long-term bullish prospects. They point to the increasing recognition of cryptocurrencies as a viable asset class, with traditional financial institutions exploring ways to integrate blockchain technology and crypto assets into their services.

On the other hand, the market faces significant regulatory challenges, particularly in key jurisdictions such as the United States and Europe. Governmental authorities have expressed concerns over the potential for market manipulation, fraud, and the lack of investor protection in the largely unregulated crypto space. These regulatory uncertainties add another layer of complexity to the market, as traders weigh the risks of entering a space with evolving rules and regulations.

At the same time, some proponents of cryptocurrency markets argue that forced liquidations and market volatility are simply part of the growing pains of a maturing market. They note that as liquidity improves and market participants become more sophisticated, the frequency and intensity of these liquidation events may diminish over time.