News related to
data

Chinese social media platforms are abuzz with users expressing strong opposition to suggestions that Beijing should acquiesce to U.S. trade demands following President Donald Trump’s recent tariff escalations. The online discourse reflects a nationalistic sentiment, with many netizens urging the Chinese government to stand firm against what they perceive as economic intimidation.

President Trump announced a 10% baseline tariff on all imports, with significantly higher duties targeting specific countries, including a 54% tariff on Chinese goods. This move has intensified trade tensions between the world’s two largest economies. In retaliation, China imposed a 34% tariff on various American products, signaling its resolve to counter U.S. measures.

The Chinese Foreign Ministry’s spokesperson, Guo Jiakun, highlighted the global market’s adverse reaction to the U.S. tariffs, stating, “The market has spoken.” This remark underscores Beijing’s position that the U.S. actions are disruptive to international trade stability.

State-run media outlets have also weighed in, criticizing the U.S. administration’s approach. The Global Times labeled the tariff threats as “ridiculous” and indicative of “deep arrogance,” while China Daily warned that such actions could lead to a “mutually destructive tariff war.”

On platforms like Weibo and WeChat, Chinese citizens are vociferously rejecting any notion of capitulation. Users are calling for unity and resilience, emphasizing the importance of safeguarding national interests and economic sovereignty. This collective online sentiment reflects a broader public consensus supporting the government’s stance in the escalating trade dispute.

Hong Kong’s Securities and Futures Commission has intensified its scrutiny of virtual asset platforms offering staking services, emphasizing the associated risks and potential legal ramifications. The regulatory body has observed a surge in platforms promoting high-yield returns through staking, prompting a public advisory on the matter.

Staking, a process where cryptocurrency holders delegate their assets to support blockchain network operations, has gained popularity as a means to earn passive income. However, the SFC warns that many of these staking arrangements are not regulated, leaving investors vulnerable to significant risks, including the total loss of their investments. The commission highlighted that some platforms offer returns by on-lending deposited virtual assets or engaging in other investment activities without adequate transparency.

In a statement, the SFC underscored that certain staking programs might constitute unauthorized collective investment schemes . Under Hong Kong law, promoting or operating such schemes without proper authorization is a criminal offense, potentially leading to substantial fines and imprisonment.

The regulatory focus on staking services aligns with Hong Kong’s broader efforts to establish a comprehensive framework for virtual assets. The SFC has been actively exploring the introduction of new token listings, derivatives, and margin trading to enhance the city’s position as a digital asset hub. Julia Leung, the SFC’s Chief Executive, announced plans to potentially expand the regulatory framework to facilitate the listing of new tokens exclusively for professional investors and to review existing safeguards for retail offerings.

The SFC is considering the regulation of crypto derivative trading for professional investors, aiming to facilitate efficient risk transfer within the market. Staking is another area under review, with the commission planning to establish requirements governing the custody of client assets and mitigating risks associated with staking activities.

In addition to these initiatives, the SFC has been in discussions with crypto exchange-traded fund issuers about the possibility of including Ether staking options. This move could allow ETF issuers to stake ETH and generate passive income, providing investors with additional avenues for returns. However, these discussions are ongoing, and no definitive timeline has been established for implementation.

Emirates Airline has intensified its sustainability initiatives by implementing a closed-loop recycling programme aimed at reducing plastic waste. This initiative involves recycling millions of onboard items, including plastic trays, bowls, snack dishes, and casserole dishes, at a local facility in Dubai. These items are remanufactured into new meal service products for use on flights, aligning with the principles of a circular economy where materials are reduced, reused, and recycled.

The recycling process entails collecting used and damaged meal service items from Economy and Premium Economy Class after flights. These items are then washed, inspected for damage, and transported to a Dubai facility where they are ground down, reprocessed, and remoulded into new dishes, bowls, and trays. The remanufactured products are subsequently returned to Emirates Flight Catering for use in future in-flight services.

Emirates has partnered with deSter FZE UAE, a leading provider of serviceware concepts to the aviation industry and an expert in closed-loop manufacturing, for this initiative. The new meal service items contain at least 25% reused material, with plans to increase this proportion over time. The deSter facility in UAE was chosen to minimize the carbon footprint associated with recycling processes, as it eliminates the need to send products to other countries for recycling. The factory also incorporates sustainable design principles, focusing on solar power, efficient water use, and waste minimization.

Ethereum’s performance relative to Bitcoin has declined significantly, with the ETH/BTC trading pair reaching its lowest level since March 2020. This downturn reflects Ethereum’s struggle to keep pace with Bitcoin’s recent market dominance.

The ETH/BTC ratio, a key indicator of Ethereum’s value compared to Bitcoin, has fallen to approximately 0.031. This means one Bitcoin is now equivalent to about 32.26 Ether, a stark contrast to previous periods where Ethereum showed stronger performance. This decline is attributed to Bitcoin’s substantial appreciation over the past year, outpacing Ethereum’s growth.

Bitcoin has experienced a remarkable surge, appreciating by approximately 158% over the past year. Its price escalated from around $41,000 in January 2024 to over $107,000. In contrast, Ethereum’s growth has been more modest, with its price increasing by about 35% in the same timeframe, remaining approximately 32% below its all-time high of $4,878 recorded in November 2021.

Several factors contribute to Ethereum’s underperformance relative to Bitcoin. Notably, the re-election of pro-crypto President Donald Trump has been associated with a favorable outlook toward Bitcoin, potentially influencing investor sentiment and contributing to Bitcoin’s price surge. Additionally, the rise of competing smart contract platforms, such as Solana, has intensified competition in the space, drawing attention and investment away from Ethereum.

Market analysts express concerns about Ethereum’s future trajectory. The declining ETH/BTC ratio suggests a shift in investor preference toward Bitcoin, potentially impacting Ethereum’s market position. Some analysts predict that if current trends persist, Ethereum may face further challenges in regaining its previous market dominance.

Bitcoin’s price experienced a significant drop, falling from over $83,000 to below $77,000 within a 24-hour period. This abrupt decline led to the liquidation of more than $1 billion in leveraged positions, with long positions accounting for approximately $865 million of the total. The sudden downturn caught many traders off guard, resulting in substantial financial losses across the cryptocurrency market.

Data from Coinglass indicates that a total of 305,170 traders were liquidated during this period, reflecting the widespread impact of Bitcoin’s price movement on investor positions. The majority of these liquidations stemmed from long positions, where traders had anticipated a price increase. As the market moved against them, forced sell-offs occurred, further accelerating the downward momentum.

Among the affected cryptocurrency exchanges, Bybit and Binance recorded the highest liquidation volumes, with $411.54 million and $242.25 million, respectively. Bitcoin itself accounted for the largest share of the total liquidations, contributing $371.66 million. Ethereum was the second most impacted cryptocurrency, with $200.94 million in liquidations, while other crypto assets collectively accounted for over $100 million. The single largest liquidation order took place on Bitfinex, involving a $13.40 million BTC position being forcefully closed.

The high liquidation volume suggests that many traders were caught off guard by Bitcoin’s price drop. With long positions dominating the liquidations, it indicates that market sentiment was largely bullish before the downturn. This scenario underscores the inherent volatility of the cryptocurrency market and the risks associated with leveraged trading.

Despite the sharp downturn, some analysts remain optimistic about Bitcoin’s long-term trajectory. Crypto analyst Javon Marks noted that indicators still suggest Bitcoin could be gearing up for a larger bullish rally. Meanwhile, RektCapital pointed out that Bitcoin’s decline has resulted in a fully filled CME gap between $84,650 and $93,300, which could potentially lead to a price reversal in the near term.

The recent price movement also aligns with patterns observed in previous market cycles. Historically, Bitcoin has experienced significant price corrections following substantial rallies. These corrections often lead to a shakeout of leveraged positions, contributing to market volatility. However, such corrections have also been followed by periods of consolidation and subsequent recoveries.

Market analysts suggest that the current price drop may be attributed to a combination of factors, including profit-taking by long-term holders and macroeconomic uncertainties. The broader financial markets have been experiencing volatility, with investors reacting to various economic indicators and geopolitical developments. These external factors can influence investor sentiment and contribute to price movements in the cryptocurrency market.

The recent liquidation event serves as a reminder of the risks associated with leveraged trading in the cryptocurrency market. Traders employing leverage amplify their potential gains but also their potential losses. In volatile markets, sudden price movements can trigger margin calls and forced liquidations, leading to significant financial losses.

Indian metal companies are significantly expanding their operations, driven by robust domestic demand, even as they navigate complex global trade dynamics. Industry leaders such as Vedanta and JSW Steel are at the forefront of this growth, unveiling ambitious plans to scale up production capacities across various segments.

Vedanta, a prominent conglomerate, has announced a $20 billion expansion strategy encompassing sectors like zinc, aluminium, copper, iron, steel, oil, gas, and power. This initiative includes seeking global partnerships to bolster its ventures. The company is also in the process of restructuring into four distinct entities: Vedanta Aluminium, Oil and Gas, Power, and Iron and Steel. Notable investments involve allocating $2 billion to $2.5 billion for enhancing Hindustan Zinc’s production and $5 billion aimed at increasing oil output through Cairn India. Additionally, Vedanta plans to double its power portfolio and explore opportunities in nuclear energy, targeting 5 GW of nuclear power for internal consumption within India.

JSW Steel, another major player, is pursuing an aggressive expansion trajectory. The company aims to elevate its production capacity from the current 27.5 million tonnes per annum to 38.5 mtpa by the fiscal year 2024-25. This growth strategy includes commissioning iron ore and coal mines in Karnataka, Odisha, and Goa, which is expected to reduce operational costs. JSW Steel is also investing in renewable energy projects to further decrease production expenses. The company has set a target to reach a 50 mtpa capacity before 2030, reflecting confidence in sustained domestic demand growth.

Tata Steel is also contributing to the industry’s expansion by adding 5 million tonnes to its existing 21 mtpa capacity. Similarly, Jindal Steel and Power plans to increase its capacity by 6 million tonnes, building upon its current 9.6 mtpa. Collectively, these initiatives represent a substantial investment aimed at capitalizing on India’s burgeoning steel consumption, which is projected to grow between 8% to 10% in the fiscal year 2024-25.

The Indian government’s policy measures are playing a crucial role in supporting domestic manufacturers. The “Domestically Manufactured Iron and Steel Products Policy 2025,” effective from April 1, mandates that all government ministries and agencies prioritize locally produced steel products. This policy aims to protect the domestic steel industry from the influx of cheaper imports, particularly from countries like China, South Korea, and Japan. It also restricts the use of foreign certifications or stringent technical specifications that could disadvantage local suppliers and bars foreign entities from participating in Indian tenders if their home countries impose procurement restrictions on Indian mills.

Despite these protective measures, Indian steelmakers face challenges from international trade policies. The United States has imposed a flat 26% reciprocal tariff on all Indian exports, citing high Indian tariffs on U.S. goods. This move is expected to impact key Indian export sectors, including electronics, gems and jewellery, and certain aluminium and auto parts. However, pharmaceuticals and energy products are exempt from these tariffs. In response, India is engaging in negotiations with the U.S. for a new trade deal and has expressed willingness to reduce tariffs on $23 billion worth of U.S. imports. Additionally, India is exploring opportunities to expand exports in sectors like textiles, apparel, footwear, and steel, particularly as higher tariffs are levied on Chinese goods.

The United Arab Emirates has reaffirmed its position as the global leader in Fibre to the Home connectivity, achieving a penetration rate of 99.3%. This marks the eighth consecutive year the nation has topped international rankings, surpassing technological hubs such as Singapore, Hong Kong, China, and South Korea. The FTTH Council’s latest annual report highlights this milestone, underscoring the UAE’s commitment to advancing its digital infrastructure.

The FTTH Council’s analysis encompassed data from 20 countries with FTTH availability exceeding 50%. Singapore secured the second position with a penetration rate of 97.1%, followed by Hong Kong at 95.3%, China at 92.9%, and South Korea at 91.5%. The UAE’s leading status reflects the nation’s strategic emphasis on developing next-generation digital infrastructure to support its economic and technological ambitions.

Central to this achievement is e& UAE, formerly known as Etisalat, which has played a pivotal role in enhancing the country’s connectivity landscape. The company has consistently invested in and developed world-class infrastructure for both 5G and fibre networks. Masood M. Sharif Mahmood, CEO of e& UAE, stated that the UAE’s proactive strategies and investments in fibre connectivity are a testament to the nation’s visionary leadership and its confidence to empower people to thrive in the digital age.

The UAE’s focus on fibre connectivity is integral to its broader digital transformation agenda. The nation has continuously invested in innovation and next-generation technologies to expand and enhance its infrastructure. This robust network forms the backbone of a digital ecosystem that supports various advanced technologies, including augmented reality, robotics, and artificial intelligence.

The high FTTH penetration rate offers tangible benefits to both consumers and enterprises. For consumers, it translates to high-speed internet access, facilitating seamless experiences in gaming, streaming, and other bandwidth-intensive applications. Enterprises, on the other hand, can leverage this infrastructure to support advanced use cases, applications, and technologies, thereby driving digital transformation across various sectors.

Beyond performance enhancements, fibre connectivity contributes to energy efficiency and sustainability goals. It is also critical in advancing hyperscalers, 5G Advanced, data centre connectivity, smart cities, and AI-driven initiatives. The UAE’s commitment to fibre connectivity aligns with its vision to become a global hub for innovation and technology.

The global shipping industry is experiencing significant upheaval following the implementation of extensive tariffs by U.S. President Donald Trump. These measures, including a 25% tariff on imports from Canada and Mexico and a 10% levy on Chinese goods, have disrupted international trade flows and introduced widespread economic uncertainty.

In anticipation of these tariffs, container vessel traffic to American ports surged by 12% last month, reaching a record 281 port calls in the week ending March 13, as reported by Ami Daniel of AI data provider Windward. This rush to ship goods ahead of the tariffs has complicated annual freight contract negotiations, set to begin on May 1, according to Norwegian analytics firm Xeneta. Asian shipping companies have responded by raising prices for routes to the U.S. to offset the expected tariffs on Chinese-built ships, as noted by Singapore-based Linerlytica.

The automotive sector has been notably affected. Jaguar Land Rover announced a temporary halt to exports of its British-made vehicles to the U.S. in response to the 25% import tariff. The company, which exports nearly a quarter of its 400,000 annual vehicle sales to the U.S., is assessing the financial impact and exploring options such as price increases for American consumers and boosting sales in other markets. Other UK-based automakers, including BMW, Rolls-Royce, and Ineos Automotive, are also evaluating their responses, with Ineos already raising U.S. prices.

The financial markets have reacted sharply to the tariff announcements. The Dow Jones Industrial Average and S&P 500 experienced significant declines over the past week, falling 7.9% and 9.1%, respectively, with the Dow dropping over 2,200 points on Friday alone. China responded with retaliatory 34% tariffs, escalating fears of a deepening trade war. Experts, including Moody’s chief economist Mark Zandi, warned that the tariffs could hinder productivity, damage the U.S.’ investment image, and prompt global allies to distance themselves from U.S. trade.

In the United Kingdom, Prime Minister Keir Starmer is considering a significant reset of the country’s economic policies in response to the U.S. tariffs. The FTSE 100 has plummeted over 7% in its worst week since the COVID-19 panic in March 2020. Amid fears of a prolonged recession, Starmer and Chancellor Rachel Reeves are reportedly contemplating raising taxes or altering fiscal rules to increase borrowing and stimulate growth, despite previous pledges to the contrary. British businesses, such as JLR, are already feeling the pressure, with the automotive sector particularly vulnerable due to its reliance on exports to the U.S.

The tariffs have also intensified discussions around supply chain deglobalization. Companies are reassessing their sourcing strategies, with potential shifts toward domestic production and alternative countries like Vietnam and India. This trend is driven by the need to mitigate the impact of tariffs and reduce reliance on any single country for manufacturing. However, such shifts are complex and require significant investment and time to implement.

The shipping industry is facing additional challenges due to the removal of the de minimis exemption for shipments under $800 from Canada, Mexico, and China. This change means that goods arriving by air will be subject to the new and existing tariffs, incur significant filing requirements and costs, and take longer to clear customs. This development could sharply reduce air cargo volumes from China to the U.S., leading to downward pressure on transpacific air cargo rates and potentially affecting the broader air cargo market.

Industry leaders are expressing concern over the escalating trade tensions. Billionaire Elon Musk expressed hopes for a future zero-tariff trade zone between North America and Europe. Meanwhile, leaders from the UK and France emphasized the importance of global cooperation and warned against the detrimental effects of trade wars. Italy’s economy minister cautioned against retaliatory actions and urged a rational response to safeguard Europe’s economic interests.

India’s Supreme Court has raised concerns over a directive from the Delhi High Court that ordered the removal of a Wikipedia page detailing the defamation lawsuit filed by news agency Asian News International against the Wikimedia Foundation. The apex court questioned the necessity of such an order, emphasizing the importance of judicial tolerance towards public commentary on legal proceedings.

The dispute originated when ANI initiated legal action against Wikipedia, alleging that certain edits on its Wikipedia page described the agency as a “propaganda tool” for the central government. ANI contended that these descriptions were defamatory and sought their removal. In response, the Delhi High Court directed Wikipedia to disclose the identities of the individuals responsible for these edits. When Wikipedia did not comply, ANI filed a contempt petition, leading the High Court to order the takedown of the Wikipedia page titled “Asian News International vs. Wikimedia Foundation,” deeming its content potentially contemptuous and an interference with court proceedings.

During the Supreme Court hearing, Justices Abhay S. Oka and Ujjal Bhuyan expressed reservations about the High Court’s directive. Justice Oka remarked, “We can understand if there is a contempt, and contempt is proved pursuant to notice. Somebody wants to purge the contempt, so he removes that content. But to tell somebody to remove something because there is some criticism of what the Court has done, that may not be correct.” The bench highlighted the necessity for courts to be receptive to public scrutiny and criticism, especially in the digital age where information dissemination is rapid and widespread.

Vietnam’s economic growth has decelerated in the first quarter of 2025, coinciding with the United States’ imposition of a 46% countervailing tariff on Vietnamese exports. This development raises concerns about the nation’s export-driven economy and its future trajectory.

The newly enforced tariff is expected to significantly impact Vietnamese exports, potentially affecting goods worth up to $37.5 billion, which represents approximately 2% of the country’s GDP. Key sectors such as electronics, machinery, apparel, and footwear are anticipated to bear the brunt of these tariffs, leading to increased prices for American consumers and prompting multinational companies to reconsider their supply chain strategies.

The U.S. administration justifies the tariff by citing concerns over Vietnam’s alleged unfair trade practices and substantial trade surplus with the United States. The tariff is part of a broader strategy targeting several Asian manufacturing economies, with Vietnam facing one of the highest rates. Other affected countries include China , Thailand , Indonesia , and South Korea . Even traditional U.S. allies like Japan and Taiwan have been subjected to tariffs of 24% and 32%, respectively.

Industry experts warn that these tariffs could lead to higher prices and reduced product choices for U.S. consumers. Companies are now evaluating their global supply chains, with some considering shifting operations to countries like Mexico, Brazil, and India to mitigate the impact. However, large-scale relocation of labor-intensive industries to the United States remains unlikely due to high domestic labor costs and a shortage of skilled workers.

In response to the tariffs, Vietnam is exploring strategies to mitigate the economic impact. These include diversifying export markets, enhancing product quality, and leveraging existing free trade agreements such as the European Union-Vietnam Free Trade Agreement and the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership . By broadening its market reach and improving the investment climate, Vietnam aims to navigate the challenges posed by the U.S. tariffs and sustain its economic growth.

Ondo Finance’s native cryptocurrency, ONDO, is currently trading at $0.8041, reflecting a slight decline of 0.0131% from the previous close. The token’s intraday performance has seen a high of $0.8216 and a low of $0.7952.

The recent downturn in ONDO’s value aligns with escalating global trade tensions, which have introduced volatility across financial markets, including the cryptocurrency sector. Analysts are closely monitoring the $0.786 support level, considering it a critical threshold for ONDO’s short-term price stability. A breach below this point could signal further declines, while maintaining above it may indicate potential for recovery.

Technical indicators present a mixed outlook. The Relative Strength Index for ONDO stands at 41.91, suggesting that the token is neither in overbought nor oversold territory. Additionally, an uptick in trading volume during price dips points to increased selling pressure. Conversely, the proximity to the $0.786 support level offers a possibility for a rebound if buyers re-enter the market.

Ondo Finance has been proactive in bridging traditional finance with decentralized finance . The platform focuses on tokenizing real-world assets, aiming to provide institutional-grade liquidity solutions. Collaborations with prominent financial entities such as BlackRock, Franklin Templeton, and PayPal underscore its commitment to integrating conventional financial instruments with blockchain technology.

Cryptocurrency exchange FTX has disqualified approximately 392,000 customer claims after users failed to verify their identities by the March 3 deadline, potentially nullifying claims exceeding $2.5 billion. This action affects a substantial portion of creditors seeking restitution following FTX’s collapse in November 2022.

FTX creditor advocate Sunil Kavuri estimates that claims under $50,000, totaling around $655 million, and larger claims amounting to approximately $1.9 billion are subject to disqualification due to Know Your Customer violations. The KYC process, a standard compliance measure in the financial industry, requires users to provide personal identification information to prevent fraud and money laundering.

FTX’s bankruptcy proceedings have been complex and protracted. In October 2024, U.S. Bankruptcy Judge John Dorsey approved the company’s wind-down plan, allowing FTX to utilize up to $16.5 billion in recovered assets to fully repay customers. The plan prioritized customers with claims of $50,000 or less, aiming to reimburse 98% of such claimants within 60 days of the plan’s effective date.

The repayment process commenced on February 18, 2025, targeting the “convenience class” of creditors with claims under $50,000. Distributions were facilitated through cryptocurrency firms Kraken and BitGo, with customers expected to receive funds within one to three business days. FTX Recovery Trust Plan Administrator John J. Ray III acknowledged the significance of this milestone but emphasized the ongoing nature of recovery efforts.

The next phase of repayments is scheduled to begin on May 30, 2025, addressing larger claims exceeding $50,000. FTX has amassed an $11.4 billion cash reserve to fund these payments. Bankruptcy attorney Andrew Dietderich informed the court that while minor creditors have started receiving payments, the first distribution to major debt holders is set for late May.

Despite these efforts, some creditors have expressed dissatisfaction with the repayment terms. Concerns have been raised about reimbursements being based on cryptocurrency valuations from November 2022, when prices were significantly lower. For instance, Bitcoin was trading at approximately $16,000 during that period, compared to its current value exceeding $100,000. This discrepancy means that creditors might receive only 10–25% of their crypto’s current value.