News related to
crypto

Recently, the cryptocurrency trading platform BGEANX, known for its compliance, launched a high-performance matching engine that achieves millisecond-level trade execution, optimizing market liquidity and ensuring stable operation even under extreme market conditions. This technological advancement enhances user experience and positions BGEANX with core competitiveness in the fiercely competitive crypto market.

Due to high volatility in the crypto market, investors often face issues like long order placement times and increased slippage, leading to higher trading costs and missed opportunities. Leading exchanges are accelerating infrastructure development to optimize trade execution capabilities and improve liquidity. BGEANX launching the high-performance matching engine precisely responds to market demands, providing investors with a more stable market environment and optimal transaction prices.

In the competitive landscape of the industry, trading matching capability is one of the core competencies of exchanges. Through this technological update, BGEANX attracts professional traders and institutional users with faster order execution speed and stronger market depth. This upgrade ensures smoother execution of large trades, offering a more stable investment environment.

For different types of users, the technology upgrade brings tangible improvements in user experience. Ordinary users can enjoy faster order matching, avoiding missed trading opportunities due to matching delays. Professional traders and institutional investors focus more on low latency and high throughput, and the new generation matching engine of BGEANX ensures trading stability under extreme market conditions, providing reliable support for complex high-frequency quantitative strategies.

BGEANX spokesperson Seraphina stated: “BGEANX continues to invest in technological innovation, dedicated to providing users with excellent investment tools and a superior user experience. The launch of the millisecond matching engine marks another breakthrough in technology application for BGEANX. In the future, we will continue to optimize platform performance, combining AI trading tools and intelligent risk control systems to create a more intelligent crypto investment ecosystem for global investors.”

Hashtag: #BGEANX

The issuer is solely responsible for the content of this announcement.

• DAICS^® coin coverage: As of 3^rd December, the top 50 coins by average market capitalization across the past 90 days
• DAICS^® market capitalization coverage: 96.98%*
• The % coverage of market capitalization of the 50th ranked coin: 0.048%**
• Member changes within the Top 50 Coins in DAICS^®: eight coins added and nine coins deleted
• Additions: Zcash (ZEC), World Liberty Financial USD (WUSD), PayPalUSD (PYUSD), Memecore (M), Worldcoin (WLD), Story (IP), Arbitrum (ARB), KuCoin (KCS)
• Deletions: Mantra (OM), GateToken (GT), Official Trump (TRUMP), VeChain (VET), Render (RENDER), First Digital USD (FDUSD), Filecoin (FIL), Cosmos (ATOM), Algorand (ALGO)
• 9 Green Coins labelled: Cronos (CRO), Pi (PI), Internet Computer (ICP), Hedera, Sui (SUI), Toncoin (TON), Arbitrum (ARB), Mantle (MNT), Tron (TRX)

Note:
*Special currency treatment of DAICS^® applies, where any wrapped or second-level cryptocurrency is not considered in the calculation for the market capitalization of DAICS^®
**Based on 3rd December 2025
G: Green Coin

The rankings of additions and deletions for the DAICS^® top 50 cryptocurrencies are listed in Appendix 1. All classification changes, including the ixCrypto Infrastructure Index and ixCrypto Stablecoin index, will take effect on 23^rd January 2026, with market capitalization, rankings, and weightings available at www.ix-index.com.

1. Cryptocurrencies

1.1. Structure and Definitions

Tier 1: Industry Changes
The industry groups remain unchanged, with 5 industries and the respective weightings as follows:

Tier 2: Sector Changes
The number of sectors has increased from 17 to 18. There is one new sector added under the industry group “Tech & Data (140)”:

Identification (14040)
Definition: Cryptocurrencies that facilitate decentralized identity authentication and/or blockchain-based validation of digital intellectual property rights. The classification emphasizes trust, data consent, and privacy as core architectural features while the crypto by itself is not an identity token.

1.2. Reclassification Changes
This review doesn’t have any reclassification of the existing coins. The DAICS® 2H 2025 cryptocurrencies classification is available in Appendix 2.

1.3. Green Coin Label
This review identifies 9 Green Coins, classified based on their energy-per-unit-transaction, which is defined as the amount of energy consumed for a successful single unit transaction of the coin in the blockchain network. The coins selected rank in the top 20 percentile of the least energy-consuming cryptocurrencies out of the 50 DAICS^® constituents. The top 20 percentile’s threshold in this review is ≤ 0.150 Wh. The table below lists these low-energy coins.

Note: G as ‘Green Coin‘ labelling for cryptocurrencies that adhere to the principles of sustainability

2. Asset Backed Tokens (ABT)

2.1. Structure and Definitions

Tier 1: Asset Type Changes
The asset types remain unchanged at 6 as follows:
1) Culture (205),
2) Real Estate (215),
3) Financials (235),
4) Entertainment (255),
5) Natural Resources (265), and
6) Green Economy (275)

Tier 2: Branch Changes
The number of branches has increased from 31 to 32, with a new branch added under Financials (235): Tokenized funds (23540).

2.2. Classification Changes
This review doesn’t have any reclassification of the existing assets.

2.3. Coverage of DAICS^®
A classification summary and definition table of both cryptocurrencies and ABTs are available in Appendices 3 and 4. For further information regarding the methodology of the DAICS^®, please refer to the “IX Digital Asset Industry Classification System”- principle and guiding methodology on the company website https://ix-index.com/daics.html.

For more details on DAICS^® qualification criteria, please email daics@ixindex.com.

Appendix 1

G: Green Coin

Appendix 2

Note:
G as ‘Green Coin‘ for cryptocurrencies that adhere to the principles of sustainability
NEW for newly added sector

Appendix 3

Note: NEW for newly added sector

Appendix 4

Note: NEW for newly added branch

² United Nations 17 sustainable development goals covering 1) No Poverty 2) Zero Hunger 3) Good Health and Well-Being 4) Quality Education 5) Gender Equality 6) Clean Water and Sanitation 7) Affordable And Clean Energy 8) Decent Work and Economic Growth 9) Industry, Innovation and Infrastructure 10) Reduced inequalities 11) Sustainable Cities and Communities 12) Responsible Consumption and Production 13) Climate Action 14) Life Below Water 15) Life on Land 16) Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions and 17) Partnerships for the Goals https://sdgs.un.org/goals

The issuer is solely responsible for the content of this announcement.

About DAICS®

DAICS^® covers both cryptocurrencies and asset-backed tokens (“ABTs”), to be reviewed semi-annually at the end of June and December. On the cryptocurrency side, it is a three-tier system that groups cryptocurrencies into 5 main industries: 1) Payment, 2) Infrastructure, 3) Financial services, 4) Technology & Data, and 5) Media & Entertainment. These industries are further divided into sectors and sub-sectors to be introduced in the future. Under asset-backed tokens, there are 6 asset types: 1) Culture, 2) Real Estate, 3) Financials, 4) Entertainment, 5) Natural Resources, 6) Green Economy. These asset types are further divided into branches and sub-branches to be introduced in the future.

About the IX Asia Tokenization Advisory Committee and Working Group

The establishment of the IX Asia Tokenization Advisory Committee (“Advisory Committee”) is to pursue the goal and vision of formulating a standard for a global tokenization framework in a compliant and transparent way. The key role of the Advisory Committee is to formulate the guidelines and references for tokenization in terms of infrastructure, business, financial stability, sustainability, internal control, and classification. The Advisory Committee is comprised of industry-recognised leaders from blockchain consultancy, sustainable projects, and the field of the Art industry.

The establishment of the Working Group is to identify, evaluate and recommend key directions and founding principles according to their specific industry knowledge and expertise in relating to the creation of the specified token. It will examine and propose improvements to the guidelines and references for tokenization. The working group is formed of a diverse group of market experts representing relevant sectors and markets, to provide input and discuss case studies for creation of tokenization framework, best practices and development of real-world projects.

For more information about IX Asia Tokenization Advisory Committee & Working Group, please visit https://ix-index.com/tokenization-committee.html.

Growing concerns over the expansion of dollar-linked digital tokens have prompted the International Monetary Fund to issue a caution over the strain stablecoins could place on emerging markets, with the institution arguing that widespread use of these instruments risks weakening domestic monetary frameworks. The warning centres on the potential for currency substitution and accelerated outflows should stablecoins gain traction in jurisdictions where confidence in local units is fragile. This caution mirrors the broader message conveyed in IMF warns of stablecoin strain on emerging economies, underscoring the possibility of digital tokens amplifying financial vulnerabilities.

The Fund’s latest assessment highlights the challenge posed by USD-pegged tokens such as USDT and USDC, which together dominate the global stablecoin market. Analysts tracking flows note that these instruments have evolved into widely used vehicles for cross-border transfers, digital asset trading and store-of-value purposes in countries with volatile currencies. The IMF argues that their adoption can reduce the capacity of central banks to manage liquidity conditions, especially in economies where monetary authorities already contend with limited tools to stabilise inflation and anchor expectations. The institution has urged regulators to assume a proactive posture, particularly in markets where capital controls or shallow financial systems heighten the risk of abrupt movements.

The concerns reflect a shift from earlier phases of the digital asset cycle, when stablecoins attracted regulatory scrutiny largely due to their reserve backing and operational transparency. With greater clarity emerging around reserve audits and redemption mechanisms, policymakers are now looking beyond technical design and towards systemic implications. Economic experts cautioned that dollar-denominated tokens might evolve into parallel settlement channels, enabling households and corporates to bypass domestic banking systems during periods of stress. For countries with restricted foreign exchange markets, that pattern could complicate monetary management and accelerate the erosion of trust in local units.

Despite these warnings, several analysts point out that the scale of stablecoin adoption across developing economies remains uneven. Data from blockchain analytics firms suggests that while usage has grown in parts of Latin America, Africa, Eastern Europe and South Asia, activity is still far from the threshold that would trigger systemic currency substitution. Experts add that stablecoins often function as short-term hedging tools rather than long-term savings instruments, meaning their impact on monetary sovereignty is not yet of the magnitude implied by more pessimistic scenarios. Many economists argue that structural weaknesses in local economies, such as persistent inflation or fiscal imbalances, are more significant drivers of currency instability than the availability of digital dollar substitutes.

Regulators in several markets have already begun drafting frameworks to govern stablecoin issuance and use. Authorities in regions including the Gulf, the European Union, Singapore and parts of East Asia have introduced licensing requirements and reserve rules to ensure issuers maintain high-quality backing assets. These frameworks emphasise transparency and redemption at par, which policymakers view as essential to preventing destabilising runs. Some central banks are also exploring bilateral agreements to manage cross-border flows facilitated by stablecoins, particularly where local banks have limited capacity to monitor or report such transactions.

Several financial commentators suggest that concerns over capital flight through stablecoins stem from gaps in existing capital control regimes rather than from the forms of technology used to move funds. They argue that digital tokens merely enhance the speed and efficiency of transfers that might otherwise occur through informal channels. Nonetheless, the IMF stresses that the visibility and liquidity offered by stablecoins could encourage larger volumes to exit strained economies during periods of uncertainty. The institution asserts that emerging markets could face amplified volatility if households and corporates shift towards digital dollars at scale.

The rise of stablecoins has also coincided with broader experimentation in monetary innovation, with more than one hundred central banks evaluating options for digital currencies. Some economists view central bank digital currencies as a potential counterbalance to dollar-pegged private tokens, offering residents a regulated alternative for digital payments while preserving oversight. Others note that CBDCs alone will not offset the appeal of USD-linked tokens in countries where macroeconomic fundamentals drive demand for safer units. Policymakers face the challenge of building credibility, strengthening reserves and reinforcing inflation-targeting regimes while managing digital asset adoption.

While a number of market strategists acknowledge the IMF’s concerns, they contend that fears of widespread dominance of dollar-linked tokens may be overstated at the current stage of development. Adoption depends heavily on access to smartphones, internet connectivity, financial literacy and the availability of compliant service providers. These conditions vary widely across emerging economies, limiting the capacity of stablecoins to displace formal banking for now. Yet industry participants agree that the trajectory of digital finance warrants close oversight as stablecoin issuers expand their footprint and integration with payment networks.