News related to
data

VTB — Russia’s second-largest bank by assets — has announced plans to allow its clients to directly buy, sell and hold cryptocurrencies through its brokerage accounts starting in 2026. The move was disclosed by the head of its brokerage services at an investment conference in Moscow, signalling a shift from derivatives-based crypto exposure toward full asset-level trading.

At present, VTB already offers clients access to cryptocurrency derivatives. The planned service would enable investors to acquire digital assets such as Bitcoin through regular investment or brokerage accounts once regulatory approval is secured. The bank is canvassing regulators and expects authorisation to come through within months.

This development comes against a broader backdrop of rapid evolution in Russia’s digital-asset infrastructure. The Moscow Exchange has recently launched ruble-settled Bitcoin futures and other crypto-linked instruments for institutional investors — part of a broader effort to open new investment channels under carefully structured legal regimes.

Under the current regulatory framework, only “specially qualified” investors — those with high net worth or significant annual income — can directly engage in cryptocurrencies. VTB’s new offering may broaden participation beyond derivatives and institutional-only vehicles, assuming the financial regulator approves the shift.

For VTB, the initiative represents a diversification of its services at a time when Russian banks face mounting pressures. The bank is grappling with new capital requirements imposed by the Central Bank of Russia, which its chief has described as a major challenge going forward.

By Dr. Gyan Pathak When Indian rupee was falling in the Mumbai market against US dollar on Wednesday, December 3, 2023 – sliding past the 90-a-dollar mark for the second day, plumbing a new low of 90.29 in the morning trade after opening flat at 89.96, analysts were pegging the next level for the beleaguered […]

The article CEA’s Calmness Over Steep Fall Of Rupee Ignores Key Risks To India appeared first on Latest India news, analysis and reports on Newspack by India Press Agency).

Saudi energy giant Saudi Aramco has begun output from the first phase of its vast Jafurah gas field, signalling a major milestone in the Kingdom’s shift toward natural gas. The project, valued at around $100 billion, has an initial production capacity of 450 million cubic feet per day, according to the Saudi Finance Ministry’s 2026 budget statement.

The field holds an estimated 229 trillion standard cubic feet of raw gas along with 75 billion stock tank barrels of condensate—making Jafurah the largest non-associated gas development in Saudi Arabia and among the largest shale-gas plays outside the United States.

Completion of the first development phase allows Aramco to begin supplying sales gas domestically. The company plans to ramp production gradually and aims to reach a sustainable output of 2 billion cubic feet per day by 2030.

To support its gas-processing infrastructure, Aramco earlier sealed an $11 billion lease-and-leaseback agreement with a consortium led by Global Infrastructure Partners, part of BlackRock. Under the deal, a newly formed subsidiary, Jafurah Midstream Gas Company, will lease the processing and fractionation facilities — which Aramco will then lease back for a 20-year period. Aramco retains majority ownership with a 51% stake, while the investor group holds 49%. The transaction is designed to inject capital without constraining production volumes.

Aramco’s move reflects a broader strategic shift. By ramping up gas production, the company aims to reduce domestic reliance on crude oil for power generation — thereby freeing more crude for export. Gas from Jafurah is expected not only to meet domestic power and utility needs but also to provide feedstock for petrochemicals, hydrogen, and potentially emerging sectors such as AI data-centres.

Analysts view Jafurah as a potential game-changer for both Saudi Arabia and global gas markets. With reserves comparable to major U. S. shale plays and a projected daily output of 2 bcf by 2030, the project could make Saudi Arabia a more prominent natural-gas exporter or LNG player — a significant rebalancing from its traditional role as an oil-dominated supplier.

Through this transformation, Aramco underlines its long-term aim of reinventing its energy portfolio — aligning with efforts to diversify the country’s economy and meet shifting global demand patterns.

The Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection has ordered Kalshi, Robinhood and Crypto. com to stop offering sports-event contracts to state residents and to allow withdrawal of all funds held on their platforms. The move puts Connecticut among a growing number of states rejecting the argument that such contracts constitute federally regulated derivatives rather than gambling.

The cease-and-desist letters cite multiple violations: the trio lacked a Connecticut sports betting licence, were offering wagers to individuals under the state’s minimum age of 21, and were targeting individuals on the state’s self-exclusion list and college campuses. Regulators flagged these practices as unfair and potentially open to insider trading, given the platforms’ broader access to events with widely known outcomes. The state warned of civil or criminal action if platforms did not comply.

The action in Connecticut comes after a series of legal defeats for Kalshi in several states. In Nevada, a federal judge ruled that Kalshi is subject to state gaming laws, rejecting its claim that only the federal Commodity Futures Trading Commission has jurisdiction over its contracts. That decision freed state regulators to enforce gaming rules against the firm. Previously, regulators in Arizona, Maryland, Illinois, Montana, Ohio and New Jersey had also issued similar orders, some of which led to ongoing litigation.

In Nevada, following the judge’s ruling, Robinhood suspended new sports-event contracts effective December 1, with Crypto. com taking a similar step. Kalshi, however, opted to appeal rather than shut down — underscoring a broader conflict over whether state gambling laws or federal derivatives regulation should govern this space.

By K Raveendran The steady erosion of trust between political parties and the Election Commission has become one of the more troubling developments in India’s democratic life, revealing an institutional drift that carries implications well beyond a single electoral cycle. The body entrusted with safeguarding the integrity of elections is expected to serve as an […]

The article An Election Commission That Treats Critics As Enemies Has No Place In Democracy appeared first on Latest India news, analysis and reports on Newspack by India Press Agency).

Emirates NBD has sealed a strategic partnership with the Dubai International Financial Centre aimed at offering enhanced wealth governance, succession planning and legacy-preservation services to ultra-high-net-worth families and family-owned enterprises. The collaboration will channel the capabilities of Emirates NBD Private Banking and the infrastructure of DIFC’s Family Wealth Centre to meet the complex needs of family businesses within the jurisdiction.

Under the agreement, Emirates NBD will provide tailored governance frameworks, succession-planning blueprints, tax structuring, and bespoke advisory services designed for clients with significant wealth or business holdings. The bank intends to complement these offerings with educational workshops, governance-best-practice programmes and family-office structuring support — all delivered through DIFC’s institutional facilities.

The move reflects growing demand in the Middle East for professionalised wealth-transfer and legacy-management solutions as substantial assets stand to pass to younger generations. Regional trends indicate about one trillion US dollars in assets are expected to be transferred within wealthy families by 2030, underscoring the urgency for robust governance structures.

United Kingdom legislation now formally recognises digital assets such as cryptocurrencies and stablecoins as personal property, offering holders protections under established property law. The Property Act 2025 — previously a bill — received royal assent, confirming that digital tokens may be treated as a third category of personal property alongside traditional “things in possession” and “things in action.” This marks a decisive shift from earlier reliance on case-by-case rulings by courts.

Legal recognition ensures that crypto-owners gain enforceable rights in instances of theft, fraud or insolvency, and enables digital assets to be included in estates or bankruptcy proceedings under the same protections afforded to conventional property. The Act does not itself define which digital assets qualify — courts will decide those details over time.

Judicial developments had already begun to lay the groundwork for this change. As early as 2019, the UK Jurisdiction Taskforce concluded that crypto-assets met criteria for property under English law: they could be defined, identified, transferred and treated as assets capable of value retention. A key case, AA v Persons Unknown, saw the High Court of England and Wales recognise Bitcoin provided as ransom in a cyber-attack as property, granting the insurer a proprietary injunction.

Advocates of the law hailed it as providing clarity long sought by individuals and businesses holding crypto-assets. CryptoUK, a leading trade body for digital assets, noted that while courts had already treated crypto as property in some cases, codifying the principle into statute removes uncertainty and streamlines legal protections across theft, insolvency and estate-related scenarios.

Legal experts say the Act reflects the recommendations laid out by the Law Commission in a 2023 report, which urged reform to ensure the law could accommodate emerging digital assets under a flexible yet robust framework. The Commission argued that existing categories of personal property under law were too rigid to account for assets that lacked physical form or contractual rights.

This statutory change arrives as UK regulators concurrently refine the broader regime for crypto-assets. Draft legislation published earlier this year already seeks to amend the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 to designate certain “qualifying cryptoassets” and “qualifying stablecoins” as regulated investments, bringing market-level rules for trading, custody and compliance under formal oversight.

While the law does not render cryptocurrency a legal tender — meaning it still cannot be used to settle debts in substitute for currency — its classification as property gives holders legal certainty over ownership and enforceable rights. Taxation and regulatory treatment will continue to follow established frameworks, though this legal milestone reduces ambiguity over the status of crypto-assets in private law contexts.

Judges, lawyers and market participants anticipate that the Act will lead to a more stable and predictable legal environment for crypto-asset ownership, enabling individuals and institutions to treat tokens with the same legal respect accorded to traditional assets. As the courts start applying the new law in real cases, the boundaries of which digital assets qualify will grow clearer — and the UK’s position as a regulatory pioneer in digital asset law will be reaffirmed.

Belgium has rejected a proposal by the European Union to channel frozen Russian assets toward a major financial aid package for Ukraine, dealing a blow to efforts aimed at sustaining Kyiv’s war-time finances. The plan envisioned a €140 billion “reparations loan,” backed by immobilised Russian central-bank reserves held largely in Belgium’s Euroclear, but Belgian leaders argued the risks are too high—legal, financial and reputational.

The opposition centres on statements from Bart De Wever, Belgium’s prime minister, who described the plan as “fundamentally flawed”. He warned that using the frozen assets at this stage could trigger lawsuits, force Belgium to shoulder massive liabilities, and destabilise confidence in the euro. De Wever rejected broad incentives offered by the European Commission and demanded legally binding guarantees from other EU member states before any commitment.

Backing Ukraine with frozen Russian funds had gained traction as European leaders scrambled to meet Kyiv’s projected needs through 2026–2027. Analysts estimate that Ukraine faces a budget shortfall of more than €135 billion over the next two years, with defence expenditures alone ballooning. The EU had considered not just using interest on the frozen assets — which has supported a G7-backed aid programme so far — but deploying the assets themselves as collateral to unlock large-scale funding.

Yet the European Central Bank has refused to provide emergency liquidity for the proposed loan, citing its mandate forbidding direct monetary financing to governments under EU treaties. The refusal undermines the viability of the scheme, especially since liquidity back-stops were meant to reassure markets and protect institutions like Euroclear from sudden liability.

Some EU member states and financial experts contended that employing frozen assets would free up taxpayer money and symbolically re-affirm Europe’s stance that Russia must pay for its aggression. Academics have pointed out how using immobilised reserves could offer Ukraine immediate relief without expanding EU sovereign debt. The Commission is reportedly exploring fallback options, such as joint borrowing backed by the EU budget or bilateral loans, but those alternatives are expected to carry higher costs and slower disbursement timelines.

Opposing countries argue the plan violates property rights, jeopardises investor confidence and could provoke Russian retaliation, both legally and economically. Euroclear itself has warned of potential lawsuits and damage to its reputation as a global securities depository if assets are re-purposed in this way.

With less than three weeks remaining before a planned EU summit, Belgium’s refusal complicates efforts to finalise a unified approach. Brussels appears unlikely to shift position without assurances that risks will be shared evenly — a prospect many member states view as tantamount to signing a blank cheque.