News related to
risk

FalconX, a leading cryptocurrency prime brokerage, has initiated informal talks with bankers and advisers to explore an initial public offering in 2025, signalling a significant move to satisfy burgeoning institutional demand for digital assets. The firm, which last raised $150 million in 2022 at an $8 billion valuation, is not yet retaining an underwriter—an early but strategic step toward going public.

Founded in 2018, FalconX began as a crypto-focused prime broker, enabling clients to trade directly on exchanges. Today it spans three verticals—markets, custody and staking, and direct market access prime brokerage—positioning itself as a full-spectrum financial services provider for institutional clients. This evolution reflects growing investor interest in digital assets and the firm’s expansion through deals and strategic integration.

In early 2025, FalconX acquired Arbelos Markets, marking its entry into the derivatives segment, a lucrative but highly competitive space. It also forges partnerships with established players such as Standard Chartered, integrating global banking and foreign-exchange capabilities, and with Cantor Fitzgerald, accessing a credit facility collateralised by Bitcoin—its “first step in a broader credit framework” to bolster institutional offerings.

The broader crypto sector is experiencing an IPO wave. Several digital-asset platforms, including Fold, Exodus and eToro, have listed in 2025. Notably, stablecoin issuer Circle achieved a landmark $1.1 billion IPO on 5 June, marking the largest crypto-market debut in history and fuelling expectations of further listings. Following Circle’s success, firms such as Bullish and Gemini filed for public listings, with Kraken and Justin Sun’s Tron Group also preparing filings.

Amid this sector-wide momentum, FalconX is working to enhance its public profile, seeking to craft a compelling narrative ahead of a potential IPO. The firm’s strategy, according to one insider, emphasises readiness to appeal to public-market investors, including both strategic partnerships and public relations positioning.

The firm’s track record underpins its IPO ambition. In June 2022, it secured a $150 million Series D led by Singapore’s GIC and B Capital at an $8 billion valuation. That round also involved Thoma Bravo, Wellington Management, Adams Street Partners and Tiger Global Management. CEO Raghu Yarlagadda emphasised FalconX’s market‑neutral model, rigorous risk‑management and profitability amid volatility—a rarity in the crypto space.

With over $430 million in capital raised to date, FalconX has demonstrated resilience, continuing to hire and expand services even as competitors retrench. GIC’s commitment and the firm’s strategic posture reflect stable investor confidence.

Institutional demand for crypto is rapidly growing, and FalconX’s moves align with this shift. The acquisition of Arbelos, banking collaboration and credit facility signal a broader ambition to integrate traditional and digital finance infrastructures, broaden offerings and close service gaps. As co-head of markets Joshua Lim observed, strategic partnerships and acquisitions enable FalconX to fill missing links that would otherwise force customers to assemble services piecemeal.

Within this context, launching an IPO emerges as both a capital‑raising tool and a visibility lever. As one adviser noted, “When you launch an IPO, you need to have a story…. You’re selling yourself to the investing public”. FalconX’s groundwork suggests readiness to craft that narrative, aligning with its strong financial position and strategic trajectory.

A coalition of South Korea’s top 100 firms generated an economic contribution of 1,615.2 trillion won in 2024, marking a 3.9 percent rise from the previous year, according to CEO Score data released on 18 June. Samsung Electronics led the charge with a 7 percent increase to 157.5 trillion won, accounting for 9.8 percent of the total haul.

This growth reflects an integrated model of wealth distribution across stakeholders—suppliers, workers, government, shareholders and communities. Total sales of these firms reached 2,122.4 trillion won, growing 6.6 percent year-on-year, underlining the deep economic interlinkages driving expansion.

Hyundai Motor secured the second position with a contribution of 115.2 trillion won, followed by Kia at 86.6 trillion won, which spectacularly posted the steepest increase thanks to surging supplier payments. Among the top ten contributors were LG Electronics, Hyundai Mobis, GS Caltex, SK Energy, Posco, Samsung C&T and LG Chem. In contrast, LG Energy Solution saw a pronounced drop of 28.3 percent to 19.2 trillion won, weighed down by lower stakeholder payouts.

Industry breakdown highlights that electronics and IT firms contributed about 370 trillion won, followed by petrochemicals at 312 trillion won and the auto sector at 303.5 trillion won. Construction, shipbuilding, steel and distribution made further sizeable additions, reflecting a diverse industrial base.

The dominance of chaebol giants—especially Samsung—continues unabated. Samsung and its affiliates, constituting nearly a quarter of national GDP, help drive national innovation and exports. Beyond scale, these conglomerates are embracing strategic shifts. Government figures show a record R&D investment of 83.6 trillion won by South Korean firms, with Samsung alone ploughing 30.2 trillion won into innovation, followed by SK hynix at 4.5 trillion won, Hyundai at 4.3 trillion won, and LG Electronics at 3.4 trillion won.

Despite stepping up R&D budgets by 15.3 percent, only 40 domestic firms made the global top 2,000 by R&D outlays, compared to 681 in the US and 524 in China—underscoring scope for further thrust in innovation. Within semiconductors, South Korea continues to hold a dominant global footprint, commanding approximately 60 percent of the DRAM market and 52.6 percent of NAND, led by Samsung and SK hynix. Notably, SK hynix claimed 36 percent of DRAM market share in Q1 2025, overtaking Samsung’s 34 percent.

This data reveals a dual narrative: chaebol behemoths remain the backbone of the economy, but a growing reliance on innovation and global competitiveness is reshaping the corporate landscape. Hyundai’s pivot to electric vehicles, Kia’s ramped-up supplier integration and LG’s diversification into chemicals and energy solutions are emblematic of this shift.

However, concentration risk persists. Samsung and its affiliates form a significant share of GDP and exports, but reliance on a limited set of heavyweights may expose the economy to global headwinds. The comparative lag in R&D-intensive mid-sized firms risks stifling long-term resilience.

Nevertheless, public policy is responding. Regulatory tweaks aimed at supporting corporate research and streamlining licensing protocols, alongside financial incentives and infrastructure development, suggest a proactive stance to broaden innovation beyond the chaebol core.

As South Korea navigates economic turbulence—from fluctuating global demand to supply chain uncertainties and U.S.–China tech tensions—the measured expansion of stakeholder-driven value and intensification of R&D efforts signal a strategic repositioning.

Powered by over 45 AI‑based strategies spanning arbitrage, trend‑following and swing trading, the platform reports impressive performance metrics. Annualised returns range from 60 % to 3 500 %, win rates hover between 85 % and 95 %, maximum drawdowns are tightly controlled at 15–70 %, and Sharpe ratios exceed 2.6 — all underpinning over USD 1 billion in assets under strategy management as of Q2 2025. One standout offering, “BTC Grid Arbitrage + AI Risk Control”, executed 540 trades in 2024 with a 92 % success rate and yielded a total return of 272 %.

At its heart, Nivex purports AI is not simply a feature, but the platform’s operating system. Users define goals and the AI assumes responsibility for detecting trends, assembling strategies, allocating capital, managing risk and executing trades at millisecond speeds. Combined with a suite of tools including spot and futures trading, dollar‑cost averaging and grid trading, the platform positions itself not as an exchange, but an intelligent asset engine.

A central component of Nivex’s offering is its AI Strategy Engine, which supports customizable parameters—such as leverage, stop‑loss, DCA and drawdown limits—and integrates institutional-grade strategies. Complemented by Smart Yield and AI Lending systems, users can earn APYs of up to 60 % on fixed terms, while automated lending tools continually optimise on‑chain opportunities.

Critical to its ambitions is delivery of institutional‑grade signal copying. By aggregating signals from global quant funds, Nivex enables retail users to subscribe and replicate live trades via automated execution, stop‑loss and performance tracking—without any coding. The company asserts this approach raises win rates by 30 % and improves execution speed by 80 % compared with manual trading.

Nivex is also developing an “Institutional Buying Heat Index” based on fusion of ETF flows, on‑chain transfers, CEX‑DEX liquidity movements and sentiment signals. This engine converts macro and micro market trends into actionable portfolios for both retail users and institutional clients via APIs and data subscriptions.

Compliance and geographic expansion underpin Nivex’s credibility. The platform operates service centres in North America, Dubai, Hong Kong, Singapore and Southeast Asia, holding licences with FinCEN and MSB, and pursuing approvals from MAS, VARA and AUSTRAC. It also hosted AI‑driven closed‑door summits at Token2049 Singapore, attracting industry leaders such as Justin Sun of TRON.

Industry analysts highlight a growing shift in trading infrastructure—from simple order‑matching to data‑driven, strategy‑oriented platforms. Nivex exemplifies this trend, providing automated AI‑based strategy execution at a time when global investment in AI surpassed USD 350 billion in 2024.

The AI trading platform market is projected to grow from USD 11.5 billion in 2024 to USD 75.5 billion by 2034, at a CAGR of 20.7 %, driven by high demand for automation, faster decision‑making and cost reduction. Within this context, major players include Kavout, Numerai and Algotraders — yet Nivex’s rapid integration of AI, compliance and global deployment positions it as a formidable contender.

Yet adoption of AI in trading brings challenges. Regulatory regimes struggle to keep pace, raising concerns about algorithmic opacity, data integrity and algorithmic bias. Nivex appears conscious of such risks, emphasising transparency, backtesting via a Strategy Lab, risk‑control features and strict KYC/AML protocols.

From a user experience angle, Nx.one’s prior focus on intuitive interface design, multi‑language support, real‑time analytics and security layer architecture—including multi‑signature wallets, cold storage, encryption, firewall defences and audit transparency—appears retained under Nivex.

CEO Simon highlighted Nivex’s core vision: “We’re not building a cheaper exchange—we’re building a smarter platform. Let the system trade for you. Let AI manage risk. Let data create wealth,” adding, “In the next five years, the most valuable asset won’t be trading skills. It’ll be your connection to a system that improves itself”.

JD.com is preparing to deploy a regulated stablecoin through its Hong Kong arm as part of a significant expansion into digital payments. Its subsidiary, Jingdong Coinlink Technology Hong Kong, entered the Hong Kong Monetary Authority’s stablecoin sandbox in July 2024. The project is testing tokens pegged to the Hong Kong dollar and other major currencies, aiming for a wider rollout in the fourth quarter of 2025.

Tests performed by JD Coinlink have covered cross-border payment mechanisms, retail use cases—initially in JD Global’s Hong Kong and Macau markets—and investment applications on a public blockchain, ensuring transparency and regulatory compliance. JD is targeting integration across its extensive e-commerce ecosystem, including fast‑settling transactions for global trade, M&A deals, B2B settlements and consumer checkouts.

Richard Liu, JD’s founder and chairman, highlighted the company’s aim to secure stablecoin licences across major currency jurisdictions, citing the potential to cut cross‑border payment costs by up to 90 per cent and reduce settlement times to approximately 10 seconds. Liu underlined that once B2B applications prove viable, JD intends to broaden the stablecoin’s use to everyday consumer purchases within its platform.

The HKMA granted licences only to firms demonstrating robust risk controls and consumer protections. Under the Stablecoins Ordinance, which passed on 21 May 2025, issuers using or referencing the Hong Kong dollar must obtain formal approval and meet stringent obligations including reserve backing, redemption rights, transparent governance and segregation of client assets.

Jingdong Coinlink is complemented by parallel efforts to issue an offshore yuan stablecoin, though its launch hinges on regulatory authorisation from mainland authorities. This aligns with wider interest in the stablecoin market: Ant Group is also pursuing Hong Kong licences, and Western giants including JPMorgan, PayPal and Standard Chartered are racing to launch stablecoins.

Hong Kong’s regulatory clarity gives JD.com and its peers a regional advantage. The sandbox initiative, begun in March 2024, enabled live testing under HKMA supervision prior to licence application. With the Ordinance’s full force due on 1 August 2025, JD appears well aligned to capitalise on a rapidly evolving framework.

JD’s stablecoin will be issued on a public blockchain, enabling open verification of issuance volume and reserve data. CEO Liu Peng confirmed that the second phase of testing concluded in May, focusing on cross-border, retail and investment use cases. Assuming regulatory approval, licensing and integration plans are on track for Q4 2025.

These efforts form part of JD’s broader strategy to become a fintech powerhouse. The company recently expanded in food delivery and consumer finance, acknowledging a “lost” five‑year stretch of innovation. Its current push builds on JD’s in‑house blockchain infrastructure—Zhizhen Chain—which already facilitates roughly US $7 billion annually in supply‑chain finance.

Industry analysts observe that JD’s combination of logistics, e‑commerce reach and blockchain technology positions it uniquely among digital‑asset issuers. With nearly 600 million active users and operations spanning over 20 countries, the company could accelerate stablecoin adoption by integrating token payments into its merchant network.

As global stablecoin activity accelerates—fuelled by regulatory developments like the U.S. GENIUS Act and Hong Kong’s licensing framework—JD.com may emerge as one of Asia’s first large-scale retail-facing stablecoin providers.

Depending on its licensing trajectory, JD plans to list its stablecoin on regulated exchanges and deploy it on a public blockchain in Q4 2025. Beyond the HKD coin, the company is developing offshore yuan functionality, pending mainland approval.

Lawmakers in Ohio’s House Technology and Innovation Committee have approved House Bill 116 — dubbed the “Bitcoin Rights” measure — with a unanimous 13‑0 vote. The legislation safeguards personal control over encrypted digital assets, explicitly legalises individual and corporate mining and node operation, and provides a state income‑tax break of up to US $200 per transaction in capital gains from digital assets.

The bill, formally titled the Ohio Blockchain Basics Act, moves to the full House for a vote as part of an initiative to position the state as a hub for blockchain and cryptocurrency operations.

At the heart of the measure is the protection of self‑custody rights, allowing citizens to keep their crypto in hardware or self‑hosted wallets without interference from state or local authorities. It also shields miners and node operators from regulatory burdens. Individuals may mine at home, in residential zones, and businesses may operate industrial‑scale mining farms where zoning rules permit. Additionally, digital‑asset activities such as mining, staking, token swaps and node‑running would not trigger money‑transmitter or investment licensing requirements.

Another key component is the $200 per transaction exclusion from Ohio state income tax on capital gains from digital assets used as payment. That threshold is set to rise annually with inflation, offering relief to small‑scale users and encouraging routine use of cryptocurrency in commerce. Local governments, including municipalities and charter counties, would also be barred from imposing their own taxes or fees on such transactions.

The legislative analysis explains that the bill prevents state or locality from prohibiting acceptance of crypto as payment or from confiscating hardware or wallets. In industrial zones, mining operations enjoy protections from discriminatory rezoning, though noise and zoning regulations still apply.

Proponents, including the bill’s primary sponsor, Representative Steve Demetriou, have framed the bill as a foundational move to foster technology innovation, champion financial autonomy and attract blockchain businesses to Ohio. The bipartisan, unanimous committee vote reflects broad political willingness to embed crypto‑friendly measures at state level.

Supporters argue Ohio will benefit economically by drawing in infrastructure investment and fostering public familiarity with digital assets — especially with enhanced legal certainty and tax incentives in place.

However, critics caution that the bill may leave regulatory gaps, presenting consumer‑protection and environmental challenges. Concerns have been raised over potential disregard for energy‑intensive mining’s impact on local power grids and carbon emissions. Others warn that dubbing activities like mining and staking as outside the scope of money‑transmitter laws could allow for unmonitored financial operations.

Industry experts and legal analysts note that the bill’s nuanced definitions — covering digital assets, hardware wallets, self‑hosted wallets, nodes and mining operations — constitute one of the more comprehensive legal frameworks for crypto in the US. Its allowance for pension funds to study digital‑asset ETF investment is also seen as a significant institutional development.

Under the bill, each state retirement system must submit a report within a year assessing the viability, advantages and risks of investing in digital‑asset ETFs, and offer recommendations to reduce exposure in case of such investments.

Should the full House and Senate pass the bill and the governor sign it, Ohio will rank among the most crypto‑welcoming states. Observers suggest that its balanced approach — mixing legal clarity, tax relief and targeted environmental zoning controls — may serve as a model for other jurisdictions exploring blockchain policy frameworks.

With the committee stage complete, attention now turns to the legislature’s upper chamber, where further amendments or debates may arise. Policy‑wonks will be watching for potential changes on environmental stipulations and consumer protections, as well as alterations to the tax‑exemption levels.

The U.S. Senate has enacted the GENIUS Act, the first-ever federal framework for regulating dollar‑pegged stablecoins, with a decisive 68–30 bipartisan vote on 17 June 2025. Eighteen Democrats joined Republicans in supporting the legislation, which now advances to the House and is expected to reshape Washington’s digital asset rules.

The bill mandates that stablecoin issuers back tokens with liquid assets such as U.S. Treasuries, require regular financial disclosures and adhere to anti‑money‑laundering measures. It grants banks the authority to issue stablecoins, while explicitly restricting executive branch officials and legislators from sharing in their profits—a direct response to concerns over conflicts of interest.

A surge in crypto-sector investment in political campaigns appears to have shifted momentum. Industry spending topped $119 million in support of pro‑crypto congressional candidates during the 2024 cycle. Lobbyists then intensified efforts to engage Democratic lawmakers, viewed as essential for reaching the 60-vote threshold in the evenly divided Senate.

Internal communications among Democratic operatives reveal strategic alignment with crypto backers. In a private group chat described in reporting by the Lever, coalition members acknowledged that, despite ethical concerns, opposing the industry would be “political suicide.” One member reportedly observed that any amendment targeting Trump‑family conflicts would be “DOA,” suggesting token amendments offered for optics rather than impact.

Legislators including Senator Elizabeth Warren have voiced misgivings, arguing that the bill inadequately shields consumers or addresses risks associated with big‑tech or foreign‑issued stablecoins. She contends it grants too much leeway to the likes of former President Donald Trump’s crypto ventures, such as the Trump memecoin and World Liberty Financial.

The crypto lobby’s efforts have extended beyond campaign funding to retention of influential political operatives. Coinbase, for instance, recently appointed veteran Democratic strategist David Plouffe to its advisory board, joining a roster of insiders from both parties. Observers note this reflects crypto’s emerging status as a “politically competitive” constituency.

The political dynamic has shifted decisively. As AP reports, Democrats are balancing distrust of Trump-linked crypto enterprises with newfound recognition of the sector’s electoral influence. Backing the GENIUS Act became for many a strategic necessity, notwithstanding deep ideological resistance to deregulation.

The Senate vote occurred amid broader legislative discussions. The CLARITY Act—aimed at clarifying agency jurisdiction across the SEC and CFTC—is under consideration in the House Financial Services Committee. Some lawmakers propose merging the stablecoin and authority-defining bills, though others caution it could delay the GENIUS Act’s passage.

Crypto industry leaders view the GENIUS Act as a critical precursor to more comprehensive legislation. Ledger’s Head of Global Policy, Seth Hertline, described the Senate’s action as “a political bellwether” for the sector’s broader legislative agenda.

The bill’s passage also intersects with Trump’s personal crypto interests. His family’s stablecoin projects have sparked accusations of profiteering and lobbying for relaxed oversight. Critics warn that current legislative safeguards fall short of preventing conflicts of interest.

The next phase lies in the House, where Republican leadership must reconcile the Senate’s GENIUS Act with its own STABLE Act or integrate it into broader regulatory plans. Some Republicans advocate adding provisions to limit central bank digital currency initiatives, though such measures may complicate Senate approval.

Major stablecoin issuers such as Tether and Circle —together controlling over $200 billion in supply—stand to gain regulatory clarity and legitimacy if the GENIUS Act becomes law. Recent moves by major corporates, including JPMorgan’s planned stablecoin on Coinbase’s Base chain and indications that Amazon and Walmart are exploring token issuance, signal growing private‑sector enthusiasm.

As the House deliberates, questions remain whether the Senate’s bipartisan vote marks the start of a fully fleshed-out U.S. crypto regulatory regime—or the culmination of a high-stakes battle between policy integrity and political pragmatism.

Qatar has instructed LNG carriers to remain outside the Strait of Hormuz until one day prior to loading operations as regional security risks heighten, with officials emphasising that this measure is precautionary and unlikely to disrupt overall supply volumes.

The directive from QatarEnergy affects vessels bound for the Ras Laffan terminal, one of the world’s largest liquefied natural gas export facilities. Around a dozen carriers are idling in ballast outside the terminal, awaiting final instructions before undertaking brief, tightly scheduled transits through the strait.

Market indicators reacted swiftly: European gas prices surged as much as 4.8%, while Asian benchmarks inched upward amid growing concern over potential delivery delays. Despite this, analysts and industry insiders maintain that the streamlined entry process—coupled with Qatar’s steady production—should keep cargo volumes within normal parameters.

This move aligns with contingency efforts by the world’s third-largest LNG exporter. Industry sources confirm that the carriers will execute “quick entry and speedy exits” across the Hormuz passage, necessitating precise scheduling and coordination with maritime authorities.

Analysts acknowledge that about 20–25% of global LNG traffic transits the Strait, underscoring its significance as a logistical chokepoint. Instructing vessels to loiter offshore aims to reduce their vulnerable exposure time in the strait.

Strategic analysts warn that escalating tensions—particularly after recent military exchanges involving Israel and Iran—increase risks for all Gulf shipping. Tehran has threatened to seal off the strait, which could strain Qatar’s export pipelines and ripple through global energy markets.

Despite geopolitical headwinds, Qatar’s production at the South Pars/North Field complex remains steady. The foreign ministry emphasised that LNG output and shipments continue to follow their usual course, even as the country takes enhanced security measures.

Operational insights from shipping analysts describe a familiar summer idling pattern, but note slight increases in loitering time and cautious routing. Vessels such as the tanker HLAITAN are reportedly waiting outside the strait in anticipation of load orders.

Market response has been modest. European gas hubs such as TTF recorded price rises of around 4–5%, while the Asia‑Pacific’s JKM benchmark reached nearly $14 per mmBtu, marking a $1.20 uptick since mid‑June. CNBC‑style commentary points out that the precautionary shift is “unlikely to cause major disruption,” although insurers are adjusting premiums to reflect the heightened transit risks.

For global exporters and importers, Qatar’s stance underscores a renewed emphasis on maritime risk management. Shipping firms are increasingly factoring geopolitical volatility into their routing and scheduling protocols. International insurers have begun revising coverage for LNG carriers traversing the Gulf, citing increased premiums tied to potential missile or drone threats in the region.

Qatar’s approach enables more controlled maritime planning: by delaying vessel entry until close to the loading window, the country limits their exposure to strategic bottlenecks and regional flare‑ups. This calculated move underscores Doha’s dual priorities of maintaining export reliability and protecting vital shipping assets.

Abu Dhabi’s state‑owned oil giant ADNOC has unveiled plans to escalate its U.S. energy investments six‑fold over the next decade, targeting a total of $440 billion. Speaking in Washington on 17 June, Sultan al‑Jaber, ADNOC Chief Executive and UAE Minister of Industry and Advanced Technology, declared that the American market is “not just a priority; it is an investment imperative” for the company’s global expansion.

Al‑Jaber underlined the urgency of the move, emphasising that artificial intelligence represents a “once‑in‑a‑generation investment opportunity.” He pointed out that the growth of data centres driven by AI will demand substantial power— “The next stage of evolution” in energy consumption, he said. The planned investments will span a wide spectrum: anchor stakes in the largest liquefied natural gas facility in Texas, petrochemical plants, and the deployment of 5.5 gigawatts of renewable energy paired with storage systems “from coast to coast”.

ADNOC’s international investment arm, XRG, is cementing its presence with a new Washington office, aimed at steering these high‑stakes ventures. XRG has already struck a deal with Occidental’s 1PointFive for a direct air capture project in Texas, with potential investment reaching $500 million. Additional widescale cooperation includes agreements to develop U.S. gas, LNG, specialty chemicals and energy infrastructure.

The announcement synchronises with a broader bilateral strategy: in March, senior UAE officials committed to a ten‑year, $1.4 trillion investment framework in the U.S., covering sectors such as AI, energy, semiconductors and manufacturing. As part of that pact, U.S. companies agreed to invest $60 billion in UAE energy assets. The XRG–Occidental partnership, as well as other collaborations involving ExxonMobil, Japanese firms Inpex and JODCO, is expected to expand capacity at Abu Dhabi’s major offshore oil field, Upper Zakum.

At the Atlantic Council Global Energy Forum in Washington, al‑Jaber addressed the broader challenge of powering AI, stating that U.S. energy infrastructure must undergo a “system‑wide shift” to keep pace. He highlighted the need to hyperscale energy supply—from gas, renewables with storage and nuclear—to meet the projected requirement of 50–150 GW of new capacity just in the next five years. He warned against prematurely retiring existing power plants, advocating instead for grid modernisation and rapid permitting for new infrastructure.

Environmental groups have voiced concern that the surge in AI‑driven energy demand could lead to rising carbon emissions unless clean energy is prioritised. In response, al‑Jaber suggested that AI could, in fact, offer solutions—optimising grid efficiency and managing load fluctuations, effectively “unlocking its own energy challenge”.

The energy‑AI summit ENACT, hosted by XRG and MGX alongside the Atlantic Council, gathered leading figures from across the energy, tech and finance sectors. Delegates, including representatives from Exxon, OpenAI and BP, discussed mid‑ and long‑term strategies to address the escalating power needs of hyperscale data centres.

These developments are set against a backdrop of rising instability in the Middle East, where al‑Jaber cautioned that energy remains a “cornerstone of peace, stability and prosperity,” signalling that the new chapter of collaboration aims to underpin global energy security.

For the U.S., the influx of investment promises a host of benefits: large‑scale infrastructure expansion, high‑task employment, and reinforced energy resilience. Projects under the UAE umbrella—from LNG plants to hydrogen and carbon capture initiatives—are poised to generate thousands of jobs, while U.S. energy firms gain access to new development avenues both at home and back in the Gulf.

Yet questions remain. Policy experts stress that realisation of al‑Jaber’s ambitious vision will depend heavily on ensuring timely regulatory approvals and creating an effective risk environment for private capital. Moreover, balancing fossil fuel commitments with the drive toward decarbonisation will require clear direction from both governments and industry stakeholders.

South Korea’s Seoul Southern District Court on 17 June acquitted Haru Invest CEO Lee Hyung‑soo of fraud charges linked to the collapse of withdrawal services that triggered investor losses of approximately $650 million. The court determined there was no deliberate intention to mislead the 6,000-plus affected depositors, citing legitimate business activity that merely suffered collapse from contagion stemming from the FTX collapse.

Prosecutors had alleged Lee orchestrated a $650 million fraud scheme by misleading investors and misappropriating user funds. They argued that the firm, owned by parent company Blockcrafters, presented itself as secure and sustainable before halting withdrawals in mid‑2023, inflicting financial hardship on users. Nonetheless, the court concluded that while Haru Invest’s model carried high risk, it was not inherently deceptive.

The court’s ruling also cleared the company’s co‑CEOs at Blockcrafters, who faced similar allegations. In contrast, Haru’s chief operating officer, Kang, received a two‑year prison sentence after being found guilty of embezzlement. The court determined Kang had transferred client funds to his personal accounts, a charge distinct from the fraud accusations directed at Lee and other executives.

Judges noted connections between Haru’s difficulties and the broader collapse of the cryptocurrency ecosystem following the FTX failure. They observed that Haru deployed a legitimate yield‑earning model using third‑party counterparties, including B&S Holdings, but that the sudden disruption in liquidity markets amplified losses. There was no evidence, the ruling held, that Lee intentionally misrepresented Haru’s operations or risk profile to investors.

Concurrently, prosecution testimonials during closing arguments revealed that Haru marketed its platform as capable of delivering annual interest rates exceeding 10 per cent on deposits of Bitcoin, Ethereum and USDT. Investor expectations were inflated, yet those losses, believed to be exacerbated by exposure to over‑leveraged counterparty relationships, were judged to result from systemic failure rather than criminal intent.

Throughout the proceedings the defence emphasised Lee’s commitment to asset return. Lee personally told the court that investors retained ownership of their crypto assets and that Haru operated legally under custody arrangements. He insisted that financial setbacks resulted from Bernard Bang’s mismanagement at B&S, a company entrusted with executing Haru’s yield‑earning strategy. The defence maintained that Haru’s abrupt withdrawal suspension in June 2023 was a reactive measure to liquidity pressure, not an attempt to defraud.

Meanwhile, the court confirmed that Kang, the COO, diverted funds into accounts unrelated to Haru’s operations, violating fiduciary responsibility, and meriting his conviction. His sentence reflected the separation in responsibility between him and senior management, who genuinely believed in and operated under a legitimate model.

The financial aftermath continues: Haru has appointed an insolvency administrator and launched a creditor claims process affecting thousands of both domestic and overseas investors. According to user‑submitted civil filings, the firm is pursuing recovery of assets tied to the FTX bankruptcy estate, including staking returns and counterparties’ restitution. Victims are filing asset‑recognition claims under Korean bankruptcy law, arguing that deposited tokens belong to them and should be returned outside Haru’s bankrupt estate.

In parallel, appellate proceedings are expected for Kang, whose sentence may be modified as his embezzlement involved funds beyond his legal authority. Lee and his co‑CEOs are also preparing appeals, emphasising that Haru’s structure and disclosures conformed with regulations at the time of operation.

Vietnam’s Techsmart Telecom, the Institute of Information Technology and CyberSecurity, UAE’s Venom Foundation and Abu Dhabi’s GS Fund have signed a memorandum of understanding to advance a sovereign digital finance framework. The scheme centres on a national Data Centre, supervised stablecoin issuance, cross-border settlement infrastructure, cybersecurity protocols and fintech training—a landmark convergence of telecom, blockchain, finance and security sectors.

The agreement mandates Venom Foundation’s sovereign-grade Layer‑0 blockchain be deployed in Vietnam. The foundation, already liaising with central banks across Southeast Asia—including Singapore, Malaysia, the Philippines and Vietnam—will integrate ISO 20022 messaging, on‑chain KYC/AML, real-time settlements and asset tokenisation capabilities into the system. GS Fund will spearhead the data centre’s construction under a stable legal and economic regime, while IITCS tackles regulatory framework, compliance and talent development, and Techsmart manages connectivity and integration.

Work in the initial phase, set for the next 12 months, will prioritise the technical architecture, legal foundations and national infrastructure planning. Vietnam’s demographic profile—a young, technologically literate population—and its expanding cross-border fintech activities are seen as key enablers for asset tokenisation, according to Venom Foundation. Dr Hoang Phuoc Thuan of IITCS highlighted Resolution 57’s role in connecting sovereign data ambitions with e‑government and AI development.

This public–private partnership reflects Vietnam’s Digital Infrastructure Strategy, which targets universal fibre, extensive 5G coverage and advanced data centre roll-out by 2030. Venom’s Layer‑0 blockchain—already piloted in the Philippines with the Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas—cements institutional-grade readiness for programmable finance and asset digitisation.

Regulatory progress has been underway since March’s Prime Ministerial directive, with the Ministry of Finance and State Bank of Vietnam tasked to propose a Digital Technology Infrastructure law, introduce regulated sandboxes and pilot a crypto framework by May 2025. Amid this, Vietnam’s digital asset market has grown substantially—around 17 million citizens currently hold crypto assets valued at over US $100 billion—placing the country in the top five worldwide for individual interest and top three in trading volume.

Issues remain unresolved: incomplete guidelines on exchange licensing, asset categorisation and customer protection have placed Vietnam on the Financial Action Task Force’s grey list. Integrating blockchain with conventional banking operations—spanning accounting, risk management and cybersecurity—also poses significant implementation hurdles.

Further reinforcing policy alignment, the Vietnam Blockchain Association and One Mount Group—members of the VBA—have pledged between US $200 million and US $500 million to establish a sovereign Layer‑1 blockchain, complying with Prime Ministerial Directive 05/CT‑TTg.

The final vision foresees multi-year rollout phases extending beyond initial legal and technical milestones to encompass digital payments, reduced reliance on physical cash, strengthened cybersecurity via distributed ledgers, and expanded fintech education for government and private sectors under IITCS guidance.