News related to
crypto

Brazil has enacted sweeping tax reforms, imposing a 17.5% flat levy on all cryptocurrency capital gains from 12 June 2025 under Provisional Measure 1303. This marks a stark shift from the former progressive system with a monthly exemption, now replaced by a single rate that applies to any crypto profit—trade, swap, DeFi yield, NFT sale—even via offshore exchanges or self-custody wallets.

Casual traders previously exempted on gains up to R$35,000 per month will now face taxation. A modest R$30,000 profit previously carried a zero burden; today, the same yield triggers a R$5,250 tax under the uniform rate. Medium-scale investors face a slight rise from the previous 15%, while the wealthy—who once paid up to 22.5%—now benefit from reduced liability.

The reform extends the tax net to assets held outside Brazil or in private wallets: all gains, regardless of custody location, fall under the 17.5% rule. Gains from decentralised finance activities, staking rewards, NFT transactions and token swaps are subject to the same flat regime.

Capital gains must now be reported and paid quarterly. Taxpayers may carry forward losses for up to five prior quarters—a benefit that will be curtailed in 2026 under proposed legal adjustments.

The reform’s scope is broader than crypto. Fixed‑income investments previously exempt—such as LCIs, LCAs, CRIs and CRAs—will now face a 5% tax on earnings. Meanwhile, gross revenue from online betting will be taxed at 18%, rising from 12% this coming October.

Brazil’s decision mirrors its wider fiscal strategy. With the nation’s overall tax-to-GDP ratio peaking above 32% in 2024, the government seems intent on widening the tax base and closing enforcement gaps. By bringing offshore holdings and DeFi into scope, authorities signal enhanced oversight and a tightening grip on previously opaque financial flows.

Advocates highlight the new system’s simplicity. A flat rate streamlines compliance, eliminating thresholds and multiple brackets, potentially reducing disputes and administrative complexity. Critics argue it disproportionately affects small investors and gig‑economy earners, who lose prior exemptions with little recourse.

Financial institutions and crypto‑focused service providers are preparing advisory tools to assist taxpayers with new obligations. Tax‑tracking platforms, accounting software and professional guidance are expected to surge in demand as individuals and small enterprises strive for compliance.

Looking ahead, the government plans to reduce the loss carry‑forward period in 2026 and explore pilot schemes to permit up to 50% of salaries to be paid in cryptocurrencies, particularly for remote work and contractors. Some fintech firms are already eyeing the change, examining crypto payroll and treasury integration.

Investors and citizen‑taxpayers must now track all crypto movements—onshore and offshore, centralised or decentralised. Each taxable event requires precise record‑keeping of acquisition cost, sale value, platform or exchange used, and timing. Errors or omissions could trigger penalties, including fines and interest charges.

Brazil’s audit agency intends to intensify scrutiny using on‑chain analytics, cross‑referencing declarations with blockchain records. Collaboration with international tax authorities may further bolster enforcement capacity.

The flat 17.5% tax places Brazil in a middling position globally—higher than zero‑tax jurisdictions like the UAE and Switzerland, but considerably lower than India’s 30% flat or Japan’s top marginal rates exceeding 50%.

JD. com and Ant Group have formally submitted proposals to the People’s Bank of China seeking approval for yuan-pegged stablecoin issuance, marking a key step in Beijing’s efforts to internationalise its currency. Ant Group is also preparing licence applications in Hong Kong and Singapore to deploy offshore renminbi stablecoins beyond mainland China.

The push comes after the Hong Kong legislature enacted a stablecoin licensing framework on 21 May 2025, with regulations taking effect from August. Under the new rules, issuers of Hong Kong dollar–referenced digital tokens must secure authorisation from the Hong Kong Monetary Authority. JD. com has suggested beginning issuance in Hong Kong before piloting operations in Chinese free-trade zones—a phased approach that has been met with encouraging feedback from regulators.

The strategic backdrop for this development includes a decline in the yuan’s share of global payments to 2.89% in May—the lowest in nearly two years—while dollar-pegged stablecoins control approximately 99% of the market. Former Bank of China deputy head Wang Yongli cautioned that unless yuan-based solutions gain traction, China could risk lagging behind if cross-border payments remain less efficient than dollar-denominated cryptocurrency options.

Ant Group’s global strategy is already in motion. Ant International aims to apply for licences under the new Hong Kong regime from 1 August, and then proceed to Singapore and Luxembourg. Meanwhile, JD. com intends to seek approvals in multiple major currency jurisdictions, citing ambitions to reduce cross-border settlement costs by up to 90% and speed up transaction times to under 10 seconds.

Hong Kong’s stablecoin ordinance emphasizes reserve management, redemptions and robust risk controls, operating on the principle of “same activity, same risks, same regulation”. The region’s new LEAP framework is designed to nurture asset tokenisation and stablecoin issuance, compelling global players to participate.

Remaining constraints on audience trust and onshore–offshore integration persist. China’s strict capital controls may hinder scalable adoption of offshore yuan stablecoins, and questions remain over transparency in reserve backing, redemption mechanisms, and potential surveillance—echoing critiques levelled against e‑CNY, China’s domestic central bank digital currency.

Nonetheless, analysts argue that successfully launching an offshore yuan stablecoin could enhance digital renminbi’s global footprint without conflicting with mainland crypto restrictions. It would offer exporters an alternative to dollar-linked tokens and deepen the yuan’s digital payment infrastructure.

President Trump’s support for dollar-pegged stablecoin regulation in the United States has accelerated momentum overseas. China’s tech giants appear intent on ensuring the yuan remains a competitive currency in the next-generation digital economy.

Key stakeholders, including Morgan Stanley and Crypto HK, suggest that Hong Kong could function as a vital testbed, providing a bridge between mainland policy and the global crypto market.

With licence windows opening this August and multi-jurisdictional applications in progress, the ball is now in the court of global financial regulators. Approval of these proposals could mark a significant shift in digital finance, elevating the yuan’s status in the evolving ecosystem of global trade and finance.

Court filings in the Chapter 11 case for collapsed exchange FTX suggest that users in 49 jurisdictions may see their claims disputed or denied over local crypto restrictions. A filing submitted on 2 July to the Delaware bankruptcy court outlines a new “hold‑and‑review” process, halting distributions to users in areas with bans on crypto trading or restrictions on offshore platforms.

FTX’s trustee, along with legal counsel, will evaluate whether paying out creditors in these jurisdictions violates local laws. Notices will then be issued to affected users, granting them at least 45 days to challenge their classification. Absent a timely response, claims and any accrued interest will be forfeited to the estate.

Although users in these 49 jurisdictions represent just 5% of approved claims, the financial exposure is heavily weighted. Over 82% of that total value originates from mainland China. China accounts for the vast majority of claims in what FTX labels “potentially restricted jurisdictions”. Advocates warn that most Chinese claimants may not recover any funds.

FTX’s court motion says it will seek legal opinions for each jurisdiction before approving any payout. If counsel concludes local law prohibits the disbursement, those claims will be formally challenged. The legal framework treats such claims as “disputed,” pending approval or denial of their status. Distributions will be suspended until those claims are resolved.

Affected users must submit sworn statements confirming acceptance of US court jurisdiction to pursue objections. Upon objection, the trustee will petition the court to determine if exclusion is justified. Lack of objection will result in automatic forfeiture.

The list of 49 jurisdictions includes not only China, but also countries such as Nigeria, Russia, Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Andorra, Fiji and Zimbabwe. That breadth reflects the wide global footprint of FTX prior to its collapse.

Chinese users have responded with alarm, exploring legal avenues in the US. One affected claimant, identified as “Will,” told media that though the crypto ban in mainland China prevents trading, holdings remain legal and ownership rights should entitle them to fiat reimbursement in US dollars. He has engaged a New York attorney to counter FTX’s position on wire transfers and jurisdictional exclusion.

Some creditors are studying whether to transfer or sell their claims through entities in compliant jurisdictions, though it remains unclear whether such mechanisms will resolve legal barriers.

FTX Recovery Trust reported an overall decline in disputed claims—from US $6.5 billion to US $4.6 billion—after approving $1.8 billion in claims and expecting another $2.7 billion to be cleared. Approved claim distributions have reached approximately $8.3 billion. This new policy specifically targets the subset linked to restricted jurs, leaving billions in limbo.

Legal experts suggest the court’s decision could set precedent for how bankruptcy courts manage cross‑border crypto claims when local compliance is at risk. FTX is therefore seeking judicial approval to formalise this tailored procedure.

Critics argue the move undermines proportional equity. Victims from major markets like China, Nigeria and Egypt, who collectively hold substantial unrationalised stakes, now face potential complete exclusion. These developments raise concerns about transparency and fairness in the global recovery process.

FTX’s reorganisation plan approved in October 2024 allows repayment of up to US $16.5 billion to customers. It prioritises accounts holding US $50,000 or less under the terms of the Chapter 11 order, but regional legal hurdles may override the general scheme.

Trustee Sunil Kavuri summarised that each claim will proceed only with a supportive local legal opinion. If the opinion concludes a payout contravenes domestic laws, the claim will be formally disputed and may be permanently disallowed.

The U. S. House of Representatives will convene “Crypto Week” from 14–18 July to vote on three pivotal digital asset bills: the CLARITY Act, the Anti‑CBDC Surveillance State Act, and the GENIUS Act. This coordinated effort signals a major shift in federal crypto policy as lawmakers aim to clarify regulation, protect financial privacy, and foster blockchain innovation.

The CLARITY Act seeks to establish a definitive regulatory framework by delineating the roles of the SEC and CFTC, mandating the segregation of customer funds, and requiring enhanced retail disclosures. It has already passed through both the Financial Services and Agriculture Committees by decisive margins, reflecting bipartisan support and responding directly to industry demands for legal certainty.

The GENIUS Act, recently approved by the Senate in a strong 68–30 bipartisan vote, focuses on stablecoin regulation. It mandates that stablecoin reserves be held in high‑quality, liquid assets such as U. S. Treasuries, requires annual audits for issuers with over $50 billion in market cap, and clarifies regulatory oversight while allowing banks to issue their own tokens. The bill now awaits a House vote, with hopes of reaching the president’s desk by late July.

The Anti‑CBDC Surveillance State Act takes a definitive stance against a federally issued central bank digital currency, effectively prohibiting the Federal Reserve from developing or distributing a CBDC. Proponents frame it as a necessary measure to safeguard financial privacy and prevent potential government surveillance through digital currency systems.

Deputy Speaker Mike Johnson and committee chairs, including Financial Services Chair French Hill and Agriculture Chair GT Thompson, have emphasised that this legislative package aligns with former President Trump’s digital assets agenda — aiming to position the U. S. as a leader in crypto innovation. Johnson stated that the bills would deliver the full scope of that agenda, while Hill highlighted that the initiative would finally provide clarity for innovators, protecting both consumers and the broader digital economy.

Majority Leader Steve Scalise echoed the sentiment, saying the legislation would solidify the U. S.’s global leadership in digital assets. Minority voices have also weighed in: Majority Whip Tom Emmer described the moment as a “historic opportunity” to uphold “privacy, individual sovereignty, and free‑market competitiveness.” Senator Bill Hagerty voiced Senate support, noting the urgency of enacting these measures swiftly.

While the GENIUS Act has Senate backing, the CLARITY Act has faced scrutiny from Democrats and former regulators. Experts such as ex‑CFTC Chair Timothy Massad have warned that its provisions could be overly broad or convoluted, advocating instead for a collaborative regulatory approach between the SEC and CFTC. Concerns also persist among left‑leaning lawmakers that pairing the CLARITY Act with stablecoin regulation could stall progress, despite strong crypto industry support calling for their passage in tandem.

Lawmakers like Rep. Warren Davidson have promoted consolidating stablecoin, market‑structure, and CBDC ban measures into a single legislative package to ensure comprehensive reform. However, this strategy may encounter resistance in the Senate, potentially delaying the bills past the intended timeline.

The Senate’s passage of the GENIUS Act earlier this month reflected growing bipartisan agreement on stablecoin oversight but also revealed tensions over inclusion of Trump‑era cryptocurrency interests. Indeed, some critics have raised ethical questions about exempting the president’s family from the bill’s prohibitions on member profits, and the influence of Trump‑linked ventures that reportedly earned tens of millions from crypto operations.

Despite these controversies, House Republicans are pushing ahead with “Crypto Week” as a gateway to shaping U. S. cryptocurrency policy. The CLARITY Act furthers efforts made under the FIT21 digital asset law passed in May 2024, which established initial delineation of regulatory authority.

As 14 July approaches, industry stakeholders, advocacy groups, and congressional offices are bracing for intense debates. Passing these bills could redefine market structures, unlock stablecoin innovation, and reinforce constitutional privacy rights—or it may start a protracted legislative battle over oversight, accountability, and the future role of federal oversight in digital currencies.

The Open Platform, the team behind the Telegram Wallet on TON, has secured $28.5 million in a Series A round led by Ribbit Capital, propelling the company to a $1 billion valuation. The fundraising, achieved through the sale of 5% equity in traditional currency terms, positions TOP to expand its operations into the U. S. and European markets and to roll out blockchain-based games and AI-driven applications.

TOP serves as the core developer for Telegram’s official blockchain, The Open Network, and is responsible for creating and maintaining the Telegram Wallet, which facilitates peer-to-peer transfers within chats. The company will channel its new funds into market expansion and product development, aligning with its long-held strategy of leveraging Telegram’s user base—now over a billion monthly active users—to advance the blockchain ecosystem.

Ribbit Capital led the round, acquiring approximately 4–5% of TOP’s equity. Other notable participants included Pantera Capital, reinforcing investor confidence in TON’s growth potential. The funding arrived without any sale of cryptocurrency tokens, emphasising that the stake was purely equity-based.

Since Telegram integrated TON in 2022, the ecosystem has witnessed rapid uptake. Metrics show active TON accounts rising from roughly 4 million to over 41 million, with more than 121 million unique Toncoin holders. Daily on-chain transactions surged from approximately 100,000 to 1.2 million, while total value locked has exceeded US $350 million. These figures underscore user engagement and the ecosystem’s expanding financial activity.

TOP’s forthcoming initiatives include incubating blockchain-native games—both multiplayer and mini-app formats—that operate entirely on the TON chain. They will use Telegram’s Mini‑App infrastructure, which is already adopted by over half a billion users. One such example is the viral “Hamster Kombat” game, which has drawn over 300 million players and helped introduce mainstream audiences to blockchain functionality.

AI-driven applications are another priority. TOP is developing tools and platforms that integrate machine learning models directly into TON-based environments, enabling chat-integrated utilities—such as fraud detection, financial analytics, and smart assistants—without departing the Telegram interface.

Regulatory headwinds in the U. S. and Europe will present challenges. The SEC previously halted Telegram’s launch of its native token, Gram, in 2020, leading to a refund and legal settlement. Now guided by Maximilian Crown—TON Foundation’s newly appointed CEO with regulatory and compliance experience—TOP aims to navigate these complex legal environments. Crown’s background at MoonPay, where he oversaw U. S. and European licensing, equips the project with added expertise as it seeks entry into compliant markets.

Support from both traditional and crypto-focused investors reflects strong market confidence. Alongside Ribbit and Pantera, unicorn‐backed VCs such as Sequoia, Benchmark, and Kingsway have previously invested over $400 million in Toncoin, affirming institutional belief in TON’s role as Telegram’s blockchain layer.

TOP’s strategy reflects a broader shift within Web3—pursuing real-world use cases embedded into existing digital platforms. Using Telegram’s 1 billion+ user base, BOTs, wallets, mini-apps, and secure messaging infrastructure, TOP aims to drive mass crypto adoption while sidestepping consumer-level friction.

Analysts note that TOP’s equity‑only raise is distinctive; contrast it with token sales that often involve community risk. By focusing on equity, TOP offers investors upside across its product stack—including wallets, DeFi tools, games, and AI utilities—without diluting with token allocation.

Upcoming milestones include launching its U. S. and European operations before year‑end, unveiling its first wave of blockchain‑native games, and beta‑testing AI‑enhanced wallets and utility apps. With a valuation of $1 billion and deepening partnerships, TOP is well positioned to define Telegram’s blockchain strategy beyond financial services into entertainment and artificial intelligence.

The Securities and Exchange Commission has placed a hold on Grayscale’s bid to convert its Digital Large Cap Fund into a spot exchange‑traded fund, pending review by the full Commission. The stoppage comes despite staff-level approval and a delegated‑authority green light issued on 1 July for the fund’s listing on NYSE Arca.

With around $755 million in assets, GDLC is heavily weighted towards Bitcoin, with additional holdings in Ethereum, Solana, Ripple, and Cardano. The proposed spot ETF would have been the first U.S. regulated multi‑crypto fund, broadening exposure beyond single‑asset offerings approved earlier.

The SEC’s Acting Division of Trading and Markets approved the listing via delegated authority under Rule 19b‑4. However, under Rule 431, any commissioner can request review—and at least one did on 2 July, triggering an automatic stay of the approval. The Commission has not stated which member requested the review nor provided a timeline for resolving it.

Market analysts suggest the pause may reflect the SEC’s intent to finalise a regulatory framework for spot crypto ETFs—especially products holding assets under unresolved legal status like Solana, XRP, and Cardano—prior to the launch of diversified digital‑asset vehicles. Bloomberg ETF specialist James Seyffart opined that the Commission may be preparing formal listing standards under the 19b‑4 rule before further layered launches.

Grayscale has been converting several trusts into ETFs to close price inefficiencies and align fund prices with net asset value. GDLC tracks CoinDesk’s CoinDesk 5 Index and was trading over-the-counter since 2019. The product had been expected to bring greater liquidity and lower premiums typical of Grayscale trusts.

Financial observers warn that the hold introduces uncertainty for Grayscale, NYSE Arca and other issuers—including Bitwise and Franklin Templeton—who have filed for multi‑asset crypto ETFs and await regulatory clarity. The SEC’s prior approvals for Bitcoin and Ethereum‑only spot ETFs in January and July 2024, respectively, signal cautious acceptance for those assets—but the inclusion of altcoins poses new legal and risk considerations.

Key regulatory questions remain unresolved: the treatment of tokens with ongoing litigation, safeguards against market manipulation, valuation transparency, and asset custody protocols. Rule 431 empowers commissioners to review staff‑level delegations and, once invoked, mandates a suspension of the approval—until the Commission issues a resolution.

BlackRock’s iShares Bitcoin Trust has overtaken its flagship S&P 500 ETF, IVV, in annual fee revenue, marking a significant shift in investor interest. IBIT now generates approximately $187.2 million a year, edging ahead of IVV’s $187.1 million—remarkable given IBIT’s substantially smaller asset base and higher fees.

Since launching in January 2024, IBIT has attracted roughly $52 billion in net inflows—nearly 96% of all capital entering U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs—and now accounts for more than 55% of the category’s assets. Its success has propelled assets under management to around $72–75 billion, with the fund achieving the fastest-ever climb to $70 billion in just 341 trading days.

The rapid accumulation reflects shifting institutional sentiment. Analysts note that investors are increasingly willing to pay premium fees—IBIT charges 0.25% versus IVV’s mere 0.03%—for access to Bitcoin exposure within trusted regulated vehicles. Nate Geraci, president of the ETF Store, said the milestone “reflects both surging investor demand for Bitcoin and significant fee compression in core equity exposure”.

While fee revenue for IBIT now tops IVV, critics caution that underlying volatility in Bitcoin has diminished, bringing it closer to traditional equity benchmarks. ETF analyst Eric Balchunas noted that IBIT’s volatility—once over five times that of equities—has softened significantly, attributing this partly to institutional scale and maturing market dynamics.

IBIT is also directing the vast majority of new capital entering spot Bitcoin ETFs. Over the past 15 trading days, U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs have drawn nearly $5 billion in inflows; IBIT alone captured more than 80% of this flow, including $112 million on the final trading day of June. Its individual inflow streak totalled $3.8 billion before plateauing.

Despite its dominance, IBIT has not been immune to market fluctuations. Bitcoin-related ETFs experienced a $342 million outflow in a single day, ending a 15-day positive run. That pause included IBIT seeing no inflows that day, although analysts like Valentin Fournier at BRN Lead Research cautioned it may reflect a temporary cooldown rather than a shift in sentiment.

BlackRock’s success with IBIT is emblematic of broader trends identified by financial research. According to S&P Global, appetite for digitally‑focused funds remains robust, particularly where institutional frameworks offer clarity and accessibility. The Financial Times highlighted that active ETFs—especially crypto and options‑focused products—are capturing disproportionate fee income relative to passive counterparts, driven by higher demand and pricing flexibility.

Regulatory stability since January 2024 has facilitated IBIT’s ascent, making it easier for large-scale investors to allocate to cryptocurrency via mainstream platforms. This institutional flow has, in turn, helped reduce price volatility in Bitcoin itself, narrowing the gap with traditional ETFs.

Yet questions persist about longevity. IBIT’s future depends on sustaining investor interest amid macroeconomic shifts and evolving competition. Emerging Bitcoin ETFs from competitors like Fidelity’s FBTC and Ark Invest’s ARKB are gaining attention, though they trail IBIT significantly. Institutional scrutiny also remains vigilant, focused on fund liquidity, asset custody, and regulatory compliance.

BlackRock is expanding its digital asset strategy beyond the U.S., with plans to introduce a bitcoin ETF in Europe, potentially domiciled in Switzerland, contingent on MiCA framework compliance.

BlackRock’s benchmark S&P 500 ETF, IVV, retains its massive $600+ billion in assets. Though still the industry cornerstone, its fee income has been outstripped for the first time—by a product founded on the dynamic, historically volatile Bitcoin market. The shift underscores a pivotal moment in ETF evolution, as Bitcoin transitions from niche digital asset to mainstream portfolio inclusion.

Bit Digital has raised a total of $162.9 million through an underwritten public share offering, signalling its strategic pivot from Bitcoin mining into building a substantial Ethereum treasury. Underwriters fully exercised their over‑allotment option on 1 July 2025, expanding the issuance to 86.25 million ordinary shares and boosting net proceeds to the disclosed sum.

The capital infusion positions the Nasdaq‑listed miner to sharply reduce its focus on Bitcoin operations and allocate the funds towards acquiring Ethereum—a shift that aligns with broader trends among institutional investors favouring Ether. The company already manages 24,434 ETH, valued at approximately $59.8 million, and plans to convert around 417.6 BTC—worth roughly $44.9 million—into ETH, further bolstering its holdings.

Bit Digital’s decision emerges at a pivotal moment for Ethereum, which continues to draw momentum from its network upgrades and growing appeal in decentralised finance and staking arenas. Industry analysts interpret this move as institutional endorsement of Ethereum’s utility and long‑term integrity.

The offering was executed under a shelf registration declared effective on 20 June 2025, with B. Riley Securities acting as sole bookrunner and Clear Street, Craig‑Hallum, and Northland Capital Markets serving as co‑managers.

This marked exit from Bitcoin mining investments reflects a growing recognition of proof‑of‑stake ecosystems, such as Ethereum’s, as lower‑carbon and increasingly profitable ventures relative to energy‑intensive Bitcoin operations. Bit Digital’s move mirrors strategic shifts by other firms seeking to diversify within the crypto landscape.

By converting a significant portion of its Bitcoin holdings into Ethereum, the company is betting on the upside potential of ETH staking rewards. Ethereum’s transition to proof‑of‑stake has positioned it as a credible alternative revenue stream for firms with digital asset treasuries, moving beyond merely holding and mining cryptocurrencies.

The structural implications for investors are multifaceted. While diluting existing shareholders through the share issuance, the company now holds a stronger, more liquid position in Ethereum. Analysts suggest that institutional confidence in Ether is rising, as evidenced by the flurry of allocations into ETH‑focused treasuries, staking projects, and exchange‑traded funds.

Investor reactions have been mixed. Some view the dilution as manageable given the scale of capital and the clear strategic direction. Others question how successfully Bit Digital will deploy its ETH assets, including whether it will stake holdings and manage risk across its newly acquired portfolio.

Industry observers emphasise that successful execution will require transparent operation of staking protocols, disciplined treasury management, and risk mitigation strategies to protect against Ether’s price volatility. Questions also remain over how quickly the BTC-to-ETH conversion will be completed and whether the Ethereum market can absorb such large inflows without destabilising prices.

Bit Digital’s acquisition comes on the heels of growing institutional inflows into Ethereum, including predictions of multi‑billion dollar inflows into ETH‑based ETFs in 2025, suggesting a wave of mainstream financial participation.

The European Central Bank has green‑lit a pioneering dual‑track framework to enable settlement of transactions on distributed ledger technology platforms using central bank money. The Governing Council’s initiative combines a short‑term pilot, dubbed Pontes, scheduled to interface DLT platforms with TARGET Services by the end of the third quarter of 2026, and a longer‑term initiative, Appia, which seeks to establish a future‑proof global DLT infrastructure.

Pontes represents the near‑term goal: creating a secure link between existing DLT platforms and the Eurosystem’s TARGET services—namely TARGET2, T2S and TIPS—through a unified Eurosystem solution. It builds directly on exploratory work carried out between May and November 2024, where 64 participants explored over 50 experimental setups that used intraday escrow and liquidity tokens. The ECB has indicated its intention to invite expressions of interest from the market to join Pontes’ pilot phase, expected to commence by Q3 2026.

The longer‑term Appia track explores integration of DLT in a broader ecosystem, extending into global payment and securities infrastructures. This initiative aims to support international use cases such as cross‑border foreign exchange settlements and compliance with global standards, collaborating with public and private sector stakeholders to assess interoperability, scalability and legal frameworks.

During the 2024 discovery phase, experiments featured diverse approaches, including trials led by the Banque de France and Banca d’Italia. These trials used escrow-based intraday liquidity provision mechanisms that participants later advocated to evolve into overnight capabilities, shedding light on liquidity management inefficiencies. Officials noted the potential for simultaneous settlement and collateral automation to cut credit and liquidity risks, while potentially reducing operational costs.

Piero Cipollone, a member of the ECB’s Executive Board, remarked that although DLT and tokenisation remain nascent, they “are likely to offer new ways of improving the settlement of financial transactions.” He emphasised that the dual‑track approach serves innovation while maintaining security and efficiency in financial market infrastructure.

Pontes and Appia will operate under dedicated market contact groups. The ECB intends to outfit each with analysts and market participants to ensure operational robustness and collect stakeholder feedback as integration proceeds. With Pontes launching a Q3 2026 pilot, the ECB is concurrently reviewing additional trial proposals for integration within existing TARGET services frameworks.

The initiatives support the Eurosystem’s wider ambition to modernise wholesale settlement systems. Appia is envisioned as an evolution towards integrated ecosystems that support global operations and stimulate interoperability with other jurisdictions, thereby elevating Europe’s position in the digital infrastructure space.

European authorities have signalled enduring commitment to innovation since experimental work in 2024. The report released today, aligned with Pontes and Appia’s dual‑track launch, highlights how central banks across the continent are balancing emerging technologies with systemic resilience goals—managing legal, technical and liquidity implications harmoniously.

Market analysts believe the Pontes initiative addresses immediate demand from DLT innovators for central bank money settlement in familiar frameworks, while Appia opens the door to more ambitious, globally interoperable DLT ecosystems. Senior banking figures in Frankfurt have described the move as a “critical turning point” in central banks embracing digital transformation to reduce transaction costs and boost cross-border efficiency across Europe.

The ECB’s decision signals readiness to bridge traditional financial infrastructure with blockchain-based innovations without compromising safety or oversight. Through Pontes, the Eurosystem seeks to preserve market standards for liquidity and settlement, building confidence among banks and fintechs in central bank money λ integration. Appia, in turn, presents a vision of digital finance aligned with evolving global regulation and technological standards.

This marks the first time the ECB has approved a formal pilot to connect central bank money with DLT platforms. The outcomes of Pontes will help shape future integrations—potentially serving as a template for central bank digital currencies and wholesale tokenised ecosystems. The experiments under Appia could establish key precedents for global interoperability standards and regulatory coordination, reinforcing the Eurosystem’s role as a leader in secure, innovative payment infrastructures.

PoliCloud has closed a €7.5 million seed funding round led by Global Ventures, with participation from MI8, OneRagtime, Inria and others, to accelerate its expansion of sovereign, decentralised cloud infrastructure aimed at European governments, enterprises and SMEs.

The Cannes‑based firm will deploy the capital to bolster its operational team, scale micro‑data centre deployment across Europe and target public sector clients that need secure, locally governed cloud services.

Founded in February 2025 by serial fintech entrepreneur David Gurlé, PoliCloud delivers containerised micro‑data centres housing proprietary hardware integrated with Hivenet’s distributed storage and computing software. Early traction includes four sold units and projected revenues in excess of €6 million by the end of 2025.

The firm’s micro‑data centres—equipped with up to 104 GPUs per unit and expected to scale beyond 1,000 GPUs by year‑end—are designed for high‑performance computing, AI processing and encrypted data storage, offering reduced dependency on US‑based cloud giants and enhanced compliance with European data sovereignty standards.

“PoliCloud is meeting a critical market demand for sovereign cloud infrastructure that is not only secure and abundant but also eco‑responsible,” Gurlé stated, underscoring an ambition to deliver affordable, decentralised compute infrastructure across the continent.

Global Ventures Senior Partner Simon Sharp explained the investment thesis, emphasising a need for visionary entrepreneurs offering solutions with clear market demand and global potential. The firm previously backed Hivenet in 2022 and views PoliCloud as a strategic addition to its portfolio.

OneRagtime CEO Stéphanie Hospital and Mi8 Managing Director Guillaume Dhamelincourt echoed the sentiment, citing the increasing demand for affordable, secure and sustainable computing power in Europe. Inria’s participation aligned with its strategic mission to support decentralised computing as a way to bolster France’s digital autonomy.

Industry analysts note that the cloud infrastructure sector in Europe has drawn significant venture investment, particularly in sovereign and AI-ready platforms. PoliCloud stands out for combining hardware innovation, distributed software architecture and environmental responsibility—promising 75% lower CO₂ emissions and zero‑water waste per unit.

PoliCloud’s edge compute strategy is being viewed as a potential game‑changer in the context of accelerating AI adoption. It offers municipalities, research institutions and regulated industries the flexibility to deploy GPU‑rich, GDPR‑compliant infrastructure locally, rather than relying on centralised hyperscalers.

Operating from Cannes, the company has so far sold four units within three months of its February launch at the World AI Cannes Festival. Hardware specifics remain under wraps, though insiders suggest each container may host more than 100 GPUs, with a roadmap targeting up to 10,000 GPUs by the end of 2026.

The €7.5 million lifeline will be used to recruit additional talent, fund technical development, scale production of micro‑data centres and initiate roll‑out across multiple European markets.

The Securities and Exchange Commission is developing a standardised framework that would allow token-based exchange-traded funds to list directly on exchanges, without requiring individual Rule 19b‑4 filings. The initiative, still in early stages, would set eligibility criteria—such as specific thresholds for market capitalisation, trading volume and liquidity—to determine which tokens qualify for streamlined launches.

This approach echoes previous SEC moves: in 2016, actively managed ETFs gained generic listing access under Rule 19b‑4, bypassing lengthy approval processes. Exchanges such as NYSE, Nasdaq and Cboe laid the groundwork by integrating uniform listing standards for index-based and active ETFs, paving the way for this token-focused evolution.

In May, Nasdaq formally proposed Rule 5703 to facilitate generic listing of multi-class ETFs, provided they align with Rule 6c‑11 and relevant exemption orders—allowing shares to debut without SEC review per fund. Similarly, Cboe sought generic listing permission for commodity-based ETFs to enable immediate options trading once criteria are met. The current SEC effort extends that logic to the burgeoning field of digital asset tokens.

Nasdaq has suggested the SEC adopt consistent standards for spot crypto ETPs under the 1933 Act, arguing that futures-based equivalents have already benefited from generic listing systems. This dovetails with mounting interest in regulated spot token funds, evidenced by amendments to listings such as Solana ETFs by issuers including 21Shares and Bitwise.

Under the envisaged standard, exchanges would apply objective, measurable thresholds—minimum market cap, daily volume and liquidity—to lists of token ETPs. Meeting these thresholds would allow issuers to bypass the full Rule 19b‑4 paperwork and associated months-long wait. Exchanges would retain responsibility for ongoing surveillance, as required by Section 19b‑4, ensuring investor protection and market integrity.

Stakeholders believe the move could vastly reduce time-to-market and cut legal and administrative costs. Industry analysts have highlighted that current Rule 19b‑4 reviews often delay ETF launches by months, even years. Exchanges argue that objectively defined generic standards provide predictability and efficiency—benefits that appear essential in digital asset markets known for rapid innovation.

Critics caution, however, that token assets may present unique compliance and market-risk considerations. Spot crypto markets, for instance, remain vulnerable to manipulation, price fragmentation and regulatory uncertainty. Ensuring adequate surveillance and governance, they warn, is material to the standard’s success.

To address this, exchanges plan to build in monitoring mechanisms, adaptation of surveillance regimes, and safeguards to delist or suspend tokens that fail to maintain standards. Similar models have been applied to options on commodity ETFs and multi-class ETF shares, suggesting a tested regulatory infrastructure.

The SEC’s token-ETF framework is likely to include consultation with market participants and exchanges, incorporating feedback from recent proposals such as Nasdaq’s push for spot crypto ETP generic listing. Legal advisors emphasise the importance of clear, data-driven criteria to withstand Rule 19b‑4’s statutory requirement for investor protection.

Key players expected to benefit include token issuers, established asset managers entering crypto, and intermediaries seeking to offer exchange-traded token exposure. Streamlined listing could also encourage institutional investors to enter the token market with confidence, potentially increasing adoption and liquidity.

Within the regulatory community, observers note that the SEC is mindful of its 2024 approval of spot Ether ETFs via individual 19b‑4 forms; a broader listing standard could expand this success to a wider array of digital assets. Meanwhile, pending amendments relating to token staking in ETFs—such as those Cboe filed in March—underscore the growing diversity within crypto-linked products.

As deliberations progress, industry and legal experts are analysing possible criteria thresholds, surveillance protocols, and whether the framework will initially apply only to spot token ETPs or extend to futures and hybrid products. Exchanges appear to favour a phased approach, beginning with established tokens that already meet basic listing requirements.

Naver Pay is spearheading an initiative to introduce a South Korean won–pegged stablecoin, with Dunamu—the operator behind Upbit—providing technical and operational support, launching a bold push into blockchain-based payments.

The payment platform officially disclosed its intent to enter the won stablecoin space on 26 June. Today, Dunamu confirmed its support for the project, emphasising that Naver Pay will lead, while Dunamu ensures robust backend assistance. Detailed structures and issuance responsibilities remain under review pending regulatory approval.

Stablecoins, digital tokens pegged 1:1 to the Korean won, promise minimal price volatility. Such stability makes them suited for everyday transactions and value storage. Naver Pay aims to cultivate an ecosystem that includes a consortium of financial institutions, tech partners, and regulatory consultation to ensure comprehensive infrastructure, covering issuance, redemption, reserves, wallet services, custody, and integration with existing payment rails.

This partnership coincides with broader momentum in the stablecoin arena. Eight major South Korean banks are collaborating through a joint venture to issue their own won-pegged token, targeting a launch by late 2025 or early 2026, contingent on regulatory clarity. Simultaneously, the Financial Supervisory Service supports these initiatives, signalling growing institutional endorsement.

On the legislative front, the National Assembly is considering the Framework Act on Digital Assets, which outlines provisions specific to KRW stablecoins. This follows advocacy within the Democratic Party for formal recognition of stablecoins as legitimate mediums of payment, underscoring their strategic importance in national finance.

Regulators like the Bank of Korea maintain a cautious stance toward non-bank stablecoin issuers, particularly fintech firms, reflecting concerns over financial stability and reserve transparency. At present, the central bank continues to advance its own CBDC project, but no formal decision has been made to integrate these private-sector stablecoins into national payment systems.

Naver Pay’s scale positions the platform as a potential game‑changer. With access to Naver’s vast user base—spanning search, e‑commerce, messaging, webtoons and fintech—the stablecoin could gain rapid consumer acceptance. Meanwhile, Dunamu brings its deep expertise in digital asset technology and compliance, as evidenced by Upbit’s leading position in South Korea’s exchange market.

International regulators are also focusing on stablecoin frameworks. In the US, the Senate passed the Genius Act on 17 June, indicating growing legislative momentum. Against this backdrop, South Korea’s regulators are keen to streamline stablecoin governance, striking a balance between innovation and consumer protection.

Deutsche Bank is set to roll out a digital assets custody service in 2026, joining forces with Bitpanda Technology Solutions and deepening its existing alliance with Swiss fintech Taurus SA.

Aimed at institutional and corporate clients, the bank’s custody offering is built on two pillars: custody and tokenisation capabilities powered by Taurus SA, and the digital infrastructure from Bitpanda’s technology arm. Taurus has been the backbone of Deutsche Bank’s digital asset efforts since 2023, and the integration with Bitpanda is expected to significantly expand operational capacity.

Inside sources familiar with the initiative confirm that launch preparations are already underway, with a projected go-live in early 2026. The move reflects Deutsche Bank’s view that tokenised assets could become a fundamental component of the financial ecosystem, aligning with growing projections that this market could reach hundreds of billions by the end of the decade.

Taurus SA—positioned as a leader in digital asset infrastructure—provides enterprise-grade cold, warm and hot custody solutions, along with tokenisation services that Deutsche Bank will leverage. As noted by Taurus co‑founder Lamine Brahimi in 2023, the match between the Swiss firm’s infrastructure and Deutsche Bank’s scale was a critical factor in formalising their initial partnership.

Meanwhile, Bitpanda’s technology unit will contribute real‑time, scalable digital asset operations. The Vienna‑based firm, which supports more than 4 million users across Europe, already offers regulated trading and custody services for cryptocurrencies, stocks, ETFs and commodities. Deutsche Bank’s adoption of Bitpanda’s tech could enable graduated access to a broader swathe of tokenised assets for its clients.

The partnership builds on Deutsche Bank’s cautious but steady progression into the digital asset landscape. Already serving as the banking partner for Bitpanda’s German IBAN services—and integrating Bitpanda’s platform for retail payments—Deutsche Bank has maintained a conservative stance, ensuring compliance and risk protocols are robust. According to Ole Matthiessen, global head of cash management, the bank only engages with well‑regulated platforms that meet strict compliance standards.

Deutsche Bank’s ambitions extend beyond custody. It is exploring stablecoins, tokenised deposits, and potential issuance, reflecting a broader strategy to anchor its digital asset business across the value chain. The bank’s head of digital assets, Sabih Behzad, highlighted the options ranging from reserve management to issuing stablecoins, whether solo or in consortiums.

Industry insiders point to looming regulatory clarity—particularly in Europe under MiCA and in the U.S.—as a driving force behind institutional adoption. PwC projects that tokenised assets could swell from around $40 billion today to over $317 billion by 2028, reflecting an appetite for innovation tempered by oversight.

Deutsche Bank’s strategy appears calibrated: building momentum in custody while evaluating tokenised product launches. This dual approach affords adaptability with measured risk—a model that mirrors its cautious adoption of Bitpanda’s IBAN service and Taurus custody tech.

Analysts suggest that established banking institutions will need to offer multi-custodial and tokenisation services if they are to remain relevant in a changing market. As global custodians like BNY and JP Morgan enhance real‑time asset transfer and tokenised solutions, Deutsche Bank’s 2026 launch will position it alongside peers seeking to modernise legacy models.

Deutsche Bank’s custody initiative arrives at a pivotal time. Regulatory frameworks for digital assets are crystallising, and institutional allocations to tokenised securities and stablecoins are gaining traction. Completion of the Bitpanda‑Taurus integration will be a critical milestone, forming the technological foundation of the service.

With momentum gathering, competition is intensifying. Other major banks—such as Banco Santander—are also evaluating stablecoins and custody offerings. At the same time, fintech stand‑alone firms are aggressively scaling in tokenised markets.

Yet Deutsche Bank brings two powerful advantages: it merges legacy banking infrastructure with cutting‑edge digital asset platforms and does so through meticulously selected partnerships. If its 2026 custody service delivers on promised security, compliance and efficiency, it could redefine institutional trust in the tokenised era.

Binance now commands a staggering 87 per cent of global taker futures volume, overshadowing all other platforms combined. OKX, Deribit, BitMEX and Bybit together account for just 10 per cent, underscoring Binance’s extraordinary grip on the derivatives market.

Liquidity advantages explain this dominance. Binance routinely records 24‑hour futures volumes exceeding US$50 billion and open interest of similar scale, dwarfing competitors. Such vast trading depth appeals to institutional players and retail investors alike, reinforcing Binance’s centrality in price discovery and leverage trading.

Data from on‑chain analytics firm CryptoQuant notes that Binance alone accounts for 87 per cent of global taker buy volume. This metric tracks market‑order consumption of liquidity, a key indicator of exchange activity in fast‑moving markets. Analysts say this dominance not only reflects Binance’s scale but also amplifies its influence on global derivatives flows.

While Binance’s dominance is clear, other exchanges continue to carve out niche roles. Bybit holds steady as the second largest player in perpetuals, and OKX remains a major competitor for altcoin futures. Deribit continues its leadership in the Bitcoin options space, though its slice of futures volume remains small in comparison.

Regulatory scrutiny, however, poses threats to Binance’s hegemony. The exchange has confronted legal challenges across multiple jurisdictions, including high‑profile cases in the US, UK, Canada, Belgium and Nigeria. While a US plea agreement in late 2023 imposed a US$4‑billion fine and saw Changpeng Zhao step aside, Binance has since implemented compliance reforms and launched regional ventures to navigate regulatory barriers.

Despite regulatory headwinds, Binance’s infrastructure remains formidable. Its capacity to offer up to 125× leverage on Bitcoin futures, along with hundreds of perpetual and quarterly contracts, attracts traders seeking high‑speed, high‑stakes strategies. The exchange also sustains deep liquidity across both USDT‑margined and coin‑margined instruments, further cementing its appeal.

Market observers flag potential risks in concentrated market power. Binance’s outsized role means shifts in its taker behaviour can reverberate across crypto markets. A recent dip in Binance’s taker buy/sell ratio to below 1.0—while other platforms remained net buyers—sparked concern that Binance‑driven selling pressure could herald broader price corrections.

Still, Binance’s dominance exerts a self‑reinforcing effect. Traders aim to engage where order books are deepest and execution is fastest—creating a virtuous cycle that keeps Binance at the centre. For competitors, gaining even modest gains in market share requires overcoming Binance’s head start, deep pockets and global reach.

Looking ahead, industry watchers see Binance’s influence persisting as long as it maintains technical robustness, product innovation and competitive fees. Rival exchanges are stepping up with new offerings—such as OKX’s grid trading bots, Bybit’s aggressive funding strategies, and Deribit’s options liquidity—but their futures volume remains dwarfed.

Governor Greg Abbott has enacted House Bill 1056, authorising Texans to use gold and silver as legal tender for routine financial transactions beginning on 1 May 2027. The measure amends the state government code, empowering the comptroller’s office to set the metal-to-dollar exchange rate at the time of each transaction.

Abbott emphasised that the move draws upon Article I, Section 10 of the United States Constitution, which restricts states from issuing currency other than gold or silver coins. Although federal reserve notes will remain lawful, the new law permits their coexistence and makes acceptance of precious metals optional for businesses and consumers.

Supporters regard the law as a historic step toward financial sovereignty, providing residents with greater control over their assets. The initiative is the latest in Texas’s broader push toward alternative currencies, complementing the establishment of a state strategic bitcoin reserve. Advocates say this diversification could act as a hedge against inflation and enhance the resilience of the state’s economy.

The meteoric trajectory from legislative passage to effective implementation is significant, but practical details remain in development. Texans will deposit metals into accounts at the Texas Bullion Depository in Leander and access them using a debit-card system. Each transaction will convert metal to dollar value based on comptroller-set pricing, though specifics on fees and merchant participation are yet to be disclosed.

While market reaction has been measured, analysts predict the legislation could lift local demand for physical gold and silver, particularly if residents embrace the option. Economists also note that instituting this system requires robust authentication and verification mechanisms, as stakeholders raise concerns over counterfeit metal use.

Retailers might face logistical hurdles, including securing reliable point-of-sale systems and managing valuations for fluctuating metal prices. Abbott’s office has indicated that public education campaigns and pilot programmes are planned to facilitate adoption.

Texas is the first state to operationalise gold and silver for daily commerce on this scale, though several states maintain statutes recognising their role as legal tender without establishing transaction mechanisms. Prior experiments in alternative currency systems include “Goldbacks,” privately issued gold notes accepted in select locations, but these lacked legal backing at the state level.

The new law’s dual focus on precious metals and bitcoin underscores Texas’s ambition to position itself at the forefront of monetary innovation. By leveraging constitutional provisions, state officials aim to expand the toolkit available to residents and businesses, offering both tangible and digital currency options.

Nonetheless, detractors caution that the metal-based system may complicate transactions and add regulatory burdens. Verification protocols, pricing transparency and merchant liability issues will need careful management to avoid undermining public confidence. Texas’s comptroller is expected to issue guidance on these matters in the coming months to ensure a smooth rollout.

Implementation will proceed incrementally over the next 22 months, with the comptroller’s office overseeing regulatory design and infrastructure setup. If executed effectively, the scheme could serve as a model for other states contemplating alternatives to fiat currency; if not, it may highlight the complexity of adding precious metals to everyday monetary flows.

Kraken has launched xStocks, a platform enabling users outside the United States to trade 60 tokenised U.S. stocks and ETFs around the clock, five days a week. Accessible through the Kraken app, these equities are issued on the Solana blockchain and are fully backed one‑for‑one by genuine shares held via Backed and Dinari, offering both price parity and economic rights.

The new service opens over 60 blue‑chip names—including Apple, Tesla, Nvidia and Amazon—to non‑U.S. investors, granting fractional ownership starting at just US$1, with no purchase fee in USD or Kraken’s native USDG. Trading is available 24/5 via the exchange, while withdrawal to self‑custodial wallets allows for 24/7 on‑chain usage, such as collateral in DeFi.

Kraken’s co‑chief executive Arjun Sethi described xStocks as a “foundational” shift in investment accessibility, emphasising seamless, permissionless ownership without intermediaries or geo‑barriers. The tokens are structured as SPL assets on Solana, chosen for its speed and efficiency, and dividends are auto‑reinvested into additional tokens, though users forfeit direct voting rights.

Kraken has imposed geo‑restrictions, excluding U.S. persons as well as residents in Canada, EU, UK and Australia during the initial rollout—but plans to expand to more than 185 countries in the coming weeks and eventually extend to multiple blockchains. The exchange emphasizes adherence to regulatory frameworks, supported by its partnerships with Swiss issuer Backed and U.S. SEC‑registered transfer agent Dinari.

The advent of tokenised stocks follows earlier, less‑successful attempts by Binance in 2021, which encountered regulatory pushback in multiple jurisdictions. Coincidentally, Bybit unveiled access to the same xStocks pool two hours after Kraken, signalling an intensifying push within the crypto sector. Bybit’s version supports both Solana and Ethereum versions, aimed at users seeking a bridge between traditional finance and crypto.

The global tokenisation of equities is attracting attention across the industry. Robinhood has launched tokenised stock trading in the EU in partnership with Arbitrum, enabling EU residents to trade over 200 U.S. equities 24/5. Coinbase is also pursuing approval from the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission to offer tokenised equities domestically, pending regulatory clearance. Several firms recognise tokenisation’s potential to reduce costs, improve settlement times, and introduce continuous trading, though they acknowledge challenges surrounding liquidity and regulatory harmonisation.

Market watchers suggest tokenised equities could reshape global finance. The linkage to blockchain allows cross‑border access, seamless custody and composability in DeFi ecosystems. Critics note limitations, such as absence of voting rights and uncertain secondary‑market liquidity. The World Economic Forum and legal analysts have underlined the need for clearer disclosure standards and global regulatory coordination.

Kraken’s move appears calibrated to capitalise on a regulatory shift favouring tokenisation. It actively engages with international regulators, avoiding pitfalls that stymied predecessors. Its strategy builds on existing infrastructure—such as its listing of more than 11,000 traditional U.S. securities to U.S. clients—melding established market access with on‑chain innovation.

The launch of xStocks marks a pivotal moment in mainstreaming tokenised finance. By undercutting geographical limitations, slashing fees and uniting traditional equities with crypto rails, Kraken and peers are edging global capital markets closer to seamless, inclusive accessibility. As the ecosystem evolves, attention will turn to how regulatory authorities respond and whether liquidity deepens to support this new asset class.

BitMine Immersion Technologies has unveiled a $250 million private placement of common stock to underwrite an ambitious Ethereum treasury initiative, alongside a high-profile board shift. CEO Jonathan Bates and newly appointed Chairman Thomas Lee, the Fundstrat founder, revealed that the move will dramatically reshape the company’s balance sheet and strategic direction.

This offering encompasses 55.6 million shares at $4.50 each, the proceeds earmarked for acquiring Ether as BitMine’s principal reserve asset. Supported by leading crypto firms including FalconX, Kraken, Galaxy Digital and custody providers BitGo and Fidelity Digital, the strategy seeks to transform BitMine into one of the largest publicly traded holders of Ethereum.

Driven by MOZAYYX with participation from Founders Fund, Pantera Capital, Republic Digital, DCG and others, the placement is scheduled to close around July 3, pending approval from the NYSE American. ThinkEquity acted as placement agent, and Cantor Fitzgerald advised the lead investor.

Thomas Lee emphasised that this marks “the rapid and continued convergence of traditional financial services and crypto,” noting that Ethereum’s dominance in stablecoin transactions makes it an optimal treasury asset. He described stablecoins as “the ‘chatGPT’ of crypto,” underlining Ethereum’s strategic importance.

BitMine’s pivot offers direct access to Ethereum’s protocol-level capabilities—staking and participation in decentralised finance mechanisms—shifting the firm beyond its origins as a pure-play miner.

Market reaction has been enthusiastic: BitMine’s stock surged over 200% in pre-market trading, carefully erasing what had been a roughly 45% year-to‑date decline. Investing.com reports volatility in its share price over recent months and warns that gross margins remain subdued, hovering at approximately 16.4%.

BitMine has already embarked on its crypto treasury plan, acquiring 100 BTC on 9 June and bringing its total bitcoin holdings to about 154.17 BTC purchased via a previous share issue. The Ethereum tranche will amplify crypto exposure—treasury levels are expected to multiply by over 16 times.

The firm aims to introduce ETH‑per‑share as a new key performance metric, aligning shareholder value directly with crypto asset holdings. The strategy reflects a belief in Ethereum’s broader technology utility—particularly through stablecoins, tokenised assets and smart contracts that underpin DeFi activities.

Officials caution that this strategy brings heightened volatility and regulatory risk. However, BitMine’s leadership sees this as a strategic diversification from Bitcoin‑centric holdings, moving towards programmable blockchain exposure. Their operational footprint—in Trinidad, Texas and Silverton—continues, but the treasury pivot signals a profound evolution.

The closing of this placement, conditional on standard regulatory approvals, will signal BitMine’s entry into a new class of hybrid crypto‑traditional finance entities. With institutional backing and strategic leadership in boardroom and treasury, the company is redefining its public profile.

Hyperliquid has processed a staggering $1.571 trillion in perpetual futures volume over the past year, outstripping all other on‑chain perp platforms combined. In June alone, it accounted for $208 billion in trading, compared with a collective $140 billion for its rivals, while revenues reached $56 million for the month and reached $310 million to date.

The scale of Hyperliquid’s growth positions it at the apex of the decentralised derivatives landscape. It handled $248 billion in May trading volume, marking consecutive monthly milestones and accelerating ahead of competitors. High‑frequency and professional traders have migrated in significant numbers, drawn by the platform’s deep liquidity and sub‑second trade execution, powered by its Layer‑1 consensus architecture.

From a revenue standpoint, Hyperliquid’s fee income has climbed in tandem with its trade volume. The $56 million earned in June boosted cumulative revenues to $310 million, indicating a protocol that is both popular and profitable. This places Hyperliquid among elite DeFi entities by financial metrics.

Its distinctive approach includes a high yield from protocol fees—the majority of which are reinvested through HYPE token buybacks—and the launch of HyperEVM, an Ethereum‑compatible layer that supports smart contracts and decentralised applications. This diversification strategy is intended to establish Hyperliquid beyond perpetuals trading, and into a broader DeFi ecosystem.

The platform’s airdrop strategies have been instrumental in attracting users and liquidity. A notable HYPE token airdrop, totalling around $1.2 billion in value, triggered a sharp increase in activity at the end of 2024. Monthly volumes leapt from approximately $75 billion in November to over $150 billion in December.

Despite early-stage competition, Hyperliquid now dominates with approximately 70 per cent market share of decentralised perp volume, while still trailing major centralised exchanges such as Binance—where it handles roughly 10 per cent of Binance’s volume.

Underlying infrastructure also underpins its rapid adoption. Hyperliquid supports over 100,000 transactions per second and offers sub‑second trade finality with extraordinarily low spreads. Its fee structure—0.025 per cent taker fees and a 0.002 per cent maker rebate—encourages high-frequency participation.

The HYPE token, launched via the airdrop in November 2024, has experienced a dramatic uptick in value, up 300 per cent in two months and recently reaching a market capitalisation north of $12 billion. Reinvestment of over 97 per cent of fee revenue into token buybacks is designed to reinforce token utility and value.

Analysts acknowledge the bold strategy but flag decentralisation concerns—Hyperliquid operates just 21 delegated validators compared with thousands in more established chains, which may raise governance and resilience risks. Still, the streamlined validator model has enabled performance gains attractive to traders.

Market observers also point to institutional interest, such as Nasdaq‑listed Lion Group designating HYPE as a primary treasury asset, signalling growing confidence in the network’s tokenomics.

Kazakhstan’s National Bank, under its chairman Timur Suleimenov, is taking steps to build a state-held cryptocurrency reserve managed by a subsidiary entity, following international sovereign fund practices. The proposal outlines funding sources that include confiscated crypto-assets and coins mined through ventures with state participation—measures aimed at enhancing governance and stability within the digital asset ecosystem.

The National Bank is developing a comprehensive framework for the reserve’s formation and administration, emphasising transparency and institutional safeguards. It plans to enshrine in law both the status of the reserve and the protocols for deposit and use, with draft legislation to be submitted to parliament for approval.

Suleimenov highlighted that the envisioned affiliate would follow global norms for sovereign funds, ensuring robust accounting, secure storage, and resilient governance structures. The legal amendments under discussion would affirm the reserve’s legal standing and empower authorities to handle crypto-assets seized under law as well as profits generated from state-linked mining operations.

The banking chief stressed the importance of centralised institutional oversight, noting the high volatility and vulnerability of crypto-assets. Centralisation, he said, is key to mitigating risks such as market fluctuations or cyber threats.

This effort is part of a wider regulatory overhaul targeting cryptocurrency flows. Under proposals by the Ministry of Digital Development, draft laws would impose criminal and administrative liability on grey‑market trades, require licences for investment advisers, and curb unlicensed exchanges and misleading crypto promoters—many of whom target younger investors.

Parliamentary deputies have endorsed the overarching concept. One lawmaker, Kuspekov, recommended creating a “national digital reserve” at the central bank to anchor confiscated digital assets and tighten financial controls. He also urged strengthened due diligence by banks, prohibition of unlicensed crypto platforms, and mandates for licensed investment coaches.

These developments follow a surge in legislative activity since May. The National Bank has proposed amendments defining legal status for digital assets, licensing for crypto exchanges outside the Astana International Financial Centre, and a regulatory sandbox for testing digital services. The objective is to restore confidence in Kazakhstan’s crypto sector after capital flight estimated at US$15 billion last year.

Timur Suleimenov, appointed as National Bank chair in September 2023 and former minister of national economy, has emphasised institutional integrity and macroeconomic resilience. He recently noted that international reserves reached US$104.7 billion at end-2024, bolstered by gains in gold and foreign-exchange holdings.

The crypto reserve initiative appears aligned with broader state efforts. Issuance of AIFC‑backed crypto payment cards was piloted in early June by major banks including Halyk Bank, Forte and Altyn Bank—allowing consumers to instantly convert digital assets into fiat currency for everyday purchases.

The Ministry of Digital Development has proposed the creation of a crypto reserve as a digital asset repository to support the national digital economy. This official endorsement underscores the government’s increasing interest in integrating digital assets within its fiscal infrastructure.

Central to this initiative are practical mechanisms that remain under review. The National Bank is working with law-enforcement agencies and other government bodies to outline operational procedures, compliance norms and asset custody arrangements.

Decentralised exchanges now account for 27.92% of global spot trading volume compared with centralised exchanges, marking a sharp rise from just 0.36% in June 2020.

Trading platforms operating without intermediaries have attracted a growing user base. The surge is primarily driven by rapid token listings, enhanced accessibility, and traders seeking autonomy over assets.

Crypto‑analytics firm CryptoRank reports the 27.92% figure as of 27 June 2025. On the same date, CoinStats and Cointelegraph confirmed that DEX activity has surpassed one quarter of combined CEX volumes.

Market analysts say this shift reflects a fundamental change in how users approach crypto. DEXs often offer immediate listing for new tokens, while CEXs enforce extensive vetting, delaying token debut. This gives DEXs an edge for traders looking to seize early opportunities.

Industry professionals highlight improved user interfaces, multi‑chain support, and deep wallet integration—such as MetaMask and Coinbase Wallet—as key enablers reducing friction for users.

At the same time, spot volume on CEXs has declined, reverting to levels last seen in 2020, according to CryptoQuant data. This drop has fed into the rising share of DEXs even if total trading volumes remain flat.

Numerous industry insiders emphasise that long‑term holders, or ‘HODLers’, are withdrawing assets from centralised platforms to personal wallets. This trend has further depressed CEX volumes and benefited decentralized trading.

Beyond token listings, privacy and transparency concerns have played a role. Faced with heightened scrutiny of centralised platforms and regulatory pressures, users often gravitate towards DEXs that allow control over private keys and transaction traceability.

The market has witnessed high‑value token offerings, including memecoins and Web3 project tokens, debuting exclusively on DEXs where speculative interest is strong. These listings typically bypass CEX vetting procedures, reinforcing DEX popularity among investors seeking first‑mover advantage.

Despite DEX progress, CEXs still dominate overall trading: the remaining 72.08% of spot volume remains on centralised systems. Their robust liquidity, institutional investor access, and features like leverage trading continue to appeal to many investors.

Analysts caution that DEX market share gains may plateau unless total trading activity grows or CEX volume drops further. However, if DEX share surpasses 30%—a threshold some industry observers regard as a tipping point—it could reshape how trading infrastructure evolves.

Technological strides are helping drive DEX adoption. Layer‑2 rollout, smart-contract efficiency, and multisignature governance have reduced fees and slippage. Cross‑chain bridges further improve functionality, with networks like Ethereum, Solana, and Polygon enabling seamless movement across blockchains.

Security remains a concern, however. DEX platforms, while reducing risks associated with central custodians, expose users to smart‑contract vulnerabilities. High‑profile exploits continue to underscore these weaknesses. That said, liquidity protocols such as Uniswap v3 and LayerZero have incorporated rigorous audits, bug‑bounty programmes, and verifiable codebases to bolster confidence.

Regulation continues to loom over both exchange types. Centralised platforms must comply with KYC/AML rules and are vigilant following recent regulatory crackdowns. DEXs operate in a more decentralised fashion but may face scrutiny for permitting unvetted tokens. Some global jurisdictions are investigating DEX platforms for facilitating illicit finance.

Emerging market participants – from speculative traders to institutional investors – are now evaluating DEXs as viable alternatives. These platforms support algorithmic trading bots, liquidity pools, yield‑farming incentives, and governance staking. Both market segments are adapting to a blended ecosystem.

Looking ahead, analysts are watching developments in decentralised autonomous organisations and algorithmic market‑making, which may reshape trading dynamics. Advances in privacy protocols, like zero‑knowledge rollups, could further catalyse DEX appeal by enhancing user confidentiality.

Institutional adoption remains cautious. Regulatory clarity, custody solutions, and conventional compliance standards are still being developed. Yet a growing cohort of fintech firms are exploring hybrid DEX‑CEX offerings, combining institutional-grade services with decentralised execution.

While DEX market share has reached unprecedented levels, it remains uncertain whether this marks a permanent realignment. The next pivotal indicator will be whether DEXs can sustain growth in a stable or expanding market, rather than merely displace CEX volume amid stagnation.